268:
332:
521:
988:
present in the feathered model in the article's picture; an outline very similar to the clearly visible fenestra in the scaly model. But yeah it is admittedly hard to make out. Though the palaeomemes I brought up aren't necessarily incorrect, they were typical in, say, early-mid 2000s dromaeosaurid reconstructions, which rings alarm bells that it's an older reconstruction. Additionally, my thoughts about the shaggy fur-like plumage remain.
644:
259:
554:
427:
322:
406:
301:
228:
1075:. It gives first the author of the specific name, in brackets (which I believe would be 100% correct), but then ALSO gives the author who assigned the species to that particular genus. While subjectively that would seem a sensible way to convey all the relevant information, I've found absolutely nothing to suggest that this is in any way acceptable according to the ICZN or anything.
437:
814:, who don't consider birds descendants of dinosaurs, just consider dromaeosaurs as birds instead, while explaining their dinosaur features as due to convergent evolution; dromaeosaurs are simply so bird-like that their arguments don't hold up if they are considered dinosaurs. Ironically, given what we now know about the integument of small
761:
But again, regardless of the reason, all modern experts believe dromaeosaurs as a group had feathers (even those who don't believe birds descended from dinosaurs just claim dromaeosaurs aren't dinosaurs either). You'd have to demonstrate that there are still scientists who do not believe dromaeosaurs
746:
All I want to say is that phylogenetic bracketing isn't perfect and that we don't know with 100 certainty that
Deinonychus had feathering. Not arguing that members of its family did at all. I'm only saying we should be more precise in saying this is the animal feathered. I'm just being honest from a
987:
Are you sure the image you've linked to depicts the exact same model? The colouration of the skin on the face appears different, with the article image's feathered model appearing to lack the dark markings visible in your image. To me it appears as though the outline of the antorbital fenestra is
841:
We know very few things in science with 100% certainty, but for something like this that's represented uncontroversially in reliable sources, this is because the accumulation and convergence of evidence reflects a high probability of it being true. If we devoted a "but what if" parenthetical for
694:
Hi wanted to discuss a very minor change. I had did a minor editing on two images stating that this is the animal if it was feathered. An editor seems to have an issue with that. I just wanted to bring that up before reverting it seemed nobody else had an issue with me adding in that specific
1051:
is listed as Paul, 1988. But shouldn't the listed author be the author of the specific name, except in brackets? This is because the author of the specific name is bracketed when the generic name in the binomial is not that of the genus to which the author of the species originally assigned the
970:
I wouldn't say something is incorrect just because it's a "meme". Plenty of modern birds have naked heads and "mohawks", even those closely related to some that don't. "Anti-shrinkwrapping" has itself become a meme; plenty of modern animals have demarcated orbits, for example. A close up of the
731:
Agreed with FonkMonk. That dromaeosaurs were feathered is so well established by fossil evidence and phylogenetic bracketing that positive evidence of lack of feathers in some genera would be necessary to consider it a "possibility" likely enough to be worth mentioning in an image caption.
900:
The paragraph is wholly irrelevant if you exclude the statement "adults would have been flightless because they had proportionally shorter arms" since that statement is not found in any sources and thus must be removed. Reverting more will hopefully result in a permanent edit ban.
949:
The face looks shrink-wrapped (though it's slightly hard to tell), the feathers look 'glued on' to a scaly body rather than like the real plumage we know dromaeosaurids had, and certain unfounded palaeomemes are present like the mohawk and naked head.
1171:
272:
1226:
1161:
166:
877:
was capable of flight or not. Yet the aforementioned study gets a single line, while the bulk of its discussion - pretty extensive within it - is left out. Modern analogues are there for the sake of analogy.
710:
Well, unlike something like
Tyrannosaurus, no scientists doubt all dromaeosaurs were feathered. So it is misleading to suggest it is somehow only a possibility. You wouldn't have a caption saying "this is
1176:
806:
Well, considering the constant back and forth over
Tyrannosaurus feathering, I can understand why caution would be advised. But in this case, there doesn't seem to be any uncertainty. Even people like
1221:
792:
but thank you for a good example. I honestly am just concerned I apologize if I seemed overly picky. Just wanted to make sure we weren't jumping on a band wagon when there is still some uncertainty.
353:-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1191:
1231:
1021:
615:
535:
560:
219:
388:
160:
1078:
Does anyone have clarity on this subject? This has massive implications for other articles, since articles currently seem to vary wildly in how authors are cited.
1186:
1115:
for example, the author who created "bataar" is the one that should be shown, and obviously in brackets if there's a later combination with another generic name.
378:
497:
92:
1156:
953:
I therefore question whether this image should be present here, particularly because the caption insinuates that this is an accurate modern reconstruction.
1206:
1196:
487:
354:
972:
1181:
1166:
1132:
98:
1211:
1216:
463:
345:
306:
964:
1201:
43:
57:
450:
411:
112:
117:
33:
1151:
87:
1014:
892:
917:
281:
1111:
I've also noticed these types of issues in many other articles; the author of the specific name should be the one shown, say
847:
737:
913:
530:
78:
946:. However, forgive me if I'm way off the mark here, but the feathered one looks almost as outdated as the scaly one to me?
181:
1128:
1029:
148:
673:
1101:
993:
960:
747:
scientific standpoint we don't know with 100% accuracy God forbid we find fossilized scale impressions of
Deinonychus.
669:
942:
The image in the
Cultural Significance section features an 'outdated' scaly model and a 'modern' feathered model of
553:
227:
215:
211:
207:
203:
198:
122:
843:
733:
238:
520:
462:
topics on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
258:
540:
287:
1010:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
142:
1116:
1097:
1025:
989:
956:
880:
677:
68:
819:
138:
83:
544:
888:
337:
188:
174:
978:
925:
832:
777:
722:
459:
243:
797:
766:) had feathers to add any claim of doubt to the article. And for the record, the discovery of
752:
700:
64:
652:
442:
240:
643:
1096:
each demonstrate completely contradictory ways of citation so this needs remedying asap.
154:
842:
everything like this, science articles would be twice as long and half as informative. -
937:
884:
815:
1145:
1086:
1054:
1006:
A Commons file used on this page or its
Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
974:
971:
model's head doesn't seem to show even the common sunken antorbital fenestra, though:
921:
828:
823:
807:
773:
718:
811:
793:
788:
768:
748:
696:
350:
1080:
903:
426:
405:
321:
300:
37:
1092:
1063:
432:
327:
668:) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
938:'Modern' reconstruction in Cultural Significance section - looks outdated?
713:
455:
912:
If you suggest analogues yourself, and make your own conclusions, it is
1061:
I've also noticed that some pages go another route. To illustrate, the
242:
1172:
Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in
Biology and health sciences
1136:
1105:
1033:
997:
982:
929:
907:
851:
836:
801:
781:
756:
741:
726:
704:
638:
252:
244:
28:
15:
1162:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in
Biology and health sciences
821:
used in the article is probably inaccurate by not giving the
1227:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
1067:
page lists TWO different authors for the second (dubious)
873:
This is rather silly considering its pretty relevant if
559:
This article appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
608:
589:
1177:
FA-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
173:
1222:
Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
772:
proved even large dromaeosaurs were fully feathered.
454:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
349:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
187:
1232:Knowledge (XXG) articles that use American English
1192:FA-Class Palaeontology articles of Mid-importance
1047:I see in the synonyms section that the author of
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1052:species. You can see this logic applied on the
1020:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
8:
543:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
539:as one of the best articles produced by the
533:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
878:
656:, which has its own spelling conventions (
568:
515:
400:
295:
363:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Palaeontology
256:
1043:and implications for all other articles
402:
297:
1157:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
690:Minor edit for clarity regarding image
1187:Mid-importance Palaeontology articles
676:, this should not be changed without
472:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Dinosaurs
7:
869:Continuously deleting flight section
448:This article is within the scope of
343:This article is within the scope of
286:It is of interest to the following
36:for discussing improvements to the
1207:High-importance dinosaurs articles
1197:WikiProject Palaeontology articles
366:Template:WikiProject Palaeontology
14:
1217:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
642:
552:
519:
435:
425:
404:
330:
320:
299:
266:
257:
226:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1182:FA-Class Palaeontology articles
1167:FA-Class level-5 vital articles
492:This article has been rated as
383:This article has been rated as
1212:WikiProject Dinosaurs articles
475:Template:WikiProject Dinosaurs
1:
930:03:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
908:23:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
466:and see a list of open tasks.
357:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
1034:18:36, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
852:04:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
837:02:25, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
802:02:17, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
782:00:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
757:21:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
742:18:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
727:17:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
705:17:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
1202:FA-Class dinosaurs articles
1248:
1137:20:44, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
1106:20:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
1039:How to cite the author of
616:Featured article candidate
498:project's importance scale
389:project's importance scale
1015:Deinonychus Skeletals.png
998:18:54, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
983:15:44, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
965:13:10, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
629:
571:
567:
541:Knowledge (XXG) community
491:
420:
382:
346:WikiProject Palaeontology
315:
294:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
1049:Velociraptor antirrhopus
1041:Velociraptor antirrhopus
920:, which is not allowed.
561:Today's featured article
21:
1152:FA-Class vital articles
717:if it had fur" either.
1058:article, for example.
369:Palaeontology articles
88:avoid personal attacks
918:WP:original synthesis
786:I already knew about
451:WikiProject Dinosaurs
280:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
273:level-5 vital article
220:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
914:WP:original research
844:Ferahgo the Assassin
827:prey protofeathers.
734:Ferahgo the Assassin
674:relevant style guide
670:varieties of English
597:Good article nominee
118:No original research
672:. According to the
338:Paleontology portal
1113:Tarbosaurus bataar
1026:Community Tech bot
818:, this restoration
572:Article milestones
478:dinosaurs articles
282:content assessment
99:dispute resolution
60:
1098:Zigongosaurus1138
990:Zigongosaurus1138
957:Zigongosaurus1138
896:
883:comment added by
684:
683:
637:
636:
625:
624:
512:
511:
508:
507:
504:
503:
399:
398:
395:
394:
251:
250:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1239:
1125:
1122:
1119:
653:American English
649:This article is
646:
639:
632:Featured article
630:Current status:
611:
592:
569:
563:on May 29, 2011.
556:
531:featured article
523:
516:
480:
479:
476:
473:
470:
460:dinosaur-related
445:
443:Dinosaurs portal
440:
439:
438:
429:
422:
421:
416:
408:
401:
371:
370:
367:
364:
361:
340:
335:
334:
333:
324:
317:
316:
311:
303:
296:
279:
270:
269:
262:
261:
253:
245:
231:
230:
221:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1247:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1142:
1141:
1123:
1120:
1117:
1045:
1022:nomination page
1008:
940:
871:
692:
686:{{Archive box|
678:broad consensus
607:
588:
494:High-importance
477:
474:
471:
468:
467:
441:
436:
434:
415:High‑importance
414:
368:
365:
362:
359:
358:
336:
331:
329:
309:
277:
267:
247:
246:
241:
218:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1245:
1243:
1235:
1234:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1184:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1144:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1044:
1037:
1018:
1017:
1007:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
939:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
870:
867:
865:
863:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
839:
816:ornithischians
729:
691:
688:
682:
681:
647:
635:
634:
627:
626:
623:
622:
619:
612:
604:
603:
600:
593:
585:
584:
581:
578:
574:
573:
565:
564:
557:
549:
548:
524:
510:
509:
506:
505:
502:
501:
490:
484:
483:
481:
464:the discussion
447:
446:
430:
418:
417:
409:
397:
396:
393:
392:
385:Mid-importance
381:
375:
374:
372:
355:the discussion
342:
341:
325:
313:
312:
310:Mid‑importance
304:
292:
291:
285:
263:
249:
248:
239:
237:
236:
233:
232:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1244:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1198:
1195:
1193:
1190:
1188:
1185:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1147:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1114:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1094:
1089:
1088:
1087:Tyrannosaurus
1083:
1082:
1076:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1065:
1059:
1057:
1056:
1055:Tyrannosaurus
1050:
1042:
1038:
1036:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1016:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1005:
999:
995:
991:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
973:
969:
968:
967:
966:
962:
958:
954:
951:
947:
945:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
910:
909:
906:
905:
899:
898:
897:
894:
890:
886:
882:
876:
868:
866:
853:
849:
845:
840:
838:
834:
830:
826:
825:
824:Zephyrosaurus
820:
817:
813:
809:
808:Alan Feduccia
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
791:
790:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
765:
760:
759:
758:
754:
750:
745:
744:
743:
739:
735:
730:
728:
724:
720:
716:
715:
709:
708:
707:
706:
702:
698:
689:
687:
679:
675:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
654:
648:
645:
641:
640:
633:
628:
620:
618:
617:
613:
610:
609:July 16, 2007
606:
605:
601:
599:
598:
594:
591:
587:
586:
582:
579:
576:
575:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
551:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
532:
528:
525:
522:
518:
517:
514:
499:
495:
489:
486:
485:
482:
465:
461:
457:
453:
452:
444:
433:
431:
428:
424:
423:
419:
413:
410:
407:
403:
390:
386:
380:
377:
376:
373:
360:Palaeontology
356:
352:
351:palaeontology
348:
347:
339:
328:
326:
323:
319:
318:
314:
308:
307:Palaeontology
305:
302:
298:
293:
289:
283:
275:
274:
264:
260:
255:
254:
235:
234:
229:
225:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
1112:
1091:
1085:
1079:
1077:
1073:T. utahensis
1072:
1068:
1062:
1060:
1053:
1048:
1046:
1040:
1019:
1009:
955:
952:
948:
943:
941:
902:
879:— Preceding
874:
872:
864:
822:
812:Larry Martin
789:Zhenyuanlong
787:
769:Zhenyuanlong
767:
763:
712:
693:
685:
665:
661:
657:
650:
631:
614:
596:
595:
590:May 26, 2007
545:please do so
534:
526:
513:
493:
449:
384:
344:
288:WikiProjects
271:
223:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
1081:Deinonychus
944:Deinonychus
875:Deinonychus
764:Deinonychus
651:written in
527:Deinonychus
161:free images
44:not a forum
38:Deinonychus
1146:Categories
1093:Torosaurus
1069:Torosaurus
1064:Torosaurus
536:identified
1071:species,
885:Falconfly
762:(or just
469:Dinosaurs
456:dinosaurs
412:Dinosaurs
276:is rated
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
1133:contribs
1118:Jurassic
975:FunkMonk
922:FunkMonk
893:contribs
881:unsigned
829:FunkMonk
774:FunkMonk
719:FunkMonk
714:Smilodon
666:traveled
621:Promoted
278:FA-class
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
1121:Classic
794:Mcelite
749:Mcelite
697:Mcelite
662:defense
580:Process
496:on the
387:on the
224:90Â days
167:WPÂ refs
155:scholar
904:IJReid
602:Listed
583:Result
284:scale.
139:Google
695:fact.
658:color
529:is a
265:This
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
1129:talk
1102:talk
1090:and
1030:talk
994:talk
979:talk
961:talk
926:talk
916:and
889:talk
848:talk
833:talk
810:and
798:talk
778:talk
753:talk
738:talk
723:talk
701:talk
577:Date
488:High
458:and
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
1124:767
1024:. —
379:Mid
189:TWL
1148::
1135:)
1131:|
1104:)
1084:,
1032:)
996:)
981:)
963:)
928:)
895:)
891:•
850:)
835:)
800:)
780:)
755:)
740:)
725:)
703:)
664:,
660:,
222::
214:,
210:,
206:,
169:)
67:;
1127:(
1100:(
1028:(
992:(
977:(
959:(
924:(
887:(
846:(
831:(
796:(
776:(
751:(
736:(
732:-
721:(
699:(
680:.
547:.
500:.
391:.
290::
216:4
212:3
208:2
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
