Talk:Girls Gone Wild (franchise)

461:

but rarely have any real format, similiar to Girls Gone Wild or otherwise. There's also a franchise known as Wild Party Girls which has been advertised in 30 minute segments late at night on some networks such as Comedy Central and TBS, which is very obviously fake, in that girls are on camera saying how they didn't know they were going to be filmed, although they don't object to it. The whole idea of that is that there's a sorority, and a cameraman who is there sometimes, and films these girls doing things they wouldn't expect themselves to do. The videos don't try to conceal the fact that it's all fake, really. They also have to display a disclaimer stating that they're not associated at all with Girls Gone Wild, a subsidiary of Mantra Entertainment. That's all I know about that. Let's pretend that isn't much.

610:§ 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree. A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she: 1. Either (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm... Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor. 1684:

the title. Threatened lawsuit? pay a small settlement and delete the title. Whatever. In any case, this extensive and mostly unsourced list of titles is simply trivial. We barely are able to compile a list of episodes of "The Tonight Show". We do not have a list of "Let's Make a Deal" episodes. The 10 year test applies. 10 years from now, someone could conceivably be researching something and want to know how many times Carrie Fisher was on "The Tonight Show" each year. I'm hard pressed to see someone wondering how many ways to imply their subjects are close to underage the producers could think of.

269: 368::: I'm a subscriber. The boyfriends are never involved, except in the extremly rare case they're not entirely off frame while a girl is being filmed for the flashing filler sections of the videos. The hotel/tour bus scene are entirely girl/girl with a polcy of no non-employee men allowed on the bus. Just thought i'd clear that up. On a related note, this article is horrible, someone should really do a full overhaul, a job which I don't have time for, i'll do what i can but i'd appreciate a hand. 74: 53: 84: 185: 158: 342:

as I know) there are not penii into vagina type of stuff... just things that Bill Clinton would not necessarily refer to as sex. If I understand it right, the boyfriends are not involved in-video except for feeling 'em up and stuff, so I disagree with "Sometimes the crew will follow a group of girls back to a hotel or other location and tape them engaging in a sexual act in with each other

195: 22: 746:

genitals of the person with the intent of arousing the sexual desire of the person or another person. (2)(a) Public indecency is a Class A misdemeanor. (b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, public indecency is a Class C felony if the person has a prior conviction for public indecency or a crime described in ORS 163.355 to 163.445."

1260:, meaning that it isn't 'far more likely'. In terms of convenience, think of how the reader feels in each case when they get sent to the wrong article: if you are searching for porn, you won't care, but if someone is researching the film, and gets sent to a page about porn, they are not going to be very pleased. 1140:– It is an order of magnitude more inconvenient to end up at a wrong article, which is big, than to get a disambig page, which is small. And the nom's rationale makes no sense; if the film is not notable, propose it for deletion and the problem can be resolved that way. But it is notable, so that won't work. 1683:

Somewhere, in the bowels of the Internet, there is probably a tragic site set up by someone who imagines himself to be an "archivist" of this dreck. His site is not a reliable source. If the producer's site still exists, it is likely not a reliable source. Undocumented ages? Meh, pay the fine, delete

960:

Yeah there's clearly a mistake here: In Jeff Dunham: Spark of Insanity, Jeff mentions that (after his performance in Ft. Lauderdale Florida) that is where they tape the most of the Girls Gone Wild DVDs. His puppet Walter later comments on how that is only during spring break and that "the rest of the

566:

Uh, you are allowed to go topless in New York (both men and women). "In summary, the People have offered nothing to justify a law that discriminates against women by prohibiting them from removing their tops and exposing their bare chests in public as men are routinely permitted to do. The mere fact

341:

I figured it meant not hardcore sex type of things. To my understanding, their videos only go as far as touching and girl-girl licking/fingering/etc and all that. I think "limited" is probably the wrong word, but the message they were trying to say is that there's sexual stuff going on, but (as far

763:

Who on earth is Lauren Shackelford, and why is she credited with founding the GGW franchise?! Her name has been added back to this article on more than one occasion (by otherwise responsible registered users) to replace Joe Francis's, but the only evidence that she is or was involved in GGW is this

682:

this area had a bit that said joe francis' recent legal actions inspired a Law & Order: Special Victims Unit episode. While it seems logical it is in fact wrong it was actually the original series of the franchise Law & Order that had the episode inspired by those incidences. so i changed it

622:

et al do not necessarily apply in all cases and circumstances, and that "appellants' conduct was obviously intended as a political statement" and that this being recognized by the court influenced the court's decision, and probably explains the suggestion that the case was not vigorously prosecuted,

460:

The section is true, oh nameless inquisitor. They're not necessarily the same type of deal as Girls Gone Wild, i.e., they're not for sale anywhere that I know of, unless maybe as a bootleg in New York or something. They're downloaded, and feature the Girls Gone Wild 3D logo and T-shirts sometimes,

1671:

Seriously. What is "101+"? Is it 102? 103? I'm guessing at some point the company advertised that they had "over 101!!!" titles. At the moment, we list, by my count, 305. I don't know that this is correct (not that it matters), so I am using the round figure of 300 and "over". If we could determine

1007:

I will be working on this article for the next several days. I notice there are some original research and citation needed issues, and the lead section is pretty undeveloped considering the length of this article. There's also some dead references, and some references are to IMDb or Amazon, so I'll

987:

There are so many films from the GGW collection that it would take forever to cite them all. If there a a dozen or so that are cited and the rest are not, is there still cause to leave the "unsourced material" tag under that section? If so, any suggestions on an easier way to cite them all? Thanks.

555:

and it's a B misdemeanor, and frankly I'm a little offended by the indulgent, apologetic tone of some of the writing in this article. And I don't think Knowledge (XXG) should be celebrating the success of an outfit that's been compelled to pay million dollar fines for scamming people and violating

471:

Okay, thanks for clearing that up, but the Knockoffs section names GGW: On Campus and GGW: College Girls Exposed as fakes, but I own DVDs of both of those, they are obviously legitimate, you can even buy them on Amazon. I'd edit that part myself, but whenever I change anything on this page somebody

442:

It seems to me there's something moderately important missing from this page, a reference to a (I believe) federal case regarding a young woman (but of age) who sign a release for her images to be in a Girls Gone Wild video (who later sought to block release and distribution). The judge (herself a

1326:

After a look through Google Books the hits do seem to be mostly for the porn franchise. The franchise seems to be a key reference work for gender studies/sexual politics type texts, so apart from the higher number of page accesses it also seems to have more off-wiki encyclopedic coverage. It looks

917:

Under Content: "If they touch their breasts or genitals or another person's, it is considered pornography, under U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 2257 and is regulated, as such." I've seen plenty of movies where breasts are touched and they're definitely not considered pornographic. I think this needs

745:

Someone just edited the article to say that Oregon has no laws on public nudity or indecent exposure. After a little digging around, I found: "ORS 163.465: (1) A person commits the crime of public indecency if while in, or in view of, a public place the person performs: (c) An act of exposing the

571:

for a classification that expressly discriminates on the basis of sex (see, Kirchberg v. Feenstra, 450 U.S. 455, 461, 101 S.Ct. 1195, 1998, 67 L.Ed.2d 428). Accordingly, the gender-based classification established by Penal Law § 245.01 violates appellants' equal protection rights and, for that

417:

on Google which sounds like it's probably the case they're talking about. It sounds like there wasn't any sexual activity involved (like it says in that quote) for at least the tapes they checked out. It sounds like in this case the worst thing on the tapes was just some nudity and not any

1252:. The film has far more historical value than a porn franchise, regardless of how popular porn is (and the difference isn't large enough to want me to change my mind, if it was 10:1 I would accept the views for primary topic). Google Books shows that the difference in book hits is minimal 1426:

I don't think it's a particularly valid point either. Page hits is a sufficient argument for moving an article provided there isn't a counter-argument that the other article(s) have more encylcopedic significance. For instance, if the 1929 film was as historically significant as

1578:

If primary topic is denied in a case as clear cut as this, it is hard to see the point of having a guideline of this type. Since the most important purpose of a title is to tell the reader the name of the subject, leaving off the parenthetical is obviously a step forward.

780:"However, toplessness in itself is not protection against arrest; it is possible for women to be arrested for violating other criminal statues while topless, and many of the women featured in Girls Gone Wild commit other acts in public that could be cause for arrest." 961:

time it's Girls Gone Saggy, then Girls Gone Senile, and then it's just Girls Gone." You have two that's in this sentence "Jeff mentions that (after this performance) then another that. This is incorrect grammer. I would consider changing this.-James Pandora Adams

1446:

Disagree. The onus is on the proponents of the move to provide a valid argument, which I don't think has been done. Disagree that page statistics, on their own, are a valid argument. But it's a very interesting point, and one which IMO is in need of discussion.

1160:

templates should be put on disambiguation page proposed to be moved. Putting the template on one of the pages listed, in this case the pornography article, tilts the alerts. Done like this WP Film editors won't see the proposed move.

1431:

but had still had fewer page hits then that would be an effective counter-argument that page hits are not an effective discriminant in this particular case, but the onus is on Andrewa to formulate that counter-argument.

638:

It seems odd that this kind of porn is allowed to advertise on regular TV. I'm not against people watching/making/etc porn but I do get tired of all the stupid commercials that don't seem to air only after dark now.

2010: 749:

Since conviction under this statute makes one eligible for the chemical castration pilot program (oh, joy!), I thought I'd revert that last edit, lest any Oregonians go wild and live to regret it.

1493:. It's getting a bit involved, but my contention is that the onus is on proponents to provide a valid case, and that page views alone don't provide this (as someone else said recently, they show 1796: 1949: 1629: 481:

He's right, they're both legit, i'm changing the section to reflect it. (I'm grumbling because whoever wrote this article seems so uninformed as to what they're writing about it disgusts me.)

625:

ultimately this case has nothing to do with drunken co-eds getting a little "wild" and a little "crazy" and exposing themselves lewdly in public for the benefit of a commercial enterprise.

278: 168: 1511:

The "onus" rule seems to be one that you just made up. I think it is clear that no amount of evidence could ever overcome the alleged onus, so the rule essentially negates the entire

412:

In 2004 in Panama City, Florida, a judge ruled that video footage of females under the age of 18 exposing their breasts, without physical or sexual contact, is not child pornography.

1555:

help to support the determination of a primary topic in a discussion (but are not considered absolute determining factors, due to unreliability, potential bias, and other reasons)

1065:

guidelines do not provide for comparative notability between article topics. No article is more or less notable than another. Thus, the rationale has no standing in WP policy.

2000: 1962:

You still haven't provided a source, him being a fan isn't important enough to note, and if this is something he said, it's very likely a joke, given that he's a comedian.

619:

And, you know, I almost forgot, but since you're quoting case law, let's not forget to mention that the statute still stands, and that the specifics of NY v. Santorelli

1848: 1844: 1830: 1473:(but please don't reformat the existing posts including mine, that will just risk making matters worse IMO, it's clear enough as is, just not as good as it should be). 784:

I think I know what you meant but it was too vaguely written. Surely, one cannot expect immunity if one were to rob a bank while topless... ? And, by the way, it's

1953: 140: 1575:

That's not what I meant by "negating the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC guideline," as I suspect you already know. The porn franchise gets 87 times the traffic of the 1929 film.

671:

Because it's supposed to be an encyclopedia, a non-bias source of information, not a place for users to put their personal opinions on the subject in question --

2020: 1995: 130: 1797:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130304110200/http://www.collegehumor.com:80/article/1410034/guys-gone-wild-a-comparative-study-for-the-well-versed-pornographist

2025: 1267: 1257: 700: 320: 2005: 106: 1388: 1305:

If you look at the hits for the "film" they appear in books about stripping and "underage" girls, so I bet they are not referring to the 1929 film.

333: 1800: 1253: 918:

expanding to explain the difference between movies and these videos, for those who have the knowledge. I'm sure a lot of folks do not understand.

1990: 1387:. The only evidence of this being the primary topic seems to be pageviews, and the proponents have said that no other evidence is required. 872: 646: 532: 1123:

per the pageviews. The DAB's latest views are 2113. The film's? 544. This is definite proof the current setup is inconveniencing readers.

97: 58: 1248:

porn gets more page views... surprise surprise. However I'm going to call on the long term encyclopaedic and educational value clause of

1048:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a

968: 899: 726: 704: 2030: 2015: 852: 427: 355: 253: 1633: 213: 1826:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

941: 825: 795: 1806: 457:

This whole section looks like somebody's paranoid delusion. Where is the evidence, aside from the variable quality of the videos?

1270: 1816: 1699:

sources listing any of them. Why? Because the segment of society that cases is tiny. Lots of people bought Beanie Babies, read

516:

I would tend to agree. A Guru is different 'animal' (for want of a better word). This guy just uses DRTV (Direct Response TV).

33: 89: 834: 572:

reason, I concur in the majority's result and vote to reverse the order below." (from NY v. Santorelli, 1992). Choke on it.

1348:

obviously contributes to the perceived notability of the franchise, but it's still lightyears more notable than the film.--

1194:

I really wish you'd just give up with that pointless fallacy already. Google Books does not take priority over page views.

548:

I don't know about the rest of the world, but here in New York exposing yourself in public is a violation of the Penal Law

750: 225: 217: 221: 208: 163: 1891: 105:-related topics on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 1647: 1039: 1945: 1911: 1780: 1264: 1084: 1345: 1180:

no benefit to readers, although porn gets more pageviews, it is the 1929 film or other subjects more found in books.

329: 1584: 1520: 1409: 1296: 1218: 1847:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

1801:

http://www.collegehumor.com/article/1410034/guys-gone-wild-a-comparative-study-for-the-well-versed-pornographist

1691:

Oooo, "But the titles are listed on IMDb/Amazon/ebay/whatever." Yes, so are all of the Beanie Babies, issues of

1609: 1544: 1512: 1366: 1249: 1021: 876: 650: 1657: 1370: 1049: 528: 39: 903: 325: 1882: 1788: 1185: 1166: 972: 856: 730: 708: 1062: 964: 945: 937: 848: 799: 791: 722: 642: 520: 1128: 423: 351: 524: 401: 1866:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1854: 1437: 1353: 1332: 1310: 845:

How come the first film was released in 1905 if the founder of the company is in his thirties in 2009?

719:

Been there done that, this is everything I know, perhaps everyone who knows references could add them?

1787:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1538: 1213:. The franchise has more pageviews, per Nohomersryan. GBooks is indirect metric compared to pageviews. 697:

could we put that here somewhere, I mean there has been numerous references to GGW in popular culture.

443:

woman, I believe) issued a lengthy and not terribly sympathetic written opinion, dismissing the claim.

400:

Can anyone provide a reference on the 'minors exposing their breasts in public isn't child porn' idea?

1433: 1328: 1306: 573: 1967: 1923: 1580: 1516: 1405: 1292: 1214: 1070: 993: 498: 462: 1013: 1009: 569:

is not sufficient to satisfy the state's burden of showing an ``exceedingly persuasive justification

301:

Deleted comment from talk page because it was a personal comment about the product not the article.

21: 1231: 1017: 684: 268: 1466: 1462: 549: 302: 1613: 1374: 1181: 1162: 1145: 919: 1851:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

482: 369: 1867: 1807:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120214015818/http://www.ftc.gov:80/opa/2003/12/girlsgonewild.shtm

1404:

A vote should evaluate the relative merits of the arguments, not complain about other editors.

346:." unless you've seen one of the videos and saw them doing sexual stuff with their boyfriend. 1566: 1502: 1478: 1452: 1395: 1199: 1124: 1110: 627: 611: 586: 557: 419: 347: 259: 1817:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120728095620/http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/07/girlsgonewild.shtm

1349: 895: 816: 386: 1874: 1963: 1919: 1093: 1088: 1066: 989: 494: 444: 1696: 1971: 1957: 1927: 1896: 1763: 1744: 1728: 1637: 1620: 1588: 1570: 1524: 1506: 1482: 1456: 1441: 1413: 1399: 1379: 1357: 1336: 1314: 1300: 1276: 1240: 1230:. The porn franchise doesn't have a shred of notability in comparison to 1929 film. — 1222: 1203: 1189: 1170: 1149: 1132: 1114: 1074: 1025: 997: 976: 949: 924: 907: 880: 860: 803: 768: 753: 734: 712: 687: 654: 630: 614: 589: 576: 560: 502: 485: 465: 447: 431: 404: 389: 372: 359: 305: 1833:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 415: 1873:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1840: 1984: 1820: 1810: 1141: 315:

what does it mean when it has Limited in pharentheses by the word sex? just curious..

1941: 1907: 1576: 1562: 1498: 1474: 1448: 1391: 1289: 1286: 1195: 1106: 672: 546:

Legally, exposing oneself in a public area constitutes no expectation of privacy...

512:

How objective is the title Media Guru? I would hardly call this guy a media guru.

778:

My apologies to the person who wrote this sentence but I saw a need to change it:

620: 212:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 765: 200: 102: 83: 73: 52: 1839:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1656:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a

891: 190: 184: 157: 79: 1549:

is over the top IMO. The guideline describes page statistics as one of the

1105:– The 1929 film doesn't have a shred of notability in comparison to this. 229: 890:

Wasn't there sort of a parody of Girls Gone Wild in the recent movie "

381:"i'd appreciate a hand." Why are your's too busy whatching the tapes? 1937: 871:

Are they episodic, series, movie or none of the aforementioned? --

567:

that the statute's aim is the protection of ``public sensibilities

1933: 1703:, watch porn, watch "Let's Make a Deal", etc. Virtually no one 815:

Shouldn't it say vulva instead of vagina? To be fully correct.

262:

in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

258:

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the

15: 267: 493:

This section was poorly written and so I fixed some of it.

1791:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

385:

rofl, owned (Please sign your comments in the future btw)

1285:

The ratio here is way higher than 10:1. It's 22,724 views

1471:...Generally colons and asterisks should not be mixed... 934:

is this hard porn, borderline hard porn or soft porn??

1918:

Because it's unsourced, irrelevant, and likely a joke.

1784: 1463:

discussing the contributor rather than the contribution

1098: 2011:

Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings

1646:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

1676:

305, we could state 305. We would not state "304+".

101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1843:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1557:(emphasis as per the guideline). Who is seeking to 1489:Agree; Exactly. And what I am trying to do here is 1344:, far more google search results in books and web. 1291:"Not porn" is not the same thing as "educational." 1052:. No further edits should be made to this section. 898:

and whose character is based off of Joe Francis? --

1660:. No further edits should be made to this section. 1821:http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/07/girlsgonewild.shtm 1811:http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/12/girlsgonewild.shtm 1495:what people found, not what they were looking for 1012:to this article, hopefully my efforts bring some 1008:work on that too. Overall, there's an underlying 228:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1829:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 2001:C-Class High-importance Pornography articles 1695:, etc. There are not, however, independent 1537:any argument, that seems to me to be pure 1461:And at the risk of being accused again of 1038:The following is a closed discussion of a 224:. To use this banner, please refer to the 152: 47: 1779:I have just modified 3 external links on 1535:no amount of evidence could ever overcome 1491:evaluate relative merits of the arguments 585:Choke on it? Oh, right. Nicely put. 154: 115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pornography 49: 19: 1288:for the franchise to 116 for the film. 668:Get over it! Why delete it? -Rage1138 1950:2600:8800:5E00:6A2:F97B:D537:FAFC:705 1630:2601:541:4204:7760:5C6:1B12:8340:590A 7: 2021:Start-Class American cinema articles 1996:High-importance Pornography articles 1734:Last call before I dump the list. - 1057:The result of the move request was: 206:This article is within the scope of 95:This article is within the scope of 2026:American cinema task force articles 472:else just changes it back again... 38:It is of interest to the following 1906:Why did you remove the part about 1711:in the first week of August 2004. 774:Toplessness and criminal liability 260:project-independent quality rating 14: 1783:. Please take a moment to review 1061:- a comment on nom's rationale. 410:I assume that's in reference to " 276:This article is supported by the 2006:WikiProject Pornography articles 1529:Not quite sure what you mean by 1099:Girls Gone Wild (disambiguation) 238:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film 222:regional and topical task forces 193: 183: 156: 118:Template:WikiProject Pornography 82: 72: 51: 20: 1543:essentially negates the entire 1533:. It's certainly not true that 135:This article has been rated as 1327:like the primary topic to me. 925:16:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC) 693:Girls Gone Wild in pop culture 90:Erotica and pornography portal 1: 836:06:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 735:22:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC) 655:19:43, 11 November 2007 (UTC) 561:18:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC) 432:04:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 405:02:56, 24 February 2006 (UTC) 360:21:03, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 1991:C-Class Pornography articles 1936:, also did you think it was 1897:09:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC) 1541:. And to claim that my view 894:" called "Wild Wild Girls", 881:01:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC) 769:13:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC) 688:05:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC) 503:06:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 1781:Girls Gone Wild (franchise) 1469:, especially paragraph two 1085:Girls Gone Wild (franchise) 1031:Requested move 1 April 2016 1026:00:00, 4 October 2012 (UTC) 950:08:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC) 908:15:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC) 306:00:15, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 2047: 1860:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1776:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1638:19:20, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 1621:14:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 1589:07:38, 11 April 2016 (UTC) 1571:06:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC) 1525:22:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 1507:18:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 1483:18:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 1457:18:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 1075:14:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC) 977:22:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC) 804:03:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC) 713:18:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 678:Criticism and Legal Action 631:07:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 615:22:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 590:22:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 577:21:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 279:American cinema task force 141:project's importance scale 2031:WikiProject Film articles 2016:Start-Class film articles 1729:15:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 1608:not going better to be a 1442:13:27, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 1414:12:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 1400:11:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 1380:00:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC) 1358:22:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 1337:20:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 1315:20:39, 5 April 2016 (UTC) 1301:13:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC) 1277:08:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC) 1241:02:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC) 1223:15:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC) 1204:17:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC) 1190:12:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC) 1171:13:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC) 1158:Misplaced template, again 1150:03:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC) 1133:14:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC) 1115:13:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC) 861:18:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 754:03:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC) 535:) 12:36, February 8, 2007 486:17:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 466:06:19, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 448:04:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC) 373:17:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC) 275: 257: 241:Template:WikiProject Film 178: 134: 67: 46: 1972:13:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC) 1958:19:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC) 1932:Why do you think it's a 1928:09:54, 5 June 2020 (UTC) 1764:04:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC) 1745:04:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC) 1707:who was on the cover of 1653:Please do not modify it. 1045:Please do not modify it. 998:19:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC) 751:Poindexter Propellerhead 390:19:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 1772:External links modified 418:pornographic stuff. -- 98:WikiProject Pornography 272: 28:This article is rated 1940:? Personally I think 1389:It's not that simple. 703:comment was added by 271: 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1841:regular verification 1693:Entertainment Weekly 323:comment was added by 121:Pornography articles 1831:After February 2018 1705:must know right now 602:Oh, and by the way: 326:User:70.173.94.209 214:join the discussion 1885:InternetArchiveBot 1836:InternetArchiveBot 1628:leave dab as base 886:Piranha 3D Parody? 759:Lauren Shackelford 273: 34:content assessment 1861: 1346:WP:SYSTEMATICBIAS 1258:1370 for the porn 967:comment added by 940:comment added by 923: 851:comment added by 830: 806: 794:comment added by 737: 725:comment added by 716: 657: 645:comment added by 537: 523:comment added by 337: 311:Meaning of phrase 294: 293: 290: 289: 286: 285: 216:and see lists of 151: 150: 147: 146: 2038: 1895: 1886: 1859: 1858: 1837: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1727: 1724: 1721: 1655: 1618: 1531:the alleged onus 1377: 1275: 1254:820 for the film 1238: 1237: 1101: 1047: 979: 952: 922: 863: 831: 828: 821: 789: 720: 698: 640: 536: 517: 316: 246: 245: 242: 239: 236: 209:WikiProject Film 203: 198: 197: 196: 187: 180: 179: 174: 171: 160: 153: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 2046: 2045: 2041: 2040: 2039: 2037: 2036: 2035: 1981: 1980: 1948:is hilarious -- 1946:Girls Gone Wild 1912:Girls Gone Wild 1904: 1889: 1884: 1852: 1845:have permission 1835: 1789:this simple FaQ 1774: 1760: 1757: 1754: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1725: 1722: 1719: 1672:that there are 1669: 1664: 1651: 1614: 1581:Brother Twisted 1545:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1517:Brother Twisted 1513:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1406:Brother Twisted 1375: 1367:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1293:Brother Twisted 1261: 1250:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC 1233: 1232: 1215:Brother Twisted 1097: 1094:Girls Gone Wild 1089:Girls Gone Wild 1043: 1033: 1005: 985: 962: 958: 935: 932: 915: 913:Porno statement 896:Jerry O'Connell 888: 869: 846: 843: 833: 826: 817: 813: 776: 761: 743: 699:—The preceding 695: 680: 666: 617: 553:Public Lewdness 543: 518: 510: 455: 440: 398: 313: 299: 243: 240: 237: 234: 233: 199: 194: 192: 172: 166: 137:High-importance 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 62:High‑importance 61: 29: 12: 11: 5: 2044: 2042: 2034: 2033: 2028: 2023: 2018: 2013: 2008: 2003: 1998: 1993: 1983: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1903: 1900: 1879: 1878: 1871: 1824: 1823: 1815:Added archive 1813: 1805:Added archive 1803: 1795:Added archive 1773: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1748: 1747: 1716: 1715: 1689: 1688: 1681: 1680: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1662: 1648:requested move 1642: 1641: 1640: 1623: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1465:, please read 1459: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1416: 1382: 1371:WP:NOTCENSORED 1360: 1339: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1303: 1280: 1279: 1243: 1225: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1153: 1152: 1135: 1103: 1102: 1091: 1080: 1078: 1055: 1054: 1040:requested move 1034: 1032: 1029: 1018:Blueskymorning 1004: 1001: 984: 981: 957: 954: 931: 928: 914: 911: 887: 884: 873:173.183.102.95 868: 865: 842: 839: 824: 812: 808: 775: 772: 760: 757: 742: 739: 694: 691: 679: 676: 665: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 647:76.184.241.144 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 595: 594: 593: 592: 580: 579: 556:federal law. 542: 539: 525:121.44.239.164 509: 506: 491: 490: 489: 488: 475: 470: 454: 451: 439: 436: 435: 434: 402:69.154.177.104 397: 394: 393: 392: 380: 378: 377: 376: 375: 363: 362: 344:or a boyfriend 319:The preceding 312: 309: 298: 295: 292: 291: 288: 287: 284: 283: 274: 264: 263: 256: 250: 249: 247: 205: 204: 188: 176: 175: 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2043: 2032: 2029: 2027: 2024: 2022: 2019: 2017: 2014: 2012: 2009: 2007: 2004: 2002: 1999: 1997: 1994: 1992: 1989: 1988: 1986: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1960: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1913: 1909: 1901: 1899: 1898: 1893: 1888: 1887: 1876: 1872: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1856: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1838: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1812: 1808: 1804: 1802: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1777: 1771: 1765: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1675: 1666: 1661: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1619: 1617: 1616:ApprenticeFan 1611: 1610:primary topic 1607: 1604: 1603: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1577: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1561:this? Not I! 1560: 1556: 1554: 1548: 1546: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1361: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1340: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1278: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1244: 1242: 1239: 1236: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1187: 1183: 1182:In ictu oculi 1179: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163:In ictu oculi 1159: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1100: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063:WP:Notability 1060: 1053: 1051: 1046: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1030: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1002: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 983:List of Films 982: 980: 978: 974: 970: 969:71.176.152.59 966: 955: 953: 951: 947: 943: 939: 929: 927: 926: 921: 920:MagnoliaSouth 912: 910: 909: 905: 901: 900:71.70.140.119 897: 893: 885: 883: 882: 878: 874: 866: 864: 862: 858: 854: 850: 840: 838: 837: 835:_vulva?": --> 832: 822: 820: 810:Vagina =: --> 809: 807: 805: 801: 797: 793: 787: 782: 781: 773: 771: 770: 767: 758: 756: 755: 752: 747: 740: 738: 736: 732: 728: 727:86.91.205.176 724: 717: 714: 710: 706: 705:68.89.176.176 702: 692: 690: 689: 686: 677: 675: 674: 669: 663: 656: 652: 648: 644: 637: 636: 635: 634: 633: 632: 629: 626: 621: 616: 613: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 591: 588: 584: 583: 582: 581: 578: 575: 570: 565: 564: 563: 562: 559: 554: 550: 547: 540: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 513: 507: 505: 504: 500: 496: 487: 484: 480: 479: 478: 477: 476: 473: 468: 467: 464: 458: 452: 450: 449: 446: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 416: 413: 409: 408: 407: 406: 403: 395: 391: 388: 384: 383: 382: 374: 371: 367: 366: 365: 364: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 340: 339: 338: 335: 331: 327: 324: 322: 310: 308: 307: 304: 296: 281: 280: 270: 266: 265: 261: 255: 252: 251: 248: 244:film articles 231: 227: 226:documentation 223: 219: 215: 211: 210: 202: 191: 189: 186: 182: 181: 177: 170: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1942:Beck Bennett 1908:Beck Bennett 1905: 1902:Beck Bennett 1883: 1880: 1855:source check 1834: 1828: 1825: 1778: 1775: 1718:Comemnts? - 1717: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1692: 1690: 1682: 1673: 1670: 1667:"101+ Films" 1652: 1645: 1625: 1615: 1605: 1558: 1552: 1550: 1542: 1534: 1530: 1494: 1490: 1470: 1429:Citizen Kane 1428: 1384: 1362: 1341: 1323: 1268:CleverPhrase 1263: 1262: 1256:compared to 1245: 1234: 1227: 1210: 1177: 1157: 1155: 1154: 1137: 1125:Nohomersryan 1120: 1104: 1079: 1058: 1056: 1044: 1037: 1006: 986: 959: 956:Jeff Dunham! 933: 916: 889: 870: 853:89.138.47.86 844: 818: 814: 785: 783: 779: 777: 762: 748: 744: 718: 696: 681: 670: 667: 628:Cryptonymius 624: 618: 612:Cryptonymius 587:Cryptonymius 568: 558:Cryptonymius 552: 551:section 245 545: 544: 514: 511: 492: 474: 469: 459: 456: 441: 438:Federal Case 420:Atari2600tim 411: 399: 379: 348:Atari2600tim 343: 318: 314: 300: 277: 207: 136: 96: 40:WikiProjects 1658:move review 1551:tools that 1515:guideline. 1434:Betty Logan 1350:Prisencolin 1329:Betty Logan 1307:Betty Logan 1178:And, oppose 1050:move review 963:—Preceding 942:58.213.7.98 936:—Preceding 847:—Preceding 841:Date error? 819:Aar☢n Bruce 796:69.132.20.2 790:—Preceding 741:Oregon Laws 721:—Preceding 664:On deletion 641:—Preceding 574:ChairmanSac 519:—Preceding 508:Media Guru? 414:" I found 396:Legal Claim 387:DurotarLord 201:Film portal 173:Start‑class 112:Pornography 103:pornography 59:Pornography 1985:Categories 1964:Trivialist 1920:Trivialist 1892:Report bug 1369:, and per 1067:Mike Cline 990:Morning277 892:Piranha 3D 764:article. 495:Gingermint 463:75.2.11.89 453:Knockoffs? 445:Blondlieut 230:guidelines 218:open tasks 1875:this tool 1868:this tool 1547:guideline 1467:WP:thread 1235:AjaxSmack 1059:Not moved 1010:confusion 1003:Revisions 623:and that 1881:Cheers.— 1753:Done. - 1697:reliable 1539:rhetoric 1365:– clear 1142:Dicklyon 965:unsigned 938:unsigned 849:unsigned 792:unsigned 786:statutes 723:unsigned 701:unsigned 685:Stellrmn 643:unsigned 533:contribs 521:unsigned 428:contribs 356:contribs 334:contribs 321:unsigned 297:Untitled 169:American 1944:liking 1910:liking 1785:my edit 1674:exactly 1563:Andrewa 1499:Andrewa 1475:Andrewa 1449:Andrewa 1392:Andrewa 1363:Support 1342:Support 1324:Support 1211:Support 1196:Unreal7 1121:Support 1107:Unreal7 1014:clarity 829:ontribs 673:btg2290 303:Onthost 139:on the 30:C-class 1626:Oppose 1606:Oppose 1559:negate 1385:Oppose 1265:Insert 1246:Oppose 1228:Oppose 1138:Oppose 811:vulva? 766:Beeeej 36:scale. 1938:funny 1376:flyer 1373:. SST 930:filth 867:forms 515:: --> 483:CodyM 370:CodyM 254:Start 1968:talk 1954:talk 1934:joke 1924:talk 1634:talk 1585:talk 1567:talk 1521:talk 1503:talk 1479:talk 1453:talk 1438:talk 1410:talk 1396:talk 1354:talk 1333:talk 1311:talk 1297:talk 1271:Here 1219:talk 1200:talk 1186:talk 1167:talk 1146:talk 1129:talk 1111:talk 1071:talk 1022:talk 994:talk 973:talk 946:talk 904:talk 877:talk 857:talk 800:talk 731:talk 709:talk 651:talk 541:POV? 529:talk 499:talk 424:talk 352:talk 330:talk 235:Film 220:and 164:Film 131:High 1849:RfC 1819:to 1809:to 1799:to 1761:PhD 1758:mer 1755:Sum 1742:PhD 1739:mer 1736:Sum 1726:PhD 1723:mer 1720:Sum 1650:. 1553:may 1497:). 336:) . 1987:: 1970:) 1956:) 1926:) 1914:? 1862:. 1857:}} 1853:{{ 1709:EW 1701:EW 1636:) 1612:. 1587:) 1569:) 1523:) 1505:) 1481:) 1455:) 1440:) 1412:) 1398:) 1356:) 1335:) 1313:) 1299:) 1221:) 1202:) 1188:) 1169:) 1148:) 1131:) 1113:) 1096:→ 1087:→ 1073:) 1042:. 1024:) 1016:. 996:) 988:-- 975:) 948:) 906:) 879:) 859:) 802:) 788:. 733:) 711:) 653:) 531:• 501:) 430:) 426:• 358:) 354:• 332:• 167:: 1966:( 1952:( 1922:( 1894:) 1890:( 1877:. 1870:. 1632:( 1583:( 1565:( 1519:( 1501:( 1477:( 1451:( 1436:( 1408:( 1394:( 1352:( 1331:( 1309:( 1295:( 1217:( 1198:( 1184:( 1165:( 1156:* 1144:( 1127:( 1109:( 1069:( 1020:( 992:( 971:( 944:( 902:( 875:( 855:( 827:C 823:/ 798:( 729:( 715:. 707:( 649:( 527:( 497:( 422:( 350:( 328:( 317:— 282:. 232:. 143:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index