280:(key verb) to cover something. I'd be interested in seeing the moderate-to-liberal blogs who "joined in" on Eason as well, though. I rather enjoy keeping tabs on the FoxNews-CNN-CBS media war, but didn't keep track of the blogs who covered Mr. Jordan here. Again, the wording makes this article read like, as Glenn Reynolds said in the WaPo link, a "right-wing of the blogosphere scalping." I did not insert the the tag as an "NPOV alert," I inserted it because I read POV language, and assumed that was the proper protocol.
113:
95:
64:
214:. Rumors that Eason is 'involved' with Ms Pearl may have helped persuade the CNN honchos to escort him out the door. Might such an involvement have impacted his coverage -- i.e. led him to see journalist-martyr-murdervictims in the Daniel Pearl mode where, on cool reflection, he has had to acknowledge that there isn't evidence of anything more than wartime accidents? --
123:
317:
I noticed this article ends at 2005. In 2010, Wikileaks published the Iraq War Logs, which confirm US military actions against journalists in Iraq in intelligence reports between 2004 and 2009. There was significant controversy when
Johnson claimed journalists were killed by American forces in 2005.
288:
I understand what you mean about the wording. I'll have to look at that later. I wasn't referring to your comment when I said about "right-wing" -- I knew it was in the article. I just don't have time to source it properly for a correction. But the only others I can think of right now are Andrew
266:
you'll see that the
Washington Post's media critic gives credit to the bloggers for driving the story. If you doubt that the media wasn't covering it, you're welcome to contribute sources of your own. I may add one correction later: It wasn't just the "right-wing" of the blogosphere. There were
237:
What's with the new NPOV alert? I can certainly understand if some of this seems heavy-handed, but you're supposed to indicate specific objections on the talk page so that we can all follow what needs to be addressed. The NPOV notice even refers to this. The "scare quotes" comment seems to have
275:
The article says "right-wing of the blogosphere"; I used its wording. Nor did I say it was not covered (despite that it was, for a week on FoxNews.com), I said I take issue with a
Knowledge article stating that the mysterious "mainstream media"
292:
I don't know when FoxNews.com (the website) got into it, but the cable network was surprisingly late. From my quick scanning right now (from
Reynolds), it looked like it began slowly spilling out of the blogosphere after
325:
43:
348:
48:
31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
358:
353:
141:
23:
145:
289:
Sullivan, Mickey Kaus and Jeff Jarvis who I'd really call moderates. I thought there were outright liberals too, and I'll keep looking.
149:
329:
140:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
187:
Does the use of quotation marks imply that somebody is being quoted? Otherwise, what's up with the scare marks around the phrase
136:
100:
222:
75:
246:"Mainstream media's refusal to run the story," and the like. This article reads like a collection of quotes taken
63:
32:
281:
255:
81:
263:
321:
42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
250:
the right-wing blogosphere, as opposed to an article covering it. When did "the mainstream media"
203:
46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
215:
192:
298:
262:
Actually, for all its heavy-handedness, this article was well documented. If you check the
128:
191:
here? Either use a phrase that stands without quotes, or say who the source is, please. --
39:
306:
268:
239:
226:
294:
342:
199:
112:
94:
318:
Is it worth adding a hyperlink between these pages given their relationship?
118:
333:
305:
on the 4th. I don't think FoxNews got into it yet by that time either. --
211:
302:
148:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
198:
Another interesting angle has to do with
Marianne Pearl, widow of
207:
57:
38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15:
225:
because it included information not found elsewhere.
254:to cover something, and who is their spokesperson?
267:moderates and liberals who joined in as well. --
8:
61:
319:
89:
221:Although it was old, I added the link to
91:
7:
326:2601:41:200:52C0:A5C8:5AE7:E4CD:8CEA
313:Iraq War Logs & Johnson's Claims
134:This article is within the scope of
349:Biography articles of living people
80:It is of interest to the following
14:
238:been handled a long time ago. --
301:. Kaus was still talking about
121:
111:
93:
62:
21:This article must adhere to the
158:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
359:WikiProject Biography articles
354:Start-Class biography articles
161:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
24:biographies of living persons
146:contribute to the discussion
36:must be removed immediately
375:
218:13:54, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
195:13:43, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
334:15:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
229:03:20, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
106:
88:
309:00:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
271:21:01, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
242:02:36, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
284:23:51, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
258:19:41, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
312:
70:This article is rated
206:reporter murdered in
137:WikiProject Biography
204:Wall Street Journal
164:biography articles
76:content assessment
336:
324:comment added by
223:Jordan's 1996 bio
180:
179:
176:
175:
172:
171:
56:
55:
366:
210:by jihadists in
166:
165:
162:
159:
156:
142:join the project
131:
129:Biography portal
126:
125:
124:
115:
108:
107:
97:
90:
73:
67:
66:
58:
44:this noticeboard
16:
374:
373:
369:
368:
367:
365:
364:
363:
339:
338:
315:
235:
185:
163:
160:
157:
154:
153:
127:
122:
120:
74:on Knowledge's
71:
12:
11:
5:
372:
370:
362:
361:
356:
351:
341:
340:
314:
311:
286:
285:
264:last reference
260:
259:
234:
231:
184:
181:
178:
177:
174:
173:
170:
169:
167:
133:
132:
116:
104:
103:
98:
86:
85:
79:
68:
54:
53:
49:this help page
33:poorly sourced
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
371:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
346:
344:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
310:
308:
304:
303:their silence
300:
296:
290:
283:
279:
274:
273:
272:
270:
265:
257:
253:
249:
248:straight from
245:
244:
243:
241:
232:
230:
228:
224:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
196:
194:
190:
182:
168:
151:
150:documentation
147:
143:
139:
138:
130:
119:
117:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
96:
92:
87:
83:
77:
69:
65:
60:
59:
51:
50:
45:
41:
37:
34:
30:
26:
25:
20:
18:
17:
320:— Preceding
316:
295:February 4th
291:
287:
277:
261:
251:
247:
236:
220:
216:Christofurio
200:Daniel Pearl
197:
193:Christofurio
188:
186:
135:
82:WikiProjects
47:
35:
28:
22:
72:Start-class
343:Categories
189:taken down
307:Randy2063
269:Randy2063
240:Randy2063
155:Biography
101:Biography
40:libellous
322:unsigned
212:Pakistan
183:Untitled
278:refused
233:NPOV???
252:refuse
78:scale.
227:Randy
330:talk
297:and
282:Shem
256:Shem
208:2002
202:, a
144:and
299:5th
29:BLP
345::
332:)
328:(
152:.
84::
52:.
27:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
