Knowledge

Talk:Shooting of James Ashley/GA1

Source 📝

663: 637: 603: 551: 528: 507: 485: 448: 426: 396: 375: 317: 216: 49: 248:
Armed officers had been sent to raid the flat based on reports that Ashley kept a firearm and a quantity of cocaine there, and to arrest Ashley and another man in connection with a stabbing, but no firearm or significant quantity of drugs was found, the other man was not present, and it later emerged
707:
That's fair enough. The rest looks good enough for GA. I hope it does well at FAC, and doesn't attract the attention of at least one of the individuals who is making the process rather unpleasant at the moment! -
416:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). 54: 413: 687:. Thank you very much for the review. I believe I've addressed all your comments except for "Liverpudlian", which I think would be less clear to an international audience. 225: 342: 87: 133: 251:" This is a bit of a monster sentence! Full stop after "connection with a stabbing" and restart? The second Ashley (in "and to arrest Ashley") can be "him" too 59: 77: 129: 620: 114: 346: 338: 330: 106: 264: 650: 334: 538: 82: 457: 435: 163: 612: 17: 238:
Not all of these need to be covered for GA, (which this is broadly at already) but these may help for any next steps
624: 405: 122: 656:
Three images: two PD with good licences; one non-PD relevant for the topic, licence is complete and well rounded
409: 326: 616: 516: 360: 564: 494: 694: 99: 461: 713: 646: 299:" It may be worth a quick line to say that there is always an inquiry after a death by shooting ( 178: 157: 383:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 23: 688: 589: 585: 467:
Earwig shows only matches on names/titles and where material has been quoted appropriately
300: 717: 699: 593: 182: 167: 542:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 384: 193: 709: 684: 174: 153: 282: 263:
the United Kingdom's highest court)," as some smartarse like me will ask about the
515:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 563:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 173:
Reserving this for myself: I'll make a start shortly. Cheers -
500:
Covers the cause, the effents and the long ramifications well
419:
All information is cited to reliable and appropriate sources
301:
https://www.pfoa.co.uk/articles/police-involved-shooting
141: 110: 256:
House of Lords (the United Kingdom's highest court)
226:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 249:that Ashley was not implicated in the stabbing. 441:All information is cited to reliable sources 8: 37: 186: 68: 40: 307:That's it from me on the prose front. 296: 278: 267:without realising the dates concerned. 255: 247: 7: 228:; spelling and grammar are correct. 695: 224:. the prose is clear, concise, and 215: 31: 661: 635: 601: 549: 526: 505: 483: 446: 424: 394: 373: 315: 214: 414:could reasonably be challenged 24:Talk:Death of James Ashley/GA1 1: 621:valid non-free use rationales 18:Talk:Shooting of James Ashley 662: 636: 602: 550: 527: 506: 484: 447: 425: 395: 374: 316: 736: 385:the layout style guideline 573: 471: 355: 202: 192: 718:06:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 700:16:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 696:Penny for your thoughts? 189: 183:14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 168:14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 649:to the topic, and have 325:. it complies with the 297:An inquiry was launched 476:Broad in its coverage 303:is a good one to use) 567:or content dispute. 458:copyright violations 436:no original research 366:no original research 493:. it addresses the 412:. All content that 673:Overall assessment 630:Good on all three 617:copyright statuses 580:, if possible, by 347:list incorporation 279:man from Liverpool 681: 680: 651:suitable captions 623:are provided for 456:. it contains no 259:"House of Lords ( 96: 95: 22:(Redirected from 727: 697: 665: 664: 639: 638: 625:non-free content 605: 604: 553: 552: 530: 529: 509: 508: 487: 486: 450: 449: 428: 427: 406:reliable sources 398: 397: 377: 376: 319: 318: 218: 217: 187: 146: 137: 118: 50:Copyvio detector 38: 27: 735: 734: 730: 729: 728: 726: 725: 724: 329:guidelines for 327:Manual of Style 198:Review Comment 127: 104: 98: 92: 64: 36: 29: 28: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 733: 731: 723: 722: 721: 720: 679: 678: 676: 666: 658: 657: 654: 640: 632: 631: 628: 606: 598: 597: 571: 570: 568: 554: 546: 545: 543: 531: 523: 522: 520: 510: 502: 501: 498: 497:of the topic. 488: 480: 479: 469: 468: 465: 451: 443: 442: 439: 434:. it contains 429: 421: 420: 417: 399: 391: 390: 388: 378: 370: 369: 353: 352: 350: 339:words to watch 320: 312: 311: 309: 305: 304: 292: 291: 287: 286: 274: 273: 269: 268: 252: 243: 242: 236: 233: 232: 229: 219: 211: 210: 200: 199: 196: 191: 172: 147: 94: 93: 91: 90: 85: 80: 74: 71: 70: 66: 65: 63: 62: 60:External links 57: 52: 46: 43: 42: 35: 32: 30: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 732: 719: 715: 711: 706: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 698: 692: 691: 686: 677: 674: 670: 667: 660: 659: 655: 652: 648: 644: 641: 634: 633: 629: 626: 622: 618: 614: 610: 607: 600: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 579: 576: 572: 569: 566: 562: 558: 555: 548: 547: 544: 541: 540: 535: 532: 525: 524: 521: 518: 517:summary style 514: 511: 504: 503: 499: 496: 492: 489: 482: 481: 477: 474: 470: 466: 463: 459: 455: 452: 445: 444: 440: 437: 433: 430: 423: 422: 418: 415: 411: 407: 403: 400: 393: 392: 389: 386: 382: 379: 372: 371: 367: 363: 362: 358: 354: 351: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 331:lead sections 328: 324: 321: 314: 313: 310: 308: 302: 298: 294: 293: 289: 288: 284: 280: 276: 275: 271: 270: 266: 265:Supreme Court 262: 257: 253: 250: 245: 244: 240: 239: 237: 235: 234: 230: 227: 223: 220: 213: 212: 208: 205: 201: 197: 195: 188: 185: 184: 180: 176: 170: 169: 165: 162: 159: 155: 152: 148: 145: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 125: 121: 116: 112: 108: 103: 102: 89: 86: 84: 81: 79: 76: 75: 73: 72: 67: 61: 58: 56: 53: 51: 48: 47: 45: 44: 39: 33: 25: 19: 689: 682: 672: 668: 645:. media are 642: 611:. media are 608: 581: 577: 574: 560: 556: 537: 533: 512: 495:main aspects 490: 475: 472: 453: 431: 410:cited inline 401: 380: 365: 359: 356: 322: 306: 283:Liverpudlian 260: 221: 207:Well-written 206: 203: 171: 160: 150: 149: 142: 138: 124:Article talk 123: 119: 100: 97: 88:Instructions 690:HJ Mitchell 615:with their 578:Illustrated 231:See below. 111:visual edit 462:plagiarism 361:Verifiable 55:Authorship 41:GA toolbox 290:Inquiries 194:Attribute 151:Reviewer: 78:Templates 69:Reviewing 34:GA Review 710:SchroCat 647:relevant 584:such as 565:edit war 281:" -: --> 258:" -: --> 175:SchroCat 164:contribs 154:SchroCat 83:Criteria 539:Neutral 343:fiction 272:Prelude 134:history 115:history 101:Article 619:, and 613:tagged 586:images 561:Stable 345:, and 335:layout 685:Gavin 594:audio 592:, or 590:video 582:media 364:with 190:Rate 143:Watch 16:< 714:talk 408:are 261:then 241:Lead 179:talk 158:talk 130:edit 107:edit 683:Hi 519:). 460:or 716:) 693:| 675:. 671:. 653:. 643:6b 627:. 609:6a 596:: 588:, 575:6. 559:. 536:. 513:3b 491:3a 478:: 473:3. 464:. 454:2d 438:. 432:2c 404:. 402:2b 387:. 381:2a 368:: 357:2. 349:. 341:, 337:, 333:, 323:1b 222:1a 209:: 204:1. 181:) 166:) 132:| 113:| 109:| 712:( 669:7 557:5 534:4 295:" 285:? 277:" 254:" 246:" 177:( 161:· 156:( 139:· 136:) 128:( 120:· 117:) 105:( 26:)

Index

Talk:Shooting of James Ashley
Talk:Death of James Ashley/GA1
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
SchroCat
talk
contribs
14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
SchroCat
talk
14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Attribute
understandable to an appropriately broad audience
Supreme Court
Liverpudlian
https://www.pfoa.co.uk/articles/police-involved-shooting
Manual of Style
lead sections

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.