931:
blue blooded liberal
Brahmins that run the Democratic Party, even if they themselves are in actuality highly educated Ivy League graduates. Thus they will intentionally use gramatically incorrect expressions and seek to adopt a homespun style in an effort to mimic an Appalachian style dialect as part of their public persona. In one of his books William Faulkner refers to local lawyers, including one trained at Harvard, speaking to local Southern townspeople in such a manner in the same way cultured masters would shift from their usual cultured patrician manner into speaking in a different pidgin style when addressing their slaves.
481:
460:
412:
491:
623:
336:
305:
346:
827:
802:
728:
613:
592:
1034:. It is not "preferred usage". It is the name. A political party (or any other organization) gets to create its own official name. When a rival party, or like-minded correspondents, nearly all use a different name, that is indeed "wrong". Is there a single person on Fox that uses the correct name for the Democratic Party? How many Democrats call the Republicans Repugnants? As for your statement:
243:
718:
697:
274:
21:
877:
432:
1058:
I think this article is well-sourced with regard to "Democrat" being an epithet when used in conjunction with "Party". But I think it would be good for the article to also address the use of "Democrat" when used with other nouns, like "Democrat voters". I do not see any good sources (in this article
1007:
a #Grammar section and is, y'know, the truth. More to the point, that's what's actually going on. It's grammatically unobjectionable and only is/feels that way because the other side is using the optional form in order (a) to be obnoxious and 'own' the 'libs' and (b) to try not to let the Dems wrack
930:
My impression when I first heard this expression a few years ago was that it was an ungrammatical term that had roots in homespun rural speech that
Republican politicians picked up on as part of their preferred "low caste" style of casting themselves as common working folk in contrast to the elitist
987:
to the point of parody to have a #Grammar section in this article that lists by name 4 partisan sources that "state" it "is" ungrammatical; a fifth source that places it "within a broader trend" of
English growing dumber; and a final source that declares it "discourteous"... and at no point in the
1116:
I live in
Louisiana, and on a couple of occasions I've personally heard rank-and-file Republicans use "Democrat" as a code word for "Black person." I don't know of any published source on this usage, and I don't know how widespread the usage is, but it suggests that in addition to its other
1008:
up points from the subconscious conflation of them being the democratic party versus the oligarchic republican one. The article shouldn't be so butthurt that it can't own up to that and hides that its own sources disagree with the way they're being misused here. It's extremely
912:
181:
938:
1244:
31:
1204:
521:
175:
1219:
538:
234:
441:
421:
319:
315:
72:
1059:
or otherwise) who say that this usage is an epithet. I think it would be good for this article to also address this "non-Party" usage of
Democrat as an adjective. --
1239:
1224:
1209:
574:
564:
1259:
679:
669:
1274:
784:
774:
1249:
1199:
528:
1264:
107:
1279:
1214:
1194:
833:
807:
402:
392:
1284:
533:
1234:
645:
230:
226:
222:
218:
1254:
1229:
750:
1038:, the characterization of most admins as "far left" is absurd and indicates bias on your part. (Assuming there is such a term as "lean hard")
1269:
113:
1091:
504:
465:
368:
942:
1189:
1153:
1118:
636:
597:
516:
196:
741:
702:
163:
127:
58:
359:
310:
132:
48:
512:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
893:
102:
285:
157:
93:
993:
955:
try to find a reliable source for your speculations. Until the last few years the GOP appealed to upscale voters.
889:
242:
213:
153:
27:
253:
1103:
52:
203:
1157:
1140:
1122:
1043:
137:
1097:, for example), but having "Democrat Party" as part of a book title does seem to me to be escalation. --
1064:
291:
1060:
1017:
934:
838:
812:
496:
273:
169:
20:
1166:
Has no bearing on "Democrat Party" (which this article is about) being a specific anti-Black slur.
1099:
628:
189:
83:
749:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
644:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
367:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1136:
1039:
733:
258:
98:
480:
459:
1094:
960:
79:
255:
411:
351:
900:
1087:
984:
979:
I know us
Wikipedians generally and Wiki admins in particular lean hard left, but it's
973:
1036:
I know us (sic) Wikipedians generally and Wiki admins in particular lean hard left....
345:
335:
304:
1183:
1167:
980:
509:
1170:
1161:
1144:
1126:
1106:
1068:
1047:
1025:
964:
946:
257:
1133:
956:
641:
746:
826:
801:
727:
1079:
723:
618:
612:
591:
486:
341:
508:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1132:
We can't include something like that without a reliable secondary source.
1000:
and is only "wrong" because it's not the actual party's preferred usage.
364:
1149:
The Racial Slur Database says that "Democrats" is a slur for "Blacks."
1078:
I haven't found what I consider to be a reliable source that discusses
1032:...is only "wrong" because it's not the actual party's preferred usage
717:
696:
904:
431:
1150:
1003:
It's ok to admit to that point within this article, given that it
1117:
connotations, "Democrat Party" may be a dog whistle of sorts.
871:
267:
259:
43:
15:
875:
430:
410:
188:
745:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
640:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
363:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
998:grammatically correct and bog standard in English
988:#Grammar section bothers to note the rest of the
1245:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
836:, a project which is currently considered to be
61:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1086:. Levin has frequently used "Democrat Party" (
1205:Unknown-importance American politics articles
202:
8:
1112:"Democrat" as a code word for "Black person"
1220:Unknown-importance political party articles
1054:When use is not in conjunction with "Party"
932:
796:
691:
586:
454:
299:
903:may be able to locate suitable images on
848:Knowledge:WikiProject Citizendium Porting
851:Template:WikiProject Citizendium Porting
939:2604:2D80:ED07:6300:543E:7183:C337:74CD
798:
693:
588:
456:
301:
271:
1035:
1031:
994:Descriptive use of nouns is of course
1240:Low-importance United States articles
1225:Political parties task force articles
1210:American politics task force articles
7:
1260:Low-importance Conservatism articles
832:This article is within the scope of
739:This article is within the scope of
634:This article is within the scope of
502:This article is within the scope of
357:This article is within the scope of
1275:Low-importance Linguistics articles
549:Knowledge:WikiProject United States
290:It is of interest to the following
51:for discussing improvements to the
1250:WikiProject United States articles
1200:B-Class American politics articles
654:Knowledge:WikiProject Conservatism
552:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1265:WikiProject Conservatism articles
759:Knowledge:WikiProject Linguistics
657:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
1280:WikiProject Linguistics articles
1215:B-Class political party articles
1195:Low-importance politics articles
1084:The Democrat Party Hates America
1016:and against our own policies. —
825:
800:
762:Template:WikiProject Linguistics
726:
716:
695:
621:
611:
590:
489:
479:
458:
344:
334:
303:
272:
241:
73:Click here to start a new topic.
19:
1285:Knowledge requested photographs
1151:http://www.rsdb.org/race/blacks
834:WikiProject Citizendium Porting
779:This article has been rated as
674:This article has been rated as
569:This article has been rated as
397:This article has been rated as
30:on 5 March 2009. The result of
26:This article was nominated for
1235:B-Class United States articles
377:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics
1:
1255:B-Class Conservatism articles
1230:WikiProject Politics articles
965:15:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
947:15:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
753:and see a list of open tasks.
648:and see a list of open tasks.
439:This article is supported by
419:This article is supported by
380:Template:WikiProject Politics
371:and see a list of open tasks.
70:Put new text under old text.
1270:B-Class Linguistics articles
1048:14:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
1026:00:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
854:Citizendium Porting articles
442:Political parties task force
422:American politics task force
1074:Mark Levin and his new book
78:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
1301:
1069:01:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
785:project's importance scale
680:project's importance scale
575:project's importance scale
403:project's importance scale
1190:B-Class politics articles
1171:21:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
1162:21:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
1145:00:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
1127:00:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
820:
778:
711:
673:
606:
568:
505:WikiProject United States
474:
438:
418:
396:
329:
298:
108:Be welcoming to newcomers
1107:18:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
637:WikiProject Conservatism
510:United States of America
53:Democrat Party (epithet)
926:Pandering to Illiteracy
884:It is requested that a
742:WikiProject Linguistics
880:
555:United States articles
435:
415:
280:This article is rated
103:avoid personal attacks
879:
660:Conservatism articles
434:
414:
235:Auto-archiving period
128:Neutral point of view
907:and other web sites.
765:Linguistics articles
497:United States portal
360:WikiProject Politics
133:No original research
901:WordPress Openverse
894:improve its quality
892:in this article to
845:Citizendium Porting
808:Citizendium Porting
629:Conservatism portal
523:Articles Requested!
899:The external tool
881:
734:Linguistics portal
436:
416:
286:content assessment
114:dispute resolution
75:
1010:counterproductive
949:
937:comment added by
921:
920:
908:
870:
869:
866:
865:
862:
861:
795:
794:
791:
790:
690:
689:
686:
685:
585:
584:
581:
580:
453:
452:
449:
448:
383:politics articles
320:Political parties
266:
265:
94:Assume good faith
71:
42:
41:
1292:
1102:
1023:
1022:
917:
915:
898:
878:
872:
856:
855:
852:
849:
846:
829:
822:
821:
816:
804:
797:
767:
766:
763:
760:
757:
736:
731:
730:
720:
713:
712:
707:
699:
692:
662:
661:
658:
655:
652:
631:
626:
625:
624:
615:
608:
607:
602:
594:
587:
557:
556:
553:
550:
547:
499:
494:
493:
492:
483:
476:
475:
470:
462:
455:
385:
384:
381:
378:
375:
354:
349:
348:
338:
331:
330:
325:
322:
307:
300:
283:
277:
276:
268:
260:
246:
245:
236:
207:
206:
192:
123:Article policies
44:
23:
16:
1300:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1291:
1290:
1289:
1180:
1179:
1114:
1098:
1076:
1056:
1020:
1018:
977:
928:
913:
911:
876:
853:
850:
847:
844:
843:
810:
764:
761:
758:
755:
754:
732:
725:
705:
659:
656:
653:
650:
649:
627:
622:
620:
600:
554:
551:
548:
545:
544:
543:
529:Become a Member
495:
490:
488:
468:
382:
379:
376:
373:
372:
352:Politics portal
350:
343:
323:
313:
284:on Knowledge's
281:
262:
261:
256:
233:
149:
144:
143:
142:
119:
89:
12:
11:
5:
1298:
1296:
1288:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1242:
1237:
1232:
1227:
1222:
1217:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1182:
1181:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1113:
1110:
1100:John Broughton
1075:
1072:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1050:
976:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
927:
924:
919:
918:
909:
897:
882:
868:
867:
864:
863:
860:
859:
857:
830:
818:
817:
805:
793:
792:
789:
788:
781:Low-importance
777:
771:
770:
768:
751:the discussion
738:
737:
721:
709:
708:
706:Low‑importance
700:
688:
687:
684:
683:
676:Low-importance
672:
666:
665:
663:
646:the discussion
633:
632:
616:
604:
603:
601:Low‑importance
595:
583:
582:
579:
578:
571:Low-importance
567:
561:
560:
558:
542:
541:
536:
531:
526:
519:
517:Template Usage
513:
501:
500:
484:
472:
471:
469:Low‑importance
463:
451:
450:
447:
446:
437:
427:
426:
417:
407:
406:
399:Low-importance
395:
389:
388:
386:
369:the discussion
356:
355:
339:
327:
326:
324:Low‑importance
308:
296:
295:
289:
278:
264:
263:
254:
252:
251:
248:
247:
209:
208:
146:
145:
141:
140:
135:
130:
121:
120:
118:
117:
110:
105:
96:
90:
88:
87:
76:
67:
66:
63:
62:
56:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1297:
1286:
1283:
1281:
1278:
1276:
1273:
1271:
1268:
1266:
1263:
1261:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1248:
1246:
1243:
1241:
1238:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1172:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1152:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1124:
1120:
1111:
1109:
1108:
1105:
1101:
1096:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1082:'s new book,
1081:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1015:
1012:and, y'know,
1011:
1006:
1001:
999:
997:
991:
986:
982:
975:
972:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
948:
944:
940:
936:
925:
923:
916:
910:
906:
902:
895:
891:
887:
883:
874:
873:
858:
841:
840:
835:
831:
828:
824:
823:
819:
814:
809:
806:
803:
799:
786:
782:
776:
773:
772:
769:
752:
748:
744:
743:
735:
729:
724:
722:
719:
715:
714:
710:
704:
701:
698:
694:
681:
677:
671:
668:
667:
664:
647:
643:
639:
638:
630:
619:
617:
614:
610:
609:
605:
599:
596:
593:
589:
576:
572:
566:
563:
562:
559:
546:United States
540:
537:
535:
532:
530:
527:
525:
524:
520:
518:
515:
514:
511:
507:
506:
498:
487:
485:
482:
478:
477:
473:
467:
466:United States
464:
461:
457:
444:
443:
433:
429:
428:
424:
423:
413:
409:
408:
404:
400:
394:
391:
390:
387:
370:
366:
362:
361:
353:
347:
342:
340:
337:
333:
332:
328:
321:
317:
312:
309:
306:
302:
297:
293:
287:
279:
275:
270:
269:
250:
249:
244:
240:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
215:
211:
210:
205:
201:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
155:
152:
151:Find sources:
148:
147:
139:
138:Verifiability
136:
134:
131:
129:
126:
125:
124:
115:
111:
109:
106:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
85:
81:
80:Learn to edit
77:
74:
69:
68:
65:
64:
60:
54:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
1154:75.173.17.90
1119:75.173.17.90
1115:
1083:
1077:
1057:
1013:
1009:
1004:
1002:
995:
989:
978:
933:— Preceding
929:
922:
885:
837:
780:
740:
675:
651:Conservatism
642:conservatism
635:
598:Conservatism
570:
534:Project Talk
522:
503:
440:
420:
398:
358:
292:WikiProjects
238:
212:
199:
193:
185:
178:
172:
166:
160:
150:
122:
47:This is the
35:
1137:O3000, Ret.
1061:Westwind273
1040:O3000, Ret.
756:Linguistics
747:linguistics
703:Linguistics
176:free images
59:not a forum
1184:Categories
1168:--jpgordon
1080:Mark Levin
996:completely
886:photograph
992:article.
990:Economist
985:WP:BIASed
116:if needed
99:Be polite
49:talk page
1019:Llywelyn
935:unsigned
890:included
839:inactive
813:inactive
374:Politics
365:politics
316:American
311:Politics
214:Archives
84:get help
57:This is
55:article.
28:deletion
981:WP:POVy
974:WP:BIAS
957:Rjensen
783:on the
678:on the
573:on the
401:on the
282:B-class
239:90Â days
182:WPÂ refs
170:scholar
914:Upload
905:Flickr
539:Alerts
288:scale.
154:Google
1134:WP:RS
1014:wrong
197:JSTOR
158:books
112:Seek
1158:talk
1141:talk
1123:talk
1104:(♫♫)
1095:2022
1092:2018
1088:2008
1065:talk
1044:talk
983:and
961:talk
943:talk
190:FENS
164:news
101:and
36:keep
34:was
1005:has
896:.
888:be
775:Low
670:Low
565:Low
393:Low
204:TWL
1186::
1160:)
1143:)
1125:)
1090:,
1067:)
1046:)
1021:II
963:)
945:)
318:/
314::
237::
229:,
225:,
221:,
184:)
82:;
1156:(
1139:(
1121:(
1063:(
1042:(
959:(
941:(
842:.
815:)
811:(
787:.
682:.
577:.
445:.
425:.
405:.
294::
231:4
227:3
223:2
219:1
216::
200:·
194:·
186:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
161:·
156:(
86:.
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
