Knowledge

Talk:Enugu/GA1

Source 📝

162: 230:
Thank you, Ukabia, for your hard work. I am pleased with the work you have done in fixing the references. There is one possible problem with the grammar of the text of the article, and for that, I will be requesting a second opinion from another editor. There are multiple occurrences in the text
388:
As the original reviewer has abandoned, not responding to messages, despite being active at present, I have reviewed the article. The original reviewer's concerns have been met, there are no outstanding objections from the second opinion, so I am happy to close this as as a pass.
404:
I'm very sorry I didn't realize what was going on. I thought the person giving the second opinion was responsible for passing/failing an article. I'm very sorry to have caused long waiting and extra work for people. But I'm glad to see it passed! Good work Ukabia!
288:
Having said that, I would not consider the use of a comma after the date at the start of the sentence to be a hindrance to meaning and so not worth removing. I see it as largely personal preference. If the meaning is not altered, then it doesn't matter -
251:
trend to loose the commas for short clauses such as the one in the example. This is not the first time I've come across an article written in British English that does not use commas in these cases, so I'm wondering if it is more than coincidence.
165:
which mentions the word "Ngwo" twice, however in neither of the two cases is the existence of an alternative name of "Enugu Ngwo" mentioned. As long as the alternative name "Enugu Ngwo" remains unsourced it can be assumed that this is
267:
I would consider the date to be a parenthetical phrase, and so if the date appears at the start or end of a sentence does not need a comma, though if it appears in the middle would need a comma before and after.
208:
to differentiate it with this village. I've change the text to "the Enugu Ngwo area" so this village would not be confused as the city and it would be indicated as a settlement established before the city.
204:
as this was a mistake). The Igbo language uses an orthography that requires accents. The article goes on to explain that the cities name that is located beside the Enugu Ngwo was later changed to
108:
I have found several broken links in the article. The broken references are as followed: 44, 55, 67, 68, 70, 97, 112, 117, 118, 120, 125 (as of the August 25, 2010
367:)), the second opinion has been acknowledged and any issues have been solved. I've left a message on the reviewers talk page, but there's no reply yet. 112:
of the article.) I have not yet completed my review of the article, but those links need to be addressed in the mean time. Thanks! --
347: 192:
for being the village of which coal was found beside. The source also explains the meaning of the name of the city which is spelled
66: 62: 336:
There's been nothing posted here in a few weeks. Is the review done? Is the article at a stage of passing/failing?
47: 410: 364: 257: 117: 90: 39: 394: 105: 406: 360: 253: 113: 86: 327: 189: 390: 374: 240: 216: 175: 144: 248: 337: 317:
mean the same thing, and do not cause any confusion for the reader. I hope that helps.
320: 167: 150: 369: 211: 171: 147: 55: 17: 281:"Enugu became, in 1938, the administrative capital of the Eastern Province." 310:"In 1938, Enugu became the administrative capital of the Eastern Province." 296:"In 1938 Enugu became the administrative capital of the Eastern Province." 278:"Enugu became the administrative capital of the Eastern Province in 1938." 275:"In 1938 Enugu became the administrative capital of the Eastern Province." 235:"In 1938 Enugu became the administrative capital of the Eastern Province" 141:"....Enugu Ngwo as it was known then, became a major coal mining area..." 231:
where dependent clauses are not separated by a comma. For example,
158: 154: 136: 32: 414: 398: 377: 353: 330: 261: 219: 179: 121: 94: 153:
provided to back up the inclusion of the alternative name.
157:, which is used as a source in the first paragraph of the 135:. Also, within the article, in the first paragraph of the 109: 74: 43: 131:In the infobox an alternative name is written: 8: 243:upbringing, a comma should be placed after 7: 139:section, the following is written: 24: 247:. But I'm wondering if it is a 378:19:00, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 354:05:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 331:18:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC) 262:02:06, 8 September 2010 (UTC) 220:16:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC) 415:15:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 399:15:26, 2 October 2010 (UTC) 180:12:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC) 122:03:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC) 95:01:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC) 431: 127:Unsourced alternative name 359:It's up to the reviewer ( 100:Problems with sources 161:section, leads to a 349:Operation Big Bear 196:in Igbo, used for 168:original research 422: 350: 344: 329: 323: 241:American English 79: 70: 51: 430: 429: 425: 424: 423: 421: 420: 419: 386: 352: 348: 338: 321: 318: 249:British English 228: 206:Enugu Coal Camp 155:Reference No 13 143:. There are no 129: 102: 60: 37: 31: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 428: 426: 418: 417: 407:Tea with toast 385: 382: 381: 380: 361:Tea with toast 346: 334: 333: 314: 313: 312: 311: 305: 304: 300: 299: 298: 297: 291: 290: 285: 284: 283: 282: 279: 276: 270: 269: 254:Tea with toast 227: 226:Second opinion 224: 223: 222: 200:(I've removed 159:Modern history 137:Modern history 128: 125: 114:Tea with toast 101: 98: 87:Tea with toast 80: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 427: 416: 412: 408: 403: 402: 401: 400: 396: 392: 383: 379: 376: 372: 371: 366: 362: 358: 357: 356: 355: 351: 345: 343: 342: 332: 328: 325: 324: 316: 315: 309: 308: 307: 306: 302: 301: 295: 294: 293: 292: 287: 286: 280: 277: 274: 273: 272: 271: 266: 265: 264: 263: 259: 255: 250: 246: 242: 237: 236: 232: 225: 221: 218: 214: 213: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 184: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 169: 164: 160: 156: 152: 149: 146: 142: 138: 134: 126: 124: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 104:Hello! Using 99: 97: 96: 92: 88: 85: 81: 78: 77: 73: 68: 64: 59: 58: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 35: 26: 19: 387: 368: 340: 339: 335: 319: 244: 238: 234: 233: 229: 210: 205: 201: 197: 193: 188:is noted in 185: 140: 132: 130: 103: 83: 82: 75: 71: 57:Article talk 56: 52: 33: 30: 391:Jezhotwells 190:this source 133:Énúgwú Ngwọ 44:visual edit 384:Conclusion 186:Enugu Ngwo 148:verifiable 106:checklinks 18:Talk:Enugu 341:Wizardman 245:"In 1938" 84:Reviewer: 27:GA Review 322:SilkTork 194:enu egwu 145:reliable 151:sources 110:edition 67:history 48:history 34:Article 370:Ukabia 239:By my 212:Ukabia 198:Énúgwú 172:Amsaim 163:source 76:Watch 16:< 411:talk 395:talk 375:talk 365:talk 258:talk 217:talk 202:Ngwọ 176:talk 118:talk 91:talk 63:edit 40:edit 303:and 289:so: 268:So: 413:) 405:-- 397:) 373:- 260:) 252:-- 215:- 178:) 170:. 120:) 93:) 65:| 46:| 42:| 409:( 393:( 363:( 326:* 256:( 174:( 116:( 89:( 72:· 69:) 61:( 53:· 50:) 38:(

Index

Talk:Enugu
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Tea with toast
talk
01:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
checklinks
edition
Tea with toast
talk
03:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Modern history
reliable
verifiable
sources
Reference No 13
Modern history
source
original research
Amsaim
talk
12:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
this source
Ukabia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.