99:
39:
21:
250:*Sigh* Why are you even bothering to edit anything on here? Your logic, if I can call it that, means anything "fictional" has no validity on this site because it would be based on secondary sources except those of the work itself. In that case...we'd better started tagging the works of Shakespeare, Longfellow, Poe,
142:
Not quite an obscure movie - actually a huge hit. The details listed by this article are emphatically stated and emphasised throughout the film - it is not like bits of obscure trivia only a true fan could ever know. That said, no realy reason why this should not be rolled back into the main article.
292:
As for
Autofellatio and buttplugs, you can't prove they are not fictional, unless you own or are a practitioner of such disgusting articles. Using again, your own illogic, it would seem to suggest that the only people fit to edit pages like these are those that practise such things. As they are → de
271:
My sarcasm is to demonstrates that you have a complete inability to understand how sources work. The film is the primary source, like any play by Shaw or Keats. This means unless they left a literary review of their works, any commentary about the content of the work is secondary as it did not come
183:
Yet there are repeated calls to get rid of this article? Why! What harm does an article like this do? None, that I can see. It's just giving a wider audience a little more information about a titular structure that appeared in a very famous/well known/watched movie. IS that not what
Knowledge is
173:
It makes me laugh how
Knowledge works. How some articles can be so introspective and self serving yet other articles like this one, which just gives an added perspective on a famous cinematic tower has its notability questioned. Which if it's not well known, raises the question of rhetorical
157:
I agree. Do we really need this article? There are no citations or anything (I guess I shouldn't be talking since I do that a lot myself). The movie was a hit, but we could still just merge it with the movie.
130:
ah yes, a needlessly detailed article full of needless speculation based on a fictional building from a mildly obscure movie made thirty years ago. This is why I love the internet.
210:
But an article about the named structure in an iconic 1970s' disaster film (which spawned a whole themed industry for the next decade) must be expunged from
Knowledge.
109:
312:
65:
61:
46:
26:
254:
for immediate deletion as they all contain fictional "characters" which can only ever be discussed through secondary sources = Hamlet.
185:
105:
159:
51:
131:
176:
115:
98:
232:
293:
facto primary sources....any books written by non practitioner are entirely secondary evidence.
219:
215:
148:
214:
Autofellatio and buttplugs aren't fictional. All this topic needs to stay around is some
224:
306:
174:
questions, because the article's subject, is by the nature of the film's own title:
200:
144:
191:
It sad to think that the
Knowledge Project must protect (in the interests
204:
196:
38:
20:
237:
152:
134:
184:
meant to do? Provide information; where is the assumption of "
93:
56:
64:, where you can join the project or contribute to the
54:pages on Knowledge. If you wish to help, you can
180:, er the central issue of the piece. Is it not?
44:This disambiguation page is within the scope of
272:from the original source: the author, creator
199:or that future generations need to understand
8:
50:, an attempt to structure and organize all
15:
60:attached to this talk page, or visit the
17:
7:
195:) articles on the usage of the word
188:" or that all articles must fit a ?
74:Knowledge:WikiProject Disambiguation
77:Template:WikiProject Disambiguation
14:
313:WikiProject Disambiguation pages
97:
37:
19:
104:This article was nominated for
1:
238:05:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
143:Not really all that notable.
108:on 9 May 2010. The result of
329:
222:into the movie's article.
135:00:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
47:WikiProject Disambiguation
162:23:15, May 16, 2009 (UTC)
153:08:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
32:
218:, or maybe it should be
80:Disambiguation articles
193:our shared knowledge
177:The Towering Inferno
116:The Towering Inferno
160:Irish Techno Zombie
216:secondary sources
123:
122:
92:
91:
88:
87:
320:
236:
229:
101:
94:
82:
81:
78:
75:
72:
59:
41:
34:
33:
23:
16:
328:
327:
323:
322:
321:
319:
318:
317:
303:
302:
225:
223:
171:
128:
79:
76:
73:
70:
69:
55:
12:
11:
5:
326:
324:
316:
315:
305:
304:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
241:
240:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
163:
155:
127:
124:
121:
120:
110:the discussion
102:
90:
89:
86:
85:
83:
71:Disambiguation
52:disambiguation
42:
30:
29:
27:Disambiguation
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
325:
314:
311:
310:
308:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
275:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
253:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
234:
230:
228:
221:
217:
213:
212:
211:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
189:
187:
181:
179:
178:
168:
161:
156:
154:
150:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
133:
132:75.75.110.235
125:
118:
117:
111:
107:
103:
100:
96:
95:
84:
67:
63:
58:
57:edit the page
53:
49:
48:
43:
40:
36:
35:
31:
28:
25:
22:
18:
273:
251:
226:
209:
201:autofellatio
192:
190:
182:
175:
172:
129:
113:
62:project page
45:
186:good faith
169:Notability
126:Notability
66:discussion
233:reasoning
227:Abductive
205:buttplugs
114:merge to
307:Category
106:deletion
220:merged
197:nigger
145:Format
252:et al
149:talk
112:was
274:etc
207:.
203:or
309::
151:)
235:)
231:(
147:(
119:.
68:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
