456:
constructive to provide examples of what you consider to be "self-promoting", rather than suggesting the entire article be nuked. This article has been here longer than you have been a
Knowledge (XXG) member. Also, if you are going to object so vehemently to the inclusion of this artist's name on an unauthorized photo wrongly tagged as Creative Commons, please either attribute the photo, or remove this artist's likeness from the wiki electronic dance music page and replace it with something/someone else.
517:
track) mentioned, you missed #9 being nominated alongside
Jamiroquai and Fedde La Grande (both with pages here). #8 substantiates #7 as proof of chart position so that is moot. The references are merely to substantiate claims as to volume of work, not as a claim to notability, and were added only after the page was flagged to do so MANY YEARS AGO. You really should do some actual research prior to attempting to delete things, this page has been here for a while.
483:
doesn't even mention DJ Sharaz. 6. Reference #8 is the ONLY source that can even be considered reputable, but not enough that I personally think it can justify an entire article about the person, much less the picture placed on the EDM page for sole self-promotion, when there are many more notable EDM DJ's with photos from the
Creative Commons that would be more beneficial to the article. 7. The final reference is just a link to the artist's Soundcloud.
354:
292:
268:
204:
186:
155:
84:
21:
694:. While it is possible to determine if two user accounts are really the same person, investigations like that are only done in extraordinary situations. May I suggest that you create an account yourself, because then you will have a talk page and it will be easier to communicate with you. An article's talk page isn't really the right place for that. --
302:
482:
1. Reference #2 is broken. 2. Reference #3 is a CD tracklist, with one remix by the said artist. 3. Reference #4 and #5 mention him in a long list, but doesn't provide with any information that this artist has done anything notable. 4. Reference #6: see reference #3. 5. Reference #7 is an image that
674:
and their earlier vandalism of this page. I'd still like to find out if 1) they are both the same individual and 2) why they didn't reinstate relevant information they gratuitously deleted for no reason whatsoever. I guess we will have to reinstate this ourselves? These two wasted a lot of peoples'
516:
You really don't want to do any research, only nuke the page, don't you? His contributions to that "long list" in 4 & 5 are noted with BMI. Look them up as they are one of the two largest music publishing companies in the world - as a co producer to these songs (including the Fierce Ruling Diva
633:
Consider this another objection to deletion for many of the reasons "unsigned" noted. Rather than repeat what has already been said here. I've followed this artist for nearly 15 years and to say he's not "notable" in this style is pretty bold. I'll contribute more to the deletion discussion, but
455:
This is getting ridiculous. You've provided no suggestions for improvement, only entire removal. The reason your flag keeps getting removed is due to the fact you are not doing much in the way of research. Look up the artist on MTV.com perhaps? Pandora or
Spotify? In the future, it would be more
71:
Artist in question has, without question, impacted the genre he is associated with. Above others in this style, few have IDMA nominations nor remix appearances on
Billboard. Artist may not be notable to researcher but is notable to fans of this
675:
valuable time and I really hope there's some kind of a reporting system within WP for editor behavior. Not a WP expert so any help will be appreciated as I'd really like to pursue this. Thank you.
764:
134:
744:
244:
691:
759:
711:. I would have thanked you earlier but life gets busy occasionally and I haven't been able to get on WP in a while. Duly noted on signing up for an account, thanks again.
615:
139:
749:
220:
739:
734:
94:
122:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
320:
114:
250:
211:
191:
774:
324:
769:
754:
41:
319:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
600:
712:
676:
545:
524:
463:
416:
328:
65:
363:
315:
278:
273:
650:
166:
51:
27:
478:
Suggestions for improvement: find a single, reliable, third party reference of something that this DJ has done notable.
90:
35:
538:
Reference #2 repaired. Please ask next time, or do a simple search, rather than vandalizing the page. Thank you.
123:
431:
Adding these templates is not a form of vandalism. By contrast, removing an AFD template is disruptive and you
172:
604:
638:
541:
520:
459:
412:
154:
716:
680:
549:
528:
467:
420:
59:
646:
564:
487:
219:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
31:
599:
Consider this my objection to deletion. To say this performer is not notable is a little heavy handed.
391:
55:
133:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
642:
560:
I hate to break it to you, but placing a PROD tag is not vandalizing.I do however, suggest you read
83:
671:
409:
Read the wiki guidelines and criteria, yes it does. Undone again. Please stop defacing this page.
698:
623:
440:
399:
137:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
130:
20:
667:
307:
216:
561:
728:
708:
695:
619:
436:
395:
353:
614:
If you have rationale that's not basically your opinion, please bring it to the
291:
267:
297:
203:
185:
327:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
720:
701:
684:
654:
627:
608:
588:
553:
532:
511:
471:
444:
424:
403:
666:
I would like to know who we readers can contact with regard to
148:
129:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
106:
78:
15:
352:
692:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
690:
Hi. The best place for your query would probably be
215:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
249:This article has not yet received a rating on the
765:Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
8:
745:Unknown-importance electronic music articles
662:Defacement and contact information, please..
229:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Electronic music
47:Can't find anything that makes him notable.
262:
180:
152:
760:Stub-Class biography (musicians) articles
264:
182:
44:) on 29 December 2013 with the comment:
386:Why does this keep getting deleted? ~
750:WikiProject Electronic music articles
486:And finally, you can't remove flags.
337:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
232:Template:WikiProject Electronic music
7:
740:Stub-Class electronic music articles
634:consider my vote a very strong NO.
313:This article is within the scope of
209:This article is within the scope of
735:Biography articles of living people
171:It is of interest to the following
93:on 11 January 2014. The result of
14:
392:notability criteria for musicians
68:) on 2013-12-29 with the comment:
300:
290:
266:
202:
184:
153:
112:This article must adhere to the
82:
19:
89:This article was nominated for
775:WikiProject Biography articles
580:
574:
565:
503:
497:
488:
340:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
770:Musicians work group articles
755:Stub-Class biography articles
573:
570:
496:
493:
472:16:58, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
361:This article is supported by
223:and see a list of open tasks.
115:biographies of living persons
702:20:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
685:20:03, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
655:14:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
628:02:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
609:01:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
445:22:04, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
425:14:44, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
404:06:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
325:contribute to the discussion
212:WikiProject Electronic music
589:22:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
554:20:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
533:20:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
512:08:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
127:must be removed immediately
791:
251:project's importance scale
721:04:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
360:
285:
248:
235:electronic music articles
197:
179:
616:the deletion discussion
357:
161:This article is rated
595:Objection to Deletion
390:It does not meet the
364:WikiProject Musicians
356:
316:WikiProject Biography
165:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
28:proposed for deletion
358:
343:biography articles
167:content assessment
658:
641:comment added by
544:comment added by
523:comment added by
462:comment added by
415:comment added by
379:
378:
375:
374:
371:
370:
261:
260:
257:
256:
147:
146:
105:
104:
77:
76:
73:
48:
782:
657:
635:
586:
584:
578:
572:
569:
556:
535:
509:
507:
501:
495:
492:
474:
451:RedMarkViolinist
427:
345:
344:
341:
338:
335:
321:join the project
310:
308:Biography portal
305:
304:
303:
294:
287:
286:
281:
270:
263:
237:
236:
233:
230:
227:
226:Electronic music
217:Electronic music
206:
199:
198:
192:Electronic music
188:
181:
164:
158:
157:
149:
135:this noticeboard
107:
86:
79:
70:
46:
32:Redmarkviolinist
23:
16:
790:
789:
785:
784:
783:
781:
780:
779:
725:
724:
664:
636:
597:
539:
518:
457:
453:
410:
384:
342:
339:
336:
333:
332:
306:
301:
299:
276:
234:
231:
228:
225:
224:
162:
12:
11:
5:
788:
786:
778:
777:
772:
767:
762:
757:
752:
747:
742:
737:
727:
726:
705:
704:
663:
660:
631:
630:
596:
593:
592:
591:
480:
479:
452:
449:
448:
447:
407:
406:
383:
380:
377:
376:
373:
372:
369:
368:
359:
349:
348:
346:
312:
311:
295:
283:
282:
271:
259:
258:
255:
254:
247:
241:
240:
238:
221:the discussion
207:
195:
194:
189:
177:
176:
170:
159:
145:
144:
140:this help page
124:poorly sourced
110:
103:
102:
95:the discussion
87:
75:
74:
69:
49:
45:
26:This page was
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
787:
776:
773:
771:
768:
766:
763:
761:
758:
756:
753:
751:
748:
746:
743:
741:
738:
736:
733:
732:
730:
723:
722:
718:
714:
710:
703:
700:
697:
693:
689:
688:
687:
686:
682:
678:
673:
672:RedMarkViolin
669:
661:
659:
656:
652:
648:
644:
640:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
601:67.190.202.71
594:
590:
587:
583:
577:
568:
562:
559:
558:
557:
555:
551:
547:
543:
536:
534:
530:
526:
522:
514:
513:
510:
506:
500:
491:
484:
477:
476:
475:
473:
469:
465:
461:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
387:
381:
366:
365:
355:
351:
350:
347:
330:
329:documentation
326:
322:
318:
317:
309:
298:
296:
293:
289:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
269:
265:
252:
246:
243:
242:
239:
222:
218:
214:
213:
208:
205:
201:
200:
196:
193:
190:
187:
183:
178:
174:
168:
160:
156:
151:
150:
142:
141:
136:
132:
128:
125:
121:
117:
116:
111:
109:
108:
100:
96:
92:
88:
85:
81:
80:
67:
64:
61:
57:
53:
43:
40:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
713:108.9.22.244
706:
677:108.9.22.244
665:
637:— Preceding
632:
598:
581:
575:
566:
546:108.9.22.244
540:— Preceding
537:
525:108.9.22.244
519:— Preceding
515:
504:
498:
489:
485:
481:
464:108.9.22.244
458:— Preceding
454:
432:
417:108.9.22.244
411:— Preceding
408:
385:
362:
314:
210:
173:WikiProjects
138:
126:
119:
113:
99:no consensus
98:
62:
56:108.9.22.244
38:
729:Categories
707:Thank you
163:Stub-class
643:Sotoma665
435:do that.
334:Biography
279:Musicians
274:Biography
131:libellous
52:contested
709:RoySmith
696:RoySmith
668:RadioDef
651:contribs
639:unsigned
620:Radiodef
585:iolinist
542:unsigned
521:unsigned
508:iolinist
460:unsigned
437:Radiodef
413:unsigned
396:Radiodef
382:Untitled
91:deletion
66:contribs
42:contribs
433:can not
50:It was
699:(talk)
169:scale.
72:style.
717:talk
681:talk
670:and
647:talk
624:talk
605:talk
550:talk
529:talk
468:talk
441:talk
421:talk
400:talk
323:and
97:was
60:talk
36:talk
579:ark
502:ark
245:???
120:BLP
54:by
30:by
731::
719:)
683:)
653:)
649:•
626:)
618:.
607:)
571:ed
563:.
552:)
531:)
494:ed
470:)
443:)
423:)
402:)
394:.
277::
715:(
679:(
645:(
622:(
603:(
582:V
576:M
567:Ṝ
548:(
527:(
505:V
499:M
490:Ṝ
466:(
439:(
419:(
398:(
367:.
331:.
253:.
175::
143:.
118:(
101:.
63:·
58:(
39:·
34:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
