1106:
776:
755:
465:
444:
293:
719:
683:
475:
1171:
1150:
607:
576:
1122:
617:
1090:
1181:
350:
326:
1538:"? Reuters says "a co-founder of an Israeli consulting firm". NYT says "social media specialist" and "specialist in social media manipulation". So we three options to pick from, based on two sources. If we pick "specialist in social media manipulation", then we should treat "manipulation" as an allegation and take Zamel's denial (that actually comes from Zamel's mouthpiece) into account. Why use a
1074:
959:
211:
1319:. That's not allowed. Editors must neutrally present what RS say, warts and all, with their biases intact. When I checked the source, I found it was even worse than I imagined. The content was much stronger, and the relatively mild description was removed using a bogus edit summary. I then went to work to present what was actually in the source, with attribution and denial, as required.
786:
284:
1031:
1020:
1009:
707:
412:
899:
860:
1573:? The one that says "specialist in social media manipulation" or the one that says "social media specialist"? Actually, the first paragraph says "an Israeli specialist in social media manipulation" without mentioning Zamel by name. If we don't mention Zamel by name in the article, then no denial is needed. And how is your comment
998:
987:
360:
1447:
No. Resorting to direct quoting is what you do when the source itself is meaningful (either because it's dubious or because the source itself is involved in the action being described). In this case, the NYT article is itself reporting what anonymous other people who know what happened at the meeting
1402:
In August 2016, Donald Trump Jr. had a meeting with Prince, George Nader (an envoy for princes who led Saudi Arabia and the United Arab
Emirates) and Joel Zamel, a social media specialist. Zamel extolled his company’s ability to give an edge to a political campaign; his firm having already drawn up a
1633:
Agreed. The context indicates he was chosen, not just because he was a generic, dime-a-dozen, "specialist in social media", but because he's a expert at manipulating it. That's what they wanted and needed. That word is the defining reason this is even relevant, so it's perfectly proper to follow the
1490:
The article is about Prince, not about Zamel, and the inclusion of additional info about Zamel's background was off-topic and non-neutral. It's enough to say he was an
Israeli specialist in social media manipulation. If there's a better way to descibe Zamel in an appositive phrase then I'm all ears,
1486:
We shouldn't be including what Trump Jr.'s lawyer said about the meeting, even with attribution, because the lawyer is most definitely NOT a reliable source. If the lawyer's statement became news itself, then it could be added, but at least as it was written it came off as the lawyer getting their
1368:
Yes, it's part of the subject of that whole section. It describes his connection with meetings involving Trump campaign people, and efforts to help Trump win. It's pretty simple, and more is being documented all the time. The investigation is now delving much deeper into the meeting(s) in the
1619:
here, attribution to
Reuters is not really necessary and the version he reverted to is more concise. I'm not sure about the exact wording but I don't think "manipulation" is pejorative here, I've seen it used in academic books so it seems fine for us to use it as
1113:
878:
1129:
882:
1394:"Reuters" reported that a "company connected to Zamel also worked on a proposal for a 'covert multimillion-dollar online manipulation campaign' to help Trump, utilizing thousands of fake social media accounts, the New York Times report said."
1742:. Adding links detracts from readability, so if they aren't necessary, don't add them. In the case of two mentions in the same paragraph, the first will have already been read before the second is found, so a 2nd link is not necessary.
1266:
There are many grammatical errors in this article. It seems to be below the normal standards not only for
Knowledge (XXG), but for English in general. Bad English seems to be a trend more and more prevalent. Is it a generational thing?
1722:
I think blackwater should be linked to
Academi because a lot of people know the name blackwater better and might be interested in opening the link. An exception should be made and put two links to the same site in the same paragraph
1097:
874:
153:
1944:
1479:, I think you misunderstood the purpose of my revert, which is understandable because there were multiple things wrong with that content and it was difficult to express them all in my edit summary.
1954:
1949:
1762:
1959:
1854:
505:
297:
1809:
263:
1914:
1829:
1322:
Was there some type of confusion or misunderstanding here? Keep in mind that I am not saying my wording couldn't be improved, but complete deletion is uncalled for. Try applying
832:
426:
522:
972:
949:
911:
692:
586:
1929:
1879:
697:
1297:, coupled with this edit summary ("rm unnecessary in-text attribution, excessive wordiness, and factual info coming from a wildly unreliable source"), really puzzles me.
202:
1556:
The New York Times. The word "manipulation" is not really pejorative in this context, and it's certainly not something that needs to be alleged since it's not illegal.-
1672:
558:
958:
732:
590:
147:
1894:
1834:
737:
268:
1934:
1924:
1909:
1884:
1849:
1824:
939:
548:
1799:
512:
1939:
79:
1660:
1592:
1899:
1784:
1794:
1239:
842:
673:
1874:
1859:
251:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1081:
870:
517:
421:
336:
378:
243:
1969:
1869:
1814:
1229:
663:
906:
865:
1889:
1690:
1669:
1600:
1596:
85:
1844:
1839:
1804:
1424:
That's blatant whitewashing and manipulation of the source, IOW an NPOV violation. Since it's a strong allegation, exact quoting is necessary. --
382:
1974:
1919:
1904:
1684:
1205:
808:
639:
488:
449:
915:
1681:
1675:
30:
1301:, I would expect that type of revert and summary from some driveby, extreme right-wing, IP vandal, not an experienced editor. What gives?
1598:
1350:
Was any of that edit about Prince? It didn't seem to be. Frankly, it reads like someone throwing stuff on a wall hoping some will stick.
377:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
1819:
1678:
44:
1964:
1864:
1766:
500:
386:
373:
331:
99:
1194:
1155:
799:
760:
630:
581:
104:
20:
1494:
If a fact is supported by a reliable source and uncontradicted then in-text attribution is unnecessary and in fact can be seen as
496:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
1687:
74:
1789:
306:
190:
1594:
65:
168:
135:
1448:
said, so unless your contention that it's important that the NYT reported it, that simply is part of the reference.
210:
198:
194:
185:
252:
109:
1692:
The sources say "social media specialist", "social media expert", "entrepreneur", or "co-founder" (your source).
807:
articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1305:
221:
312:
129:
910:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
1666:
1639:
1525:
1503:
1429:
1374:
1331:
1105:
1512:
55:
1491:
but I wouldn't support a full sentence about something he did that has no apparent connection to Prince.
1280:
1204:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
724:
638:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
125:
1739:
1323:
70:
1728:
1697:
1621:
1582:
1547:
480:
262:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
1663:
283:
1487:
totally unreliable say about what happened in the meeting into our article. I won't stand for that.
175:
161:
775:
754:
266:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
226:
1724:
1539:
464:
443:
259:
1749:
1635:
1616:
1521:
1499:
1476:
1455:
1425:
1413:
1370:
1357:
1327:
1298:
51:
1403:
multimillion-dollar proposal for a social media manipulation effort to help elect Mr. Trump.
1276:
365:
223:
1495:
1400:
If this is going to be added, it should probably replace the paragraph with something like:
682:
1693:
1578:
1543:
1186:
791:
622:
141:
616:
606:
575:
1778:
1606:
1560:
493:
1170:
1149:
1743:
1449:
1407:
1351:
1121:
1398:
also reported that Trump Jr.'s attorney said that "nothing came of the meeting".
24:
1073:
349:
325:
1176:
781:
714:
612:
470:
355:
1089:
492:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
785:
1603:
1557:
1200:
804:
635:
225:
1198:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of
706:
1498:
and casting unnecessary doubt on the source. It should be avoided. --
1369:
Seychelles, and Prince was a key person. It's very much on-topic. --
1770:
1755:
1732:
1701:
1652:
1628:
1610:
1586:
1564:
1551:
1529:
1507:
1461:
1442:
1419:
1387:
1363:
1344:
1284:
898:
859:
385:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
1312:
be attributed very carefully, and we're dealing with two very RS.
411:
1515:
Material that can be readily paraphrased should be paraphrased.
1534:
What's the basis of calling Zamel "specialist in social media
277:
258:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
235:
227:
15:
1120:
1104:
1088:
1072:
957:
705:
681:
410:
1316:
1294:
1542:
at all? Why make things more difficult than they are?
160:
1945:
Start-Class North
American military history articles
970:
This article has been checked against the following
803:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
634:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
1955:
Start-Class United States military history articles
1950:
North American military history task force articles
1055:
969:
174:
1960:United States military history task force articles
1855:C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
1810:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles in People
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
8:
1915:Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
1830:Mid-importance biography (military) articles
924:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Military history
1144:
1114:North American military history task force
1052:
966:
854:
749:
570:
438:
320:
1930:Start-Class biography (military) articles
1880:Low-importance American politics articles
1130:United States military history task force
533:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject United States
1800:Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in People
904:This article is within the scope of the
1146:
856:
751:
572:
440:
322:
281:
1895:Low-importance Libertarianism articles
1835:Military biography work group articles
1795:Knowledge (XXG) level-5 vital articles
1763:2603:3007:2396:4100:C0E:983E:99B3:D1E8
1574:
1401:
1393:
914:. To use this banner, please see the
1935:Start-Class maritime warfare articles
1925:Start-Class military history articles
1910:C-Class WikiProject Business articles
1885:American politics task force articles
1850:Mid-importance United States articles
1825:C-Class biography (military) articles
1304:We're dealing with an application of
1290:Reuters and NYTimes = WP:PUBLICFIGURE
927:Template:WikiProject Military history
395:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography
7:
1940:Maritime warfare task force articles
1271:Cspan Aug 11 2017 Washington Journal
1214:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Michigan
1192:This article is within the scope of
817:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Business
797:This article is within the scope of
648:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Politics
628:This article is within the scope of
486:This article is within the scope of
371:This article is within the scope of
1900:WikiProject Libertarianism articles
1785:Biography articles of living people
311:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1875:C-Class American politics articles
1860:WikiProject United States articles
1317:NPOV "neutering of a RS" violation
536:Template:WikiProject United States
14:
422:the military biography work group
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1970:Low-importance Michigan articles
1870:Low-importance politics articles
1815:C-Class vital articles in People
1761:THANKS FOR BE IN THE SERVICE SR
1179:
1169:
1148:
1029:
1018:
1007:
996:
985:
897:
858:
784:
774:
753:
717:
615:
605:
574:
473:
463:
442:
358:
348:
324:
291:
282:
241:This article must adhere to the
209:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1890:C-Class Libertarianism articles
1718:Link to Academi from blackwater
1234:This article has been rated as
944:This article has been rated as
837:This article has been rated as
668:This article has been rated as
553:This article has been rated as
1845:C-Class United States articles
1840:WikiProject Biography articles
1805:C-Class level-5 vital articles
1771:21:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
398:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
1975:WikiProject Michigan articles
1920:WikiProject Business articles
1905:WikiProject Politics articles
1756:01:35, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
1733:21:12, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
1659:I call your bluff and raise:
1513:Avoid unnecessary quotations.
1496:treating a fact as an opinion
1217:Template:WikiProject Michigan
1208:and see a list of open tasks.
1082:Military biography task force
823:WikiProject Business articles
820:Template:WikiProject Business
811:and see a list of open tasks.
730:This article is supported by
690:This article is supported by
651:Template:WikiProject Politics
642:and see a list of open tasks.
419:This article is supported by
244:biographies of living persons
42:Put new text under old text.
907:Military history WikiProject
693:American politics task force
383:contribute to the discussion
1634:source(s) which use it. --
1285:11:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
1098:Maritime warfare task force
256:must be removed immediately
1991:
1820:C-Class biography articles
1315:I was literally fixing an
1275:Good content for article!
1240:project's importance scale
990:Referencing and citation:
843:project's importance scale
733:WikiProject Libertarianism
674:project's importance scale
559:project's importance scale
1965:C-Class Michigan articles
1865:C-Class politics articles
1702:14:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
1653:21:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1629:21:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1611:21:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1587:21:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1565:17:56, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1552:14:20, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1233:
1164:
1128:
1112:
1096:
1080:
1051:
943:
930:military history articles
892:
836:
769:
713:
689:
667:
600:
552:
489:WikiProject United States
458:
418:
343:
319:
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1575:"since it's not illegal"
1530:19:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1508:19:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1462:17:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1443:16:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1420:15:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1388:06:56, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1364:05:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
1345:04:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
494:United States of America
1056:Associated task forces:
1001:Coverage and accuracy:
1790:C-Class vital articles
1125:
1109:
1093:
1077:
1034:Supporting materials:
962:
710:
686:
539:United States articles
415:
75:avoid personal attacks
1308:, so the allegations
1124:
1108:
1092:
1076:
961:
725:Libertarianism portal
709:
685:
414:
374:WikiProject Biography
305:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
298:level-5 vital article
203:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
1195:WikiProject Michigan
800:WikiProject Business
631:WikiProject Politics
481:United States portal
105:No original research
1392:Your addition was:
1023:Grammar and style:
976:for B-class status:
507:Articles Requested!
1571:The New York Times
1126:
1110:
1094:
1078:
963:
912:list of open tasks
711:
687:
416:
401:biography articles
307:content assessment
86:dispute resolution
47:
1650:
1540:contentious label
1440:
1385:
1342:
1254:
1253:
1250:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1220:Michigan articles
1143:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1135:
1134:
1047:
1046:
1003:criterion not met
992:criterion not met
948:on the project's
916:full instructions
853:
852:
849:
848:
748:
747:
744:
743:
654:politics articles
569:
568:
565:
564:
437:
436:
433:
432:
276:
275:
234:
233:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1982:
1752:
1644:
1626:
1537:
1458:
1434:
1416:
1379:
1360:
1336:
1222:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1212:
1189:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1173:
1166:
1165:
1160:
1152:
1145:
1063:
1053:
1037:
1033:
1032:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1015:
1011:
1010:
1004:
1000:
999:
993:
989:
988:
967:
932:
931:
928:
925:
922:
921:Military history
901:
894:
893:
888:
885:
866:Military history
862:
855:
825:
824:
821:
818:
815:
794:
789:
788:
778:
771:
770:
765:
757:
750:
727:
722:
721:
720:
656:
655:
652:
649:
646:
625:
620:
619:
609:
602:
601:
596:
593:
578:
571:
541:
540:
537:
534:
531:
483:
478:
477:
476:
467:
460:
459:
454:
446:
439:
403:
402:
399:
396:
393:
379:join the project
368:
366:Biography portal
363:
362:
361:
352:
345:
344:
339:
328:
321:
304:
295:
294:
287:
286:
278:
264:this noticeboard
236:
228:
214:
213:
204:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1990:
1989:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1775:
1774:
1750:
1720:
1624:Seraphim System
1622:
1535:
1456:
1414:
1358:
1306:WP:PUBLICFIGURE
1292:
1273:
1264:
1219:
1216:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1187:Michigan portal
1185:
1180:
1178:
1158:
1061:
1035:
1030:
1024:
1019:
1013:
1008:
1002:
997:
991:
986:
929:
926:
923:
920:
919:
886:
868:
822:
819:
816:
813:
812:
792:Business portal
790:
783:
763:
723:
718:
716:
653:
650:
647:
644:
643:
623:Politics portal
621:
614:
594:
584:
538:
535:
532:
529:
528:
527:
513:Become a Member
479:
474:
472:
452:
400:
397:
394:
391:
390:
364:
359:
357:
334:
302:
292:
230:
229:
224:
201:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1988:
1986:
1978:
1977:
1972:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1947:
1942:
1937:
1932:
1927:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1892:
1887:
1882:
1877:
1872:
1867:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1807:
1802:
1797:
1792:
1787:
1777:
1776:
1759:
1758:
1719:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1617:Dr. Fleischman
1522:Dr. Fleischman
1518:
1517:
1516:
1510:
1500:Dr. Fleischman
1492:
1488:
1481:
1480:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1405:
1291:
1288:
1272:
1269:
1263:
1260:
1258:
1252:
1251:
1248:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1236:Low-importance
1232:
1226:
1225:
1223:
1206:the discussion
1191:
1190:
1174:
1162:
1161:
1159:Low‑importance
1153:
1141:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1127:
1117:
1116:
1111:
1101:
1100:
1095:
1085:
1084:
1079:
1069:
1068:
1066:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1027:
1016:
1005:
994:
980:
979:
977:
964:
954:
953:
942:
936:
935:
933:
902:
890:
889:
863:
851:
850:
847:
846:
839:Low-importance
835:
829:
828:
826:
809:the discussion
796:
795:
779:
767:
766:
764:Low‑importance
758:
746:
745:
742:
741:
738:Low-importance
729:
728:
712:
702:
701:
698:Low-importance
688:
678:
677:
670:Low-importance
666:
660:
659:
657:
640:the discussion
627:
626:
610:
598:
597:
595:Low‑importance
591:Libertarianism
579:
567:
566:
563:
562:
555:Mid-importance
551:
545:
544:
542:
526:
525:
520:
515:
510:
503:
501:Template Usage
497:
485:
484:
468:
456:
455:
453:Mid‑importance
447:
435:
434:
431:
430:
427:Mid-importance
417:
407:
406:
404:
370:
369:
353:
341:
340:
329:
317:
316:
310:
288:
274:
273:
269:this help page
253:poorly sourced
239:
232:
231:
222:
220:
219:
216:
215:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1987:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1968:
1966:
1963:
1961:
1958:
1956:
1953:
1951:
1948:
1946:
1943:
1941:
1938:
1936:
1933:
1931:
1928:
1926:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1913:
1911:
1908:
1906:
1903:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1893:
1891:
1888:
1886:
1883:
1881:
1878:
1876:
1873:
1871:
1868:
1866:
1863:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1831:
1828:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1816:
1813:
1811:
1808:
1806:
1803:
1801:
1798:
1796:
1793:
1791:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1780:
1773:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1757:
1753:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1717:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1688:
1685:
1682:
1679:
1676:
1673:
1670:
1667:
1664:
1661:
1658:
1654:
1651:
1649:
1648:
1641:
1637:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1627:
1625:
1618:
1615:I agree with
1614:
1613:
1612:
1608:
1605:
1601:
1599:
1597:
1595:
1593:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1562:
1559:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1533:
1532:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1514:
1511:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1484:
1483:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1463:
1459:
1453:
1452:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1441:
1439:
1438:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1417:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1404:
1399:
1397:
1391:
1390:
1389:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1376:
1372:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1361:
1355:
1354:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1343:
1341:
1340:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1318:
1313:
1311:
1307:
1302:
1300:
1296:
1289:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1270:
1268:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1241:
1237:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1224:
1207:
1203:
1202:
1197:
1196:
1188:
1177:
1175:
1172:
1168:
1167:
1163:
1157:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1131:
1123:
1119:
1118:
1115:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1099:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1075:
1071:
1070:
1067:
1065:
1060:
1059:
1054:
1050:
1043:
1041:
1036:criterion met
1028:
1025:criterion met
1017:
1014:criterion met
1006:
995:
984:
983:
982:
981:
978:
975:
974:
968:
965:
960:
956:
955:
951:
950:quality scale
947:
941:
938:
937:
934:
917:
913:
909:
908:
903:
900:
896:
895:
891:
884:
883:United States
880:
879:North America
876:
872:
867:
864:
861:
857:
844:
840:
834:
831:
830:
827:
810:
806:
802:
801:
793:
787:
782:
780:
777:
773:
772:
768:
762:
759:
756:
752:
739:
736:(assessed as
735:
734:
726:
715:
708:
704:
703:
699:
696:(assessed as
695:
694:
684:
680:
679:
675:
671:
665:
662:
661:
658:
641:
637:
633:
632:
624:
618:
613:
611:
608:
604:
603:
599:
592:
588:
583:
580:
577:
573:
560:
556:
550:
547:
546:
543:
530:United States
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
508:
504:
502:
499:
498:
495:
491:
490:
482:
471:
469:
466:
462:
461:
457:
451:
450:United States
448:
445:
441:
428:
425:(assessed as
424:
423:
413:
409:
408:
405:
388:
387:documentation
384:
380:
376:
375:
367:
356:
354:
351:
347:
346:
342:
338:
333:
330:
327:
323:
318:
314:
308:
300:
299:
289:
285:
280:
279:
271:
270:
265:
261:
257:
254:
250:
246:
245:
240:
238:
237:
218:
217:
212:
208:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1760:
1744:
1721:
1646:
1645:
1643:
1636:BullRangifer
1623:
1570:
1536:manipulation
1477:BullRangifer
1450:
1436:
1435:
1433:
1426:BullRangifer
1408:
1395:
1381:
1380:
1378:
1371:BullRangifer
1352:
1338:
1337:
1335:
1328:BullRangifer
1321:
1314:
1309:
1303:
1299:DrFleischman
1293:
1274:
1265:
1257:
1255:
1235:
1199:
1193:
971:
945:
905:
838:
798:
731:
691:
669:
629:
554:
518:Project Talk
506:
487:
420:
372:
313:WikiProjects
296:
267:
255:
248:
242:
206:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
1740:WP:OVERLINK
1324:WP:PRESERVE
1295:This revert
1277:Wikipietime
1012:Structure:
946:Start-class
887:Start‑class
148:free images
31:not a forum
25:Erik Prince
1779:Categories
1694:Politrukki
1579:Politrukki
1577:relevant?
1544:Politrukki
871:Biography
392:Biography
332:Biography
301:is rated
260:libellous
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
1211:Michigan
1201:Michigan
1156:Michigan
973:criteria
875:Maritime
814:Business
805:business
761:Business
645:Politics
636:politics
587:American
582:Politics
337:Military
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
1751:discuss
1745:Tarl N.
1457:discuss
1451:Tarl N.
1415:discuss
1409:Tarl N.
1396:Reuters
1359:discuss
1353:Tarl N.
1262:Grammar
1238:on the
841:on the
672:on the
557:on the
303:C-class
207:90 days
154:WP refs
142:scholar
1647:PingMe
1569:Which
1437:PingMe
1382:PingMe
1339:PingMe
523:Alerts
309:scale.
126:Google
1725:Nuk3n
1620:well.
1591:Also
1326:. --
940:Start
290:This
191:Index
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1767:talk
1738:See
1729:talk
1698:talk
1640:talk
1583:talk
1548:talk
1526:talk
1504:talk
1430:talk
1375:talk
1332:talk
1310:must
1281:talk
381:and
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1609:🖋
1602:.-
1563:🖋
1230:Low
833:Low
664:Low
549:Mid
249:BLP
176:TWL
1781::
1769:)
1754:)
1731:)
1700:)
1689:,
1686:,
1683:,
1680:,
1677:,
1674:,
1671:,
1668:,
1665:,
1662:,
1642:)
1604:Mr
1585:)
1558:Mr
1550:)
1528:)
1520:--
1506:)
1460:)
1432:)
1418:)
1377:)
1362:)
1334:)
1283:)
1062:/
881:/
877:/
873:/
869::
740:).
700:).
589:/
585::
429:).
335::
205::
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1765:(
1748:(
1727:(
1696:(
1638:(
1607:X
1581:(
1561:X
1546:(
1524:(
1502:(
1454:(
1428:(
1412:(
1373:(
1356:(
1330:(
1279:(
1242:.
952:.
918:.
845:.
676:.
561:.
389:.
315::
272:.
247:(
199:2
195:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
