Knowledge

Talk:Desargues's theorem

Source 📝

84: 74: 53: 385: 1320: 22: 1630: 1392:: two triangles can't be in axial perspective unless there exists a plane containing both. So if we replace "projective spaces" by "projective planes" throughout the article then there are fewer cases to explain in this lead paragraph. But that would be a significant rewrite, and I'm not sure whether it's justified by the sources. 216:
There is a nice practical application in perspective drawing: suppose you have two (or more) lines drawn in perspective, which meet at a vanishing point located far enough away from the physical page to be constructed directly. Desargues' theorem can be used to construct additional lines which meet
1238:
So these geometric transforms can be easily be written in elementary matrices coordinate system independently, i.e., we don't have to project objects only to those coordinate planes in order to simplify the projection matrix establishment procedure: the projection matrix which projects objects to an
242:
article hadn't yet been created. I would prefer not to merge, as I think that perspective triangles are important enough, that there are enough results about them that are distinct from Desargues' theorem, and that there are enough other topics already included in the Desargues theorem article that
338:
Proper nouns that end with s: There is tension in English over whether just an apostrophe, or an apostrophe and the letter s, should be added to such proper nouns (James' house or James's house, but be consistent within an article). Some forms always take an extra s (Ross's father); some, mainly
349:
The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics, and Britannica (at least as far back as 1986, the publication year of my hard copy) write it as "Desargues's theorem," as do the more authoritative sources on the web, although a majority of pop writers still seem to be using the old style. Journal
1780:
It doesn't matter whether the projective plane is self-dual; what matters is that the statement is self-dual. That is, the dual of the statement is the same statement. So if you prove the statement in some plane (self-dual or not) you have also proved the dual of the statement.
372:
It is possible for ten points and ten lines in the plane to be so arranged that each of the ten lines passes through three of the ten points and each of the ten points lies on three of the ten lines, even though that whole configuration is
1434:
I edited the POTD caption to avoid using the word "produced". I agree that it is exactly the right technical term for the line that contains a line segment, but we should avoid jargon that is likely to be unfamiliar to non-geometers.
344:
Although omitting the s used to be the norm for such names (I was raised in the pro-omission tradition and have been accustomed until recently to writing it as Desargues'), more recent sources such as the 1961 edition of Coxeter's
288:
A better question might be: Specifically what other relations of Desargues' theorem to concepts in mathematics do you have in mind other than perspective triangles? The theorem should be merged into the definition if anything.
171:
Compass and Ruler is written in Java by von R Grothmann. This program is excellent. It is very well written, in Java and available for Mac or Windows or Linux, and it is free with source code too. Its home page is at
1450:
Maybe you thought of a solution but didn't actually implement it. The caption still said "produced" when I looked at it. I've made a change, but feel free to edit this further if you can think of a better way.
1548:
The CC license for this image does call for attribution when it is used (remixed in your case). Try Googling Desargues theorem images, I'm sure that you'll find one that doesn't ask for attribution.
1419:
axially perspective which makes the proof in 3 dimensions so easy. I've done what I can for this article - if only I had an additional 24 hours or had this occurred in a different week - Oh well!
353:
Does anyone have any strong opinions either way? In particular are there any strong objections to matching Knowledge's style in the case of Desargues to the usage of the sources cited above? --
1526:
I'd like to use the image on the t-shirts we give away to students in out local high school mathematics contest. I don't really want to write an attribution on the shirt. Would that be okay?
140: 944: 798: 1152: 486: 1199: 1087:§ Detailed proof via homogeneous coordinates representation of the extended Desargues theorem, and its applications in computer graphics can be seen from the link below: 876: 1233: 1095:§ A series of geometric transformations, perspective projection, parallel projection, reflection, translation transform and so on, can all be defined as one concept: 1082: 1000: 827: 1026: 725: 697: 669: 1049: 967: 621: 576: 531: 1707: 1703: 1689: 641: 596: 551: 506: 1810: 130: 1363: 1254: 730:§ Then the extended Desargues' theorem in higher dimensional projective space, e.g., three dimensional projective space, can be represented as 106: 1805: 1613: 350:
editors these days seem to be encouraging its inclusion (I was recently picked on by one for using the old style and adapted accordingly).
197: 1533: 1685:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
97: 58: 1675: 1286:. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the 1275: 1267: 1563: 190:
I also have trouble with the proof. It depends on various lines being "concurrent," but "concurrent is nowhere defined.
1750: 1567: 1407:
I agree that the lead could use a rewrite, but I can't do it in the amount of time left. The suggestion about replacing
1313: 1279: 33: 1367: 1492: 1319: 1765:
The article hand-waves it away by saying it follows by duality. But some projective planes are not self-dual. --
1706:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1786: 1617: 1575: 1470: 1440: 1415:
doesn't work, since it is precisely that two triangles in different planes which are centrally perspective are
1283: 414: 248: 201: 881: 173: 1741: 1667: 1537: 399: 358: 267: 1340: 262:
Specifically, what results about perspective triangles other than Desargues' theorem do you have in mind?
239: 228: 186:
I don't understand from the proof... I can't see the equivalence with those scalar & cross products.
157:
Great god.... even esoteric subject get a fine treatment. Thanks to whoever contributed to this article.
1725:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1713: 1465:
Sorry, I meant that I changed it in the POTD box. I didn't make the same change to the actual article. —
218: 39: 1666:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 1239:
arbitrary plane is actually an elementary matrix in very simple form which we can easily write it out!
83: 1659: 1609: 1529: 1488: 311: 290: 193: 733: 21: 1782: 1571: 1466: 1436: 1331: 1326: 1098: 410: 339:
Biblical and Classical, usually do not (Socrates' wife; Moses' ascent of Sinai; Jesus' last words).
244: 1766: 105:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1641: 1606:
The 3-dimesional proof depends on various lines being "concurrent." Please define "concurrent."
1553: 1509: 1456: 1424: 1397: 1388:
is somewhat clumsy. I'm used to thinking about Desargues's theorem as a result about projective
1301: 432: 395: 362: 354: 263: 89: 1710:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
73: 52: 1726: 1157: 1770: 1676:
https://web.archive.org/web/20090321024112/http://math.kennesaw.edu/~mdevilli/JavaGSPLinks.htm
1592: 1352: 384: 832: 1733: 1203: 1348: 1054: 972: 803: 329:
Not a matter for concern on a par with the current state of the economy, but Knowledge's
1005: 702: 674: 646: 1692:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1358: 1344: 1031: 949: 601: 556: 511: 1732:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1679: 1242:§ The applications of the above results were further discussed in the link mentioned. 626: 581: 536: 491: 1799: 1637: 1549: 1505: 1452: 1420: 1393: 1347:
they are in perspective centrally. Lines through the triangle sides meet in pairs at
1293: 377:
incidence-isomorphic to the Desargues configuration. Should that be mentioned here?
179: 158: 1261: 1090: 1588: 310:
Since this hasn't any opposition for quite a while, I'll just remove the template.
1790: 1774: 1755: 1699: 1645: 1621: 1596: 1579: 1557: 1541: 1513: 1496: 1487:
Please add the date when this theorem was discovered or proved or conjectured --
1474: 1460: 1444: 1428: 1401: 1307: 418: 403: 330: 318: 297: 271: 252: 221: 205: 102: 1154:, of which transform matrix has been proved to be equivalent to the concept of 178:
that we can use and build example files to go along with article and theorems.
1698:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 235: 79: 1374:
I have two concerns, although I'm not sure of the best way to address them.
1287: 1570:
has a license that doesn't require attribution, and might fit your needs. —
243:
it would be confusing to link to it under the perspective triangle name. —
174:
http://mathsrv.ku-eichstaett.de/MGF/homes/grothmann/java/zirkel/index.html
1336: 878:
are tetrahedrons or at most one of them is quadrangle. In this case, the
1351:
along the axis of perspectivity. Lines through corresponding pairs of
1355:
on the triangles meet at a point called the center of perspectivity.
425:
Extended Desargues' theorem and Its Application in Computer Graphics
1274:
Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that
424: 429:§ First, let Desargues theorem be simplified as the symbol of 15: 1282:
on November 2, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at
383: 1670:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1562:
You might also try looking at some of the other images in
1663: 238:
and was forced to resort to MathWorld instead, as the
1206: 1160: 1101: 1057: 1034: 1008: 975: 952: 884: 835: 806: 736: 705: 677: 649: 629: 604: 584: 559: 539: 514: 494: 435: 409:
Added. As always, feel free to reword my addition. —
101:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1702:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 1680:
http://math.kennesaw.edu/~mdevilli/JavaGSPLinks.htm
1253:tags on this page without content in them (see the 1377:First, in the picture caption, I think the phrase 1227: 1193: 1146: 1076: 1043: 1020: 994: 961: 938: 870: 821: 792: 719: 691: 663: 635: 615: 590: 570: 545: 525: 500: 480: 1381:is likely to be confusing to non-mathematicians. 1262:http://www.newsmth.net/att.php?p.50.48793.475.pdf 1091:http://www.newsmth.net/att.php?p.50.48793.475.pdf 1688:This message was posted before February 2018. 8: 623:are corresponding point pairs respectively, 1658:I have just modified one external link on 1607: 1527: 1290:so Knowledge doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! 234:I needed a link for perspective triangles 191: 47: 1205: 1159: 1100: 1056: 1033: 1007: 974: 951: 939:{\displaystyle C_{n+1}^{2}=C_{3+1}^{2}=6} 924: 913: 900: 889: 883: 834: 805: 735: 704: 676: 648: 628: 603: 583: 558: 538: 513: 493: 434: 1084:, are coplanar, not collinear any more. 643:is the intersection point of the lines 168:btw, there's this great free software: 49: 19: 1587:Thanks to both of you for your advice. 1384:Second, the lead paragraph beginning 217:at the same vanishing point. --Heath 164:adding dynamic geometry program files 7: 95:This article is within the scope of 1564:Commons:Category:Desargues' theorem 1483:This article needs to include dates 1245: 38:It is of interest to the following 946:intersection points of line pairs 212:application in perspective drawing 14: 1811:Mid-priority mathematics articles 1662:. Please take a moment to review 1386:Desargues's theorem holds for ... 115:Knowledge:WikiProject Mathematics 1628: 1318: 118:Template:WikiProject Mathematics 82: 72: 51: 20: 793:{\displaystyle ABCD-S-A'B'C'D'} 135:This article has been rated as 1276:File:Desargues theorem alt.svg 1268:File:Desargues theorem alt.svg 1147:{\displaystyle Stereohomology} 324: 1: 1756:09:14, 9 September 2017 (UTC) 253:04:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC) 109:and see a list of open tasks. 1806:C-Class mathematics articles 1791:01:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 1775:00:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 1761:Proof of converse statement? 1568:File:DesarguesHessenberg.svg 1475:23:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 1461:23:27, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 1445:17:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 1429:16:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 1402:01:13, 1 November 2011 (UTC) 1308:20:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC) 481:{\displaystyle ABC-S-A'B'C'} 363:02:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC) 298:02:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC) 1646:15:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 1622:13:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 419:22:24, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 404:18:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC) 368:Non-Desargues configuration 319:18:44, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 272:22:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC) 206:13:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC) 1827: 1719:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1655:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1580:22:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC) 1558:22:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC) 1542:19:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC) 1194:{\displaystyle elementary} 325:Desargues' or Desargues's? 1597:12:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 1368:More featured pictures... 347:Introduction to Geometry, 222:05:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC) 182:15:36, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC) 134: 67: 46: 1602:Definition of concurrent 1514:01:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC) 1497:12:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC) 1284:Template:POTD/2011-11-02 871:{\displaystyle A'B'C'D'} 141:project's priority scale 1651:External links modified 1522:Permission to use image 98:WikiProject Mathematics 1270:to appear as POTD soon 1229: 1228:{\displaystyle matrix} 1195: 1148: 1078: 1045: 1022: 996: 963: 940: 872: 823: 794: 721: 693: 665: 637: 617: 592: 572: 547: 527: 502: 482: 388: 240:Perspective (geometry) 229:Perspective (geometry) 227:Suggested merger from 28:This article is rated 1278:will be appearing as 1235:in numeric analysis. 1230: 1196: 1149: 1079: 1046: 1023: 997: 964: 941: 873: 824: 795: 722: 694: 666: 638: 618: 593: 573: 548: 528: 503: 483: 387: 1700:regular verification 1204: 1158: 1099: 1077:{\displaystyle A'D'} 1055: 1032: 1006: 995:{\displaystyle A'B'} 973: 950: 882: 833: 822:{\displaystyle ABCD} 804: 734: 703: 675: 647: 627: 602: 582: 557: 537: 512: 492: 433: 121:mathematics articles 1690:After February 2018 1660:Desargues's theorem 1327:projective geometry 1021:{\displaystyle ...} 929: 905: 720:{\displaystyle CC'} 692:{\displaystyle BB'} 664:{\displaystyle AA'} 1744:InternetArchiveBot 1695:InternetArchiveBot 1332:Desargues' theorem 1314:Picture of the day 1280:picture of the day 1225: 1191: 1144: 1074: 1044:{\displaystyle AD} 1041: 1018: 992: 962:{\displaystyle AB} 959: 936: 909: 885: 868: 819: 790: 717: 689: 661: 633: 616:{\displaystyle C'} 613: 588: 571:{\displaystyle B'} 568: 543: 526:{\displaystyle A'} 523: 498: 478: 389: 90:Mathematics portal 34:content assessment 1720: 1624: 1612:comment added by 1544: 1532:comment added by 1361: 1305: 636:{\displaystyle S} 591:{\displaystyle C} 546:{\displaystyle B} 501:{\displaystyle A} 316: 295: 208: 196:comment added by 155: 154: 151: 150: 147: 146: 1818: 1754: 1745: 1718: 1717: 1696: 1638:Bill Cherowitzo 1636: 1632: 1631: 1566:. For instance, 1550:Bill Cherowitzo 1506:Bill Cherowitzo 1421:Bill Cherowitzo 1356: 1349:collinear points 1335:states that two 1322: 1306: 1299: 1296: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1252: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1200: 1198: 1197: 1192: 1153: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1083: 1081: 1080: 1075: 1073: 1065: 1050: 1048: 1047: 1042: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1019: 1001: 999: 998: 993: 991: 983: 968: 966: 965: 960: 945: 943: 942: 937: 928: 923: 904: 899: 877: 875: 874: 869: 867: 859: 851: 843: 828: 826: 825: 820: 799: 797: 796: 791: 789: 781: 773: 765: 726: 724: 723: 718: 716: 698: 696: 695: 690: 688: 670: 668: 667: 662: 660: 642: 640: 639: 634: 622: 620: 619: 614: 612: 597: 595: 594: 589: 577: 575: 574: 569: 567: 552: 550: 549: 544: 532: 530: 529: 524: 522: 507: 505: 504: 499: 487: 485: 484: 479: 477: 469: 461: 317: 315: 296: 294: 123: 122: 119: 116: 113: 92: 87: 86: 76: 69: 68: 63: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1817: 1816: 1815: 1796: 1795: 1763: 1748: 1743: 1711: 1704:have permission 1694: 1668:this simple FaQ 1653: 1629: 1627: 1604: 1524: 1489:Thepurplelefant 1485: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1323: 1316: 1294: 1291: 1272: 1250: 1248: 1246: 1202: 1201: 1156: 1155: 1097: 1096: 1066: 1058: 1053: 1052: 1030: 1029: 1004: 1003: 984: 976: 971: 970: 948: 947: 880: 879: 860: 852: 844: 836: 831: 830: 802: 801: 782: 774: 766: 758: 732: 731: 709: 701: 700: 681: 673: 672: 653: 645: 644: 625: 624: 605: 600: 599: 580: 579: 560: 555: 554: 535: 534: 515: 510: 509: 490: 489: 470: 462: 454: 431: 430: 427: 370: 327: 314: 312:Nousernamesleft 293: 291:Nousernamesleft 232: 214: 166: 120: 117: 114: 111: 110: 88: 81: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 1824: 1822: 1814: 1813: 1808: 1798: 1797: 1794: 1793: 1783:David Eppstein 1762: 1759: 1738: 1737: 1730: 1683: 1682: 1674:Added archive 1652: 1649: 1614:119.252.188.83 1603: 1600: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1572:David Eppstein 1523: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1484: 1481: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1467:David Eppstein 1437:David Eppstein 1432: 1431: 1362: 1345:if and only if 1324: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1271: 1265: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1169: 1166: 1163: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1072: 1069: 1064: 1061: 1040: 1037: 1017: 1014: 1011: 990: 987: 982: 979: 958: 955: 935: 932: 927: 922: 919: 916: 912: 908: 903: 898: 895: 892: 888: 866: 863: 858: 855: 850: 847: 842: 839: 818: 815: 812: 809: 788: 785: 780: 777: 772: 769: 764: 761: 757: 754: 751: 748: 745: 742: 739: 715: 712: 708: 687: 684: 680: 659: 656: 652: 632: 611: 608: 587: 566: 563: 542: 521: 518: 497: 476: 473: 468: 465: 460: 457: 453: 450: 447: 444: 441: 438: 426: 423: 422: 421: 411:David Eppstein 393: 392: 382: 381: 369: 366: 342: 341: 326: 323: 322: 321: 307: 306: 305: 304: 303: 302: 301: 300: 279: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 245:David Eppstein 231: 225: 213: 210: 198:119.252.188.83 188: 185: 165: 162: 153: 152: 149: 148: 145: 144: 133: 127: 126: 124: 107:the discussion 94: 93: 77: 65: 64: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1823: 1812: 1809: 1807: 1804: 1803: 1801: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1760: 1758: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1746: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1715: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1697: 1691: 1686: 1681: 1677: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1656: 1650: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1625: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1601: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1590: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1521: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1482: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1430: 1426: 1422: 1418: 1417:automatically 1414: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1382: 1380: 1379:when produced 1375: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1333: 1328: 1321: 1315: 1310: 1309: 1303: 1298: 1297: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1263: 1256: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1213: 1210: 1207: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1141: 1138: 1135: 1132: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1093: 1092: 1088: 1085: 1070: 1067: 1062: 1059: 1038: 1035: 1015: 1012: 1009: 988: 985: 980: 977: 956: 953: 933: 930: 925: 920: 917: 914: 910: 906: 901: 896: 893: 890: 886: 864: 861: 856: 853: 848: 845: 840: 837: 816: 813: 810: 807: 786: 783: 778: 775: 770: 767: 762: 759: 755: 752: 749: 746: 743: 740: 737: 728: 713: 710: 706: 685: 682: 678: 657: 654: 650: 630: 609: 606: 585: 564: 561: 540: 519: 516: 495: 474: 471: 466: 463: 458: 455: 451: 448: 445: 442: 439: 436: 420: 416: 412: 408: 407: 406: 405: 401: 397: 396:Michael Hardy 391: 390: 386: 380: 379: 378: 376: 367: 365: 364: 360: 356: 355:Vaughan Pratt 351: 348: 340: 336: 335: 334: 332: 320: 313: 309: 308: 299: 292: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 273: 269: 265: 264:Michael Hardy 261: 260: 259: 258: 257: 256: 255: 254: 250: 246: 241: 237: 230: 226: 224: 223: 220: 219:69.174.67.197 211: 209: 207: 203: 199: 195: 187: 183: 181: 176: 175: 169: 163: 161: 160: 142: 138: 132: 129: 128: 125: 108: 104: 100: 99: 91: 85: 80: 78: 75: 71: 70: 66: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1764: 1742: 1739: 1714:source check 1693: 1687: 1684: 1657: 1654: 1633: 1626: 1608:— Preceding 1605: 1586: 1534:142.27.68.70 1528:— Preceding 1525: 1486: 1433: 1416: 1412: 1408: 1389: 1385: 1383: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1330: 1292: 1273: 1251:<ref: --> 1247:Cite error: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1094: 1089: 1086: 729: 428: 394: 374: 371: 352: 346: 343: 337: 328: 233: 215: 192:— Preceding 189: 184: 177: 170: 167: 156: 137:Mid-priority 136: 96: 62:Mid‑priority 40:WikiProjects 1341:perspective 331:style guide 112:Mathematics 103:mathematics 59:Mathematics 1800:Categories 1751:Report bug 1249:There are 1734:this tool 1727:this tool 1359:DynaBlast 1337:triangles 1288:Main Page 1255:help page 1740:Cheers.— 1610:unsigned 1530:unsigned 1453:Jowa fan 1394:Jowa fan 1353:vertices 1343:axially 1295:howcheng 488:, where 236:recently 194:unsigned 1767:Svennik 1664:my edit 1589:Aliotra 1364:Archive 1357:Image: 1339:are in 180:Xah Lee 159:Xah Lee 139:on the 30:C-class 1413:planes 1409:spaces 1390:planes 333:says: 36:scale. 1504:Done 1787:talk 1771:talk 1642:talk 1634:Done 1618:talk 1593:talk 1576:talk 1554:talk 1538:talk 1510:talk 1493:talk 1471:talk 1457:talk 1441:talk 1425:talk 1398:talk 1302:chat 1051:and 969:and 829:and 699:and 598:and 553:and 508:and 415:talk 400:talk 359:talk 268:talk 249:talk 202:talk 1708:RfC 1678:to 1411:by 1325:In 375:not 131:Mid 1802:: 1789:) 1773:) 1721:. 1716:}} 1712:{{ 1644:) 1620:) 1595:) 1578:) 1556:) 1540:) 1512:) 1495:) 1473:) 1459:) 1443:) 1427:) 1400:) 1366:– 1329:, 1257:). 1028:, 1002:, 800:. 756:− 750:− 727:. 671:, 578:, 533:, 452:− 446:− 417:) 402:) 361:) 270:) 251:) 204:) 1785:( 1781:— 1769:( 1753:) 1749:( 1736:. 1729:. 1640:( 1616:( 1591:( 1574:( 1552:( 1536:( 1508:( 1491:( 1469:( 1455:( 1439:( 1435:— 1423:( 1396:( 1304:} 1300:{ 1223:x 1220:i 1217:r 1214:t 1211:a 1208:m 1189:y 1186:r 1183:a 1180:t 1177:n 1174:e 1171:m 1168:e 1165:l 1162:e 1142:y 1139:g 1136:o 1133:l 1130:o 1127:m 1124:o 1121:h 1118:o 1115:e 1112:r 1109:e 1106:t 1103:S 1071:′ 1068:D 1063:′ 1060:A 1039:D 1036:A 1016:. 1013:. 1010:. 989:′ 986:B 981:′ 978:A 957:B 954:A 934:6 931:= 926:2 921:1 918:+ 915:3 911:C 907:= 902:2 897:1 894:+ 891:n 887:C 865:′ 862:D 857:′ 854:C 849:′ 846:B 841:′ 838:A 817:D 814:C 811:B 808:A 787:′ 784:D 779:′ 776:C 771:′ 768:B 763:′ 760:A 753:S 747:D 744:C 741:B 738:A 714:′ 711:C 707:C 686:′ 683:B 679:B 658:′ 655:A 651:A 631:S 610:′ 607:C 586:C 565:′ 562:B 541:B 520:′ 517:A 496:A 475:′ 472:C 467:′ 464:B 459:′ 456:A 449:S 443:C 440:B 437:A 413:( 398:( 357:( 266:( 247:( 200:( 143:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Mathematics
WikiProject icon
icon
Mathematics portal
WikiProject Mathematics
mathematics
the discussion
Mid
project's priority scale
Xah Lee
http://mathsrv.ku-eichstaett.de/MGF/homes/grothmann/java/zirkel/index.html
Xah Lee
unsigned
119.252.188.83
talk
13:08, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
69.174.67.197
05:04, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Perspective (geometry)
recently
Perspective (geometry)
David Eppstein
talk
04:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Michael Hardy
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.