Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Exaile (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

311:. As I think these are the only significant sources currently on the page. Both appear to be reviews. In particular, I'll note that the title of the BrightHub review is perhaps a little misleading. Its title talks about "Awesomeness", however the review goes on to discuss the package in terms of "average". 212:
No reason for notability stated or found. Of the 5 links in the references section, at the time of writing, 4 return page not found errors. Of the sites they are sourced from, I'm not sure how many could be treated as independent and/or reliable. Reference #1 is the product's official site. Reference
262:
Given the apparent unnotability of the subject coupled with speed that tags have been removed in the past, I feel that AfD is probably going to be the best place to decide once and for all if a) it is notable and b) If it is, push those who insist it is notable into asserting that notability on the
181: 234:
request with an edit summary of "Which deletion discussion???" and added a single links as a demonstration of notability. The next day he appeared to change his mind and re-directed the article to
88: 142: 342:) from the previous AfD. By the way, the previous AfD is very dubious: the voting were in favor of keeping both argument- and number-wise, the closing note is puzzling. — 280: 175: 83: 461:
Just barely sufficient sourcing. Pages not being available are a problem, but if the reference was there once, it is probably re-findable.
304: 360: 17: 62: 380:, this contribution from the above IP came in the middle of a half hour long spate of edits that were almost all vandalism 308: 235: 472: 453: 406: 392: 368: 351: 320: 294: 272: 67: 53: 196: 439: 163: 115: 110: 491: 119: 40: 102: 487: 364: 216:
Searching on the Internet found only one or two mentions in sources that could be used as references.
157: 36: 255: 388: 316: 268: 189: 153: 445: 421: 402: 347: 60: 442: 420:: Exaile has been featured in a number of blogs focusing on open source software, for instance 377: 290: 203: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
486:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
449: 244: 231: 384: 381: 335: 312: 264: 468: 428: 398: 343: 331: 248: 57: 169: 286: 227: 136: 213:#2 appears to little beyond a package list for Ubuntu. #3 appears to be a blog. 106: 432: 339: 463: 435: 425: 254:
Article was tagged for notability in January 2011.The tag was removed by
241:
The article was restored for a second time by an anon user in August 2009
98: 73: 223:
It was previously deleted at AfD for the same reason on 1 Feb 2009.
480:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
258:
8 hours later with summary "notability well established"
219:
The article seems to have a chequered history at best:
132: 128: 124: 397:
I though it was a kind of sarcasm about my comment. —
188: 303:: For completeness I'll add web archive links to 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 494:). No further edits should be made to this page. 281:list of Software-related deletion discussions 202: 89:Articles for deletion/Exaile (2nd nomination) 8: 279:Note: This debate has been included in the 278: 444:. Clearly a notable piece of software. 330:: even with those references it passes 81: 226:Re-created less than 2 months later. 7: 359:i like this article i learned lots. 80: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 473:02:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 454:16:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC) 407:23:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 393:23:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 369:21:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 352:15:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 321:15:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 295:15:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 273:14:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 236:List of Linux audio software 84:Articles for deletion/Exaile 68:12:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC) 511: 483:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 338:. I added another ref ( 247:request was denied by 79:AfDs for this article: 399:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 344:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 48:The result was 297: 284: 54:non-admin closure 502: 485: 357:VERY STRONG KEEP 285: 256:User:Pantergraph 207: 206: 192: 140: 122: 34: 510: 509: 505: 504: 503: 501: 500: 499: 498: 492:deletion review 481: 251:in January 2010 149: 113: 97: 94: 77: 65: 64:about my edits? 58:Armbrust, B.Ed. 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 508: 506: 497: 496: 476: 475: 456: 414: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 354: 324: 323: 298: 260: 259: 252: 242: 239: 224: 210: 209: 146: 93: 92: 91: 86: 78: 76: 71: 63: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 507: 495: 493: 489: 484: 478: 477: 474: 470: 466: 465: 460: 457: 455: 451: 447: 443: 440: 437: 433: 430: 429:Linux Journal 426: 423: 419: 416: 415: 408: 404: 400: 396: 395: 394: 390: 386: 383: 379: 375: 372: 371: 370: 366: 362: 358: 355: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 326: 325: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 299: 296: 292: 288: 282: 277: 276: 275: 274: 270: 266: 257: 253: 250: 249:User:DESiegel 246: 243: 240: 237: 233: 229: 225: 222: 221: 220: 217: 214: 205: 201: 198: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 177: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 155: 152: 151:Find sources: 147: 144: 138: 134: 130: 126: 121: 117: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 95: 90: 87: 85: 82: 75: 72: 70: 69: 66: 61: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 482: 479: 462: 458: 441:, Unixmen - 417: 373: 356: 327: 300: 261: 228:User:Wwwwolf 218: 215: 211: 199: 193: 185: 178: 172: 166: 160: 150: 49: 47: 31: 28: 422:OMG! Ubuntu 376:: Ignoring 361:2.25.129.61 176:free images 385:Pit-yacker 378:WP:ILIKEIT 313:Pit-yacker 265:Pit-yacker 245:WP: CSD G6 488:talk page 340:Softpedia 287:• Gene93k 263:article. 232:WP:CSD G4 230:denied a 37:talk page 490:or in a 436:PC World 382:see here 336:WP:NSOFT 143:View log 39:or in a 182:WP refs 170:scholar 116:protect 111:history 446:Pewfly 332:WP:GNG 309:ref #5 154:Google 120:delete 99:Exaile 74:Exaile 469:talk 305:ref#4 197:JSTOR 158:books 137:views 129:watch 125:links 16:< 459:Keep 450:talk 418:Keep 403:talk 389:talk 374:Note 365:talk 348:talk 334:and 328:Keep 317:talk 307:and 291:talk 269:talk 190:FENS 164:news 133:logs 107:talk 103:edit 50:keep 464:DGG 301:Add 204:TWL 141:– ( 52:. ( 471:) 452:) 438:- 434:, 431:- 427:, 424:- 405:) 391:) 367:) 350:) 319:) 293:) 283:. 271:) 184:) 135:| 131:| 127:| 123:| 118:| 114:| 109:| 105:| 56:) 467:( 448:( 401:( 387:( 363:( 346:( 315:( 289:( 267:( 238:. 208:) 200:· 194:· 186:· 179:· 173:· 167:· 161:· 156:( 148:( 145:) 139:) 101:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
non-admin closure
Armbrust, B.Ed.

about my edits?
12:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Exaile
Articles for deletion/Exaile
Articles for deletion/Exaile (2nd nomination)
Exaile
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.