942:
blue blooded liberal
Brahmins that run the Democratic Party, even if they themselves are in actuality highly educated Ivy League graduates. Thus they will intentionally use gramatically incorrect expressions and seek to adopt a homespun style in an effort to mimic an Appalachian style dialect as part of their public persona. In one of his books William Faulkner refers to local lawyers, including one trained at Harvard, speaking to local Southern townspeople in such a manner in the same way cultured masters would shift from their usual cultured patrician manner into speaking in a different pidgin style when addressing their slaves.
492:
471:
423:
502:
634:
347:
316:
357:
838:
813:
739:
624:
603:
1045:. It is not "preferred usage". It is the name. A political party (or any other organization) gets to create its own official name. When a rival party, or like-minded correspondents, nearly all use a different name, that is indeed "wrong". Is there a single person on Fox that uses the correct name for the Democratic Party? How many Democrats call the Republicans Repugnants? As for your statement:
254:
729:
708:
285:
32:
888:
443:
1069:
I think this article is well-sourced with regard to "Democrat" being an epithet when used in conjunction with "Party". But I think it would be good for the article to also address the use of "Democrat" when used with other nouns, like "Democrat voters". I do not see any good sources (in this article
1018:
a #Grammar section and is, y'know, the truth. More to the point, that's what's actually going on. It's grammatically unobjectionable and only is/feels that way because the other side is using the optional form in order (a) to be obnoxious and 'own' the 'libs' and (b) to try not to let the Dems wrack
941:
My impression when I first heard this expression a few years ago was that it was an ungrammatical term that had roots in homespun rural speech that
Republican politicians picked up on as part of their preferred "low caste" style of casting themselves as common working folk in contrast to the elitist
998:
to the point of parody to have a #Grammar section in this article that lists by name 4 partisan sources that "state" it "is" ungrammatical; a fifth source that places it "within a broader trend" of
English growing dumber; and a final source that declares it "discourteous"... and at no point in the
1127:
I live in
Louisiana, and on a couple of occasions I've personally heard rank-and-file Republicans use "Democrat" as a code word for "Black person." I don't know of any published source on this usage, and I don't know how widespread the usage is, but it suggests that in addition to its other
1019:
up points from the subconscious conflation of them being the democratic party versus the oligarchic republican one. The article shouldn't be so butthurt that it can't own up to that and hides that its own sources disagree with the way they're being misused here. It's extremely
923:
192:
949:
42:
1255:
532:
1215:
549:
186:
1230:
452:
432:
330:
326:
245:
585:
83:
690:
1070:
or otherwise) who say that this usage is an epithet. I think it would be good for this article to also address this "non-Party" usage of
Democrat as an adjective. --
795:
1250:
1235:
1220:
575:
539:
1270:
680:
118:
1285:
785:
844:
818:
413:
1260:
1210:
1295:
544:
1275:
656:
1290:
1225:
1205:
403:
761:
124:
1245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
1265:
1240:
1049:, the characterization of most admins as "far left" is absurd and indicates bias on your part. (Assuming there is such a term as "lean hard")
515:
476:
379:
1280:
647:
608:
1102:
69:
752:
713:
953:
1200:
1164:
1129:
527:
207:
138:
370:
321:
174:
143:
59:
523:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
904:
113:
296:
104:
900:
168:
38:
1004:
966:
try to find a reliable source for your speculations. Until the last few years the GOP appealed to upscale voters.
253:
224:
164:
148:
264:
1114:
63:
302:
214:
1168:
1151:
1133:
1054:
945:
849:
823:
1108:, for example), but having "Democrat Party" as part of a book title does seem to me to be escalation. --
94:
1075:
760:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
655:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
378:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
109:
1071:
1028:
507:
284:
180:
31:
1177:
Has no bearing on "Democrat Party" (which this article is about) being a specific anti-Black slur.
1110:
639:
200:
1147:
1050:
744:
269:
491:
470:
1105:
971:
90:
995:
984:
266:
17:
991:
422:
362:
1144:
911:
1098:
990:
I know us
Wikipedians generally and Wiki admins in particular lean hard left, but it's
1047:
I know us (sic) Wikipedians generally and Wiki admins in particular lean hard left....
356:
346:
315:
1194:
1178:
520:
1181:
1172:
1155:
1137:
1117:
1079:
1058:
1036:
975:
957:
268:
967:
652:
757:
837:
812:
738:
1090:
734:
629:
623:
602:
497:
352:
519:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1143:
We can't include something like that without a reliable secondary source.
1011:
and is only "wrong" because it's not the actual party's preferred usage.
375:
1160:
The Racial Slur Database says that "Democrats" is a slur for "Blacks."
1089:
I haven't found what I consider to be a reliable source that discusses
1043:...is only "wrong" because it's not the actual party's preferred usage
728:
707:
915:
442:
1161:
1014:
It's ok to admit to that point within this article, given that it
1128:
connotations, "Democrat Party" may be a dog whistle of sorts.
882:
278:
270:
54:
26:
886:
441:
421:
199:
756:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
651:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
374:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
213:
1009:grammatically correct and bog standard in English
999:#Grammar section bothers to note the rest of the
1256:B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
847:, a project which is currently considered to be
72:for general discussion of the article's subject.
859:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Citizendium Porting
1097:. Levin has frequently used "Democrat Party" (
1216:Unknown-importance American politics articles
8:
1123:"Democrat" as a code word for "Black person"
1231:Unknown-importance political party articles
1065:When use is not in conjunction with "Party"
943:
807:
702:
597:
465:
310:
914:may be able to locate suitable images on
560:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
862:Template:WikiProject Citizendium Porting
665:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Conservatism
950:2604:2D80:ED07:6300:543E:7183:C337:74CD
809:
770:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Linguistics
704:
599:
467:
312:
282:
1046:
1042:
1005:Descriptive use of nouns is of course
1296:Knowledge (XXG) requested photographs
1251:Low-importance United States articles
1236:Political parties task force articles
1221:American politics task force articles
7:
1271:Low-importance Conservatism articles
843:This article is within the scope of
750:This article is within the scope of
645:This article is within the scope of
513:This article is within the scope of
388:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
368:This article is within the scope of
1286:Low-importance Linguistics articles
301:It is of interest to the following
62:for discussing improvements to the
1261:WikiProject United States articles
1211:B-Class American politics articles
563:Template:WikiProject United States
25:
1276:WikiProject Conservatism articles
668:Template:WikiProject Conservatism
89:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1291:WikiProject Linguistics articles
1226:B-Class political party articles
1206:Low-importance politics articles
1095:The Democrat Party Hates America
1027:and against our own policies. —
836:
811:
773:Template:WikiProject Linguistics
737:
727:
706:
632:
622:
601:
500:
490:
469:
355:
345:
314:
283:
252:
84:Click here to start a new topic.
30:
1162:http://www.rsdb.org/race/blacks
845:WikiProject Citizendium Porting
790:This article has been rated as
685:This article has been rated as
580:This article has been rated as
408:This article has been rated as
41:on 5 March 2009. The result of
37:This article was nominated for
1246:B-Class United States articles
1:
1266:B-Class Conservatism articles
1241:WikiProject Politics articles
976:15:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
958:15:19, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
764:and see a list of open tasks.
659:and see a list of open tasks.
450:This article is supported by
430:This article is supported by
391:Template:WikiProject Politics
382:and see a list of open tasks.
81:Put new text under old text.
1281:B-Class Linguistics articles
1059:14:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
1037:00:24, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
865:Citizendium Porting articles
453:Political parties task force
433:American politics task force
18:Talk:Democrat Party (phrase)
1085:Mark Levin and his new book
1312:
1080:01:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
796:project's importance scale
691:project's importance scale
586:project's importance scale
414:project's importance scale
1201:B-Class politics articles
1182:21:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
1173:21:09, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
1156:00:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
1138:00:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
831:
789:
722:
684:
617:
579:
516:WikiProject United States
485:
449:
429:
407:
340:
309:
119:Be welcoming to newcomers
1118:18:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
648:WikiProject Conservatism
521:United States of America
64:Democrat Party (epithet)
937:Pandering to Illiteracy
895:It is requested that a
753:WikiProject Linguistics
891:
566:United States articles
446:
426:
291:This article is rated
114:avoid personal attacks
890:
671:Conservatism articles
445:
425:
295:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
246:Auto-archiving period
139:Neutral point of view
918:and other web sites.
776:Linguistics articles
508:United States portal
371:WikiProject Politics
144:No original research
912:WordPress Openverse
905:improve its quality
903:in this article to
856:Citizendium Porting
819:Citizendium Porting
640:Conservatism portal
534:Articles Requested!
910:The external tool
892:
745:Linguistics portal
447:
427:
297:content assessment
125:dispute resolution
86:
1021:counterproductive
960:
948:comment added by
932:
931:
919:
881:
880:
877:
876:
873:
872:
806:
805:
802:
801:
701:
700:
697:
696:
596:
595:
592:
591:
464:
463:
460:
459:
394:politics articles
331:Political parties
277:
276:
105:Assume good faith
82:
53:
52:
16:(Redirected from
1303:
1113:
1034:
1033:
928:
926:
909:
889:
883:
867:
866:
863:
860:
857:
840:
833:
832:
827:
815:
808:
778:
777:
774:
771:
768:
747:
742:
741:
731:
724:
723:
718:
710:
703:
673:
672:
669:
666:
663:
642:
637:
636:
635:
626:
619:
618:
613:
605:
598:
568:
567:
564:
561:
558:
510:
505:
504:
503:
494:
487:
486:
481:
473:
466:
396:
395:
392:
389:
386:
365:
360:
359:
349:
342:
341:
336:
333:
318:
311:
294:
288:
287:
279:
271:
257:
256:
247:
218:
217:
203:
134:Article policies
55:
34:
27:
21:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1191:
1190:
1125:
1109:
1087:
1067:
1031:
1029:
988:
939:
924:
922:
887:
864:
861:
858:
855:
854:
821:
775:
772:
769:
766:
765:
743:
736:
716:
670:
667:
664:
661:
660:
638:
633:
631:
611:
565:
562:
559:
556:
555:
554:
540:Become a Member
506:
501:
499:
479:
393:
390:
387:
384:
383:
363:Politics portal
361:
354:
334:
324:
292:
273:
272:
267:
244:
160:
155:
154:
153:
130:
100:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1309:
1307:
1299:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1193:
1192:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1124:
1121:
1111:John Broughton
1086:
1083:
1066:
1063:
1062:
1061:
987:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
938:
935:
930:
929:
920:
908:
893:
879:
878:
875:
874:
871:
870:
868:
841:
829:
828:
816:
804:
803:
800:
799:
792:Low-importance
788:
782:
781:
779:
762:the discussion
749:
748:
732:
720:
719:
717:Low‑importance
711:
699:
698:
695:
694:
687:Low-importance
683:
677:
676:
674:
657:the discussion
644:
643:
627:
615:
614:
612:Low‑importance
606:
594:
593:
590:
589:
582:Low-importance
578:
572:
571:
569:
553:
552:
547:
542:
537:
530:
528:Template Usage
524:
512:
511:
495:
483:
482:
480:Low‑importance
474:
462:
461:
458:
457:
448:
438:
437:
428:
418:
417:
410:Low-importance
406:
400:
399:
397:
380:the discussion
367:
366:
350:
338:
337:
335:Low‑importance
319:
307:
306:
300:
289:
275:
274:
265:
263:
262:
259:
258:
220:
219:
157:
156:
152:
151:
146:
141:
132:
131:
129:
128:
121:
116:
107:
101:
99:
98:
87:
78:
77:
74:
73:
67:
51:
50:
43:the discussion
35:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1308:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1272:
1269:
1267:
1264:
1262:
1259:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1196:
1183:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1122:
1120:
1119:
1116:
1112:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1093:'s new book,
1092:
1084:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1035:
1026:
1023:and, y'know,
1022:
1017:
1012:
1010:
1008:
1002:
997:
993:
986:
983:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
959:
955:
951:
947:
936:
934:
927:
921:
917:
913:
906:
902:
898:
894:
885:
884:
869:
852:
851:
846:
842:
839:
835:
834:
830:
825:
820:
817:
814:
810:
797:
793:
787:
784:
783:
780:
763:
759:
755:
754:
746:
740:
735:
733:
730:
726:
725:
721:
715:
712:
709:
705:
692:
688:
682:
679:
678:
675:
658:
654:
650:
649:
641:
630:
628:
625:
621:
620:
616:
610:
607:
604:
600:
587:
583:
577:
574:
573:
570:
557:United States
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
535:
531:
529:
526:
525:
522:
518:
517:
509:
498:
496:
493:
489:
488:
484:
478:
477:United States
475:
472:
468:
455:
454:
444:
440:
439:
435:
434:
424:
420:
419:
415:
411:
405:
402:
401:
398:
381:
377:
373:
372:
364:
358:
353:
351:
348:
344:
343:
339:
332:
328:
323:
320:
317:
313:
308:
304:
298:
290:
286:
281:
280:
261:
260:
255:
251:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
226:
222:
221:
216:
212:
209:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
166:
163:
162:Find sources:
159:
158:
150:
149:Verifiability
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
136:
135:
126:
122:
120:
117:
115:
111:
108:
106:
103:
102:
96:
92:
91:Learn to edit
88:
85:
80:
79:
76:
75:
71:
65:
61:
57:
56:
48:
44:
40:
36:
33:
29:
28:
19:
1165:75.173.17.90
1130:75.173.17.90
1126:
1094:
1088:
1068:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1013:
1006:
1000:
989:
944:— Preceding
940:
933:
896:
848:
791:
751:
686:
662:Conservatism
653:conservatism
646:
609:Conservatism
581:
545:Project Talk
533:
514:
451:
431:
409:
369:
303:WikiProjects
249:
223:
210:
204:
196:
189:
183:
177:
171:
161:
133:
58:This is the
46:
1148:O3000, Ret.
1072:Westwind273
1051:O3000, Ret.
767:Linguistics
758:linguistics
714:Linguistics
187:free images
70:not a forum
1195:Categories
1179:--jpgordon
1091:Mark Levin
1007:completely
897:photograph
1003:article.
1001:Economist
996:WP:BIASed
127:if needed
110:Be polite
60:talk page
1030:Llywelyn
946:unsigned
901:included
850:inactive
824:inactive
385:Politics
376:politics
327:American
322:Politics
225:Archives
95:get help
68:This is
66:article.
39:deletion
992:WP:POVy
985:WP:BIAS
968:Rjensen
794:on the
689:on the
584:on the
412:on the
293:B-class
250:90Â days
193:WPÂ refs
181:scholar
925:Upload
916:Flickr
550:Alerts
299:scale.
165:Google
1145:WP:RS
1025:wrong
208:JSTOR
169:books
123:Seek
1169:talk
1152:talk
1134:talk
1115:(♫♫)
1106:2022
1103:2018
1099:2008
1076:talk
1055:talk
994:and
972:talk
954:talk
201:FENS
175:news
112:and
47:keep
45:was
1016:has
907:.
899:be
786:Low
681:Low
576:Low
404:Low
215:TWL
1197::
1171:)
1154:)
1136:)
1101:,
1078:)
1057:)
1032:II
974:)
956:)
329:/
325::
248::
240:,
236:,
232:,
195:)
93:;
1167:(
1150:(
1132:(
1074:(
1053:(
970:(
952:(
853:.
826:)
822:(
798:.
693:.
588:.
456:.
436:.
416:.
305::
242:4
238:3
234:2
230:1
227::
211:·
205:·
197:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
172:·
167:(
97:.
49:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
