1199:). Instead, you use them to draw conclusions and frame facts in a biased way that is not actually supported by those sources. For example, framing German as a former police officer, when he is also a lawyer and the author of a legal textbook on money laundering. Your text also says that German was unable to answer questions about the calculation of the $ 100 million valuation at the press conference for the publication of his report and cites that to his report, which would obviously not be a suitable source for either the later press conference or to prove a negative about itself. Secondary sources are required.The paragraph on the cheques is also suspect. The Cullen Commission also found (pg. 559) that the EY audit results didn't contradict the German report, and the report itself clearly notes that the period in question was not the same as the study period of the German report and did not "look at every casino cheque issued". Though practically the latter probably doesn't make a difference because it was a value cutoff, but this is still exaggerated in the thoroughness of the EY report, which doesn't mention Eby at all. The Cullen Report section on alleged corruption and Eby's role in that makes no mention of "Eby's aspersons" (pg. 767-770). Again, some or all of what is in the text may be true, but it has to be backed by reliable sources. Also, it is borderline improper to cite the Cullen Report directly without a pinpoint to a specific page, given that it is 1831 pages.The Sinophobia stuff is the best sourced, though still not great. Eby is barely mentioned in the CBC article, but The Volcano article is very in-depth and compelling and could be a RS, but without further knowledge of their editorial record, I can't say for sure. It's much easier to find established stuff for this which is also more recent and captures the apology Eby made to the Cullen Commission (e.g.
1222:
much more comprehensive statute than the limited provisions found in the
Criminal Code. The PCMLTFA deals specifically and exclusively with money laundering and ML controls. This is an area in which German had no expertise and is far beyond the Criminal Code sections on which he has written. Therefore it is you who have frame German as "police officer, lawyer, expert", in a way that is misleading and biased. Thus if you feel German should be identified as a lawyer and author you should make that edit (not delete the entire section), and at the same time, to be accurate and provide the proper context you profess to aspire to, you will need to add that he is a lawyer and author with no expertise or specific knowledge of the PCMLTFA. At the same time you will need to point out that German, as a police officer, never worked in matters falling under the PCMLTFA either (read the transcript of testimony at the Inquiry). This lack of expertise is reflected in the quality and appropriateness of German's recommendations, and summarized nicely by the evidence given at the Commission of Inquiry by Deputy Solicitor General Mark Seiben (now deputy to the Premier) and then Deputy to the Premier Lori Wannamaker where they testified that German's report lacked completely the professional standards normally required of expert reports and further, they opined the findings and recommendations throughout the report lacked an evidentiary basis. (Both transcripts are available here:
1226:) Given the foregoing one can agree with your criticism that HFR YVR did not provide the full context on German, but in the opposite way you suggest. HFR YVR could have provided greater context which would demonstrate that German's appointment is curious given his lack of experience and expertise on the PCMLTFA. In that regard HFR YVR was being more than fair - contrary to unsubstantiated claims of bias. Additionally, HFR YVR could have also pointed to the media stories reporting that German was granted a highly sought afer Queen's Counsel designation (now King's Counsel) by Eby's office IN THE MIDDLE OF CONDUCTING his reportedly independent review.
1202:). The apology should probably be in the article, but the current writeup is not it. The paragraph on the cost of the Cullen Commission and lack of charges is sourced to an opinion column. There is also no statute of limitations in Canada and the Cullen Report was released less than a year ago, so even if there were reliable sources, we shouldn't be saying this with such a degree of certainty. The remainder of the sources are to radio shows, which while potentially useful, are totally unverifiable without links and given the state of your content, would be required. ----
1115:
any of the cites are not accurate or do not support the statements made, you need to explain, with evidence, before editing out others contributions. I note further that you simply delete the entire sections which is not in keeping with fact based, evidence supported editing, and is indicative of your efforts to simply remove anything not flattering to the subject of the wiki. Indiscriminately deleting entire sections, where virtually every sentence is supported by an authoritative cite, and without challenging those cites with evidence, is simply vandalism.
1251:, because you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding here. "Original research" doesn't just mean conducting an interview with the subject or whatever, it also refers to making analysis and interpretations of a primary source. So it doesn't matter if your criticism of German is founded or not, or if you back back up your criticism of Eby by pointing to a contradiction in a testimony or whatever — it's not Knowledge's place to be doing this to begin with. Knowledge reflects what the secondary sources are saying. —
611:
509:
802:
1153:
court cases, references to statutes, and transcripts of testimony from the
Parliament of Canada. Kawnhr makes no effort to refute or otherwise prove the cites are inaccurate or do not support the statements made. Thus the repeated deletion of entire sections that appear to be perceived by Kawnhr as unfavorable to the subject of the wiki is inconsistent with fact based editing and these actions are more consistent with vandalism.
781:
697:
575:
676:
428:
707:
275:
366:
342:
587:
499:
648:
460:
1195:
making a connection to Eby's past position. As for the money laundering, most of the sources are either from opinion columns, which are not great as reliable sources, or your own assessment of various reports, submissions to the Cullen commission, and
Parliamentary testimony. For biographies of living people such as Eby, such material typically must be used to supplement secondary sources (
203:
311:
1230:
material in these two sections not favorable to the subject yet make no mention of the exact same quality of cites used in other sections which are favorable to the subject. I note also you do not make corrections or edits based on evidence but rather simply delete the entire sections. This is not in keeping with policy or balanced and fact based editing.
376:
920:
Kawnhr is removing factual entries and edits which may appear unflattering to Eby. The edits Kawnhr is removing are fully supported with cites from independent third parties sources. These efforts appear to be intended to slant the wiki which results in a page that is misleading and not an accurate
1221:
German's legal text is, and has always been, on Part XII of the
Criminal Code dealing with proceeds of crime provisions in that statute. The subject matter of the review he was engaged to conduct was the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act - a completely different and
1293:
I don't see any opinion pieces from a quick skim of the sources in the ICBC section now, so they might've been removed. In any case that's not relevant to whether the material I removed should have been kept, if you have any specific concerns about the article going beyond what the sources say, you
1152:
Kawnhr continues to remove entire sections where he disagrees with the content. He suggests the content is not in keeping with guidelines, but provides no specific examples - he just deletes the entire section. Each section deleted is supported by extensive independent third party cites, including
1217:
Your selective critique is interesting. Note that opinion columns were used extensively throughout the ICBC section as cites - without objection or criticism, yet this is your primary basis of complaint on ML. Additionally the ICBC section contained a number of statements that were pure political
1194:
Neither the SCC judgement nor the working paper mention Eby, while the opinion column isn't a great source as an RS and is actually praising Eby. So while the new civil forfeiture provisions should be mentioned, and the new BCCLA et al. criticism mentioned, without better sourcing, we shouldn't be
1114:
The "input" from another you are accepting is a simple expression of opinion that the "language is biased" without any reference to which language and without anything cited in support. To the contrary, each statement in the section is supported by an independent third party cite - if you believe
971:
The lack of consonance between Eby’s rhetoric on money laundering and Cullen’s findings, the fact that there has not been a single individual charged, prosecuted, or convicted of a money laundering offence involving the real estate or casino sectors despite claims of overwhelming evidence of such
1168:
HFR YVR, I gave a clear explanation of what I disagree with and why in the section above, citing
Knowledge policy and offering three specific examples of offending text. Another editor agreed, and a second editor, just recently, stepped forward with similar concerns. Don't try to spin this as me
1229:
I have read the two sections to which you object in their entirety and have looked at each cite. The sections are reasonable characterizations of statements of fact supported by fairly extensive cites of a quality equal to other topics covered on the page. As noted you only raise objections to
955:
Eby, however, tends to omit mentioning his prior opposition to civil forfeiture laws and the fact the entire regime would not exist but for his political opponents. All of which has led some citizens to observe that Eby’s stance on money laundering seems to vacillate to align with his perceived
1298:
to base it on a testimony of a transcript. Please provide a secondary source that makes the claim such as a newspaper article, academic article, published book, or even a citation to the final conclusion of the Cullen
Commission, which processed all of the original testimony. --
950:. Because far from adding content that is "fully supported with cites from independent third parties sources", you regularly went off into your own interpretations that are not remotely neutral. I'll refresh your memory by quoting a few (entirely uncited) passages you added:
880:
Eby's made a couple of policy announcements in the last couple days that, while I don't think are especially notable right now, could be helpful in future if we start breaking up the "Premier of
British Columbia" section by issue. So I'll drop them here for reference:
980:
I continue to disagree with your edit but I will not revert for the time being, as we are essentially having a content dispute and I don't want to get into an edit war. Since individual
Canadian politics pages generally don't get much traffic, I will raise this on
1131:
You baldly state "Language seems very biased..." Which language. Each statement is fully supported by an independent third party cite. You have offered no support or evidence for this assertion. At this stage it is simply and opinion without foundation.
1084:
Terms used in the money laundering sections don't discuss what happened so much as make claims that certain policies were incorrect. Language seems very biased and not appropriate for wiki. Sorry I don't have the ability to research and correct the article.
1032:
The EY findings are based on demonstrable and immutable facts, which are available for independent verification, and sit in direct contradiction to Eby’s testimony before
Parliament. There is no indication Eby has done anything to correct the
963:
The EY findings are based on demonstrable and immutable facts, which are available for independent verification, and sit in direct contradiction to Eby’s testimony before
Parliament. There is no indication Eby has done anything to correct the
1408:
1265:
This goes triple when the original research regards biographies of living persons. Original research about living persons is supposed to be removed immediately until a reliable source can be found to also state such assertions. —
942:; I edit widely and have worked on pages for parties and politicians of all stripes. I reverted your edit because — and I will admit I should have put this in the edit summary — I saw it as outside Knowledge's policy on
1403:
1348:
972:
offences, and the racial overtones have led some to conclude the entire exercise was a costly exercise in political adventurism motivated by a desire to create political advantage through damage to the opposition.
442:
1054:
If you go the cite for the EY findings and the cite which points directly to Eby's testimony before parliament it is clear this testimony is directly contradicted by the EY audit. How is this any way editorial?
1036:
If you go the cite for the EY findings and the cite which points directly to Eby's testimony before parliament it is clear this testimony is directly contradicted by the EY audit. How is this any way editorial?
153:
657:
482:
1100:
We discussed this a little above, but I was reluctant to do anything with only one other editor's input. But now with yours, I'll take the initiative to restore an earlier version of the section. —
1343:
1086:
1438:
856:
846:
1443:
437:
352:
822:
1433:
1353:
1218:
advocacy in favor of the NDP, yet drew no criticism. Your assessment appears to be only focused on material that some may perceive as unfavorable to the subject of the page.
255:
194:
1388:
285:
who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy.
809:
786:
1368:
555:
147:
1328:
260:
1200:
243:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1398:
1383:
638:
79:
1056:
Because it's Knowledge policy to reflect what secondary sources are saying, not to make our own interpretations and analysis of the source. Please read
1423:
763:
753:
1378:
1363:
1358:
565:
394:
235:
1428:
921:
representation of independently verifiable facts. Others experiencing these types of edits by Kawnhr are encouraged to report the vandalism.
620:
474:
1413:
85:
398:
1393:
1338:
1040:
729:
1418:
1305:
1294:
are free to do that. As for the rest of your post, while some it might be potentially concerning and worthy of mention if true, it is
1208:
1183:
The stuff on civil forfeiture would be interesting to have in the article to note the shift in position, but it needs to be backed by
1090:
402:
1373:
531:
44:
393:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
936:
I really don't appreciate these aspersions (though I'm tickled I count as a publisher). I am not trying to "slant the wiki" or
633:
478:
389:
347:
288:
99:
30:
1039:
Your edits, on the other hand, appear to focus on removing any material that does not paint the subject in a favorable light.
1295:
1282:
999:
Fully agree with Kawnhr's initial revert... there is tonnes of material in the new version of that passage (which also fails
720:
681:
104:
20:
1169:
acting unilaterally or maliciously. You're the one who has, so far, refused to engage in anything other than aspersions. —
895:
600:
470:
74:
1015:
and excising all recent additions by HFR YVR unless they can be reliably sourced and verified and written from a NPOV. —
522:
465:
322:
168:
1333:
885:
135:
65:
202:
185:
213:
190:
890:
1044:
1235:
244:
109:
1192:
129:
1020:
328:
1231:
125:
1196:
1191:
of the sources. Even RSs that mention the past BCCLA connection unfortunately do not delve into this
254:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
310:
1188:
296:
161:
55:
1154:
1133:
1116:
922:
821:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
728:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
530:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1277:
1244:
Welcome to Knowledge! Wow, we sure are seeing a lot of new editors with an interest in this page.
292:
258:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
218:
175:
70:
977:
You're really going to tell me you don't think any of that counts as — to use your word — slant?
610:
1300:
1203:
1158:
1137:
1120:
926:
51:
1256:
1174:
1105:
1065:
1016:
990:
982:
906:
381:
215:
712:
251:
1008:
943:
592:
141:
891:
Premier proposes giving cities building targets in bid to tackle B.C.'s housing crisis
706:
696:
675:
427:
1322:
1272:
818:
514:
1248:
1184:
1057:
1004:
947:
801:
780:
574:
274:
1247:
As with the editors before you, I urge you to read and familiarize yourself with
1252:
1170:
1101:
1061:
986:
902:
365:
341:
702:
582:
504:
498:
459:
371:
282:
24:
647:
1029:
The edits are entirely neutral and fact based. You question this section:
1223:
1000:
814:
725:
527:
217:
1409:
Mid-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
916:
Publisher Kawnhr - Misleading Edits and Removal of Factual Material
401:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
896:
B.C. government announces new minister to focus solely on housing
1309:
1286:
1260:
1239:
1212:
1178:
1162:
1141:
1124:
1109:
1094:
1069:
1048:
1024:
994:
930:
910:
304:
269:
250:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
227:
219:
15:
985:
to get additional input so we can get a consensus. Cheers. —
1404:
B-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
646:
609:
573:
426:
1349:
Low-importance biography (politics and government) articles
1148:
Kawnhr - Misleading Edits and Removal of Factual Material
1012:
938:
658:
WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada
287:
For that reason, this article is at increased risk of
160:
1187:
that actually make this point, and not just your own
1344:
B-Class biography (politics and government) articles
813:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
724:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
526:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1439:Low-importance Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
831:Knowledge:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1444:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
834:Template:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism
969:
961:
953:
174:
8:
886:B.C. Premier outlines new public safety plan
1434:B-Class Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
1354:Politics and government work group articles
775:
670:
454:
336:
1389:Mid-importance British Columbia articles
777:
672:
456:
338:
308:
1369:Mid-importance Canada-related articles
1224:https://cullencommission.ca/witnesses/
1087:2605:8D80:441:6F2D:1504:7FFA:590F:C81F
1053:
810:WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism
438:the politics and government work group
7:
807:This article is within the scope of
718:This article is within the scope of
520:This article is within the scope of
387:This article is within the scope of
1329:Biography articles of living people
837:Veganism and Vegetarianism articles
327:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
14:
1399:Low-importance Vancouver articles
1384:B-Class British Columbia articles
1424:Low-importance politics articles
1080:NPOV in Money Laundering section
800:
779:
705:
695:
674:
585:
507:
497:
458:
374:
364:
340:
309:
273:
233:This article must adhere to the
201:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1379:Mid-importance Ontario articles
1364:B-Class Canada-related articles
851:This article has been rated as
758:This article has been rated as
560:This article has been rated as
411:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
1359:WikiProject Biography articles
956:political fortunes of the day.
738:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
414:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1429:WikiProject Politics articles
911:22:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
825:and see a list of open tasks.
741:Template:WikiProject Politics
732:and see a list of open tasks.
655:This article is supported by
631:This article is supported by
618:This article is supported by
598:This article is supported by
534:and see a list of open tasks.
435:This article is supported by
236:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
1414:All WikiProject Canada pages
939:"create a promotional entry"
621:WikiProject British Columbia
540:Knowledge:WikiProject Canada
399:contribute to the discussion
1268:Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung
543:Template:WikiProject Canada
248:must be removed immediately
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1460:
1394:B-Class Vancouver articles
1339:B-Class biography articles
1310:18:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
1287:15:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
1261:16:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
1240:22:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
857:project's importance scale
828:Veganism and Vegetarianism
787:Veganism and Vegetarianism
764:project's importance scale
566:project's importance scale
1419:B-Class politics articles
1213:09:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
1179:17:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1163:16:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1142:16:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1125:16:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1110:21:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
1095:16:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
1070:17:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1049:16:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
1025:23:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
995:21:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
931:19:57, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
850:
795:
757:
690:
654:
630:
617:
581:
559:
492:
434:
359:
335:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1374:B-Class Ontario articles
876:Possible refs for future
1011:. Support restoring to
546:Canada-related articles
353:Politics and Government
974:
966:
958:
651:
614:
578:
431:
317:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1003:) that 100% violates
650:
634:WikiProject Vancouver
613:
577:
430:
390:WikiProject Biography
281:This page is about a
195:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
721:WikiProject Politics
105:No original research
601:WikiProject Ontario
291:editing, talk-page
1334:Active politicians
652:
615:
579:
523:WikiProject Canada
432:
417:biography articles
323:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1296:original research
871:
870:
867:
866:
863:
862:
774:
773:
770:
769:
744:politics articles
669:
668:
665:
664:
453:
452:
449:
448:
303:
302:
268:
267:
226:
225:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1451:
1185:reliable sources
941:
839:
838:
835:
832:
829:
804:
797:
796:
791:
783:
776:
746:
745:
742:
739:
736:
715:
710:
709:
699:
692:
691:
686:
678:
671:
595:
590:
589:
588:
548:
547:
544:
541:
538:
517:
512:
511:
510:
501:
494:
493:
488:
485:
475:British Columbia
462:
455:
419:
418:
415:
412:
409:
395:join the project
384:
382:Biography portal
379:
378:
377:
368:
361:
360:
355:
344:
337:
320:
314:
313:
305:
277:
270:
256:this noticeboard
228:
220:
206:
205:
196:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1459:
1458:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1319:
1318:
1308:
1211:
1150:
1082:
937:
918:
878:
836:
833:
830:
827:
826:
789:
743:
740:
737:
734:
733:
713:Politics portal
711:
704:
684:
591:
586:
584:
545:
542:
539:
536:
535:
513:
508:
506:
486:
468:
416:
413:
410:
407:
406:
380:
375:
373:
350:
321:on Knowledge's
318:
222:
221:
216:
193:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1457:
1455:
1447:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1426:
1421:
1416:
1411:
1406:
1401:
1396:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1376:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1304:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1245:
1227:
1219:
1207:
1181:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1037:
1034:
1030:
1027:
978:
975:
967:
959:
951:
917:
914:
899:
898:
893:
888:
877:
874:
869:
868:
865:
864:
861:
860:
853:Low-importance
849:
843:
842:
840:
823:the discussion
805:
793:
792:
790:Low‑importance
784:
772:
771:
768:
767:
760:Low-importance
756:
750:
749:
747:
730:the discussion
717:
716:
700:
688:
687:
685:Low‑importance
679:
667:
666:
663:
662:
653:
643:
642:
639:Low-importance
629:
626:
625:
616:
606:
605:
597:
596:
593:Ontario portal
580:
570:
569:
562:Mid-importance
558:
552:
551:
549:
532:the discussion
519:
518:
502:
490:
489:
487:Mid‑importance
463:
451:
450:
447:
446:
443:Low-importance
433:
423:
422:
420:
386:
385:
369:
357:
356:
345:
333:
332:
326:
315:
301:
300:
278:
266:
265:
261:this help page
245:poorly sourced
231:
224:
223:
214:
212:
211:
208:
207:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1456:
1445:
1442:
1440:
1437:
1435:
1432:
1430:
1427:
1425:
1422:
1420:
1417:
1415:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1387:
1385:
1382:
1380:
1377:
1375:
1372:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1326:
1324:
1311:
1307:
1306:contributions
1302:
1297:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1274:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1225:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1209:contributions
1205:
1201:
1198:
1197:WP:BLPPRIMARY
1193:
1190:
1186:
1182:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1167:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1079:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1046:
1042:
1041:24.85.120.160
1038:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
979:
976:
973:
968:
965:
960:
957:
952:
949:
945:
940:
935:
934:
933:
932:
928:
924:
915:
913:
912:
908:
904:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
883:
882:
875:
873:
858:
854:
848:
845:
844:
841:
824:
820:
819:vegetarianism
816:
812:
811:
806:
803:
799:
798:
794:
788:
785:
782:
778:
765:
761:
755:
752:
751:
748:
731:
727:
723:
722:
714:
708:
703:
701:
698:
694:
693:
689:
683:
680:
677:
673:
660:
659:
649:
645:
644:
640:
637:(assessed as
636:
635:
628:
627:
623:
622:
612:
608:
607:
603:
602:
594:
583:
576:
572:
571:
567:
563:
557:
554:
553:
550:
533:
529:
525:
524:
516:
515:Canada portal
505:
503:
500:
496:
495:
491:
484:
480:
476:
472:
467:
464:
461:
457:
444:
441:(assessed as
440:
439:
429:
425:
424:
421:
404:
403:documentation
400:
396:
392:
391:
383:
372:
370:
367:
363:
362:
358:
354:
349:
346:
343:
339:
334:
330:
324:
316:
312:
307:
306:
298:
295:, and simple
294:
290:
286:
284:
279:
276:
272:
271:
263:
262:
257:
253:
249:
246:
242:
238:
237:
232:
230:
229:
210:
209:
204:
200:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1301:Patar knight
1276:
1271:
1267:
1232:WilliamR2021
1204:Patar knight
1189:WP:SYNTHESIS
1151:
1083:
1013:this version
970:
962:
954:
919:
900:
879:
872:
852:
808:
759:
719:
656:
632:
619:
599:
561:
521:
436:
388:
329:WikiProjects
280:
259:
247:
240:
234:
198:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1017:Joeyconnick
148:free images
31:not a forum
1323:Categories
283:politician
983:WP:CANADA
479:Vancouver
408:Biography
348:Biography
297:vandalism
252:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
25:David Eby
21:talk page
1001:MOS:HEAD
815:veganism
735:Politics
726:politics
682:Politics
483:Politics
293:trolling
199:180 days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1155:HFR YVR
1134:HFR YVR
1117:HFR YVR
1033:record.
1009:WP:NPOV
964:record.
944:WP:NPOV
923:HFR YVR
855:on the
762:on the
564:on the
471:Ontario
319:B-class
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1253:Kawnhr
1171:Kawnhr
1102:Kawnhr
1062:Kawnhr
987:Kawnhr
903:Kawnhr
537:Canada
528:Canada
466:Canada
325:scale.
289:biased
126:Google
1273:mello
1249:WP:OR
1058:WP:OR
1005:WP:OR
948:WP:OR
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1257:talk
1236:talk
1175:talk
1159:talk
1138:talk
1121:talk
1106:talk
1091:talk
1066:talk
1060:. —
1045:talk
1021:talk
1007:and
991:talk
946:and
927:talk
907:talk
817:and
397:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1303:- /
1278:hi!
1206:- /
847:Low
754:Low
556:Mid
241:BLP
176:TWL
1325::
1285:)
1283:投稿
1270:,
1259:)
1238:)
1177:)
1161:)
1140:)
1123:)
1108:)
1093:)
1068:)
1047:)
1023:)
993:)
929:)
909:)
901:—
641:).
481:/
477:/
473:/
469::
445:).
351::
197::
156:)
54:;
1281:(
1255:(
1234:(
1173:(
1157:(
1136:(
1119:(
1104:(
1089:(
1064:(
1043:(
1019:(
989:(
925:(
905:(
859:.
766:.
661:.
624:.
604:.
568:.
405:.
331::
299:.
264:.
239:(
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
