190:
130:
478:"blacklisting of tracks (so they don't get scanned into your library), downloading of guitar tablature from fretplay.com, the ability to submit played tracks on your iPod to Last.fm, support for burning tracks to audio CDs (with the ability to choose which application to use). Exaile also includes visualizations and equalizer, with pre-defined sets." - NONE of this is in 0.3.0. The EQ will return in 0.3.1, however.
103:
72:
21:
456:"aims to be similar ... Amarok." - While we originally billed Exaile this way, in truth Exaile has walked its own distinct path since fairly early 0.2.x. As of the 0.3.x series and the new amarok 2.x we are actively discouraging this phrasing, something like "inspired by amarok 1.x" should be used instead, or the amarok link dropped entirely.
249:
239:
218:
327:
510:
Reacocard, you clearly know a lot about this so I don't see a problem with you fixing the article yourself. You obviously understand that being on the Exaile team you need to be careful not to turn this article into one big advert, but there's no reason you shouldn't correct the inaccuracies you find
340:
This was deleted and later recreated in a different form, with different references. G4 excludes "pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies". As the deletion reason in the AFD was "Specific sources are not cited for
369:
It took a literal total of about 180 seconds to scan my library. Figuratively long enough for empires to rise and fall, civilizations to crumble. How to remedy this? There is no mention in the mailing list but yet google search results are populated with this unanswered problem. The single biggest
433:
While as a member of the Exaile team I probably shouldn't edit the page myself, I feel obligated to tell you how horrifically inaccurate this page is. Most of the text appears to be copied from old descriptions of 0.2.x, which are not fully applicable to the current series, 0.3.x, as Exaile was
444:
The "Operating system" category implies that we run on
Windows. While it is true that it is possible to run Exaile on Windows, doing so is very much unsupported and involves a lot of manual work to get it running, so I feel the label is inaccurate, or at the very least needs a better
492:
Really, while I appreciate the fact that
Knowledge is allowing the page to continue to exist, if noone is going to actually bother to keep it up to date then I would rather that it be removed so that users don't get a false impression of Exaile.
406:
I've read through the Afd policy now, and I see that it's not supposed to be a vote. Given the comments (and the clear evidence/citations that show this to be a notable project) I don't understand the reasons that
344:. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the
356:
Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely.
593:
41:
603:
588:
180:
170:
623:
598:
305:
295:
51:
583:
628:
146:
618:
412:
390:
512:
271:
608:
349:
199:
113:
613:
137:
108:
83:
345:
262:
223:
475:"built-in SHOUTcast directory" - in 0.3, this is a plugin, not built-in, so the word 'built-in' needs to be dropped.
448:
The development version is listed as 0.3.1. This is incorrect, the development version is 0.3.1b, b meaning beta.
27:
464:"artist/album information via Knowledge" has not yet been ported to 0.3.x and needs to be dropped from the list.
416:
394:
516:
71:
89:
337:
but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request on the basis that:
565:
467:"editing audio tags and set ratings" is very awkward wording, why not "advanced tag editing" instead?
20:
498:
270:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
145:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
411:
has closed the discussion with a result of 'Delete'. Surely 'Keep' has been justified here? -
561:
494:
577:
511:
IMO. I vote go for it, and let others tone down or remove anything that goes too far
334:
189:
408:
254:
560:. Anyone know why? Maybe a glitch? Maybe those are protected for security reason?
381:
Why is was the result of the discussion 'Delete'? The discussion clearly shows 3
129:
102:
244:
486:
Technically its gplv2 or later, but im not going to split hairs on this one.
30:. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
142:
326:
267:
248:
321:
238:
217:
65:
15:
569:
520:
502:
420:
398:
188:
266:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
141:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
348:(prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to
333:This article was tagged for speedy deletion under
594:Stub-Class software articles of Low-importance
370:issue and roadblock to mass market exposure.
335:section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion
8:
546:It needs to be update with the new link at
365:Crushingly long library scan / loadup time
212:
97:
69:
214:
99:
604:Unknown-importance Computing articles
552:I tried to fix this but somehow that
7:
260:This article is within the scope of
135:This article is within the scope of
88:It is of interest to the following
14:
437:Specific inaccuracies I noticed:
589:Low-importance software articles
532:Update "Repository" Link Infobox
341:retention." it no longer applies
325:
247:
237:
216:
128:
101:
70:
19:
352:(AfD) for debate on the merits.
300:This article has been rated as
175:This article has been rated as
26:This article was nominated for
434:completely rewritten for 0.3.
155:Knowledge:WikiProject Software
1:
624:Low-importance Linux articles
599:Stub-Class Computing articles
542:github.com/exaile-dev/exaile/
503:01:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
274:and see a list of open tasks.
197:This article is supported by
158:Template:WikiProject Software
149:and see a list of open tasks.
584:Stub-Class software articles
42:second nomination discussion
421:23:32, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
399:23:24, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
280:Knowledge:WikiProject Linux
52:first nomination discussion
645:
629:WikiProject Linux articles
570:01:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
306:project's importance scale
283:Template:WikiProject Linux
181:project's importance scale
619:Stub-Class Linux articles
346:proposed deletion process
299:
232:
196:
174:
123:
96:
548:github.com/exaile/exaile
536:The present link to the
521:23:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
50:, 25 January 2009, see
609:All Computing articles
556:is not showing in the
193:
78:This article is rated
614:All Software articles
350:articles for deletion
200:WikiProject Computing
192:
138:WikiProject Software
40:, 20 July 2011, see
194:
84:content assessment
389:. I'm confused. -
362:
361:
357:
320:
319:
316:
315:
312:
311:
263:WikiProject Linux
211:
210:
207:
206:
161:software articles
64:
63:
60:
59:
636:
549:
543:
377:Article deletion
355:
329:
322:
288:
287:
284:
281:
278:
257:
252:
251:
241:
234:
233:
228:
220:
213:
163:
162:
159:
156:
153:
132:
125:
124:
119:
116:
105:
98:
81:
75:
74:
66:
32:
31:
23:
16:
644:
643:
639:
638:
637:
635:
634:
633:
574:
573:
547:
541:
540:is outdated at
534:
431:
379:
367:
285:
282:
279:
276:
275:
253:
246:
226:
160:
157:
154:
151:
150:
117:
111:
82:on Knowledge's
79:
12:
11:
5:
642:
640:
632:
631:
626:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
591:
586:
576:
575:
533:
530:
528:
526:
525:
524:
523:
490:
489:
488:
487:
481:
480:
479:
476:
470:
469:
468:
465:
459:
458:
457:
451:
450:
449:
446:
430:
427:
426:
425:
424:
423:
378:
375:
373:
366:
363:
360:
359:
330:
318:
317:
314:
313:
310:
309:
302:Low-importance
298:
292:
291:
289:
286:Linux articles
272:the discussion
259:
258:
242:
230:
229:
227:Low‑importance
221:
209:
208:
205:
204:
195:
185:
184:
177:Low-importance
173:
167:
166:
164:
147:the discussion
133:
121:
120:
118:Low‑importance
106:
94:
93:
87:
76:
62:
61:
58:
57:
56:
55:
45:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
641:
630:
627:
625:
622:
620:
617:
615:
612:
610:
607:
605:
602:
600:
597:
595:
592:
590:
587:
585:
582:
581:
579:
572:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
550:
544:
539:
531:
529:
522:
518:
514:
509:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
500:
496:
485:
484:
483:paragraph 4:
482:
477:
474:
473:
472:paragraph 3:
471:
466:
463:
462:
461:paragraph 2:
460:
455:
454:
453:paragraph 1:
452:
447:
443:
442:
440:
439:
438:
435:
428:
422:
418:
414:
410:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
376:
374:
371:
364:
358:
353:
351:
347:
343:
342:
336:
331:
328:
324:
323:
307:
303:
297:
294:
293:
290:
273:
269:
265:
264:
256:
250:
245:
243:
240:
236:
235:
231:
225:
222:
219:
215:
202:
201:
191:
187:
186:
182:
178:
172:
169:
168:
165:
148:
144:
140:
139:
134:
131:
127:
126:
122:
115:
110:
107:
104:
100:
95:
91:
85:
77:
73:
68:
67:
53:
49:
46:
43:
39:
36:
35:
34:
33:
29:
25:
22:
18:
17:
557:
553:
551:
545:
537:
535:
527:
491:
445:description.
436:
432:
413:62.56.96.239
391:62.56.96.239
386:
382:
380:
372:
368:
354:
339:
338:
332:
301:
261:
255:Linux portal
198:
176:
136:
90:WikiProjects
47:
37:
513:62.56.96.44
578:Categories
562:Francewhoa
554:Repository
538:Repository
441:info box:
429:Inaccuracy
80:Stub-class
495:Reacocard
114:Computing
152:Software
143:software
109:Software
28:deletion
409:MBisanz
304:on the
179:on the
387:delete
86:scale.
48:Delete
385:vs 2
277:Linux
268:Linux
224:Linux
566:talk
558:Edit
517:talk
499:talk
417:talk
395:talk
383:keep
38:Keep
296:Low
171:Low
580::
568:)
519:)
501:)
419:)
397:)
112::
564:(
515:(
497:(
415:(
393:(
308:.
203:.
183:.
92::
54:.
44:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
