174:
80:
53:
90:
22:
162:
252:
in this place. The presence of a dry cleaner and a corner market do not constitute significant commerce. Therefore, there's no reason for this section to exist, especially in an article that has zero hope of ever being anything but a stub. So far as its having been there for almost a year, I can show
237:
I won't make a blanket statement about the value of the commerce section, but to me, it's just another piece of information that helps the reader understand more about the area, which I believe is the purpose of this page. What's more, it happily existed for nearly the year it has been since I first
282:
The two areas are distinct (the East
Richmond neighborhood referred to in the other article is located within the city of Richmond), so the articles should not be merged. The connection between the name "Richmond View" and East Richmond Heights is illustrated by current real estate listings (simply
233:
Indeed, there is commerce, though not an abundance. There are only two schools in the community--your standard suggest that the education section should also be called into question, due to lack of abundance of educational institutions. Indeed, the entire community houses a mere few thousand
318:
between San Pablo Avenue (Exit 16B) and San Pablo Dam Road (Exit 18). So I think both articles can claim to be referred to as either
Richmond View or Mira Vista without being misleading. And no merging required, as the two articles refer to different features (a neighborhood, and a CDP).
283:
google for "Richmond View"--real estate listings located within the CDP will be revealed.) I know of no connection between the name "Richmond View" and any area located within the city of
Richmond. My understanding is that it exclusively refers to East Richmond Heights.
187:
63:
313:
that is outside the city limits of
Richmond). But guess what? They are both perched on the same hill and there is no obvious visual break to separate the two areas, which I think could include anything east of
545:
192:
269:
540:
550:
468:
464:
450:
272:, which implicity takes that name in its title. One or the other is wrong (unless that term applies to both, in which case these articles should probably be merged). +
152:
535:
142:
555:
530:
118:
294:
103:
58:
400:
357:
304:
224:
Please don't reinsert this section; all it says, essentially, is that there's no commerce in the place. That is not useful at all. +
253:
you lots of erroneous stuff in this so-called "encyclopedia" that's been there longer than that, making that a weak argument. +
213:
33:
377:
Could someone please tell me the source for the statement about using
Richmond or El Cerrito mailing addresses? Thank you.
179:
511:
467:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
242:
228:
39:
21:
502:
408:
310:
416:
382:
345:
284:
273:
254:
239:
225:
486:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
474:
353:
117:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
407:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
378:
441:
300:
268:
The claim that this place is "sometimes referred to as
Richmond View" conflicts with the article on
324:
516:
471:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
386:
361:
328:
287:
276:
257:
487:
95:
349:
494:
453:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
320:
493:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
460:
524:
315:
339:
79:
52:
459:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
169:
113:
108:
85:
417:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov
161:
234:
individuals--does this suggest that the entire page should be removed?
238:
fleshed out this page. Perhaps others in the community can weigh in.
248:
Again; what that section says, in so many words, is that there is
420:
293:
We are comparing apples and oranges. First, we have two names:
15:
426:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
160:
411:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
107:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
404:
270:
Talk:Mira Vista (Richmond View), Richmond, California
463:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
546:Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
449:This message was posted before February 2018.
8:
541:Start-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
210:Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
19:
551:San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
399:I have just modified one external link on
299:(a neighborhood within the city limits of
47:
264:Conflict over location of "Richmond View"
220:"Commerce" section doesn't belong here.
49:
127:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject California
438:to let others know (documentation at
7:
101:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
536:Low-importance California articles
14:
403:. Please take a moment to review
401:East Richmond Heights, California
188:San Francisco Bay Area task force
172:
88:
78:
51:
20:
556:WikiProject California articles
531:Start-Class California articles
147:This article has been rated as
130:Template:WikiProject California
1:
517:05:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
421:http://factfinder2.census.gov
185:This article is supported by
180:San Francisco Bay Area portal
121:and see a list of open tasks.
362:01:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
329:17:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
219:
288:08:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
572:
480:(last update: 5 June 2024)
396:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
153:project's importance scale
387:15:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
277:18:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
258:17:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
243:08:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
229:17:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
168:
146:
73:
46:
392:External links modified
340:Map of Richmond Heights
250:no siginficant commerce
214:WikiProject U.S. Cities
216:standards might help.
165:
104:WikiProject California
64:San Francisco Bay Area
28:This article is rated
306:East Richmond Heights
164:
32:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
461:regular verification
451:After February 2018
430:parameter below to
133:California articles
505:InternetArchiveBot
456:InternetArchiveBot
166:
34:content assessment
481:
365:
348:comment added by
274:ILike2BeAnonymous
255:ILike2BeAnonymous
226:ILike2BeAnonymous
207:
206:
203:
202:
199:
198:
96:California portal
563:
515:
506:
479:
478:
457:
445:
364:
342:
334:Richmond Heights
296:Richmond Heights
182:
177:
176:
175:
135:
134:
131:
128:
125:
98:
93:
92:
91:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
571:
570:
566:
565:
564:
562:
561:
560:
521:
520:
509:
504:
472:
465:have permission
455:
439:
409:this simple FaQ
394:
375:
343:
336:
285:198.144.208.133
266:
240:198.144.208.133
222:
178:
173:
171:
132:
129:
126:
123:
122:
94:
89:
87:
67:
61:
29:
12:
11:
5:
569:
567:
559:
558:
553:
548:
543:
538:
533:
523:
522:
499:
498:
491:
424:
423:
415:Added archive
393:
390:
374:
371:
369:
367:
366:
335:
332:
291:
290:
265:
262:
261:
260:
221:
218:
211:
208:
205:
204:
201:
200:
197:
196:
193:Low-importance
184:
183:
167:
157:
156:
149:Low-importance
145:
139:
138:
136:
119:the discussion
100:
99:
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
568:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
532:
529:
528:
526:
519:
518:
513:
508:
507:
496:
492:
489:
485:
484:
483:
476:
470:
466:
462:
458:
452:
447:
443:
437:
433:
429:
422:
418:
414:
413:
412:
410:
406:
402:
397:
391:
389:
388:
384:
380:
373:Mail Delivery
372:
370:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
341:
338:
337:
333:
331:
330:
326:
322:
317:
316:Interstate 80
312:
309:(an adjacent
308:
307:
302:
298:
297:
289:
286:
281:
280:
279:
278:
275:
271:
263:
259:
256:
251:
247:
246:
245:
244:
241:
235:
231:
230:
227:
217:
215:
194:
191:(assessed as
190:
189:
181:
170:
163:
159:
158:
154:
150:
144:
141:
140:
137:
120:
116:
115:
110:
106:
105:
97:
86:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
503:
500:
475:source check
454:
448:
435:
431:
427:
425:
398:
395:
376:
368:
305:
295:
292:
267:
249:
236:
232:
223:
209:
186:
148:
112:
102:
40:WikiProjects
442:Sourcecheck
379:Onthegroove
350:Hemanetwork
344:—Preceding
30:Start-class
525:Categories
512:Report bug
124:California
114:California
109:U.S. state
59:California
495:this tool
488:this tool
321:Highspeed
501:Cheers.—
358:contribs
346:unsigned
301:Richmond
428:checked
405:my edit
303:), and
151:on the
436:failed
36:scale.
432:true
383:talk
354:talk
325:talk
212:The
469:RfC
446:).
434:or
419:to
311:CDP
143:Low
111:of
527::
482:.
477:}}
473:{{
444:}}
440:{{
385:)
360:)
356:•
327:)
195:).
62::
514:)
510:(
497:.
490:.
381:(
352:(
323:(
155:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
