84:
74:
53:
176:
158:
186:
22:
299:
I think the text of the distinction, which claims that "at any given point more cells have recently divided than are about to divide," is incorrect. In an exponentially growing population, the rate of addition of new individuals is constantly increasing. Therefore, it should always be the case that
283:
This is clearly a different use of "generation time" than the one I'm familliar with from demography and population biology. They are not equivalent: generation time in population biology is the average age of parents, whereas doubling time refers to growth of the population. Generation time needs
381:
The introduction refers to the "natural logarithm of 2", while the examination section shows "log(2). which is the nomenclature for the common logarithm of 2. Nomenclature for natural logarithm of two is ln(2). Or at least it was when I was in school, which I'll admit was some years ago.
268:, but doubling time then makes the distinction between the two at the bottom of the page? Surely they deserve to be distinguished better than that, move to separate the two?... Or perhaps, if, as it says, they are largely interchangeable, move to properly distinguished at the top
140:
465:
232:
455:
238:
130:
470:
325:
n(t) = the number of objects at time t d = doubling period (time it takes for object to double in number) c= initial number of objects t = time "
106:
450:
428:
362:
208:
460:
97:
58:
199:
163:
344:
191:
33:
408:
432:
366:
405:
289:
273:
418:
39:
305:
83:
358:
332:
21:
387:
207:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
105:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
340:
285:
89:
73:
52:
269:
414:
261:
383:
444:
336:
319:
Good Wiki-Math-Text Editor, Please clarify and clean up (cases, formatting, style):
265:
301:
175:
157:
102:
409:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/health/piero-anversa-fraud-retractions.html
181:
79:
204:
406:
https://www.statnews.com/2018/10/14/harvard-brigham-retractions-stem-cell/
185:
436:
422:
391:
370:
348:
309:
293:
277:
15:
300:
more cells are about to divide than have recently divided.
203:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
237:This article has not yet received a rating on the
322:"Simple doubling time formula N(t) = C(2)^t/d
8:
377:Natural logarithm of 2 is ln(2), not log(2)
152:
47:
260:Does anyone find it slightly stupid that
413:was placed in article instead of here--
154:
49:
19:
466:Unknown-importance Economics articles
7:
197:This article is within the scope of
95:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
456:Low-priority mathematics articles
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics
315:Style Cleanup - Doubling formula
184:
174:
156:
118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics
82:
72:
51:
20:
217:Knowledge:WikiProject Economics
135:This article has been rated as
471:WikiProject Economics articles
401:Reference 6 is controversial.
220:Template:WikiProject Economics
1:
392:04:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
211:and see a list of open tasks.
192:Business and economics portal
109:and see a list of open tasks.
451:C-Class mathematics articles
294:16:34, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
487:
461:C-Class Economics articles
437:18:38, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
371:18:23, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
278:18:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
239:project's importance scale
310:21:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
236:
169:
134:
67:
46:
423:14:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
349:16:17, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
141:project's priority scale
98:WikiProject Mathematics
28:This article is rated
200:WikiProject Economics
121:mathematics articles
223:Economics articles
90:Mathematics portal
34:content assessment
361:comment added by
352:
335:comment added by
253:
252:
249:
248:
245:
244:
151:
150:
147:
146:
478:
373:
351:
329:
225:
224:
221:
218:
215:
194:
189:
188:
178:
171:
170:
160:
153:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
486:
485:
481:
480:
479:
477:
476:
475:
441:
440:
429:203.101.190.175
399:
379:
356:
355:play- playing
330:
317:
262:generation time
258:
222:
219:
216:
213:
212:
190:
183:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
88:
81:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
484:
482:
474:
473:
468:
463:
458:
453:
443:
442:
398:
395:
378:
375:
363:41.234.109.193
328:Thanks. ````
316:
313:
297:
296:
257:
254:
251:
250:
247:
246:
243:
242:
235:
229:
228:
226:
209:the discussion
196:
195:
179:
167:
166:
161:
149:
148:
145:
144:
133:
127:
126:
124:
107:the discussion
94:
93:
77:
65:
64:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
483:
472:
469:
467:
464:
462:
459:
457:
454:
452:
449:
448:
446:
439:
438:
434:
430:
425:
424:
420:
416:
411:
410:
407:
402:
396:
394:
393:
389:
385:
376:
374:
372:
368:
364:
360:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
326:
323:
320:
314:
312:
311:
307:
303:
295:
291:
287:
286:Trashbird1240
284:its own page.
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:doubling time
264:redirects to
263:
255:
240:
234:
231:
230:
227:
210:
206:
202:
201:
193:
187:
182:
180:
177:
173:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
427:03409181207
426:
412:
403:
400:
380:
354:
327:
324:
321:
318:
298:
270:Geno-Supremo
259:
198:
137:Low-priority
136:
96:
62:Low‑priority
40:WikiProjects
415:Ozzie10aaaa
357:—Preceding
331:—Preceding
256:Distinction
112:Mathematics
103:mathematics
59:Mathematics
445:Categories
384:Catrachos
214:Economics
205:Economics
164:Economics
359:unsigned
345:contribs
337:HalFonts
333:unsigned
302:Nico KG
139:on the
30:C-class
404:See:-
36:scale.
433:talk
419:talk
397:note
388:talk
367:talk
341:talk
306:talk
290:talk
274:talk
233:???
131:Low
447::
435:)
421:)
390:)
382:--
369:)
347:)
343:•
308:)
292:)
276:)
431:(
417:(
386:(
365:(
339:(
304:(
288:(
272:(
241:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
