102:
81:
449:
50:
276:. A bunch of these references discuss contextual information (security issues with jailbreaking, reasons why people might want to jailbreak their devices, recommended software to install after jailbreaking, etc.), but I'm not sure how much of that is appropriate to include in this article, since it's information general to jailbreaking instead of specific to these tools.
21:
182:
245:
and independent sources sometimes describe the newer tools as
Greenpois0n Absinthe and sometimes just Absinthe. These tools are all distributed on the same website by the same people; overall, it seems more useful to describe them in the same article instead of in two articles. I welcome comments and
546:
I figured that including too many references was better for the article than including too few, so I erred on the side of including a bunch of references, but they directly address the subject and are not identical. I believe including
Greenpois0n Absinthe makes sense; see my reasoning in my initial
523:
along with the addition of sub-product, which is an attempt to blast it with a large number of references in a hope to avoid deletion by making it seem more notable. Do you have any comments on the cited references? I think that they're mostly routine things, some are retweets like "via Wired" and
422:
Just to clarify, the
VentureBeat article is about Absinthe, which is called Greenpois0n Absinthe in other articles. The fake tools discussed in the Ars Technica article were efforts to trick people waiting for the release of the actual Greenpois0n tool - note that the article discusses the SHAtter
358:
says "'Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." I did not have to do original research to
353:
also says "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability." It has multiple independent sources: Ars
Technica, CNet, Engadget, Forbes, International Business Times, The Inquirer, PCMag, PCWorld/NetworkWorld, ReadWriteWeb,
603:
If you'd like to comment with a list of instances where the references don't properly support the text (or similar issues), I'll see if I can suggest better references. I'm a little puzzled though about bringing up this bombardment concern after the draft was moved to the article, instead of
468:, which Greenpois0n tools install, but the tools are mostly outdated, so I don't really benefit from a better article about them. I also chose to not mention Cydia in the draft to avoid impressions of bias. Note that this article is currently
464:
I'd like to ask for review of my proposed draft below, since I believe it's at least better than the current state of the article. I have a minor COI on this - I work for the company that makes
233:. Other editors had added material on Absinthe to this article a few months ago, but I removed their additions due to not being on the same subject as the existing article - see
387:
Chronic Dev announced via twitter... this is a joke??? This subject, if anything, is a mention in somewhere else. I don't find notability worthy of its own wikipedia page.
469:
160:
31:
423:
exploit, which is also discussed in other articles about
Greenpois0n. I believe the amount of detail in these articles is more than trivial/routine coverage.
667:
330:
150:
573:
It distorts the sense of notability by tacking on a bunch of (highcrediblenames).com when the mentions are actually quite trivial in many of the sources.
487:
Updated based on draft. @Cantaloupe2 or anyone else: feel free to revert if you feel this is worse than it used to be. (But it's much better source-wise)
604:
commenting on it during the two weeks when it was an undisputed draft, since I had more freedom to improve the article when it was a talk page draft. :)
672:
126:
345:. These articles aren't ideal, but they include details about the software and its development, not just trivial mentions or simple announcements.
677:
662:
639:
310:
265:
109:
86:
502:
334:
261:
342:
61:
291:
So, which of these sources do you find to be reputable major sources with significant coverage on the product "greenpois0n"
125:
and related topics on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
27:
455:
643:
520:
326:
67:
338:
207:
635:
494:
609:
578:
552:
529:
477:
428:
401:
364:
296:
281:
260:
OK, I believe the draft is in a good state now. Additional sources that I didn't find a way to work in:
251:
322:
390:
ARSTechnica, a discussion about fake tool, that just happens to be released with a name greenpois0n.
229:
This draft covers both the tools described in the existing article and the newer tools described at
49:
20:
269:
230:
215:
488:
214:
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
605:
574:
548:
525:
473:
424:
397:
360:
292:
277:
247:
194:
118:
355:
350:
656:
632:
The link in the description box no longer works and needs to be removed or updated.
396:
These are just collections of trivial coverage and routine product announcements. -
381:
VentureBeat: has nothing to do with greenpois0n directly. Does not even mention it.
318:
314:
547:
comment above. I'd welcome additional opinions though, especially since I'm COI.
359:
write this article; it's based on independent sources that address the subject.
101:
80:
114:
273:
354:
TheNextWeb, The
Register, TUAW, VentureBeat, The Verge, and Wired. And
202:
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
241:. I've now changed my mind on this, since looking more closely, both
242:
647:
613:
582:
556:
533:
510:
481:
432:
405:
368:
300:
285:
255:
465:
393:
PCWorld & Network World: again, routine announcement articles.
458:
by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
443:
176:
122:
43:
15:
309:
Some non-trivial coverage for the sub-topic of
Greenpois0n:
238:
234:
331:
International
Business Times on background information
384:
Some other sources are routine product announcements.
274:
some
Engadget posts on Greenpois0n for 4.1 and 4.2.1
113:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
329:. And for the sub-topic of Greenpois0n Absinthe:
8:
206:] The anchor (Types of jailbreaking tools)
262:Ars Technica post on fake Greenpois0n tools
633:
75:
30:on 18 December 2012 (UTC). The result of
266:Ars Technica post on the SHAtter exploit
77:
47:
628:greenpois0n.com domain no longer works
315:NetworkWorld on background information
311:Ars Technica on background information
270:ReadWriteWeb on Absinthe for iOS 5.0.1
135:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Apple Inc.
7:
107:This article is within the scope of
66:It is of interest to the following
668:Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
339:VentureBeat discussing the release
14:
447:
180:
100:
79:
48:
19:
673:WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
323:PCMag on background information
155:This article has been rated as
138:Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.
26:This article was nominated for
343:PCWorld discussing the release
1:
482:03:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
433:03:20, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
406:20:55, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
369:22:28, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
301:17:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
286:04:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
256:01:58, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
129:and see a list of open tasks.
519:In my opinion it looks like
327:Wired discussing the release
678:Implemented requested edits
663:C-Class Apple Inc. articles
614:12:20, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
583:13:34, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
557:20:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
534:07:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
521:Knowledge (XXG):Bombardment
511:23:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
335:CNet discussing the release
319:more background information
246:suggestions on this draft.
694:
161:project's importance scale
154:
95:
74:
648:19:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
470:nominated for deletion
110:WikiProject Apple Inc.
56:This article is rated
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
231:Absinthe (software)
141:Apple Inc. articles
62:content assessment
650:
638:comment added by
462:
461:
222:
221:
197:in most browsers.
175:
174:
171:
170:
167:
166:
42:
41:
685:
451:
450:
444:
225:Note about draft
216:Reporting errors
208:has been deleted
184:
183:
177:
143:
142:
139:
136:
133:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
693:
692:
688:
687:
686:
684:
683:
682:
653:
652:
630:
448:
227:
218:
200:
199:
198:
181:
140:
137:
134:
131:
130:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
691:
689:
681:
680:
675:
670:
665:
655:
654:
640:108.28.192.152
629:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
539:
538:
537:
536:
514:
513:
460:
459:
452:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
394:
391:
388:
385:
382:
374:
373:
372:
371:
347:
346:
304:
303:
243:the developers
226:
223:
220:
219:
213:
212:
211:
195:case-sensitive
189:
188:
187:
185:
173:
172:
169:
168:
165:
164:
157:Low-importance
153:
147:
146:
144:
127:the discussion
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
690:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
660:
658:
651:
649:
645:
641:
637:
627:
615:
611:
607:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
584:
580:
576:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
558:
554:
550:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
535:
531:
527:
522:
518:
517:
516:
515:
512:
508:
507:
506:
500:
499:
498:
492:
491:
486:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
457:
453:
446:
445:
434:
430:
426:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
407:
403:
399:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
370:
366:
362:
357:
352:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
306:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
257:
253:
249:
244:
240:
236:
232:
224:
217:
209:
205:
204:
203:
196:
192:
186:
179:
178:
162:
158:
152:
149:
148:
145:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
634:— Preceding
631:
504:
503:
496:
495:
489:
463:
456:edit request
259:
228:
201:
193:Anchors are
190:
156:
108:
68:WikiProjects
35:
606:Dreamyshade
575:Cantaloupe2
549:Dreamyshade
526:Cantaloupe2
474:Dreamyshade
425:Dreamyshade
398:Cantaloupe2
361:Dreamyshade
293:Cantaloupe2
278:Dreamyshade
248:Dreamyshade
657:Categories
472:. Thanks!
132:Apple Inc.
87:Apple Inc.
239:this diff
235:this diff
636:unsigned
28:deletion
159:on the
58:C-class
524:such.
272:, and
64:scale.
466:Cydia
454:This
115:Apple
644:talk
610:talk
579:talk
553:talk
530:talk
478:talk
429:talk
402:talk
365:talk
356:WP:N
351:WP:N
317:and
297:talk
282:talk
252:talk
237:and
191:Tip:
36:keep
34:was
151:Low
123:iOS
119:Mac
659::
646:)
612:)
581:)
555:)
532:)
509:)
501:•
490:πr
480:)
431:)
404:)
367:)
341:,
337:,
333:,
325:,
321:,
313:,
299:)
284:)
268:,
264:,
254:)
121:,
117:,
642:(
608:(
577:(
551:(
528:(
505:c
497:t
493:(
476:(
427:(
400:(
363:(
295:(
280:(
250:(
210:.
163:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
