70:
21:
49:
107:
etc. I ran into this topic some years ago, when I looked into unemployment statistics, and therefore, underlying definitions. "Effective unemployement" may not be the right term, looked in my old sources and found "Expanded unemployment". Same thing.
142:
So you have these "old sources", you confirmed the definition, and you found a synonym. Then you took off the prod tag and left it as a dictionary definition without any references (and inadequate context).
31:
221:
213:
157:
Yes, I made a contribution, It may not be perfect, but I think it is in the right direction, even for the obvious shortcomings.
81:
127:
Bottom line though, is that the term is relevant, encyclopedic, notable .. the whole slew, but it evidently needs expansion.
55:
236:
27:
148:
179:
162:
132:
217:
209:
69:
95:
I'm somewhat surprised that this issue was not already discussed on Wiki. But it isn't. Have checked
144:
20:
175:
158:
128:
48:
172:
104:
183:
166:
152:
136:
230:
201:
This key info. should not be in a stray stub off to the side. It belongs right in
100:
96:
193:
204:
195:
63:
43:
15:
116:Gscholar returns 82 hits, and Gbooks 212 books
173:Talk:Unemployment#Effective_unemployment_rate
123:Gscholar returns 73 hits, and Gbooks 76 books
8:
67:
30:on 6 March 2009 (UTC). The result of
7:
205:http://en.wikipedia.org/Unemployment
196:http://en.wikipedia.org/Unemployment
14:
68:
47:
19:
194:Don't delete, but do fold into
26:This article was nominated for
1:
222:15:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
114:"Effective unemployment rate"
121:"Expanded unemployment rate"
253:
171:Please note discussion at
184:20:14, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
167:11:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
153:15:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
137:15:21, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
58:by an editor in the past.
76:This article is rated
80:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
56:proposed for deletion
237:Stub-Class articles
82:content assessment
212:comment added by
88:
87:
62:
61:
42:
41:
244:
224:
79:
73:
72:
64:
51:
44:
23:
16:
252:
251:
247:
246:
245:
243:
242:
241:
227:
226:
207:
199:
145:RenegadeMonster
105:underemployment
93:
77:
12:
11:
5:
250:
248:
240:
239:
229:
228:
198:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
186:
176:Power.corrupts
159:Power.corrupts
129:Power.corrupts
125:
124:
117:
92:
89:
86:
85:
74:
60:
59:
54:This page was
52:
40:
39:
32:the discussion
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
249:
238:
235:
234:
232:
225:
223:
219:
215:
214:66.167.61.181
211:
206:
202:
197:
185:
181:
177:
174:
170:
169:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
150:
146:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
119:For the term
118:
115:
112:For the term
111:
110:
109:
106:
102:
98:
91:PROD declined
90:
83:
75:
71:
66:
65:
57:
53:
50:
46:
45:
37:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
208:— Preceding
203:
200:
126:
120:
113:
101:unemployment
94:
35:
97:employment
78:Stub-class
231:Category
210:unsigned
28:deletion
84:scale.
218:talk
180:talk
163:talk
149:talk
133:talk
36:keep
34:was
233::
220:)
182:)
165:)
151:)
135:)
103:,
99:,
216:(
178:(
161:(
147:(
131:(
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
