Knowledge

Talk:Devil in Christianity/GA1

Source 📝

1643:
work under Satan for the moral ruin of man and they are permitted to work till the Judgment without hindrance. But in the Similitudes, Secs. 37-70, the author has a more comprehensive world-view; he traces evil farther back, responsibility lies at the door of the Satans (40:7). The guilt of the watchers was not due to simple lust, it was yielding to the Satans (54:6). That is to say, in this section of Enoch the origin of sin is traced back to the Satans. Other angels and men were misled by them, yet a Persian dualism does not seem implied, for the Satans are subject to the Lord of spirits. The Satans still appear in heaven, as in the Book of Job, though they do not always seem welcome (40:7). The functions of the Satans and the fallen angels are sometimes confused, as in 69:4 f. Their office is threefold: (i) They tempt to evil, through lustful suggestion, evil counsel, teaching men war and its weapons. (2) They accuse the fallen (40:7); Faunel, an angel of the presence, acts as a check on the Satans in this sinister work. (3) They, as angels of punishment, punished the condemned. For their purpose they used scourges and chains of iron and bronze and other "instruments of Satan"." ("The Doctrine of Satan: II. Satan in Extra-Biblical Apocalyptical Literature") This is also the source I used after the colons. I thought it is enough, when the colons are introduced to explain the aforementioned statement. Should I add the source before the colons?--
1463:
merely an angels with some sinister tasks. 2) Belial is some sort of personified evil, pretty much a devil, until the times of the New Testament (in Qumram a spirit, in the Old Testament merely an abstraction). I think this is that Theobold states too. I wonna give a short translation here: "Satan and Belial, both old-testamental roots of early-jewish/proto-christian concept of the devil, are diametrically opposed entities. The old-testamental Satan is on side with God and fights for keeping up God's laws and order. He roams he earth to punish human's offenses against God's law and even distrusts humans, when he doesn't find any flaws in them. Belial on the other hand, starts as a force of Death and Chaos, and statnds outside of God's order. The term is used in the Old Testament as an abstraction and stands for everything what is against God and humans living together. One could say, it is this
2612:
to what wasn't there. As far as I can tell, there is no protocol for abandoned reviews that have been picked up by a different reviewer. I asked Shushugah to remove their name as reviewer, since they had passed the baton to me, but they never did. You and I know it was abandoned, but as far as the bot was concerned, they remained the listed reviewer. Anything I did would have been erased by the almighty bot - again. Shushugah responded promptly when notified the review was done, and I appreciated that. The article passed, and deservedly so. I did the work.
410: 343: 333: 320: 307: 294: 284: 266: 252: 238: 224: 211: 198: 361: 785:"The Satan" appears 17 times but allusion to the idea of the devil is present in more than two books. Ezekiel 28:12-19 references a "fallen angel" as an example of what happens to those who think too highly of themselves; Isaiah 14:12-17, and more in Isaiah, Habakuk, and 1 Chronicles. I don't see this in the Lucifer section, so what do you think about adding a sentence here? 2283:] It says there are violations, and that's a must-fail. If they are yours, those must be fixed before any GA can be approved. You can quote, though large blocks are discouraged, or cite the web and paraphrase, but you cannot quote w/o citing. If these are not yours, we will need to post a reverse-violation tag on this article. I can go no further until these are fixed. 42: 2590: 2129: 2055: 1811: 1797: 1779: 1765: 1751: 1737: 1723: 1387: 1360: 1308: 1214: 1104: 1091: 1012: 996: 896: 776: 760: 700: 398: 385: 892:* Lots of little sections are distracting to the reader and often don't show up on a telephone at all, and since a lot of WP readers use their phones, that's problematic. You might want to consider removing the next three section headings entirely and folding their content into "Satan in the Old Testament". 611:
Shemyaza more often, but, as stated above, both are valid). Regarding the section about Samuel, I am not entirely sure, but concluding from the GA review Box, I assume this section was suspected of original research, so I added a reference. Also changed "around" to "circa", using the proper template.--
2517:
since they never changed it to me and are still listed as the reviewer. If we don'r hear back from them within a day, I will go through getting the article declared as abandoned and me as the reviewer and I will pass it. One way or the other, you should have your GA status before the end of the week.
1865:
My eye hurts tonight so I am not doing much, but I will say that if you are sure those sentences are covered by an existing citation, yet it doesn't seem clear to the other editor, just copy them and add them at the end of the questioned sentence. They'll be happy, and it won't be much extra work for
1252:
I wondered if it might be pertinent to add a short explanation along with that lone sentence. Perhaps a reference to the fullest biblical explanation of Satan not appearing until the final book of the New Testament, the book of Revelation – whose provenance is disputed - especially since you refer to
2611:
I tried three different ways to indicate on the GA1 review page, at the GA listing site, and on the article talk page, that I was doing the review, and couldn't. The bot kept erasing everything I did. Since no tag for requesting a second opinion was ever posted, I could not post that I had responded
2375:
Thanks for checking in. Take all the time you need. Death of a beloved one is something what gets people down. This is just natural. We don't even get paid for Knowledge (or do you? if yes tell me), so it is voluntary work. You explained the situation, you need time to recover from your lose, I will
2313:
The webpage with 79% similarity seems to be copied from Knowledge to explain their profile (the devil in that case). This happens often. Instead of writing an introduction on their own, they simply copy Knowledge. The differences seem to be, before the article was changed during its reviews. So yeh,
655:
I understand you have asked for a second opinion. I am Jenhawk777. I write exclusively on religion and philosophy as those are my undergrad degrees, and I have some grad school in philosophy in the field of ethics. A glance at this article tells me a lot of quality work has gone into this. It's both
573:
Ahh, I didn't read that signature carefully. I thought that was you. So you don't really need me at all, you're doing fine, but I am terrifically interested in this article, so I may do a few small edits here and there. In answer to your questions above, Shemyaza and Samyaza are both used, so either
2497:
I have gone through it all at least once, some of it twice, and will go through the rest a second time, but I am not finding much to trouble with. I have made a few minor changes to grammar, but otherwise, there is nothing much left. I'll take another day or two to finish up and will then give the
2446:
thank you! I have checked to be sure that I have the power to pass this when we are done and have been told I can. I have read through the remainder of the article and have almost no comments, but one of those comments is a request for an addition: you have a section on evangelical Protestant views
1893:
I am stopping for now as I see that most of these changes have not been made. You are overwhelmed with too much to do, I understand. Let me know when, and if, you would like me to come back to it. I cannot support this article for GA as it stands, but I do believe it can get there. There is nothing
1642:
This is a quote from the source I was refering to: "These offenders were punished with imprisonment. Azazel, the leader and chief offender, received especially severe punishment. But the children of the fallen angels and the human mothers are giants and their disembodied spirits are the demons that
925:
I know, I always feel that way too. They organize everything so neatly! I would think they would make it easier to find what you are looking for, but my last GAR had me remove all of mine because he couldn't see them on his phone and 2 out of 5 people - according to him - use WP on their phones. If
534:
and I specialize in articles on religion. I was looking at the "remove the backlog" at GA and saw your disclaimer on how much you are able to work on this article and I thought I would volunteer to help out. This is an incredible article - but long - so if you would like any assistance, just let me
2215:
I made some very minor changes, and there is one citation issue here as well. I know that what you have written is correct, but it does need a citation anyway, especially since it is in wiki-voice. This section is also excellent. The changes I made were very minor, and since I know you are busy in
1917:
I think we have resolved all issues so far and are both caught up to the same place now, (Augustine) so if you are interested in having me finish this, I will. I will tell you that in RL right now, I am under some stress. My mother is in the hospital and not doing well. I should be able to work on
1043:
is technically inaccurate. Satan never asks to torture Job. He asks to test his faith, to prove that Job is only a "fair-weather-friend". God consents to temporarily removing his blessing and protection, and the implication is that God has faith in Job. Interesting huh? Torture is never mentioned.
837:
The sâ'îr and shêd are, however, conceptually different than "the Devil" or "Satan". They are more nature spirits or demons of the wilderness. One might identify them with "lesser devils", but are, as far as I am aware of, not an image of "The Devil". When talking about the "demonic" or demons in
1462:
I don't see a contradiction between the sources. Maybe you could help and pointing it out directly? Maybe I expressed myself badly in the article, but Theobald seems to be in accordance with most statements. The claims usually made are: 1) In the Old Testament, Satan is not the enemy of God, but
610:
I now tried to edit some issues ("vague"-tags and "citation needed"-tags) and solved the problems listed above. Some did other users already (thank you very much), like "monasticism" or clarifying that the angel accopaning Azazel ccan be spelled both Samyaza or Shemyaza (I personally encountered
2472:
I have spent all my time online the last few days looking up sources to get rid of those dang citation needed tags. I hate those things. They are gone now. I hope to find no more! I will get back to the remainder of the review Sunday night. Easter weekend is busy. Hope you have a good weekend!
2360:
I'm so sorry about this delay, and if you want to see if you can get someone else to finish, I understand, but I am hoping you won't give up on me. I think it will be one more week, maybe even a little less. I am emotionally and physically exhausted and looking forward to being home soon - and
1562:
refers to an angel who says to Balaam, "I came here to oppose you because your way is evil in my eyes." This satan, (without the definite article), is a being that is not necessarily evil. This is a messenger, one of God's obedient servants, an adversary sent for the purpose of blocking human
2266:
Well good then, because I have done some up through Charismatic movements. These sections have all been well done and this is going very quickly now. I am going to run the copyright check when I am finished. I may have found a site that has copied from you, but we can deal with that.
1839:
Uh, hope your surgery is fine. Don't push yourself too much. I see someone made a few citation requests. Most of them are claims followed the source mentioned a sentence previously. However, this will take some time, and this is a really busy week. But I have this in
2412:
I am finally home after over a month of clearing out my mother's house. It's been sad and exhausting and I am glad to be home and back at work on WP. It is late, so I will begin tomorrow. Thank you for being so understanding. Hopefully this will finish up quickly.
1937:
Don't push yourself too much. We are both busy and might miss some days. I would be happy if you finish this. But I am completly fine if you miss out some days. I cannot promise I keep up everyday either. I try, but sometimes it doesn't work. Hope your mother will
2233:
Your minor edits are welcome and I really appreciate them. It is much easier to edit minor mistakes or improvements straight forward. I think I put the source in the end of the paragraph, but since they are split this doesn't ofc. I added the requested citation.
1397:
However, the role of Belial is in opposition to that of Satan: while Belial, representing chaos and death, stands outside of God's cosmos, Satan roams the earth, fighting for the maintenance of the divine order and punishing precisely everything Belial stands
1484:
Thanx for the ping! I've been hoping to hear from you. This is an excellent paragraph, but what's in the article is not this clear. Perhaps the summary is too brief. If you want to keep this, I would like to see you add this whole paragraph, with the
1175:
I am sorry, I missed that point. I think it was rather a summary about how Satan tests Job. But yes, according to Kelly, Satan aks God to test Job, so it is not Satan causing misery, Satan "influences" God to cause disaster. Haven't noticed that.
792:
Not sure if I get what you mean. Ezekiel is under the "Identified with the Devil" header. I remember removing some references to Satan, like 1 Chronicles, because there haven't been much of secondary sources mentioning them. I thought they aren't
1355:
this will be confusing for the average reader. If you want to give his name in the original languages, begin with the common name first: "Jerome, or Saint Jerome, (Latin: Eusebius Sophronius Hieronymus; Greek: Εὐσέβιος Σωφρόνιος Ἱερώνυμος)"...
2314:
they copied the Knowledge article. I don't understand how exaclty we have to procced from now on. Before we finish, I remeber there are some request tags in the article, and I would like to rewrite the lead section. it is a little bit short.--
2328:
Put a backwards copy violation tag near the top of the Talk page. Fill it out with the relevant data as much as you can. I'll be back as soon as I am able. My mother died and we have to close up her house and it's all been very difficult.
2571:
for further information. Jenhawk777, no need to consult Shushugah at this point; they abandoned the review, and you took over. The decision to pass or fail or request further changes is entirely up to you. Thanks for taking this one on!
748:
This sentence is too long. Divide it. I suggest ending the first sentence after adversary and beginning the second sentence with "The term is used... That makes the third sentence begin with a repetition, so just change "The word" to
1400:
You'll have to offer some real defense for this one. My Deutsch isn't good enough to decipher the full meaning of the text in the book you reference, but in any case, this claim is seemingly contradicted by your other source. Kelly's
756:. Try: "When satan is used without a definite article, it refers to any accuser, but "the Satan" (Ha-Satan), with a definite article, usually refers to the heavenly accuser. (Pick usually or specifically, both aren't necessary.) 1546:
In the first place, this is uncited, and in the second place, it is decidedly confused. The only source I can find that in any way comes even a little bit close is and Pagels explains it quite differently than you have
1117:
This is a really interesting info, but I think it might be out of place. It could be helpful if proper context is provided, like "Satan is arguably from non-Jewish origin", but this would probably more important for the
1207:
Since the satan is sent by the will of God, his function resembles less the devilish enemy of God, and even if it is accepted that this satan refers to a supernatural agent, it is not necessarily implied this is the
753:
When it is used without the definite article (simply satan), the word can refer to any accuser, but when it is used with the definite article (Ha-Satan), it usually refers specifically to the heavenly accuser: "The
2175:
Hi all, just two minor citation issues, the refs for Holden (176) and Campo (6) to not correspond to any items in the bibliography—I'm assuming the full citations are missing. Bravo on the article thus far! Best
574:
is correct, which should probably be added, and the correct spelling is monasticism. Monism is a type of philosophy. If I get in the way, just tell me to piss off, and I will, no offense taken. Happy editing!
2146:
Thanks, hope many people will enjoy and benefit from it. I also like the way it turns out. And since it is such a central topic on religio, I would like to have it GA so much. Hope all the best for your
1585:
and is part of the history of the development of the concept, but it isn't about intertestimental texts, it's about the early Hebrew. If you want to keep this, it should be moved up to Satan in the OT.
1324:
I don't think it is necessary, since it becomes clear when reading through the sections. But I added this nontheless, making this exposition of Satan as the devil not earlier than the Book of Revelation
656:
impressive and quite fascinating. I will do a section at a time, if that works for you. I'll focus primarily on prose but I will also check content and do the occasional reference check as I go through.
2447:
but no other, and I think that you need a fuller spectrum of what the various Protestant views are. They vary quite a bit. I hope you can see fit to add that in. I can help if you like. Let me know.
1966:
I have no trouble with it if it takes a little longer. I waited several months until it got reviewed, so I have no trouble if it takes a little bit longer. I cannot check everyday either, now.--
832:
The trouble here is that there are two other words also used for "devils" and demons – sâ'îr and shêd – in Zechariah, Isaiah, Job, Habakuk, 1 and 2 Chronicles, Leviticus, Deuteronomy and Psalms.
962:
No problem. I waited for about 4 months I guess. And proofreading can take time. Maybe delay would even be partly my fault, since this will be a busy week to me. But I am sure, we make it.--
1674:
as far as I remember, you mentioned a lack of source. Maybe I put it on the wrong place. I think I corrected that. But just in case, I quoted the part supporting my claim in the article.--
413:
Reliable sources are by and large used, however there is one failed verification (a nuanced one) and 4 citations missing tags, that definitely need to be addressed for this to pass.
47: 926:
you want your article accessible to those people, make few sections under other sections. Otherwise there is nothing wrong with them and you may, of course, do as you please.
1523:
If I didn't comment on something, that means I thought it was good. :-) I'll be back tomorrow. With a little diligence we should be able to finish this in a week easy peasy.
1415:
Tucker, Paavo. "Reconsidering Bελιάρ: 2 Corinthians 6: 15 in Its Anti-imperial Jewish Apocalyptic Context." Journal for the Study of Paul and his Letters 4.2 (2014): 169-185.
1411:
Dimant, Devorah. "Between Qumran Sectarian and Non-Sectarian Texts: The Case of Belial and Mastema." The Dead Sea Scrolls and Contemporary Culture. Brill, 2011. 235-256.
1467:
behavior, Satan is looking to accuse before God." (page 34) Tell me if this helps. I think this is an important point and I would like to keep it within the article.--
2630:
Oh sorry, didn't know that they aren't allowed to. THought it kind of goes hand in hand. Haven't read the condictions much yesterday, and didn't remembered the rule.
1994:
I ended up rewording some of the theology myself, w/citation. Augustine can be difficult. I hope that's okay. If you don't like it, feel free to rephrase yourself.
80: 2216:
real life, I didn't even think them worth mentioning and just did them. If that's not okay, again, there will be no problems if you go back and do something else.
126: 2125:
I am flying out tomorrow to the hospital and don't know if I will be back tomorrow or not, but at this rate, I will be done soon. I really do like your article!
670:
The lead should be a summary of the content of the article, and this one's a little thin, especially for such a long article with so much substantive content.
1866:
you. If you are too busy, would you like me to hold off on adding anything more here for a bit? I can go as fast or as slowly as you like. Just let me know.
70: 122: 2546:
Would you mind to review the hooks for DYN nominations by the way? I think this goes fast, and is always a good way to celebrate a successful GA Nominee.
405:
The prose style is well written as a whole, in a neutral and comprehensive manner. Most Christian denominations are covered and written in a balanced way.
1087:
Add in that all his sons and daughters were also killed, and then Job's health, but that the story says he got back double what he had lost in the end.
52: 1590:
angels of punishment are depicted in Enoch as acting to carry out punishments only after death and sentence in the heavenly court has been determined.
107: 1544:... Satan and his angels are clearly in the service of God, akin to Satan in the Book of Job. Satan and his lesser satans act as God's executioners: 1228:
Some parts of the Bible, which do not originally refer to an evil spirit or Satan, have been retrospectively interpreted as references to the devil.
1100:
I don't know if you might want to add this or not, but Job is considered to be the oldest book in the Bible and has evidence of non-Jewish origins.
696:
I am glad to hear from you! If and when you have responded to any of my suggestions, I would appreciate it if you would mark them with the template
2616:
did the work. The article gets the glory. That's what matters after all. We contributed to raising the quality of the encyclopedia. It's all good.
1558:
to characterize fellow Israelites as dangerous adversaries they struggled against. Elaine H. Pagels writes that the story of Balaam in the book of
874:
translated as Sata, devil, accuser etc., not about any concept of devils or demons. I may check it up again, the upcomming days, if you wish.--
557:. Nonetheless, it's a very complex/technical article, so your feedback on this review and or the article itself is very much appreciated! ~ 🦝 99: 1008:
Not exactly. Satan replies by pointing out how God has blessed Job – “Does Job fear God for nothing?" – take that away and he will curse you.
1894:
that says every article must go GA, however, so if you've changed your mind, that is perfectly ok too. Ping me if and when you want me back.
665:
While the devil played for most scholars no significant role in the Modern Era, he became more important in contemporary Christianity again.
1619:
Caldwell, William (1913). "The Doctrine of Satan: II. Satan in Extra-Biblical Apocalyptical Literature". The Biblical World. 41 (2): 98–102
707:. It makes it easier for me to keep track. I note that you have posted reasons for not agreeing and that is certainly acceptable as well. 553:
I'm a little confused which disclaim you're referring to. The disclaimer about limited time was from the person who nominated the article
1821:
I am having eye surgery early in the morning and may not get back here tomorrow at all, but I promise I will be back within a day or so.
1407:
One of the most salient figures to emerge from the Qumran scrolls is the archdemon Belial, leader of the forces of darkness.
838:
general, I would agree, but since this is pretty much about Satan&Devil, I don't think we need to consider the shedim and se'irim.--
1281: 1952:
Then I will do my very best for you with the understanding that it may be hit or miss for awhile. Thank you for the good wishes.
156: 509:
Looking forward to your feedback and as long as you're actively working on it, happy to wait a bit longer before deciding. ~ 🦝
188: 75: 444:
In 1 Samuel 2:12, the sons of Eli are called belial for not recognizing Yahweh and therefore violating sacrifice rituals
1006:
Satan replies by urging God to let him torture Job, promising that Job will abandon his faith at the first tribulation
2343:
I am sorry to read that. Take all the time you need, and thank for your ongoing support despite the circumstances.
594:
I am sorry for the delay, was not online for 7 days (or even longer). I will look for all the issues from now on.--
115: 17: 2635: 2551: 2537: 2433: 2381: 2348: 2319: 2239: 2198: 2152: 2089: 1971: 1943: 1845: 1679: 1648: 1504: 1472: 1446: 1330: 1181: 1131: 1067: 1030: 967: 953: 912: 879: 843: 798: 732: 616: 599: 667:
Sentence structure is awkward. I'd put 'For most scholars' at the front, and the second half needs explaining.
1918:
this once a day or so - it will provide a good distraction - but it is also possible I may miss a day or two.
1062:
sadistic in Job. I rewrote the sentence, because on a second thought, it didn't appealed to me anymore too.--
2577: 636: 92: 2594:
And you are most welcome. You must have despaired at times, but you hung in there. I appreciate that.
2631: 2621: 2613: 2599: 2567:, GA reviewers are specifically prohibited from reviewing a subsequent DYK for the same article, see 2560: 2547: 2533: 2523: 2503: 2478: 2469: 2452: 2429: 2418: 2377: 2366: 2357: 2344: 2334: 2315: 2288: 2272: 2256: 2235: 2221: 2194: 2148: 2137: 2109: 2085: 2074: 2045: 2018: 1999: 1967: 1957: 1939: 1923: 1914: 1899: 1890: 1871: 1862: 1841: 1826: 1675: 1665: 1657: 1644: 1630: 1528: 1500: 1490: 1481: 1468: 1442: 1426: 1377: 1326: 1298: 1235: 1177: 1166: 1154: 1145: 1127: 1063: 1049: 1026: 963: 949: 931: 908: 875: 861: 839: 818: 794: 728: 712: 693: 675: 652: 612: 595: 579: 554: 540: 425: 150: 1135: 1441:
I wonna have a look at this on another day. I think I need more time to recheck the sources here.--
992:"God asks Satan where he has been. Satan replies, roaming the earth." Keep it simple when you can. 562: 514: 1034: 477:
Shemyaza is unusual spelling should be Samyaza maybe? I cannot easily verify what the source says
449: 531: 173: 990:
God asks one of them, Satan, where he has been, to which he replies that he has been roaming...
458:
It took me a few seconds to figure what "around NUMBER" was referring to, I'd replace the term
2422: 1583:
When it is used without the definite article (simply satan), the word can refer to any accuser
1278: 948:
I think Knowledge is better used on PC anyways. But yes, it should be readable for everyone.--
2608: 2573: 632: 1405:
on page 41 in the footnote about Watson, and on pages 19, 36, 44, 50-51. There's also this
830:
The word without the definite article is .. Book of Numbers, 1 & 2 Samuel and 1 Kings).
2617: 2595: 2568: 2564: 2519: 2499: 2474: 2448: 2414: 2362: 2330: 2284: 2268: 2217: 2181: 2133: 2105: 2070: 2041: 2014: 1995: 1953: 1919: 1895: 1867: 1822: 1661: 1626: 1524: 1486: 1457: 1422: 1373: 1294: 1231: 1162: 1141: 1045: 927: 857: 814: 708: 671: 575: 550: 536: 448:
In 1 Samuel 2:12, the sons of Eli are called belial for not recognizing Yahweh during the
421: 146: 2193:
Thank you very much for both your kind words as well as pointing out the missing books!--
1159:
Satan requests God to test him and to let him torture Job, so Job would abandon his faith
2514: 1085:
God consents; Satan destroys Job's servants and flocks, yet Job refuses to condemn God.
1025:
Not sure what exactly is objectable. I rewrote the sentence, hope this is better now.--
628: 558: 527: 510: 484:
eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil from the forbidden tree,
466: 355: 301: 2639: 2625: 2603: 2581: 2555: 2541: 2527: 2507: 2482: 2456: 2437: 2385: 2370: 2352: 2338: 2323: 2292: 2276: 2243: 2225: 2202: 2185: 2156: 2141: 2113: 2093: 2078: 2049: 2022: 2003: 1975: 1961: 1947: 1927: 1903: 1875: 1849: 1830: 1683: 1669: 1652: 1634: 1532: 1508: 1494: 1476: 1450: 1430: 1381: 1334: 1302: 1239: 1185: 1170: 1149: 1071: 1053: 971: 957: 935: 916: 883: 865: 847: 822: 802: 736: 716: 679: 640: 620: 603: 583: 566: 544: 518: 429: 392:
The images selected are high quality, freely licensed and placed in relevant sections.
160: 327: 205: 178: 314: 260: 246: 232: 1660:
It's been so long, I am no longer clear on what this is about. Can you remind me?
856:
Indeed, they are devils, not the devil, but does this section not mention devils?
727:
Thanks! Yes, I will next time I am on this. I think I have time again on Sunday.--
2040:
add 'had' after the comma I moved names in one sentence. This section is good.
360: 2177: 218: 2104:
This section is also excellent. All I did was correct one typo. Well done.
1700:
I made a few small grammar corrections, otherwise this section is good.
1559: 2281:
Yeah, I thought I had run across some while checking sources. Go here
2069:
No comments at all on this section except that it's very well done.
1123: 1119: 354:
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
1708:
I corrected some grammar and content on the problem of evil.
1581:
meaning only an adversary. This applies to your discussion of
1554:"Hebrew writers of the sixth century BC used the imagery of 472:
to make it clear it's about years and not some other unit.
1563:
activity that is contrary to God's will. In this example
488:
eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge
2013:
This is good; I added a 'that' and a comma, that's all.
2428:
Welcome back! Glad to read you managed all that stuff.
772:
Just use the word: "Satan with the definite article ...
134: 103: 2498:
okay. It is good, and I have enjoyed working with you.
1275:
The Birth of Satan: Tracing the Devil's Biblical Roots
1253:
it in the next section. This is a possible reference:
1058:
Yes, you are right. Satan might be mean, but he isn't
631:
to let him know that some issues have been addressed.
1610:
Pagels, Elaine H. The origin of Satan. Vintage, 1996.
1577:
with a definite article as you have it here. This is
1745:
and the existence of the material world is a result
1421:. I'm thinking Theobald may not be the best source. 166:Hello, I am excited to review this GA nomination. 535:know. I am available right now. Happy new year! 1161:. Do you have a reference that says 'torture'? 1372:did you mean mysterious? or maybe mystifying? 1039:What is objectionable is that this paraphrase 453:, they were blasphemous in a priestly ceremony 1230:We'll discuss this one when I come back. :-) 870:I see. As far as I understood, this is about 420:This has all been checked and rechecked now. 8: 1370:only the mystified end of a Babylonian king. 1419:Belial, who epitomizes power hostile to God 30: 2586:DYK will get along just fine without me. 1787:followed by those who adhere to his will. 746:accuser" or "adversary", which is used... 2513:I'm done! It's done!! I have notified 1789:is a sentence fragment, it needs fixing 1353:for example Hieronymus, in his Vulgate — 2532:Nice! Thanks for finishing the review! 1603: 1277:. St. Martin's Publishing Group. p. 1. 1265: 61: 33: 2037: 1804: 1790: 1786: 1772: 1758: 1744: 1730: 1716: 1582: 1543: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1406: 1396: 1369: 1352: 1227: 1206: 1158: 1084: 1040: 1005: 989: 829: 769: 752: 745: 664: 498:, but not sure if it's supposed to be 1273:Wray, T. J.; Mobley, Gregory (2014). 770:The word with the definite article... 7: 2587: 2376:wait. Don't push yourself too much. 2126: 1793:whose? God's or the devils? clarify 183: 1567:is similar to the angel of death." 1205:This is an awfully long sentence: 24: 2038:at some point, freely chosen evil 1041:urging God to let him torture Job 2588: 2127: 2053: 1809: 1795: 1777: 1763: 1749: 1735: 1731:to this view, which was borrowed 1721: 1385: 1358: 1306: 1212: 1102: 1089: 1010: 994: 894: 774: 758: 698: 408: 396: 383: 359: 341: 331: 318: 305: 292: 282: 264: 250: 236: 222: 209: 196: 1759:destruction and suffering, too. 1157:As of today, it's still there: 1: 1904:05:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC) 1876:04:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC) 1850:10:49, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1831:04:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC) 1653:16:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC) 1635:05:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC) 1595:That's all I can do tonight. 1533:05:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1451:16:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC) 1431:05:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1382:05:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1335:15:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC) 1303:08:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1240:17:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC) 1150:04:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1136:23:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC) 1072:14:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1054:04:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 1035:23:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC) 972:14:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 958:14:31, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 936:00:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 917:23:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC) 884:14:36, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 866:00:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 848:23:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC) 823:00:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 803:23:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC) 737:03:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 717:00:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC) 680:17:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC) 1499:Okay, I wonna extent this.-- 641:05:16, 29 January 2022 (UTC) 621:19:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 604:15:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC) 342: 332: 319: 306: 293: 283: 277: 265: 251: 237: 223: 210: 197: 175: 584:03:47, 5 January 2022 (UTC) 567:23:28, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 545:23:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC) 519:23:17, 3 January 2022 (UTC) 176: 161:09:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 2662: 2640:13:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC) 2626:04:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC) 2604:04:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC) 2582:00:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC) 2556:22:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC) 2542:21:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC) 2528:20:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC) 2508:04:16, 18 April 2022 (UTC) 2483:06:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC) 2457:04:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC) 2438:14:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC) 2386:19:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC) 2371:04:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC) 2353:23:59, 20 March 2022 (UTC) 2339:16:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC) 2324:20:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC) 2293:21:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 2277:13:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 2244:02:26, 16 March 2022 (UTC) 2226:19:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC) 2203:01:46, 12 March 2022 (UTC) 2186:20:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC) 2157:01:19, 12 March 2022 (UTC) 2094:01:17, 12 March 2022 (UTC) 1976:01:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC) 1747:remove "the existence of" 685:Satan in the Old Testament 430:20:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC) 18:Talk:Devil in Christianity 2423:05:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC) 2142:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 2114:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 2079:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 2050:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 2023:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 2004:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 1962:06:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC) 1948:12:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC) 1928:05:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC) 1775:add a comma after grasp' 1717:creatures first, then the 1684:13:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 1670:05:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 1509:13:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 1495:05:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC) 1477:22:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC) 1186:12:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC) 1171:04:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC) 983: 907:Sad, I liked them. :-(-- 486:could be rephrased like 2361:finishing this review. 462:birth/death years with 1538:Intertestimental texts 2407: 2252:Charismatic movements 2211:Cathars and Bogomiles 2171:Minor citation issues 356:Good Article criteria 328:free or tagged images 2493:Remainder of article 2009:Anselm of Canterbury 494:There was a typo of 438:The work in progress 1704:Christian teachings 1210:I would divide it. 181:review progress box 2033:Early Christianity 1403:Satan: A Biography 450:Slaughter offering 358:. Criteria marked 2518:Congratulations! 2100:Early Middle Ages 1761:no comma, no too 1569:(pages 39-41, 42) 1126:(main)-article.-- 627:Pinging reviewer 482:Awkward phrasing 374: 373: 370: 369: 366: 89: 88: 2653: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2061: 2057: 2056: 1817: 1813: 1812: 1803: 1799: 1798: 1785: 1781: 1780: 1771: 1767: 1766: 1757: 1753: 1752: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1729: 1725: 1724: 1620: 1617: 1611: 1608: 1461: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1366: 1362: 1361: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1288: 1287: 1270: 1220: 1216: 1215: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1097: 1093: 1092: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1002: 998: 997: 902: 898: 897: 782: 778: 777: 766: 762: 761: 706: 702: 701: 471: 465: 412: 411: 404: 400: 399: 391: 387: 386: 363: 352: 345: 344: 335: 334: 322: 321: 309: 308: 296: 295: 286: 285: 268: 267: 254: 253: 240: 239: 226: 225: 213: 212: 200: 199: 184: 174: 170:Overall progress 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 2661: 2660: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2632:VenusFeuerFalle 2614:VenusFeuerFalle 2589: 2561:VenusFeuerFalle 2548:VenusFeuerFalle 2534:VenusFeuerFalle 2495: 2470:VenusFeuerFalle 2430:VenusFeuerFalle 2410: 2378:VenusFeuerFalle 2358:VenusFeuerFalle 2345:VenusFeuerFalle 2316:VenusFeuerFalle 2257:VenusFeuerFalle 2254: 2236:VenusFeuerFalle 2213: 2195:VenusFeuerFalle 2173: 2149:VenusFeuerFalle 2128: 2102: 2086:VenusFeuerFalle 2067: 2054: 2052: 2035: 2030: 2011: 1992: 1968:VenusFeuerFalle 1940:VenusFeuerFalle 1915:VenusFeuerFalle 1891:VenusFeuerFalle 1863:VenusFeuerFalle 1842:VenusFeuerFalle 1810: 1808: 1805:restored, after 1796: 1794: 1778: 1776: 1764: 1762: 1750: 1748: 1736: 1734: 1722: 1720: 1714: 1706: 1698: 1676:VenusFeuerFalle 1658:VenusFeuerFalle 1645:VenusFeuerFalle 1624: 1623: 1618: 1614: 1609: 1605: 1540: 1501:VenusFeuerFalle 1482:VenusFeuerFalle 1469:VenusFeuerFalle 1455: 1443:VenusFeuerFalle 1386: 1384: 1359: 1357: 1349: 1327:VenusFeuerFalle 1307: 1305: 1292: 1291: 1284: 1272: 1271: 1267: 1213: 1211: 1202: 1200:David and Satan 1178:VenusFeuerFalle 1155:VenusFeuerFalle 1128:VenusFeuerFalle 1103: 1101: 1090: 1088: 1064:VenusFeuerFalle 1027:VenusFeuerFalle 1011: 1009: 995: 993: 986: 984:Job's Adversary 964:VenusFeuerFalle 950:VenusFeuerFalle 909:VenusFeuerFalle 895: 893: 876:VenusFeuerFalle 840:VenusFeuerFalle 795:VenusFeuerFalle 775: 773: 759: 757: 729:VenusFeuerFalle 699: 697: 694:VenusFeuerFalle 687: 662: 653:VenusFeuerFalle 649: 613:VenusFeuerFalle 596:VenusFeuerFalle 555:VenusFeuerFalle 469: 463: 440: 409: 397: 395: 384: 382: 379: 340:pics relevant ( 172: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2659: 2657: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2628: 2606: 2544: 2494: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2441: 2440: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2253: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2212: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2101: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2066: 2063: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2010: 2007: 1991: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1852: 1834: 1833: 1713: 1710: 1705: 1702: 1697: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1622: 1621: 1612: 1602: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1592: 1591: 1571: 1570: 1549: 1548: 1539: 1536: 1522: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1367: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1290: 1289: 1282: 1264: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1222: 1221: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1112: 1111: 1098: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1020: 1019: 1003: 985: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 941: 940: 939: 938: 920: 919: 904: 903: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 851: 850: 834: 833: 827: 826: 825: 808: 807: 806: 805: 787: 786: 783: 767: 750: 742: 741: 740: 739: 722: 721: 720: 719: 686: 683: 661: 658: 648: 647:Second opinion 645: 644: 643: 624: 623: 607: 606: 591: 590: 589: 588: 587: 586: 570: 569: 507: 506: 491: 490: 479: 478: 474: 473: 455: 454: 446:should become 439: 436: 435: 434: 433: 432: 415: 414: 406: 393: 378: 375: 372: 371: 368: 367: 365: 364:are unassessed 349: 348: 276: 275: 272: 271: 171: 168: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2658: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2610: 2607: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2585: 2584: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2570: 2566: 2562: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2516: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2509: 2505: 2501: 2492: 2484: 2480: 2476: 2471: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2420: 2416: 2387: 2383: 2379: 2374: 2373: 2372: 2368: 2364: 2359: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2258: 2251: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2210: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2189: 2188: 2187: 2183: 2179: 2170: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2139: 2135: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2111: 2107: 2099: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2064: 2062: 2060: 2051: 2047: 2043: 2039: 2032: 2027: 2025: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2008: 2006: 2005: 2001: 1997: 1989: 1977: 1973: 1969: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1959: 1955: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1921: 1916: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1819: 1818: 1816: 1806: 1802: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1774: 1773:grasp and the 1770: 1760: 1756: 1746: 1742: 1732: 1728: 1718: 1711: 1709: 1703: 1701: 1696:New Testament 1695: 1685: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1641: 1640: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1616: 1613: 1607: 1604: 1600: 1594: 1593: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1568: 1566: 1561: 1557: 1551: 1550: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1537: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1459: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1413:And this one 1412: 1408: 1404: 1399: 1395: 1394: 1392: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1365: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1313: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1285: 1283:9781466886889 1280: 1276: 1269: 1266: 1262: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1219: 1209: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1109: 1099: 1096: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1055: 1051: 1047: 1042: 1038: 1037: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1017: 1007: 1004: 1001: 991: 988: 987: 973: 969: 965: 961: 960: 959: 955: 951: 947: 946: 945: 944: 943: 942: 937: 933: 929: 924: 923: 922: 921: 918: 914: 910: 906: 905: 901: 891: 885: 881: 877: 873: 869: 868: 867: 863: 859: 855: 854: 853: 852: 849: 845: 841: 836: 835: 831: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 811: 810: 809: 804: 800: 796: 793:noteworthy.-- 791: 790: 789: 788: 784: 781: 771: 768: 765: 755: 751: 747: 744: 743: 738: 734: 730: 726: 725: 724: 723: 718: 714: 710: 705: 695: 691: 690: 689: 688: 684: 682: 681: 677: 673: 668: 666: 659: 657: 654: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 625: 622: 618: 614: 609: 608: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 585: 581: 577: 572: 571: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 548: 547: 546: 542: 538: 533: 529: 525: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 516: 512: 505: 501: 497: 493: 492: 489: 485: 481: 480: 476: 475: 468: 461: 457: 456: 452: 451: 445: 442: 441: 437: 431: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 416: 407: 403: 394: 390: 381: 380: 376: 362: 357: 353: 351: 350: 347: 337: 329: 324: 316: 311: 303: 298: 288: 278: 274: 273: 270: 262: 256: 248: 242: 234: 228: 220: 215: 207: 202: 192: 190: 186: 185: 182: 180: 169: 167: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 2496: 2411: 2255: 2214: 2174: 2103: 2068: 2058: 2036: 2012: 1993: 1912: 1814: 1800: 1782: 1768: 1754: 1740: 1726: 1715: 1707: 1699: 1625: 1615: 1606: 1598: 1578: 1574: 1573:This is not 1572: 1564: 1555: 1553: 1521: 1464: 1402: 1390: 1363: 1311: 1293: 1274: 1268: 1260: 1217: 1107: 1094: 1059: 1015: 999: 899: 871: 779: 763: 703: 669: 663: 650: 508: 503: 499: 495: 487: 483: 459: 447: 443: 401: 388: 339: 326: 313: 300: 290: 280: 258: 244: 230: 217: 204: 194: 187: 179:Good Article 177: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 2609:BlueMoonset 2574:BlueMoonset 2569:WP:DYKSG#H2 1417:which says 1325:explicit.-- 813:Okay then. 633:BlueMoonset 500:monasticism 281:broadness ( 104:visual edit 2618:Jenhawk777 2596:Jenhawk777 2565:Jenhawk777 2520:Jenhawk777 2500:Jenhawk777 2475:Jenhawk777 2449:Jenhawk777 2415:Jenhawk777 2363:Jenhawk777 2331:Jenhawk777 2285:Jenhawk777 2269:Jenhawk777 2218:Jenhawk777 2134:Jenhawk777 2106:Jenhawk777 2071:Jenhawk777 2042:Jenhawk777 2015:Jenhawk777 1996:Jenhawk777 1954:Jenhawk777 1938:recover.-- 1920:Jenhawk777 1896:Jenhawk777 1868:Jenhawk777 1823:Jenhawk777 1662:Jenhawk777 1627:Jenhawk777 1599:References 1552:Try this: 1525:Jenhawk777 1487:Jenhawk777 1458:Jenhawk777 1423:Jenhawk777 1374:Jenhawk777 1295:Jenhawk777 1261:References 1232:Jenhawk777 1163:Jenhawk777 1142:Jenhawk777 1046:Jenhawk777 928:Jenhawk777 858:Jenhawk777 815:Jenhawk777 709:Jenhawk777 692:And Hello 672:Jenhawk777 576:Jenhawk777 561:(he/him • 551:Jenhawk777 537:Jenhawk777 532:Jenhawk777 513:(he/him • 496:monasticsm 422:Jenhawk777 219:ref layout 147:Jenhawk777 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 2515:Shushugah 2408:I'm back! 2147:mother!-- 2065:Byzantium 1990:Augustine 1807:no comma 1733:no comma 1719:no comma 1575:The Satan 1176:Thanks!-- 629:Shushugah 559:Shushugah 528:Shushugah 511:Shushugah 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 2084:Thanks! 1791:his will 1465:belialic 460:"around" 377:The good 189:Criteria 157:contribs 76:Criteria 2028:History 1840:mind.-- 1579:a satan 1565:a satan 1560:Numbers 1556:a satan 1347:Lucifer 302:neutral 291:focus ( 195:prose ( 127:history 108:history 94:Article 1913:{od}} 1712:Origen 1485:quote. 1208:Satan. 1140:Okay. 872:satans 504:monism 315:stable 231:cites 2178:Aza24 1547:here. 1409:from 1124:Devil 1120:Satan 754:Satan 530:I am 467:circa 261:WP:CV 247:WP:OR 233:WP:RS 136:Watch 16:< 2636:talk 2622:talk 2600:talk 2578:talk 2552:talk 2538:talk 2524:talk 2504:talk 2479:talk 2453:talk 2434:talk 2419:talk 2382:talk 2367:talk 2349:talk 2335:talk 2320:talk 2289:talk 2273:talk 2240:talk 2222:talk 2199:talk 2182:talk 2153:talk 2138:talk 2110:talk 2090:talk 2075:talk 2059:Done 2046:talk 2019:talk 2000:talk 1972:talk 1958:talk 1944:talk 1924:talk 1900:talk 1872:talk 1846:talk 1827:talk 1815:Done 1801:Done 1783:Done 1769:Done 1755:Done 1741:Done 1727:Done 1680:talk 1666:talk 1649:talk 1631:talk 1529:talk 1505:talk 1491:talk 1473:talk 1447:talk 1427:talk 1398:for. 1391:Done 1378:talk 1364:Done 1331:talk 1312:Done 1299:talk 1279:ISBN 1236:talk 1218:Done 1182:talk 1167:talk 1146:talk 1132:talk 1108:Done 1095:Done 1068:talk 1060:that 1050:talk 1031:talk 1016:Done 1000:Done 968:talk 954:talk 932:talk 913:talk 900:Done 880:talk 862:talk 844:talk 819:talk 799:talk 780:Done 764:Done 733:talk 713:talk 704:Done 676:talk 660:Lead 637:talk 617:talk 600:talk 580:talk 563:talk 541:talk 526:Hi, 515:talk 426:talk 402:Done 389:Done 338:6b. 325:6a. 289:3b. 279:3a. 257:2d. 243:2c. 229:2b. 216:2a. 203:1b. 193:1a. 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 1122:or 749:It. 651:Hi 502:or 312:5. 299:4. 259:no 245:no 206:MoS 2638:) 2624:) 2602:) 2580:) 2563:, 2554:) 2540:) 2526:) 2506:) 2481:) 2455:) 2436:) 2421:) 2384:) 2369:) 2351:) 2337:) 2322:) 2291:) 2275:) 2242:) 2234:-- 2224:) 2201:) 2184:) 2176:– 2155:) 2140:) 2112:) 2092:) 2077:) 2048:) 2021:) 2002:) 1974:) 1960:) 1946:) 1926:) 1902:) 1874:) 1848:) 1829:) 1682:) 1668:) 1651:) 1633:) 1531:) 1507:) 1493:) 1475:) 1449:) 1429:) 1380:) 1333:) 1301:) 1238:) 1184:) 1169:) 1148:) 1134:) 1070:) 1052:) 1033:) 970:) 956:) 934:) 915:) 882:) 864:) 846:) 821:) 801:) 735:) 715:) 678:) 639:) 619:) 602:) 582:) 565:) 543:) 517:) 470:}} 464:{{ 428:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 2634:( 2620:( 2598:( 2576:( 2550:( 2536:( 2522:( 2502:( 2477:( 2451:( 2432:( 2417:( 2380:( 2365:( 2347:( 2333:( 2318:( 2287:( 2271:( 2238:( 2220:( 2197:( 2180:( 2151:( 2136:( 2108:( 2088:( 2073:( 2044:( 2017:( 1998:( 1970:( 1956:( 1942:( 1922:( 1898:( 1870:( 1844:( 1825:( 1678:( 1664:( 1647:( 1629:( 1527:( 1503:( 1489:( 1471:( 1460:: 1456:@ 1445:( 1425:( 1376:( 1329:( 1297:( 1286:. 1234:( 1180:( 1165:( 1144:( 1130:( 1066:( 1048:( 1029:( 966:( 952:( 930:( 911:( 878:( 860:( 842:( 817:( 797:( 731:( 711:( 674:( 635:( 615:( 598:( 578:( 549:@ 539:( 424:( 346:) 336:) 330:( 323:) 317:( 310:) 304:( 297:) 287:) 269:) 263:( 255:) 249:( 241:) 235:( 227:) 221:( 214:) 208:( 201:) 191:: 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Devil in Christianity
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Jenhawk777
talk
contribs
09:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Good Article
Criteria
MoS
ref layout
WP:RS
WP:OR
WP:CV
neutral
stable
free or tagged images
Good Article criteria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.