956:
867:
849:
657:
636:
738:
717:
748:
499:
988:
407:
417:
380:
310:
292:
261:
562:
552:
190:
531:
921:
1187:
says is true. How could what he says POSSIBLY be inaccurate, given the evidence he clearly cites and you can read for yourself? pdfs of all the editions of al-talib, with her name on them, spanning 5 years, are included! Please explain to us a remotely plausible theory as to how she wasn't the editor or was only "briefly" involved!
320:
1186:
This is a mere allegation. He is a highly regarded counterterrorism expert in many law-enforcement circles, even if radical
Muslims don't like him. He meticulously includes copies of all documentation of his claims on this particular topic. By clicking on the relevant links you can see everything he
1362:
Why is it that
Muslims are so keen to hide the truth on this issue? Are you really trying to deny that Lekovic was intimately involved in al Talib (as per her original claim that she never worked for the magazine)? How about her more recent admission that she "briefly" worked for the magazine, when
1313:
Note that the fact that she was untruthful when she denied ever working for Al-talib CAN BE SEEN ON VIDEO with reference to the pdf at the link I supplied. There is nothing remotely controversial about all this - is is documented and undeniable fact that she told an untruth about never having been
1309:
I have referred to a news link for which there is no particular evidence that the person who wrote the material is the person who published it. And Human Events, the other link, is a publication dating back to 1944 with dozens of contributing writers. So I don't see how the "self-published" issue
1096:
the controversy section is heavily skewed towards accepting the premises of
Emerson aimed at manufacturing and implicitly imputing fault and guilt unto Lekovic; which is why Emerson is depicted as "confront", while Lekovic is depicted as "den" and later "admitt", all the while made to apparently
1073:. Editors should also be on the lookout for biased or malicious content about living persons. If someone appears to be pushing an agenda or a biased point of view, insist on reliable third-party published sources and a clear demonstration of relevance to the person's notability.
1207:
I also note that there is a suggestion here among a number of discussants of a pro-radical stance behind this baseless desire to censor what is important criticism of
Lekovic. Most of the article is highly positive and the criticism section just provides balance.
1384:
Can you honestly read all this and SEE THE IMAGES FOR YOURSELF and then maintain that
Emerson is making the whole thing up and is thereby unreliable? Or is the point simply that unpalatable facts about fellow Muslims must never see the light of day?
1049:, and so long as the material is written in a manner that does not overwhelm the article or appear to side with the critics' material. Be careful not to give a disproportionate amount of space to critics, to avoid the effect of
1101:
in closing, some reliable sources must be found discussing this issue neutrally and thoroughly, thus also connecting the incident to her notability, as WP:BLP mandates. until then, this problematic section needs to be removed.
153:
668:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
1090:, especially considering Emerson's slant. not a third party, because he is the one making the accusations. the whole section and its premises are sourced to Emerson, which is highly inappropriate (see below).
1282:
Never use self-published books, zines, websites, webforums, blogs or tweets as sources for material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject of the biographical material (see below).
1363:
there are scanned images with her name on dozens of different editions scanning many years? Did Steve
Emerson really fabricate the whole lot and Ms Lekovic then decided to fall totally silent on the issue?
972:
1667:
1642:
699:
778:
507:
390:
240:
1093:
the criticism is not relevant to the subject's notability, for the sources establishing notability do not make these allegations (else we wouldn't have to be sourcing to
Emerson)
795:
1135:
this was dicussed on network television and this is clearly notable to her public persona and identity. once again, the pro-terrorist supporters on wikipedia gets their way.
147:
200:
1672:
1627:
689:
1515:
1511:
1497:
831:
1652:
1622:
245:
1637:
1612:
821:
608:
785:
79:
1176:
I don't understand, if you cite the newspaper itself which praises Osama Bin Laden - not
Emerson's report but the newspaper itself why is that unacceptable?
1657:
1577:
1463:
489:
443:
1647:
1632:
1607:
228:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
790:
664:
641:
338:
220:
1118:
I see, "neither (Emerson) nor his blog constitute a third-party reliable source." In other words, no one who investigates
Islamists is reliable, right?
1597:
479:
618:
44:
85:
1587:
1582:
451:
342:
1602:
1592:
1047:
The views of critics should be represented if their views are relevant to the subject's notability and are based on reliable secondary sources
761:
722:
512:
1410:
1314:
the managing editor of a pro-Jihad magazine. Not even she tries to deny anymore that she was the managing editor of a pro-Jihad magazine!
1226:
30:
1405:
Your comment does not address the fact this accusation is "guilt by association." This type of content is specifically disallowed by the
337:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1662:
1617:
883:
584:
447:
1424:
1162:
1142:
773:
346:
1006:
333:
297:
99:
998:
455:
431:
385:
104:
20:
949:
769:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
168:
945:
74:
135:
272:
874:
854:
575:
536:
65:
1464:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070930224838/http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/WellesleyWeek/Archive/2006/ww031306.html
1129:
why is the fact that lekovic praised bin laden not relevant in a post 9/11 environment when she is a muslim spokesperson?
583:-related articles on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1287:
The only blog that could possibly be used, even the with caution, is Lekovic's. I'm now proceeding to remove the section.
1063:
941:
1558:
196:
1022:
129:
1225:
How does this change the fact that the accusations is based on an association fallacy? I have removed the section.
1467:
1002:
229:
109:
1514:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
1414:
1230:
125:
1367:
278:
260:
1549:
1455:
1428:
1166:
1146:
1138:
960:
866:
848:
175:
1379:
55:
1533:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1521:
1345:
1294:
1256:
882:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1454:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1097:
contradict the "facts" cited to Emerson. the allegations themselves center around guilt by association.
656:
635:
70:
1488:
1069:
753:
239:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
189:
1391:
1315:
1211:
161:
1435:
many muslims use their work on wikipedia to promote and defend islam. i'm so tired of wiki-jihad
1395:
1319:
1215:
243:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
1518:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
1012:
737:
716:
236:
141:
1534:
51:
1050:
1366:
Please read the relevant material and SEE THE IMAGES YOURSELF: Emerson's first publication:
1340:
1289:
1251:
1193:
Lekovic is best known as a face of moderate Islam. Any evidence which suggests otherwise is
1119:
325:
24:
1541:
1406:
1271:
1039:
1016:
422:
1087:
1055:
If the criticism represents the views of a tiny minority, it has no place in the article.
1500:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
1103:
1540:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
1507:
1571:
1447:
1083:
766:
567:
1130:
498:
1159:
porn stars get entire paragraphs devoted to them making silly jokes about muslims
1158:
1025:) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection.
1468:
http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/WellesleyWeek/Archive/2006/ww031306.html
416:
309:
291:
1506:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
743:
557:
412:
315:
997:
to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
1563:
1432:
1418:
1399:
1353:
1323:
1302:
1264:
1234:
1219:
1170:
1150:
1122:
1112:
406:
379:
1368:
http://www.investigativeproject.org/293/ms-lekovica-dozen-printing-mistakes
1338:
Robert Spencer is the author of the next source. He is not relaible either.
765:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
1333:
442:-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us
1373:
438:
1380:
http://www.investigativeproject.org/292/mpac-whos-changing-the-subject
964:
551:
530:
345:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1246:
879:
580:
1249:, a blog, a reliable source on a living person? I don't think so.
1190:(2) "the criticism is not relevant to the subject's notability"
1180:
The reasoning presented for removing the section is fallacious:
1161:
but this outrageous thing gets hushed up here? What the hell? --
1082:
the meat of the controversy section is almost solely sourced to
995:
contributor has declared a personal or professional connection
982:
915:
254:
235:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
212:
184:
15:
1066:
and should be about the subject of the article specifically.
1473:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the
919:
497:
1051:
representing a minority view as if it were the majority one
1458:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
1668:
Knowledge (XXG) requested images of people of California
1451:
1388:
All critics are declared "unreliable" no matter what.
1086:. while notable, neither he nor his blog constitute a
160:
436:, a project to improve Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on
1643:
Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
948:. Please replace this template with a more specific
878:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
579:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1510:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
510:, a work group which is currently considered to be
174:
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1131:http://www.investigativeproject.org/article/271
1496:This message was posted before February 2018.
1200:(3) "controversy section is heavily skewed"
674:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women in Religion
8:
1183:(1) Emerson is said not to be "reliable."
258:
1446:I have just modified one external link on
1272:Knowledge (XXG):BLP#Self-published_sources
1241:Blog a reliable source on a living person?
843:
711:
630:
525:
374:
286:
1673:Articles edited by connected contributors
1628:Low-importance Women in Religion articles
963:may be able to locate suitable images on
806:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
662:This article is within the scope of the
1332:Freedom's zone is a blog of sorts. See
845:
713:
632:
527:
376:
288:
1653:Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
1623:Start-Class Women in Religion articles
1374:http://www.mpac.org/article.php?id=510
677:Template:WikiProject Women in Religion
1638:Low-importance United States articles
1613:Low-importance Islam-related articles
1485:to let others know (documentation at
1034:BLP problems with controversy section
355:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
872:This article is within the scope of
759:This article is within the scope of
573:This article is within the scope of
506:This article is within the scope of
464:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Religion
428:This article is within the scope of
331:This article is within the scope of
1658:All WikiProject Women-related pages
1578:Biography articles of living people
1270:I believe the relevant section is:
277:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1648:WikiProject United States articles
1633:Start-Class United States articles
1608:Start-Class Islam-related articles
1329:Both your sources are unreliable.
809:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
1450:. Please take a moment to review
1203:I have completely re-written it.
961:Openverse Creative Commons Search
892:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Women
593:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Islam
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1598:Low-importance Religion articles
986:
865:
847:
746:
736:
715:
655:
634:
560:
550:
529:
415:
405:
378:
318:
308:
290:
259:
218:This article must adhere to the
199:on 1 August 2021. The result of
188:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1378:Emerson's second publication:
826:This article has been rated as
694:This article has been rated as
613:This article has been rated as
484:This article has been rated as
195:This article was nominated for
1588:WikiProject Biography articles
1583:Start-Class biography articles
1068:Beware of claims that rely on
993:The following Knowledge (XXG)
358:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1603:WikiProject Religion articles
1593:Start-Class Religion articles
1564:07:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
1419:07:34, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
1407:biographies of living persons
1400:23:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
1354:20:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
1324:23:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
1303:19:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
1265:19:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
1235:03:59, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
1151:00:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
1123:00:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
1062:Content should be sourced to
886:and see a list of open tasks.
665:Women in Religion WikiProject
587:and see a list of open tasks.
467:Template:WikiProject Religion
221:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
343:contribute to the discussion
1220:04:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1113:13:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
1088:third-party reliable source
233:must be removed immediately
1689:
1663:WikiProject Women articles
1618:WikiProject Islam articles
1527:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1443:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
1335:, if you don't believe me.
1171:01:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
898:WikiProject Women articles
895:Template:WikiProject Women
832:project's importance scale
700:project's importance scale
680:Women in Religion articles
619:project's importance scale
596:Template:WikiProject Islam
490:project's importance scale
860:
825:
762:WikiProject United States
731:
693:
650:
612:
545:
505:
483:
400:
303:
285:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1433:09:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
1038:the relevant passage on
928:It is requested that an
767:United States of America
454:standards, or visit the
1439:External links modified
1284:
1078:some points of order:
1076:
1058:
957:Free Image Search Tool
950:media request template
924:
812:United States articles
599:Islam-related articles
502:
267:This article is rated
75:avoid personal attacks
1280:
1157:I agree. Articles on
1059:
1044:
1007:neutral point of view
923:
508:Interfaith work group
501:
334:WikiProject Biography
271:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
100:Neutral point of view
1508:regular verification
1372:Lekovic's response:
1247:counterterrorismblog
1070:guilt by association
999:conflict of interest
967:and other web sites.
754:United States portal
432:WikiProject Religion
105:No original research
1498:After February 2018
1477:parameter below to
946:improve its quality
944:in this article to
780:Articles Requested!
1552:InternetArchiveBot
1503:InternetArchiveBot
925:
503:
444:assess and improve
361:biography articles
273:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1528:
1153:
1141:comment added by
1110:
1031:
1030:
981:
980:
968:
914:
913:
910:
909:
906:
905:
875:WikiProject Women
842:
841:
838:
837:
710:
709:
706:
705:
671:Women in Religion
642:Women in Religion
629:
628:
625:
624:
576:WikiProject Islam
524:
523:
520:
519:
470:Religion articles
458:for more details.
373:
372:
369:
368:
253:
252:
211:
210:
183:
182:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1680:
1562:
1553:
1526:
1525:
1504:
1492:
1349:
1310:arises anymore.
1298:
1260:
1136:
1108:
1104:
1064:reliable sources
990:
989:
983:
977:
975:
954:
952:where possible.
922:
916:
900:
899:
896:
893:
890:
869:
862:
861:
851:
844:
814:
813:
810:
807:
804:
756:
751:
750:
749:
740:
733:
732:
727:
719:
712:
682:
681:
678:
675:
672:
659:
652:
651:
646:
638:
631:
601:
600:
597:
594:
591:
570:
565:
564:
563:
554:
547:
546:
541:
533:
526:
472:
471:
468:
465:
462:
456:wikiproject page
425:
420:
419:
409:
402:
401:
396:
393:
382:
375:
363:
362:
359:
356:
353:
339:join the project
328:
326:Biography portal
323:
322:
321:
312:
305:
304:
294:
287:
270:
264:
263:
255:
241:this noticeboard
213:
192:
185:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1688:
1687:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1679:
1678:
1677:
1568:
1567:
1556:
1551:
1519:
1512:have permission
1502:
1486:
1456:this simple FaQ
1441:
1352:
1347:
1301:
1296:
1263:
1258:
1243:
1106:
1036:
987:
973:
971:
920:
897:
894:
891:
888:
887:
811:
808:
805:
802:
801:
800:
786:Become a Member
752:
747:
745:
725:
679:
676:
673:
670:
669:
644:
598:
595:
592:
589:
588:
566:
561:
559:
539:
469:
466:
463:
460:
459:
423:Religion portal
421:
414:
394:
388:
360:
357:
354:
351:
350:
324:
319:
317:
268:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1686:
1684:
1676:
1675:
1670:
1665:
1660:
1655:
1650:
1645:
1640:
1635:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1615:
1610:
1605:
1600:
1595:
1590:
1585:
1580:
1570:
1569:
1546:
1545:
1538:
1471:
1470:
1462:Added archive
1440:
1437:
1422:
1421:
1411:69.115.152.137
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1344:
1336:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1293:
1285:
1278:
1275:
1255:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1227:69.115.152.137
1206:
1179:
1174:
1173:
1128:
1126:
1125:
1099:
1098:
1094:
1091:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
991:
979:
978:
969:
953:
926:
912:
911:
908:
907:
904:
903:
901:
884:the discussion
870:
858:
857:
852:
840:
839:
836:
835:
828:Low-importance
824:
818:
817:
815:
799:
798:
793:
788:
783:
776:
774:Template Usage
770:
758:
757:
741:
729:
728:
726:Low‑importance
720:
708:
707:
704:
703:
696:Low-importance
692:
686:
685:
683:
660:
648:
647:
645:Low‑importance
639:
627:
626:
623:
622:
615:Low-importance
611:
605:
604:
602:
585:the discussion
572:
571:
555:
543:
542:
540:Low‑importance
534:
522:
521:
518:
517:
504:
494:
493:
486:Low-importance
482:
476:
475:
473:
427:
426:
410:
398:
397:
395:Low‑importance
383:
371:
370:
367:
366:
364:
330:
329:
313:
301:
300:
295:
283:
282:
276:
265:
251:
250:
246:this help page
230:poorly sourced
216:
209:
208:
201:the discussion
193:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1685:
1674:
1671:
1669:
1666:
1664:
1661:
1659:
1656:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1646:
1644:
1641:
1639:
1636:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1614:
1611:
1609:
1606:
1604:
1601:
1599:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1589:
1586:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1573:
1566:
1565:
1560:
1555:
1554:
1543:
1539:
1536:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1523:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1499:
1494:
1490:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1460:
1459:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1448:Edina Lekovic
1444:
1438:
1436:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1376:
1375:
1370:
1369:
1364:
1355:
1351:
1350:
1343:
1342:
1337:
1334:
1331:
1330:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1311:
1304:
1300:
1299:
1292:
1291:
1286:
1283:
1279:
1276:
1273:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1262:
1261:
1254:
1253:
1248:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1204:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1191:
1188:
1184:
1181:
1177:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1133:
1132:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1085:
1084:Steve Emerson
1081:
1080:
1079:
1075:
1074:
1072:
1071:
1065:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1043:
1041:
1033:
1024:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1008:
1004:
1003:autobiography
1000:
996:
992:
985:
984:
976:
970:
966:
962:
958:
951:
947:
943:
939:
938:Edina Leković
935:
931:
927:
918:
917:
902:
885:
881:
877:
876:
871:
868:
864:
863:
859:
856:
853:
850:
846:
833:
829:
823:
820:
819:
816:
803:United States
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
781:
777:
775:
772:
771:
768:
764:
763:
755:
744:
742:
739:
735:
734:
730:
724:
723:United States
721:
718:
714:
701:
697:
691:
688:
687:
684:
667:
666:
661:
658:
654:
653:
649:
643:
640:
637:
633:
620:
616:
610:
607:
606:
603:
586:
582:
578:
577:
569:
558:
556:
553:
549:
548:
544:
538:
535:
532:
528:
515:
514:
509:
500:
496:
495:
491:
487:
481:
478:
477:
474:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
435:
434:
433:
424:
418:
413:
411:
408:
404:
403:
399:
392:
387:
384:
381:
377:
365:
348:
347:documentation
344:
340:
336:
335:
327:
316:
314:
311:
307:
306:
302:
299:
296:
293:
289:
284:
280:
274:
266:
262:
257:
256:
248:
247:
242:
238:
234:
231:
227:
223:
222:
217:
215:
214:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
186:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
25:Edina Leković
22:
18:
17:
1550:
1547:
1522:source check
1501:
1495:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1472:
1445:
1442:
1425:96.251.14.24
1423:
1390:
1387:
1383:
1377:
1371:
1365:
1361:
1346:
1339:
1312:
1308:
1295:
1288:
1281:
1257:
1250:
1244:
1210:
1205:
1202:
1199:
1194:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1175:
1163:84.137.33.37
1143:76.213.227.5
1134:
1127:
1105:
1100:
1077:
1067:
1061:
1060:
1054:
1046:
1045:
1037:
1019:
994:
937:
933:
929:
873:
827:
791:Project Talk
779:
760:
695:
663:
614:
574:
568:Islam portal
511:
485:
446:articles to
437:
430:
429:
332:
279:WikiProjects
244:
232:
225:
219:
204:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1489:Sourcecheck
1137:—Preceding
1120:Scott Adler
269:Start-class
148:free images
31:not a forum
1572:Categories
1559:Report bug
1197:relevant.
934:photograph
391:Interfaith
1542:this tool
1535:this tool
1277:It states
1107:ITAQALLAH
352:Biography
298:Biography
237:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1548:Cheers.—
1409:policy.
1392:Writer98
1316:Writer98
1212:Writer98
1139:unsigned
1023:contribs
942:included
513:inactive
461:Religion
439:Religion
386:Religion
197:deletion
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1475:checked
1452:my edit
1245:Is the
830:on the
698:on the
617:on the
488:on the
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1483:failed
1195:highly
1040:WP:BLP
1005:, and
974:Upload
965:Flickr
796:Alerts
275:scale.
126:Google
1013:Edlek
930:image
889:Women
880:women
855:Women
590:Islam
581:Islam
537:Islam
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1479:true
1429:talk
1415:talk
1396:talk
1348:talk
1320:talk
1297:talk
1259:talk
1231:talk
1216:talk
1167:talk
1147:talk
1042:is:
1017:talk
955:The
450:and
448:good
341:and
205:keep
203:was
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1516:RfC
1493:).
1481:or
1466:to
1009:.
959:or
940:be
936:of
932:or
822:Low
690:Low
609:Low
480:Low
452:1.0
226:BLP
176:TWL
1574::
1529:.
1524:}}
1520:{{
1491:}}
1487:{{
1431:)
1417:)
1398:)
1341:VR
1322:)
1290:VR
1252:VR
1233:)
1218:)
1169:)
1149:)
1053:.
1001:,
389::
156:)
54:;
1561:)
1557:(
1544:.
1537:.
1427:(
1413:(
1394:(
1318:(
1274:.
1229:(
1214:(
1165:(
1145:(
1020:·
1015:(
834:.
702:.
621:.
516:.
492:.
349:.
281::
249:.
224:(
207:.
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
