74:
53:
22:
84:
390:
schemes developed independently, each section would need its own history subsection and so on. It's also not clear what the title of the merged article should be. What is to be the canonical name of this type of offsetting scheme? Perhaps you could make a userspace draft of the merged article you have in mind, so others can judge whether it helps. Another option is to write a
182:'s because of the additionality principle, could comply under a certain countries'Green Certificate or REC-regime/legislation/specifications. I do not know how double counting could be avoided: e.g. how to make sure the same project is not issueing VER's, Cer's tothe USA and Green Certificates to some Europeans?--
266:
In many trade language the word certificate relates to the origin. Sometimes the words combine. In the essential effort to bring green energy, or renewable energy to consumers, who want to distinguish in what they get in a free market, it does not matter what the name is. As long as the supply of the
526:
However, the
Renewable Energy Certificates article needs to be renamed to reflect how specific the information contained within is to the US. I would propose something like "Renewable Energy Certificates (USA)", which would allow it to remain as a stand-alone article, whilst allowing new articles to
211:
Are these
European Green certificates tradeable within the EU-countries for companies to comply? A Green Certificate in Romania, Belgium, Italy should mean the same and be exchangeable no? But as the prices per country are different... and if you could trade them, they would all be sold to the most
389:
It's not clear that merging into just one article would improve them. The resulting article would be long and would need multiple sections to cover different geographic areas, and the sections could get long as these types of offsetting schemes are diverse even within a single country. Since the
206:
According to a recent
Communication from the European Commission, the green certificate system is in use in following EU Member States: Belgium, Italy, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom. More information can be found in the Communication 'The support of electricity from renewable energy sources',
444:
links to the existing parent article from the existing articles might be better than merging them. I will look around at these articles and try to grasp the structure of our existing coverage. That could take a while as we have a lot of material already. See:
235:
In Europe, nobody knows about green tags; certificate is the word. Check e.g. www.recs.org or www.aib-net.org. Also issuing processes and rules differ from what is described under Green Tags. Let's have separate spaces for and keep them linked to each other.
431:
The concept underlying these articles seems to show up in a lot of other articles. There might already be some over-arching article(s) that provide(s) the generic description the merger request seems to be aiming for (maybe:
177:
Can there be agreements between memberstates so traders can export Green
Certificates? Or between a memberstate and a CDM -country? I can imagine certain installations in CDM countries that are not eligible for
344:
merge as both articles in general talks about the same thing implemented in different regions. Merging these articles will help to create a comprehensive overview of these certificates.
162:
Are Green
Certificates used by member states to proof to the EU, they have x% of their electricity production from renewable resources? How do the other member states proof that ? --
458:
626:
622:
608:
463:
140:
453:
691:
448:
130:
523:
merge as the
Renewable Energy Certificates article provides a lot of good information specific to the US implementation of the RECs concept.
686:
106:
528:
382:
97:
58:
33:
545:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
492:
409:
372:
437:
574:
625:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
39:
21:
212:
offering country... Because there is free transport of goods and services in the EU... isn't that illegal?--
566:
532:
326:
278:
664:
644:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
632:
105:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
565:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
527:
be created relating to RECs in other countries, such as "Renewable Energy
Certificates (Australia)". --
599:
508:
479:
399:
500:
441:
391:
367:
272:
251:
217:
187:
167:
471:
416:
per merger tag since
December 2009 (not tagged by me, I just started discussion at the talk page).
376:
488:
316:
629:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
645:
558:
496:
433:
413:
362:
267:
energy is just well accounted and securely booked to their - utility meter - related account.
660:
421:
349:
652:
504:
475:
395:
474:
for articles relating to emissions trading or support mechanisms for renewable energy. --
611:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
268:
247:
213:
183:
163:
651:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
618:
680:
89:
417:
345:
617:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
575:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110221233803/http://www.green-certificate.com:80/
79:
198:
83:
672:
536:
512:
483:
425:
403:
353:
331:
282:
255:
221:
201:
191:
171:
73:
52:
359:
Define "both" articles. I count at least four which overlap this topic:
102:
578:
491:
may be the generic article describing the class of things of which
499:
are instances. I.e., it appears the merged article (actually the
179:
15:
584:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
569:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
562:
394:
article while keeping the region-specific articles. --
197:
What jurisdictions issue/use green certificates? --
304:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
621:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
459:
607:This message was posted before February 2018.
307:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
464:Special:WhatLinksHere/Renewables Obligation
19:
557:I have just modified one external link on
47:
454:Special:WhatLinksHere/Guarantee of origin
449:Special:WhatLinksHere/Green certificate
49:
596:to let others know (documentation at
375:(incidentally this title may violate
7:
298:The following discussion is closed.
95:This article is within the scope of
470:Another possibility is to create a
38:It is of interest to the following
311:The result of this discussion was
115:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Energy
14:
561:. Please take a moment to review
383:Renewables obligation certificate
579:http://www.green-certificate.com
541:The discussion above is closed.
82:
72:
51:
20:
135:This article has been rated as
692:Low-importance energy articles
256:11:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
222:11:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
192:16:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
172:16:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
513:09:26, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
493:Renewable Energy Certificates
484:07:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
426:20:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
410:Renewable Energy Certificates
404:18:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
373:Renewable Energy Certificates
109:and see a list of open tasks.
537:02:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
438:Renewable energy development
687:Start-Class energy articles
354:06:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
118:Template:WikiProject Energy
708:
673:05:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
638:(last update: 5 June 2024)
554:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
207:COM(2005) 627 final (EEA)
141:project's importance scale
332:22:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
283:22:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
134:
67:
46:
543:Please do not modify it.
301:Please do not modify it.
202:17:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
550:External links modified
503:) may already exist. --
246:I confirm and agree --
28:This article is rated
228:tags vs. certificates
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
619:regular verification
609:After February 2018
588:parameter below to
472:navigation template
368:Guarantee of origin
614:InternetArchiveBot
497:Green certificates
489:Energy certificate
98:WikiProject Energy
34:content assessment
671:
639:
559:Green certificate
434:Emissions trading
414:Green certificate
363:Green certificate
324:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
699:
667:
666:Talk to my owner
662:
637:
636:
615:
603:
329:
322:
321:
303:
286:
123:
122:
121:energy articles
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
707:
706:
702:
701:
700:
698:
697:
696:
677:
676:
670:
665:
630:
623:have permission
613:
597:
567:this simple FaQ
552:
547:
546:
501:summary article
440:). If so, then
339:
327:
317:
299:
292:
276:
264:
230:
160:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
705:
703:
695:
694:
689:
679:
678:
663:
657:
656:
649:
582:
581:
573:Added archive
551:
548:
540:
518:
517:
516:
515:
468:
467:
466:
461:
456:
451:
407:
406:
387:
386:
385:
380:
370:
365:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
315:. Not merged.
294:
293:
291:
288:
281:comment added
263:
260:
259:
244:
229:
226:
225:
209:
195:
175:
159:
156:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Low-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
704:
693:
690:
688:
685:
684:
682:
675:
674:
668:
661:
654:
650:
647:
643:
642:
641:
634:
628:
624:
620:
616:
610:
605:
601:
595:
591:
587:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
568:
564:
560:
555:
549:
544:
539:
538:
534:
530:
524:
522:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
430:
429:
428:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
384:
381:
378:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
360:
358:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
333:
330:
325:
320:
314:
310:
309:
308:
305:
302:
296:
295:
289:
287:
284:
280:
274:
270:
261:
258:
257:
253:
249:
243:
240:
237:
233:
227:
224:
223:
219:
215:
208:
204:
203:
200:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
174:
173:
169:
165:
157:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
90:Energy portal
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
658:
633:source check
612:
606:
593:
589:
585:
583:
556:
553:
542:
529:61.69.26.118
525:
520:
519:
408:
341:
340:
318:
313:no consensus
312:
306:
300:
297:
265:
245:
241:
238:
234:
231:
210:
205:
196:
176:
161:
136:
96:
40:WikiProjects
600:Sourcecheck
277:—Preceding
30:Start-class
681:Categories
505:Teratornis
476:Teratornis
396:Teratornis
328:Talk to me
232:Hey Whpq,
158:Discussion
653:this tool
646:this tool
377:WP:PLURAL
319:D O N D E
269:Bouwhuise
248:SvenAERTS
239:Regards,
214:SvenAERTS
184:SvenAERTS
164:SvenAERTS
659:Cheers.—
323:groovily
669::Online
586:checked
563:my edit
521:Against
442:hatnote
392:summary
342:Support
279:undated
139:on the
594:failed
418:Beagel
346:Beagel
262:origin
112:Energy
103:Energy
59:Energy
36:scale.
290:Merge
590:true
533:talk
509:talk
495:and
480:talk
422:talk
412:and
400:talk
350:talk
273:talk
252:talk
218:talk
199:Whpq
188:talk
168:talk
627:RfC
604:).
592:or
577:to
436:or
275:)
180:CER
131:Low
683::
640:.
635:}}
631:{{
602:}}
598:{{
535:)
511:)
482:)
424:)
402:)
352:)
254:)
242:M
220:)
190:)
170:)
655:.
648:.
531:(
507:(
478:(
420:(
398:(
379:)
348:(
285:.
271:(
250:(
216:(
186:(
166:(
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
