Knowledge

Talk:Shooting of James Ashley/GA1

Source 📝

656: 630: 596: 544: 521: 500: 478: 441: 419: 389: 368: 310: 209: 42: 241:
Armed officers had been sent to raid the flat based on reports that Ashley kept a firearm and a quantity of cocaine there, and to arrest Ashley and another man in connection with a stabbing, but no firearm or significant quantity of drugs was found, the other man was not present, and it later emerged
700:
That's fair enough. The rest looks good enough for GA. I hope it does well at FAC, and doesn't attract the attention of at least one of the individuals who is making the process rather unpleasant at the moment! -
409:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). 47: 406: 680:. Thank you very much for the review. I believe I've addressed all your comments except for "Liverpudlian", which I think would be less clear to an international audience. 218: 335: 80: 126: 244:" This is a bit of a monster sentence! Full stop after "connection with a stabbing" and restart? The second Ashley (in "and to arrest Ashley") can be "him" too 52: 70: 122: 613: 107: 339: 331: 323: 99: 257: 643: 327: 531: 75: 450: 428: 156: 605: 17: 231:
Not all of these need to be covered for GA, (which this is broadly at already) but these may help for any next steps
617: 398: 115: 649:
Three images: two PD with good licences; one non-PD relevant for the topic, licence is complete and well rounded
402: 319: 609: 509: 353: 557: 487: 687: 92: 454: 706: 639: 292:" It may be worth a quick line to say that there is always an inquiry after a death by shooting ( 171: 150: 376:. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with 681: 582: 578: 460:
Earwig shows only matches on names/titles and where material has been quoted appropriately
293: 710: 692: 586: 175: 160: 535:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 377: 186: 702: 677: 167: 146: 275: 256:
the United Kingdom's highest court)," as some smartarse like me will ask about the
508:. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see 556:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 166:
Reserving this for myself: I'll make a start shortly. Cheers -
493:
Covers the cause, the effents and the long ramifications well
412:
All information is cited to reliable and appropriate sources
294:
https://www.pfoa.co.uk/articles/police-involved-shooting
134: 103: 249:
House of Lords (the United Kingdom's highest court)
219:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 242:that Ashley was not implicated in the stabbing. 434:All information is cited to reliable sources 8: 30: 179: 61: 33: 300:That's it from me on the prose front. 289: 271: 260:without realising the dates concerned. 248: 240: 7: 221:; spelling and grammar are correct. 688: 217:. the prose is clear, concise, and 208: 24: 654: 628: 594: 542: 519: 498: 476: 439: 417: 387: 366: 308: 207: 407:could reasonably be challenged 1: 614:valid non-free use rationales 18:Talk:Shooting of James Ashley 655: 629: 595: 543: 520: 499: 477: 440: 418: 388: 367: 309: 729: 378:the layout style guideline 566: 464: 348: 195: 185: 711:06:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC) 693:16:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC) 689:Penny for your thoughts? 182: 176:14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 161:14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC) 642:to the topic, and have 318:. it complies with the 290:An inquiry was launched 469:Broad in its coverage 296:is a good one to use) 560:or content dispute. 451:copyright violations 429:no original research 359:no original research 486:. it addresses the 405:. All content that 666:Overall assessment 623:Good on all three 610:copyright statuses 573:, if possible, by 340:list incorporation 272:man from Liverpool 674: 673: 644:suitable captions 616:are provided for 449:. it contains no 252:"House of Lords ( 89: 88: 720: 690: 658: 657: 632: 631: 618:non-free content 598: 597: 546: 545: 523: 522: 502: 501: 480: 479: 443: 442: 421: 420: 399:reliable sources 391: 390: 370: 369: 312: 311: 211: 210: 180: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 728: 727: 723: 722: 721: 719: 718: 717: 322:guidelines for 320:Manual of Style 191:Review Comment 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 726: 724: 716: 715: 714: 713: 672: 671: 669: 659: 651: 650: 647: 633: 625: 624: 621: 599: 591: 590: 564: 563: 561: 547: 539: 538: 536: 524: 516: 515: 513: 503: 495: 494: 491: 490:of the topic. 481: 473: 472: 462: 461: 458: 444: 436: 435: 432: 427:. it contains 422: 414: 413: 410: 392: 384: 383: 381: 371: 363: 362: 346: 345: 343: 332:words to watch 313: 305: 304: 302: 298: 297: 285: 284: 280: 279: 267: 266: 262: 261: 245: 236: 235: 229: 226: 225: 222: 212: 204: 203: 193: 192: 189: 184: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 725: 712: 708: 704: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 694: 691: 685: 684: 679: 670: 667: 663: 660: 653: 652: 648: 645: 641: 637: 634: 627: 626: 622: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 600: 593: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 569: 565: 562: 559: 555: 551: 548: 541: 540: 537: 534: 533: 528: 525: 518: 517: 514: 511: 510:summary style 507: 504: 497: 496: 492: 489: 485: 482: 475: 474: 470: 467: 463: 459: 456: 452: 448: 445: 438: 437: 433: 430: 426: 423: 416: 415: 411: 408: 404: 400: 396: 393: 386: 385: 382: 379: 375: 372: 365: 364: 360: 356: 355: 351: 347: 344: 341: 337: 333: 329: 325: 324:lead sections 321: 317: 314: 307: 306: 303: 301: 295: 291: 287: 286: 282: 281: 277: 273: 269: 268: 264: 263: 259: 258:Supreme Court 255: 250: 246: 243: 238: 237: 233: 232: 230: 228: 227: 223: 220: 216: 213: 206: 205: 201: 198: 194: 190: 188: 181: 178: 177: 173: 169: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 682: 675: 665: 661: 638:. media are 635: 604:. media are 601: 574: 570: 567: 553: 549: 530: 526: 505: 488:main aspects 483: 468: 465: 446: 424: 403:cited inline 394: 373: 358: 352: 349: 315: 299: 276:Liverpudlian 253: 214: 200:Well-written 199: 196: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 683:HJ Mitchell 608:with their 571:Illustrated 224:See below. 104:visual edit 455:plagiarism 354:Verifiable 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 283:Inquiries 187:Attribute 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 703:SchroCat 640:relevant 577:such as 558:edit war 274:" -: --> 251:" -: --> 168:SchroCat 157:contribs 147:SchroCat 76:Criteria 532:Neutral 336:fiction 265:Prelude 127:history 108:history 94:Article 612:, and 606:tagged 579:images 554:Stable 338:, and 328:layout 678:Gavin 587:audio 585:, or 583:video 575:media 357:with 183:Rate 136:Watch 16:< 707:talk 401:are 254:then 234:Lead 172:talk 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 676:Hi 512:). 453:or 709:) 686:| 668:. 664:. 646:. 636:6b 620:. 602:6a 589:: 581:, 568:6. 552:. 529:. 506:3b 484:3a 471:: 466:3. 457:. 447:2d 431:. 425:2c 397:. 395:2b 380:. 374:2a 361:: 350:2. 342:. 334:, 330:, 326:, 316:1b 215:1a 202:: 197:1. 174:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 705:( 662:7 550:5 527:4 288:" 278:? 270:" 247:" 239:" 170:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:Shooting of James Ashley
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
SchroCat
talk
contribs
14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
SchroCat
talk
14:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Attribute
understandable to an appropriately broad audience
Supreme Court
Liverpudlian
https://www.pfoa.co.uk/articles/police-involved-shooting
Manual of Style
lead sections
layout

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.