363:
342:
309:
373:
480:
459:
265:
569:
548:
216:
747:
Botteville wanted to make the article appear as if it was an open-and-shut thing and 99% settled. In doing so he ran over other editors, flatly rewrote major parts of the article without discussion and drenched that section in hopelessly arcane and weaselly prose to bend things to his point of view. This stuff was corrected after a while and after quite a few bad-faith edits.
300:
893:
I've just finished a 9-year project on the
Eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in AD 79, and the Letters of Pliny the Younger about that event. The book will be published by Routledge in March 2022. The book offers a number of corrections and clarifications to the nature, sequence, and date of the eruption, and
801:
It looks fairly good as it is now. The issue of the date is important, it just shouldn't become overly technical or POV-pushing. It's also an interesting example of how methods of dating ancient events really operate in practice. I left the comment also because
Botteville sometimes revisits his old
746:
that bit and push the view that scientific consensus had settled on a date in the autumn, not 24 August, for the eruption. There is an ongoing discussion about this, because certain aspects of the findings don't seem to square very well with an August date, and it is reflected in the text here, but
958:
All the info comes from the well-known two letters by Pliny the
Younger, as mentioned in the text. There are no other contemporary sources for the eruption, and all we know about it, we know from Pliny. There is no need to add reference to every sentence. The text transmits Pliny’s information
903:
This link contains a video presented last week to the Annual
Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America. It specifically explains why the Aug. 24 date is the date that Pliny the Younger recorded in the written sources. There is also a link to the book at the publisher's website; the book
816:
I have changed the date in the infobox from "24 August 79 AD or 24 October 79 AD" to "24-25 August 79 AD (probable)". First of all, it is a known fact that the eruption occurred over a two-day span. This was not noted in the infobox before. In addition, mainstream scholarly consensus has always
728:
The eruption happening in the course of AD 79 has never been seriously questioned by any notable historians or archaologists in the modern age. I figure there are a number of different things about the references to the eruption itself in ancient written sources that pinned it down to that year
729:(Pliny isn't the only one mentioning it). The distinction between AD years and AbUC years was probably just added to remind the reader that Roman writers of the day did not use the BC/AD convention (of course!). It doesn't say that Pliny actually dated it by means of ab urbe condita.
661:. For AD 79, those consuls would have been Vespasian & Titus. I'd correct the text, but I don't know which primary source -- if any -- provides the consuls who presided in this year, let alone the primary sources that provide the information that provides the date. --
974:
I added references to a secondary source (Sigurðsson, et al., 1982). The overall "Nature of the eruption" section is still undersourced: it relies heavily on that source and (Zanella, et al., 2007). I left the "more citations needed" tag at the top of the section. —
863:
I agree with the IP editor above -- there is a new finding in the Regio V excavation of
Pompeii that indicates an October date, but that has only been reported in the popular press. I cannot find a scientific paper about that finding, only
817:
favored August 24 as the date of the eruption, and, as I said in an edit summary, that date "should be given preeminence." I am not exactly an expert on the mountain or the eruption, but I have read some material about it and watched the
910:
I have not previously engaged in any requests for edits on
Knowledge (XXG), so I apologize if I don't yet understand all the protocols; I just want to provide the public with the most recent and sound arguments and evidence. Thank you.
166:
821:
documentary, and I can say that reading this article is the first time that I can recall the mention of a date other than August 24. I also find the section "Date of the
Eruption" to be confusing and poorly sourced.
619:
1069:
609:
57:
845:
This new find could tip the scales in favour of late
October or November, but we should await the scientific discussion which will surely follow, before we make any definite change of date:
160:
1074:
1029:
585:
530:
1044:
431:
651:
dating on a regular basis, in part because there was no consensus which year Rome was founded in (the "traditional" date of 753 BC was only one of many used; when Jerome wrote his
1059:
520:
1064:
643:
The section "Date of the eruption" of the present version of this article begins, "The year of the eruption is pinned to AD 79 (that is, the corresponding year of the Roman
207:
203:
581:
576:
553:
496:
939:
Well, not more "aligned with seasons" than in today's
Gregorian calendar. I really have no clue what was meant here, but the remark in the brackets, as is, is absurd.
655:
in the 4th century AD, he stated the year of Rome's founding as 755 BC!), but mostly because the accepted practice would have been to date the year by the presiding
580:, a group of contributors interested in Knowledge (XXG)'s articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our
1039:
1019:
1054:
1004:
999:
441:
92:
1014:
487:
464:
936:"(Note that the Julian calendar was in place throughout the first century AD – that is, the months of the Roman calendar were aligned with the seasons.)"
313:
1034:
1049:
676:
The "date of the eruption" section seems to follow one source (Rolandi): I provided a non-paywall link to that paper. The paper doesn't talk about
98:
1024:
181:
407:
148:
849:
43:
898:
940:
846:
37:
276:
386:
347:
142:
112:
960:
865:
117:
33:
138:
87:
1009:
322:
78:
188:
362:
341:
742:
The real issue with that section, a few years back, was that one opinionated editor (Botteville aka Dave), tried to
215:
198:
247:
122:
827:
154:
226:
853:
328:
944:
964:
907:
There has been much debate about the date recently; this book project has been an effort to clear that up.
684:
weight to a minority viewpoint. But, I'm certainly not an archaeologist or classicist, so I don't know. —
68:
495:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
406:
on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
83:
899:
https://quemdixerechaos.com/2022/01/07/the-date-of-the-ad-79-vesuvius-eruption-in-the-textual-sources/
285:
281:
847:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/oct/16/archeological-find-changes-date-of-pompeiis-destruction
823:
807:
752:
299:
984:
968:
948:
926:
877:
857:
831:
811:
782:
756:
715:
693:
670:
492:
174:
403:
231:
918:
681:
230:
980:
873:
778:
711:
689:
666:
657:
399:
64:
888:
378:
228:
743:
703:
922:
803:
748:
647:
calendar era)" -- which contains a significant mistake. The ancient Romans never used the
251:
993:
917:
Pedar W. Foss, Professor of Classical Studies DePauw University, Greencastle, IN USA
976:
869:
774:
707:
685:
662:
698:
Later --- apparently, the "ab urbe condita" phrase was put in by an IP editor (in
395:
372:
264:
479:
458:
368:
271:
568:
547:
868:. There will clearly be a scientific debate: let's not get ahead of it. —
904:
examines all the archaeological evidence for alternate (autumn) dates.
391:
706:. It doesn't look supported by any source, so we can delete it. —
884:
773:
Should we delete the section, condense it, or leave it as is? —
293:
259:
240:
232:
28:
15:
680:
at all. I'm concerned that the whole section could be giving
889:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Eruption_of_Mount_Vesuvius_in_79_AD
584:. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our
270:
A fact from this article was featured on Knowledge (XXG)'s
699:
173:
594:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
897:
I have posted some results on my professional blog:
491:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
390:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
187:
1070:High-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
1030:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in History
802:contributions, and he can be very tenacious. ;)
46:for general discussion of the article's subject.
1075:All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
505:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Disaster management
597:Template:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
1045:Top-importance WikiProject Volcanoes articles
8:
1060:Mid-importance Disaster management articles
1065:B-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
702:) who was trying to make the section less
542:
453:
336:
1020:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in History
954:Can we remove all the “citation needed”?
508:Template:WikiProject Disaster management
885:https://en.wikipedia.org/Mount_Vesuvius
544:
455:
338:
297:
1040:B-Class WikiProject Volcanoes articles
1015:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
577:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome
416:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Volcanoes
7:
1055:B-Class Disaster management articles
1005:Selected anniversaries (August 2016)
1000:Selected anniversaries (August 2014)
932:Calendar months aligned with seasons
574:This article is within the scope of
485:This article is within the scope of
384:This article is within the scope of
883:Hello; I'm writing with regard to:
38:Eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD
36:for discussing improvements to the
600:Classical Greece and Rome articles
14:
1035:B-Class vital articles in History
63:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
567:
546:
478:
457:
371:
361:
340:
307:
298:
263:
214:
58:Click here to start a new topic.
1050:All WikiProject Volcanoes pages
614:This article has been rated as
525:This article has been rated as
488:WikiProject Disaster management
436:This article has been rated as
1025:B-Class level-5 vital articles
422:WikiProject Volcanoes articles
419:Template:WikiProject Volcanoes
327:It is of interest to multiple
1:
499:and see a list of open tasks.
410:and see a list of open tasks.
55:Put new text under old text.
927:14:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
878:07:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
858:04:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
511:Disaster management articles
949:14:27, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
832:18:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
250:of this article appears in
1091:
985:13:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
969:19:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
620:project's importance scale
531:project's importance scale
442:project's importance scale
613:
591:Classical Greece and Rome
562:
554:Classical Greece and Rome
524:
473:
435:
356:
335:
93:Be welcoming to newcomers
22:Skip to table of contents
812:05:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
783:02:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
757:23:31, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
21:
894:the evidence for each.
716:23:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
694:22:24, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
671:21:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
1010:B-Class vital articles
88:avoid personal attacks
387:WikiProject Volcanoes
321:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
314:level-5 vital article
208:Auto-archiving period
113:Neutral point of view
819:Pompeii the Last Day
639:Date of the eruption
118:No original research
502:Disaster management
493:Disaster management
465:Disaster management
866:a web site posting
323:content assessment
99:dispute resolution
60:
658:Consul Ordinarius
634:
633:
630:
629:
626:
625:
541:
540:
537:
536:
452:
451:
448:
447:
400:igneous petrology
292:
291:
258:
257:
239:
238:
79:Assume good faith
56:
27:
26:
1082:
602:
601:
598:
595:
592:
571:
564:
563:
558:
550:
543:
513:
512:
509:
506:
503:
482:
475:
474:
469:
461:
454:
424:
423:
420:
417:
414:
404:related subjects
381:
379:Volcanoes portal
376:
375:
365:
358:
357:
352:
344:
337:
320:
311:
310:
303:
302:
294:
267:
260:
241:
233:
219:
218:
209:
192:
191:
177:
108:Article policies
29:
16:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1080:
1079:
990:
989:
956:
934:
824:Display name 99
678:ab urbe condita
649:ab urbe condita
645:ab urbe condita
641:
616:High-importance
599:
596:
593:
590:
589:
557:High‑importance
556:
510:
507:
504:
501:
500:
467:
421:
418:
415:
412:
411:
377:
370:
350:
318:
308:
286:August 24, 2016
282:August 24, 2014
235:
234:
229:
206:
134:
129:
128:
127:
104:
74:
12:
11:
5:
1088:
1086:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1067:
1062:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1002:
992:
991:
988:
987:
955:
952:
933:
930:
881:
880:
850:83.254.130.142
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
721:
720:
719:
718:
640:
637:
632:
631:
628:
627:
624:
623:
612:
606:
605:
603:
572:
560:
559:
551:
539:
538:
535:
534:
527:Mid-importance
523:
517:
516:
514:
497:the discussion
483:
471:
470:
468:Mid‑importance
462:
450:
449:
446:
445:
438:Top-importance
434:
428:
427:
425:
408:the discussion
383:
382:
366:
354:
353:
351:Top‑importance
345:
333:
332:
326:
304:
290:
289:
268:
256:
255:
252:Mount Vesuvius
244:
237:
236:
227:
225:
224:
221:
220:
194:
193:
131:
130:
126:
125:
120:
115:
106:
105:
103:
102:
95:
90:
81:
75:
73:
72:
61:
52:
51:
48:
47:
41:
25:
24:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1087:
1076:
1073:
1071:
1068:
1066:
1063:
1061:
1058:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1048:
1046:
1043:
1041:
1038:
1036:
1033:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1021:
1018:
1016:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1006:
1003:
1001:
998:
997:
995:
986:
982:
978:
973:
972:
971:
970:
966:
962:
953:
951:
950:
946:
942:
941:83.28.217.137
937:
931:
929:
928:
924:
920:
915:
912:
908:
905:
901:
900:
895:
891:
890:
886:
879:
875:
871:
867:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
851:
848:
833:
829:
825:
820:
815:
814:
813:
809:
805:
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
784:
780:
776:
772:
771:
770:
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
758:
754:
750:
745:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:
673:
672:
668:
664:
660:
659:
654:
650:
646:
638:
636:
621:
617:
611:
608:
607:
604:
587:
583:
579:
578:
573:
570:
566:
565:
561:
555:
552:
549:
545:
532:
528:
522:
519:
518:
515:
498:
494:
490:
489:
484:
481:
477:
476:
472:
466:
463:
460:
456:
443:
439:
433:
430:
429:
426:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
388:
380:
374:
369:
367:
364:
360:
359:
355:
349:
346:
343:
339:
334:
330:
324:
316:
315:
305:
301:
296:
295:
287:
283:
279:
278:
273:
269:
266:
262:
261:
253:
249:
245:
243:
242:
223:
222:
217:
213:
205:
202:
200:
196:
195:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
133:
132:
124:
123:Verifiability
121:
119:
116:
114:
111:
110:
109:
100:
96:
94:
91:
89:
85:
82:
80:
77:
76:
70:
66:
65:Learn to edit
62:
59:
54:
53:
50:
49:
45:
39:
35:
31:
30:
23:
20:
18:
17:
959:accurately.
957:
938:
935:
916:
913:
909:
906:
902:
896:
892:
882:
844:
818:
677:
656:
652:
648:
644:
642:
635:
615:
582:project page
575:
526:
486:
437:
385:
329:WikiProjects
312:
275:
211:
197:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
107:
32:This is the
961:76.14.8.195
914:Sincerely,
396:volcanology
280:section on
277:On this day
161:free images
44:not a forum
994:Categories
804:Strausszek
749:Strausszek
700:this edit
653:Chronicle
586:talk page
413:Volcanoes
392:volcanoes
348:Volcanoes
317:is rated
272:Main Page
101:if needed
84:Be polite
34:talk page
682:WP:UNDUE
212:365Â days
199:Archives
69:get help
42:This is
40:article.
977:hike395
870:hike395
775:hike395
708:hike395
686:hike395
663:llywrch
618:on the
529:on the
440:on the
319:B-class
274:in the
248:summary
167:WPÂ refs
155:scholar
744:WP:OWN
704:WP:POV
402:, and
325:scale.
139:Google
919:Pfoss
887:and
306:This
182:JSTOR
143:books
97:Seek
981:talk
965:talk
945:talk
923:talk
874:talk
854:talk
828:talk
808:talk
779:talk
753:talk
712:talk
690:talk
667:talk
610:High
284:and
175:FENS
149:news
86:and
521:Mid
432:Top
189:TWL
996::
983:)
967:)
947:)
925:)
876:)
856:)
830:)
810:)
781:)
755:)
714:)
692:)
669:)
398:,
394:,
246:A
210::
169:)
67:;
979:(
963:(
943:(
921:(
872:(
852:(
826:(
806:(
777:(
751:(
710:(
688:(
665:(
622:.
588:.
533:.
444:.
331:.
288:.
254:.
204:1
201::
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
71:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
