71:
53:
173:
155:
580:
81:
600:
22:
129:
183:
243:
312:
975:
918:
article focuses mostly on computer graphics and the math behind them and this article focuses on drawing techniques as you said, but I see no reason that can't be handled with different sections within one article. They're still closely related aside from one being done with algorithms. Having used
705:
I don't see any reference to "general" projection. All I mean by the term is the act of projecting a point in n dimensions onto a space of m dimensions, where m < n. Standard 3D graphics pipelines (as described in this article, also in games, ray-tracing, etc) are the case where n = 3 and m = 2.
844:
Yes, I mean expanded. Sorry. There are a lot of separate articles here, and I don't think dividing the current text in even more articles helps here. What is needed is one overview article, which explains all different aspects. I have written one for the Dutch
Knowledge, which expressed this ideal.
823:
Do you mean 'expanded' instead of 'expended'? If you meant expanded, I agree. However, expanding the article doesn't mean that it shouldn't be split. The template provides the necessary guide to the material. It is confusing to the reader to include material that is stated elsewhere. The text
919:
methods from both articles, I'd say they're really the same subject (although the more computer focused parts might be expanded to include various other types such as curved projections that are less-used in drawings with pen and paper) and finding both in one place isn't going to confuse anyone.
626:
So the fact that each 3d dimention is distorted equally (45 degree) means that accurate scale drawings can be made, because a 3d line of length x will always be projected as a 2d line of length cx, irrespective of the line's orientation. This feature makes
Planometric images look ugly as sin, but
575:{\displaystyle {\begin{bmatrix}x'\\y'\\z'\\1\end{bmatrix}}={\begin{bmatrix}\cos {\frac {\pi }{4}}&-\cos {\frac {\pi }{4}}&0&0\\\sin {\frac {\pi }{4}}&-\sin {\frac {\pi }{4}}&1&0\\0&0&0&0\\0&0&0&1\end{bmatrix}}{\begin{bmatrix}x\\y\\z\\1\end{bmatrix}}}
894:
to here, as they are basically the same topic. The only difference is that this article is for techniques "without the aid of numerical calculation". Which I don't think is an important criteria, considering most of the small summaries and articles this page links to ignore it. Thoughts?
614:
Yes. That's it. But it's not the same as oblique. But I don't have any references, and I don't know how widely used it is. Yet I still learn it at school so I thought it should be included. Can't you use wherever you got that image as a reference?
845:
And I rearranged the whole category structure in
Wikicommons making the Graphical projection category the top category in the field. I didn't get to it to rearrange this article yet, but I would like it to become an overvied article. --
747:
This seems like a personal point of view, that graphical projection is subset of this more general field? As far as I know graphical projection is a collection of methods, which principles have been developed in the
937:
would seem to be the better target because the title is broader (that it, the definition does not exclude any particular method), the article is older, and it current has more direct links.
766:
I don't think it's a matter of opinion, but I could be wrong. This page talks about different ways to take a 3-dimensional object and "project" it to form a 2-dimensional image.
808:
which removed most of tyhe content of this article. I think this article shouldn't be reduced but expended and explain all items allready mentioned in the template views. --
1025:
1015:
871:
about whether stereographic projection is truly a "graphical projection", according to the definition in this article. Your advice would be appreciated.
137:
1030:
1005:
776:"For example, the function which maps the point (x, y, z) in three-dimensional space R3 to the point (x, y, 0) is a projection onto the x-y plane."
1010:
727:. Is it worth mentioning in the introduction (to "graphical projection") that that graphical projection is subset of this more general field? -
1020:
955:
is the better target and will proceed that way. If this turns out to be disputed, we can always move the merged article as a separate step. ~
205:
924:
196:
160:
642:
868:
94:
58:
920:
33:
831:
771:
767:
724:
281:
Note that a page needs creating on
Oblique Projection and added as a link after "oblique Projection" on this page.
293:
Isn't
Axonometric projection a sub-category under Orthographic projection? If so, it should be properly nested.
686:. That is (of course!) a disambiguation page. I'd disambiguate if I were sure of which article to link to.
691:
21:
266:
and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see
827:
86:
294:
39:
630:
784:
749:
733:
712:
634:
616:
584:
204:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
687:
657:
638:
594:
942:
255:
188:
660:
lists that projection (military projection), so I guess it counts as an oblique projection? —
902:
876:
706:
Most likely, I'm not finding it because I just don't know the proper term to search for. -
103:
599:
70:
52:
987:
960:
779:
728:
707:
282:
172:
154:
999:
952:
934:
915:
891:
850:
813:
757:
665:
604:
259:
938:
897:
872:
128:
991:
964:
946:
928:
908:
880:
854:
835:
817:
789:
761:
738:
717:
695:
669:
646:
619:
607:
587:
297:
201:
182:
178:
76:
983:
956:
778:
That's the mathematical description of all the projections discussed here. -
770:
is about how to do exactly the same thing, but in N dimensions. Quote from
846:
809:
753:
683:
661:
99:
914:
I agree. The only distinction I can make right now is that the
307:
What about listing planometric projection on this page? Where,
237:
15:
127:
805:
267:
250:
537:
379:
321:
315:
200:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
593:Got a reference for that? It looks like a kind of
574:
682:The very first sentence of this article links to
8:
98:, which collaborates on articles related to
149:
47:
532:
460:
439:
409:
388:
374:
316:
314:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
151:
49:
597:to me, in fact it's this one I think:
194:This redirect is within the scope of
136:This redirect is within the field of
92:This redirect is within the scope of
19:
7:
627:also makes the projection notable.
824:was essentially moved, not deleted.
800:Further development of this article
38:It is of interest to the following
1026:Redirect-Class Technology articles
14:
1016:Systems articles in visualization
973:
598:
241:
214:Knowledge:WikiProject Technology
181:
171:
153:
79:
69:
51:
20:
1031:WikiProject Technology articles
1006:Redirect-Class Systems articles
933:Overall I support a merge, but
217:Template:WikiProject Technology
1011:NA-importance Systems articles
881:11:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
1:
869:Talk:Stereographic projection
696:20:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
670:14:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
620:09:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
608:09:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
588:04:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
208:and see a list of open tasks.
112:Knowledge:WikiProject Systems
1021:WikiProject Systems articles
992:16:09, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
965:15:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
298:06:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
115:Template:WikiProject Systems
947:22:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
855:02:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
836:02:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
818:21:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
772:Projection (linear algebra)
768:Projection (linear algebra)
725:Projection (linear algebra)
1047:
929:22:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
867:There is a discussion at
863:Stereographic projection?
289:Problem with nested links
285:23:17, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
166:
135:
64:
46:
909:03:05, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
790:18:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
762:13:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
739:00:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
718:00:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
647:14:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
921:A Shortfall Of Gravitas
576:
303:Planometric Projection
197:WikiProject Technology
132:
87:Systems science portal
701:"General" Projection?
577:
131:
313:
251:Graphical projection
248:The contents of the
847:Marcel Douwe Dekker
810:Marcel Douwe Dekker
754:Marcel Douwe Dekker
750:projective geometry
220:Technology articles
95:WikiProject Systems
890:I suggest merging
678:Link to "protocol"
658:oblique projection
595:Oblique projection
572:
566:
526:
365:
277:Oblique Projection
133:
34:content assessment
828:Trihoiseachaithne
649:
633:comment added by
468:
447:
417:
396:
274:
273:
236:
235:
232:
231:
228:
227:
189:Technology portal
148:
147:
144:
143:
1038:
981:
977:
976:
907:
905:
900:
782:
731:
710:
628:
602:
581:
579:
578:
573:
571:
570:
531:
530:
469:
461:
448:
440:
418:
410:
397:
389:
370:
369:
355:
343:
331:
265:
253:
245:
244:
238:
222:
221:
218:
215:
212:
191:
186:
185:
175:
168:
167:
157:
150:
120:
119:
118:Systems articles
116:
113:
110:
89:
84:
83:
82:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1037:
1036:
1035:
996:
995:
974:
972:
903:
898:
896:
888:
865:
802:
787:
780:
736:
729:
715:
708:
703:
680:
565:
564:
558:
557:
551:
550:
544:
543:
533:
525:
524:
519:
514:
509:
503:
502:
497:
492:
487:
481:
480:
475:
470:
449:
430:
429:
424:
419:
398:
375:
364:
363:
357:
356:
348:
345:
344:
336:
333:
332:
324:
317:
311:
310:
305:
291:
279:
263:
249:
242:
219:
216:
213:
210:
209:
187:
180:
117:
114:
111:
108:
107:
104:systems science
85:
80:
78:
12:
11:
5:
1044:
1042:
1034:
1033:
1028:
1023:
1018:
1013:
1008:
998:
997:
970:
969:
968:
967:
949:
887:
884:
864:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
839:
838:
825:
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
785:
742:
741:
734:
713:
702:
699:
679:
676:
675:
674:
673:
672:
651:
650:
623:
622:
611:
610:
569:
563:
560:
559:
556:
553:
552:
549:
546:
545:
542:
539:
538:
536:
529:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
504:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
482:
479:
476:
474:
471:
467:
464:
459:
456:
453:
450:
446:
443:
438:
435:
432:
431:
428:
425:
423:
420:
416:
413:
408:
405:
402:
399:
395:
392:
387:
384:
381:
380:
378:
373:
368:
362:
359:
358:
354:
351:
347:
346:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
327:
323:
322:
320:
304:
301:
295:67.170.168.214
290:
287:
278:
275:
272:
271:
246:
234:
233:
230:
229:
226:
225:
223:
206:the discussion
193:
192:
176:
164:
163:
158:
146:
145:
142:
141:
134:
124:
123:
121:
91:
90:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1043:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1022:
1019:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1009:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1001:
994:
993:
989:
985:
980:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:3D projection
951:I also think
950:
948:
944:
940:
936:
935:3D projection
932:
931:
930:
926:
922:
917:
916:3D projection
913:
912:
911:
910:
906:
901:
893:
892:3D projection
885:
883:
882:
878:
874:
870:
862:
856:
852:
848:
843:
842:
841:
840:
837:
833:
829:
826:
822:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
807:
804:I just undid
799:
791:
788:
783:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:
763:
759:
755:
751:
746:
745:
744:
743:
740:
737:
732:
726:
722:
721:
720:
719:
716:
711:
700:
698:
697:
693:
689:
688:Michael Hardy
685:
677:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
636:
632:
625:
624:
621:
618:
613:
612:
609:
606:
601:
596:
592:
591:
590:
589:
586:
582:
567:
561:
554:
547:
540:
534:
527:
521:
516:
511:
506:
499:
494:
489:
484:
477:
472:
465:
462:
457:
454:
451:
444:
441:
436:
433:
426:
421:
414:
411:
406:
403:
400:
393:
390:
385:
382:
376:
371:
366:
360:
352:
349:
340:
337:
328:
325:
318:
308:
302:
300:
299:
296:
288:
286:
284:
276:
269:
261:
260:3D projection
257:
252:
247:
240:
239:
224:
207:
203:
199:
198:
190:
184:
179:
177:
174:
170:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
139:
138:Visualization
130:
126:
125:
122:
105:
101:
97:
96:
88:
77:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
978:
971:
889:
866:
803:
775:
704:
681:
656:The article
583:
309:
306:
292:
280:
195:
93:
40:WikiProjects
29:
629:—Preceding
268:its history
1000:Categories
723:Found it:
264:2019-01-13
254:page were
211:Technology
202:technology
161:Technology
806:this edit
781:LesPaul75
730:LesPaul75
709:LesPaul75
684:protocol
643:contribs
635:Stestagg
631:unsigned
617:Me121121
605:Allefant
585:Me121121
30:redirect
939:Klbrain
109:Systems
100:systems
59:Systems
899:SharkD
886:Merger
873:Mgnbar
256:merged
36:scale.
904:Talk
752:. --
258:into
28:This
988:talk
984:Kvng
979:Done
961:talk
957:Kvng
943:talk
925:talk
877:talk
851:talk
832:talk
814:talk
786:talk
758:talk
735:talk
714:talk
692:talk
666:talk
639:talk
102:and
662:Kri
455:sin
434:sin
404:cos
383:cos
283:Pat
262:on
1002::
990:)
963:)
945:)
927:)
879:)
853:)
834:)
816:)
774::
760:)
694:)
668:)
645:)
641:•
603:--
463:π
458:
452:−
442:π
437:
412:π
407:
401:−
391:π
386:
986:(
982:~
959:(
941:(
923:(
875:(
849:(
830:(
812:(
756:(
690:(
664:(
637:(
568:]
562:1
555:z
548:y
541:x
535:[
528:]
522:1
517:0
512:0
507:0
500:0
495:0
490:0
485:0
478:0
473:1
466:4
445:4
427:0
422:0
415:4
394:4
377:[
372:=
367:]
361:1
353:′
350:z
341:′
338:y
329:′
326:x
319:[
270:.
140:.
106:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
