360:
190:
351:
289:
802:
414:
393:
424:
666:
I don't think this is being "Reviewed". Isn't the template supposed to be replaced if it is? If there are problems with the article, list them here so I can take care of them then put the article "On Hold". I think editors are typically given a week to make revisions and corrections. Thanks!
681:
Indeed, I've noticed that in some reviews; all that needs to be done is the article reviewed, it put on hold, and it should be done within a week or two, rather than arguing on one point for weeks then finally getting to the actual article. Anyway, here's the issues I found:
560:
2. The parenthetical references don't refer to items in the reference list. This prevents the reader from making meaningful use of the references, but it also makes a reader wonder if the text was lifted, parenthetical references and all, from some other work.
615:
The references issue has been significantly improved (see the revision history). Still, "can be found easily" isn't a criterion for
Knowledge, and while parentheticals are OK, they're NOT OK if they don't refer to something in the
919:
780:
In the introduction, there's a statement that moles do not eat vegetation. In the diet section (5.1) it states plant matter is commonly consumed in large quantities and found in the stomachs of moles. Which is it?
364:
153:
924:
909:
810:
813:.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,
557:
1. There are far too many parenthetical references (stuff like: (Johnson, 1967)) amid the footnotes. These should be converted to footnotes. Which brings us to the second problem.
147:
836:
text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of
582:
The text doesn't seem to be copied or closely paraphrased from those sources which are online; many of the sources cited parenthetically can be found easily. —
914:
79:
904:
310:
934:
894:
822:
482:
472:
201:
939:
85:
871:
from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.
44:
929:
216:
899:
689:
Deleted. This was in the article when I took it on and I never found a source for it. It's not critical to understanding the subject.
448:
211:
763:
740:
654:
631:
593:
There is nothing in the GA criteria—or in the Manual of Style as a whole—that says articles cannot use parenthetical referencing.
889:
207:
99:
30:
572:
519:~~The above comment was accidentally left on a page some time ago with an incorrect title, which has now been listed as mfd~~
104:
20:
168:
437:
398:
74:
135:
509:
373:
712:", a land measurement. This is retained in the article but converted to acres. Both hectares and acres are displayed.
65:
729:
These are the only issues I found; it's a solid article. I'll put it on hold and pass ti when the issues are fixed.
447:-related subjects on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
189:
868:
568:
717:
694:
672:
129:
848:
properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original
521:
505:
109:
859:
for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Knowledge takes copyright violations
350:
206:, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
537:
504:
As the species bearing the name "common", I'd say this goes toward the higher-priority end of the scale.
125:
541:
379:
303:
272:
253:
852:
833:
829:
786:
175:
818:
713:
690:
668:
288:
161:
55:
855:
from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our
583:
70:
705:"0.74 ha" what does the ha abbreviation mean? might need a link so those not used to that know.
51:
603:
594:
782:
141:
753:
730:
644:
621:
429:
643:
Clearly not; I'll review this tonight then and pass/hold/fail it based on what I see.
883:
856:
806:
844:, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and
845:
321:
24:
817:
it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see
602:
And as a matter of fact, there is only one such reference in the entire article.
801:
872:
419:
297:
544:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
841:
807:
a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement
709:
620:
Is this review still going, or does someone else need to jump in here?
443:
875:
790:
769:
746:
721:
698:
676:
660:
637:
606:
597:
588:
576:
524:
513:
423:
413:
392:
920:
Knowledge level-5 vital articles in
Biology and health sciences
344:
15:
210:. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
821:
if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or
925:
Stub-Class vital articles in
Biology and health sciences
910:
Knowledge vital articles in
Biology and health sciences
265:
246:
160:
328:
is the most widely distributed mole in North
America?
441:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
220:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
752:Looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA.
564:Either way, this is not up to the level of a GA.
296:A fact from this article appeared on Knowledge's
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
686:The citation needed tag needs to be addressed.
174:
8:
387:
348:
225:
184:
805:This article has been revised as part of
389:
819:"using copyrighted works from others"
7:
435:This article is within the scope of
378:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
554:Two problems with the references:
14:
915:Stub-Class level-5 vital articles
905:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
823:"donating copyrighted materials"
800:
422:
412:
391:
358:
349:
287:
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
935:High-importance mammal articles
895:Knowledge Did you know articles
477:This article has been rated as
202:Natural sciences good articles
1:
607:17:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
598:17:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
589:17:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
577:21:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
457:Knowledge:WikiProject Mammals
451:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
940:WikiProject Mammals articles
876:17:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
770:16:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
747:04:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
722:07:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
699:07:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
677:17:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
661:17:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
638:15:43, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
460:Template:WikiProject Mammals
863:, and persistent violators
525:00:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
317:The text of the entry was:
50:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
956:
930:Stub-Class mammal articles
857:guideline on non-free text
791:15:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
483:project's importance scale
319:Did you know ... that the
214:. Editors may also seek a
900:Stub-Class vital articles
811:the investigation subpage
796:Copyright problem removed
476:
407:
386:
335:
273:Good article reassessment
228:
224:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
840:, and, if allowed under
514:21:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
708:"ha" is the abbr. for "
890:Delisted good articles
75:avoid personal attacks
542:Talk:Eastern mole/GA1
365:level-5 vital article
338:Delisted good article
208:good article criteria
100:Neutral point of view
569:Piledhigheranddeeper
254:Good article nominee
105:No original research
832:, we cannot accept
438:WikiProject Mammals
765:Operation Big Bear
742:Operation Big Bear
656:Operation Big Bear
633:Operation Big Bear
522:Bob the Wikipedian
506:Bob the Wikipedian
374:content assessment
229:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
497:
496:
493:
492:
489:
488:
343:
342:
311:September 1, 2010
282:
281:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
947:
804:
766:
760:
743:
737:
657:
651:
634:
628:
500:Common=important
465:
464:
461:
458:
455:
432:
427:
426:
416:
409:
408:
403:
395:
388:
371:
362:
361:
354:
353:
345:
336:Current status:
291:
268:
266:November 7, 2022
249:
247:October 17, 2010
226:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
955:
954:
950:
949:
948:
946:
945:
944:
880:
879:
798:
778:
776:Plants in diet?
768:
764:
754:
745:
741:
731:
659:
655:
645:
636:
632:
622:
552:
536:This review is
532:
502:
479:High-importance
463:mammal articles
462:
459:
456:
453:
452:
428:
421:
402:High‑importance
401:
372:on Knowledge's
369:
359:
331:
330:
315:
264:
245:
198:was one of the
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
953:
951:
943:
942:
937:
932:
927:
922:
917:
912:
907:
902:
897:
892:
882:
881:
861:very seriously
797:
794:
777:
774:
773:
772:
762:
739:
727:
726:
725:
724:
714:Susanne2009NYC
703:
702:
701:
691:Susanne2009NYC
669:Susanne2009NYC
664:
663:
653:
630:
618:
617:
612:
611:
610:
609:
591:
551:
548:
547:
546:
531:
528:
501:
498:
495:
494:
491:
490:
487:
486:
475:
469:
468:
466:
449:the discussion
434:
433:
430:Mammals portal
417:
405:
404:
396:
384:
383:
377:
355:
341:
340:
333:
332:
316:
295:
294:
292:
284:
283:
280:
279:
276:
269:
261:
260:
257:
250:
242:
241:
238:
235:
231:
230:
222:
221:
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
952:
941:
938:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
923:
921:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
896:
893:
891:
888:
887:
885:
878:
877:
874:
870:
866:
862:
858:
854:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:legal reasons
826:
825:if you are.)
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
803:
795:
793:
792:
788:
784:
775:
771:
767:
761:
759:
758:
751:
750:
749:
748:
744:
738:
736:
735:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
706:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
685:
684:
683:
679:
678:
674:
670:
662:
658:
652:
650:
649:
642:
641:
640:
639:
635:
629:
627:
626:
614:
613:
608:
605:
601:
600:
599:
596:
592:
590:
587:
586:
581:
580:
579:
578:
574:
570:
567:
562:
558:
555:
549:
545:
543:
539:
534:
533:
529:
527:
526:
523:
520:
516:
515:
511:
507:
499:
484:
480:
474:
471:
470:
467:
450:
446:
445:
440:
439:
431:
425:
420:
418:
415:
411:
410:
406:
400:
397:
394:
390:
385:
381:
375:
367:
366:
356:
352:
347:
346:
339:
334:
329:
325:
324:
323:
313:
312:
307:
305:
304:Did you know?
299:
293:
290:
286:
285:
277:
275:
274:
270:
267:
263:
262:
258:
256:
255:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
236:
233:
232:
227:
223:
219:
218:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
197:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
864:
860:
849:
837:
827:
814:
799:
779:
756:
755:
733:
732:
728:
680:
665:
647:
646:
624:
623:
619:
584:
565:
563:
559:
556:
553:
535:
518:
517:
503:
478:
442:
436:
380:WikiProjects
363:
337:
327:
322:eastern mole
320:
318:
309:
301:
271:
252:
217:reassessment
215:
200:
199:
196:Eastern mole
195:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
25:Eastern mole
19:This is the
838:information
834:copyrighted
538:transcluded
212:renominated
148:free images
31:not a forum
884:Categories
853:plagiarize
846:referenced
783:Evaunit511
550:References
370:Stub-class
326:(pictured)
308:column on
757:Wizardman
734:Wizardman
648:Wizardman
625:Wizardman
566:Reviewer:
530:GA Review
368:is rated
298:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
842:fair use
585:innotata
278:Delisted
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
869:blocked
809:. (See
710:hectare
616:biblio.
481:on the
454:Mammals
399:Mammals
300:in the
237:Process
154:WP refs
142:scholar
815:unless
604:Ucucha
595:Ucucha
444:mammal
376:scale.
259:Listed
240:Result
126:Google
873:MER-C
540:from
357:This
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
865:will
828:For
787:talk
718:talk
695:talk
673:talk
573:talk
510:talk
473:High
234:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
867:be
176:TWL
886::
850:or
789:)
720:)
697:)
675:)
575:)
512:)
156:)
54:;
785:(
716:(
693:(
671:(
571:(
508:(
485:.
382::
314:.
306:"
302:"
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
