Knowledge (XXG)

Talk:German cruiser Deutschland/GA1

Source đź“ť

1012:: This problem just occurred to me and I want to know how you feel about this. Deutschland was originally classified as a Panzerschiff by the Reichsmarine. The Kriegsmarine reclassified her as a heavy cruiser and renamed her Lützow. Therefore shouldn't the article name be "German Panzerschiff Deutschland" or "German cruiser Lützow"? Mixing her Reichsmarine class name with the Kriegsmarine ship name doesn't make sense to me (or vice versa). 636:"The ship accidentally started sliding down the slipway before Hindenburg could give his christening speech." I believe this to be wrong. The christening speech was given by Reichspräsident Heinrich Brüning. The steel towing broke while Brüning was giving his speech. The ship starting moving unplugging the loudspeakers ending his speech prematurely. The band starting playing the national anthem and Hindenburgs spoke the following words: " 456: 433: 419: 388: 364: 337: 327: 302: 288: 274: 243: 209: 42: 831:"The Soviet Navy raised the ship in September 1947 and broke her up for scrap in 1948–1949" HR&S volume 6 page 25 contest this theory! They claim that the ship scrapped was actually the former Admiral Hipper Class Lützow. According to HR&S Lützow never made it to Kronstadt. She sank near Kolberg 950:
was built as a testbed for the engines. A lot of smart engineering went into the C/28 tripple turrets. The result was a higher rate of fire than even contemporary double turrets. A lot of info on crew structure all the way down to the cook and barber is also available. I can only say it is a must for
694:
Manfred Dörr page 282 it states in German (here my translation). KzS Thiele received the KC for his leadership of Kampfgruppe V (5th battle group) during the occupation of Oslo. Thiele took command of the battle group after the sinking of Blücher. According to Scherzer the official KC citation states
945:
I managed to buy this book for 5 Euros. Wow, this book has so much detail. The author, Hans Georg Prager, had served on Deutschland/LĂĽtzow. We have her fate all wrong. The book goes into much detail, incl. pictures, of her sinking. She was sunk by the Soviets. I have to read the book first before I
994:
I shouldn't have started reading Prager :-) "The RAF made another failed attack two days later, but on 16 April, a force of eighteen Lancasters scored a single hit and several near misses on Lützow with Tallboy bombs in the Kaiserfahrt" He claims that Lützow was attacked by a blend of Tallboys and
868:
Another data point for you: In the summer of 1944 Thiele (now admiral) had ordered LĂĽtzow to prepare for Operation Tanne West which was called of after the situation in Finland had stabilized. In this timeframe her anti aircraft capabilities were augmented by replacing the 2cm guns with 4cm guns.
568:
Do you mean the header with the flag? I tried it with both listed in the header and it just makes it jumbled and confused looking - I suppose we could have two boxes, but I don't know if that would be the best alternative, given that we normally use multiple boxes for ships that changed ownership
801:
The heavy cruiser "Lutzow" and the torpedo boats T 33, T 28 and T 8 supported on 8 February through their effective fire the bravely fighting crew of Elbing. Furthermore, this task force took Soviet positions and deployment streets on the Vistula Lagoon under heavy bombardment.
973:
was built as an engine testbed, but not about the C/28 turrets. A lot of that information will be better placed in the class article (which I have finished up to where my sources end - I'm sure there'll be quite a bit to add from Prager).
995:
250kg bombs. None of the Tallboys actually had hit LĂĽtzow directly, but one very near miss ripped her open. She was hit by 250kg bombs. One of the 250kg bombs even had penetrated into the 28cm munition storage but failed to explode.
569:
during their career. If we just stick with one, I think it should stay as it is, since the ship is most known for serving during the war (and indeed spent only 2 of her 12 years in commission with the Reichsmarine).
1084:
I believe the article should be passed at GA level. However, moving forward the entire fate section needs to be reworked because it does not match the Prager, who based his work on the Russian archives.
869:
LĂĽtzow was part of August Thiele's II. Kampfgruppe as of 28 July 1944. In early 1945 she participated in the battles of East Prussia together with Prinz Eugen, Admiral Scheer and various torpedo boats.
47: 519:"She was laid down at the Kriegsmarinewerft shipyard in Wilhelmshaven". The Reichsmarine became the Kriegsmarine in 1935. Deutschland was laid down in 1929!? Something is wrong here 1034:
generally advises generic ship types rather than specific, which to me would favor retaining "cruiser" over "Panzershiff." Maybe we should put this question to a wider audience at
126: 80: 122: 70: 107: 52: 99: 789: 177: 883:
Regarding the references of HR & S, be careful and note that the Deutschland is covered in volume 2 and LĂĽtzow is covered in volume 6.
157: 411: 183: 75: 294: 847: 115: 17: 924: 846:
is unclear, but it seems she survived until at least 1953, though some accounts place her dismantling as late as 1960. See
215: 92: 489:
The second two have been fixed, the first is a result of the dab link at the top of the page and cannot be fixed.
260: 235: 598:
This should be in the class article, which I'm currently reworking - I'd appreciate any info you have for that.
591:
The Reichstag had a lengthy debate. The alternatives were Type A, Type B and Type C. Where is this discussed?
1090: 1065: 1017: 1000: 956: 932: 919:
The German wiki article tells another story about the fate of Deutschland/LĂĽtzow. The reference they use is
888: 874: 700: 621: 555: 151: 669:
commander August Thiele received the Knight's Cross during his command of LĂĽtzow. This should be mentioned.
695:
KC on 18 January 1941 as KzS and commander of heavy cruiser LĂĽtzow. I cited all this on Thiele's article.
1031: 516:
Deutschalnd was ordered and built by the Weimar Republic not Nazi Germany. Shouldn't this be mentioned?
1035: 1047: 979: 906: 855: 818: 747: 718: 681: 656: 603: 574: 537: 494: 850:
for the various claims. I have added the statement by HR&S and noted the discrepancy however.
401: 223: 1086: 1061: 1013: 996: 952: 928: 884: 870: 696: 617: 551: 147: 1039: 735:
LĂĽtzow was mentioned in the Wehrmachtbericht on 9 February 1945. Shouldn't this be mentioned?
350: 219: 187: 1094: 1069: 1051: 1021: 1004: 983: 960: 936: 910: 892: 878: 859: 822: 751: 722: 704: 685: 660: 625: 607: 578: 559: 541: 498: 170: 425: 231: 227: 280: 1043: 975: 902: 851: 814: 743: 714: 677: 652: 599: 570: 533: 490: 163: 525:"The ship was commissioned into the Kriegsmarine on 1 April 1933" again 532:
Thanks, I don't know why I mixed those up - should all be fixed now.
676:
Do you have a citation? He isn't mentioned in any of my sources.
742:
Should be - can you provide me the text of the Wehrmachtberict?
638:
So fahre denn hin in dein Element; ich taufe dich Deutschland
522:"Deutschland was ordered by the Kriegsmarine" Same problem 134: 103: 901:Thanks, I'm not sure how I managed to switch that. 921:Panzerschiff Deutschland, Schwerer Kreuzer Lützow 640:" — "So drive into your element, I christen thee 651:Fixed - I trust HR&S more than Williamson. 1042:to see what other people think would be best. 946:can give you help on this. Did you know that 8: 410:(images are tagged and non-free images have 550:Shouldn't the infobox be updated as well? 30: 788:Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup ( 776:Original German Wehrmachtbericht wording 769: 61: 33: 796:Die Wehrmachtberichte 1939-1945 Band 3 7: 969:That's excellent. I had read that 644:". See HR&S volume 2 page 255. 405:, where possible and appropriate. 24: 469:Three disambiguations need fixing 454: 431: 417: 386: 362: 359:Fair representation without bias 335: 325: 300: 286: 272: 241: 207: 186:for what the criteria are, and 18:Talk:German cruiser Deutschland 1095:19:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC) 1070:07:55, 12 September 2011 (UTC) 1052:22:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC) 1022:10:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC) 1005:12:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 984:11:55, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 961:06:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC) 813:Thanks, added to the article. 1: 937:12:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 911:12:26, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 893:12:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 879:12:11, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 860:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 823:10:14, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 752:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 723:21:54, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 705:21:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 686:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 661:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 626:07:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 608:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 579:14:37, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 560:12:28, 7 September 2011 (UTC) 542:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 499:13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC) 171:16:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC) 476:Deutschland (disambiguation) 455: 432: 418: 387: 363: 336: 326: 301: 287: 273: 242: 208: 779:Direct English translation 1110: 1030:That's a good question. 951:the next quality level. 927:. I don't own this book 1060:I posted the question. 197:reasonably well written 923:by Hans G. Prager see 424:(appropriate use with 190:for what they are not) 399:It is illustrated by 351:neutral point of view 315:broad in its coverage 616:I sent you an email 479:Halifax, Nova Scotia 412:fair use rationales 1082:Concluding summary 383:No edit wars, etc. 256:factually accurate 806: 805: 426:suitable captions 162: 156: 89: 88: 1101: 838:The fate of the 793: 770: 458: 457: 435: 434: 421: 420: 390: 389: 366: 365: 339: 338: 329: 328: 304: 303: 290: 289: 281:reliable sources 276: 275: 245: 244: 211: 210: 168: 166: 160: 154: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 1109: 1108: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1100: 1099: 1098: 787: 784:9 February 1945 348:It follows the 322:(major aspects) 164: 146: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1107: 1105: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1055: 1054: 1025: 1024: 1007: 991: 990: 989: 988: 987: 986: 964: 963: 940: 939: 916: 915: 914: 913: 896: 895: 881: 865: 864: 863: 862: 840:Admiral Hipper 833: 832: 828: 827: 826: 825: 804: 803: 799: 785: 781: 780: 777: 774: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 755: 754: 737: 736: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 727: 726: 725: 708: 707: 689: 688: 671: 670: 666: 665: 664: 663: 646: 645: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 611: 610: 593: 592: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 563: 562: 545: 544: 527: 526: 523: 520: 517: 511: 510: 506: 505: 504: 503: 502: 501: 484: 483: 480: 477: 471: 470: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 461: 442: 441: 440: 439: 438: 397: 396: 395: 394: 393: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 279:(citations to 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 192: 191: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1106: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1087:MisterBee1966 1083: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062:MisterBee1966 1059: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1014:MisterBee1966 1011: 1008: 1006: 1002: 998: 997:MisterBee1966 993: 992: 985: 981: 977: 972: 968: 967: 966: 965: 962: 958: 954: 953:MisterBee1966 949: 944: 943: 942: 941: 938: 934: 930: 929:MisterBee1966 926: 922: 918: 917: 912: 908: 904: 900: 899: 898: 897: 894: 890: 886: 885:MisterBee1966 882: 880: 876: 872: 871:MisterBee1966 867: 866: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 841: 837: 836: 835: 834: 830: 829: 824: 820: 816: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 800: 797: 791: 786: 783: 782: 778: 775: 772: 771: 759: 758: 757: 756: 753: 749: 745: 741: 740: 739: 738: 734: 733: 724: 720: 716: 712: 711: 710: 709: 706: 702: 698: 697:MisterBee1966 693: 692: 691: 690: 687: 683: 679: 675: 674: 673: 672: 668: 667: 662: 658: 654: 650: 649: 648: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 627: 623: 619: 618:MisterBee1966 615: 614: 613: 612: 609: 605: 601: 597: 596: 595: 594: 590: 589: 580: 576: 572: 567: 566: 565: 564: 561: 557: 553: 552:MisterBee1966 549: 548: 547: 546: 543: 539: 535: 531: 530: 529: 528: 524: 521: 518: 515: 514: 513: 512: 508: 507: 500: 496: 492: 488: 487: 486: 485: 481: 478: 475: 474: 473: 472: 468: 467: 460: 459: 452: 449: 448: 446: 443: 437: 436: 429: 427: 415: 413: 407: 406: 404: 403: 398: 392: 391: 384: 381: 380: 378: 374: 368: 367: 360: 357: 356: 354: 352: 347: 341: 340: 333: 323: 319: 318: 316: 312: 306: 305: 298: 296: 284: 282: 270: 266: 265: 263: 262: 257: 253: 247: 246: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 221: 217: 205: 201: 200: 198: 194: 193: 189: 185: 181: 179: 175: 174: 173: 172: 167: 159: 153: 149: 148:MisterBee1966 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 1081: 1080: 1009: 970: 947: 920: 848:that article 843: 839: 795: 641: 637: 450: 444: 423: 409: 400: 382: 376: 358: 349: 331: 321: 314: 292: 278: 269:(references) 268: 259: 255: 213: 203: 196: 176: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 1032:WP:NC-SHIPS 760:Here you go 713:Added now. 642:Deutschland 228:word choice 104:visual edit 1036:WP:MILHIST 794:reference 261:verifiable 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 1044:Parsecboy 976:Parsecboy 925:amazon.de 903:Parsecboy 852:Parsecboy 815:Parsecboy 798:, p. 437. 744:Parsecboy 715:Parsecboy 678:Parsecboy 653:Parsecboy 600:Parsecboy 571:Parsecboy 534:Parsecboy 491:Parsecboy 451:Pass/Fail 332:(focused) 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 1040:WP:SHIPS 1010:Question 158:contribs 76:Criteria 445:Overall 232:fiction 204:(prose) 127:history 108:history 94:Article 971:Bremse 948:Bremse 844:Lützow 842:class 402:images 377:stable 375:It is 353:policy 313:It is 254:It is 234:, and 224:layout 195:It is 180:review 773:Date 509:Facts 482:Palma 236:lists 182:(see 165:count 136:Watch 16:< 1091:talk 1066:talk 1048:talk 1038:and 1018:talk 1001:talk 980:talk 957:talk 933:talk 907:talk 889:talk 875:talk 856:talk 819:talk 790:help 748:talk 719:talk 701:talk 682:talk 657:talk 622:talk 604:talk 575:talk 556:talk 538:talk 495:talk 258:and 220:lead 218:for 188:here 184:here 152:talk 123:edit 100:edit 216:MoS 1093:) 1068:) 1050:) 1020:) 1003:) 982:) 959:) 935:) 909:) 891:) 877:) 858:) 821:) 750:) 721:) 703:) 684:) 659:) 624:) 606:) 577:) 558:) 540:) 497:) 453:: 447:: 430:: 422:b 416:: 408:a 385:: 379:. 361:: 355:. 334:: 330:b 324:: 320:a 317:. 299:: 295:OR 291:c 285:: 277:b 271:: 267:a 264:. 240:: 230:, 226:, 222:, 212:b 206:: 202:a 199:. 178:GA 169:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 1089:( 1064:( 1046:( 1016:( 999:( 978:( 955:( 931:( 905:( 887:( 873:( 854:( 817:( 792:) 746:( 717:( 699:( 680:( 655:( 620:( 602:( 573:( 554:( 536:( 493:( 428:) 414:) 297:) 293:( 283:) 238:) 214:( 161:• 155:• 150:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:German cruiser Deutschland
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
MisterBee1966
talk
contribs
count
16:54, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
GA
here
here
MoS
lead
layout
word choice
fiction
lists
verifiable

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑