Knowledge

Talk:Dynamical neuroscience

Source đź“ť

433:"The word “Neurodynamics” is a term used here in my consulting firm name (Applied Neurodynamics) to represent a conceptual and eclectic methodological approach to understanding neural network activity, and to use this perspective to bridge from neuroscience to cognitive science, conscious experience and behavior. Conventional neural network architectures are often simplistic feed forward or recurrent models where the timing of events is not important to the processing being done. Dynamics studies causal systems where timing is a key consideration . Dynamics underlies all “computation” which is the preeminent (and overworked) paradigm in all areas of science today ." 245:
for the hordes of neurobiologists :) English is not my first language so do not hesitate to look for errors. Also correct any foolish thing I might have said about dynamical systems, this is what I could understand from what I've read in the last days. To me the important aspect is not that you were wrong about anything relating to dynamical systems but it's more in the tone that was used toward neuroscience as a whole.
116: 22: 64: 176: 78: 158: 53: 411:
which the neural circuits are forced with constant stimuli, with slowly varying stimuli, with periodic stimuli, and with more complex information-bearing stimuli. Analysis of these more complex stimuli of neural circuits goes to the heart of how one is to understand the encoding and transmission of information by nervous systems."
410:
Abstract "The use of methods from contemporary nonlinear dynamics in studying neurobiology has been rather limited.Yet, nonlinear dynamics has become a practical tool for analyzing data and verifying models. This has led to productive coupling of nonlinear dynamics with experiments in neurobiology in
244:
Here's an example of what I would see as a chapter for Computational neuroscience. Feel free to do what you want with it and incorporate new things, this is just a model to show you what I meant when I said you shouldn't present a biased view where dynamical neuroscience comes as a kind of "savior"
271:
Ok, thank you for pitching in. Your changes didn't seem to remove any of the valuable content. I did take a graduate neurobiology course at my university and Izhikevich's criticisms were definitely valid for our local neuroscience program. The professor did of course, mention that what were
272:
learning was wrong every once in a while, but didn't bother us with the details and it might not come as a surprise to you that all my biology friends are afraid of mathematics. But I surely have a skewed view in Alaska, where I had to design my own theoretical neuroscience degree :/
297:
I would say the best part to recuperate here could be the attractors part, considering we remove or clarify the link between attractor types and the behaviors modeled -Jean (snipped and imported by
89:. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the 360:
History might be the most important aspect of this field that I'm missing, and also might give me an opportunity to understand the field better and find out where it belongs.
461: 476: 407:
Current Opinion in Neurobiology, August 2001, Volume 11, Issue 4. Neurodynamics: nonlinear dynamics and neurobiology: Henry D. I. Abarbanel, a and Michael I. Rabinovich
216: 222: 90: 85: 58: 471: 192: 372:. I'm not really sure where it belongs. In my case, I'm coming at it from a neurophysics perspective based on the neurophysics wiki. 183: 163: 466: 456: 250: 337:
excitability section sounds too much like discussion. I'll have to do something about that. I might need to initiate an
63: 422: 388: 33: 361: 246: 140: 21: 39: 376: 365: 278:
Anyway, regardless, there's no reason that viewpoint should be conveyed in an encyclopedia, I agree.
415: 338: 191:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
315:
for example expand the list into sub-sections and give a little more detail on each attractor?
438: 384: 346: 320: 302: 283: 258: 450: 423:
http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=g384811610556546&size=largest
134: 369: 188: 442: 392: 350: 324: 306: 287: 262: 434: 380: 342: 316: 298: 279: 254: 115: 428: 418:, "neurodynamics" was first coined in the 1940's by a cognitive scientist. 130: 175: 157: 77: 52: 15: 114: 404:
ok, I think I found it. The official name of my field:
125: 364:
definitely utilizes it, but it also seems a branch of
187:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 221:This article has not yet received a rating on the 8: 99:Knowledge:WikiProject Articles for creation 19: 429:http://www.appliedneuro.com/#neurodynamics 253:) 20:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC) (imported by 152: 102:Template:WikiProject Articles for creation 83:This article was reviewed by member(s) of 47: 462:AfC submissions by date/30 September 2017 477:Unknown-importance neuroscience articles 154: 49: 7: 181:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 201:Knowledge:WikiProject Neuroscience 14: 472:Start-Class neuroscience articles 204:Template:WikiProject Neuroscience 129:on 30 September 2017 by reviewer 86:WikiProject Articles for creation 174: 156: 76: 62: 51: 20: 123:This article was accepted from 1: 195:and see a list of open tasks. 493: 443:06:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 393:06:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 362:Computational neuroscience 351:08:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC) 325:07:53, 9 August 2010 (UTC) 307:01:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC) 288:01:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC) 263:01:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC) 223:project's importance scale 220: 169: 122: 71: 46: 467:Accepted AfC submissions 457:Start-Class AfC articles 184:WikiProject Neuroscience 119: 28:This article is rated 421:Here's some history: 356:history and placement 247:Jean-Francois Gariepy 207:neuroscience articles 118: 96:Articles for creation 93:for more information. 59:Articles for creation 366:mathematical biology 416:neural oscillations 120: 34:content assessment 396: 379:comment added by 237: 236: 233: 232: 229: 228: 151: 150: 147: 146: 484: 395: 373: 209: 208: 205: 202: 199: 178: 171: 170: 160: 153: 128: 107: 106: 103: 100: 97: 80: 73: 72: 67: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 492: 491: 487: 486: 485: 483: 482: 481: 447: 446: 402: 374: 358: 335: 295: 242: 206: 203: 200: 197: 196: 124: 104: 101: 98: 95: 94: 61: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 490: 488: 480: 479: 474: 469: 464: 459: 449: 448: 401: 398: 357: 354: 334: 331: 330: 329: 328: 327: 294: 291: 276: 275: 274: 273: 241: 238: 235: 234: 231: 230: 227: 226: 219: 213: 212: 210: 193:the discussion 179: 167: 166: 161: 149: 148: 145: 144: 121: 111: 110: 108: 81: 69: 68: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 489: 478: 475: 473: 470: 468: 465: 463: 460: 458: 455: 454: 452: 445: 444: 440: 436: 431: 430: 425: 424: 419: 417: 414:According to 412: 408: 405: 400:Neurodynamics 399: 397: 394: 390: 386: 382: 378: 371: 367: 363: 355: 353: 352: 348: 344: 340: 332: 326: 322: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 308: 304: 300: 292: 290: 289: 285: 281: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 239: 224: 218: 215: 214: 211: 194: 190: 186: 185: 180: 177: 173: 172: 168: 165: 162: 159: 155: 142: 139: 136: 132: 127: 117: 113: 112: 109: 92: 88: 87: 82: 79: 75: 74: 70: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 432: 426: 420: 413: 409: 406: 403: 370:neurophysics 359: 339:Excitability 336: 333:excitability 296: 277: 243: 198:Neuroscience 189:Neuroscience 182: 164:Neuroscience 137: 105:AfC articles 91:project page 84: 40:WikiProjects 375:—Preceding 30:Start-class 451:Categories 126:this draft 341:article. 389:contribs 377:unsigned 240:overview 141:contribs 435:Xurtio 381:Xurtio 343:Xurtio 317:Xurtio 299:Xurtio 280:Xurtio 255:Xurtio 36:scale. 427:from 293:intro 439:talk 385:talk 368:and 347:talk 321:talk 303:talk 284:talk 259:talk 251:talk 135:talk 217:??? 131:Jcc 453:: 441:) 391:) 387:• 349:) 323:) 309:) 305:) 286:) 265:) 261:) 143:). 437:( 383:( 345:( 319:( 301:( 282:( 257:( 249:( 225:. 138:· 133:( 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Articles for creation
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Articles for creation
project page
Note icon
this draft
Jcc
talk
contribs
WikiProject icon
Neuroscience
WikiProject icon
WikiProject Neuroscience
Neuroscience
the discussion
???
project's importance scale
Jean-Francois Gariepy
talk
Xurtio
talk
01:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Xurtio
talk
01:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Xurtio

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑