1122:
stretched waaayyy out of proportion. It's completely irresponsible. There's not a shred of evidence other than the organization's own very dubious claims. As someone already said, all we can guess is that someone sent out flyers to churches and asked those churches to do something that they already do (pray) at the time that they already would be doing that(church services), and only for a couple of times since 2004. Not one single source is from a 3rd party or even a reputable, well-known news organization. Sloppy research. Only sources given are reports from outfits that are part of the supposed event-- if we take away the info from their own materials there's nothing left. What's next, a quote from Benny Hinn's newsletter? Please. I agree that Pat
Robertson and CBN are not reputable sources-- they said the U.S. should go ahead and kill the President of Venezuela. This is written like an attempt to convert everyone to a certain kind of fundamentalism. Let's delete this one. As a Catholic I find it personally embarassing to see pentecostals made to look like a bunch of charlatans and cheaters who just can't stop stretching the truth.
440:
they do when they get there? Do they meet in churches? synagogues? everyday public buildings, such as a civic center or auditorium? Is it an outdoor rally and march? Do the participants pay an entry fee or buy tickets for a certain price? Are donations collected? Where do the ticket sales or donations go once they are collected? How long does the event last? Are there guest speakers, or is a video of the one main leader played for all participants to see? If so many notable people support this event, then what do they actually DO at the events? Do they all get up and speak to the audience? Wouldn't local newspapers make at least a brief mention that such an event occured in their towns? Can someone get a copy?
985:
is and you weren't able to distinguish a press release from an actual article by an actual journalist. Wait until another person whose research skills are more advanced comes along and helps with the article, rather than making personal attacks against those who have flagged cogent issues with the article. Just because you LIKE this event or organization doesn't mean that you have been able to locate independent, reliable references to fix the problems with the article. Stop making this a personal issue. If you can't stop making it a personal issue, that's a good reason to take a couple days away from the article. The article will probably still be here when you get back.
739:
nonreligious newspaper followed up on the press release and went on their own to cover the event. Good research takes time, Home
Computer. It may be that the research needed to improve this article cannot be accomplished by a few quick Google searches. It may be that the reliable, reputable sources that are needed are really out there, but that it will take a few days to get a copy of the news articles in actual paper form and give the references. Don't get so worried about this process. It doesn't depend all on yourself. Let the tags do their work to attract the attention of other people who can come and help.
960:
in the way of independent sources. Neither are articles published by organizations that are participating in the event hosted by the group, club or organization made the subject of this article. Give it some time, so that other
Wikipedians who have stronger research skills and more experience can come to the article and help to accomplish something with it. It doesn't all depend on you. Let the tags do their work to get other people in on the process. Be patient, Home Computer, and don't be angry. Others will come and help if you let the tags stay up on the article.
1037:. The title reflected what the meager evidence available ACTUALLY SAID. To date you have not provided anything to show what the other participants outside of Jerusalem ACTUALLY DID. For all that we know, they just added a few prayers for Jerusalem in with their regular Sunday prayers in their Church services. For all that we know, the Hayford group "coordinators" did nothing but send out flyers asking preachers to pray about something on the same day. Ho-hum. That's not much for an encyclopedia article.
661:. We have only pointed out how MUCH work the article needs so that many, many Wikipedians can join in to fix it. If appropriate 3rd party documentation isn't referenced on this article, say, a week from now, someone just might propose that the article be deleted altogether. Everyone in this discussion, including yourself, has given reasons why this topic may not be notable enough for a Knowledge (XXG) article. Now the task is to find INDEPENDENT resources confirming that the event is indeed notable.
504:, Home Computer. By all rights this article should have already been nominated for deletion from Knowledge (XXG) altogether because it is not an encyclopedic article. Instead of nominating the article for deletion I have proposed that certain work be done on the article to make it cogent to this site. As you can see from other participants, the problems I have noted are recognized by others who would also like to see the article STAY on Knowledge (XXG) once it is developed properly.
382:
event. I live in
Alabama. The secular media has a lot of respect for the fact that a majority of the people here are Bible-based Protestants, and they report on large prayer gatherings and religious rallies routinely (even though they are American media). I am sure there are other areas where the major newspapers of each city report on religious events. Try Atlanta, or the "Religion" section of newspapers in Chicago or even Las Vegas. Home Computer,
921:
reports by consumer watchdog organizations6 except for the following: Media reprints of press releases, other publications where the club or organization talks about itself, and advertising for the club, society, or organization. 1 Works carrying merely trivial coverage, such as newspaper articles that simply announce forthcoming club meetings or the publications of telephone numbers and addresses in directories.
940:
of other
Wikipedians who DO have those skills, and then they will be able to lend a hand! At present, facts derived from primarily Original Research have been added to the article. These facts can be verified by independent sources which other Wikipedians can look up for you. Give them a chance to see the tags and some time to do their research. NO ONE has proposed this article for deletion, just for IMPROVEMENT!
102:
81:
50:
585:. If the event really did happen in 169 countries as is claimed, and if such notables as are named were truly present, then there must certainly have been a mention somewhere in an independent news source. Once someone finds this information it will certainly address some of the notability and POV concerns tagged on this article. Until these are located, please leave the tags on the article.
112:
21:
369:
that's not being represented I can see where your contention would lie. Actually there is.. it's called the anti-zionist Jihad.. they would probably have an opinion that's not represented here because it's not appropriate. But just because you have a problem with a
Christian/Jewish event doesn't mean it's not appropriate wiki material. --
1047:
And a very, very important note is that you have gone back through to places where neutral language has been provided and changed the words to a language of advocacy. Despite efforts to help you develop this into a real
Knowledge (XXG) article, you have twisted it around turned it into nothing but a
1000:
The OR tag wasn't even up. Perhaps you should take your own advice and take a step back, come back and examine the artiicle again.. your choice of notabillity tagging is particularly unusual. I'm not sure why you consider millions of
Christians and leaders and the Jewish government non notable.. sure
984:
The information that you added, when you deleted relevant tags without a consensus, was not sufficient to clear up the problems that the article still has. I have addressed this every time you have arbitrarily removed the tags. You have demonstrated that you do not understand what
Original Research
959:
Home
Computer, you are making accusations against me that are unsubstantiated. Your sources don't meet Knowledge (XXG) guidelines, and that's what matters. Original research and self-published sources from the organization that is the subject of the article, while interesting, aren't what is needed
801:
How many churches need to participate in an event to make it notable? To some no ammount of churches is notable. To an npov i would say that several thousand should suffice. See the external links for the numbers (in the thousands) of churches that have participated. Also, endorsements by the Israeli
1085:
Many sources are cited for this article. An argument could be made for the POV of those sources but the factually existance of this event has been indepentantly verified apart from the organization that created it. Namely several international denominations and governmetnal announcements. Also a few
939:
The tags presently on this article allow other Wikipedians to come and help fix the problems in this article. If you do not have the research skills and experience to find independent references for this article, do not fret or fear. The tags being present on the article will attract the attention
429:
To anyone interested in improving this article, you will see that Home Computer has added some links to external sources on the subject of this article, but he/she probably didn't have time at the moment to incorporate any information from those sources into the TEXT of the article. I would like to
1121:
Let's see... we're supposed to believe that there are millions and millions of people involved with this organization, but they only got "hundreds" to attend the main rally in Jerusalem all three times? Is someone going to try to sell us the Brooklyn Bridge next? The claims in the Wiki article are
920:
The club, society, or organization has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the club, society, or organization itself. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published
381:
I DON'T have any problem at all with Christian/Jewish events. In fact, as a personal note, I participate in Christian-based events whenever possible. But WHAT I AM SAYING is that I think there ARE probably legitimate secondary sources who have published SOME kind of report of this "Day of Prayer"
259:
Home Computer, these concerns we have raised were not an attempt to disparage the group, club or organization made the subject of this article, but to render assistance in making the article better and more suitable for Knowledge (XXG). The additional references you have provided appear to be only
1136:
Also, how are the Israeli Government and the Assemblies of God not 3rd party, reputible, well-known organizations? You may have missed those citations. CBN and Pat Robertson also have some pretty serious POV issues here but what they do offer is an independant source verifying the existance of the
858:
Don't think that the entire existence of this article depends only on you. it may be that you don't have the experience or skills in research needed to fix the problems in this article. That's why the tags are there. To attract others who DO have the skills and experience and let them know that
831:
No one has deleted your edits. You have not provided justification for deleting the edits by other Wikipedians, and you have deleted the tags in defiance of the general consensus of the participants in this discussion. Sad thing is, you are only preventing other Wikipedians from finding out that
368:
Listen to what you're saying. An event happens that been described as zionist involving Christian and Jewish people praying for and in Jerusalem. Israeli news papers and some Christian papers cover the story. You're upset because the BBC and New York times don't care. If there's an anti-prayer POV
347:
for an independent newspaper source that is not a religious-based publication? You might be surprised at what you'll find. If the information you are promoting here is true, I'll bet there's independent media coverage SOMEWHERE. Even a completely atheist news reporter will say "Hey, look at all
447:
Also, the people at the "Day of Prayer" organization might keep a scrapbook or file of newspaper clippings about their events, etc., including independent secular news articles. Why not ask them if they can make you some copies and send them to you with the relevant information about publication
439:
the "Day of Prayer for the Peace of Jerusalem" has been celebrated for the years of 2004, 2005 and 2006. For example: Do the participants all get online in a "virtual prayer meeting?" Are there local gatherings of participants on this "Day of Prayer?" If so, where do they gather, and what do
1092:
citing more reliable sources - I'm gonna leave that one up in case some people can come up with more, however I don't think there are more reliable sources than the ones provided. I don't think the even was covered by any major networks or anything. I cited the Israeli sources that did though.
887:
I'm sorry that you feel attacked. I'm not angry. I think it's funny that you find mllions of people including former key members of the Israelli government non notable. I'm sorry if you thought I thought you deleted anything.. I haven't. I'm actually attempting to challenge you to do SOMETHING,
476:
sources that say you have large numbers of participants, or even a lot of people aware of the effort. Knowledge (XXG) is not a bulletin board to help people promote little-known ventures, and your failure to come up with better sources than you have sure makes it look like that's what this is.
738:
It is a PRESS RELEASE. That means it is a self-published source, not a 3rd party reference. It is not an independent source, but rather it is something written by one of the participants in the event. However, a good researcher might be able to track down where a reputable and independent,
877:
Home Computer, you appear to be overcome with anger over this article. I haven't said that any particular individual mentioned in the article is non-notable, and I haven't deleted anyone's name from the article. Please stop making personal attacks. Why not try leaving the article with the
639:
But POV issues are not only found in the references cited, but also in the LANGUAGE used to describe this event. Knowledge (XXG) works by consensus, and there simply is not a consensus here. The majority opinion is that independent sources have not yet been obtained, but they would be
190:
The fact that this group, club or organization has only been producing this event or activity since 2004 suggests to me that it may not meet the notability requirement for Knowledge (XXG). If it had been consistently produced for 10 or 20 years it might be a different story altogether.
924:
Having the Israeli government do a press release for the event clearly fits notabillity for this organization. The organizations press release is also available. Also several news papers were also noted. Please do NOT add the notabillity tag again based on the wiki guidelines. Thanks.
1096:
Self published - Removed, an organization's webpage is good to cite what they claim and then to be backed up by the Israli government bullitens, the Israelli Newspaper, the smaller Christian newspapers, etc.. there's allot of good cited material that the tag doesn't account for.
580:
All of the references listed thus far are from groups which support or participate in the group, club or organization made the subject of this article. Organizations which are participating actively in the "Day of Prayer for the Peace of Jerusalem" are part of the SUBJECT and
785:
Again as noted below when your definition of a good source is one that is niether Jewish nor Christian then I believe that perhaps the POV issues are not inherrent within the article but perhaps those that would consider all Jewish and Christian sources to be bad sources.
878:
additions you have made and the tags calling out for help from other Wikipedians? Give it time, maybe a few days or a week, for others to add helpful research. You might be too emotionally involved in this article to assist in obtaining and presenting neutral material.
486:
Look all I've done is add links and make a few edits according to what the links claim. And yes only Christian and Zionist publications have a vested interest enough to publish the info. This isn't a mainstream enough event for the mainstream media so it is what it is..
826:
Home Computer, perhaps the issue is that you are unfamiliar with the style and manner of research needed for an encyclopedic article. The consensus in this discussion is that your sources are not sufficient. That doesn't mean that GOOD sources aren't out there.
285:
Well, American media sources just might not be the most reliable when it comes to global events. I'm sure if you look into Israel National News you'll find what you're looking for. Or do a google search for it yourself and let us know what you come up with. Peace.
197:
Also, the language used to describe Israel as the "Promised Land" is presented here in very non-neutral terms, expressing agreement or advocacy for the agenda of the subject group, club or organization. This can probably be cured with a simple re-write.
1132:
The Assemblies of God claims participation in their official church link. If thier churches even devoted 10 minutes of prayer on that Sunday that's millions of people right there. They are not the only church denomination to make an official stance of
1067:
You may have missed the sources that demonstrate the numbers for previous years.. also the official Assemblies of God site, the AG churches are God only knows how many countries and they made the prayer thing an official part of thier services. Peace.
513:
Maybe that's an indication that the "Day of Prayer" event shouldn't be in an article on Knowledge (XXG) yet. Maybe we should wait until they get closer to their GOAL of 100 million participants and re-visit the topic in a new article a few years from
748:
Again, read the press release to see where it came from. We have two in question, one issued by the organisers, one issed by the Israeli government. According to wiki standards, a secondary source press release is a good source for verification.
767:
Home Computer, please do not delete the tags of other Wikipedians without a consensus. let other people have a chance to know that the article has issues that need to be addressed by someone whose research skills are a little more advanced.
208:
100 million people not notable? President, prime ministers and 1000 "notable" leaders in the Christian community not good enough? :) Sources added. Also, the language used by promoters is "Promised Land" I'll add quotes to demonstrate.
443:
Seems like this "Day of Prayer" organization would have a "press kit" available with photos that could be used on Knowledge (XXG), or they might freely give permission to use some of their photos. Maybe someone can look into this.
310:
Home Computer, my google search for Israel National News returns that it is a Zionist-biased publication. And Israel Today is a biased source as well-- Their site states: "israel today is a Jerusalem-based news agency providing a
31:
467:
Maybe if you could actually put some effort into coming up with reliable sources, it might help. You claim that 100 million people are participating. Your citation for the claim is a website for the organization itself, saying
1021:
The title you used on the participation section carries the implication that only hundred took place total, I think the title needs to be reworked to count for the global participation not just the group in Jerusalem. Thanks
317:
and objective perspective on local news." It appears quite clear that these are organizations which are participating actively in the "Day of Prayer for the Peace of Jerusalem," and that makes them part of the SUBJECT and
595:
I'm sorry you feel this way but churches agreeing to pray on the same day is just not that big of a deal to mainstream media. Israeli newspapers are cited because there was a rally there. It's been cited.
904:
K, links to verification of the mayoral endorsement to the day are in place. Is that not notabillity? And if you really really feel like putting the notabillity tag up again, at least discuss the reason.
635:
Israel National News is a Zionist publication, i.e. biased in favor of the event made the subject of this article. It clearly is a PARTICIPANT in the event and not an independent reporter of facts.
194:
Since this group, club or organization claims an international following and participation, can we back this up with unbiased newspaper and other independent media coverage for the last two years?
355:
Really, even though this article has problems with the references and source material, I'd like to see it developed into a balanced encyclopedic article that all Wikipedians can be proud of.
500:, but you have done nothing to resolve those problems. You have only prevented others from having their attention brought to the fact that the unresolved problems persist and need work.
260:
press releases from the subject club, group or organization and other participants in the event made the subject of the article. These are original sources and self-published sources.
868:
Hahah.. show me the skills! Quit talking about it and fix it if it needs fixin. And I can't help it if notable Christians are not notable in your eyes.. thats not an article problem. --
386:
to find an independent secondary source for your article. There's no proof that the secular news media "didn't care" to report on your event. I'll bet they did, somewhere.
348:
those people praying over there. That's what a big bunch of people did today..." And have you tried searching for resources from the BBC or other European media sources?
458:
As I noted elsewhere if you'd spend half of the effort you gave into this talk page on the actual page, to improve the content the world would be a better place. peace. --
507:
It is very important to note that you, as an advocate for the group, club or organization made the subject of this article, admit yourself that the "Day of Prayer" event
496:
You have also removed legitimate tags placed on the article highlighting problems with the article which must be addressed before the article can be developed into a
168:
472:
is 100 million. In other words, the citation does not support the claim. Let's be frank: the article looks like promotion for your organization, and I don't see any
972:
As I said I find your efforts amusing not angering. Take a look at the new sources that have been placed since you put all the tags back up for the fourth time. --
732:
It's from the Knesset Christian Allies Caucus Administrative Assistant. Did you even read it? So what not the Whole Isralli government is non-notable and POV'd?--
653:
Please leave the tags on the article so that others who may be more experienced researchers than yourself can dig in to reliable sources to support this article.
1165:
158:
328:
And in any case, an article which only reprints the group, club, or organization's own press release is not very helpful in producing an encyclopedic resource.
1170:
1160:
625:
This is a recognised newspaper, not a Christian source. Completely different POV than the Christian links provided. It agrees with the other sources. --
134:
1089:
notabillity guideline - Removed, the indepentant sources apply to meet more than the bare minumum for an organization, read the guidelines for more.
1001:
you have a problem accepting thier media but to say that thier endorsement qualifies as lack of notibility doesn't add up to good editorialism.--
950:
When your definition of a good source is one that is not Jewish and one that is not Christian I do not think that your request is applicable. --
125:
86:
651:
Not once. I think your contributions are worth something, just that those contributions haven't cleared up the problems in the article.
535:
goal is to be independently wealthy on my private Carribean island, but in the meantime I'll keep working through another Chicago winter.
888:
perhaps ANYTHING to improve the article other than to talk and tag. Like showing me those sweet skills you were talkin about. :) Peace --
917:
Criteria for clubs, societies, and organizations A club, society, or organization is notable if it meets any of the following criteria:
392:
article! Don't just advertise an agenda that is important to you, show in a neutral manner how this article BELONGS in Knowledge (XXG).
410:
Again, since you have so much energy vested in this article FEEL FREE to take your own suggestions and actually improve the article. --
1086:
Christian news sources writing an article on it or interviewing about it. This satisfies the concerns in the 3 tags present..
61:
657:
You have responded on this discussion page as if you believe you are defending this article from possible deletion. But
430:
encourage your participation in looking for information that can appropriately be worked in to the TEXT of the article.
859:
their help is needed. You are extinguishing the S.O.S. beacon that would lead the cavalry here to come to the rescue!
264:
is not what goes in a Knowledge (XXG) article. SURELY an even of the magnitude you have described has been covered by
27:
553:
Well that's a wonderful goal, in the meantime the article is noted that 100Million is the goal and not the facts. --
647:, but they are not sufficient to overcome or solve the problems that persist in the article. Please note that I
67:
49:
687:
This is a link to a COMMUNITY CALENDAR, where the organization that is the subject of the article posted its
1142:
1105:
1145:
1126:
1108:
1072:
1058:
1026:
1005:
989:
976:
964:
954:
944:
929:
909:
892:
882:
872:
863:
848:
836:
818:
806:
790:
779:
753:
743:
727:
711:
695:
679:
665:
629:
600:
589:
557:
548:
539:
518:
491:
481:
462:
452:
414:
397:
373:
359:
290:
280:
249:
235:
226:
213:
202:
133:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1101:
672:
20:
117:
812:
1138:
1069:
1023:
1002:
973:
951:
926:
906:
889:
869:
845:
815:
803:
802:
government, endorsements by all sorts of well known Christian leaders.. it's notable allready. --
787:
750:
733:
708:
676:
626:
597:
576:
Please, someone, add independent 3rd-party references, not just advocates for the "Day of Prayer"
554:
488:
459:
411:
370:
287:
246:
232:
210:
637:
Since it is clearly in favor of the event by editorial policy it is not a different POV at all.
261:
675:
Yup. Good old FOX news covered the event. :) Tags removed. Side note.. thats a lame link. --
497:
1123:
1055:
986:
961:
941:
879:
860:
833:
776:
740:
724:
692:
662:
618:
586:
545:
515:
449:
394:
356:
277:
199:
723:
from the organization made the basis of this article. It is not an independent resource.
219:
1042:
You have provided nothing but the promotional efforts of this group's own participants.
269:
1154:
536:
478:
223:
621:
Here is a respected Christian news source that covers issues such as this commonly.
130:
388:
I want to encourage you! Roll up your sleeves and do some research cogent to an
107:
101:
80:
704:
622:
265:
111:
844:
I removed the tag for notabillity because I added proof of notabillity. --
448:
dates, page in publication, name of publication, name of reporters, etc.
222:
on the 100 million? Reports in independent news media, for example?
306:
Israel National News, Israel Today, biased non-independent sources
832:
their help is needed and WANTED to make this a very GOOD article!
673:
http://community.fox16.com/calendar/communitycalendar/748230.aspx
433:
No information has been added to the article to describe exactly
649:
have not deleted any content that you have added to the article.
813:
http://ew.us.churchinsight.com/group/group.aspx?id=1000002775--
914:
This is gonna be long.. Please review notabillity guidelines:
273:
43:
15:
703:
Here's a wierd one.. but it fits your cry for independance..
502:
Please stop arbitrarily removing tags posted by other editors
343:, maybe that is a personal bias on your part. Have you even
935:
Please do not delete tags until a consensus has been reached
854:
Unfortunately, the information you added, though valuable,
614:
510:"isn't a mainstream enough event for the mainstream media."
619:
http://www.christianpost.com/article/20050922/22414.htm
245:
Israel national news should do nicely as well yes? --
527:
one million people would be worth a lot more than a
129:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
829:Please stop deleting tags posted by other editors.
331:If you don't trust American media sources to even
770:No one has proposed this article for deletion,
231:On it. Chek out the Israel today link. Peace --
645:your contributions to the article are valuable
617:here is the original claim from the source.
8:
659:no one has proposed the article for deletion
47:
705:http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=31091
623:http://www.israelnn.com/news.php3?id=69672
425:CONTENT of the article needs a LOT of work
75:
1117:Article is sloppy and just not believable
719:Unfortunately it is only a re-print of a
337:an event which you claim has significant
143:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Christianity
856:did not constitute proof of notability.
384:I just think you haven't even tried yet
77:
811:Here's a link to some of the leaders:
774:don't panic so much as if someone had.
691:. It is not an independent resource.
7:
1166:Low-importance Christianity articles
1048:sermon for your religious beliefs.
276:or some such independent new source?
123:This article is within the scope of
583:not independent reporters of events
320:not independent reporters of events
66:It is of interest to the following
186:This Article Needs Better Material
14:
1171:WikiProject Christianity articles
1161:Start-Class Christianity articles
146:Template:WikiProject Christianity
1051:Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox
110:
100:
79:
48:
30:on 19 March 2017. The result of
19:
163:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
1:
137:and see a list of open tasks.
1146:23:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
1127:23:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
1109:19:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
1073:21:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1059:20:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1027:14:17, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
1006:00:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
990:00:33, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
977:00:19, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
965:22:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
955:22:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
945:22:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
930:00:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
910:00:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
893:00:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
883:23:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
873:22:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
864:22:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
849:21:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
837:21:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
819:21:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
807:21:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
791:22:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
780:22:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
754:14:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
744:23:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
728:22:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
712:22:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
696:22:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
680:21:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
666:21:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
630:21:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
601:21:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
590:20:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
558:21:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
549:20:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
540:20:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
519:20:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
492:20:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
482:19:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
463:19:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
453:19:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
415:20:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
398:19:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
374:19:30, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
360:18:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
291:18:06, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
281:18:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
250:18:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
236:17:57, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
227:17:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
214:17:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
203:17:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
1034:Wishing will not make it so
1187:
169:project's importance scale
523:I think that a verified,
162:
95:
74:
1081:Sources and Notablillity
615:http://www.daytopray.com
544:Hey, that's my goal too!
126:WikiProject Christianity
56:This article is rated
149:Christianity articles
60:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
118:Christianity portal
62:content assessment
689:OWN PRESS RELEASE
262:Original Research
183:
182:
179:
178:
175:
174:
42:
41:
1178:
531:of 100 million.
498:Featured Article
220:Reliable Sources
218:Can you provide
151:
150:
147:
144:
141:
120:
115:
114:
104:
97:
96:
91:
83:
76:
59:
53:
52:
44:
23:
16:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1151:
1150:
1119:
1083:
1019:
937:
799:
643:Home Computer,
612:
578:
427:
352:not American...
308:
188:
148:
145:
142:
139:
138:
116:
109:
89:
57:
12:
11:
5:
1184:
1182:
1174:
1173:
1168:
1163:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1134:
1133:participation.
1118:
1115:
1113:
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1062:
1061:
1045:
1038:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
995:
994:
993:
992:
970:
969:
968:
967:
936:
933:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
842:
841:
840:
839:
798:
795:
794:
793:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
701:
700:
699:
698:
669:
668:
655:
641:
611:
608:
606:
604:
603:
577:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
505:
426:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
417:
403:
402:
401:
400:
367:
365:
364:
363:
362:
353:
329:
307:
304:
302:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
270:New York Times
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
187:
184:
181:
180:
177:
176:
173:
172:
165:Low-importance
161:
155:
154:
152:
135:the discussion
122:
121:
105:
93:
92:
90:Low‑importance
84:
72:
71:
65:
54:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1183:
1172:
1169:
1167:
1164:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1156:
1147:
1144:
1140:
1139:Home Computer
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1125:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1110:
1107:
1103:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1087:
1080:
1074:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1052:
1046:
1044:
1043:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1025:
1016:
1014:
1007:
1004:
1003:Home Computer
999:
998:
997:
996:
991:
988:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
975:
974:Home Computer
966:
963:
958:
957:
956:
953:
952:Home Computer
949:
948:
947:
946:
943:
934:
932:
931:
928:
927:Home Computer
922:
918:
915:
912:
911:
908:
907:Home Computer
894:
891:
890:Home Computer
886:
885:
884:
881:
876:
875:
874:
871:
870:Home Computer
867:
866:
865:
862:
857:
853:
852:
851:
850:
847:
846:Home Computer
838:
835:
830:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
817:
816:Home Computer
814:
809:
808:
805:
804:Home Computer
796:
792:
789:
788:Home Computer
784:
783:
782:
781:
778:
775:
773:
755:
752:
747:
746:
745:
742:
737:
736:
735:
734:Home Computer
731:
730:
729:
726:
722:
721:PRESS RELEASE
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
710:
709:Home Computer
706:
697:
694:
690:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
678:
677:Home Computer
674:
667:
664:
660:
656:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
627:Home Computer
624:
620:
616:
609:
607:
602:
599:
598:Home Computer
594:
593:
592:
591:
588:
584:
575:
559:
556:
555:Home Computer
552:
551:
550:
547:
543:
542:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
517:
512:
511:
506:
503:
499:
495:
494:
493:
490:
489:Home Computer
485:
484:
483:
480:
475:
471:
466:
465:
464:
461:
460:Home Computer
457:
456:
455:
454:
451:
445:
441:
438:
437:
431:
424:
416:
413:
412:Home Computer
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
399:
396:
393:
391:
385:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
372:
371:Home Computer
361:
358:
354:
351:
346:
342:
341:
336:
335:
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
321:
316:
315:
305:
303:
292:
289:
288:Home Computer
284:
283:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
247:Home Computer
237:
234:
233:Home Computer
230:
229:
228:
225:
221:
217:
216:
215:
212:
211:Home Computer
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
195:
192:
185:
170:
166:
160:
157:
156:
153:
136:
132:
128:
127:
119:
113:
108:
106:
103:
99:
98:
94:
88:
85:
82:
78:
73:
69:
63:
55:
51:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1120:
1112:
1102:Homecomputer
1099:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1084:
1070:Homecomputer
1050:
1049:
1041:
1040:
1033:
1032:
1024:Homecomputer
1020:
1017:Recent Edits
1012:
971:
938:
923:
919:
916:
913:
903:
855:
843:
828:
810:
800:
771:
769:
766:
751:Homecomputer
720:
702:
688:
670:
658:
652:
648:
644:
636:
613:
605:
582:
579:
532:
528:
524:
509:
508:
501:
473:
469:
446:
442:
435:
434:
432:
428:
390:encyclopedic
389:
387:
383:
366:
349:
344:
339:
338:
333:
332:
319:
313:
312:
309:
301:
244:
196:
193:
189:
164:
140:Christianity
131:Christianity
124:
87:Christianity
68:WikiProjects
35:
797:Notabillity
58:Start-class
1155:Categories
1124:DismasMama
1056:OfficeGirl
987:OfficeGirl
962:OfficeGirl
942:OfficeGirl
880:OfficeGirl
861:OfficeGirl
834:OfficeGirl
777:OfficeGirl
741:OfficeGirl
725:OfficeGirl
693:OfficeGirl
663:OfficeGirl
610:Neutrality
587:OfficeGirl
546:OfficeGirl
516:OfficeGirl
470:their goal
450:OfficeGirl
395:OfficeGirl
357:OfficeGirl
278:OfficeGirl
200:OfficeGirl
1137:event. --
640:welcomed.
340:magnitude
266:USA Today
1100:Peace --
671:Hahah..
537:Fan-1967
479:Fan-1967
474:reliable
314:biblical
224:Fan-1967
28:deletion
350:They're
334:mention
268:or the
167:on the
772:please
525:actual
345:looked
64:scale.
1143:Peace
1106:Peace
529:goal
514:now.
36:keep
34:was
436:HOW
322:.
274:CNN
272:or
159:Low
1157::
1068:--
1054:.
1022:--
925:--
905:--
786:--
749:--
707:--
596:--
533:My
487:--
286:--
209:--
1141:∴
1104:∴
171:.
70::
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
