200:
I don't think this is being "Reviewed". Isn't the template supposed to be replaced if it is? If there are problems with the article, list them here so I can take care of them then put the article "On Hold". I think editors are typically given a week to make revisions and corrections. Thanks!
215:
Indeed, I've noticed that in some reviews; all that needs to be done is the article reviewed, it put on hold, and it should be done within a week or two, rather than arguing on one point for weeks then finally getting to the actual article. Anyway, here's the issues I found:
94:
2. The parenthetical references don't refer to items in the reference list. This prevents the reader from making meaningful use of the references, but it also makes a reader wonder if the text was lifted, parenthetical references and all, from some other work.
149:
The references issue has been significantly improved (see the revision history). Still, "can be found easily" isn't a criterion for
Knowledge, and while parentheticals are OK, they're NOT OK if they don't refer to something in the
91:
1. There are far too many parenthetical references (stuff like: (Johnson, 1967)) amid the footnotes. These should be converted to footnotes. Which brings us to the second problem.
116:
The text doesn't seem to be copied or closely paraphrased from those sources which are online; many of the sources cited parenthetically can be found easily. —
66:
223:
Deleted. This was in the article when I took it on and I never found a source for it. It's not critical to understanding the subject.
62:
297:
274:
188:
165:
127:
There is nothing in the GA criteria—or in the Manual of Style as a whole—that says articles cannot use parenthetical referencing.
47:
106:
39:
246:", a land measurement. This is retained in the article but converted to acres. Both hectares and acres are displayed.
263:
These are the only issues I found; it's a solid article. I'll put it on hold and pass ti when the issues are fixed.
102:
251:
228:
206:
247:
224:
202:
117:
239:"0.74 ha" what does the ha abbreviation mean? might need a link so those not used to that know.
55:
17:
137:
128:
287:
264:
178:
155:
177:
Clearly not; I'll review this tonight then and pass/hold/fail it based on what I see.
32:
136:
And as a matter of fact, there is only one such reference in the entire article.
303:
280:
255:
232:
210:
194:
171:
140:
131:
122:
110:
243:
154:
Is this review still going, or does someone else need to jump in here?
74:
43:
286:Looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA.
98:Either way, this is not up to the level of a GA.
220:The citation needed tag needs to be addressed.
8:
7:
88:Two problems with the references:
24:
1:
141:17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
132:17:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
123:17:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
111:21:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
304:16:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
281:04:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
256:07:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
233:07:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
211:17:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
195:17:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
172:15:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
320:
242:"ha" is the abbr. for "
103:Piledhigheranddeeper
299:Operation Big Bear
276:Operation Big Bear
190:Operation Big Bear
167:Operation Big Bear
18:Talk:Eastern mole
311:
300:
294:
277:
271:
191:
185:
168:
162:
79:
70:
51:
319:
318:
314:
313:
312:
310:
309:
308:
302:
298:
288:
279:
275:
265:
193:
189:
179:
170:
166:
156:
86:
60:
37:
31:
29:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
317:
315:
307:
306:
296:
273:
261:
260:
259:
258:
248:Susanne2009NYC
237:
236:
235:
225:Susanne2009NYC
203:Susanne2009NYC
198:
197:
187:
164:
152:
151:
146:
145:
144:
143:
125:
85:
82:
80:
28:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
316:
305:
301:
295:
293:
292:
285:
284:
283:
282:
278:
272:
270:
269:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
219:
218:
217:
213:
212:
208:
204:
196:
192:
186:
184:
183:
176:
175:
174:
173:
169:
163:
161:
160:
148:
147:
142:
139:
135:
134:
133:
130:
126:
124:
121:
120:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
104:
101:
96:
92:
89:
83:
81:
78:
77:
73:
68:
64:
59:
58:
54:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
26:
19:
290:
289:
267:
266:
262:
214:
199:
181:
180:
158:
157:
153:
118:
99:
97:
93:
90:
87:
75:
71:
57:Article talk
56:
52:
33:
30:
44:visual edit
84:References
291:Wizardman
268:Wizardman
182:Wizardman
159:Wizardman
100:Reviewer:
27:GA Review
119:innotata
244:hectare
150:biblio.
67:history
48:history
34:Article
138:Ucucha
129:Ucucha
76:Watch
16:<
252:talk
229:talk
207:talk
107:talk
63:edit
40:edit
254:)
231:)
209:)
109:)
65:|
46:|
42:|
250:(
227:(
205:(
105:(
72:·
69:)
61:(
53:·
50:)
38:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.