1369:
problem, as Shobaa Dee is not an experienced critic, and she has been in light only because of her controversial reviews. In any case, they fit better in the controversy section and also, if I am not mistaken, her review was published in the
Bangalore Times, and it clearly says that TOI does not take responsibility for all such things published in it. The fact is that it is controversial, and recognized only for its status as one. Salman's off-screen acts have also been criticized by her, specifically the Mumbai blasts and some others, perhaps. The rants of the film-makers are associated with her review, and not at all with her criticism on Salman's comments regarding the event. Hence, mentioning the review in one section and the response in another section would make no sense
477:
1390:
way he reviews films, and apart from that, you can't really tell me the cresentials and the experience of each of the reviewers appearing on the page, can you? Her comments against Mr. Khan have nothing to do with the review, and yes, they should be discussed individually, if anything (except for "boycott
Dabangg" it's got nothing to do with the film at all). Stars can always hit back at reviewers for not having satisfied their expectations. Anurag Kashyap, for one, spoke publicly against almost all the reviewers who were critical of
1116:
Shobaa Dee is not compulsory for GA criteria i.e broad coverage but not comprehensive at the call. Awards and nominations have a separate article, its again optional to have a summary here, but still the article is linked and that is good enough. Character map of remakes is present in quite a lot of films which have been remade into two or more languages. Its arbitrary but no harm in having it. It gives details about what role has been essayed by whom. Arora's item number is necessary. Looking at films like
1721:) and most have been addressed. I'm glad problems with citations and other major concerns have been taken care of. I've taken the liberty of copyediting the article in some portions. Overall, I believe the article meets the GA criteria; it is comprehensive, well-sourced, and very well organised. I still believe it would benefit from further copyediting, as prose could only get better with more work, but otherwise it's readable and is according to me satisfactory as is. Well done.
344:
21:
2562:
219:
274:
250:
150:
69:
1267:
the name of the website, the date of publication (if known)..." - I think the more the better, if you do not have enough time for that, it's understandeable, but it's not just that: some of the sources (49) lack accessdates, newspaper names should appear in italics (WP:MOS) - the entire list of references should be properly formatted. Consistency is good but why not be consistently good?
399:
1162:. The fact that such trivial tables exist in other articles does not mean it should be here. I find that it has little relevance on the article. It's also quite puzzling that you say "no harm in having it" while not addressing more important points such as citation format and addition of more reviews, justifying that it's not a must, while insisting to have this insignificant table.
372:
284:
409:
2485:
513:
2265:
1631:
1439:), which everyone must respect. For me, the problem with Shobhaa De is a major one. She wrote a published review, and it should be mentioned in an appropriate section, period. This wasn't such a major controversy, and the article implies that De was critical of the film because of Salman Khan's offscreen acts - complete violation of
1310:
everything that's not "mandatory"? I don't think so. If you want to have a good article you have to work a little harder (I'm not referring to you in particular). If dates and authors are available then it's definitely worth adding. If you still disagree, then maybe a third party would be a good way to go.
595:
It is not realistic that a bollywood movie trailor will become the most watched video in "internet", just 9 hours after it got publishged. The source in reference (thaindian.com) does not seem to be a valid one. Also, the article itself suggests it is the most watched video "in a popular web portal",
1465:
turn out as a GA review eventually (not that it matters because every editor's rational comments should be respected and not just ignored). If you still disagree with what I'm saying, I don't mind even starting an RfC about the problems (particularly De's review), but it will just ruin the article's
1223:
itself says that it is not imperious to include all fields. I just thought of implementing a consistency in the references so that it is paltrier to identify. Kindly enumerate the section in which you would like the controversy to be added in. I removed the table, but still I see no proper induction
1165:
The other quote added into the box is in my view even less suitable, considering it is less an analysis of the film and more about perception of Indian cinema as a whole and discussion of other filmmakers which does not contribure much to the article. I would add the Nikhat Kazmi quote which appears
1389:
I totally, and respectfully, disagree about De (by the way, it's De not Dee). She is a published writer, period. If she writes a certain critique for a newspaper then it counts just as much as every other review on the article, and is equally important. Taran Adarsh is also often criticised for the
1286:
I don't think so. The denial of author and date of publication does not drive the article away from GA status because the guildeline itself says that it is not mandatory. The same applies for the controversial reaction of a critic. And please point out the sections which need a copy-edit, if any. I
1266:
I don't want to turn it into an argument of sorts, I don't mind taking it to another board (and after all I'm saying it just to have a better article). WP:CITEHOW says "Citations for World Wide Web pages typically include the name of the author(s), the title of the article (within quotation marks),
1076:
I do not quite see the need for a "Character map of remakes" - which seems to contain trivial info which is not as relevant on this article. Mentioning it in prose is more than enough. And btw, the entire section of "Remakes" could be incorporated into the previous one ("Sequel") to have one decent
1545:
to the full review of
Shobhaa De, which was published separately. She says, "Let’s hand it to Salman who has pulled off the stunts and pelvic thrusts. Nothing new there. But it is the naughty self-parodying, which is so camp, so out there, which delivers the biggest punch. What’s left for this guy
1180:
Too much weight is given to its performance at the box office. Mentioning the overall performance would be more than enough - top day grosser, week grosser, weekend grosser, are just too much detail for the lead and belong in the body. See, "The film broke many records at the box office within the
1169:
I disagree about the suggested importance of Arora's cameo, and I can't see how it can be possibly seen as "necessary" in what should essentially be a summary of the article (WP:LEAD). Removing it would, in turn, shorten the lead. Once again, the fact that it cameos are mentioned in other articles
1328:
her full review of the film, and not even once does she mention Salman's offscreen acts as having any influence on her review. The fact that she called to boycott
Dabangg is an altogether different story which can be mentioned separately but it should not be mixed with her review, which should be
1228:
cast. An item number receiving a notice from almost all critics makes it worthy of inclusion. I added a small bit about the awards, just enough to keep it on border. The rest of it can be obtained from the main article. If any specific problem is there regarding the lead, let me know. I guess you
1173:
I think a short mention of awards the film won would only make the reading experience better. Nowhere in the article is it mentioned that the film was awarded "Best Film" honours at popular award functions, and that Salman received some for his performance. The awards page stands on its own after
1115:
I have patched up some of these. References are good enough if they contain the title, url, publisher and access date. All of them now satisfy that. Author and date are optional, and not mandatory. The quote from Nikhat Kazmi has been replaced with one from the
Statesman. The critical review from
1066:
The critical response section has one hell of a block containing a long quote from Nikhat Kazmi - should be shortened as I believe such boxes are mostly used to have short, memorable and to-the-point quotes rather than long, detailed reviews. Actually Kazmi's other quote which appears in the body
1368:
given for any sentence contained within it and it is all presented in a neutral manner. They may be generally deprecated, but that does not make it so in all articles, and again this does not violate GA standard by any means, whatsoever. Shifting it to the reception section would create a major
1309:
Nowhere in the guideline is it said that it's not mandatory. Adding a reception section is not mandatory either, having sections of remakes and controversies are not mandotory either. You could just have two lines to establish general notability and that's it. Does it mean you should just avoid
1256:
I am perfectly aware of the GA criteria, and have reviewed several articles for GA in the past (and contributed to several GAs as well). Mind you, what I present here is not a GA review (probably as of yet, depends on how much time I happen to have), these are suggestions to improve the article
1457:
Prose needs work. Just look at one sentence (from a quick glance into one of the setions): "In recent time, Arbaaz Khan has cast south baddie
Prakash Raj as the villain in Dabangg 2 and Sonakshi Sinha continues as leading lady." - What's "recent time"? "south baddie Prakash Raj"! Huh?! Is it a
1122:, which have details of cameos and guest appearances in the same, this one is no different. Critical acclaim has been added and the story in one line is summarizing the entire plot. The lead is already a tad too long and increasing it more is not going to be of any advantage. Regards.
682:
Dear lord, this plot summary is horrendously written. If I'd seen the movie, I might even fix it myself. As it stands, it's terrible. (Why is this the case with so many Indian movie articles? Right, because nobody editing the
English Knowledge (XXG) knows much about them :/)
1143:
Well no, author and date fields should be included if the info is available and they should not be avoided just because it is not technically "mandatory". This is essential and that's the proper way in which the sources should be formatted. For further info, please see
1549:
I would also like to clarify that my comments appear here only in order to improve the article. I appreciate your work on film articles and I'm always excited about new GANs and FACs related to Indian cinema, that's why I want their quality to be as good as it gets.
1058:
I see the article is a GAN - I actually started overlooking it on my watchlist but I'm happy with the expansion. I do not have enough time to review it for GA myself, but there are several points which must be taken care of as it's definitely not GA quality yet:
1542:
1325:
1152:
568:
The official
English released title of the movie may be fearless, though that is not the appropriate translation of the hindi word. Dabangg would translate to something like spunk with arrogance. Pls someone figure a way out to address this
703:. It was worse than horrendous. I saw the film and re-wrote the plot, in a neutral tone and as accurately as possible. But, if I have made any grammatical mistake or have misspelled a word, anyone is welcome to correct them.
2429:"It opened up across 1,800 screens in India and around 300 screens overseas" - this wasn't mentioned before, it only said that it released in 1800 screens worldwide? Should the previous statement be 2100 screens worldwide?
1517:
include the name of the author(s), the title of the article (within quotation marks), the name of the website, the date of publication (if known), the date you retrieved the page." That does not mean it always
2762:
2038:
1166:
in the body text ("For anybody who wants to know what is..."), which is a more appropriate summary of what the reviewer thinks about the film, and would be quite effective as a representative quote.
1151:
There's no such thing as "compulsory" as far as critics' reviews are concerned, nothing is compulsory as such anyway, but it should not be ignored if it's mentioned and suggested on the talk page.
2807:
2822:
1321:). It's better to incorporate relevant info into the rest of the article. Coming to Shobhaa De's review, it could easily be shifted to the reception section as one of the comments.
486:
382:
353:
260:
1224:
for that. The quote box has been addressed. It has been ousted with Nikhat Kazmi's quote from TOI. There has been sufficient dope about the item number and it is a part of the
1203:
I may end up reviewing the article for GA, but there are too many problems there, and as I said it is not Ga quality as of yet. The article is in need of a thorough copyedit.
2797:
2303:
1669:
1092:
The film's story must be mentioned at least in short. "The film is set in the Indian state of Uttar
Pradesh and revolves around a cop named Chulbul Pandey" is not enough.
2690:
2686:
2672:
2048:
1394:. Now that can be mentioned, of course, but not in this way, ignoring her personal views of the film as a critic in favour of a Twitter controversy it went on to spark.
1324:
Which brings me to the next point, and it is the suggested bias of De's review. It is after all normal critique which she wrote for a leading newspaper. You can see
1435:
Well, my friend, it really depends on who the reviewer is. There should be much more to an argument than "GA criteria" - there's also common sense and policy (like
2293:
2018:
1659:
2802:
491:
171:
2812:
2777:
2638:
1190:"and went on to become a commercial success" - this is just repeating what the previous sentence just said. No need to emphasise its commercial success.
1073:"Awards and nominations" can still have a short summary of awards and nominations, and of course mention of music awards, which the film got so many of.
32:
154:
1488:
Salman Khan's shocking statement about 26/11 smacks of arrogance, ignorance and plain stupidity. A lame apology won't do Sallu bhai. Boycott
Dabangg.
467:
2772:
1482:
I fail to comprehend why "the article implies that De was critical of the film because of Salman Khan's offscreen acts" is a "complete violation of
2270:
1808:
1636:
643:
Any help would be appreciated regarding the plot. For those who have seen the film, please write a concise summary in a neutral tone. Please see
2385:
and tells the story of a corrupt but fearless police officer, Chulbul Pandey, and his troubled relationship with his stepfather and half-brother
2792:
2757:
457:
664:
At the moment there is absolutely nothing that even says what this movie is about... even a 3 line plot summary would be great for a start...
50:
1360:. Removing sections on the basis of them not being mandatory does not remunerate the "broad coverage" requirement, and an article satisfying
1229:
took care of the rest of the lead issues. And finally, your issues which have not been addressed do not go against the article receiving a
576:
1263:
The review of Shobha De would be relevant in the "Critical response" section, unless you'd want to have the controversy itself mentioned.
2817:
1965:
There's nothing in the Chulbul Pandey article to justify a separate page. (Current timestamp so the bot will not remove the RfC notice.
1196:
My suggestion for the first senctence "The film opened to generally positive reviews and broke several box-office records upon release".
665:
2752:
2383:"and tells the story of Chulbul Pandey and his troubled relationship with his stepfather and half-brother" - this might read better as
2782:
1900:
1329:
among all the other reviews on the article in the appropriate section. The filmmakers' angry rants can be mentioned right after that.
2298:
1818:
1664:
302:
38:
1830:
1770:
2787:
2143:
2767:
1978:
631:
189:
230:
1708:
2275:
1641:
432:
422:
377:
2482:
Overall a very well written and comprehensive article, I enjoyed reading it! Once they're all clarified you can have a GA.
2380:"with debutante Sonakshi Sinha" - what makes Sonakshi Sinha debutante? Is this referring to her as a character in the film?
2435:" Box Office India declared the film as a "Blockbuster" in India after its first week run" - why is blockbuster in quotes?
314:
306:
1159:
310:
297:
255:
2733:
2342:
2172:
Pointed here by the random RFC bot. The article doesnt justify itself as a separate article. It consists of two lines.
550:
2639:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150509165746/http://koimoi.c2w.com/2010/09/10/dabangg-review-salman-khan-by-komal-nahta/
2514:, I have just finished the rest of the review now. Once the remaining issues are addressed this should be good to go.
1856:
1796:
1747:
1594:
1575:
1531:
1499:
1425:
1378:
1296:
1246:
1131:
1047:
546:
1566:
Please excuse me for a couple of days. I will be back and look into those issues. Thanks for the congenial comments.
2414:"Chulbul meets Dayal Babu (Anupam Kher), the leader of Lok Manch" - what is Lok Manch? This wasn't described before?
1585:
As worded, I have added De's review in the critical response section and added dates and authors wherever possible.
2109:
2080:
1974:
1397:
I have absolutely no problem with the Controversy section, it was just a suggestion to improve the article further.
1181:
first week of its release. It also received a lot of critical acclaim and went on to become a commercial success."
1364:
does not fundamentally have the status of exhibiting itself as a GA. Coming to the controversy section, I find no
2113:
1996:
2689:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2445:
2317:
1683:
1490:" It is obvious that she said "boycott Dabangg", because of the comments. If I am mistaken, please let me know.
1809:
http://entertainment.oneindia.in/bollywood/features/2012/salman-khan-dabangg-2-shooting-start-today-090312.html
580:
236:
2642:
1785:
Could you please provide sources for the commencement of shooting? Otherwise, the article cannot be created.
669:
2724:
2630:
2423:"Some people have alleged that it is inspired from the Pakistani song" - weasel words, I'd rephrase this to
1995:
has been covered by third party sources in a way that cannot be /is not already covered in this article. --
1904:
1823:
have a look at these, and its surprising how wikipedia is sooo behind. PLZ NOW MAKE A PAGE FOR DABBANGG 2.
2108:
suffers from the same (and even more) lack of content particularly anything encyclopedic as when it was at
1896:
1834:
1826:
1774:
1766:
619:
572:
2387:? Or something similar? If so, remove the short sentence "Pandey is a corrupt but fearless police officer"
2208:
2064:
1847:
1787:
1740:
1738:
I must say, Christ and you be thanked! You've made a large addition to the terrific moments of my memoir.
1587:
1568:
1524:
1492:
1418:
1416:
I repeat, if it turns a blind eye to the GA criteria, its worth scrutinizing. But apparently, it doesn't.
1371:
1289:
1239:
1124:
1043:
2417:" They come to an agreement to keep Chedi in control" - this didn't make sense to me, in control of what?
554:
2708:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
2696:
2160:
2068:
1881:
1170:
does not necessarily make it essential in this one, unless there was more discussion of her item number.
615:
The plot has been copied from a news article. Can someone please re-write the plot in their own words.
164:
20:
2629:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1813:
1306:
I mentioned a couple of sentences about Dee in the controversy section. 14:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
476:
2663:
2139:
2056:
734:
657:
1510:
1447:
1270:
A thorough copyedit is still in need. I'll see if I can do it later in the day or ask someone else.
1220:
1145:
644:
42:
2225:
1400:
I still have a problem, however, with the lacking format of the citations, but more on this later.
627:
601:
149:
68:
1819:
http://www.glamsham.com/movies/scoops/12/mar/09-news-dabangg-2-shooting-commences-today-031205.asp
2191:
2084:
1966:
1702:
708:
2693:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1483:
1440:
1436:
1365:
1314:
2709:
1873:
Planning to add audio file,most perchance tittle track.Top contributors let me know. Thank You
1070:
Speaking of reviews, what about Shobhaa De's critical review which created so much controversy?
2204:
2173:
2052:
1357:
688:
1318:
1086:
Is Malaika Arora's item number that essential in the lead? And the trailer? I don't think so.
2594:
2573:
2547:
2523:
2496:
2462:
2361:
2336:
2321:
2156:
2088:
2060:
1970:
1874:
1687:
1039:
135:
116:
97:
2716:
1926:
1361:
1234:
2131:
2104:
has been the subject of any third party discussion. the contents at the recreated stub at
2076:
1063:
The references are not properly formatted - with dates and authors missing all throughout.
723:
648:
2220:
After reviewing the relevant material I'm inclined to support merging the two articles. -
1763:
dabangg 2 shooting has began and its suprising to see theres no page on it in wikipedia
1230:
1187:"a lot of critical acclaim" - a lot? Does not sound objective or encyclopedic in any way.
2420:"but eventually changed his mind and roped in Salman" - 'roped in' sounds a bit informal
1356:
To determine an article's prospect in becoming GA, the only benchmark to look at is the
1260:
I'm happy you've addressed some of the issues, the article looks much better. Well done.
1158:"Character map of remakes is present in quite a lot of films" - now let me refer you to
343:
2675:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
2221:
2105:
2014:
1916:
623:
597:
521:
2715:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
2682:
1030:
Adding this table gives a clear picture of the film's performance in several markets.
2746:
2187:
1950:
1944:
1722:
1698:
1551:
1467:
1401:
1330:
1271:
1204:
1099:
719:
704:
1177:
Please remember that it's not the length of the lead which matters, but the content.
2029:
1541:
Sorry, there must have been a misunderstanding here regarding Miss De's comments -
700:
684:
414:
2424:
2409:
2399:
2395:
2384:
301:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can
2588:
2566:
2541:
2536:
2516:
2511:
2489:
2456:
2354:
2332:
1893:
please make another page for "chulbul pandey" as the charater is really famous
289:
2681:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
2072:
1038:
Should a separate article be created for the awards received by the film like
404:
279:
273:
249:
158:
2324:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
1690:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
545:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
512:
398:
371:
2643:
http://koimoi.c2w.com/2010/09/10/dabangg-review-salman-khan-by-komal-nahta
1034:
Proposal to create a separate article for the awards conferred on the film
318:
2622:
2203:
Until the creator wishes to expand it, which I don't think he will do.
183:
1118:
430:-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the
1814:
http://www.indicine.com/movies/bollywood/dabangg-2-shooting-begins/
591:
Removed The claim "the promo is the most watched video in internet"
1083:
Arbaaz Khan is linked twice in one paragraph! "Eid" is not linked.
427:
2559:
Thanks for addressing them! This looks good to go now, well done
2130:
I closed the AfD, but I'm afraid I have no opinion as an editor.—
2019:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Log/2015 January 5#Chulbul Pandey
2237:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
2039:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure
2738:
2601:
2581:
2554:
2531:
2504:
2469:
2369:
2346:
2229:
2212:
2195:
2178:
2164:
2147:
2121:
2092:
2041:
after consensus has been reached or 30 days have passed. I am
2004:
1982:
1955:
1908:
1883:
1862:
1838:
1802:
1778:
1752:
1732:
1718:
1712:
1599:
1580:
1561:
1536:
1504:
1477:
1430:
1411:
1383:
1340:
1301:
1281:
1251:
1214:
1136:
1109:
736:
712:
692:
673:
659:
635:
605:
584:
507:
212:
2100:
As per before, there is still no evidence that the character
2763:
Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are good articles
2648:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
475:
342:
746:
2633:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2404:"Chedi takes advantage of the situation, and takes Makkhi
1446:
And the sources, as I said, are in need of formatting per
1313:
Also, having controversy sections is problematic to avoid
1193:
Too many "also" take away from the quality of the prose.
2626:
2586:
Thank you for your positive review. My first GA! :) --
2022:
2010:
128:
109:
90:
2394:
worldwide" - would be worth rephrasing this to either
2390:"Dabangg was released during Eid on 10 September 2010
1717:
All my comments can be found in the previous section (
426:, which aims to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of
1935:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2243:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2049:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Chulbul Pandey
1925:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
2685:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2352:I'll finish this review by tomorrow at the latest
2808:GA-Class Indian cinema articles of Mid-importance
2823:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use Indian English
1237:and look through all the points given. Thanks.
1174:all, and that's why it's called "Main article".
317:. To improve this article, please refer to the
2671:This message was posted before February 2018.
2112:. There is in fact, nothing even to merge. --
1080:In the lead I can already spot some problems:
753:
48:If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
1937:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
2484:
722:, thanks a lot.. I appreciate your efforts.
2621:I have just modified one external link on
2253:
1619:
1233:status. If you can, please go through the
525:, which has its own spelling conventions (
366:
313:. To use this banner, please refer to the
244:
62:
15:
2798:GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
2037:I recommend posting a closure request at
2025:the article for review here and added an
1513:says "Citations for World Wide Web pages
2425:It was alleged that it was inspired from
1486:." Please go through the quote again : "
2284:
2256:
2186:Chulbul Pandey has no reason to exist.
1650:
1622:
1257:(which are quite friendly, by the way).
368:
246:
190:highest-grossing Bollywood film of 2010
2803:Mid-importance Indian cinema articles
2660:to let others know (documentation at
1317:, and they are generally deprecated (
1067:text is more suitable for a box, IMO.
553:, this should not be changed without
7:
2561:
2539:All done. Thanks for the review. --
1846:
1786:
1739:
1586:
1567:
1523:
1522:include it. Its certainly optional.
1491:
1417:
1370:
1288:
1238:
1123:
1077:section called "Remakes and Sequel".
743:Please add this table to the article
564:Meaning of hindi word dabang/dabangg
420:This article is within the scope of
295:This article is within the scope of
218:
216:
1991:, no indication that the character
235:It is of interest to the following
2813:WikiProject Indian cinema articles
2432:"overseas.Dabangg" - missing space
14:
2778:Indian cinema task force articles
2625:. Please take a moment to review
1089:Critical reception not mentioned.
442:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject India
351:This article is supported by the
41:. If you can improve it further,
2560:
2483:
2454:All done, thanks to Kailash. --
2408:father to the police station" -
1027:it is sucessfull in box office.
511:
407:
397:
370:
327:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Film
311:regional and topical task forces
282:
272:
248:
217:
148:
67:
19:
2773:GA-Class Indian cinema articles
1973:) 04:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC))
1854:
1794:
1287:see a little necessity for it.
994:
462:This article has been rated as
1546:now — all he needs is a cape."
748:
660:21:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
636:13:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
157:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
2793:Low-importance India articles
2758:Media and drama good articles
2753:Knowledge (XXG) good articles
1956:23:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
1753:12:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
1733:20:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
1713:19:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
1600:17:41, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
1581:16:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
1562:15:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
1537:13:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
1505:13:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
1478:10:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
1431:07:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
1412:22:24, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
1384:10:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
1341:22:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
1302:10:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
1282:09:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
1252:08:55, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
1215:16:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
1137:08:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
1110:15:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
713:17:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
484:This article is supported by
33:Media and drama good articles
2739:23:32, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
2230:11:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
2213:09:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
2196:08:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
2179:00:10, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
2165:09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
1759:shooting began for dabangg 2
737:14:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
724:
649:
585:02:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
2602:21:19, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
2582:20:49, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
2555:16:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
2532:16:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
2505:16:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
2470:15:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
2370:18:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
2347:18:22, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
2148:18:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
2122:13:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
2093:04:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
1909:19:39, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
693:06:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
674:15:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
487:the Indian cinema workgroup
178:The text of the entry was:
2839:
2818:WikiProject India articles
2702:(last update: 5 June 2024)
2618:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
2110:Chulbul Pandey (character)
2081:User:Justlettersandnumbers
2079:. Pinging opening poster:
1863:05:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
1839:21:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
1803:06:07, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
1779:18:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
1461:Please remember that this
596:without suggesting a name.
468:project's importance scale
445:Template:WikiProject India
2783:WikiProject Film articles
1884:07:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
1466:prospects at this point.
1454:say it's not "mandatory".
749:
606:09:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
483:
461:
392:
350:
330:Template:WikiProject Film
267:
243:
199:
145:
117:Good article reassessment
65:
61:
2240:Please do not modify it.
2005:15:01, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
1983:14:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
1932:Please do not modify it.
1845:Well, I think its done.
750:Global Box Office Tally
354:Indian cinema task force
2788:GA-Class India articles
2614:External links modified
2155:into parent article. --
2117:aka The Red Pen of Doom
2035:tag to this discussion.
2000:aka The Red Pen of Doom
2768:GA-Class film articles
2400:to nearly 1800 screens
2396:in nearly 1800 cinemas
2392:in nearly 1800 screens
2075:. Pinging AfD closer:
480:
347:
225:This article is rated
180:Did you know ... that
155:fact from this article
2410:along with his father
2069:User:Northamerica1000
1975:Justlettersandnumbers
1184:"many" is subjective.
1050:) 12:30 2 June 2011.
479:
346:
229:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
39:good article criteria
2683:regular verification
2065:User:TheRedPenOfDoom
2057:User:MichaelQSchmidt
1915:Proposed merge with
551:relevant style guide
547:varieties of English
136:Good article nominee
98:Good article nominee
2673:After February 2018
2652:parameter below to
1927:request for comment
1877:25 CENTS VICTORIOUS
1219:Well, first of all
1160:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
549:. According to the
303:join the discussion
2727:InternetArchiveBot
2678:InternetArchiveBot
481:
348:
231:content assessment
172:September 10, 2015
73:Article milestones
2703:
2312:
2311:
2146:
2118:
2053:User:Kailash29792
2017:was contested at
2001:
1954:
1942:Da merge has it.
1899:comment added by
1850:Secret of success
1829:comment added by
1790:Secret of success
1769:comment added by
1678:
1677:
1458:magazine or what?
1044:Secret of success
1025:
1024:
948:Rest of the World
730:
639:
622:comment added by
575:comment added by
561:
560:
506:
505:
502:
501:
498:
497:
423:WikiProject India
365:
364:
361:
360:
305:and see lists of
211:
210:
207:
206:
91:February 26, 2012
57:
2830:
2737:
2728:
2701:
2700:
2679:
2667:
2597:
2591:
2580:
2578:
2571:
2564:
2563:
2550:
2544:
2530:
2528:
2521:
2503:
2501:
2494:
2487:
2486:
2465:
2459:
2426:
2411:
2401:
2397:
2386:
2375:Initial comments
2368:
2366:
2359:
2322:Talk:Dabangg/GA3
2266:Copyvio detector
2254:
2242:
2176:
2138:
2136:
2119:
2116:
2061:User:TheLongTone
2047:Pinging all the
2034:
2028:
2002:
1999:
1948:
1934:
1911:
1879:
1861:
1860:
1851:
1841:
1801:
1800:
1791:
1781:
1751:
1744:
1729:
1688:Talk:Dabangg/GA1
1632:Copyvio detector
1620:
1598:
1591:
1579:
1572:
1558:
1535:
1528:
1503:
1496:
1474:
1429:
1422:
1408:
1382:
1375:
1337:
1300:
1293:
1278:
1250:
1243:
1211:
1135:
1128:
1106:
1040:Taare Zameen Par
769:
747:
732:
731:
726:
655:
654:
638:
616:
587:
518:This article is
515:
508:
450:
449:
446:
443:
440:
417:
412:
411:
410:
401:
394:
393:
388:
385:
374:
367:
335:
334:
331:
328:
325:
298:WikiProject Film
292:
287:
286:
285:
276:
269:
268:
263:
252:
245:
228:
222:
221:
220:
213:
200:Current status:
152:
131:
112:
93:
72:
71:
63:
46:
23:
16:
2838:
2837:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2743:
2742:
2731:
2726:
2694:
2687:have permission
2677:
2661:
2631:this simple FaQ
2616:
2599:
2595:
2589:
2574:
2567:
2565:
2552:
2548:
2542:
2524:
2517:
2515:
2497:
2490:
2488:
2480:
2467:
2463:
2457:
2442:
2377:
2362:
2355:
2353:
2316:This review is
2308:
2280:
2252:
2247:
2238:
2174:
2132:
2114:
2077:User:S Marshall
2032:
2026:
1997:
1930:
1920:
1894:
1891:
1875:
1871:
1849:
1824:
1789:
1764:
1761:
1742:
1723:
1682:This review is
1674:
1646:
1618:
1589:
1570:
1552:
1543:here's the link
1526:
1494:
1468:
1420:
1402:
1373:
1366:undue weightage
1331:
1291:
1272:
1241:
1205:
1126:
1100:
1056:
1036:
1028:
772:(35-day total)
767:
745:
725:
650:
647:for details. —
617:
613:
593:
570:
566:
555:broad consensus
447:
444:
441:
438:
437:
413:
408:
406:
386:
380:
332:
329:
326:
323:
322:
288:
283:
281:
258:
226:
195:
194:
176:
129:August 28, 2015
127:
108:
89:
66:
12:
11:
5:
2836:
2834:
2826:
2825:
2820:
2815:
2810:
2805:
2800:
2795:
2790:
2785:
2780:
2775:
2770:
2765:
2760:
2755:
2745:
2744:
2721:
2720:
2713:
2646:
2645:
2637:Added archive
2615:
2612:
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2605:
2604:
2593:
2546:
2479:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2461:
2449:
2448:
2441:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2433:
2430:
2427:
2421:
2418:
2415:
2412:
2402:
2388:
2381:
2376:
2373:
2351:
2327:
2326:
2310:
2309:
2307:
2306:
2301:
2296:
2290:
2287:
2286:
2282:
2281:
2279:
2278:
2276:External links
2273:
2268:
2262:
2259:
2258:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2245:
2233:
2232:
2215:
2201:Support merge:
2198:
2181:
2167:
2150:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2106:Chulbul Pandey
2102:as a character
2051:participants:
2015:Chulbul Pandey
2007:
1993:as a character
1964:
1962:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1921:
1919:
1917:Chulbul Pandey
1913:
1890:
1889:chulbul pandey
1887:
1870:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1806:
1805:
1760:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1693:
1692:
1676:
1675:
1673:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1656:
1653:
1652:
1648:
1647:
1645:
1644:
1642:External links
1639:
1634:
1628:
1625:
1624:
1617:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1583:
1547:
1507:
1459:
1455:
1444:
1398:
1395:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1322:
1311:
1304:
1268:
1264:
1261:
1258:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1194:
1191:
1188:
1185:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1149:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1068:
1064:
1055:
1052:
1035:
1032:
1026:
1023:
1022:
1019:
1014:
1009:
1004:
999:
993:
992:
989:
984:
979:
974:
969:
967:Overseas Total
963:
962:
959:
956:
954:
951:
949:
945:
944:
941:
938:
935:
932:
929:
925:
924:
921:
918:
915:
912:
909:
905:
904:
901:
898:
895:
892:
890:
886:
885:
882:
877:
872:
867:
862:
860:Domestic Total
856:
855:
852:
849:
846:
843:
841:
837:
836:
833:
830:
827:
824:
822:
818:
817:
814:
811:
808:
805:
803:
799:
798:
795:
792:
789:
786:
784:
780:
779:
776:
773:
771:
765:
762:
759:
756:
752:
751:
744:
741:
740:
739:
716:
715:
696:
695:
679:
678:
677:
676:
612:
609:
592:
589:
577:74.102.161.210
565:
562:
559:
558:
522:Indian English
516:
504:
503:
500:
499:
496:
495:
492:Mid-importance
482:
472:
471:
464:Low-importance
460:
454:
453:
451:
448:India articles
419:
418:
402:
390:
389:
387:Low‑importance
375:
363:
362:
359:
358:
349:
339:
338:
336:
294:
293:
277:
265:
264:
253:
241:
240:
234:
223:
209:
208:
205:
204:
197:
196:
177:
147:
146:
143:
142:
139:
132:
124:
123:
120:
113:
105:
104:
101:
94:
86:
85:
82:
79:
75:
74:
59:
58:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2835:
2824:
2821:
2819:
2816:
2814:
2811:
2809:
2806:
2804:
2801:
2799:
2796:
2794:
2791:
2789:
2786:
2784:
2781:
2779:
2776:
2774:
2771:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2761:
2759:
2756:
2754:
2751:
2750:
2748:
2741:
2740:
2735:
2730:
2729:
2718:
2714:
2711:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2698:
2692:
2688:
2684:
2680:
2674:
2669:
2665:
2659:
2655:
2651:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2619:
2613:
2603:
2600:
2598:
2592:
2585:
2584:
2583:
2579:
2577:
2572:
2570:
2558:
2557:
2556:
2553:
2551:
2545:
2538:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2529:
2527:
2522:
2520:
2513:
2509:
2508:
2507:
2506:
2502:
2500:
2495:
2493:
2477:
2471:
2468:
2466:
2460:
2453:
2452:
2451:
2450:
2447:
2446:No dead links
2444:
2443:
2439:
2434:
2431:
2428:
2422:
2419:
2416:
2413:
2407:
2403:
2393:
2389:
2382:
2379:
2378:
2374:
2372:
2371:
2367:
2365:
2360:
2358:
2349:
2348:
2344:
2341:
2338:
2334:
2331:
2325:
2323:
2319:
2314:
2313:
2305:
2302:
2300:
2297:
2295:
2292:
2291:
2289:
2288:
2283:
2277:
2274:
2272:
2269:
2267:
2264:
2263:
2261:
2260:
2255:
2249:
2244:
2241:
2235:
2234:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2216:
2214:
2210:
2206:
2202:
2199:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2184:Support merge
2182:
2180:
2177:
2171:
2170:Support merge
2168:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2153:Support merge
2151:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2135:
2129:
2123:
2120:
2111:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2045:
2044:
2040:
2031:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2006:
2003:
1994:
1990:
1989:support merge
1987:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1946:
1941:
1940:
1939:
1936:
1933:
1928:
1923:
1922:
1918:
1914:
1912:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1888:
1886:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1878:
1868:
1864:
1858:
1853:
1852:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1821:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1811:
1810:
1804:
1798:
1793:
1792:
1784:
1783:
1782:
1780:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1749:
1746:
1745:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1728:
1727:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1700:
1697:
1691:
1689:
1685:
1680:
1679:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1657:
1655:
1654:
1649:
1643:
1640:
1638:
1635:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1627:
1626:
1621:
1615:
1601:
1597:
1596:
1593:
1592:
1584:
1582:
1578:
1577:
1574:
1573:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1557:
1556:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1529:
1521:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1506:
1502:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1479:
1475:
1473:
1472:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1453:
1450:, which does
1449:
1445:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1424:
1423:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1409:
1407:
1406:
1399:
1396:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1381:
1380:
1377:
1376:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1342:
1338:
1336:
1335:
1327:
1323:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1307:
1305:
1303:
1299:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1279:
1277:
1276:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1210:
1209:
1202:
1195:
1192:
1189:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1161:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1121:
1120:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1105:
1104:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1072:
1069:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1053:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1033:
1031:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1013:
1010:
1008:
1005:
1003:
1000:
998:
995:
990:
988:
985:
983:
980:
978:
975:
973:
970:
968:
965:
964:
960:
957:
955:
952:
950:
947:
946:
942:
939:
936:
933:
930:
927:
926:
922:
919:
916:
913:
910:
907:
906:
902:
899:
896:
893:
891:
888:
887:
883:
881:
878:
876:
873:
871:
868:
866:
863:
861:
858:
857:
853:
850:
847:
844:
842:
840:Rest of India
839:
838:
834:
831:
828:
825:
823:
820:
819:
815:
812:
809:
806:
804:
801:
800:
796:
793:
790:
787:
785:
782:
781:
777:
774:
763:
760:
757:
754:
742:
738:
735:
733:
729:
721:
720:User:Halemane
718:
717:
714:
710:
706:
702:
699:I agree with
698:
697:
694:
690:
686:
681:
680:
675:
671:
667:
666:84.196.55.232
663:
662:
661:
658:
656:
653:
646:
642:
641:
640:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
610:
608:
607:
603:
599:
590:
588:
586:
582:
578:
574:
563:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
523:
517:
514:
510:
509:
493:
490:(assessed as
489:
488:
478:
474:
473:
469:
465:
459:
456:
455:
452:
435:
434:
429:
425:
424:
416:
405:
403:
400:
396:
395:
391:
384:
379:
376:
373:
369:
356:
355:
345:
341:
340:
337:
333:film articles
320:
316:
315:documentation
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
291:
280:
278:
275:
271:
270:
266:
262:
257:
254:
251:
247:
242:
238:
232:
224:
215:
214:
203:
198:
193:
191:
186:
185:
181:
174:
173:
168:
166:
165:Did you know?
160:
156:
151:
144:
140:
138:
137:
133:
130:
126:
125:
121:
119:
118:
114:
111:
110:July 18, 2015
107:
106:
102:
100:
99:
95:
92:
88:
87:
83:
80:
77:
76:
70:
64:
60:
55:
53:
52:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
2725:
2722:
2697:source check
2676:
2670:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2647:
2620:
2617:
2587:
2575:
2568:
2540:
2525:
2518:
2498:
2491:
2481:
2455:
2405:
2391:
2363:
2356:
2350:
2339:
2329:
2328:
2315:
2304:Instructions
2239:
2236:
2217:
2205:Kailash29792
2200:
2183:
2175:AlbinoFerret
2169:
2152:
2133:
2101:
2046:
2042:
2036:
1992:
1988:
1963:
1943:
1938:
1931:
1924:
1901:82.12.221.52
1895:— Preceding
1892:
1876:
1872:
1848:
1825:— Preceding
1822:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1788:
1765:— Preceding
1762:
1748:
1741:
1725:
1724:
1716:
1705:
1695:
1694:
1681:
1670:Instructions
1595:
1588:
1576:
1569:
1554:
1553:
1532:
1525:
1519:
1514:
1500:
1493:
1487:
1470:
1469:
1462:
1451:
1426:
1419:
1404:
1403:
1391:
1379:
1372:
1355:
1333:
1332:
1297:
1290:
1274:
1273:
1247:
1240:
1225:
1207:
1206:
1132:
1125:
1117:
1102:
1101:
1098:More later.
1097:
1057:
1037:
1029:
1016:
1011:
1006:
1001:
997:Global Total
996:
986:
981:
976:
971:
966:
879:
874:
869:
864:
859:
727:
651:
614:
594:
567:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
519:
485:
463:
433:project page
431:
421:
415:India portal
352:
296:
237:WikiProjects
202:Good article
201:
187:
182:
179:
170:
162:
134:
115:
96:
49:
47:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
2664:Sourcecheck
2318:transcluded
2157:Rsrikanth05
1831:94.5.218.68
1771:94.5.218.68
1684:transcluded
1358:GA criteria
1235:GA criteria
821:East Punjab
778:Trade Note
618:—Preceding
571:—Preceding
520:written in
290:Film portal
2747:Categories
2734:Report bug
2440:References
2271:Authorship
2257:GA toolbox
2134:S Marshall
2073:User:Xania
1869:Audio File
1637:Authorship
1623:GA toolbox
1511:WP:CITEHOW
1448:WP:CITEHOW
1392:No Smoking
1221:WP:CITEHOW
1146:WP:CITEHOW
802:Delhi / UP
755:Territory
728:Managerarc
652:Managerarc
645:WP:PLOTSUM
319:guidelines
307:open tasks
169:column on
37:under the
2717:this tool
2710:this tool
2330:Reviewer:
2294:Templates
2285:Reviewing
2250:GA Review
2222:The Gnome
2021:. I have
1696:Reviewer:
1660:Templates
1651:Reviewing
1616:GA Review
1515:typically
1155:the link.
761:Screen %
624:Sansari13
598:Viswamchn
531:travelled
159:Main Page
2723:Cheers.—
2343:contribs
2299:Criteria
2188:Haminoon
2023:restored
2011:redirect
1897:unsigned
1827:unsigned
1767:unsigned
1709:contribs
1699:Shshshsh
1665:Criteria
1484:WP:SYNTH
1441:WP:SYNTH
1437:WP:UNDUE
1315:WP:UNDUE
1054:Comments
775:Gross %
758:Screens
705:Halemane
632:contribs
620:unsigned
573:unsigned
539:analysed
227:GA-class
122:Delisted
51:reassess
2650:checked
2627:my edit
2623:Dabangg
2590:Frankie
2543:Frankie
2478:On hold
2458:Frankie
2406:and his
2043:neutral
1319:WP:CRIT
701:V2Blast
685:V2Blast
543:defence
466:on the
188:is the
184:Dabangg
161:in the
81:Process
27:Dabangg
2658:failed
2537:Jaguar
2512:FrB.TG
2510:Sorry
2333:Jaguar
2115:TRPoD
2085:Cunard
2071:, and
1998:TRPoD
1967:Cunard
1726:Shahid
1555:Shahid
1520:should
1471:Shahid
1405:Shahid
1362:WP:GNG
1334:Shahid
1275:Shahid
1208:Shahid
1153:Here's
1119:Ra.One
1103:Shahid
783:Mumbai
770:crore)
535:centre
527:colour
383:Cinema
261:Indian
233:scale.
141:Listed
103:Listed
84:Result
2320:from
2218:Merge
1951:Help!
1743:X.One
1686:from
1590:X.One
1571:X.One
1527:X.One
1495:X.One
1421:X.One
1374:X.One
1292:X.One
1242:X.One
1127:X.One
1002:1,800
875:141.4
865:1,400
764:Gross
439:India
428:India
378:India
2654:true
2596:talk
2549:talk
2464:talk
2337:talk
2226:talk
2209:talk
2192:talk
2161:talk
2089:talk
2009:The
1979:talk
1971:talk
1905:talk
1857:talk
1835:talk
1797:talk
1775:talk
1719:here
1703:talk
1509:And
1326:here
1226:main
1048:Talk
1017:100%
1007:100%
987:100%
977:100%
961:Hit
943:Hit
923:Hit
903:Hit
880:100%
870:100%
854:Hit
848:47.6
835:Hit
829:13.8
816:Hit
810:30.5
797:Hit
791:49.5
709:talk
689:talk
670:talk
628:talk
611:Plot
602:talk
581:talk
324:Film
309:and
256:Film
78:Date
2691:RfC
2668:).
2656:or
2641:to
2576:UAR
2569:JAG
2526:UAR
2519:JAG
2499:UAR
2492:JAG
2398:or
2364:UAR
2357:JAG
2030:rfc
2013:of
1945:Guy
1731:•
1560:•
1476:•
1463:may
1452:not
1410:•
1339:•
1280:•
1213:•
1108:•
972:400
908:USA
889:UAE
851:34%
832:10%
813:21%
794:35%
458:Low
2749::
2704:.
2699:}}
2695:{{
2666:}}
2662:{{
2345:)
2228:)
2211:)
2194:)
2163:)
2091:)
2083:.
2067:,
2063:,
2059:,
2055:,
2033:}}
2027:{{
1981:)
1929:.
1907:)
1837:)
1777:)
1711:)
1231:GA
1042:?
1021:-
991:-
931:41
928:UK
911:62
884:-
711:)
691:)
683:--
672:)
634:)
630:•
604:)
583:)
541:,
537:,
533:,
529:,
494:).
381::
259::
153:A
54:it
45:.
2736:)
2732:(
2719:.
2712:.
2340:·
2335:(
2224:(
2207:(
2190:(
2159:(
2144:C
2142:/
2140:T
2087:(
1977:(
1969:(
1953:)
1949:(
1903:(
1859:)
1855:(
1833:(
1799:)
1795:(
1773:(
1706:·
1701:(
1443:.
1148:.
1046:(
1012:0
982:0
958:%
953:%
940:%
937:2
934:%
920:%
917:3
914:%
900:%
897:5
894:%
845:%
826:%
807:%
788:%
768:â‚ą
766:(
707:(
687:(
668:(
626:(
600:(
579:(
557:.
470:.
436:.
357:.
321:.
239::
192:?
175:.
167:"
163:"
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
