104:? Than Euclidean subspaces are, in fact, affine subspaces? That all equations need a non-zero right side? The article teaches some stuff related to linear subspaces, not really important things one should say about Euclidean subspaces. I’ll fix all these abominations soon.
148:
article, so I do not see any sense in the proposed change of title. You are not in a position to impose your vision what the article is about upon other editors. If the community decides that the article should be changed, I’ll change the entire article.
119:
This is an article about linear subspaces about R^n. If you disagree with the title, then propose a title change (rather than changing the entire article).. Only if you have sources that disagree with this title, of course.
196:
and contradicts the common usage of mathematicians: The whole article is written as if an
Euclidean space were a vector space and had a natural origin. This is wrong, as pointed out in the last paragraph of
292:
or so, and then merge (or not) to linear subspace? Create a new article about true
Euclidean subspaces, under the freed title or some another one? Just ignore the problem and leave all the crap at rest?
178:.. then you could create a new article about affine subspaces, if you wish. But changing the scope of this article and then rewriting the whole thing does not seem to be a good use of time.
279:
subspaces proper (such as a definition of angle between two such subspaces, or one of distance between a subspace and a point, at least there is no such content under the correct title
31:
I haven't yet linked to this article from anywhere else. I'm planning to go through the links to the linear subspace article and determine which ones ought to go here.
289:
89:
79:
320:
183:
125:
28:. Now that it's done, I think it makes a nice summary article for a wide swath of elementary linear algebra.
20:, and I found that the material naturally bifurcates (at least in my mind) into things having to do with
316:
298:
265:
239:
179:
154:
121:
109:
59:
209:(there is nothing in the article that depends on the basis field), and the title must be redirected to
192:
It is not a question of someone's "vision". The point is that the article uses a terminology which is
261:
218:
172:
You are not in a position to impose your vision what the article is about upon other editors.
294:
235:
150:
105:
55:
312:
308:
276:
254:
231:
227:
210:
206:
198:
175:
145:
97:
84:
17:
24:
and things having to do with general vector spaces. This is the part about subspaces of
214:
41:
32:
269:
193:
101:
50:
Thanks for this last message. Now it will be easier for us to cleanse consequences
324:
302:
243:
222:
187:
158:
129:
113:
96:
and all the article pursues this heresy. Why could authors not realize that
63:
44:
35:
54:
given we know who and when injected this non-standard term into
Knowledge.
174:
Hmm.. likewise? I would be in favour of merging this article into
272:, as I can see (ignoring the second issue that it is a misnomer)
76:
307:
As I said, I would be in favour of merging this article into
51:
230:… good point! I did not notice this article. I go to
40:
I've now updated some of the links from other pages.
311:. And as D.Lazard said, redirecting the title to
138:There is nothing special in linear subspaces in
288:, Mark M, propose? Move the present article to
144:which cannot (or should not) be covered by the
8:
264:article describes linear subspaces in the
257:article is severely short of useful stuff
268:, which have not anything specific to
7:
290:linear subspaces of the real n-space
199:Euclidean space#intuitive overview
14:
275:There is no useful content about
250:Let’s consider what we have now:
83:a Euclidean subspace is simply a
70:The article is completely wrong
16:I was working on a revision of
315:seems to make the most sense.
45:21:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
36:09:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
234:now and change links to it.
349:
325:18:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
303:10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
244:10:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
223:10:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
188:09:48, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
159:08:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
130:07:41, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
114:06:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
64:20:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
74:The article’s lead says
100:is a special case of an
266:real coordinate space
87:of a Euclidean space
262:Euclidean subspace
201:. IMO the article
94:
93:
340:
143:
77:
348:
347:
343:
342:
341:
339:
338:
337:
313:Flat (geometry)
309:linear subspace
255:linear subspace
232:Euclidean space
228:Flat (geometry)
211:flat (geometry)
207:linear subspace
205:be merged into
176:linear subspace
146:linear subspace
139:
98:Euclidean space
85:linear subspace
72:
18:linear subspace
12:
11:
5:
346:
344:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
282:
281:
280:
273:
258:
248:
247:
246:
164:
163:
162:
161:
133:
132:
92:
91:
88:
81:
71:
68:
67:
66:
52:of these edits
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
345:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
291:
287:
283:
278:
274:
271:
267:
263:
259:
256:
252:
251:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
195:
191:
190:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
160:
156:
152:
147:
142:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
123:
118:
117:
116:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
86:
82:
78:
75:
69:
65:
61:
57:
53:
49:
48:
47:
46:
43:
38:
37:
34:
29:
27:
23:
19:
285:
270:real numbers
202:
171:
140:
102:affine space
95:
73:
39:
30:
25:
21:
15:
295:Incnis Mrsi
236:Incnis Mrsi
151:Incnis Mrsi
106:Incnis Mrsi
56:Incnis Mrsi
277:Euclidean
284:What do
215:D.Lazard
317:Mark M
180:Mark M
122:Mark M
194:WP:OR
321:talk
299:talk
260:The
253:The
240:talk
219:talk
203:must
184:talk
155:talk
126:talk
110:talk
60:talk
286:you
42:Jim
33:Jim
323:)
301:)
242:)
221:)
213:.
186:)
157:)
128:)
112:)
90:”
80:“
62:)
319:(
297:(
238:(
217:(
182:(
153:(
141:R
124:(
108:(
58:(
26:R
22:R
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.