793:). For example, the section "Normative ethics" has 12 subsections, many of which have themselves several subsubsections. A similar problem applies to the 12 subsubsection of the subsection "Particular fields of application". One way to address this issue would be to only include subsections for the most important topics and summarize the remaining subsections maybe to one paragraph each without a separate subsection. For example, the subsection "State consequentialism" could be included in the section "Consequentialism" rather than having a separate subsection. And the subsection "Intuitive ethics" talks about ethical intuitionism, which belongs to metaethics rather than normative ethics. Many of the subsubsections of "Particular fields of application" only have one or two sentences and it shouldn't be a problem to merge them into another section.
448:
634:
241:
606:
439:
274:
655:
1022:
376:
295:
211:
759:
739:
508:
481:
518:
860:
stating that ethics is about responding to reasons and his attempt to reconcile consequentialism and deontology. Rawls is a heavy-weight in political philosophy so the article should mention him somewhere. I'm not sure if it's best to discuss Parfit and Rawls in the history section or in another part of the article.
797:
discussed in the article but they can be addressed later. I was hoping to get some feedback on these ideas and possibly other suggestions. I still have to do some research to work out the details. After that, I would start implementing them one at a time but it will probably take a while to address all the points.
859:
I was thinking about mentioning Parfit but I'm not sure how to best include him in the history section. His discussions of personal identity were groundbreaking and have various implications for moral philosophy but they are not directly part of it. Maybe something about his rationalist moral realism
881:
For Rawls, history section might make sense, given that so huge subsequent literature responding to him, the direct legal impact and the revitalization of political philosophy that his work had. For Parfit, I think both of your suggestions would work well, or perhaps something about his inauguration
863:
You are right that in terms of the age of the branches and the reader's expectations, metaethics shouldn't come first. The main motivation for having it first is probably to go from abstract to concrete. Some sources follow this idea. Another approach would be to discuss metaethics after normative
940:. Do you think it would be good to put it in the introduction, and to move the image that is currently in the introduction into "Normative ethics"? Then, the image caption would replace the sentence "It is usually divided into three major fields: normative ethics, applied ethics, and metaethics."
796:
An important part that is missing in the current version is the history of ethics. I think it deserves its own section without going too much into detail, maybe one or two paragraphs per main period (ancient, medieval,...). Various smaller adjustments would be needed for the different topics
909:
I found a way to mention Parfit and Rawls in the history section. I haven't fully made up my mind about the section order and I would be interested to hear what others think. I'll keep my eyes open on how reliable sources deal with this issue as I do the research for the other sections.
886:. Contrasting Parfit with Bernard Williams on their opposing adherence to moral realism could be a natural way to include Williams as well (although I see he's in the definition section already, albeit in a rather general way, not particularly revealing of his contributions).
855:
and thanks for the feedback! I think it's a good proposal to focus on consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics in the section on normative ethics. My idea was to have one subsection for each together with one additional subsection called "Others" to discuss alternative
830:
Also, it seems a bit jarring to me that the first section of the article would be on metaethics, considering it is the youngest tradition of the three branches and definitely not the first thing people think of when they think of ethics (presumably that's normative ethics).
1034:
785:
I was thinking about implementing changes to this article with the hope of moving it in the direction of GA status. There is still a lot to do. Major parts lack references, there are many "citation needed" tags and one "Synthesis" tag.
826:
Considering that consequentialism, deontology and virtue ethics are the chief normative ethical approaches, it might be good to single them out, like how certain traditions were singled out in the
Philosophy article's history
1113:
1088:
1078:
975:
Although I don't know if the image itself really adds much information. It conveys a rather base level of information, which is already easily readable in the text (and perhaps more comprehensible there).
153:
1103:
748:
in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education
Program:California State University, Channel Islands/Ethics for a Free World (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
769:
958:
It's maybe not as informative as the current image, and it shows the subfields of ethics but without directly providing links. So, I'm actually not sure whether it would be an improvement or not.
1118:
889:
Your abstract to concrete idea makes sense, but the newness of metaethics + the oldness of normative makes it difficult to reconcilce that decision. But, per usual, I defer to your expertise.
280:
361:
255:
789:
At some points, the article has too much information: this type of overview article should mostly focus on general patterns and leave the details to more specific articles (see
539:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the
202:
815:
I think the history section could use one or two more sentences which go further into the 20th and 21st century. My suggestion would be an mentioning the introduction of
943:
However, I realize that descriptive ethics is less popular than the 3 other subfields of ethics. Do you think "Descriptive ethics" should be removed from the image?
717:
576:
147:
878:
The "Others" division makes sense to me—that's what I was getting at when I mentioned modeling this after your work on the philosophy article's history section.
79:
1098:
1153:
1128:
707:
566:
613:
491:
1158:
1108:
380:
683:
541:
397:
342:
85:
1138:
1073:
1148:
1123:
1083:
30:
1143:
662:
639:
531:
486:
452:
99:
1133:
104:
20:
1042:
1093:
765:
745:
74:
461:
44:
250:
65:
682:
related articles on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
168:
273:
210:
185:
135:
109:
1054:
937:
790:
221:
438:
240:
467:
260:
1025:
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki
Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between
55:
390:
198:
194:
190:
129:
70:
1050:
1038:
264:
375:
294:
161:
125:
1001:
963:
948:
226:
915:
883:
869:
816:
802:
523:
175:
51:
654:
633:
223:
984:
897:
839:
323:
605:
1067:
997:
959:
944:
675:
671:
141:
911:
865:
823:
and something perhaps something from Rawls—two huge figures who seem to be missing.
798:
972:
Well to reflect the article, descriptive ethics would indeed make sense removing.
1021:
979:
892:
852:
834:
679:
536:
513:
758:
738:
384:
667:
535:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
820:
408:
24:
507:
480:
225:
1114:
Knowledge (XXG) level-2 vital articles in
Philosophy and religion
1089:
Knowledge (XXG) Did you know articles that are featured articles
753:
733:
432:
227:
15:
1058:
1005:
991:
967:
952:
919:
904:
873:
846:
806:
604:
279:
This article will appear on
Knowledge (XXG)'s Main Page as
1104:
Knowledge (XXG) vital articles in
Philosophy and religion
1079:
Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page
1016:
Wiki
Education assignment: Legal Environment of Business
354:
335:
316:
160:
666:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
587:
174:
1119:FA-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
412:theorists believe that all moral claims are false?
33:for general discussion of the article's subject.
996:Actually, I tend agree with you. No problem.
8:
768:in Fall 2016. Further details are available
545:about philosophy content on Knowledge (XXG).
263:. Even so, if you can update or improve it,
259:as one of the best articles produced by the
253:; it (or a previous version of it) has been
628:
584:
475:
288:
235:
436:
630:
477:
1099:Knowledge (XXG) level-2 vital articles
692:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Skepticism
551:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Philosophy
7:
660:This article is within the scope of
529:This article is within the scope of
764:This article was the subject of an
744:This article was the subject of an
466:It is of interest to the following
23:for discussing improvements to the
1154:Mid-importance Skepticism articles
1129:Top-importance Philosophy articles
1030:
1026:
14:
1074:Knowledge (XXG) featured articles
812:Your progress looks great so far!
50:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome!
1033:. Further details are available
1020:
757:
737:
653:
632:
516:
506:
479:
446:
437:
374:
293:
272:
239:
209:
45:Click here to start a new topic.
1159:WikiProject Skepticism articles
1109:FA-Class level-2 vital articles
712:This article has been rated as
695:Template:WikiProject Skepticism
571:This article has been rated as
554:Template:WikiProject Philosophy
1139:Top-importance ethics articles
1059:01:42, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
383:appeared on Knowledge (XXG)'s
1:
1049:— Assignment last updated by
920:09:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
905:23:33, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
874:13:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
847:09:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
807:08:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
686:and see a list of open tasks.
42:Put new text under old text.
1149:FA-Class Skepticism articles
1124:FA-Class Philosophy articles
1084:Old requests for peer review
406:Did you know ... that some
404:The text of the entry was:
1175:
1144:Ethics task force articles
1006:02:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
992:02:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
968:00:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
953:23:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
718:project's importance scale
577:project's importance scale
362:Featured article candidate
711:
648:
612:
583:
570:
501:
474:
419:
371:
291:
287:
261:Knowledge (XXG) community
80:Be welcoming to newcomers
1134:FA-Class ethics articles
281:Today's featured article
1094:FA-Class vital articles
588:Associated task forces:
781:Changes to the article
766:educational assignment
746:educational assignment
663:WikiProject Skepticism
609:
532:WikiProject Philosophy
381:fact from this article
283:on September 27, 2024.
75:avoid personal attacks
1037:. Student editor(s):
608:
460:on Knowledge (XXG)'s
453:level-2 vital article
203:Auto-archiving period
100:Neutral point of view
938:this image on ethics
864:and applied ethics.
324:Good article nominee
105:No original research
936:Hi. I have created
698:Skepticism articles
557:Philosophy articles
1035:on the course page
770:on the course page
610:
542:general discussion
462:content assessment
299:Article milestones
86:dispute resolution
47:
884:population ethics
817:Personal identity
776:
775:
752:
751:
732:
731:
728:
727:
724:
723:
627:
626:
623:
622:
619:
618:
524:Philosophy portal
431:
430:
427:
426:
234:
233:
66:Assume good faith
43:
1166:
1061:
1043:article contribs
1032:
1031:20 December 2024
1028:
1024:
989:
987:
982:
902:
900:
895:
844:
842:
837:
761:
754:
741:
734:
700:
699:
696:
693:
690:
657:
650:
649:
644:
636:
629:
595:
585:
559:
558:
555:
552:
549:
526:
521:
520:
519:
510:
503:
502:
497:
494:
483:
476:
459:
450:
449:
442:
441:
433:
422:Featured article
420:Current status:
378:
357:
338:
319:
298:
297:
289:
276:
251:featured article
243:
236:
228:
214:
213:
204:
179:
178:
164:
95:Article policies
16:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1064:
1063:
1051:Cinnamonlover69
1048:
1039:Cinnamonlover69
1018:
985:
980:
978:
934:
898:
893:
891:
840:
835:
833:
791:WP:SUMMARYSTYLE
783:
697:
694:
691:
688:
687:
642:
593:
556:
553:
550:
547:
546:
522:
517:
515:
495:
489:
457:
447:
415:
414:
402:
353:
334:
315:
292:
230:
229:
224:
201:
121:
116:
115:
114:
91:
61:
12:
11:
5:
1172:
1170:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1091:
1086:
1081:
1076:
1066:
1065:
1027:19 August 2024
1017:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
973:
933:
930:
929:
928:
927:
926:
925:
924:
923:
922:
887:
879:
861:
857:
828:
824:
813:
782:
779:
774:
773:
762:
750:
749:
742:
730:
729:
726:
725:
722:
721:
714:Mid-importance
710:
704:
703:
701:
684:the discussion
658:
646:
645:
643:Mid‑importance
637:
625:
624:
621:
620:
617:
616:
611:
601:
600:
598:
596:
590:
589:
581:
580:
573:Top-importance
569:
563:
562:
560:
528:
527:
511:
499:
498:
496:Top‑importance
484:
472:
471:
465:
443:
429:
428:
425:
424:
417:
416:
403:
398:April 10, 2024
373:
372:
369:
368:
365:
358:
355:August 3, 2024
350:
349:
346:
339:
331:
330:
327:
320:
317:March 10, 2024
312:
311:
308:
305:
301:
300:
285:
284:
277:
269:
268:
244:
232:
231:
222:
220:
219:
216:
215:
181:
180:
118:
117:
113:
112:
107:
102:
93:
92:
90:
89:
82:
77:
68:
62:
60:
59:
48:
39:
38:
35:
34:
28:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1171:
1160:
1157:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1147:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1130:
1127:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1087:
1085:
1082:
1080:
1077:
1075:
1072:
1071:
1069:
1062:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1046:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1023:
1015:
1007:
1003:
999:
995:
994:
993:
990:
988:
983:
974:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
956:
955:
954:
950:
946:
941:
939:
931:
921:
917:
913:
908:
907:
906:
903:
901:
896:
888:
885:
880:
877:
876:
875:
871:
867:
862:
858:
854:
850:
849:
848:
845:
843:
838:
829:
825:
822:
818:
814:
811:
810:
809:
808:
804:
800:
794:
792:
787:
780:
778:
771:
767:
763:
760:
756:
755:
747:
743:
740:
736:
735:
719:
715:
709:
706:
705:
702:
685:
681:
677:
676:pseudohistory
673:
672:pseudoscience
669:
665:
664:
659:
656:
652:
651:
647:
641:
638:
635:
631:
615:
607:
603:
602:
599:
597:
592:
591:
586:
582:
578:
574:
568:
565:
564:
561:
544:
543:
538:
534:
533:
525:
514:
512:
509:
505:
504:
500:
493:
488:
485:
482:
478:
473:
469:
463:
455:
454:
444:
440:
435:
434:
423:
418:
413:
411:
410:
400:
399:
394:
392:
391:Did you know?
386:
382:
377:
370:
366:
364:
363:
359:
356:
352:
351:
347:
345:
344:
340:
337:
336:June 14, 2024
333:
332:
328:
326:
325:
321:
318:
314:
313:
309:
306:
303:
302:
296:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
252:
248:
245:
242:
238:
237:
218:
217:
212:
208:
200:
196:
192:
189:
187:
183:
182:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
120:
119:
111:
110:Verifiability
108:
106:
103:
101:
98:
97:
96:
87:
83:
81:
78:
76:
72:
69:
67:
64:
63:
57:
53:
52:Learn to edit
49:
46:
41:
40:
37:
36:
32:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1047:
1019:
977:
942:
935:
890:
832:
795:
788:
784:
777:
713:
661:
572:
540:
530:
468:WikiProjects
451:
421:
407:
405:
396:
388:
360:
341:
322:
265:please do so
254:
246:
206:
184:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
94:
19:This is the
343:Peer review
148:free images
31:not a forum
1068:Categories
689:Skepticism
680:skepticism
640:Skepticism
548:Philosophy
537:philosophy
487:Philosophy
395:column on
256:identified
856:theories.
456:is rated
385:Main Page
88:if needed
71:Be polite
21:talk page
998:Alenoach
960:Alenoach
945:Alenoach
827:section.
458:FA-class
367:Promoted
348:Reviewed
207:365Â days
186:Archives
56:get help
29:This is
27:article.
912:Phlsph7
866:Phlsph7
799:Phlsph7
716:on the
668:science
575:on the
409:ethical
387:in the
307:Process
154:WPÂ refs
142:scholar
986:(talk)
932:Images
899:(talk)
851:Hello
841:(talk)
821:Parfit
614:Ethics
492:Ethics
464:scale.
329:Listed
310:Result
247:Ethics
126:Google
25:Ethics
981:Aza24
894:Aza24
853:Aza24
836:Aza24
445:This
249:is a
169:JSTOR
130:books
84:Seek
1055:talk
1029:and
1002:talk
964:talk
949:talk
916:talk
870:talk
819:via
803:talk
678:and
304:Date
162:FENS
136:news
73:and
1045:).
882:of
708:Mid
567:Top
176:TWL
1070::
1057:)
1004:)
966:)
951:)
918:)
872:)
805:)
674:,
670:,
594:/
490::
379:A
205::
197:,
193:,
156:)
54:;
1053:(
1041:(
1000:(
962:(
947:(
914:(
868:(
801:(
772:.
720:.
579:.
470::
401:.
393:"
389:"
267:.
199:3
195:2
191:1
188::
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
58:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
