Knowledge

Talk:English Standard Version/GA1

Source đź“ť

354:, just letting you know that I have now finished my work on a major restructuring of the entire article (whew!). The lead section is now concise and the "Criticism" section has been merged with the "History" section. The article also features a little bit of new content, along with new citations. I guess it's just difficult to avoid talking about the gender-neutral language debate too much, as the ESV has been somewhat central to it. I have also done my own comb through Google Scholar, and I couldn't find any other applicable and/or tidy scholarly sources. The article should be ready for review again. I think that the status of this page is still currently "In review", according to the GA page? Please let me know if you have any further feedback or comments, or if there is anything I can help with. 257: 246: 235: 218: 1096: 877: 859: 810: 754: 712: 698: 646: 628: 614: 600: 551: 517: 1038: 1021: 1010: 998: 987: 42: 452: 176:: before Aussie Article Writer was blocked, they posted the following two sections. Although the next section claims that the article was failed, it was not, in fact, failed, and the review was set to continue when the block occurred. A new reviewer will be needed to do the detailed review that Aussie Article Writer did not get around to conducting. 267:
I also think that much of “criticism” should be placed into the history section. I find “criticism” sections problematic, because really most of this is around the philosophical approach to the translation by the translators. There also seems to be an overly unbalanced take on gendered language (this
983:
I feel that UBS in the infobox shouldn't need an Efn (I personally think that doing so would be odd, as that should be the purpose of the wikilink), so I haven't made any changes here. The UBS article explains that Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft is a member of UBS. It's a little tricky this one, but I
900:. I need to look at the policy on taking photos of books and using them in articles. I have run into an issue with this before as a GA Reviewer; If I recall aright, the photographer has to declare the purpose of the photograph, and then release it with a CC-by-SA creative commons licence. 907: 1006:
The Translation Oversight Committee section is relevant to briefly detail the major contributors that worked on the project. There was a small disagreement a while back surrounding how this should be rendered. I'm satisfied with how this section stands.
336:
I’m sure it can be fixed eventually, I’m asking a friend help me review this article. The ESV went through enormous review, and the gender-neutral language issue seems to take up a disproportionate amount of the article. -
1075:
It was the list of changes given out by Crossway; it is a signal inclusion - and gives evidence - to understanding transitivity and reading of the bible. There will never be a static reception of The Bible.
942:
This article is well scribed, and as discretion is the better part of valour, leaving the bulk of debate on gender-neutral language to the earlier confabulation by the Greek translators is a good decision.
408:
I've changed the status of this nomination to "second opinion" in the hopes that a new reviewer can be found that way, since Aussie Article Writer has been blocked and cannot continue this review. Thanks.
1029:
Quoting Grudem saying "'the best of the best' of the KJV tradition" belongs to an immediately prior citation (minus an Efn). I think that adding it again would be an unnecessary duplicate?
47: 769:
Strauss certainly hit the translation crew with a trout. Mounce's reply is excellent and is a very good/totally relevant citation inclusion (as it explains translation philosophies).
1018:
I would personally prefer to keep the sub-heading "Post-publication", as this ties nicely with the "Pre-publication" sub-heading. I feel that "Reception" wouldn't work as well.
126: 495: 539: 80: 122: 52: 107: 70: 156: 851: 322:, thank you so much for helping review this article. I really appreciate it. I have been its primary editor over the past year. It's open to critique! 99: 543: 535: 661:
Infobox is has a number of useful elements. Inclusion of reading level is a plus. I am nonplussed with the link to UBS. May we have an explanation?
264:
My biggest criticism is in the structure. The lead section doesn’t summarise, it seems to cram a lot of what should be in the body into the lead.
606: 527: 282: 1031:
My sense is that this is a quote, and you need to cite. Just put the previous citation in straight after it, duplication and all, yea.
869: 485: 278: 196: 865: 592: 531: 979:, thanks very much for your help! I have now resolved the main points that you brought up. I'll jump through them all quickly: 740: 491: 387: 342: 309: 290: 200: 150: 75: 825:
Interesting list of editors there, a couple of clerks in there as well!!! VistaSunset, you have certainly done the hard yards.
620: 304:
I will look at this shortly, but I’m afraid this article has some major issues. I’m not sure a GA review will fix them. -
115: 17: 1111: 383: 351: 338: 319: 305: 286: 146: 523: 92: 368:
Speaking of new citations, these include a couple of quality comments from Tim Challies surrounding the ESV.
582: 828:
326 editors, 99 page watchers, top editor is VistaSunset with 281 edits. Average of 312 page views per day.
773:
Mounce describes various points regarding his view of the need for both formal and functional translations.
704: 690: 1119: 1070: 1052: 433: 414: 373: 359: 327: 181: 271:
I am also curious if there are not more articles in religious and theological journals about the ESV.
1065:
specifically? I can't see the one (via numbering) I think you're referring to in either Read or Edit.
274:
I have therefore not done my more detailed GA review as we need to deal with structural issues first.
638: 634: 1083: 956: 465: 1035:
I have now added an appropriate Non-free image to the infobox, including an accompanying caption.
256: 245: 234: 217: 995:
I have tweaked the wording surrounding Grudem near ref 15 to be less abrupt. It's better now!
669:
there is the mention of Grudem. This is a bit abrupt as a reader does not know who Grudem is?
1115: 1066: 1048: 841: 429: 425: 410: 369: 355: 323: 177: 1123: 1087: 1056: 960: 664:
Lede is strong and robust and captures the essence of Crossways in producing this version.
469: 437: 418: 391: 377: 363: 346: 331: 313: 294: 185: 160: 1079: 976: 952: 461: 1062: 913:{{Non-free book cover|image has rationale=yes|category=Religious book cover images}} 382:
Oh wow, that's looking a heck of a lot better! I will have another look, soonish. -
1107: 1095: 1074: 1030: 1047:
Please let me know if you have any further comments. Thanks again for your help!
727:
Does there need to be a section on Translation Oversight Committee ?? Consider
199:. This is how the article, as of August 1, 2021, compares against the 951:
When we resolve these minor issues, this will be a Good Article. --
281:. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it 945:
I have raised some issues above, open to discussion there.
778:
Post-publication → would 'Reception' be a better heading?
134: 103: 277:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
1061:...also! Just out of curiosity, what reference was 1106:Post-GA, I have tidied the citations to adhere to 845:and other media, where possible and appropriate. 903:OK, I found what I was looking for. See below. 781:'the best of the best' of the KJV tradition." 906:Would it not be better to grab an image from 892:The photo is described as a geometric shape, 850:(images are tagged and non-free content have 8: 910:and use the standard non-free declaration? 210:There are structural issues in the article 30: 948:We need to resolve the book photo issue. 784:Inclusion of Reference 30 is excellent. 227:I am not convinced it covers everything 61: 33: 7: 285:. Thank you for your work so far. - 169:Initial review (not actually failed) 24: 1094: 1036: 1019: 1008: 996: 985: 984:feel that this is fine to leave. 875: 857: 808: 752: 749:Fair representation without bias 710: 696: 644: 626: 612: 598: 549: 515: 450: 255: 244: 233: 216: 191:Failed "good article" nomination 494:for what the criteria are, and 1073:) 04:51, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 512:(prose, spelling, and grammar) 1: 448:Hope to get to this shortly. 18:Talk:English Standard Version 876: 858: 809: 753: 711: 697: 645: 627: 613: 599: 550: 516: 195:This article has failed its 1124:10:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 1088:08:20, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 1057:04:43, 19 August 2021 (UTC) 961:07:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC) 470:11:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC) 438:06:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 419:01:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 186:01:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC) 1139: 392:04:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 378:04:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 364:04:52, 4 August 2021 (UTC) 231:4. Neutral point of view?: 347:06:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 332:05:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 314:05:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 295:00:13, 31 July 2021 (UTC) 201:six good article criteria 161:05:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC) 667:Right after <ref: --> 916:And list the image in ] 505:reasonably well written 197:Good article nomination 898:It's a photo of a book 498:for what they are not) 225:3. Broad in coverage?: 839:It is illustrated by 775:is a concise summary. 741:neutral point of view 682:broad in its coverage 444:Starts GA 2nd Opinion 384:Aussie Article Writer 352:Aussie Article Writer 339:Aussie Article Writer 320:Aussie Article Writer 306:Aussie Article Writer 287:Aussie Article Writer 147:Aussie Article Writer 428:, much appreciated. 852:fair use rationales 404:New reviewer needed 805:No edit wars, etc. 578:factually accurate 1112:citation overkill 870:suitable captions 593:reference section 208:1. Well written?: 89: 88: 1130: 1098: 1077: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1032: 1026: 1023: 1022: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1003: 1000: 999: 992: 989: 988: 894:this is not true 879: 878: 861: 860: 812: 811: 756: 755: 714: 713: 700: 699: 648: 647: 630: 629: 616: 615: 607:reliable sources 602: 601: 553: 552: 519: 518: 458: 454: 453: 268:is my opinion). 259: 248: 237: 220: 139: 130: 111: 43:Copyvio detector 31: 1138: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1041: 1037: 1024: 1020: 1013: 1009: 1001: 997: 990: 986: 866:appropriate use 738:It follows the 668:15</ref: --> 481: 451: 449: 446: 406: 302: 214:2. Verifiable?: 193: 171: 120: 97: 91: 85: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1136: 1134: 1045: 1044: 1033: 1027: 1016: 1004: 993: 974: 972: 970: 969: 968: 967: 966: 965: 964: 963: 949: 946: 943: 933: 932: 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 920: 919: 918: 917: 914: 911: 904: 901: 883: 882: 881: 880: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 826: 816: 815: 814: 813: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 785: 782: 779: 776: 770: 760: 759: 758: 757: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 718: 717: 716: 715: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 672: 671: 670: 665: 662: 652: 651: 650: 649: 605:(citations to 573: 572: 571: 570: 569: 568: 567: 566: 557: 556: 555: 554: 500: 499: 480: 477: 476: 445: 442: 441: 440: 405: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 366: 301: 298: 262: 261: 250: 239: 228: 222: 211: 192: 189: 170: 167: 165: 140: 87: 86: 84: 83: 78: 73: 67: 64: 63: 59: 58: 56: 55: 53:External links 50: 45: 39: 36: 35: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1135: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1104: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1092: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1034: 1028: 1017: 1005: 994: 982: 981: 980: 978: 973: 962: 958: 954: 950: 947: 944: 941: 940: 939: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 930: 927: 926: 915: 912: 909: 905: 902: 899: 895: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 873: 871: 867: 855: 853: 847: 846: 844: 843: 838: 837: 827: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 806: 803: 802: 800: 796: 795: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 761: 750: 747: 746: 744: 742: 737: 736: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 721: 720: 719: 708: 706: 694: 692: 691:major aspects 686: 685: 683: 679: 678: 666: 663: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 642: 640: 636: 624: 622: 610: 608: 596: 594: 588: 587: 585: 584: 579: 575: 574: 565: 564: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 558: 547: 545: 541: 537: 533: 529: 525: 513: 509: 508: 506: 502: 501: 497: 493: 489: 487: 483: 482: 478: 475: 473: 472: 471: 467: 463: 457: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 422: 421: 420: 416: 412: 403: 393: 389: 385: 381: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 365: 361: 357: 353: 350: 349: 348: 344: 340: 335: 334: 333: 329: 325: 321: 318: 317: 316: 315: 311: 307: 299: 297: 296: 292: 288: 284: 280: 275: 272: 269: 265: 258: 254: 251: 247: 243: 240: 236: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 215: 212: 209: 206: 205: 204: 202: 198: 190: 188: 187: 183: 179: 175: 168: 166: 163: 162: 158: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 133: 128: 124: 119: 118: 114: 109: 105: 101: 96: 95: 82: 79: 77: 74: 72: 69: 68: 66: 65: 60: 54: 51: 49: 46: 44: 41: 40: 38: 37: 32: 26: 19: 1108:MOS:REFPUNCT 1105: 1103: 1099: 1093: 1091: 1063:reference 30 1060: 1046: 975: 971: 928: 897: 893: 863: 849: 840: 804: 798: 772: 748: 739: 702: 688: 681: 632: 618: 604: 590: 581: 577: 521: 511: 504: 484: 479:Observations 474: 459: 455: 447: 407: 303: 276: 273: 270: 266: 263: 252: 241: 230: 224: 213: 207: 194: 173: 172: 164: 153: 143: 142: 135: 131: 117:Article talk 116: 112: 93: 90: 81:Instructions 1116:VistaSunset 1067:VistaSunset 1049:VistaSunset 536:word choice 430:VistaSunset 426:BlueMoonset 411:BlueMoonset 370:VistaSunset 356:VistaSunset 324:VistaSunset 279:renominated 253:6. Images?: 242:5. Stable?: 178:BlueMoonset 104:visual edit 1110:and avoid 639:plagiarism 583:verifiable 300:Discussion 283:reassessed 48:Authorship 34:GA toolbox 1080:Whiteguru 977:Whiteguru 953:Whiteguru 462:Whiteguru 456:Thank you 144:Reviewer: 71:Templates 62:Reviewing 27:GA Review 908:Crossway 157:contribs 76:Criteria 929:Overall 705:focused 635:copyvio 540:fiction 424:Cheers 127:history 108:history 94:Article 1100:Passed 842:images 799:stable 797:It is 743:policy 680:It is 576:It is 542:, and 532:layout 503:It is 488:review 868:with 544:lists 490:(see 136:Watch 16:< 1120:talk 1084:talk 1071:talk 1053:talk 957:talk 637:and 580:and 528:lead 526:for 496:here 492:here 466:talk 434:talk 415:talk 388:talk 374:talk 360:talk 343:talk 328:talk 310:talk 291:talk 260:Pass 249:Pass 238:Pass 221:Pass 182:talk 174:Note 151:talk 123:edit 100:edit 524:MoS 1122:) 1114:. 1086:) 1078:-- 1055:) 959:) 874:: 862:b 856:: 848:a 807:: 801:. 751:: 745:. 709:: 701:b 695:: 687:a 684:. 643:: 631:d 625:: 621:OR 617:c 611:: 603:b 597:: 589:a 586:. 548:: 538:, 534:, 530:, 520:b 514:: 510:a 507:. 486:GA 468:) 460:-- 436:) 417:) 390:) 376:) 362:) 345:) 330:) 312:) 293:) 203:: 184:) 159:) 125:| 106:| 102:| 1118:( 1082:( 1069:( 1051:( 1042:Y 1025:Y 1014:Y 1002:Y 991:Y 955:( 931:: 896:. 872:) 864:( 854:) 707:) 703:( 693:) 689:( 641:) 633:( 623:) 619:( 609:) 595:) 591:( 546:) 522:( 464:( 432:( 413:( 386:( 372:( 358:( 341:( 326:( 308:( 289:( 180:( 154:· 149:( 132:· 129:) 121:( 113:· 110:) 98:(

Index

Talk:English Standard Version
Copyvio detector
Authorship
External links
Templates
Criteria
Instructions
Article
edit
visual edit
history
Article talk
edit
history
Watch
Aussie Article Writer
talk
contribs
05:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
BlueMoonset
talk
01:41, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Good article nomination
six good article criteria
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
renominated
reassessed

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑