178:
22:
80:
53:
90:
307:
Original research means something closer to "the statement cannot be sourced" instead of "it is made up". I reverted your edit because it was not supported by a reliable source, and it is not an undisputed fact. If you can verify the truth of your statement (using a reliable source), I will leave you
376:
The
Chinese PRC system is Left wing but has some right wing characteristics not unlike Germany in the 30s and 40s. Both having socially Conservative governments who had nationalised lots of industry and private companies allowed to exist had to obey many laws that solely existed for ideological
292:" however it has been removed by two editors who feel this factual wording is "original research". This basically is accusing me of making up information myself, which is not the case. I am giving those two editors a chance to explain their rationale and motivation here in discussion.
380:
From the perspective of Laying Flat/Tang ping/Bai lan When ones effort enriches the government/society and the establishment producing a surplus it is contrary to their interest, in effect the Tang ping ideology is sanctioning China via boycott(to the extent one can do living in china)
326:
Of course it can easily be sourced, because it would be much harder to find anywhere a detailed discussion of Hitler's use of "defeatism" giving any other explanation for it. That's why I could not believe anyone would call this "original research".
225:
was sentenced for being a defeatist. Some are calling Sharon a defeatist. I mean, media can call anyone a defeatist, so if we are listing names, let's just use examples of people who were proclaimed to be defeatists with some consequence following.
390:
While the right wing parties (excluding functionally left wing parties that market themselves as right wing) don't want to conserve the establishment order and want to change policies such as mass migration and speech laws etc.
435:
430:
440:
398:
210:
I am not sure if anybody is going to read this, but let me ask anyway. Would it be ok for me to list people that were called defeatist at some point? Or would it be too politicized? --
185:
63:
111:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
258:
Making an actual list or naming notable people who have been dubbed, categorized, or is "known" for being defeatists, would be extremely political and non-neutral.
284:
I think the article does not do enough to explain why Hitler prosecuted his generals in the final year of World War Two. I tried to add the simple explanation "
425:
148:
138:
387:
P.S. the left wing parties(including
Conservative in name only/RINO types) in the west tend to want to conserve the establishment order(which is leftist)
384:
And to some extent there are accelerationist overtones so in a way it is like revolutionary defeatism but they are in opposition to a communistic regime.
420:
113:
402:
103:
58:
33:
373:
Laying Flat/Tang ping/Bai lan outlook on life is a arguably a "right wing" equivalent to revolutionary defeatism.
21:
263:
39:
218:
Sounds good, but how will they be chosen? Defeatists called such by the media, or from another source?
354:
313:
332:
297:
259:
95:
397:
Given that many left wing groups are authoritarian (not all but a considerable amount)
350:
309:
177:
414:
328:
293:
227:
222:
211:
301:
287:
238:
108:
85:
351:
JJP...MASTER!...MASTER!!! master of puppets, i'm pulling your strings (0-3-5)
310:
JJP...MASTER!...MASTER!!! master of puppets, i'm pulling your strings (0-3-5)
394:
We should rethink categorising left as liberal and right as conservative.
355:
JJP... master? master? where's the dreams that i've been after (0-3-6-5)
314:
JJP... master? master? where's the dreams that i've been after (0-3-6-5)
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
79:
52:
234:
406:
358:
336:
317:
267:
241:
15:
176:
436:
Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
280:
Why Nazi generals were accused of 'defeatism' in 1945
431:
Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
441:
Social and political philosophy task force articles
159:
8:
19:
156:
47:
49:
399:2A02:C7C:9B90:7B00:F137:12D2:D2B0:3095
117:about philosophy content on Knowledge.
7:
101:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
426:Low-importance Philosophy articles
14:
286:for pointing out the truth that
279:
123:Knowledge:WikiProject Philosophy
88:
78:
51:
20:
421:Start-Class Philosophy articles
186:Social and political philosophy
143:This article has been rated as
126:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
349:Please provide a source then.
1:
369:Laying Flat/Tang ping/Bai lan
359:15:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
337:15:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
318:15:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
302:14:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
242:15:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
457:
268:17:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
149:project's importance scale
407:03:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
290:was losing to the Allies.
230:00:48, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
221:Well, I don't know. E.g.
214:17:48, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
184:
155:
142:
73:
46:
160:Associated task forces:
181:
104:WikiProject Philosophy
28:This article is rated
180:
64:Social and political
129:Philosophy articles
182:
114:general discussion
34:content assessment
203:
202:
199:
198:
195:
194:
191:
190:
96:Philosophy portal
448:
167:
157:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
456:
455:
451:
450:
449:
447:
446:
445:
411:
410:
371:
357:
316:
308:be. Thank you!
282:
239:Amir E. Aharoni
208:
165:
128:
125:
122:
119:
118:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
454:
452:
444:
443:
438:
433:
428:
423:
413:
412:
370:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
353:
342:
341:
340:
339:
321:
320:
312:
281:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
249:
248:
247:
246:
245:
244:
207:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
193:
192:
189:
188:
183:
173:
172:
170:
168:
162:
161:
153:
152:
145:Low-importance
141:
135:
134:
132:
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
453:
442:
439:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
422:
419:
418:
416:
409:
408:
404:
400:
395:
392:
388:
385:
382:
378:
374:
368:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
338:
334:
330:
325:
324:
323:
322:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
289:
269:
265:
261:
260:Jonas Vinther
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
243:
240:
236:
232:
231:
229:
228:Dejan Cabrilo
224:
223:Daniil Kharms
220:
219:
217:
216:
215:
213:
212:Dejan Cabrilo
205:
187:
179:
175:
174:
171:
169:
164:
163:
158:
154:
150:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
396:
393:
389:
386:
383:
379:
375:
372:
288:Nazi Germany
285:
283:
209:
144:
112:
102:
40:WikiProjects
233:What about
30:Start-class
415:Categories
120:Philosophy
109:philosophy
59:Philosophy
377:reasons.
329:KZebegna
294:KZebegna
147:on the
36:scale.
235:Jesus
403:talk
333:talk
298:talk
264:talk
206:list
237:?--
139:Low
417::
405:)
335:)
300:)
266:)
226:--
166:/
62::
401:(
331:(
296:(
262:(
151:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
