Knowledge

Talk:Ethan Van Sciver

Source 📝

433: 415: 1451:, which suggests it lacks any editorial oversight. Opinion/contributor pieces, even from highly respected sources such as Forbes.com, are generally disallowed. This is especially true for such a significant claim in wikivoice; if Van Sciver owns the trademark, it should be relatively easy to find and source the claim from a more reputable outlet. I'm not challenging the fact, but a better source is needed for it. To use Critical Blast would, I think, require some input from 181: 526: 363: 244: 213: 119: 95: 64: 254: 383: 129: 1148:
Thank you for clarifying. Please note that I am not questioning whether Van Sciver has engaged in Political Commentary on his channel. Neither am I questioning that some of that commentary has been categorised as right-wing by some sources. What I am questioning is whether this is sufficient to make
1032:
I am a big fan from the moment I found this man's work in 1996. I own a full set of what I assume is the original Cyberfrog, first issue February 1996 published by Harris comics. Ethan created, drew, and wrote the series, which has never failed to impress me on the many times I have revisited it. It
942:
While I do have personal opinions about Van Sciver (I bet you do too), they don't prevent me from editing the article fairly and objectively. I'm trying to discuss what's noteworthy enough to include in an encyclopedia article about him. The only obstacles to that are those you've thrown in the way,
692:
In addition to his illustration work, Van Sciver has received significant media attention for expressions of his sociopolitical views, a fact which is not reflected in the article currently. It seems to be particularly relevant to his recent transition from a regular DC freelancer, to concentrating
1759:
I want to know what people think of this source. On one hand, Grandpallama raises its connection to a university, however Arcadia Darell raises points about the lack of knowledge of its editorial oversight, limited posts, and short duration making it seem to be self-published. I want to know what
1660:
It provides no information on what the newsletters are based on and whether or not there is any editorial oversight. I'm not questioning whether this think tank is in principle capable of providing reliable research in its field, I am arguing that an unspecified newsletter from that think tank, a
1493:
Critical Blast is a well-known mouthpiece for Comicsgate advocates; we don't consider similar "news" sites (Bounding Into Comics, Bleeding Fool) to be RS. In this case, it's compounded by the fact that CriticalBlast is also a publisher and crowdfunding assistant of Comicsgate-related materials. I
1345:
The "Political commentary" section lists various events that people might characterise as "right-wing", but it's not clear how many of those actually happened on his YouTube channel. Van Sciver literally seems to have thousands of hours of commentary on his channel. At what point does "right-wing
1003:
IMDB has some TV credits that have twice been added to this article, incorrectly implying that Van Sciver worked on those series. These were characters that he co-created in comics that were later used for the TV series, and the series credits him for that because that's how credits work. Listing
820:
I'm not disputing that Sciver is a prominent figure in Fandom Menace, but the source cited doesn't directly prove it. I've removed it once, and it's been reinstated. It mentions Sciver in passing, but given the contentious nature of the subject matter, I would suggest a source that quotes Sciver
1472:
Where do you see that Critical Blast advertises itself as a logistics company etc.? What I have found is the statement that "Critical Blast is dedicated to delivering news, reviews, opinions and interviews from the field of entertainment and pop culture." both in the bottom and in the "About"
697:
if you don't know what I'm talking about.) Because his views are highly polarizing and likely to invite edit-warring, I think it would be useful to first discuss and develop some consensus here about how to present this information in the article, what sources to use, etc.
1447:. It advertises itself as a logistics company that aids in putting together crowdfunding efforts and has a link to a store where it sells products--neither of which is encouraging. In the "About Us" link, it specifically states about its articles that 1626:
through Substack, it's also published directly on the institute's webpage, as you may have noticed in reproducing the URL for the citation; it would still be a RS even if we were using a Substack link to it. It absolutely does not fall under
544: 1104:
allows for lead sections to forego inline sources provided that the statement is substantiated in the article itself. In this particular case, I have not been able to find a corresponding / substantiating statement in the text.
1621:
CTEC is the newsletter published by the Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism; it's a thinktank that is part of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. While the newsletter is
1008:
his work, but he had no personal involvement in, would be like listing every movie based on a play by Shakespeare (which we do not do). Leave the exhaustive listing of every place his name appears to IMDB; that's
1798: 195: 833:
what we write. The first source identifies EVS as one of the group's leaders. (I've added another.) A quote from him wouldn't "prove" anything one way or the other; he might falsely claim or deny involvement.
1793: 795:
It's actually wholly unimportant and unrelated to Sciver himself. It has no place in the article at all. Now, if you wanted to include him doing stuff like cutting up effigies of Last Jedi characters...
1479:
I accept your concern about the statement being made in wikivoice. Would you consider it to be acceptable if the wording is softened / elaborated and ideally substantiated by additional source(s)?
392: 227: 1425:
Critical Blast publishes news, reviews, opinions and interviews from the field of entertainment and pop culture, including comics. It employs multiple writers, editors, and correspondents.
956:" but that was more than a fan nickname... the media routinely referred to him that way, to the point that if you said it to any random person on the street, they'd know who it was. - 372: 223: 1823: 919:
The editor here is biased. And has shown to be biased, as demonstrated by his user page. I request a third party be involved. If not, then there will be no conversation of any kind.
190: 105: 952:
we should dispense with WP's formal tone and its focus on noteworthy facts, and feature the pet name his fans use with each other in the lede? The closest precedent I can find is "
1858: 473: 613: 1803: 43: 1134:
There's an entire section called "Political commentary", where this claim is elaborated on with citations to both Buzzfeed and The Daily Beast that explicitly support this.
1838: 1843: 575: 479: 1116:
I simply cannot see where the lead statement is substantiated in the main body. If there are reliable sources that make this specific claim, they should be referenced.
1098:
The lead section contains the assertion that Van Sciver's YouTube channel "focused on right-wing social commentary" in the late 2010s. No inline source is provided.
1863: 1853: 562: 1828: 1306:
Yet another route would be to adapt the main body to be in line with the lead section. One would have to make sure that such a change would be properly sourced.
589: 558: 277: 1833: 1783: 48: 1410: 600: 449: 31:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 1548:, in which eight people, including six Asian women, were killed, Van Sciver referenced the incident during a livestream group discussion on film director 1033:
should be included in this article, as it is a seminal accomplishment, not just something he has done for a major publisher. Thank you for your work sir.
283: 1723:
The CTEC Newsletter is a product of CTEC, which is part of MIIS. There is no question about its being a reliable source. The Twitter link is being used
1375:
Neither the Buzzfeed nor the Daily Beast article directly support the claim that Van Sciver's YouTube channel focused on right-wing social commentary.
287: 1818: 1808: 1788: 1670:
Addendum: the Substack has literally 6 posts and was seemingly abandoned after. It was alive for less than a year. It's just not a serious source.
342: 329: 319: 147: 23: 440: 420: 1848: 1813: 151: 1168:
Also note the term "right-wing" is not used in the article. Neither is there any substantiation of this being a focus of his content.
803: 673: 155: 551: 295: 1512:
I was unaware that "Critical Blast is a well-known mouthpiece for Comicsgate". Do you have any information that I could read up on?
146:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 1661:
newsletter which is expressly stated to contain material from students, does not meet the requirements of being a reliable source.
768: 694: 1449:
The opinions shared are those of the respective authors, and may not reflect the opinions of CriticalBlast.com or its management
142: 100: 1361: 731:
It's a bit ambiguous whether Sciver references the word or the movement here (which indeed he very well might be aware of).
1476:
The disclaimer you mention seems to be a standard disclaimer to me. It does not imply that all articles are opinion pieces.
1349:
To state it was a focus of his channel (again without sources) is an extrapolation and interpretation of the material that
1364:. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are 1411:
https://www.criticalblast.com/articles/2023/01/12/ethan-van-sciver-secures-trademark-comicsgate-what-means-going-forward
569: 538: 267: 218: 75: 1552:, commenting, "He'll never stop me from killing Chinese people, ever. I don't care how many movies he makes. Give me a 1062:
Thank you, Psycho D. Welcome to Knowledge. Just so you know, content on Knowledge must adhere to policies that include
713:
I'm puzzled by the change from saying he "has been" a central figure in Comicsgate to "was". This is contradicted by
1255:
I'm afraid you are not addressing my point. My apologies if I have not made it sufficiently clear. Let me reiterate:
1047:
Ps...I am also willing to send pictures of the issues I have to the editor of this article to help show his talent.
1545: 1215:
Which RS specifically? None are quoted inline in the lead section. The article body does not make the same claim.
1760:
others think. Given this is BLP I lean towards removal, but I am not too committed and could change. Thoughts?
1311:
I have initially opted for 1 because it does not require me to defend somebody else's seemingly unsourced claim.
1714: 1678: 1611: 1520: 1484: 1433: 1380: 1319: 1220: 1173: 1124: 291: 63: 929: 32: 1303:
An alternative route would be to provide additional sources that support the statement in the lead section.
1740: 1640: 1503: 1460: 1444: 1333: 1328:
The lead accurately summarizes the content of the "Political commentary" section, which is what leads do.
1246: 1206: 1139: 807: 677: 1710: 1674: 1607: 1516: 1480: 1429: 1376: 1315: 1216: 1169: 1120: 1428:
Please clarify how this source is unreliable or refrain from reverting the edit in question. Thank you.
1083: 1052: 1038: 1018: 984: 961: 909: 750: 722: 703: 81: 1314:
I am unsure where our disagreement arises. Do you dispute that the two statements above are different?
1572: 432: 414: 839: 799: 786: 772: 669: 42:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 1765: 1728: 1694: 1632: 1048: 1034: 781:
That's a valid criticism. I've borrowed the description from the Comicsgate article and added it.
745:
Nearly every article about Comicsgate as an ongoing campaign identifies him as a central figure. -
448:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1583: 1286:, which originally featured demonstrations of illustration tools and techniques, but which later 1229:
I have already responded to this, and your claim is demonstrably false. This is addressed by the
925: 655: 46:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 180: 1736: 1732: 1727:
to provide a citation for the full quotation by Van Sciver, which is entirely covered by both
1636: 1628: 1594: 1590:
Unless a reliable source can be provided, the paragraph is nonsensical and should be removed.
1579: 1568: 1499: 1456: 1416: 1329: 1242: 1238: 1202: 1135: 1109: 736: 714: 648:
How is this guy's last name pronounced? Van Skeever? Sky-ver? Siver like the sci in science?
1128: 1079: 1014: 980: 957: 905: 746: 718: 699: 134: 854:
I don't see encyclopedic value in putting affectionate nicknames in the lede. The article
1279: 835: 782: 39: 1233:
of the "Political commentary" section, which is reliably sourced. Your edits here and at
1761: 1494:
think you either need to find a more vetted and reliable source, or get consensus from
582: 525: 1300:
My initial edit was a suggestion to bring the lead section in line with the main body.
1777: 1495: 1452: 1354: 1071: 1067: 896: 886: 649: 259: 681: 661: 1101: 1075: 976: 953: 894:, etc. Unless the subject is formally credited by a nickname as a stage name (e.g. 876: 826: 732: 445: 1455:
as to whether there is consensus that it is reliable enough to make such a claim.
1346:
social commentary" become a focus? Which source is stating that this is the case?
1567:
The first source is a substack newsletter and therefore does not qualify as per
1549: 1063: 866: 830: 1697:"Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information 382: 118: 94: 1269: 1234: 975:
I assume that his "objections" no longer stand, and I've made the appropriate
362: 253: 249: 124: 1553: 243: 212: 1769: 1744: 1718: 1682: 1644: 1615: 1603:
As per my statement above, the current paragraph is not properly sourced.
1524: 1507: 1488: 1464: 1437: 1384: 1337: 1323: 1288:
focused on commentary about comics, other comics creators, and fan culture
1250: 1224: 1210: 1177: 1143: 1087: 1056: 1042: 1022: 988: 933: 913: 843: 811: 790: 776: 754: 740: 726: 707: 1557: 943:
such as insulting me and demanding that my editing privileges be revoked.
856: 1515:
I will try to find a better source and/or get consensus as you suggest.
904:
of their fandom, it's overly familiar, and doesn't belong in the lede. -
1262: 604: 607:
to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
1606:
Please clarify or kindly refrain from reverting my edits. Thank you.
1094:
Right-wing social commentary as focus of Van Sciver's YouTube Channel
272: 1657: 1578:
The second source is a tweet and therefore does not qualify as per
1573:
https://www.ctec-middlebury.org/p/ctec-newsletter-3-marchapril-2021
154:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 1563:
The two sources used for this statement are not reliable sources:
900:) or routinely referred to by a nickname by journalists or others 1360:" includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that 1584:
https://twitter.com/rewritingripley/status/1372626199969554434
1183:
What I am questioning is whether this is sufficient to make a
57: 38:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
15: 1409:
Ethan Van Sciver is the owner of the "Comicsgate" Trademark:
381: 361: 179: 1701:". This particular Twitter post provides information about 271:, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to 1799:
Low-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
1261:
In the late 2010s his "ComicArtistPro Secrets" channel on
1362:
reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources
1108:
My attempt to clean up the lead section was reverted by @
1541:
The article currently includes the following statement:
282:
If you would like to participate, you can help with the
1794:
Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
973: 971: 968: 944: 693:
exclusively on a previous creator-owned property. (See
514: 509: 504: 499: 1372:
the material being presented." (emphasis in original)
1201:
Yes. That is what RS report, so that is what we say.
1755:
Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism
614:
Category:Internet culture articles needing attention
444:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 340: 1297:statements. There are several possible solutions: 478:This article has not yet received a rating on the 1421:addition of info sourced to an unreliable source" 1415:My inclusion of this information was removed by @ 576:Category:Internet culture articles needing images 1556:and line them up against the wall, as the great 967:Since this editor said he was leaving Knowledge, 767:in terms of its detractors compliant with NPOV? 1119:Please clarify or refrain from reverting edit. 717:, which indicates his involvement is ongoing. - 1268:, through which he became a central figure in 1824:Start-Class Comics articles of Low-importance 1114:text supported by body and numerous sources". 8: 1859:Unknown-importance Internet culture articles 545:View all requested internet culture articles 601:Category:Internet self-classification codes 61: 1804:Arts and entertainment work group articles 1275:The "Political commentary" section states: 797: 763:How in the world is describing Comicsgate 667: 533:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 487: 409: 337: 294:the attached article or discuss it at the 207: 89: 1839:Start-Class United States comics articles 1537:Commentary following Atlanta Spa-Shooting 1844:United States comics work group articles 1705:and should therefore not be permissible. 1649:Thank you. Let's take these separately: 1266:focused on right-wing social commentary 411: 209: 91: 1498:that CriticalBlast.com is acceptable. 1448: 1182: 948:So... can anyone make an argument for 666:It's "Sky-Ver" according to himself. 458:Knowledge:WikiProject Internet culture 1864:WikiProject Internet culture articles 1854:Start-Class Internet culture articles 644:Pronunciation of Van Sciver's surname 461:Template:WikiProject Internet culture 191:the arts and entertainment work group 7: 1829:Start-Class Comics creators articles 970:and blanked his user and talk pages, 438:This article is within the scope of 265:This article is within the scope of 140:This article is within the scope of 1834:Comics creators work group articles 1784:Biography articles of living people 1631:. The Twitter citation falls under 1405:Ownership of "Comicsgate" Trademark 491:WikiProject Internet culture To-do: 80:It is of interest to the following 1599:Removal of properly sourced info". 14: 1658:https://www.ctec-middlebury.org/ 1368:to the topic of the article and 524: 431: 413: 252: 242: 211: 127: 117: 93: 62: 21:This article must adhere to the 1093: 393:United States comics work group 324:This article has been rated as 164:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 1819:Low-importance Comics articles 1809:WikiProject Biography articles 1789:Start-Class biography articles 1419:stating that my edit was the " 1088:01:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 1057:20:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1043:19:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1023:14:29, 23 September 2018 (UTC) 755:12:18, 22 September 2018 (UTC) 741:09:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC) 727:20:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC) 167:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 1745:14:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1719:23:39, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1683:23:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1645:22:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1616:22:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1525:16:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1508:14:44, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1489:23:16, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1465:22:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1438:22:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1385:16:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1338:15:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1324:15:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1251:15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1225:14:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1211:14:36, 16 February 2024 (UTC) 1178:23:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1144:22:44, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 1129:21:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC) 791:23:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC) 777:22:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC) 452:and see a list of open tasks. 390:This article is supported by 370:This article is supported by 188:This article is supported by 24:biographies of living persons 1342:I have to disagree strongly. 1278:In 2017, Van Sciver began a 682:13:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC) 441:WikiProject Internet culture 304:Knowledge:WikiProject Comics 152:contribute to the discussion 1849:WikiProject Comics articles 1814:Start-Class Comics articles 1443:Critical Blast falls under 812:17:32, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 662:08:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 307:Template:WikiProject Comics 36:must be removed immediately 1880: 1546:2021 Atlanta spa shootings 480:project's importance scale 373:Comics creators work group 330:project's importance scale 1593:My edit was reverted by @ 989:19:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC) 934:17:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 914:17:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC) 844:21:14, 28 July 2021 (UTC) 821:directly (they do exist) 708:01:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC) 486: 477: 464:Internet culture articles 426: 389: 369: 336: 323: 237: 187: 112: 88: 1770:14:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 1652:The institute's webpage 1597:referring to it as the " 1258:The lead section states: 1353:properly sourced. From 1028:Original Cyberfrog 1996 643: 1284:ComicArtistPro Secrets 1237:are increasingly of a 588:All stubs are located 386: 366: 184: 106:Arts and Entertainment 70:This article is rated 1191:that his channel has 1157:that his channel has 557:Pick an article from 385: 365: 183: 143:WikiProject Biography 1695:Knowledge:ABOUTSELF 296:project's talk page 1656:the Substack. See 1272:. (emphasis mine) 387: 367: 268:WikiProject Comics 185: 170:biography articles 76:content assessment 1580:Knowledge:SELFPUB 1569:Knowledge:SELFPUB 1290:. (emphasis mine) 1185:factual statement 1151:factual statement 890:doesn't call him 880:doesn't call her 870:doesn't call him 860:doesn't call him 850:Nicknames in lede 814: 802:comment added by 684: 672:comment added by 658: 641: 640: 637: 636: 633: 632: 629: 628: 625: 624: 603:(!?); Try to get 408: 407: 404: 403: 400: 399: 206: 205: 202: 201: 56: 55: 1871: 1699:about themselves 1370:directly support 1366:directly related 1004:things that are 922:Have a good day. 827:reliable sources 656: 652: 539:Article requests 528: 521: 520: 488: 466: 465: 462: 459: 456: 455:Internet culture 446:internet culture 435: 428: 427: 421:Internet culture 417: 410: 352: 338: 312: 311: 308: 305: 302: 262: 257: 256: 246: 239: 238: 233: 230: 215: 208: 172: 171: 168: 165: 162: 148:join the project 137: 135:Biography portal 132: 131: 130: 121: 114: 113: 108: 97: 90: 73: 67: 66: 58: 44:this noticeboard 16: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1774: 1773: 1757: 1539: 1445:WP:QUESTIONABLE 1407: 1280:YouTube channel 1096: 1030: 1001: 852: 690: 660: 650: 646: 621: 519: 463: 460: 457: 454: 453: 350: 310:Comics articles 309: 306: 303: 300: 299: 258: 251: 231: 221: 169: 166: 163: 160: 159: 133: 128: 126: 103: 74:on Knowledge's 71: 12: 11: 5: 1877: 1875: 1867: 1866: 1861: 1856: 1851: 1846: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1776: 1775: 1756: 1753: 1752: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1748: 1747: 1711:Arcadia Darell 1708: 1707: 1706: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1675:Arcadia Darell 1671: 1663: 1662: 1608:Arcadia Darell 1588: 1587: 1576: 1544:Following the 1538: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1517:Arcadia Darell 1513: 1481:Arcadia Darell 1477: 1474: 1470: 1430:Arcadia Darell 1406: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1377:Arcadia Darell 1373: 1358: 1347: 1343: 1316:Arcadia Darell 1312: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1304: 1301: 1291: 1276: 1273: 1259: 1256: 1231:first sentence 1217:Arcadia Darell 1170:Arcadia Darell 1166: 1121:Arcadia Darell 1112:stating that " 1095: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1029: 1026: 1015:Jason A. Quest 1000: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 981:Jason A. Quest 958:Jason A. Quest 946: 937: 936: 923: 920: 906:Jason A. Quest 851: 848: 847: 846: 818: 817: 816: 815: 793: 761: 760: 759: 758: 757: 747:Jason A. Quest 719:Jason A. Quest 700:Jason A. Quest 689: 686: 654: 645: 642: 639: 638: 635: 634: 631: 630: 627: 626: 623: 622: 620: 619: 618: 617: 608: 592: 578: 565: 547: 532: 530: 529: 518: 517: 512: 507: 502: 496: 493: 492: 484: 483: 476: 470: 469: 467: 450:the discussion 436: 424: 423: 418: 406: 405: 402: 401: 398: 397: 388: 378: 377: 368: 358: 357: 355: 353: 347: 346: 334: 333: 326:Low-importance 322: 316: 315: 313: 275:on Knowledge. 264: 263: 247: 235: 234: 232:Low‑importance 216: 204: 203: 200: 199: 196:Low-importance 186: 176: 175: 173: 139: 138: 122: 110: 109: 98: 86: 85: 79: 68: 54: 53: 49:this help page 33:poorly sourced 19: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1876: 1865: 1862: 1860: 1857: 1855: 1852: 1850: 1847: 1845: 1842: 1840: 1837: 1835: 1832: 1830: 1827: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1802: 1800: 1797: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1779: 1772: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1754: 1746: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1709: 1704: 1703:somebody else 1700: 1696: 1692: 1691: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1650: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1604: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1591: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1542: 1536: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1478: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1426: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1413: 1412: 1404: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1305: 1302: 1299: 1298: 1296: 1295:two different 1292: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1264: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1186: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1117: 1115: 1111: 1106: 1103: 1099: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1065: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1045: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1027: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1012: 1007: 998: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 972: 969: 966: 965: 963: 959: 955: 951: 947: 945: 941: 940: 939: 938: 935: 931: 927: 926:MontChevalier 924: 921: 918: 917: 916: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 898: 897:Nat King Cole 893: 889: 888: 887:Ronald Reagan 883: 882:Divine Miss M 879: 878: 873: 869: 868: 863: 859: 858: 849: 845: 841: 837: 832: 828: 824: 823: 822: 813: 809: 805: 801: 794: 792: 788: 784: 780: 779: 778: 774: 770: 766: 762: 756: 752: 748: 744: 743: 742: 738: 734: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 712: 711: 710: 709: 705: 701: 696: 687: 685: 683: 679: 675: 671: 664: 663: 659: 653: 616: 615: 610: 609: 606: 602: 599: 597: 593: 591: 587: 585: 584: 579: 577: 574: 572: 571: 566: 564: 560: 556: 554: 553: 548: 546: 543: 541: 540: 535: 534: 531: 527: 523: 522: 516: 513: 511: 508: 506: 503: 501: 498: 497: 495: 494: 490: 489: 485: 481: 475: 472: 471: 468: 451: 447: 443: 442: 437: 434: 430: 429: 425: 422: 419: 416: 412: 395: 394: 384: 380: 379: 375: 374: 364: 360: 359: 356: 354: 349: 348: 344: 339: 335: 331: 327: 321: 318: 317: 314: 297: 293: 289: 285: 284:current tasks 281: 279: 274: 270: 269: 261: 260:Comics portal 255: 250: 248: 245: 241: 240: 236: 229: 228:United States 225: 220: 217: 214: 210: 197: 194:(assessed as 193: 192: 182: 178: 177: 174: 157: 156:documentation 153: 149: 145: 144: 136: 125: 123: 120: 116: 115: 111: 107: 102: 99: 96: 92: 87: 83: 77: 69: 65: 60: 59: 51: 50: 45: 41: 37: 34: 30: 26: 25: 20: 18: 17: 1758: 1737:Grandpallama 1729:WP:ABOUTSELF 1724: 1702: 1698: 1653: 1637:Grandpallama 1633:WP:ABOUTSELF 1623: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1595:Grandpallama 1592: 1589: 1562: 1560:once said." 1543: 1540: 1500:Grandpallama 1457:Grandpallama 1427: 1424: 1420: 1417:Grandpallama 1414: 1408: 1369: 1365: 1350: 1330:Grandpallama 1294: 1287: 1283: 1265: 1243:Grandpallama 1230: 1203:Grandpallama 1196: 1192: 1189:lead section 1188: 1184: 1162: 1158: 1155:lead section 1154: 1150: 1136:Grandpallama 1118: 1113: 1110:Grandpallama 1107: 1102:MOS:LEADCITE 1100: 1097: 1046: 1031: 1010: 1005: 1002: 954:Uncle Miltie 949: 901: 895: 891: 885: 881: 877:Bette Midler 875: 871: 865: 862:Stan the Man 861: 855: 853: 819: 804:72.183.76.75 798:— Preceding 764: 715:this article 691: 674:72.183.76.74 668:— Preceding 665: 647: 611: 595: 594: 581: 580: 568: 567: 550: 549: 537: 536: 439: 391: 371: 325: 288:notice board 286:, visit the 278:Get involved 276: 266: 189: 141: 82:WikiProjects 47: 35: 28: 22: 1550:Zack Snyder 1080:Nightscream 867:Walt Disney 688:Controversy 343:work groups 72:Start-class 1778:Categories 1733:WP:PRIMARY 1629:WP:SELFPUB 1469:Thank you. 1293:Those are 1270:Comicsgate 1239:WP:NOTHERE 1235:Comicsgate 1197:right-wing 1163:right-wing 999:TV credits 892:The Gipper 872:Uncle Walt 836:Magic9Ball 783:Magic9Ball 769:4.16.26.19 733:惑乱 Wakuran 1762:3Kingdoms 1624:available 1554:Tommy Gun 1078:. et al. 612:See also 161:Biography 101:Biography 40:libellous 1558:Stan Lee 1473:section. 1241:nature. 1199:content. 1165:content. 1049:Psycho D 1035:Psycho D 1006:based on 979:edits. - 857:Stan Lee 825:We cite 800:unsigned 670:unsigned 651:Doczilla 341:Related 224:Creators 1693:As per 1282:called 1263:YouTube 1193:focused 1187:in the 1159:focused 1153:in the 902:outside 605:YouTube 505:history 328:on the 1725:solely 1496:WP:RSN 1453:WP:RSN 1355:WP:NOR 1074:, and 1072:WP:IRS 1068:WP:NOR 1013:job. - 831:verify 657:STOMP! 552:Expand 301:Comics 273:comics 219:Comics 78:scale. 1076:WP:CS 1011:their 977:WP:RS 596:Other 583:Stubs 570:Photo 515:purge 510:watch 1766:talk 1741:talk 1731:and 1715:talk 1679:talk 1641:talk 1612:talk 1521:talk 1504:talk 1485:talk 1461:talk 1434:talk 1381:talk 1334:talk 1320:talk 1247:talk 1221:talk 1207:talk 1174:talk 1140:talk 1125:talk 1084:talk 1064:WP:V 1053:talk 1039:talk 1019:talk 985:talk 962:talk 930:talk 910:talk 840:talk 808:talk 787:talk 773:talk 765:only 751:talk 737:talk 723:talk 704:talk 695:here 678:talk 590:here 563:here 559:here 500:edit 292:edit 150:and 1635:. 1195:on 1161:on 950:why 829:to 561:or 474:??? 320:Low 29:BLP 1780:: 1768:) 1743:) 1735:. 1717:) 1681:) 1673:-- 1654:is 1643:) 1614:) 1523:) 1506:) 1487:) 1463:) 1436:) 1383:) 1351:is 1336:) 1322:) 1249:) 1223:) 1209:) 1176:) 1149:a 1142:) 1127:) 1086:) 1070:, 1066:, 1055:) 1041:) 1021:) 987:) 964:) 932:) 912:) 884:, 874:, 864:, 842:) 810:) 789:) 775:) 753:) 739:) 725:) 706:) 680:) 351:/ 290:, 226:/ 222:: 198:). 104:: 1764:( 1739:( 1713:( 1677:( 1639:( 1610:( 1586:) 1582:( 1575:) 1571:( 1519:( 1502:( 1483:( 1459:( 1432:( 1379:( 1357:: 1332:( 1318:( 1245:( 1219:( 1205:( 1172:( 1138:( 1123:( 1082:( 1051:( 1037:( 1017:( 983:( 960:( 928:( 908:( 838:( 806:( 785:( 771:( 749:( 735:( 721:( 702:( 698:- 676:( 598:: 586:: 573:: 555:: 542:: 482:. 396:. 376:. 345:: 332:. 298:. 280:! 158:. 84:: 52:. 27:(

Index

biographies of living persons
poorly sourced
libellous
this noticeboard
this help page

content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
Arts and Entertainment
WikiProject icon
Biography portal
WikiProject Biography
join the project
contribute to the discussion
documentation
Taskforce icon
the arts and entertainment work group
Low-importance
WikiProject icon
Comics
Creators
United States
WikiProject icon
icon
Comics portal
WikiProject Comics
comics
Get involved

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.