Knowledge

Talk:Eugene Hlywa

Source 📝

162: 141: 71: 53: 22: 398:
and friends both in Australia and internationally. He was very proud of these 5 articles and I and others personally can recommend them as a maor part of Eugene's contribution to humanity. Please could you advise me how to keep these articles in his major publications list or in the references list as to delete them would be unfair and a huge loss to the late Dr Eugene's work.
172: 81: 397:
These recent 5 articles published by Eugene Hlywa were significant contributions to his major theories on hypnosis, spirituality and psychotherapy. They are the only 5 peer reviewed English articles he published in Australia in the decade before he died. Eugene was respected by many of his colleagues
422:
people with a reputition in the area (meaning that opinions of equally nonnotable peopoe, such as a Serhii Boltivets do not count). Google search for the name ""Eugene Hlywa" gives very few references. Therefore I do not think his contributions to science was significant, and his articles have
413:
Sorry, Knowledge cannot be responsible to any loss of anybody's work. If his work is notable, then it must be recognized as such be his peers' community. There is no problem to have a list of books, because there is little doubt about their individual importance for person's work. As for
329:. Importance is decided by peer opinion, not by Wikipedian's opinion. If some reliable refs say "this or that article was groundbreaking in ..." or something similar, then of course it makes sense to list it as an important work. Otherwise it is 253:, is there a reason you keep removing the list of journal publications? It happened in 2017 and again recently. I have been asked about it off-wiki and (obviously) do not know your motivations. 427:
By the way, please provide detailed references to all information in the article, so that it can be verified. Unreferenced text may be deleted at any time. See our policies,
418:. These are covered in the sections typically titled "Research", "Work", "Contributions to...", etc., which are written basing on reliable references to opinions of 477: 228: 218: 482: 472: 467: 462: 99: 194: 300: 103: 107: 98:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 185: 146: 368: 94: 58: 33: 21: 350:
Now, the question to the ones who wants to add this list: What are your criteria to chose these 5 articles?
333:. On the other hand, if a certain publication is of recognized importance, it must covered in the bio, no? 444: 380: 372: 287: 273: 39: 440: 403: 376: 296: 283: 269: 250: 193:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
399: 316: 258: 177: 367:
BTW, WPBIBLIO is a guideline for wikipedia articles which are bibliography lists, such as
330: 86: 432: 311:
someone does, but it seems like 5 journal articles won't break the metaphorical bank.
456: 312: 254: 436: 428: 161: 140: 70: 52: 190: 167: 76: 414:
publications, the importance of a person not his publications, but his
282:
Once again: we do not list published articles, peer-reviewed or not.
448: 407: 384: 320: 291: 277: 262: 106:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 15: 268:
In Knowledge, we do not list publications. We do list books.
423:
little impact. You are welcome to prove that I am mistaken.
307:
list publications; I can totally understand not publishing
189:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 325:the key words in the guideline you cited are 8: 19: 327:important to the topic of the bibliography 301:Knowledge:WikiProject_Bibliographies#Goals 135: 47: 137: 49: 326: 7: 183:This article is within the scope of 92:This article is within the scope of 38:It is of interest to the following 478:Low-importance psychology articles 299:, where does it say that? I found 14: 203:Knowledge:WikiProject Psychology 170: 160: 139: 79: 69: 51: 20: 483:WikiProject Psychology articles 473:Start-Class psychology articles 369:List of works by William Gibson 223:This article has been rated as 206:Template:WikiProject Psychology 116:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography 468:WikiProject Biography articles 463:Start-Class biography articles 119:Template:WikiProject Biography 1: 197:and see a list of open tasks. 104:contribute to the discussion 499: 416:contributions to knowledge 229:project's importance scale 222: 155: 64: 46: 449:17:04, 4 June 2019 (UTC) 408:06:38, 4 June 2019 (UTC) 385:19:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC) 321:13:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC) 303:which seems to imply we 292:20:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC) 278:15:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC) 263:14:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC) 186:WikiProject Psychology 28:This article is rated 373:Bibliography of India 95:WikiProject Biography 209:psychology articles 122:biography articles 34:content assessment 246:Publications list 243: 242: 239: 238: 235: 234: 178:Psychology portal 134: 133: 130: 129: 490: 211: 210: 207: 204: 201: 180: 175: 174: 173: 164: 157: 156: 151: 143: 136: 124: 123: 120: 117: 114: 100:join the project 89: 87:Biography portal 84: 83: 82: 73: 66: 65: 55: 48: 31: 25: 24: 16: 498: 497: 493: 492: 491: 489: 488: 487: 453: 452: 371:(by author) or 248: 208: 205: 202: 199: 198: 176: 171: 169: 149: 121: 118: 115: 112: 111: 85: 80: 78: 32:on Knowledge's 29: 12: 11: 5: 496: 494: 486: 485: 480: 475: 470: 465: 455: 454: 425: 424: 396: 394: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 388: 387: 375:(by subject). 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 247: 244: 241: 240: 237: 236: 233: 232: 225:Low-importance 221: 215: 214: 212: 195:the discussion 182: 181: 165: 153: 152: 150:Low‑importance 144: 132: 131: 128: 127: 125: 91: 90: 74: 62: 61: 56: 44: 43: 37: 26: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 495: 484: 481: 479: 476: 474: 471: 469: 466: 464: 461: 460: 458: 451: 450: 446: 442: 438: 434: 430: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 409: 405: 401: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 361: 360: 359: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 343: 342: 332: 328: 324: 323: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 298: 295: 294: 293: 289: 285: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 256: 252: 245: 230: 226: 220: 217: 216: 213: 196: 192: 188: 187: 179: 168: 166: 163: 159: 158: 154: 148: 145: 142: 138: 126: 109: 108:documentation 105: 101: 97: 96: 88: 77: 75: 72: 68: 67: 63: 60: 57: 54: 50: 45: 41: 35: 27: 23: 18: 17: 426: 419: 415: 395: 308: 304: 249: 224: 184: 93: 40:WikiProjects 441:Staszek Lem 377:Staszek Lem 297:Staszek Lem 284:Staszek Lem 270:Staszek Lem 251:Staszek Lem 30:Start-class 457:Categories 309:everything 200:Psychology 191:Psychology 147:Psychology 331:WP:TRIVIA 113:Biography 59:Biography 313:Primefac 255:Primefac 433:WP:CITE 227:on the 400:Awylhe 305:should 36:scale. 437:WP:RS 420:other 445:talk 429:WP:V 404:talk 381:talk 317:talk 288:talk 274:talk 259:talk 102:and 439:. 219:Low 459:: 447:) 435:, 431:, 406:) 383:) 319:) 290:) 276:) 261:) 443:( 402:( 379:( 315:( 286:( 272:( 257:( 231:. 110:. 42::

Index


content assessment
WikiProjects
WikiProject icon
Biography
WikiProject icon
Biography portal
WikiProject Biography
join the project
contribute to the discussion
documentation
WikiProject icon
Psychology
WikiProject icon
Psychology portal
WikiProject Psychology
Psychology
the discussion
Low
project's importance scale
Staszek Lem
Primefac
talk
14:06, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Staszek Lem
talk
15:57, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Staszek Lem
talk
20:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.