Knowledge

Talk:Guido Imbens/GA1

Source 📝

235: 222: 354: 344: 318: 305: 295: 277: 263: 249: 209: 331: 372: 42: 454:
In one of the real-world applications of the model that would have implications for policymakers, Imben partnered with statistician Donald Rubin and economist Bruce Sacerdote to study the impact of unearned earnings on labor supply. The group studied the implications of policy interventions such as
603:
I found it hard to verify "Winners of $ 80,000 a year for 20 years reduced their working hours somewhat, but winners of $ 15,000 a year for 20 years did not. Among unemployed persons who played the lottery, winners worked more than non-winners in the six years after playing". I spent ten minutes
441:
Imbens graduated with a Candidate's degree (equivalent to a Bachelor's degree) in Econometrics from Erasmus University Rotterdam in 1983. He subsequently obtained an MSc degree with distinction in Economics and Econometrics from the University of Hull in Kingston upon Hull, UK in
170:
Hello I am looking forward to reviewing your article today and working with you. I typically give a week for any corrections to be made and make my final assessment then. I will provide a progress bar and more descriptive feedback to help you make improvements. Kind regards ~ 🦝
656:
The methodologies have been useful for researchers to analyze research problems as diverse as studying the impact of new regulations on economic activity and on new drug effectiveness on patients. ("as diverse as" doesn't feel 100% neutral to
486:
More recently, he (along with Prof. Susan Athey) has been working on using machine learning methods, particularly modifications to random forests called causal forests to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects in causal inference models.
630:
Could you add a second paragraph to the lede? I think the quote from the Nobel Prize is a bit too jargonny and it would be good if it can be supplemented by a plain explanation of what his research entails. (per
498:
to include her, but others may disagree with me. This article is practically a good article already and I'd have directly made these changes, but wanted to hear from you first. Happy editing/reviewing! ~ 🦝
574:
has been inactive of late and unresponsive to queries. The nomination status has been changed to "2nd opinion" in the hopes of finding a new reviewer to take over the review. Thank you to whoever steps up.
494:
I couldn't find any freely licensed photos of Imbens, and the other photos are relevant/freely licensed. Given this his wife is a professor herself and co-authored a paper, I didn't think it was
758:"There is some evidence that for those with zero earnings prior to winning the lottery there is a positive effect of winning a small prize on subsequent labor force participation." (p. 2) 550:
lecture has been released under a CC license, the video from Imbens' camera never occupies more than a tiny portion of the screen, making extracting a good quality still impossible.
593:
First comments: the article looks good on the surface. It's well-written, no copyright problems. I've started checking for text-source integrity, and found two possible errors
455:
Universal Basic Income or other federal and state wage assistance programs on citizens' willingness to participate in the labor force and the eventual impact on labor supply.
80: 491:
there the references should be moved to the end, rather than in the middle of the paragraph (along with adding wiki links to forest trees and machine learning).
525:
raised, even though it has been seven weeks since the review was posted. Are you planning to work on them soon? If not, perhaps the nomination should be closed.
47: 70: 653:). As Stanford may have some motivation to boast about their own researcher, an independent source is preferred for these type of statements: 126: 755:"We find that winning a modest prize ($ 15,000 per year for twenty years) does not affect labor supply or earnings substantially" (p. 2) and 547:
All of the issues have been addressed. I remain unsuccessful in finding a freely licensed image of Imbens of requisite quality. While this
122: 52: 463:"Estimating the Effect of Unearned Income on Labor Earnings, Savings, and Consumption: Evidence from a Survey of Lottery Players" 107: 199: 156: 75: 660:"The paper and the model had significant impact on other research efforts across econometrics, statistics and other fields" 428:, should all be wiki linked. Econmetrics should be wiki linked earlier. Redundant wikilinks in this case may be warranted. 605: 99: 685:: I was wondering if you've seen the rest my review, and when you think you'll have time to further improve the article. 650: 548: 613:
And one prose nitpicking thing: fellow economist Susan Athey since 2002. Athey is a fellow economist -: -->
446:
is missing references. The following paragraph's references would be suitable, e.g. his personal vitae per
720:
Better :). Did you manage to verify that claim of unemployed people working more? It would be great for a
732: 690: 671: 640: 619: 580: 530: 394:
should be He has been a professor of Economics, though I see enough variations on Knowledge of both.
504: 437:
The citations are high quality, but some paragraphs are missing them. For example this paragraph:
409: 176: 150: 387:
The article is nearly in a perfect state. I have a couple of prose/grammar nitpick listed below.
768: 711: 555: 447: 184: 474: 115: 17: 666:
I'm placing the article on hold. Let me know if seven days is enough to tackle those issues.
521:, where does this nomination stand? I don't see that you've addressed any of the issues that 743: 728: 701: 686: 667: 636: 615: 576: 542: 526: 459:
it would benefit from having references that are attached in the following paragraph namely
421: 495: 405: 632: 571: 522: 500: 366: 312: 172: 146: 764: 721: 707: 682: 551: 518: 425: 338: 216: 189: 417: 325: 271: 257: 243: 92: 749: 604:
reading the scientific article, but I couldn't find those exact numbers. Is it a
371: 477: 229: 772: 736: 715: 694: 675: 644: 623: 584: 559: 534: 508: 180: 160: 404:
Given the highly technical/economic focus of this article, concepts like
727:(pet peeve, ignore if you disagree, but can utilise be changed to use?) 462: 566:
Second opinion requested in the hopes of finding reviewer to take over
649:
A lot of the contextualising is done with a non-independent source (
614:
instead of twice the word fellow, you can maybe name her specialty.
752:
published in 1999, rather than 2001. The two relevant quotes are:
590:
I'll take over the review. Should be done by the end of the week.
461:
Imbens, Guido W.; Rubin, Donald B.; Sacerdote, Bruce I. (2001).
365:
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
414:
college education or additional years of education on earnings
763:
I just added the source in addition to changing "utilized"
134: 103: 724:
if it can be verified. A page number would help here.
8: 30: 600:article doesn't include a date of birth 61: 33: 748:— It seems this information came from 7: 194: 392:He has been Professor of Economics 24: 750:a working paper of the same title 370: 352: 342: 329: 316: 303: 293: 275: 261: 247: 233: 220: 207: 401:Imbens was elected as a foreign 330: 450:Similarly with this paragraph 1: 560:22:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 535:04:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC) 467:The American Economic Review 398:Imbens was elected a foreign 353: 343: 317: 304: 294: 288: 276: 262: 248: 234: 221: 208: 186: 509:18:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC) 187: 181:17:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC) 161:17:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC) 795: 676:17:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC) 645:20:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 624:17:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 585:04:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC) 773:13:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC) 737:15:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC) 716:22:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC) 695:19:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC) 706:, how does this look? 606:WP:routine calculation 489: 457: 444: 484: 452: 439: 367:Good Article criteria 339:free or tagged images 651:That Stanford piece 410:Education economics 192:review progress box 482:In this paragraph 369:. Criteria marked 385: 384: 381: 380: 377: 89: 88: 18:Talk:Guido Imbens 786: 747: 705: 546: 481: 422:machine learning 374: 363: 356: 355: 346: 345: 333: 332: 320: 319: 307: 306: 297: 296: 279: 278: 265: 264: 251: 250: 237: 236: 224: 223: 211: 210: 195: 185: 166:Beginning review 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 794: 793: 789: 788: 787: 785: 784: 783: 741: 699: 568: 540: 516: 460: 435: 406:Unearned income 351:pics relevant ( 168: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 792: 790: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 761: 760: 759: 756: 725: 664: 663: 662: 661: 658: 647: 627: 626: 611: 610: 609: 601: 591: 567: 564: 563: 562: 515: 512: 473:(4): 778–794. 434: 431: 430: 429: 402: 395: 383: 382: 379: 378: 376: 375:are unassessed 360: 359: 287: 286: 283: 282: 167: 164: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 791: 774: 770: 766: 762: 757: 754: 753: 751: 745: 740: 739: 738: 734: 730: 726: 723: 719: 718: 717: 713: 709: 703: 698: 697: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 679: 678: 677: 673: 669: 659: 655: 654: 652: 648: 646: 642: 638: 634: 629: 628: 625: 621: 617: 612: 607: 602: 599: 595: 594: 592: 589: 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 573: 570:Regrettably, 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 544: 539: 538: 537: 536: 532: 528: 524: 520: 513: 511: 510: 506: 502: 497: 492: 488: 483: 479: 476: 472: 468: 464: 456: 451: 449: 443: 438: 432: 427: 426:Random forest 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 396: 393: 390: 389: 388: 373: 368: 364: 362: 361: 358: 348: 340: 335: 327: 322: 314: 309: 299: 289: 285: 284: 281: 273: 267: 259: 253: 245: 239: 231: 226: 218: 213: 203: 201: 197: 196: 193: 191: 183: 182: 178: 174: 165: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 665: 597: 569: 517: 514:Status query 493: 490: 485: 470: 466: 458: 453: 445: 440: 436: 418:labor supply 413: 397: 391: 386: 350: 337: 324: 311: 301: 291: 269: 255: 241: 228: 215: 205: 198: 190:Good Article 188: 169: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 744:Femkemilene 702:Femkemilene 577:BlueMoonset 543:BlueMoonset 527:BlueMoonset 448:WP:ACADEMIC 292:broadness ( 104:visual edit 598:Volkskrant 503:(he/him • 230:ref layout 175:(he/him • 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 572:Shushugah 523:Shushugah 501:Shushugah 478:0002-8282 433:Citations 173:Shushugah 147:Shushugah 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 765:Filetime 708:Filetime 683:Filetime 552:Filetime 519:Filetime 496:WP:UNDUE 200:Criteria 157:contribs 76:Criteria 633:WP:MTAU 313:neutral 302:focus ( 206:prose ( 127:history 108:history 94:Article 722:WP:DYK 400:-: --> 326:stable 242:cites 729:Femke 687:Femke 668:Femke 637:Femke 616:Femke 442:1986. 412:(for 272:WP:CV 258:WP:OR 244:WP:RS 136:Watch 16:< 769:talk 733:talk 712:talk 691:talk 672:talk 641:talk 620:talk 596:The 581:talk 556:talk 531:talk 505:talk 475:ISSN 349:6b. 336:6a. 300:3b. 290:3a. 268:2d. 254:2c. 240:2b. 227:2a. 214:1b. 204:1a. 177:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 657:me) 635:). 416:), 323:5. 310:4. 270:no 256:no 217:MoS 771:) 735:) 714:) 693:) 674:) 643:) 622:) 583:) 558:) 533:) 507:) 471:91 469:. 465:. 420:, 408:, 179:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 767:( 746:: 742:@ 731:( 710:( 704:: 700:@ 689:( 681:@ 670:( 639:( 618:( 608:? 579:( 554:( 545:: 541:@ 529:( 480:. 424:/ 357:) 347:) 341:( 334:) 328:( 321:) 315:( 308:) 298:) 280:) 274:( 266:) 260:( 252:) 246:( 238:) 232:( 225:) 219:( 212:) 202:: 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Guido Imbens
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Shushugah
talk
contribs
17:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Shushugah
talk
17:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Good Article
Criteria
MoS
ref layout
WP:RS
WP:OR
WP:CV
neutral

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.