458:
Translation
Oversight Committee reviewed the text of the Apocrypha and made some changes (such as re-translating the book of Tobit from the longer and not shorter Greek text that was done in 2009 for Oxford's edition) and since then, it's now noted in these editions that the Apocrypha text is copyright 2017 by Crossway. So, while I don't think that Crossway itself will publish any editions of the ESV Apocrypha any time soon, it does hold the copyright now on the ESV Apocrypha text that is currently being published by others. In my mind, this makes the Apocrypha an official part of the ESV text, even though Crossway itself didn't originate the project and doesn't really actively publish or promote it.
480:, thanks for your edits and this postâI really appreciate it! Gotcha, I see your perspective now. Thanks for sharing your thoughts constructively. I guess I'll have to get myself an Anglican edition one day (which could be tough, because I believe it's technically available only in the US and CA). I have made a few small tweaks and format improvements to your edits (which you can obviously review in the History sectionâopen to feedback). I have moved the Anglican edition to "section 3" in the infobox "Textual basis" section as the Apocrypha is found in the back, which I think makes the most sense in this case for the sake of consistency in structure.
632:
means: it's apparently a term used to refer to particular sections of proof texts regarding certain issues surrounding social morality (e.g., with regard to homosexual behaviour, 1 Cor. 6:9â11; 1 Tim. 1:8â11). According to Clark, "theyâre trying to employ the proslavery white-supremacist hermeneutic of their human-trafficking forefathers while somehow avoiding the perception that they, too, are defending slavery and white supremacy". This is quite simply empty rhetoric that groups the translators of the ESV with individuals in the past that committed eisegesis in an attempt to justify their participation in the slave trade.
454:
University Press (and not by
Crossway) and published in 2009 (an edition that's now out of print by the way), the Apocrypha has continued to be published and included with some ESV Bibles. These editions of Bible editions with the Apocrypha include, "The Apocrypha: The Lutheran Edition with Notes (a stand-alone edition of the Apocrypha published by Concordia Publishing House), the ESV Catholic Edition (published in the United States by the Augustine Institute and including the Deuterocanonical books recognized by the Roman Catholic church), and the ESV Anglican Edition (published by Anglican House Publishers).
324:
21:
138:
233:
212:
76:
243:
536:
128:
107:
509:). Also, even though the ESV Anglican Edition has the Apocrypha after the OT and NT, the new Cambridge ESV Diadem Reference Bible with the Apocrypha places the Apocrypha in between the Old and New Testaments. Cambridge University Press also published earlier this year a stand-alone edition of the ESV Apocrypha.
392:
I am wondering if we need to look at how other articles on Bible translations handle structure. The NRSV has a âprinciples of translationâ section, which I think would be good for us to have. We could then shift the gender language criticisms into this, and make it part of a wider explanation. Thatâs
426:
Agreedâthat's probably a good starting point re "Textual characteristics". I think that having a section called "Principles of revision" generally makes less sense in comparison. Thankfully the ESV preface will make it relatively easy to discuss (and cite!) relevant topics in a somewhat structured
631:
In skimming through, is it really reasonable to assert, with regard to the slave trade, that "Grudem and the ESV translators are trying to keep that literalist, clobber-texting approach without it leading them to the conclusions it was designed to conclude"? I had to search up what "clobber text"
453:
that "I feel these changes infer that the Oxford ed
Apocrypha can be found in the official Crossway text. The infobox details information surrounding the primary feature of the article." While it's true that the original text of the Apocrypha included with the ESV Bible was commissioned by Oxford
457:
Also, more recently, Cambridge
University Press has published an ESV Text Edition of the Apocrypha (another stand-alone edition) and a new ESV Diadem Reference Edition with the Apocrypha. In the prefaces to these more recent editions (such as the ESV Anglican Edition), it's stated that the ESV
627:
Yes, this is interesting. Clark's About page is quite amusing. I personally have trouble with content throughout
Patheos as I find the quality of contributions to vary wildly. I have some brief thoughts (which aren't directed at
427:
manner, while at the same time trying not to rely on it too much. I can attempt a minor general restructure (along with taking into account the other suggestions you made) next week based on this starting point.
501:, thanks for tidying up my edits. I moved the Apocrypha section in the Infobox to in between the OT and NT, to make it consistent with other Knowledge articles on Bible translations (such as the articles on the
548:
639:
of the ESV translators engaging in debate regarding use of the word "slave", but it's an unofficial archive of a copyrighted BBC report where no official source exists.
32:
668:
587:
An interesting read diving deeper into Samuel Perry's critiques, though it'd probably need a more formal source than a direct citation of Fred Clark's writings:
693:
299:
289:
337:
591:
698:
688:
344:
340:
265:
678:
606:
194:
184:
683:
46:
544:
528:
256:
217:
449:
Some recent edits were reverted that dealt with the
Apocrypha associated with the English Standard Version with the reason given by
53:
673:
663:
160:
417:
398:
38:
601:
596:
540:
506:
87:
374:
151:
112:
413:
394:
353:
502:
20:
644:
485:
432:
93:
551:
until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
613:
514:
466:
248:
264:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
159:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
617:
359:
42:
640:
561:
498:
481:
450:
428:
409:
355:
323:
510:
477:
462:
657:
412:
has a â Textual characteristicsâ section. Wonder if we can do something with this? -
648:
621:
566:
518:
489:
470:
436:
421:
402:
357:
261:
143:
576:
in Egyptâ", or the use of "bondservant" vs. "slave"": -->
552:
636:
549:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#English
Standard VersionÂŽ
238:
232:
211:
133:
242:
592:âFor you were (redacted) in Egyptâ: Concordance-ism and the ESV (part 1)
535:
572:"âFor you were in Egyptâ", or the use of "bondservant" vs. "slave"
156:
539:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
360:
317:
127:
106:
69:
15:
607:âFor you were (redacted) in Egyptâ (part 4, a slight tangent)
155:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
59:
260:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
45:. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
368:This page has archives. Sections older than
8:
602:âFor you were (redacted) in Egyptâ (part 3)
597:âFor you were (redacted) in Egyptâ (part 2)
635:I would have detailed in the main article
206:
101:
208:
103:
527:"English Standard VersionÂŽ" listed at
378:when more than 4 sections are present.
669:Philosophy and religion good articles
33:Philosophy and religion good articles
7:
694:Low-importance Christianity articles
254:This article is within the scope of
149:This article is within the scope of
75:
73:
92:It is of interest to the following
274:Knowledge:WikiProject Christianity
14:
699:WikiProject Christianity articles
372:may be automatically archived by
277:Template:WikiProject Christianity
41:. If you can improve it further,
547:. This discussion will occur at
534:
322:
241:
231:
210:
136:
126:
105:
74:
19:
294:This article has been rated as
189:This article has been rated as
689:GA-Class Christianity articles
29:has been listed as one of the
1:
679:Mid-importance Bible articles
519:16:16, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
490:06:36, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
471:11:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
268:and see a list of open tasks.
163:and see a list of open tasks.
507:New Revised Standard Version
169:Knowledge:WikiProject Bible
715:
684:WikiProject Bible articles
567:04:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
461:Feel free to disagree. --
300:project's importance scale
195:project's importance scale
172:Template:WikiProject Bible
541:English Standard VersionÂŽ
437:11:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
422:01:16, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
403:01:12, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
293:
226:
188:
121:
100:
529:Redirects for discussion
503:Revised Standard Version
257:WikiProject Christianity
27:English Standard Version
674:GA-Class Bible articles
664:Knowledge good articles
649:02:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
622:08:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
543:and has thus listed it
393:my initial thought. -
375:Lowercase sigmabot III
82:This article is rated
414:Aussie Article Writer
395:Aussie Article Writer
280:Christianity articles
39:good article criteria
57:: August 19, 2021. (
249:Christianity portal
88:content assessment
382:
381:
314:
313:
310:
309:
306:
305:
205:
204:
201:
200:
152:WikiProject Bible
68:
67:
64:
706:
584:
583:
579:
559:
538:
410:The Living Bible
388:Structural issue
377:
361:
326:
318:
282:
281:
278:
275:
272:
251:
246:
245:
235:
228:
227:
222:
214:
207:
177:
176:
173:
170:
167:
146:
141:
140:
139:
130:
123:
122:
117:
109:
102:
85:
79:
78:
77:
70:
62:
60:Reviewed version
51:
23:
16:
714:
713:
709:
708:
707:
705:
704:
703:
654:
653:
585:
581:
577:
575:
574:
553:
532:
447:
390:
373:
362:
356:
331:
279:
276:
273:
270:
269:
247:
240:
220:
174:
171:
168:
165:
164:
142:
137:
135:
115:
86:on Knowledge's
83:
58:
12:
11:
5:
712:
710:
702:
701:
696:
691:
686:
681:
676:
671:
666:
656:
655:
652:
651:
633:
629:
610:
609:
604:
599:
594:
573:
570:
545:for discussion
531:
525:
524:
523:
522:
521:
493:
492:
446:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
389:
386:
384:
380:
379:
367:
364:
363:
358:
354:
352:
349:
348:
333:
332:
327:
321:
312:
311:
308:
307:
304:
303:
296:Low-importance
292:
286:
285:
283:
266:the discussion
253:
252:
236:
224:
223:
221:Lowâimportance
215:
203:
202:
199:
198:
191:Mid-importance
187:
181:
180:
178:
175:Bible articles
161:the discussion
148:
147:
131:
119:
118:
116:Midâimportance
110:
98:
97:
91:
80:
66:
65:
50:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
711:
700:
697:
695:
692:
690:
687:
685:
682:
680:
677:
675:
672:
670:
667:
665:
662:
661:
659:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
608:
605:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
589:
588:
580:
571:
569:
568:
565:
564:
560:
558:
557:
550:
546:
542:
537:
530:
526:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
497:
496:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
459:
455:
452:
445:ESV Apocrypha
444:
438:
434:
430:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
406:
405:
404:
400:
396:
387:
385:
376:
371:
366:
365:
351:
350:
347:
346:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
325:
320:
319:
316:
301:
297:
291:
288:
287:
284:
267:
263:
259:
258:
250:
244:
239:
237:
234:
230:
229:
225:
219:
216:
213:
209:
196:
192:
186:
183:
182:
179:
162:
158:
154:
153:
145:
134:
132:
129:
125:
124:
120:
114:
111:
108:
104:
99:
95:
89:
81:
72:
71:
61:
56:
55:
48:
44:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
22:
18:
17:
611:
586:
562:
555:
554:
533:
460:
456:
448:
391:
383:
369:
336:
328:
315:
295:
271:Christianity
262:Christianity
255:
218:Christianity
190:
150:
144:Bible portal
94:WikiProjects
52:
43:please do so
31:
30:
26:
641:VistaSunset
499:VistaSunset
482:VistaSunset
451:VistaSunset
429:VistaSunset
658:Categories
637:this video
37:under the
511:Wikiman86
478:Wikiman86
463:Wikiman86
614:Dvaderv2
505:and the
329:Archives
84:GA-class
47:reassess
370:90 days
298:on the
193:on the
556:BD2412
408:I see
90:scale.
54:Review
628:you):
338:Index
166:Bible
157:Bible
113:Bible
645:talk
618:talk
578:edit
515:talk
486:talk
476:Hey
467:talk
433:talk
418:talk
399:talk
290:Low
185:Mid
49:it.
660::
647:)
620:)
612:--
517:)
488:)
469:)
435:)
420:)
401:)
343:,
63:).
643:(
616:(
582:]
563:T
513:(
484:(
465:(
431:(
416:(
397:(
345:2
341:1
302:.
197:.
96::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
