Talk:EJ DiMera - Knowledge (XXG)

873:

that) and it wasn't until Celeste said it was rape that Sami started calling it rape. Since Ed Scott started the "r" word has only been said once, unlike under Wyman's control where it was spinkled like candy falling out of pinata. That aside, she did unzip her own shirt, he did not have the gun to her head (btw, I appreciate you acknowledging that he didn't exactly have the gun to her head, most seem to insist he did when in reality it was not in his hand at the time), and she did conscent, even though it was unpleasant. Is he a rapist in the purest sense of the word? Not as I see it. He did give her a choice. Did she really have one? That is one thing I don't think a consensus will ever be reached on. I'm no expert, I understand consensus to mean an agreed upon resolution to a problem. You make an intelligent argument, far more so than some I've encountered. I do see where you are coming from. It's a difficult issue at best. When Jack raped Kayla, we saw it, it was rape. When December 29th happened we were left with a gaping hole as to what really happened. In the end, it's hearsay. Legally, he didn't rape her. Emotionally? I still see it as up in the air. Wyman's words at hand are difficult to accept as they were said as he was on his way out the door. It's also difficult that it was said in SOD a publication wiht a strong bias toward it being rape, (see many Carol Hinsey editorials). He could have not even used the word, but we'll never know.

1394:

articles that tie the plot together: the subparts of our total coverage of the series, and NOT PLOT refers only to total coverage. . Myself, I find that the plot of a series such as this is much much easier to understand by going character by character than episode by episode. Going episode by episode has to deal with the fact the episode are written for suspense, and always leaves something inconclusive, and that series like this have multiple threads running at the same time. Knowledge (XXG) writes to be understood, andI think this means the arrangement of the material in a series must be divided up this way, If others think it better other ways, =let them write it the way they want--we're not paper. The wording seems a little diffuse, as is common for plot, and can be tightened by maybe 10%, though it's actually better than most--many need tightening by 50%. As for references, all it has to be referenced to is the original work--plot elements are best sourced from the work itself, except for interpretation. So just add the indication of just what episode the events come in. If I were a scholar of the subject I would want the exact timing for everything, but we usually do not go into such detail. There is, btw, no point tagging with prod, as episode article deletions are not uncontroversial and someone will surely remove the prod tag.

859:, it was rape. The characters say it was rape! How can it not be? Does he have to hold her at gunpoint? Oh yeah he kinda did that. Knife point? Does he have to jump from the woods? Does it have to occur on Lifetime, where every woman is raped? I don't see why EJ can't be included in "fictional rapists" temporarily until it is proven that he did not do so (or retconned), almost everything implies it was rape from the crying to the testimonials. I have no agenda, I'm just perplexed by Knowledge (XXG). I will retract my statement about the producer if it's true. Off Topic: Consensus? A consensus is used to keep order not determine facts. It seems to me information is decided by popular vote rather than being verifiable. When Jack dies (again lol) he should be listed as deceased, not MIA because we know (more or less) he is coming back and a consensus is reached that Jack is in Hawaii. 1069:

for I don't even know how long. NBC credits him as DiMera, etc. The only place I ever see "Wells" used for him anymore is on Knowledge (XXG). And this is all further exacerbated by the fact that there's apparently an actual "E.J. Wells" musician, who probably deserves to have this page to himself, instead of being relegated to "E.J. Wells (musician)" I just don't see the point in continuing to refer to him on Knowledge (XXG) with a name that he simply doesn't go by and hasn't for almost two years. --

824:"Naturally, we don’t expect anyone to forget about the RAPE, nor do we expect anyone to take EJ’s RAPE of Sami lightly,” notes former CO-EXECUTIVE PRODUCER Stephen Wyman. “However, we know life goes on. People can change. At some point, the issue of the RAPE is going to have to be dealt with in the fundamental way, but meanwhile, there is the audience that wants to see EJ and Sami together. they aren’t forgetting about the RAPE, either.” 81: 249: 231: 22: 1414:, which is very bad to begin with. I have tendency to tag it for deletion, but I fear negativity, despite my best intentions. Oh... if this article stays longer, then I won't know the real meaning of Knowledge (XXG). However, this article does not meet the standards of encyclopedia. This character is significant to the DiMera/Brady feud, but no sources have covered him at all. Look at 895:"An affair is an affair?" No, an affair is generally thought of as a long time occurrance between two people in love when it comes to soaps. EJ and Kate technically only did it once so techically they are either a one night stand or short lived affair but they are not simply an "affair." The section is to describe a character's relationship and generalized terms do not do that. 71: 155: 53: 1099:

that helpful or informative? I think a date should be set (a day in the near future, mind) where if he's not called E.J. Wells again by this time, this article gets moved. It's ridiculous that an actual notable person named "E.J. Wells" gets delegated to "E.J. Wells (musician)" so that someone who's not even called "E.J. Wells" anymore, can get this page. --

173: 1098:

Well, in looking at this thread is there any but YOU who thinks he should remain Wells? You are the sole person arguing to every comment questioning why this is not changed. I think this is ridiculous and makes this page plain inaccurate. We're calling him something that no one else calls him. Why is

1002:

What does? NBC crediting him as that? Everyone in the show referring to him as that? We have all that. What else do you need? Seriously, that's ridiculous. It's NBC's word against... yours, that his name is E.J. DiMera. Lucas' page has been changed to Lucas Horton, and he's way more connected to the

606:

Your tone in how you respond to people on Knowledge (XXG) when upset (or, in this, case trying to gloat), with vile attacks, is highly inappropriate. You have been warned about that before. Keep it up, and you will not be on Knowledge (XXG) for much longer (especially if you keep moving articles from

486:

Well I am not a troll, and as you can see I did not change any of the information on this page. I did not edit any of it. All I did was simply state what I saw in the credits and see where it may lead.I haven't been in here recently but the people I usually interact with are very helpful.They are not

1613:

Well first off, parenthicals are not allowed unless they label (adoptive) or (legal) or even (miscarriage); all others are not to be used. So why people continue to use them is beyond my imagination. Do I believe they're retconning the storyline? Of course! Do I believe Stefano is EJ's father? No. I

1238:

By the way, are you King Gemini? I find it highly suspect that this article would be moved the same day you comment again about this and point a finger at me being the only one opposed to this move. If you are him, learn to follow Knowledge (XXG) common name policy and know that things should not be

1068:

He has? The first suggestion of making this page E.J. DiMera instead of Wells, came over a year ago now, and even by that point he'd been being called DiMera for a while. He's only been on the show since 2006 and it was in 2007 that the name "DiMera" started replacing Wells. And it hasn't been Wells

1037:

Well, it's been two months since then. He's still called E.J. DiMera on the show, he's still credited as E.J. DiMera in the credits, and the name "E.J. Wells" hasn't been spoken in probably about a year on the show. At what point do we cede the face that the name "E.J. Wells" is apparently dead, and

872:

The issue, as I see it, and yes, opinion could be used there, is that EJ has not been convicted of rape, it is hearsay. It's he said/she said. He only said it when pushed. Sami says it in defense but has told GOD that she made a deal. She said she would do it again (most rape victims wouldn't say

840:

The rape is addressed in the EJ and Sami article, you are free to edit that article. A concensus was reached to not include EJ in the catagory of fictional rapists as there is still question in regards to the incident, the full incident was never shown. ADDITIONALLY, the quote is from a VERY FIRED

669:

Soap Central is a fan site like any other. They are not prevy to "secret" information and has fan volunteers who create their pages. The birthdate listed at SC is a fan decided date, not one presented by NBC. They have been very vague about how old EJ is because of the SORAS situation and the ire

1634:

It was infact, revealed today August,21,2012 that Stefano IS EJ's father. Today Ian was holding Stefano and EJ captive in a room, and Ian admitted that he forged the blood work and Alice Horton's letter saying Stefano was not EJ's father. Ian went on to say at the very end of the episode to EJ that

1597:

And already the unsourced edits come claiming Stefano is not EJ's father. But was there a DNA test? This is retconned, and bad story telling in my opinion, as Stefano ENGINEERED EJ to be his son. I say in the infobox section, we don't change anything and add unnecessary parenthicals. Obviously, the

1502:

be so, but I agree with you it is very unlikely to be so in this case. I meant rather that often presenting the plot character by character is better than episode by episode, or at least complements it, and that we should do both for fiction that is worth the trouble. How they're divided up into

1393:

Sure, it's unbalanced: it needs the production information about exactly which episodes he appears in and which not, and for reception there's probably something to say about the critical views, though the sources tend to be only borderline reliable. Character articles, however, are essentially

826:

Wow, and this why I will never officially join wikipedia. Characters say scene is the one thing, the script implies the very same thing, it seems blatantly obvious, the executive producer verifies it and yet because the fans/wikiphiles say it is not so it simply is not so. Thank you Knowledge (XXG)

729:

It is sanctioned, but that's an issue for another time. ;) Technically, the site does spell the name the same way that NBC does -- end credits show that he is listed as E.J. Wells. NBC is inconsistent with the way that E.J.'s name is referenced -- he has been listed as both EJ Wells and E.J. Wells.

1316:. Also, there are too many details about this fictional character. Also, currents sources may be unreliable and primarily affiliated with this topic. Reliable sources have yet to be found. I wanted to discuss this in any WikiProject, but any of their talk pages in this talk page appears obscure. -- 1083:

Look at the discussions above. Obviously...the name Wells had not started being replaced by DiMera that successfully in 2007. It has not been two years since he has gone by Wells, or even almost two years. Almost a year I will give you, sure, but he was still going by it/being referred to by it at

711:

Actually, soapcentral.com is not sanctioned by NBC and their information is often inaccurate. They've often called for fans to help update character profiles. A sactioned site would not ask for that and would spell the name the same way NBC spells the name. The date of 1997 is not in dispute by

1442:

I agree it is desirable to find secondary sources for plot. It's certainly not absolutely necessary, for the work itself is a RS, but it is very helpful/ You assert there are none, but do you mean that there are presently none, or that you have verified that there are none to be had? Or are you

420:

Yes I am, wow you know all my information but yet I don't know anything about you. Thats rather creepy.I am fine with the comment name things, AGAIN I was just pointing out the change in the credits.I get it common names, yes I got it the first time and the next 5 times you mentioned it. I wonder

596:

Why did you not reply down below where you were debating with me as an IP? What I have to say is down there. It is EJ DiMera, you say? Well, it is also EJ Wells...considering that fiction is always happening in the present. Meaning that when a person watches clips of EJ in his early years, he is

1556:

too few for anything much bigger than a stub. IMHO, the plot stuff could all be removed - or at the very least, drastically pruned. When that's gone, we have to ask what "meat" is left. I suspect that at the end of that process, this article should probably be deleted - if there is so little

1476:

I'll rephrase: "Notability of this character is more important than the plot itself. I couldn't find sources that determine notability of this character. Marlena Evans and Mark Dalton are notable, and their articles resemble the standards of professional encyclopedia articles. This topic is not

501:

Credits are independent based on location. The credits shown in Canada look nothing like what the credits in the US on NBC and those look nothing like SoapNet. The name is based on common name and the best source is the official website. Now I'm done repeating myself over this. Lastly, you

1020:

In some more months, if EJ is still being referred to as EJ DiMera, then it may be okay to move this article to EJ DiMera or EJ Wells DiMera. But he had been known as EJ Wells for 2 years vs. now being known as EJ DiMera. Thus, I do not see how EJ DiMera is yet his common name (as in his most

624:

On July 12, 2012, John Black referred to EJ as "Elvis John," which of course makes sense given that the man's initials are "E. J." I think maybe the middle name should be removed from the lead, and the information about the conflicting middle names given for the character can be put in the

467:

Becoming a member isn't hard. But you can find you on google without being a member. And you're assuming Google was the only way I found out the info. We've had quite a troll problem here, of course I would see if there was additional information about someone out there. Check out

765:

it is redundant to use the word again and again in the article. It is clear that this is not a real person and the information in the article is about fictional character. Other pages for characters do not include an over use of the word. I feel it is unnecessary to do so on this

1171:

As for E.J. Wells (musician), this character had this article first. But this article could have easily been moved to EJ Wells (character) in order to give the "actual notable person" the EJ Wells title. In any case, you got your wish and this article is now titled EJ Dimera.

1614:

never believed it actually. It didn't fit at all. I think until we go further into the storyline, we leave Stefano as the father. And DNA tests, in soap operas, really prove nothing. They can be changed months/years down-the-line. It's usually never a set-in-stone idea.

803:

Can I have a link to this glorious discussion where EJ was said NOT to be a rapist. Sami said he did, Roman did, Lucas did, the man himself said he did. And I know if I pulled this in real life I would be a rapist. I just have to see the justification and fan wankery on

1635:

they (EJ&Stefano) are father and son in spirit and by blood. I guess whomever wants to verify my statement can watch Tuesdays August 21,2012 episode on the NBC website when they put the episode up for streaming. It's in the last five minutes of the episode. --

688:

is one presented by NBC -- because it's the date that the character was born on-air (20 February 1997). They don't give an age for how old he is supposed to be now, only when the character was initially introduced. Unlike many other fan sites,

1598:

show is expecting us to believe yet ANOTHER ill conceived retcon, just like John and Hope being married. But we, the editors of this article, have the right to put in what we want to, as long as we all agree on it. What does everyone think?

1443:

actually asserting you can find no secondary sources this, unlike other characters in the series. Even without going further, have you checked the sources listed in the article you rightly like, to see if they cover this character also?

1117:

suddenly started calling himself S-Man and was then known as S-Man for a few years with no one calling him Superman anymore, would that mean that we should move his article to S-Man? Of course not. Why? Because Superman is his common

516:

Well I get that the credits are different. And for the last time I was not changing anything just pointing it out.Well I had no idea about my "stellar reputation" until you pointed it out in my talk page, otherwise I would have never

1551:

acceptable to blindly remove all unreferenced facts. That said, the article as a whole needs a reasonable number of references in order to demonstrate notability and to provide a basic backbone of checkability. Two references is

697:

is one of the few that is officially sanctioned and has a direct relationship with NBC. Their information regarding characters comes directly from what is presented on-screen, which cannot be said of many fan sites.

435:

Google! Not creepy. It's Google. I have learned to check a lot of people that comment/edit the EJ and Sami pages. You google. You have the same name at the EJami fan site as here. Not hard to learn about you.

324:

Can you guys please not put that EJ and Sami are soulmates the wiki page is suppose to remain neutral, not put the incorrect information. Please just give it time these two will be together but be right about the

487:

quick to lecture me, but anywho I really don't care about how you get the info, Im just pleased that obviously I was important enough for you to look me up, and be well aware of my reputation on certain boards.

625:"Backstory" section. Also, is there any source for the "Elvis Aron Banks" name? If the middle name was never used when the character's last name was "Banks," then is this really a valid construction? -- 1003:

last name "Roberts" than E.J. is to the last name "Wells". "Wells" is just a stupid fake name he used as a racecar driver so no one would know he was a DiMera. It's a pseudonym. It's not even his name.--

776:

I agree with IrishLass. Redundancy is not appropriate in a Knowledge (XXG) article. This article does make it clear that it is a page for a soap opera and that the characters are fictional.

654:

again, please stop putting Bonnie, Billie, and Chelsea as significant romances. If every person someone kissed was listed in "significant romances" the charcter pages would go one forever.

644:

Please stop putting Bonnie, Chelsea, and Billie as romances. Bonnie and Chelsea grabbed EJ and kissed him, there was no romance. EJ kissed Billie to thank her. That is also not romantic.

1674: 1557:

written about this character - then it's hardly notable enough to be discussed here. Simply listing the plot points at which he appears does not constitute an encyclopedia article.

1523:? Well, I agree: character lists rarely present info, but they not yet have established notability as itself. There should not be currently list of characters without sources. -- 406:

AGAIN, not on my version. Common names are what Knowledge (XXG) goes by, not what EJami fans want. And, yes, Perfecttlovee, I know you're an EJami fan from an EJami board.

1798: 265: 1793: 1706: 1702: 1688: 1773: 131: 1017:

It's not my word. Look above at Knowledge (XXG) policy about common names. The Lucas Roberts article will once again be changed to Lucas Roberts, as it should be.

137: 256: 236: 1503:

articles is not critical; presenting the full information is critical. My objection to character lists is that they rarely present full enough information.

881:

So, with all that said, I am just going by what others agreed to. But I understand your argument. Thank you for presenting it in an intelligent manner.

1675:

https://web.archive.org/web/20130928213254/http://social.entertainment.msn.com/tv/blogs/tv-buzz-blogpost.aspx?post=62d4b39c-e9b3-4911-b476-0cf79e5ab753

1280:

As I put it above I will put it down here to, On the April 10th episode of Days of Our Lives it was revealed that his full name is Elvis Aron DiMera.

1788: 197: 1783: 1778: 1768: 103: 1422:; short and stubby, but superior than a plot-only article like EJ article, right? Which one is more encyclopedic: this article or Mark Dalton? -- 107: 1678: 988:

The character going by a new name for months and months (when it is, after all, only months) does not make that name his or her common name.

975: 1039: 1004: 974:

Okay, now even NBC cites him as E.J. DiMera. He hasn't gone by "Wells" for months and months, when is it going to be okay to move this? --

193: 180: 160: 335:

It's ridiculous. It's biased and it can't be on this page. Anyone who does it needs to stop! I'm getting tired of switching it around. --

1410:...I have a tendency to remove all plot, but I can't yet until everyone agrees; unfortunately, everyone favors having fictional element 1359:

to indicate this topic's impact on the media. I haven't been interested with this character, so I don't know what else to say or do. --

94: 58: 1636: 1100: 702: 1684:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

1070: 743: 734: 374:

Per NBC owner of the character EJ Wells name is EJ. It is not initials, it stands for nothing. It is his name. Please reference

597:

known as EJ Wells right there for that viewer. Your main problem is that you often treat fictional characters as if they are real.

1296: 566: 306:, it lists his occupation as a racecar driver, but I do not know it if it's outdated or not. I'm unclear what is happening with 550:

On the April 10th episode of Days of Our Lives it was revealed that EJ's full name is Elvis Aron DiMera, not EJ Wells DiMera.

33: 1419: 1749: 1520: 382:(bottom right video description of character name). Please correct from E. J. to EJ per NBC's naming of the character. 1547:

when a fact is likely to be challenged. You don't have to reference that the sky is blue or that 2+2=4. Hence it is

785:

For one, it's victims. Two, EJ has not been charged with any crime so you can not put assumptions. You can only put

502:

weren't important enough for me to look you up, I knew you from FL and your stellar reputation is only in your head.

310:, so I don't know if he is no longer apart of his company or not. If someone could fix this, I'd appreciate it. -- 1481:

in non-primary sources, and this article consists of only plots. I tried Google, but I found none significant. --

979: 712:

this editor but there is another editor who keeps changing the date to 1979 and assuming the character's age now.

1705:

to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the

939: 1572: 1043: 1008: 39: 21: 1740: 1679:

http://social.entertainment.msn.com/tv/blogs/tv-buzz-blogpost.aspx?post=62d4b39c-e9b3-4911-b476-0cf79e5ab753

1666: 1640: 1104: 522: 492: 458: 426: 397: 1284: 1074: 554: 1662: 739:

Editted/updated to add: That's the downside of soaps. Even they can't decide who their characters are. ;)

645: 383: 360: 1724:

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with

1712: 962: 671: 655: 587: 507: 477: 441: 411: 264:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

1665:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit 359:

Even EJami fans agree putting "soulmate" is wrong. I agree that that should not be put in the article.

1543:

One thing we almost always miss about the rules on referencing is that references are only absolutely

1054:

Hmm, we'll see. No matter that he's EJ DiMera now, he's still been known as EJ Wells longer thus far.

860: 828: 815: 805: 1562: 1373:

Another thing: I think I cannot find reliable sources or significant coverages in Google to indicate

1292: 562: 1615: 1580: 1528: 1486: 1427: 1382: 1364: 1321: 762: 947: 920: 896: 767: 630: 518: 488: 469: 454: 422: 393: 326: 1709:

before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template

913: 375: 1725: 716: 1244: 1177: 1089: 1059: 1026: 993: 935: 612: 86: 1350: 1346: 1313: 1336: 958: 882: 842: 790: 713: 583: 503: 473: 437: 407: 336: 311: 261: 1732: 931: 450:

Well its nice to know you have your own system of tracking people down. Still very creepy.

1603: 1558: 1288: 841:

bitter executive and the new executive is taking the story in a very different direction.

558: 192:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit

99: 1519:

Can you elaborate "character by character" and "plot by plot" please? Do we already have

1356: 421:

when you are going to get that I was simply pointing something out not changing anything.

1377:

for this topic. I barely have enough energy or interest to find sources in libraries. --

1691:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by 1576: 1524: 1482: 1423: 1378: 1360: 1317: 303:

I added the information box, but I didn't know what to put for E.J.'s occupation. From

1731:

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with

1698: 1374: 1312:

This article lacks real-world context and consists of only storylines, which violates

1113:

I go by common name policy, noted above. It is not about me, nor is it ridiculous. If

1762: 1510: 1498:

I didn't mean that the importance of this character is greater than the plot--it can

1450: 1418:; non-primary sources signify her notability, despite flaws in that article. Look at 1415: 1401: 943: 916: 740: 731: 699: 626: 453:

But anyways you can't see that information unless you are a memeber very interesting.

80: 1240: 1173: 1085: 1055: 1022: 989: 608: 351: 1332: 248: 230: 102:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can 1331:

i agree it looks like its all unreferenced too. what did you want to discuss??

98:, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Knowledge (XXG) articles about 1697:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than 1599: 786: 761:

As the article starts out with the indication that this is an article about a

670:

it has created in some fans. At this time EJ's age and birthdate are unknown.

189: 185: 76: 304: 1658: 1644: 1607: 379: 582:

what you fools got to say? Like me and other users said, it is EJ DiMera.

184:, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about 1505: 1445: 1396: 1114: 172: 154: 1345:

Whether I must removed the unsource statements, tag this article with

70: 52: 392:

In the credits as of November 19, 2007, he is credited as EJ DiMera.

1754: 1628: 1584: 1566: 1532: 1514: 1490: 1454: 1431: 1405: 1386: 1368: 1340: 1325: 1300: 1248: 1181: 1108: 1093: 1078: 1063: 1047: 1030: 1012: 997: 983: 966: 951: 924: 899: 885: 863: 845: 831: 818: 808: 793: 770: 674: 658: 648: 634: 616: 591: 570: 526: 511: 496: 481: 462: 445: 430: 415: 401: 386: 363: 354: 339: 329: 314: 15: 376:

http://www.nbc.com/Days_of_our_Lives/features/dimera/ej.shtml

957:

This page has now been fully move-protected for two weeks.

1669:

for additional information. I made the following changes:

1575:. Maybe I must merge/redirect this article into target. -- 915:. Changing and moving is not based on policy or NBC. 814:

haha, nevermind. I found it. lol. This is fantastic.

472:

you might understand why people would be suspicious.

1349:, or something else. Otherwise, first, we must find 680:

Actually, the birthdate listed for the character at

260:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 1701:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors 136:This article has not yet received a rating on the 938:as Wells. Moving the page goes against policy, 274:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Fictional characters 106:. To improve this article, please refer to the 1687:This message was posted before February 2018. 912:As far as NBC is concerned, he's still Wells 8: 378:where you will see his name as well as here 196:, where you can join the project and/or the 19: 1657:I have just modified one external link on 1239:changed just because you want them to be. 789:information into a Knowledge (XXG) article 225: 149: 47: 1799:WikiProject Fictional characters articles 277:Template:WikiProject Fictional characters 1794:Start-Class fictional character articles 380:http://iw.rtm.com/daytimefeud/videos.htm 227: 206:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Soap Operas 151: 49: 1774:Unknown-importance television articles 116:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Television 7: 254:This article is within the scope of 178:This article is within the scope of 92:This article is within the scope of 1357:third-party and independent sources 827:for once again proving your worth. 38:It is of interest to the following 1308:Problematic issues of this article 1021:well-known name to the audience). 14: 1661:. Please take a moment to review 1789:WikiProject Soap Operas articles 257:WikiProject Fictional characters 247: 229: 209:Template:WikiProject Soap Operas 171: 153: 79: 69: 51: 20: 1784:Start-Class soap opera articles 1779:WikiProject Television articles 1769:Start-Class television articles 119:Template:WikiProject Television 891:Relationship with Kate Roberts 886:00:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 864:23:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 848:23:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 846:23:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 832:23:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 819:23:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 809:22:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC) 1: 1420:Mark Dalton (All My Children) 1387:23:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 1369:23:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 1341:22:59, 28 December 2011 (UTC) 1326:19:57, 24 December 2011 (UTC) 1048:20:29, 14 February 2009 (UTC) 1031:14:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC) 1013:08:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 998:22:50, 13 December 2008 (UTC) 984:07:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC) 967:15:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 952:05:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 925:05:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 527:18:20, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 512:12:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 497:05:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 482:01:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 463:01:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 446:01:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 431:01:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC) 416:22:47, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 402:02:29, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 268:and see a list of open tasks. 1755:01:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC) 1585:02:23, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 1567:00:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC) 280:fictional character articles 1645:05:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC) 1533:02:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 1515:01:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC) 1491:02:12, 4 January 2012 (UTC) 1455:22:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 1432:06:23, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 1406:05:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC) 900:19:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 744:12:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 735:06:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 717:23:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 703:08:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 578:HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!! 1815: 1718:(last update: 5 June 2024) 1654:Hello fellow Wikipedians, 1301:18:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 1094:22:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC) 1079:05:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC) 1064:20:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 794:23:57, 9 August 2007 (UTC) 771:15:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 754:Redundant Use of the word 571:18:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC) 330:00:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC) 138:project's importance scale 1592: 675:17:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 659:12:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 635:19:57, 26 July 2012 (UTC) 315:06:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC) 242: 166: 135: 64: 46: 1573:EJ DiMera and Sami Brady 1521:EJ Dimera and Sami Brady 1249:14:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 1182:14:22, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 1038:he's E.J. DiMera now? -- 649:17:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 617:23:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 592:21:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC) 387:17:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC) 364:03:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC) 355:10:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC) 340:22:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC) 1650:External links modified 1629:16:58, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1608:05:23, 4 May 2012 (UTC) 1109:07:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC) 194:WikiProject Soap Operas 181:WikiProject Soap Operas 942:, and NBC's own page. 95:WikiProject Television 28:This article is rated 1479:significantly covered 1084:some points in 2008. 607:their common names). 308:Mythic Communications 110:for the type of work. 32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1699:regular verification 855:My point is that it 271:Fictional characters 262:fictional characters 237:Fictional characters 1689:After February 2018 930:He's also credited 763:fictional character 212:soap opera articles 122:television articles 104:join the discussion 100:television programs 1743:InternetArchiveBot 1694:InternetArchiveBot 1352:real-world context 470:User:Grant Chuggle 34:content assessment 1719: 1304: 1287:comment added by 574: 557:comment added by 296: 295: 292: 291: 288: 287: 224: 223: 220: 219: 148: 147: 144: 143: 87:Television portal 1806: 1753: 1744: 1717: 1716: 1695: 1624: 1622: 1303: 1281: 573: 551: 282: 281: 278: 275: 272: 251: 244: 243: 233: 226: 214: 213: 210: 207: 204: 175: 168: 167: 157: 150: 124: 123: 120: 117: 114: 108:style guidelines 89: 84: 83: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 1814: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1759: 1758: 1747: 1742: 1710: 1703:have permission 1693: 1667:this simple FaQ 1652: 1625: 1620: 1618: 1595: 1571:Ahem! There is 1310: 1282: 976:216.141.250.216 940:WP:Common names 910: 893: 801: 783: 759: 667: 642: 584:The King Gemini 552: 372: 322: 301: 279: 276: 273: 270: 269: 211: 208: 205: 202: 201: 121: 118: 115: 112: 111: 85: 78: 29: 12: 11: 5: 1812: 1810: 1802: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1781: 1776: 1771: 1761: 1760: 1737: 1736: 1729: 1682: 1681: 1673:Added archive 1651: 1648: 1632: 1631: 1617: 1594: 1593:EJ's Paternity 1591: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1371: 1309: 1306: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1040:76.167.247.229 1018: 1005:99.141.243.137 955: 954: 934:as Wells, and 909: 906: 904: 892: 889: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 867: 866: 850: 849: 837: 836: 835: 834: 800: 797: 782: 779: 778: 777: 758: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 737: 722: 721: 720: 719: 706: 705: 666: 663: 662: 661: 646:75.181.107.214 641: 638: 622: 621: 620: 619: 601: 600: 599: 598: 548: 547: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 535: 534: 533: 532: 531: 530: 529: 384:75.181.107.214 371: 368: 367: 366: 361:75.181.107.214 357: 343: 342: 321: 318: 300: 297: 294: 293: 290: 289: 286: 285: 283: 266:the discussion 252: 240: 239: 234: 222: 221: 218: 217: 215: 176: 164: 163: 158: 146: 145: 142: 141: 134: 128: 127: 125: 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1811: 1800: 1797: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1785: 1782: 1780: 1777: 1775: 1772: 1770: 1767: 1766: 1764: 1757: 1756: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1734: 1730: 1727: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1714: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1655: 1649: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1630: 1627: 1626: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1541: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1517: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1501: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1447: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1421: 1417: 1416:Marlena Evans 1413: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1210: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1116: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1091: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1001: 1000: 999: 995: 991: 987: 986: 985: 981: 977: 973: 972: 971: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 953: 949: 945: 941: 937: 933: 929: 928: 927: 926: 922: 918: 914: 907: 905: 902: 901: 898: 897:IrishLass0128 890: 888: 887: 884: 871: 870: 869: 868: 865: 862: 858: 854: 853: 852: 851: 847: 844: 839: 838: 833: 830: 825: 822: 821: 820: 817: 813: 812: 811: 810: 807: 799:EJ/ nonsense. 798: 796: 795: 792: 788: 780: 775: 774: 773: 772: 769: 768:IrishLass0128 764: 757: 753: 745: 742: 738: 736: 733: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 718: 715: 710: 709: 708: 707: 704: 701: 696: 692: 687: 683: 679: 678: 677: 676: 673: 672:65.13.237.254 664: 660: 657: 656:65.13.237.254 653: 652: 651: 650: 647: 639: 637: 636: 632: 628: 618: 614: 610: 605: 604: 603: 602: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 581: 577: 576: 575: 572: 568: 564: 560: 556: 528: 524: 520: 519:Perfecttlovee 515: 514: 513: 509: 505: 500: 499: 498: 494: 490: 489:Perfecttlovee 485: 484: 483: 479: 475: 471: 466: 465: 464: 460: 456: 455:Perfecttlovee 452: 451: 449: 448: 447: 443: 439: 434: 433: 432: 428: 424: 423:Perfecttlovee 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 405: 404: 403: 399: 395: 394:Perfecttlovee 391: 390: 389: 388: 385: 381: 377: 369: 365: 362: 358: 356: 353: 349: 345: 344: 341: 338: 334: 333: 332: 331: 328: 327:Perfecttlovee 319: 317: 316: 313: 309: 305: 298: 284: 267: 263: 259: 258: 253: 250: 246: 245: 241: 238: 235: 232: 228: 216: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 182: 177: 174: 170: 169: 165: 162: 159: 156: 152: 139: 133: 130: 129: 126: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 82: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 1741: 1738: 1713:source check 1692: 1686: 1683: 1656: 1653: 1637:98.87.91.193 1633: 1616: 1596: 1553: 1548: 1544: 1504: 1499: 1478: 1475: 1444: 1411: 1395: 1351: 1311: 1279: 1101:76.90.25.172 956: 911: 903: 894: 880: 856: 823: 802: 784: 760: 755: 694: 690: 685: 681: 668: 643: 623: 579: 549: 373: 347: 325:information. 323: 307: 302: 255: 179: 93: 40:WikiProjects 1283:—Preceding 1071:76.90.29.62 959:Daniel Case 883:CelticGreen 861:70.19.29.65 843:CelticGreen 829:70.19.29.65 816:70.19.29.65 806:70.19.29.65 791:CelticGreen 714:CelticGreen 553:—Preceding 504:CelticGreen 474:CelticGreen 438:CelticGreen 408:CelticGreen 348:Miss Burkle 346:Well said, 337:Miss Burkle 312:Miss Burkle 203:Soap Operas 190:telenovelas 186:soap operas 161:Soap Operas 30:Start-class 1763:Categories 1750:Report bug 1559:SteveBaker 1375:notability 1289:Lilypada94 787:verifiable 559:Lilypada94 299:Occupation 198:discussion 113:Television 59:Television 1733:this tool 1726:this tool 1659:EJ DiMera 1577:George Ho 1525:George Ho 1500:sometimes 1483:George Ho 1424:George Ho 1379:George Ho 1361:George Ho 1318:George Ho 756:Fictional 1739:Cheers.— 1545:required 1297:contribs 1285:unsigned 1115:Superman 944:KellyAna 917:KellyAna 857:happened 693:central. 684:central. 627:DavidK93 567:contribs 555:unsigned 320:Soulmate 1663:my edit 1314:WP:PLOT 1241:Flyer22 1174:Flyer22 1086:Flyer22 1056:Flyer22 1023:Flyer22 990:Flyer22 781:Victums 741:D'Amico 732:D'Amico 700:D'Amico 640:Romance 609:Flyer22 352:Flyer22 1333:Bouket 517:known. 36:scale. 1621:Freak 1619:Music 1600:Rm994 1511:talk 1451:talk 1412:first 1402:talk 1355:from 1118:name. 908:WELLS 804:this. 766:page. 1641:talk 1623:7676 1604:talk 1581:talk 1563:talk 1529:talk 1487:talk 1428:talk 1383:talk 1365:talk 1347:PROD 1337:talk 1322:talk 1293:talk 1245:talk 1178:talk 1105:talk 1090:talk 1075:talk 1060:talk 1044:talk 1027:talk 1009:talk 994:talk 980:talk 963:talk 948:talk 936:here 932:here 921:talk 691:soap 682:soap 631:talk 613:talk 588:talk 563:talk 523:talk 508:talk 493:talk 478:talk 459:talk 442:talk 427:talk 412:talk 398:talk 370:Name 188:and 1707:RfC 1677:to 1554:far 1549:not 1506:DGG 1446:DGG 1397:DGG 695:com 686:com 665:Age 580:Now 132:??? 1765:: 1720:. 1715:}} 1711:{{ 1643:) 1606:) 1583:) 1565:) 1531:) 1513:) 1489:) 1453:) 1430:) 1404:) 1385:) 1367:) 1339:) 1324:) 1299:) 1295:• 1247:) 1180:) 1107:) 1092:) 1077:) 1062:) 1046:) 1029:) 1011:) 996:) 982:) 965:) 950:) 923:) 633:) 615:) 590:) 569:) 565:• 525:) 510:) 495:) 480:) 461:) 444:) 429:) 414:) 400:) 350:. 1752:) 1748:( 1735:. 1728:. 1639:( 1602:( 1579:( 1561:( 1527:( 1509:( 1485:( 1449:( 1426:( 1400:( 1381:( 1363:( 1335:( 1320:( 1291:( 1243:( 1176:( 1103:( 1088:( 1073:( 1058:( 1042:( 1025:( 1007:( 992:( 978:( 961:( 946:( 919:( 629:( 611:( 586:( 561:( 521:( 506:( 491:( 476:( 457:( 440:( 425:( 410:( 396:( 200:. 140:. 42::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index