42:
203:
There were some problems with short paragraphs, and odd sections about twitter. I took the liberty of doing some copyediting myself in the capacity as the good article reviewer. With these improvements the quality is better and the article is good. They were minor copyedits here and there
262:
As the initiator, one of the further editors, and nominator, thank you, most helpful. Noted re. keeping paragraphs more robust, and the copyediting - and special thanks re. Twitter, I had my own questions there, and this is clarified. I am chasing an image but no luck yet.
232:
Please keep out the thing about twitter as that is unencyclopedic. Otherwise, stability looks good. I looked through the article talk page and I'm seeing polite back and forth to improve the article together.
216:
Covers all major aspects of the person's life and career. I like the early life and education and the personal life. I really like the list of publications, that is great and very encyclopedic.
80:
210:
Every fact in the article is cited to reliable sources. These include news media, newspaper sources, academic sources, education sites, and journal articles.
70:
47:
238:
No images used. Therefore, meets the good article criteria by default. Consider trying to obtain a free use image. Not required. Good job overall.
126:
244:
222:
The wording style comes across to the reader in a neutral tone. The writing style is matter-of-fact and clear cut. The article meets
122:
52:
156:
193:
107:
75:
99:
181:
252:
170:
150:
247:. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.—
192:
status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of
November 16, 2020, compares against the
115:
17:
248:
166:
146:
268:
223:
189:
92:
264:
272:
256:
174:
160:
243:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it
134:
103:
188:
I am glad to report that this article nomination for
8:
30:
61:
33:
7:
24:
1:
273:22:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
257:20:28, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
175:01:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
161:01:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
289:
220:4. Neutral point of view?:
194:six good article criteria
165:I'll read this one over.
245:Good article reassessed
214:3. Broad in coverage?:
201:1. Well written?:
89:
88:
280:
139:
130:
111:
43:Copyvio detector
31:
18:Talk:Daire Keogh
288:
287:
283:
282:
281:
279:
278:
277:
208:2. Verifiable?:
186:
120:
97:
91:
85:
57:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
286:
284:
276:
275:
242:
240:
239:
233:
227:
217:
211:
205:
185:
178:
140:
87:
86:
84:
83:
78:
73:
67:
64:
63:
59:
58:
56:
55:
53:External links
50:
45:
39:
36:
35:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
285:
274:
270:
266:
261:
260:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
237:
234:
231:
228:
225:
221:
218:
215:
212:
209:
206:
202:
199:
198:
197:
195:
191:
183:
179:
177:
176:
172:
168:
163:
162:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:
133:
128:
124:
119:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
96:
95:
82:
79:
77:
74:
72:
69:
68:
66:
65:
60:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
38:
37:
32:
26:
19:
241:
235:
229:
219:
213:
207:
200:
190:good article
187:
182:good article
164:
153:
143:
142:
135:
131:
117:Article talk
116:
112:
93:
90:
81:Instructions
236:6. Images?:
180:Successful
104:visual edit
249:Right cite
230:5. Stable?
184:nomination
167:Right cite
147:Right cite
48:Authorship
34:GA toolbox
144:Reviewer:
71:Templates
62:Reviewing
27:GA Review
204:anyways.
157:contribs
76:Criteria
224:WP:NPOV
127:history
108:history
94:Article
136:Watch
16:<
269:talk
265:SeoR
253:talk
171:talk
151:talk
123:edit
100:edit
271:)
255:)
196::
173:)
159:)
125:|
106:|
102:|
267:(
251:(
226:.
169:(
154:·
149:(
132:·
129:)
121:(
113:·
110:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.