84:
74:
53:
644:
656:
599:
632:
587:
22:
375:
299:
223:
712:
For the Kepler-Poinsot solids, I think it would be better to forego the symmetric colouring, and instead use an arrangement of multiple colours so that neighbouring faces do not share the same colour. This should let the faces stand out more while keeping consistent lighting. Unfortunately my copy of
708:
On further examination of the SVG, I see that different parts of the same triangular face have different shades of red that cannot be explained by their orientation (because the parts oriented towards the viewer are darker instead of brighter). This is pretty much the same problem as the inconsistent
666:
I'm not sure what's meant about it being "nigh-impenetrable". The SVG looks pretty intelligible to me. Furthermore, I can't see that "indecisive on when shadows should exist for the edges" is sufficient grounds for rejecting that image. Surely, what's most important is that it's not misleading.
671:
misleading: as a result of several face orientations having the same shade of red, together with the absence of edge lines where faces intersect, some of the hollows appear as flat faces, and therefore it shows a number of the faces as being pentagrams. In fact, all the faces are triangles.
717:
should be able to do this (IIRC Stella has such schemes listed as icosahedral colour arrangements or something similar). In the meantime, however, the lighting concerns lead me to favour the current PNG until such a replacement is made (preferably for the other three regular stars as well).
753:
Thanks! I think both versions (multicoloured PNG and original PNG) are good now. I prefer the multicoloured one as the lede image, but not strongly since sometimes the pure red one reflecting its symmetries makes more sense (as in the truncation sequence further down the article).
494:
I'll ask around where the name came from. Norman
Johnson named all the full symmetry constructions. Richard Klitzing has the only list I know for all of the Wythoff constructions and includes 3 names: great icosahedron, retrosnub tetrahedron, retrosnub tetratetrahedron.
401:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
325:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
249:; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
140:
612:'s comment on reverting to the PNG: "that SVG which is nigh-impenetrable at small sizes and seems oddly indecisive on when shadows should exist for the edges - nah, not better"
790:
Thanks both. It's certainly better now. Not perfect, but better. It really ought to be an SVG, but anyhow. Can't make up my mind what I think to the coloured version.... —
675:
This isn't to say the SVG can't be improved. But since the PNG is misleading, I can't see it as being better on any level. As such, I say the right course of action is:
709:
shadows on some edges. So I would claim that the SVG is actually more misleading as it doesn't reflect how the great icosahedron looks from any angle, while the PNG does.
305:
229:
834:
130:
829:
200:
381:
106:
204:
167:
499:
97:
58:
732:
I added a multicolored face version above, similar orientation. I also remade the original one to better show face-plane shading.
643:
456:
428:
352:
276:
804:
I'm glad to help. I agree SVG can be superior, but I did upload as a large 2000x2000 pixel image (slightly smaller cropped).
526:
533:
for its octahedral/pyritohedral construction in 2002 and 2006 messages. But I still can't say about published references.
197:
33:
424:
348:
272:
619:
655:
631:
598:
586:
21:
447:
194:
190:
759:
723:
679:
Produce an SVG that shows, accurately and more clearly at small sizes, what a great icosahedron looks like
563:
171:
682:
If this can't be done quickly, then use the existing SVG for the time being, as the lesser of two evils.
484:
39:
83:
518:
460:
452:
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
186:
89:
73:
52:
809:
778:
755:
737:
719:
609:
559:
538:
507:
385:
309:
233:
480:
795:
691:
406:
330:
254:
823:
713:
Stella (the software that made the original PNG) died with my previous computer, but
413:
337:
261:
558:
Coxeter lists the | 2 3/2 3/2 construction in his paper, but doesn't name it, IIRC.
496:
805:
785:
748:
733:
714:
534:
503:
476:
182:
475:
This name is not supported by the references given. I strongly suspect that it is
102:
479:
and needs to be deleted. Can anybody confirm a source for this name? — Cheers,
162:
Why is it that the net of the great icosahedron is not given? Presumably there
374:
298:
222:
79:
409:
then you may need to upload it to
Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
333:
then you may need to upload it to
Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
257:
then you may need to upload it to
Knowledge (Commons does not allow fair use)
791:
703:
687:
799:
763:
741:
727:
695:
567:
542:
511:
488:
464:
432:
356:
280:
207:
175:
551:
41 {2 3/2 3/2} s*TT = Retrosnub tetratetrahedron = great icosahedron
290:
File:Second compound stellation of icosahedron.png
Nominated for Deletion
214:
File:Third compound stellation of icosahedron.png
Nominated for Deletion
548:
41 {3/2}|4 2| s*O = Retrosnub octahedron = great icosahedron
448:
Talk:Great_dodecahedron#Conway-style_notation_for_star_polyhedra
366:
File:First stellation of icosahedron.png
Nominated for Deletion
15:
193:. See the mathworld article on the great icosahedron.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
412:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
336:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
260:If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no
306:File:Second compound stellation of icosahedron.png
230:File:Third compound stellation of icosahedron.png
181:To make the great icosahedron you start with a
625:. At the size they're shown in this article:
8:
615:This is applicable to both this article and
189:dimples. In the dimples one needs to affix
19:
47:
502:, sr{3/2,5/3}, compared to sr{3/2,3/2}.
442:Conway-style notation for star polyhedra
382:File:First stellation of icosahedron.png
627:
582:
49:
421:This notification is provided by a Bot
345:This notification is provided by a Bot
269:This notification is provided by a Bot
384:, has been nominated for deletion at
308:, has been nominated for deletion at
232:, has been nominated for deletion at
7:
95:This article is within the scope of
416:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
340:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
264:then it cannot be uploaded or used.
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
835:Low-priority mathematics articles
500:great retrosnub icosidodecahedron
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
830:Start-Class mathematics articles
654:
642:
630:
597:
585:
390:Deletion requests September 2011
373:
314:Deletion requests September 2011
297:
238:Deletion requests September 2011
221:
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
380:An image used in this article,
304:An image used in this article,
228:An image used in this article,
135:This article has been rated as
543:12:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
517:I found message archives from
512:10:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
489:09:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
1:
649:Great icosahedron colored.png
465:18:04, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
433:11:01, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
357:10:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
281:10:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
109:and see a list of open tasks.
576:The two images of this shape
388:in the following category:
312:in the following category:
236:in the following category:
208:14:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
851:
568:23:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
525:as far back as 1996, and
176:10:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
800:14:31, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
764:14:11, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
742:10:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
728:02:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
696:21:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
425:CommonsNotificationBot
349:CommonsNotificationBot
273:CommonsNotificationBot
28:This article is rated
661:Great icosahedron.svg
637:Great icosahedron.png
604:Great icosahedron.svg
592:Great icosahedron.png
523:retrosnub tetrahedron
471:Retrosnub tetrahedron
191:pentagrammic pyramids
580:Currently, we have:
531:retrosnub octahedron
121:mathematics articles
498:. It is similar to
667:The PNG certainly
414:fair use rationale
338:fair use rationale
262:fair use rationale
187:pentagonal pyramid
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
610:User:Double sharp
455:comment added by
439:
438:
394:What should I do?
386:Wikimedia Commons
363:
362:
318:What should I do?
310:Wikimedia Commons
287:
286:
242:What should I do?
234:Wikimedia Commons
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
842:
789:
782:
752:
707:
658:
646:
634:
624:
620:Reg polyhedra db
618:
601:
589:
519:George Olshevsky
467:
405:If the image is
377:
370:
369:
329:If the image is
301:
294:
293:
253:If the image is
225:
218:
217:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
850:
849:
845:
844:
843:
841:
840:
839:
820:
819:
783:
776:
746:
701:
662:
659:
650:
647:
638:
635:
622:
616:
605:
602:
593:
590:
578:
473:
450:
444:
368:
292:
216:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
848:
846:
838:
837:
832:
822:
821:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
802:
769:
768:
767:
766:
730:
710:
684:
683:
680:
664:
663:
660:
653:
651:
648:
641:
639:
636:
629:
607:
606:
603:
596:
594:
591:
584:
577:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
553:
552:
549:
527:Norman Johnson
515:
514:
472:
469:
443:
440:
437:
436:
418:
417:
410:
396:
395:
378:
367:
364:
361:
360:
342:
341:
334:
320:
319:
302:
291:
288:
285:
284:
266:
265:
258:
244:
243:
226:
215:
212:
211:
210:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
847:
836:
833:
831:
828:
827:
825:
811:
807:
803:
801:
797:
793:
787:
780:
775:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
765:
761:
757:
750:
745:
744:
743:
739:
735:
731:
729:
725:
721:
716:
711:
705:
700:
699:
698:
697:
693:
689:
681:
678:
677:
676:
673:
670:
657:
652:
645:
640:
633:
628:
626:
621:
613:
611:
600:
595:
588:
583:
581:
575:
569:
565:
561:
557:
556:
555:
554:
550:
547:
546:
545:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:calling it a
520:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
493:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
470:
468:
466:
462:
458:
454:
449:
441:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
415:
411:
408:
404:
403:
402:
400:
393:
392:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
372:
371:
365:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
339:
335:
332:
328:
327:
326:
324:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
303:
300:
296:
295:
289:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
263:
259:
256:
252:
251:
250:
248:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
220:
219:
213:
209:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
779:Double sharp
756:Double sharp
720:Double sharp
686:Comments? —
685:
674:
668:
665:
614:
608:
579:
560:Double sharp
530:
522:
516:
474:
451:— Preceding
445:
420:
419:
398:
397:
389:
344:
343:
322:
321:
313:
268:
267:
246:
245:
237:
183:dodecahedron
168:116.14.72.74
166:be a net. --
163:
161:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
529:also added
481:Steelpillow
399:Don't panic
323:Don't panic
247:Don't panic
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
30:Start-class
824:Categories
457:99.185.3.0
195:Professor
806:Tom Ruen
734:Tom Ruen
535:Tom Ruen
504:Tom Ruen
453:unsigned
407:non-free
331:non-free
255:non-free
201:Fiendish
786:Tomruen
749:Tomruen
715:Tomruen
139:on the
36:scale.
477:WP:OR
446:See:
185:with
164:would
810:talk
796:talk
792:Smjg
760:talk
738:talk
724:talk
704:Smjg
692:talk
688:Smjg
564:talk
539:talk
508:talk
485:Talk
461:talk
429:talk
353:talk
277:talk
205:Esq.
172:talk
158:Net
131:Low
826::
798:)
762:)
740:)
726:)
694:)
669:is
623:}}
617:{{
566:)
541:)
510:)
487:)
463:)
431:)
423:--
355:)
347:--
279:)
271:--
203:,
198:M.
174:)
812:)
808:(
794:(
788::
784:@
781::
777:@
758:(
751::
747:@
736:(
722:(
706::
702:@
690:(
562:(
537:(
506:(
483:(
459:(
427:(
351:(
275:(
170:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
