71:
53:
22:
125:
226:
I'd tend to agree that EH is the most reliable, or at least the most official, even if I've noted in the past that they too make mistakes, possibly in scanning the reports to the computer. If you could try too ask it would be great; my personal opinion is that
Heritage Counts, which gives a number of
203:
Yeah, I noticed that as well when I was playing around with the
Barsham article and Roos Hall - the WDC pdf I have from 2007 lists only the church in Barsham as Grade I, but EH list 3 places - the 3 we have on this list - all from ages and ages ago. V odd - perhaps I'll take a look at the WDC website
174:
Thanks for your kind words :-) As for the question, if I interpretate it correctly, is if I don't risk overlinking the locations; the awnser is that since this is a sortable table, it's common to link all localities more than once, or at least this is the norm in making lists of listed buildings: see
179:. And thanks for catching my mistakes! My only really worry here concerns the number of listed buildings: the the Waveney district list only mentions 48 Grade I listed buildings, and Listed Buildings Online 49, but the list I'm working with has 61 entries, while the Images of England statistics
251:
I'll see if I can take some pics at some point later this summer to fill some of this out. A lot of the village articles could use a pic as well. I've worked out who I need to talk to (or the dept anyway) at WDC, but it might take a while for me to get in touch with them :-) --
204:
and see if there's a contact who looks after such lists to badger? Doesn't matter if we have some which might be debatable - we can always use a note I spose? But there must be a definitive list - I imagine the EH stuff is the most accurate. I'd hope so anyways.
271:, a creative commons project. As for the doubts with the list, I've decided for now to keep them in, even if some are pretty suspicious, like the 2 barns in South Cove, that IoE itself says they were inserted among listed buildings only for "group value".--
176:
159:
Good work with this - I'll leave you to it mainly! Feels like lots of work... Should every instance of the places have links do you think though or just the first one? --
267:
Sorry for my late awnser, but I've been incredibly oberated with work, which is, BTW, the same as yours. I've staeted uploading to wikipedia images taking them from the
141:
343:
339:
325:
429:
460:
465:
87:
406:
455:
78:
58:
311:
295:
321:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
144:
on 15 October 2022 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see
33:
386:
436:
257:
209:
164:
180:
342:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
227:
58 structures, is the most reliable; unfotunately, they only give numbers, not a list of the listed buildings.--
39:
432:
410:
377:
312:
http://www.webcitation.org/6Dus2kPHo?url=http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/
303:
253:
205:
160:
21:
182:(updated to 2001) mention 55 for Waveney; a more recent count from an English Heritage report mentions 58
268:
361:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
349:
183:
86:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
302:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
315:
137:
440:
422:
418:
391:
280:
261:
236:
213:
194:
168:
346:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
362:
402:
369:
276:
232:
190:
414:
328:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
70:
52:
368:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
335:
185:
Grade I listed buildings (updated April 2006). It's all quite bewildering. Any idea?--
449:
83:
334:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
272:
228:
186:
405:
as a district no longer exists there may be a case to merge this page with
316:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/caring/listing/listed-buildings/
430:
Talk:Grade I listed buildings in
Suffolk Coastal#Possible Merger?
409:
to form a new list to represent Grade I listed buildings in the
119:
15:
306:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
299:
145:
132:
82:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
338:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
177:List of Grade I listed buildings in North Somerset
142:Grade I listed buildings in East Suffolk District
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
324:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
407:Grade I listed buildings in Suffolk Coastal
294:I have just modified one external link on
96:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Historic sites
47:
49:
461:NA-importance Historic sites articles
76:This redirect is within the scope of
19:
7:
466:WikiProject Historic sites articles
296:Grade I listed buildings in Waveney
133:Grade I listed buildings in Waveney
99:Template:WikiProject Historic sites
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
413:area reflecting the new council.
298:. Please take a moment to review
456:NA-Class Historic sites articles
123:
69:
51:
20:
1:
90:and see a list of open tasks.
441:15:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
482:
392:21:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
355:(last update: 5 June 2024)
291:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
262:22:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
237:17:44, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
214:16:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
195:15:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
169:07:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
79:WikiProject Historic sites
64:
46:
423:10:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
411:East Suffolk (district)
287:External links modified
281:02:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
102:Historic sites articles
269:Geograph British Isles
336:regular verification
130:The contents of the
326:After February 2018
380:InternetArchiveBot
331:InternetArchiveBot
34:content assessment
433:Blue Square Thing
356:
254:Blue Square Thing
206:Blue Square Thing
161:Blue Square Thing
152:
151:
118:
117:
114:
113:
110:
109:
473:
397:Possible merger?
390:
381:
354:
353:
332:
135:
127:
126:
120:
104:
103:
100:
97:
94:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
446:
445:
399:
384:
379:
347:
340:have permission
330:
304:this simple FaQ
289:
249:
157:
131:
124:
101:
98:
95:
92:
91:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
469:
468:
463:
458:
448:
447:
444:
443:
398:
395:
374:
373:
366:
319:
318:
310:Added archive
288:
285:
284:
283:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
219:
218:
217:
216:
198:
197:
156:
153:
150:
149:
128:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
105:
93:Historic sites
88:the discussion
84:historic sites
74:
62:
61:
59:Historic sites
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
453:
451:
442:
438:
434:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
396:
394:
393:
388:
383:
382:
371:
367:
364:
360:
359:
358:
351:
345:
341:
337:
333:
327:
322:
317:
313:
309:
308:
307:
305:
301:
297:
292:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
265:
264:
263:
259:
255:
246:
238:
234:
230:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
215:
211:
207:
202:
201:
200:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
173:
172:
171:
170:
166:
162:
154:
147:
143:
139:
134:
129:
122:
121:
106:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
400:
378:
375:
350:source check
329:
323:
320:
293:
290:
250:
158:
77:
40:WikiProjects
29:
146:its history
450:Categories
387:Report bug
136:page were
415:Qazwsx777
370:this tool
363:this tool
175:featured
376:Cheers.—
247:Pictures
30:redirect
403:Waveney
300:my edit
138:merged
36:scale.
273:Aldux
229:Aldux
187:Aldux
155:Table
140:into
28:This
437:talk
428:See
419:talk
277:talk
258:talk
233:talk
210:talk
191:talk
165:talk
401:As
344:RfC
314:to
452::
439:)
421:)
357:.
352:}}
348:{{
279:)
260:)
235:)
212:)
193:)
167:)
435:(
417:(
389:)
385:(
372:.
365:.
275:(
256:(
231:(
208:(
189:(
163:(
148:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
