71:
53:
1721:, and covered by reliable sources we should abandon all sense, logic and formality and simply go with what sources say? That's not what Knowledge (XXG) is nor is it encyclopaedic, professional or formal. We have the MOS for consistency. Local consensus should not outweight MOS otherwise anyone can get together any band of mates and strong arm a project or topic into accepting a style or point of view not represented anywhere else. The MOS is also designed to prevent this daft situation we're now in where there's two works, both containing the word
230:
121:
1498:
completely different from a COMMONNAME question, like whether the article should be titled "Girls like You" or "Some Girls like You" because both conflicting titles were on different releases of the same song (to make up an example). COMMONNAME has nothing to do with style questions, or MoS simply would not exist (or at least would never apply to title questions; but of course we apply it dozens of times per day to title questions).
152:
1334:"so as not to include myself in Knowledge (XXG)'s ridiculousness" – The closer should be clear that Randy Kryn is making an argument against the guideline existing, not against the guideline applying in this case. The editor is well aware that if he wants to change the guideline, e.g. to capitalize prepositions of four letters or more instead of five, that the place to propose that is the guideline talk page or
22:
744:
1362:, no, I'm fine with the guideline, and it seems to work well in most cases. Yet every guideline begins with the statement about common sense exceptions, and I've always contended that this guideline introduction language actually dictates that some common sense exceptions should exist. This is one. Uppercase should prevail, per no sources existing which lowercase the name of the song, and
791:
645:. Then the final opposer says they don't actually know what the rules are. So, FAIL. The close is flat-out wrong. You cannot declare that a site-wide guideline doesn't have consensus on the basis of four people making invalid arguments that don't even address whether it has consensus. It would take a massive RfC at
1397:
330:– There are two possible meanings of the phrase "girls like you" - (1) "like" is a verb, and it is someone telling another person that girls like them; and (2) "like" is a preposition, and is the phrase is part of a larger sentence in which someone tells a girl what girls like her are prone to do. Looking at
595:
Yes, this should be re-RMed, since it directly conflicts with every other "like as a preposition" case. This is something we've been over many, many times at RM, and with a consistent lower-case result. What I note above is that various editors have showed up to recycle the same arguments that were
2099:
folks... AGF! I started the discussion on the basis of trying to maintain some sense of consistency with their prior release "Moves like Jagger" but clearly people feel strongly about it and more sources than not capitalise it, so it looks like it will close as a pretty-evenly split (maintain status
2082:
explicitly says to "Apply our five-letter rule (above) for prepositions except when a significant majority of current, reliable sources that are independent of the subject consistently capitalize, in the title of a specific work, a word that is frequently not a preposition, as in 'Like' and 'Past'."
1549:
Apply our five-letter rule except when a significant majority of current, reliable sources that are independent of the subject consistently capitalize, in the title of a specific work, a word that is frequently not a preposition, as in "Like" and "Past". Continue to lower-case common four-letter (or
626:
as a matter of policy. Most book publishers use a five-letter rule (as does WP), and academic ones use a never-capitalize-any-prepositions rule, so by the time this gets mentioned in books and in music or popular culture journals, they render it "like" in this song's title. The appearance of source
1582:
which lowercase the "like". The MOS has always been a useful guideline for the majority of cases, but it is also clear that it shouldn't make up styling not found in reliable sources, and the proposition plus the support votes here haven't addressed this point at all, which was the crux of the last
1552:
That is, if there is such a majority (an empirical matter which can be debated; so far, one participant offers evidence arguing that it is true, and none argues it is false), then "Like" should be capitalized even though it is being used as a preposition. Of course, several RM participants now were
1497:
Yes, the obvious fault in this "populist" reasoning is that most of the sources for something like this are entertainment news publications, 99% of which follow a four-letter-rule style guide. It doesn't mean anything other than that there are different style guides (and we have our own). This is
1456:
be capitalised. The word like is given as an example. In this context Like is used as a preposition rather than a verb. We can't have local consensuses that are not based on our policies guidance or Manual of Style. The previous RM was procedurally incorrect. None of the reasons given for opposing
1031:
not being capitalised. I'm not sure we need a consensus to apply the MOS. At the moment, the existing situation means a local consensus based on opinion with no procedural or factual backing overrules the MOS, meaning that the target article is the exception to the rule for no reason other than a
1319:
per sources overwhelmingly uppercasing (has anyone lowercased?), this being listed as a major all-time song, per the 2018 RM and its finely written close, and I have to at least register an 'oppose' when I saw this RM so as not to include myself in
Knowledge (XXG)'s ridiculousness in lowercasing
1809:
to demonstrate this is the common title. I don't believe that is how common title was intended to be portrayed or used. The decision is to capitalise L is a stylistic choice - that's the very point I am trying to make. IMO (and my experience of editing for years now), the MOS is unequivocal and
914:
There seems to be a consensus to follow the MOS here from both sides. Originally, the RM was made under the assumption that capital "Like" violated the MOS, but that was refuted by further examination of the MOS to discover an exception where "Like" is permitted to be capitalized if independent
1519:
All well and good, but do you have a reputable source that lowercases? Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be source based, but the five-letter rule often ignores that. Ignoring one rule in favor of another usually works well when
Knowledge (XXG)-tradition extends into overturning the abundance of
1605:
use the same preposition in the same way one is capitalised, the other isn't. If we go by that logic, then if an artist releases a song styled all in capitals or all in lowercase and all RS refer to it in that way then we should ignore the MOS. The whole point of MOS is to ensure clarity and
142:
1461:
been obtained by counting votes. Someone saying "opposed" based on their personal opinion or preference is worthless versus a "support" vote based on clear rule, guidance, procedure or MOS. We're not a news article or news source, who quite often stray from capitalisation rules.
1702:
lol (which I only write if I'm lol) at "apples and organs". When no outside
Knowledge (XXG) examples exist for a certain named song then where is the expected encyclopedic accuracy? If the sources were mixed, such as in "Moves like Jagger", I wouldn't have posted on this RM.
483:. The MOS is clear on this point, and most of the opposes here don't have much grounding, but it hasn't been clear for years whether the MOS really represents community consensus on this word in particular. For example, there's the extensive evidence of
487:. I'm not sure it's worth changing one of these without discussing the hundreds of other capitalized instances of "Like" in article titles, and I'm pretty sure discussing the hundreds together wouldn't lead to a consensus to change the titles either.
1971:
Commoname applies to the words and title of the page, it does not preclude or override MOS. Common name is a guidance piece/policy, TITLECAPS is a a part of MOS. One is about content, the other is about how said content is displayed and presented.
1387:
per Randy Kryn, the previous RM, and the OVERWHELMING majority of sources. The band is allowed to title their song however they like and not be second-guessed, and they clearly capitalize "Like", and this is not a stylization. See the famous
1451:
Poor rational tbh - just because media and news outlets use a certain type of capitalisation doesn't mean we follow suit. Knowledge (XXG) is encyclopaedic and formal in tone. Our style manual says prepositions 4 letters or under should
292:
points out it isn't clear if it has community consensus. Their point that if the issue as a whole was brought to the community that there would likely be no consensus is well taken. Perhaps this is a discussion to have at
1780:
have in fact used the title that way, causing it to be used as the title in
Knowledge (XXG)? I think the entire point of the policy is that sources overwhelmingly tend to ignore such stying and identify such things with
1032:
group of editors voted it should. This is an affront to the encyclopaedic format of
Knowledge (XXG) when other articles with similar prepositions have to follow this rule. It seems like an obvious case of
1725:, both using the word as a preposition in the same way but both using different stylisations (one caps, one not). That's what it is at the end of the day, stylisation. Its the same reason we don't display
1421:
is a play on words, forming both a sentence and a subtitle simultaneously; this is the reason why it remains "Into" on WP. Nothing like that is going on here. What we have here is exactly the same case as
566:
I would also agree that the 'like' should be lowercase. I'm shocked by the overwhelming consensus for the opposite in the above discussion when the MoS is very clear about this and clear-cut examples like
484:
608:: just keep recycling the same consensus-rejected idea over and over again until you get lucky and a random closer who isn't looking very closely buys into it. Anyway, next time lead with
1392:
debate where the "strictly lowercase any 4 letter preposition no matter what the sources say" lost out in a well-attended, high consensus case, which should not be lightly set aside to a
618:
Going over this, all of the rationales are invalid. How many sources are using "Like" is irrelevant in a four-letter preposition case when 99.9% of them are news, since
1520:
sources, but in this case, as in several others, if not one reputable source can be found lowercasing the word in question then applying common sense seems reasonable.
1396:. MOS:CT is not the end of the debate, it is one factor among many, and previous RMs have born out that WP:COMMONNAME has a say as well. A check of Google news shows
918:
300:
419:). How sources capitalize this title is irrelevant. Knowledge (XXG)'s style guide must be applied consequently to achieve and maintain internal consistency. See also
1544:
1649:
has mixed sources, upper and lowercasing "like", and it appears, without counting, that most or a large percentage are lowercased. Now look at the sources for
208:
2165:
198:
1667:
How is it apples and organs when we're literally talking about the same thing - prepositions. An encyclopaedic format and style is about consistency.
2160:
1027:
While I agree there was a RM previously which was against this, it was procedurally incorrect. The MOS is clearly set and even gives examples of
174:
689:
The comment below was originally made in the closed move request discussion. I have taken the liberty of placing it in its own subsection per
622:
follows the four-letter rule (i.e., virtually never news publisher will render it "Like" in every title of everything, no matter what). WP is
1096:
is certainly not the right way to overturn the outcome of an RM discussion, even if you think you are right and other people are wrong. —
1079:, "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page", so this should go to a full RM, even if we agree with the reasoning. -
809:
376:
901:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
637:'s title is a play on words, forming both a sentence and a subtitle simultaneously. Nothing like that is going on here. Next, YouTube is
275:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1403:, excluding titles. This is not a piece of running text, but rather a name, so deference should be given to the sources and the band.
87:
2155:
165:
126:
1509:
1441:
1349:
1243:
706:
675:
657:
grounds; but it's too stale for that now. Anyway, if anyone feels like re-RMing, feel free to crib any argument you like from this.
1155:
244:
1553:
also RfC participants then (an observation which is not to suggest that those individuals' involvement in that RfC confers any
799:
1557:
or authoritativeness to their interpretations of it), so I'm unsure why I'm the one to mention it while everyone else hasn't.
33:
2083:
Did anyone pushing this "per the five-letter rule" actually bother to read it, or do they just like wasting everyone's time?
1805:
See now we're entering the territory of original research. We're finding sources that display the song capitalising the L in
939:
420:
1912:, and the MOS specifically says "like" if as a preposition should not be capitalised, you've just broken your own argument?
78:
58:
2142:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
568:
549:
1163:
915:
sources commonly do so. Since capital "Like" doesn't seem to be in violation of the MOS, no move seems to be necessary.
892:
523:
266:
236:
2170:
1393:
2037:
when a significant majority of current, reliable sources that are independent of the subject consistently capitalize
449:* On YouTube, iTunes etc. all three letters are capitalized and should be the same with the title of the article. --
70:
52:
1199:- I do not think this song is about girls liking Adam Levine (maybe they should make a different one about that).--
750:
771:
Can you guys include the
Austria (Ö3 Austria Top 40) in the 2018 Year-End section? It's #13 and here's the ref:
833:
504:. OK this looks like a lost cause but the MOS is quite clear on this. We should either follow it or change it.
371:
2057:
but it is axiomatic that
English is inherently inconsistent - ie there are often near as many exceptions to a
902:
609:
533:
276:
39:
21:
1457:
the move are based on anything to do with maintaining our rules and styles for formal writing. Consensus has
2066:
1389:
1159:
649:
to declare that the guideline isn't a guidline. If I'd noticed this close sooner I would have taken this to
629:
391:
2054:
1901:
1225:
663:
1562:
454:
1870:
844:
829:
654:
605:
2117:
1989:
1929:
1834:
1754:
1684:
1627:
1506:
1479:
1438:
1346:
1265:
1240:
1127:
1101:
1084:
1057:
983:
864:
779:
701:
671:
173:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
86:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1948:
294:
288:. consensus appears to be that the title shouldn't be moved. While the MOS is indeed clear on this as
1708:
1658:
1525:
1371:
1325:
399:
338:, the "like" should have not be capitalised as it is a preposition with fewer than five letters. —
1951:
specifically provides that common names override consistency. This, in fact, confirms my argument.
1206:
1011:
905:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
724:
581:
357:
597:
2062:
1947:
No, it does not. You are reading the section on title consistency, not on common names. However,
1408:
1286:
934:
492:
471:
1335:
690:
646:
553:
415:
is used as a preposition here, so it should be lowercased as per
Knowledge (XXG)'s style guide (
1002:
That there was a previous RM at all indicates that this is not an uncontroversial request, per
2084:
1646:
1602:
1588:
1575:
1558:
1427:
1423:
1307:
509:
450:
436:
428:
343:
306:
1093:
642:
627:
consistency is a temporary illusion. Next, no rationale for the assertion that is similar to
601:
2105:
1977:
1961:
1917:
1883:
1822:
1795:
1742:
1672:
1615:
1501:
1467:
1433:
1359:
1341:
1261:
1235:
1115:
1097:
1080:
1045:
971:
852:
775:
696:
667:
157:
2096:
2040:
1554:
1076:
1033:
1003:
638:
623:
1704:
1654:
1521:
1426:" (which that band stylized in ALL-CAPS, another style we also did not parrot). See also "
1367:
1321:
557:
424:
395:
331:
650:
1650:
1598:
1545:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)/Archive_148#RFC_on_capitalization_of_prepositions
1430:" (by the very same band as the case under consideration here!), and many other cases.
1201:
1187:
1022:
1007:
949:
720:
572:
321:
240:
151:
141:
120:
1737:, even though that's how his name is often listed in charts, media and on cover arts.
2149:
1726:
1404:
1363:
1282:
959:
929:
613:
488:
467:
394:, where our general rules on not capitalizing 4-word prepositions should be ignored.
335:
289:
1772:
Can you point to an example of a title where the official name of the subject is an
1584:
1303:
966:
be capitalised. Many news sources will capitalise, wikipedia is not a news source.
505:
432:
339:
2053:) is consistent with the guidance and the evidence. An argument might be made to
2079:
1952:
1895:
1874:
1786:
1221:
1597:
Well that leads us to a ludacris situation where two songs by the same artist
619:
532:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
147:
772:
1183:
962:
is very clear and unequivocal that prepositions four-letters or less should
170:
653:
and also sought revocation of the page-mover bit, on policy-competence and
1814:
are guidance and policies. Its clear we are interpreting that differently
1302:. Having a style guide only makes sense when it is applied consistently.
169:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
2130:
2091:
2070:
2002:
1966:
1942:
1888:
1847:
1800:
1767:
1712:
1697:
1662:
1640:
1592:
1566:
1529:
1514:
1492:
1446:
1412:
1375:
1354:
1329:
1311:
1290:
1269:
1248:
1212:
1191:
1167:
1140:
1105:
1088:
1070:
1015:
996:
943:
877:
837:
817:
783:
728:
710:
590:
561:
513:
496:
475:
458:
440:
403:
382:
347:
314:
1578:. That pretty much seals the deal here, as it is clear that there are
2029:
2019:
1906:
The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles.
1299:
1257:
416:
2045:
1543:: Isn't this exactly the situation addressed by the adopted text at
633:
is provided, and it clearly isn't sensible. It's well-sourced that
334:, it's clear that this song is using meaning (2), and as such, per
828:
I’d rather say, that CARDI B bit ruined Maroon 5, change my mind…
552:". iTunes capitalizes "like," but it's grammatically incorrect.
1785:
styling, which is what we therefore end up using, as we should.
83:
2024:
485:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 21
1606:
formality of a encyclopedic content style. Otherwise we could
738:
224:
15:
1645:
Please look at the sources for both songs. You'll find that
1401:
of the first 20 hits using capital L "Like" in running text
466:- AFAIK, four letter prepositions should be capitalized. --
2061:
as there is conformity. Live with it or change the rule.
2078:. The vast majority of sources capitalize Like here and
954:
356:, most of the sources use the current capitalization. –
326:
235:
On 17 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be
1908:
Given that their previous release doesn't capitalise
958:– Despite of the vote count that took place in 2018,
522:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1182:
is used as a preposition (not a verb) in the title.
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
548:
I agree that "like" should be lowercase. Look at "
279:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1228:with innumerable prior cases. This is a standard "
1178:. I had a look at the lyrics, and it's clear that
536:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1810:presents the style of wikipedia. Pages beginning
1038:getting a consensus to apply the Manual of Style
719:- it's written like that on my smart tv. idk. --
1006:, and it will need a new RM consensus to move.
735:Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2018
1550:shorter) prepositions like "into" and "from".
8:
1417:Nope. It's well-sourced that the title of
19:
891:The following is a closed discussion of a
773:https://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2886107/
684:Additional comment (moved from discussion)
661:
265:The following is a closed discussion of a
115:
47:
1717:Then by your logic, if a topic was named
1277:per our guidelines and the evidence that
596:refuted in previous RMs. I.e., they are
1154:This is a contested technical request (
117:
49:
2036:
1909:
1905:
1811:
1806:
1782:
1773:
1734:
1730:
1722:
1718:
1607:
1548:
1028:
2100:quo) if not in favour of opposition.
183:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pop music
7:
2049:. The existing title (capitalising
2032:does give voice to an exception for
1320:obvious commonly uppercased titles.
1110:Thanks for moving the convo over :)
910:The result of the move request was:
411:. Indeed the lyrics make clear that
284:The result of the move request was:
163:This article is within the scope of
76:This article is within the scope of
2022:and evidence of use in sources per
1719:eNd Up wItH aRtIcLe NaMeS lIkE tHiS
1610:just because the media/RS says so.
1608:eNd Up wItH aRtIcLe NaMeS lIkE tHiS
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
2166:Mid-importance Pop music articles
96:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Songs
2138:The discussion above is closed.
1281:is used as a preposition here.
789:
742:
228:
150:
140:
119:
69:
51:
20:
203:This article has been rated as
2161:Start-Class Pop music articles
919:closed by non-admin page mover
421:A Girl like Me (Rihanna album)
390:. I think this is a case like
301:closed by non-admin page mover
186:Template:WikiProject Pop music
1:
1499:
1431:
1366:'s detailed reasoning below.
1339:
1233:
818:09:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
784:21:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
659:15:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
569:Someone like You (Adele song)
177:and see a list of open tasks.
90:and see a list of open tasks.
1036:, otherwise I'm effectively
729:04:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
711:07:57, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
591:21:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
1256:: We should follow our own
925:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
884:Requested move 17 July 2022
765:to reactivate your request.
753:has been answered. Set the
258:Requested move 12 June 2018
2187:
209:project's importance scale
99:Template:WikiProject Songs
2156:Start-Class song articles
2131:17:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2092:14:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2071:03:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2003:20:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1967:19:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1943:08:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1889:01:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1848:20:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1801:19:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1768:19:46, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1713:14:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1698:12:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1663:09:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1641:07:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1593:06:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1567:06:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1530:03:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1515:01:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1493:21:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1447:21:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1413:20:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1376:03:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1355:21:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1330:19:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1312:22:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1291:20:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1270:19:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1249:17:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1213:17:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1192:15:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1168:04:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1141:13:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1106:01:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1089:20:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
1071:19:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
1040:, which is non-sensical.
1016:19:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
997:19:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
944:05:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
878:19:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
838:18:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
624:not written in news style
562:18:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
514:19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
497:18:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
476:12:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
459:23:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
441:23:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
404:16:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
383:03:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
348:16:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
315:01:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
202:
135:
64:
46:
2140:Please do not modify it.
1580:almost no sources ad all
1232:as a preposition" case.
898:Please do not modify it.
529:Please do not modify it.
272:Please do not modify it.
1419:Star Trek Into Darkness
1390:Star Trek Into Darkness
630:Star Trek Into Darkness
392:Star Trek Into Darkness
1900:By your very quote of
1783:Article Name Like This
1774:aRtIcLe NaMe lIkE tHiS
1653:. apples And Oranges.
28:This article is rated
847:for fan discussions.
639:not a reliable source
166:WikiProject Pop music
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1260:style guidance. —
843:Knowledge (XXG) is
543:Followup discussion
2171:Pop music articles
1160:Extraordinary Writ
643:isn't an RS either
189:Pop music articles
34:content assessment
1647:Moves like Jagger
1603:Moves like Jagger
1576:User:Adumbrativus
1428:Moves like Jagger
1424:Do It like a Dude
1394:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
1170:
922:
807:
769:
768:
679:
666:comment added by
495:
429:Moves like Jagger
311:
304:
255:
254:
223:
222:
219:
218:
215:
214:
114:
113:
110:
109:
79:WikiProject Songs
2178:
2128:
2122:
2116:
2110:
2104:
2089:
2048:
2027:
2000:
1994:
1988:
1982:
1976:
1959:
1940:
1934:
1928:
1922:
1916:
1899:
1881:
1845:
1839:
1833:
1827:
1821:
1817:
1793:
1765:
1759:
1753:
1747:
1741:
1695:
1689:
1683:
1677:
1671:
1638:
1632:
1626:
1620:
1614:
1513:
1490:
1484:
1478:
1472:
1466:
1445:
1353:
1247:
1153:
1138:
1132:
1126:
1120:
1114:
1068:
1062:
1056:
1050:
1044:
1026:
994:
988:
982:
976:
970:
957:
916:
900:
875:
869:
863:
857:
851:
805:
793:
792:
760:
756:
746:
745:
739:
704:
699:
600:the system with
588:
579:
550:Someone like You
531:
491:
379:
374:
367:
364:
361:
329:
309:
298:
274:
243:. The result of
232:
231:
225:
191:
190:
187:
184:
181:
160:
158:Pop music portal
155:
154:
144:
137:
136:
131:
123:
116:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
2186:
2185:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2124:
2118:
2112:
2106:
2101:
2085:
2044:
2039:per the RfC at
2023:
1996:
1990:
1984:
1978:
1973:
1953:
1936:
1930:
1924:
1918:
1913:
1893:
1875:
1841:
1835:
1829:
1823:
1818:
1815:
1787:
1761:
1755:
1749:
1743:
1738:
1691:
1685:
1679:
1673:
1668:
1634:
1628:
1622:
1616:
1611:
1486:
1480:
1474:
1468:
1463:
1134:
1128:
1122:
1116:
1111:
1064:
1058:
1052:
1046:
1041:
1020:
990:
984:
978:
972:
967:
953:
896:
886:
871:
865:
859:
853:
848:
826:
824:Critics! Why???
790:
758:
754:
743:
737:
702:
697:
686:
641:; iTunes Store
582:
573:
545:
540:
527:
425:Someone like Me
377:
372:
365:
362:
359:
325:
312:
270:
260:
229:
188:
185:
182:
179:
178:
156:
149:
129:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2184:
2182:
2174:
2173:
2168:
2163:
2158:
2148:
2147:
2137:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2073:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1731:Ty Dolla $ ign
1651:Girls Like You
1599:Girls Like You
1569:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1532:
1449:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1314:
1293:
1272:
1251:
1215:
1194:
1172:
1171:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1091:
955:Girls like You
950:Girls Like You
947:
908:
907:
893:requested move
887:
885:
882:
881:
880:
830:TrollNaPaprice
825:
822:
821:
820:
767:
766:
747:
736:
733:
732:
731:
685:
682:
681:
680:
658:
610:WP:CONSISTENCY
593:
564:
544:
541:
539:
538:
524:requested move
518:
517:
516:
499:
478:
461:
444:
406:
385:
327:Girls like You
322:Girls Like You
320:
318:
308:
282:
281:
267:requested move
261:
259:
256:
253:
252:
245:the discussion
241:Girls like You
233:
221:
220:
217:
216:
213:
212:
205:Mid-importance
201:
195:
194:
192:
175:the discussion
162:
161:
145:
133:
132:
130:Mid‑importance
124:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
88:the discussion
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2183:
2172:
2169:
2167:
2164:
2162:
2159:
2157:
2154:
2153:
2151:
2141:
2132:
2127:
2123:
2121:
2115:
2111:
2109:
2098:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2081:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2063:Cinderella157
2060:
2056:
2055:WP:CONSISTENT
2052:
2047:
2042:
2038:
2035:
2031:
2026:
2021:
2017:
2014:
2013:
2004:
1999:
1995:
1993:
1987:
1983:
1981:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1965:
1964:
1960:
1958:
1957:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1939:
1935:
1933:
1927:
1923:
1921:
1911:
1907:
1904:it also says
1903:
1902:WP:COMMONNAME
1897:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1887:
1886:
1882:
1880:
1879:
1872:
1868:
1865:
1849:
1844:
1840:
1838:
1832:
1828:
1826:
1813:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1792:
1791:
1784:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1764:
1760:
1758:
1752:
1748:
1746:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1727:Ty Dolla Sign
1724:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1694:
1690:
1688:
1682:
1678:
1676:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1648:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1637:
1633:
1631:
1625:
1621:
1619:
1609:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1590:
1586:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1570:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1542:
1539:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1511:
1508:
1505:
1504:
1496:
1495:
1494:
1489:
1485:
1483:
1477:
1473:
1471:
1460:
1455:
1450:
1448:
1443:
1440:
1437:
1436:
1429:
1425:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1400:
1395:
1391:
1386:
1383:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1351:
1348:
1345:
1344:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1315:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1252:
1250:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1231:
1227:
1226:WP:CONSISTENT
1223:
1219:
1216:
1214:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1152:
1151:
1142:
1137:
1133:
1131:
1125:
1121:
1119:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1067:
1063:
1061:
1055:
1051:
1049:
1039:
1035:
1030:
1024:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
993:
989:
987:
981:
977:
975:
965:
961:
960:MOS:TITLECAPS
956:
951:
946:
945:
941:
937:
936:
932:
931:
926:
920:
913:
906:
904:
899:
894:
889:
888:
883:
879:
874:
870:
868:
862:
858:
856:
846:
842:
841:
840:
839:
835:
831:
823:
819:
816:
815:
814:
813:
808:
803:
802:
796:
788:
787:
786:
785:
781:
777:
774:
764:
761:parameter to
752:
748:
741:
740:
734:
730:
726:
722:
718:
715:
714:
713:
712:
709:
708:
705:
700:
694:
692:
683:
677:
673:
669:
665:
660:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
631:
625:
621:
615:
614:MOS:TITLECAPS
611:
607:
603:
599:
594:
592:
589:
587:
586:
580:
578:
577:
570:
565:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
542:
537:
535:
530:
525:
520:
519:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
375:
369:
368:
355:
352:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:MOS:TITLECAPS
333:
328:
323:
317:
316:
313:
302:
296:
291:
287:
280:
278:
273:
268:
263:
262:
257:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
227:
226:
210:
206:
200:
197:
196:
193:
176:
172:
168:
167:
159:
153:
148:
146:
143:
139:
138:
134:
128:
125:
122:
118:
106:
102:song articles
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
2139:
2125:
2119:
2113:
2107:
2086:
2075:
2058:
2050:
2046:Adumbrativus
2033:
2015:
1997:
1991:
1985:
1979:
1962:
1955:
1954:
1937:
1931:
1925:
1919:
1884:
1877:
1876:
1871:WP:COMMONAME
1866:
1842:
1836:
1830:
1824:
1796:
1789:
1788:
1777:
1776:, and where
1762:
1756:
1750:
1744:
1692:
1686:
1680:
1674:
1635:
1629:
1623:
1617:
1579:
1571:
1559:Adumbrativus
1540:
1502:
1487:
1481:
1475:
1469:
1458:
1453:
1434:
1418:
1398:
1384:
1342:
1316:
1295:
1278:
1274:
1253:
1236:
1229:
1224:, and to be
1217:
1207:
1202:
1200:
1196:
1179:
1176:Support move
1175:
1135:
1129:
1123:
1117:
1065:
1059:
1053:
1047:
1037:
991:
985:
979:
973:
963:
948:
933:
928:
924:
911:
909:
897:
890:
872:
866:
860:
854:
827:
811:
810:
804:
800:
798:
794:
770:
762:
751:edit request
716:
695:
688:
687:
662:— Preceding
655:WP:SUPERVOTE
634:
628:
617:
606:WP:FORUMSHOP
584:
583:
575:
574:
528:
521:
501:
480:
463:
451:Babar Suhail
446:
412:
408:
387:
358:
353:
319:
285:
283:
271:
264:
248:
204:
164:
77:
40:WikiProjects
2108:Lil-unique1
2080:MOS:5LETTER
1980:Lil-unique1
1949:WP:TITLECON
1920:Lil-unique1
1825:Lil-unique1
1745:Lil-unique1
1675:Lil-unique1
1618:Lil-unique1
1547:(2018–19)?
1503:SMcCandlish
1470:Lil-unique1
1435:SMcCandlish
1360:SMcCandlish
1343:SMcCandlish
1262:BarrelProof
1237:SMcCandlish
1222:MOS:5LETTER
1220:: Move per
1118:Lil-unique1
1098:BarrelProof
1081:Kj cheetham
1048:Lil-unique1
974:Lil-unique1
903:move review
855:Lil-unique1
845:not a forum
776:Cardicharts
668:SMcCandlish
612:as well as
534:move review
277:move review
30:Start-class
2150:Categories
2087:-- Vaulter
1705:Randy Kryn
1655:Randy Kryn
1522:Randy Kryn
1368:Randy Kryn
1322:Randy Kryn
912:not moved.
806:with them
755:|answered=
620:news style
396:Rreagan007
332:the lyrics
2043:noted by
1816:¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1555:ownership
1156:permalink
1023:DanCherek
1008:DanCherek
721:Ditobolli
598:WP:GAMING
286:Not moved
249:not moved
180:Pop music
171:pop music
127:Pop music
2025:SnowFire
1405:SnowFire
1364:SnowFire
1336:WP:VPPRO
1283:Dicklyon
812:hundreds
801:Flooded
691:WP:TALKO
676:contribs
664:unsigned
647:WP:VPPOL
571:exist.--
489:Dekimasu
468:Jax 0677
290:Dekimasu
1778:sources
1585:Amakuru
1583:RM. —
1541:Comment
1304:Darkday
1296:Support
1275:Support
1254:Support
1218:Support
1197:Support
1094:WP:RMTR
1075:As per
717:Oppose
602:WP:IDHT
506:Andrewa
502:Support
481:Comment
464:Oppose
433:Darkday
409:Support
360:Laundry
340:Amakuru
307:Cameron
207:on the
2097:WP:AGF
2076:Oppose
2041:WP:VPP
2030:MOS:CT
2020:MOS:CT
2016:Oppose
1956:BD2412
1896:BD2412
1878:BD2412
1867:Oppose
1790:BD2412
1572:Oppose
1385:Oppose
1317:Oppose
1300:MOS:CT
1258:MOS:CT
1077:WP:PCM
1034:WP:IAR
1004:WP:PCM
447:Oppose
417:MOS:CT
388:Oppose
354:Oppose
295:WT:MOS
36:scale.
2103:: -->
2102:: -->
1975:: -->
1974:: -->
1915:: -->
1914:: -->
1820:: -->
1819:: -->
1740:: -->
1739:: -->
1670:: -->
1669:: -->
1613:: -->
1612:: -->
1465:: -->
1464:: -->
1459:never
1113:: -->
1112:: -->
1043:: -->
1042:: -->
969:: -->
968:: -->
930:mello
850:: -->
849:: -->
759:|ans=
749:This
651:WP:MR
554:RKJ 5
363:Pizza
310:11598
237:moved
93:Songs
84:songs
59:Songs
2120:talk
2067:talk
2059:rule
2051:Like
2034:like
2018:Per
1992:talk
1932:talk
1910:like
1869:per
1837:talk
1807:like
1757:talk
1735:Ty$
1723:like
1709:talk
1687:talk
1659:talk
1630:talk
1601:and
1589:talk
1574:per
1563:talk
1526:talk
1482:talk
1409:talk
1399:100%
1372:talk
1326:talk
1308:talk
1298:per
1287:talk
1279:like
1266:talk
1230:like
1188:talk
1184:Deor
1180:like
1164:talk
1130:talk
1102:talk
1085:talk
1060:talk
1029:like
1012:talk
986:talk
867:talk
834:talk
795:Done
780:talk
725:talk
698:Life
672:talk
635:STID
604:and
558:talk
510:talk
472:talk
455:talk
437:talk
413:like
400:talk
344:talk
247:was
2028:.
1812:WP:
1733:or
1729:as
1512:😼
1454:not
1444:😼
1352:😼
1246:😼
1158:).
964:not
935:hi!
797:--
757:or
707:Tau
526:.
423:,
297:.
239:to
199:Mid
2152::
2129:—
2069:)
2001:—
1941:—
1873:.
1846:—
1766:—
1711:)
1696:—
1661:)
1639:—
1591:)
1565:)
1528:)
1500:—
1491:—
1432:—
1411:)
1374:)
1340:—
1338:.
1328:)
1310:)
1289:)
1268:)
1234:—
1190:)
1166:)
1139:—
1104:)
1087:)
1069:—
1014:)
995:—
952:→
942:)
940:投稿
927:,
923:—
895:.
876:—
836:)
782:)
763:no
727:)
703:of
678:)
674:•
560:)
512:)
493:よ!
474:)
457:)
439:)
431:.
427:,
402:)
381:)
378:c̄
366:03
346:)
324:→
305:--
269:.
2126:)
2114:(
2065:(
1998:)
1986:(
1963:T
1938:)
1926:(
1898::
1894:@
1885:T
1843:)
1831:(
1797:T
1763:)
1751:(
1707:(
1693:)
1681:(
1657:(
1636:)
1624:(
1587:(
1561:(
1524:(
1510:¢
1507:☏
1488:)
1476:(
1442:¢
1439:☏
1422:"
1407:(
1370:(
1350:¢
1347:☏
1324:(
1306:(
1285:(
1264:(
1244:¢
1241:☏
1208:Ø
1203:N
1186:(
1162:(
1136:)
1124:(
1100:(
1083:(
1066:)
1054:(
1025::
1021:@
1010:(
992:)
980:(
938:(
921:)
917:(
873:)
861:(
832:(
778:(
723:(
693:.
670:(
616:.
585:Ø
576:N
556:(
508:(
470:(
453:(
443:*
435:(
398:(
373:d
370:(
342:(
303:)
299:(
251:.
211:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
