82:
64:
1732:, and covered by reliable sources we should abandon all sense, logic and formality and simply go with what sources say? That's not what Knowledge (XXG) is nor is it encyclopaedic, professional or formal. We have the MOS for consistency. Local consensus should not outweight MOS otherwise anyone can get together any band of mates and strong arm a project or topic into accepting a style or point of view not represented anywhere else. The MOS is also designed to prevent this daft situation we're now in where there's two works, both containing the word
241:
132:
1509:
completely different from a COMMONNAME question, like whether the article should be titled "Girls like You" or "Some Girls like You" because both conflicting titles were on different releases of the same song (to make up an example). COMMONNAME has nothing to do with style questions, or MoS simply would not exist (or at least would never apply to title questions; but of course we apply it dozens of times per day to title questions).
163:
1345:"so as not to include myself in Knowledge (XXG)'s ridiculousness" – The closer should be clear that Randy Kryn is making an argument against the guideline existing, not against the guideline applying in this case. The editor is well aware that if he wants to change the guideline, e.g. to capitalize prepositions of four letters or more instead of five, that the place to propose that is the guideline talk page or
33:
755:
1373:, no, I'm fine with the guideline, and it seems to work well in most cases. Yet every guideline begins with the statement about common sense exceptions, and I've always contended that this guideline introduction language actually dictates that some common sense exceptions should exist. This is one. Uppercase should prevail, per no sources existing which lowercase the name of the song, and
802:
656:. Then the final opposer says they don't actually know what the rules are. So, FAIL. The close is flat-out wrong. You cannot declare that a site-wide guideline doesn't have consensus on the basis of four people making invalid arguments that don't even address whether it has consensus. It would take a massive RfC at
1408:
341:– There are two possible meanings of the phrase "girls like you" - (1) "like" is a verb, and it is someone telling another person that girls like them; and (2) "like" is a preposition, and is the phrase is part of a larger sentence in which someone tells a girl what girls like her are prone to do. Looking at
606:
Yes, this should be re-RMed, since it directly conflicts with every other "like as a preposition" case. This is something we've been over many, many times at RM, and with a consistent lower-case result. What I note above is that various editors have showed up to recycle the same arguments that were
2110:
folks... AGF! I started the discussion on the basis of trying to maintain some sense of consistency with their prior release "Moves like Jagger" but clearly people feel strongly about it and more sources than not capitalise it, so it looks like it will close as a pretty-evenly split (maintain status
2093:
explicitly says to "Apply our five-letter rule (above) for prepositions except when a significant majority of current, reliable sources that are independent of the subject consistently capitalize, in the title of a specific work, a word that is frequently not a preposition, as in 'Like' and 'Past'."
1560:
Apply our five-letter rule except when a significant majority of current, reliable sources that are independent of the subject consistently capitalize, in the title of a specific work, a word that is frequently not a preposition, as in "Like" and "Past". Continue to lower-case common four-letter (or
637:
as a matter of policy. Most book publishers use a five-letter rule (as does WP), and academic ones use a never-capitalize-any-prepositions rule, so by the time this gets mentioned in books and in music or popular culture journals, they render it "like" in this song's title. The appearance of source
1593:
which lowercase the "like". The MOS has always been a useful guideline for the majority of cases, but it is also clear that it shouldn't make up styling not found in reliable sources, and the proposition plus the support votes here haven't addressed this point at all, which was the crux of the last
1563:
That is, if there is such a majority (an empirical matter which can be debated; so far, one participant offers evidence arguing that it is true, and none argues it is false), then "Like" should be capitalized even though it is being used as a preposition. Of course, several RM participants now were
1508:
Yes, the obvious fault in this "populist" reasoning is that most of the sources for something like this are entertainment news publications, 99% of which follow a four-letter-rule style guide. It doesn't mean anything other than that there are different style guides (and we have our own). This is
1467:
be capitalised. The word like is given as an example. In this context Like is used as a preposition rather than a verb. We can't have local consensuses that are not based on our policies guidance or Manual of Style. The previous RM was procedurally incorrect. None of the reasons given for opposing
1042:
not being capitalised. I'm not sure we need a consensus to apply the MOS. At the moment, the existing situation means a local consensus based on opinion with no procedural or factual backing overrules the MOS, meaning that the target article is the exception to the rule for no reason other than a
1330:
per sources overwhelmingly uppercasing (has anyone lowercased?), this being listed as a major all-time song, per the 2018 RM and its finely written close, and I have to at least register an 'oppose' when I saw this RM so as not to include myself in
Knowledge (XXG)'s ridiculousness in lowercasing
1820:
to demonstrate this is the common title. I don't believe that is how common title was intended to be portrayed or used. The decision is to capitalise L is a stylistic choice - that's the very point I am trying to make. IMO (and my experience of editing for years now), the MOS is unequivocal and
925:
There seems to be a consensus to follow the MOS here from both sides. Originally, the RM was made under the assumption that capital "Like" violated the MOS, but that was refuted by further examination of the MOS to discover an exception where "Like" is permitted to be capitalized if independent
1530:
All well and good, but do you have a reputable source that lowercases? Knowledge (XXG) is supposed to be source based, but the five-letter rule often ignores that. Ignoring one rule in favor of another usually works well when
Knowledge (XXG)-tradition extends into overturning the abundance of
1616:
use the same preposition in the same way one is capitalised, the other isn't. If we go by that logic, then if an artist releases a song styled all in capitals or all in lowercase and all RS refer to it in that way then we should ignore the MOS. The whole point of MOS is to ensure clarity and
153:
1472:
been obtained by counting votes. Someone saying "opposed" based on their personal opinion or preference is worthless versus a "support" vote based on clear rule, guidance, procedure or MOS. We're not a news article or news source, who quite often stray from capitalisation rules.
1713:
lol (which I only write if I'm lol) at "apples and organs". When no outside
Knowledge (XXG) examples exist for a certain named song then where is the expected encyclopedic accuracy? If the sources were mixed, such as in "Moves like Jagger", I wouldn't have posted on this RM.
494:. The MOS is clear on this point, and most of the opposes here don't have much grounding, but it hasn't been clear for years whether the MOS really represents community consensus on this word in particular. For example, there's the extensive evidence of
498:. I'm not sure it's worth changing one of these without discussing the hundreds of other capitalized instances of "Like" in article titles, and I'm pretty sure discussing the hundreds together wouldn't lead to a consensus to change the titles either.
1982:
Commoname applies to the words and title of the page, it does not preclude or override MOS. Common name is a guidance piece/policy, TITLECAPS is a a part of MOS. One is about content, the other is about how said content is displayed and presented.
1398:
per Randy Kryn, the previous RM, and the OVERWHELMING majority of sources. The band is allowed to title their song however they like and not be second-guessed, and they clearly capitalize "Like", and this is not a stylization. See the famous
1462:
Poor rational tbh - just because media and news outlets use a certain type of capitalisation doesn't mean we follow suit. Knowledge (XXG) is encyclopaedic and formal in tone. Our style manual says prepositions 4 letters or under should
303:
points out it isn't clear if it has community consensus. Their point that if the issue as a whole was brought to the community that there would likely be no consensus is well taken. Perhaps this is a discussion to have at
1791:
have in fact used the title that way, causing it to be used as the title in
Knowledge (XXG)? I think the entire point of the policy is that sources overwhelmingly tend to ignore such stying and identify such things with
1043:
group of editors voted it should. This is an affront to the encyclopaedic format of
Knowledge (XXG) when other articles with similar prepositions have to follow this rule. It seems like an obvious case of
1736:, both using the word as a preposition in the same way but both using different stylisations (one caps, one not). That's what it is at the end of the day, stylisation. Its the same reason we don't display
1432:
is a play on words, forming both a sentence and a subtitle simultaneously; this is the reason why it remains "Into" on WP. Nothing like that is going on here. What we have here is exactly the same case as
577:
I would also agree that the 'like' should be lowercase. I'm shocked by the overwhelming consensus for the opposite in the above discussion when the MoS is very clear about this and clear-cut examples like
495:
619:: just keep recycling the same consensus-rejected idea over and over again until you get lucky and a random closer who isn't looking very closely buys into it. Anyway, next time lead with
1403:
debate where the "strictly lowercase any 4 letter preposition no matter what the sources say" lost out in a well-attended, high consensus case, which should not be lightly set aside to a
629:
Going over this, all of the rationales are invalid. How many sources are using "Like" is irrelevant in a four-letter preposition case when 99.9% of them are news, since
1531:
sources, but in this case, as in several others, if not one reputable source can be found lowercasing the word in question then applying common sense seems reasonable.
1407:. MOS:CT is not the end of the debate, it is one factor among many, and previous RMs have born out that WP:COMMONNAME has a say as well. A check of Google news shows
929:
311:
430:). How sources capitalize this title is irrelevant. Knowledge (XXG)'s style guide must be applied consequently to achieve and maintain internal consistency. See also
1555:
1660:
has mixed sources, upper and lowercasing "like", and it appears, without counting, that most or a large percentage are lowercased. Now look at the sources for
219:
2176:
209:
1678:
How is it apples and organs when we're literally talking about the same thing - prepositions. An encyclopaedic format and style is about consistency.
2171:
1038:
While I agree there was a RM previously which was against this, it was procedurally incorrect. The MOS is clearly set and even gives examples of
185:
700:
The comment below was originally made in the closed move request discussion. I have taken the liberty of placing it in its own subsection per
633:
follows the four-letter rule (i.e., virtually never news publisher will render it "Like" in every title of everything, no matter what). WP is
1107:
is certainly not the right way to overturn the outcome of an RM discussion, even if you think you are right and other people are wrong. —
1090:, "there has been any past debate about the best title for the page", so this should go to a full RM, even if we agree with the reasoning. -
820:
387:
912:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
648:'s title is a play on words, forming both a sentence and a subtitle simultaneously. Nothing like that is going on here. Next, YouTube is
286:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1414:, excluding titles. This is not a piece of running text, but rather a name, so deference should be given to the sources and the band.
98:
2166:
176:
137:
1520:
1452:
1360:
1254:
717:
686:
668:
grounds; but it's too stale for that now. Anyway, if anyone feels like re-RMing, feel free to crib any argument you like from this.
1166:
255:
1564:
also RfC participants then (an observation which is not to suggest that those individuals' involvement in that RfC confers any
810:
1568:
or authoritativeness to their interpretations of it), so I'm unsure why I'm the one to mention it while everyone else hasn't.
44:
2094:
Did anyone pushing this "per the five-letter rule" actually bother to read it, or do they just like wasting everyone's time?
1816:
See now we're entering the territory of original research. We're finding sources that display the song capitalising the L in
950:
431:
1923:, and the MOS specifically says "like" if as a preposition should not be capitalised, you've just broken your own argument?
89:
69:
2153:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
579:
560:
1174:
926:
sources commonly do so. Since capital "Like" doesn't seem to be in violation of the MOS, no move seems to be necessary.
903:
534:
277:
247:
2181:
1404:
2048:
when a significant majority of current, reliable sources that are independent of the subject consistently capitalize
460:* On YouTube, iTunes etc. all three letters are capitalized and should be the same with the title of the article. --
81:
63:
1210:- I do not think this song is about girls liking Adam Levine (maybe they should make a different one about that).--
761:
782:
Can you guys include the
Austria (Ö3 Austria Top 40) in the 2018 Year-End section? It's #13 and here's the ref:
844:
515:. OK this looks like a lost cause but the MOS is quite clear on this. We should either follow it or change it.
382:
2068:
but it is axiomatic that
English is inherently inconsistent - ie there are often near as many exceptions to a
913:
620:
544:
287:
50:
32:
1468:
the move are based on anything to do with maintaining our rules and styles for formal writing. Consensus has
2077:
1400:
1170:
660:
to declare that the guideline isn't a guidline. If I'd noticed this close sooner I would have taken this to
640:
402:
2065:
1912:
1236:
674:
1573:
465:
1881:
855:
840:
665:
616:
2128:
2000:
1940:
1845:
1765:
1695:
1638:
1517:
1490:
1449:
1357:
1276:
1251:
1138:
1112:
1095:
1068:
994:
875:
790:
712:
682:
184:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
97:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1959:
305:
299:. consensus appears to be that the title shouldn't be moved. While the MOS is indeed clear on this as
1719:
1669:
1536:
1382:
1336:
410:
349:, the "like" should have not be capitalised as it is a preposition with fewer than five letters. —
1962:
specifically provides that common names override consistency. This, in fact, confirms my argument.
1217:
1022:
916:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
735:
592:
368:
17:
608:
2073:
1958:
No, it does not. You are reading the section on title consistency, not on common names. However,
1419:
1297:
945:
503:
482:
1346:
701:
657:
564:
426:
is used as a preposition here, so it should be lowercased as per
Knowledge (XXG)'s style guide (
1013:
That there was a previous RM at all indicates that this is not an uncontroversial request, per
2095:
1657:
1613:
1599:
1586:
1569:
1438:
1434:
1318:
520:
461:
447:
439:
354:
317:
1104:
653:
638:
consistency is a temporary illusion. Next, no rationale for the assertion that is similar to
612:
2116:
1988:
1972:
1928:
1894:
1833:
1806:
1753:
1683:
1626:
1512:
1478:
1444:
1370:
1352:
1272:
1246:
1126:
1108:
1091:
1056:
982:
863:
786:
707:
678:
168:
2107:
2051:
1565:
1087:
1044:
1014:
649:
634:
1715:
1665:
1532:
1437:" (which that band stylized in ALL-CAPS, another style we also did not parrot). See also "
1378:
1332:
568:
435:
406:
342:
661:
1661:
1609:
1556:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)/Archive_148#RFC_on_capitalization_of_prepositions
1441:" (by the very same band as the case under consideration here!), and many other cases.
1212:
1198:
1033:
1018:
960:
731:
583:
332:
251:
162:
152:
131:
1748:, even though that's how his name is often listed in charts, media and on cover arts.
2160:
1737:
1415:
1374:
1293:
970:
940:
624:
499:
478:
405:, where our general rules on not capitalizing 4-word prepositions should be ignored.
346:
300:
1783:
Can you point to an example of a title where the official name of the subject is an
1595:
1314:
977:
be capitalised. Many news sources will capitalise, wikipedia is not a news source.
516:
443:
350:
2064:) is consistent with the guidance and the evidence. An argument might be made to
2090:
1963:
1906:
1885:
1797:
1232:
1608:
Well that leads us to a ludacris situation where two songs by the same artist
630:
543:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
158:
783:
1194:
973:
is very clear and unequivocal that prepositions four-letters or less should
181:
664:
and also sought revocation of the page-mover bit, on policy-competence and
1825:
are guidance and policies. Its clear we are interpreting that differently
1313:. Having a style guide only makes sense when it is applied consistently.
180:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
2141:
2102:
2081:
2013:
1977:
1953:
1899:
1858:
1811:
1778:
1723:
1708:
1673:
1651:
1603:
1577:
1540:
1525:
1503:
1457:
1423:
1386:
1365:
1340:
1322:
1301:
1280:
1259:
1223:
1202:
1178:
1151:
1116:
1099:
1081:
1026:
1007:
954:
888:
848:
828:
794:
739:
721:
601:
572:
524:
507:
486:
469:
451:
414:
393:
358:
325:
1589:. That pretty much seals the deal here, as it is clear that there are
2040:
2030:
1917:
The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles.
1310:
1268:
427:
2056:
1554:: Isn't this exactly the situation addressed by the adopted text at
644:
is provided, and it clearly isn't sensible. It's well-sourced that
345:, it's clear that this song is using meaning (2), and as such, per
839:
I’d rather say, that CARDI B bit ruined Maroon 5, change my mind…
563:". iTunes capitalizes "like," but it's grammatically incorrect.
1796:
styling, which is what we therefore end up using, as we should.
94:
2035:
496:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters/Archive 21
1617:
formality of a encyclopedic content style. Otherwise we could
749:
235:
26:
1656:
Please look at the sources for both songs. You'll find that
1412:
of the first 20 hits using capital L "Like" in running text
477:- AFAIK, four letter prepositions should be capitalized. --
2072:
as there is conformity. Live with it or change the rule.
2089:. The vast majority of sources capitalize Like here and
965:
367:, most of the sources use the current capitalization. –
337:
246:
On 17 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be
1919:
Given that their previous release doesn't capitalise
969:– Despite of the vote count that took place in 2018,
533:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
1193:
is used as a preposition (not a verb) in the title.
93:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
559:
I agree that "like" should be lowercase. Look at "
290:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1239:with innumerable prior cases. This is a standard "
1189:. I had a look at the lyrics, and it's clear that
547:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1821:presents the style of wikipedia. Pages beginning
1049:getting a consensus to apply the Manual of Style
730:- it's written like that on my smart tv. idk. --
1017:, and it will need a new RM consensus to move.
746:Semi-protected edit request on 27 December 2018
1561:shorter) prepositions like "into" and "from".
8:
1428:Nope. It's well-sourced that the title of
30:
902:The following is a closed discussion of a
784:https://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2886107/
695:Additional comment (moved from discussion)
672:
276:The following is a closed discussion of a
126:
58:
1728:Then by your logic, if a topic was named
1288:per our guidelines and the evidence that
607:refuted in previous RMs. I.e., they are
1165:This is a contested technical request (
128:
60:
2047:
1920:
1916:
1822:
1817:
1793:
1784:
1745:
1741:
1733:
1729:
1618:
1559:
1039:
2111:quo) if not in favour of opposition.
194:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Pop music
7:
2060:. The existing title (capitalising
2043:does give voice to an exception for
1331:obvious commonly uppercased titles.
1121:Thanks for moving the convo over :)
921:The result of the move request was:
422:. Indeed the lyrics make clear that
295:The result of the move request was:
174:This article is within the scope of
87:This article is within the scope of
2033:and evidence of use in sources per
1730:eNd Up wItH aRtIcLe NaMeS lIkE tHiS
1621:just because the media/RS says so.
1619:eNd Up wItH aRtIcLe NaMeS lIkE tHiS
49:It is of interest to the following
18:Talk:Girls Like You (Maroon 5 song)
25:
2177:Mid-importance Pop music articles
107:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Songs
2149:The discussion above is closed.
1292:is used as a preposition here.
800:
753:
239:
161:
151:
130:
80:
62:
31:
214:This article has been rated as
2172:Start-Class Pop music articles
930:closed by non-admin page mover
432:A Girl like Me (Rihanna album)
401:. I think this is a case like
312:closed by non-admin page mover
197:Template:WikiProject Pop music
1:
1510:
1442:
1377:'s detailed reasoning below.
1350:
1244:
829:09:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
795:21:41, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
670:15:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
580:Someone like You (Adele song)
188:and see a list of open tasks.
101:and see a list of open tasks.
1047:, otherwise I'm effectively
740:04:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
722:07:57, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
602:21:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
1267:: We should follow our own
936:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
895:Requested move 17 July 2022
776:to reactivate your request.
764:has been answered. Set the
269:Requested move 12 June 2018
2198:
220:project's importance scale
110:Template:WikiProject Songs
2167:Start-Class song articles
2142:17:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2103:14:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2082:03:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
2014:20:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1978:19:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1954:08:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1900:01:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1859:20:48, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1812:19:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
1779:19:46, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1724:14:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1709:12:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1674:09:39, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1652:07:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1604:06:26, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1578:06:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1541:03:50, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1526:01:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1504:21:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1458:21:24, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1424:20:56, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1387:03:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
1366:21:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1341:19:32, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
1323:22:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1302:20:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1281:19:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1260:17:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1224:17:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1203:15:46, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1179:04:56, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1152:13:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1117:01:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
1100:20:33, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
1082:19:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
1051:, which is non-sensical.
1027:19:20, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
1008:19:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
955:05:42, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
889:19:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
849:18:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
635:not written in news style
573:18:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
525:19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
508:18:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
487:12:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
470:23:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
452:23:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
415:16:22, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
394:03:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
359:16:15, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
326:01:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
213:
146:
75:
57:
2151:Please do not modify it.
1591:almost no sources ad all
1243:as a preposition" case.
909:Please do not modify it.
540:Please do not modify it.
283:Please do not modify it.
1430:Star Trek Into Darkness
1401:Star Trek Into Darkness
641:Star Trek Into Darkness
403:Star Trek Into Darkness
1911:By your very quote of
1794:Article Name Like This
1785:aRtIcLe NaMe lIkE tHiS
1664:. apples And Oranges.
39:This article is rated
858:for fan discussions.
650:not a reliable source
177:WikiProject Pop music
43:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1271:style guidance. —
854:Knowledge (XXG) is
554:Followup discussion
2182:Pop music articles
1171:Extraordinary Writ
654:isn't an RS either
200:Pop music articles
45:content assessment
1658:Moves like Jagger
1614:Moves like Jagger
1587:User:Adumbrativus
1439:Moves like Jagger
1435:Do It like a Dude
1405:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS
1181:
933:
818:
780:
779:
690:
677:comment added by
506:
440:Moves like Jagger
322:
315:
266:
265:
234:
233:
230:
229:
226:
225:
125:
124:
121:
120:
90:WikiProject Songs
16:(Redirected from
2189:
2139:
2133:
2127:
2121:
2115:
2100:
2059:
2038:
2011:
2005:
1999:
1993:
1987:
1970:
1951:
1945:
1939:
1933:
1927:
1910:
1892:
1856:
1850:
1844:
1838:
1832:
1828:
1804:
1776:
1770:
1764:
1758:
1752:
1706:
1700:
1694:
1688:
1682:
1649:
1643:
1637:
1631:
1625:
1524:
1501:
1495:
1489:
1483:
1477:
1456:
1364:
1258:
1164:
1149:
1143:
1137:
1131:
1125:
1079:
1073:
1067:
1061:
1055:
1037:
1005:
999:
993:
987:
981:
968:
927:
911:
886:
880:
874:
868:
862:
816:
804:
803:
771:
767:
757:
756:
750:
715:
710:
611:the system with
599:
590:
561:Someone like You
542:
502:
390:
385:
378:
375:
372:
340:
320:
309:
285:
254:. The result of
243:
242:
236:
202:
201:
198:
195:
192:
171:
169:Pop music portal
166:
165:
155:
148:
147:
142:
134:
127:
115:
114:
111:
108:
105:
84:
77:
76:
66:
59:
42:
36:
35:
27:
21:
2197:
2196:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2157:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2135:
2129:
2123:
2117:
2112:
2096:
2055:
2050:per the RfC at
2034:
2007:
2001:
1995:
1989:
1984:
1964:
1947:
1941:
1935:
1929:
1924:
1904:
1886:
1852:
1846:
1840:
1834:
1829:
1826:
1798:
1772:
1766:
1760:
1754:
1749:
1702:
1696:
1690:
1684:
1679:
1645:
1639:
1633:
1627:
1622:
1497:
1491:
1485:
1479:
1474:
1145:
1139:
1133:
1127:
1122:
1075:
1069:
1063:
1057:
1052:
1031:
1001:
995:
989:
983:
978:
964:
907:
897:
882:
876:
870:
864:
859:
837:
835:Critics! Why???
801:
769:
765:
754:
748:
713:
708:
697:
652:; iTunes Store
593:
584:
556:
551:
538:
436:Someone like Me
388:
383:
376:
373:
370:
336:
323:
281:
271:
240:
199:
196:
193:
190:
189:
167:
160:
140:
112:
109:
106:
103:
102:
40:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2195:
2193:
2185:
2184:
2179:
2174:
2169:
2159:
2158:
2148:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2084:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1742:Ty Dolla $ ign
1662:Girls Like You
1610:Girls Like You
1580:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1460:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1325:
1304:
1283:
1262:
1226:
1205:
1183:
1182:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1102:
966:Girls like You
961:Girls Like You
958:
919:
918:
904:requested move
898:
896:
893:
892:
891:
841:TrollNaPaprice
836:
833:
832:
831:
778:
777:
758:
747:
744:
743:
742:
696:
693:
692:
691:
669:
621:WP:CONSISTENCY
604:
575:
555:
552:
550:
549:
535:requested move
529:
528:
527:
510:
489:
472:
455:
417:
396:
338:Girls like You
333:Girls Like You
331:
329:
319:
293:
292:
278:requested move
272:
270:
267:
264:
263:
256:the discussion
252:Girls like You
244:
232:
231:
228:
227:
224:
223:
216:Mid-importance
212:
206:
205:
203:
186:the discussion
173:
172:
156:
144:
143:
141:Mid‑importance
135:
123:
122:
119:
118:
116:
99:the discussion
85:
73:
72:
67:
55:
54:
48:
37:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2194:
2183:
2180:
2178:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2168:
2165:
2164:
2162:
2152:
2143:
2138:
2134:
2132:
2126:
2122:
2120:
2109:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2101:
2099:
2092:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2079:
2075:
2074:Cinderella157
2071:
2067:
2066:WP:CONSISTENT
2063:
2058:
2053:
2049:
2046:
2042:
2037:
2032:
2028:
2025:
2024:
2015:
2010:
2006:
2004:
1998:
1994:
1992:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1969:
1968:
1961:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1950:
1946:
1944:
1938:
1934:
1932:
1922:
1918:
1915:it also says
1914:
1913:WP:COMMONNAME
1908:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1898:
1897:
1893:
1891:
1890:
1883:
1879:
1876:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1849:
1843:
1839:
1837:
1824:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1803:
1802:
1795:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1781:
1780:
1775:
1771:
1769:
1763:
1759:
1757:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1738:Ty Dolla Sign
1735:
1731:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1705:
1701:
1699:
1693:
1689:
1687:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1648:
1644:
1642:
1636:
1632:
1630:
1620:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1562:
1557:
1553:
1550:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1522:
1519:
1516:
1515:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1500:
1496:
1494:
1488:
1484:
1482:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1459:
1454:
1451:
1448:
1447:
1440:
1436:
1431:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1397:
1394:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1348:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1256:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1242:
1238:
1237:WP:CONSISTENT
1234:
1230:
1227:
1225:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1209:
1206:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1163:
1162:
1153:
1148:
1144:
1142:
1136:
1132:
1130:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1072:
1066:
1062:
1060:
1050:
1046:
1041:
1035:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1004:
1000:
998:
992:
988:
986:
976:
972:
971:MOS:TITLECAPS
967:
962:
957:
956:
952:
948:
947:
943:
942:
937:
931:
924:
917:
915:
910:
905:
900:
899:
894:
890:
885:
881:
879:
873:
869:
867:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
846:
842:
834:
830:
827:
826:
825:
824:
819:
814:
813:
807:
799:
798:
797:
796:
792:
788:
785:
775:
772:parameter to
763:
759:
752:
751:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
726:
725:
724:
723:
720:
719:
716:
711:
705:
703:
694:
688:
684:
680:
676:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
636:
632:
626:
625:MOS:TITLECAPS
622:
618:
614:
610:
605:
603:
600:
598:
597:
591:
589:
588:
581:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:
553:
548:
546:
541:
536:
531:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
488:
484:
480:
476:
473:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
395:
391:
386:
380:
379:
366:
363:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:MOS:TITLECAPS
344:
339:
334:
328:
327:
324:
313:
307:
302:
298:
291:
289:
284:
279:
274:
273:
268:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
238:
237:
221:
217:
211:
208:
207:
204:
187:
183:
179:
178:
170:
164:
159:
157:
154:
150:
149:
145:
139:
136:
133:
129:
117:
113:song articles
100:
96:
92:
91:
86:
83:
79:
78:
74:
71:
68:
65:
61:
56:
52:
46:
38:
34:
29:
28:
19:
2150:
2136:
2130:
2124:
2118:
2097:
2086:
2069:
2061:
2057:Adumbrativus
2044:
2026:
2008:
2002:
1996:
1990:
1973:
1966:
1965:
1948:
1942:
1936:
1930:
1895:
1888:
1887:
1882:WP:COMMONAME
1877:
1853:
1847:
1841:
1835:
1807:
1800:
1799:
1788:
1787:, and where
1773:
1767:
1761:
1755:
1703:
1697:
1691:
1685:
1646:
1640:
1634:
1628:
1590:
1582:
1570:Adumbrativus
1551:
1513:
1498:
1492:
1486:
1480:
1469:
1464:
1445:
1429:
1409:
1395:
1353:
1327:
1306:
1289:
1285:
1264:
1247:
1240:
1235:, and to be
1228:
1218:
1213:
1211:
1207:
1190:
1187:Support move
1186:
1146:
1140:
1134:
1128:
1076:
1070:
1064:
1058:
1048:
1002:
996:
990:
984:
974:
959:
944:
939:
935:
922:
920:
908:
901:
883:
877:
871:
865:
838:
822:
821:
815:
811:
809:
805:
781:
773:
762:edit request
727:
706:
699:
698:
673:— Preceding
666:WP:SUPERVOTE
645:
639:
628:
617:WP:FORUMSHOP
595:
594:
586:
585:
539:
532:
512:
491:
474:
462:Babar Suhail
457:
423:
419:
398:
369:
364:
330:
296:
294:
282:
275:
259:
215:
175:
88:
51:WikiProjects
2119:Lil-unique1
2091:MOS:5LETTER
1991:Lil-unique1
1960:WP:TITLECON
1931:Lil-unique1
1836:Lil-unique1
1756:Lil-unique1
1686:Lil-unique1
1629:Lil-unique1
1558:(2018–19)?
1514:SMcCandlish
1481:Lil-unique1
1446:SMcCandlish
1371:SMcCandlish
1354:SMcCandlish
1273:BarrelProof
1248:SMcCandlish
1233:MOS:5LETTER
1231:: Move per
1129:Lil-unique1
1109:BarrelProof
1092:Kj cheetham
1059:Lil-unique1
985:Lil-unique1
914:move review
866:Lil-unique1
856:not a forum
787:Cardicharts
679:SMcCandlish
623:as well as
545:move review
288:move review
41:Start-class
2161:Categories
2098:-- Vaulter
1716:Randy Kryn
1666:Randy Kryn
1533:Randy Kryn
1379:Randy Kryn
1333:Randy Kryn
923:not moved.
817:with them
766:|answered=
631:news style
407:Rreagan007
343:the lyrics
2054:noted by
1827:¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1566:ownership
1167:permalink
1034:DanCherek
1019:DanCherek
732:Ditobolli
609:WP:GAMING
297:Not moved
260:not moved
191:Pop music
182:pop music
138:Pop music
2036:SnowFire
1416:SnowFire
1375:SnowFire
1347:WP:VPPRO
1294:Dicklyon
823:hundreds
812:Flooded
702:WP:TALKO
687:contribs
675:unsigned
658:WP:VPPOL
582:exist.--
500:Dekimasu
479:Jax 0677
301:Dekimasu
1789:sources
1596:Amakuru
1594:RM. —
1552:Comment
1315:Darkday
1307:Support
1286:Support
1265:Support
1229:Support
1208:Support
1105:WP:RMTR
1086:As per
728:Oppose
613:WP:IDHT
517:Andrewa
513:Support
492:Comment
475:Oppose
444:Darkday
420:Support
371:Laundry
351:Amakuru
318:Cameron
218:on the
2108:WP:AGF
2087:Oppose
2052:WP:VPP
2041:MOS:CT
2031:MOS:CT
2027:Oppose
1967:BD2412
1907:BD2412
1889:BD2412
1878:Oppose
1801:BD2412
1583:Oppose
1396:Oppose
1328:Oppose
1311:MOS:CT
1269:MOS:CT
1088:WP:PCM
1045:WP:IAR
1015:WP:PCM
458:Oppose
428:MOS:CT
399:Oppose
365:Oppose
306:WT:MOS
47:scale.
2114:: -->
2113:: -->
1986:: -->
1985:: -->
1926:: -->
1925:: -->
1831:: -->
1830:: -->
1751:: -->
1750:: -->
1681:: -->
1680:: -->
1624:: -->
1623:: -->
1476:: -->
1475:: -->
1470:never
1124:: -->
1123:: -->
1054:: -->
1053:: -->
980:: -->
979:: -->
941:mello
861:: -->
860:: -->
770:|ans=
760:This
662:WP:MR
565:RKJ 5
374:Pizza
321:11598
248:moved
104:Songs
95:songs
70:Songs
2131:talk
2078:talk
2070:rule
2062:Like
2045:like
2029:Per
2003:talk
1943:talk
1921:like
1880:per
1848:talk
1818:like
1768:talk
1746:Ty$
1734:like
1720:talk
1698:talk
1670:talk
1641:talk
1612:and
1600:talk
1585:per
1574:talk
1537:talk
1493:talk
1420:talk
1410:100%
1383:talk
1337:talk
1319:talk
1309:per
1298:talk
1290:like
1277:talk
1241:like
1199:talk
1195:Deor
1191:like
1175:talk
1141:talk
1113:talk
1096:talk
1071:talk
1040:like
1023:talk
997:talk
878:talk
845:talk
806:Done
791:talk
736:talk
709:Life
683:talk
646:STID
615:and
569:talk
521:talk
483:talk
466:talk
448:talk
424:like
411:talk
355:talk
258:was
2039:.
1823:WP:
1744:or
1740:as
1523:😼
1465:not
1455:😼
1363:😼
1257:😼
1169:).
975:not
946:hi!
808:--
768:or
718:Tau
537:.
434:,
308:.
250:to
210:Mid
2163::
2140:—
2080:)
2012:—
1952:—
1884:.
1857:—
1777:—
1722:)
1707:—
1672:)
1650:—
1602:)
1576:)
1539:)
1511:—
1502:—
1443:—
1422:)
1385:)
1351:—
1349:.
1339:)
1321:)
1300:)
1279:)
1245:—
1201:)
1177:)
1150:—
1115:)
1098:)
1080:—
1025:)
1006:—
963:→
953:)
951:投稿
938:,
934:—
906:.
887:—
847:)
793:)
774:no
738:)
714:of
689:)
685:•
571:)
523:)
504:よ!
485:)
468:)
450:)
442:.
438:,
413:)
392:)
389:c̄
377:03
357:)
335:→
316:--
280:.
2137:)
2125:(
2076:(
2009:)
1997:(
1974:T
1949:)
1937:(
1909::
1905:@
1896:T
1854:)
1842:(
1808:T
1774:)
1762:(
1718:(
1704:)
1692:(
1668:(
1647:)
1635:(
1598:(
1572:(
1535:(
1521:¢
1518:☏
1499:)
1487:(
1453:¢
1450:☏
1433:"
1418:(
1381:(
1361:¢
1358:☏
1335:(
1317:(
1296:(
1275:(
1255:¢
1252:☏
1219:Ø
1214:N
1197:(
1173:(
1147:)
1135:(
1111:(
1094:(
1077:)
1065:(
1036::
1032:@
1021:(
1003:)
991:(
949:(
932:)
928:(
884:)
872:(
843:(
789:(
734:(
704:.
681:(
627:.
596:Ø
587:N
567:(
519:(
481:(
464:(
454:*
446:(
409:(
384:d
381:(
353:(
314:)
310:(
262:.
222:.
53::
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
