169:) and most have been addressed. I'm glad problems with citations and other major concerns have been taken care of. I've taken the liberty of copyediting the article in some portions. Overall, I believe the article meets the GA criteria; it is comprehensive, well-sourced, and very well organised. I still believe it would benefit from further copyediting, as prose could only get better with more work, but otherwise it's readable and is according to me satisfactory as is. Well done.
42:
80:
70:
47:
75:
126:
156:
52:
122:
107:
99:
150:
170:
146:
115:
17:
92:
180:
160:
166:
134:
103:
165:
All my comments can be found in the previous section (
8:
30:
61:
33:
7:
24:
1:
181:20:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
161:19:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
196:
89:
88:
187:
177:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
195:
194:
190:
189:
188:
186:
185:
184:
171:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
193:
191:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
192:
183:
182:
178:
176:
175:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
173:
172:
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
18:Talk:Dabangg
104:visual edit
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
157:contribs
147:Shshshsh
76:Criteria
127:history
108:history
94:Article
174:Shahid
136:Watch
16:<
167:here
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
179:•
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.