162:
592:, due to severe genetic problems, which means any new breed based on it, like Foldex is, will also not be permitted (absent proof that the genetic issues have been bred out, which is probably impossible in this case, because it is the gene that causes the ear-cartilage folding that also causes the skeletal problems at issue). The SF has also been legally banned in various jurisdictions for animal-welfare reasons. CFA and TICA both still accept SF, as does
22:
74:
53:
607:
of breeding experiments that people have put a name to. In this particular case, the experimental breed may be doomed due to heritable medical problems gotten from the
Scottish Fold. That said, the issues could in and of themselves generate enough (controversy-laden) coverage to confer notability, as
515:
is not a reliable source, it's just a personal blog of an amateur cat breeder and feral-cat tamer who doesn't have any particular qualifications, an "archive of cat-related articles, information and clip-art" that is a mixture of primary-source personal opinion and weak tertiary-source summarization
493:
Does the article itself even meet notability? No recognition from a major registry and very little citations on the article with most being about the
Scottish Fold. Messybeast just includes in a list and the other sites are just generic cat websites that have articles on as many breeds and
638:
I think it should be merged. Nothing noteworthy about the breed, if it generated controversy like the Ojos Azules as you mentioned it could merit an article but there isn't even a controversy about the breed - simply a lack of attention/recognition due to the
Scottish Fold ban.
502:
be additional sourcing available for this. It bears looking into. We need to beware of generic "internet cat sites" that simply cannibalize press-release-style material from breeders, and borrow (usually uncredited) from
Knowledge itself
572:; zero of them recognize a Foldex breed, even as provisional/experimental. I've checked. FIFe has nothing; same with CFA. TICA has been aware of Foldex since at least 2015 as a "breed" consisting of two individual cats
575:. The newest material they have that mentions it dates to 2021 and they have an internal code for it, but it is not among the "Championship Breeds" or "breeds accepted by the Board for Registration only"
552:, which recognizes and shows this breed along with 53 others, is a notable organization and event sponsor, with "its pedigrees and registrations accepted by major global associations such as the
367:, which recognizes and shows this breed along with 53 others, is a notable organization and event sponsor, with "its pedigrees and registrations accepted by major global associations such as the
293:
Messybeast just includes in a list and the other sites are just generic cat websites that have articles on as many breeds and unrecognised breeds as possible for engagement/advertising revenue.
527:
as an offshoot/crossbreed, but we need to avoid doing a duplicate section there. (I just cleaned up something like this the other day, where a bunch of experimental
Munchkin crossbreeds had
307:
If it isn't a recognized breed, then I'd argue for it to be merged or deleted. Btw, Traumnovelle, I've noticed your recent work and cat breeds, and thank you for it. Happy editing,
599:
Nascent breeds recognized by nothing but a single national-level or smaller organization (rarely independent of the breeders that comprise it) generally get merged to
290:
Does the article itself even meet notability? No recognition from a major registry and very little citations on the article with most being about the
Scottish Fold.
223:
539:, resolved by merging material to the latter and reducing the material in the former to a short list with sectional links to the material in the latter.)
561:
376:
722:
603:, but we'll have to see whether any further independent sourcing can be found. Most attempts to establish new breeds (of anything) fail, and
140:
130:
94:
102:
576:
207:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
727:
717:
690:
585:
467:
627:
557:
405:
372:
332:
262:
176:
98:
600:
536:
520:
704:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
425:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
33:
582:
553:
368:
232:
106:
81:
58:
220:
A merge discussion was started which renders this RM invalid. There's no action to be taken, from what I can see.
198:
168:
568:
That's a bit of an overstatement or a misunderstanding. CFA, TICA, and FIFe accept CCA registrations in breeds
549:
364:
21:
661:
312:
686:
644:
463:
298:
624:
593:
528:
508:
402:
329:
259:
228:
208:
39:
321:
A merge discussion is a separate kind of discussion (opened below). This one is just about the title.
589:
578:(whoTF taught them how to capitalize?), and it is not among their recognized and registerable breeds
384:
279:
211:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
657:
504:
308:
678:
640:
486:
481:
The RM above raised questions of whether this should remain a stand-alone article, or merge.
455:
294:
619:
573:
397:
324:
254:
543:
380:
584:. Further, Scottish Fold has been banned by FIFe and several other registries, including
275:
711:
674:
604:
524:
532:
611:
579:
242:
90:
596:
but only under stringent breeding control and repeat medical examination.
581:, nor is it included within their Scottish Fold definition as a variant
519:
If merged, it would be just as a summary expansion of the section at
172:
73:
52:
494:
unrecognised breeds as possible for engagement/advertising revenue.
694:
665:
648:
632:
471:
410:
388:
337:
316:
302:
283:
236:
156:
89:-related subjects on Knowledge. Please participate by editing
86:
15:
167:
On 28 January 2024, it was proposed that this article be
247:
523:. This experimental breed could also be mentioned at
444:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
454:the source article into the corresponding section.
85:. This project provides a central approach to
609:
447:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
8:
19:
197:The following is a closed discussion of a
47:
570:that those other organizations recognize
49:
547:
521:List of experimental cat breeds#Foldex
516:of other material (reliable and not).
492:
7:
438:The following discussion is closed.
216:The result of the move request was:
79:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
608:was the case with the now-extinct
14:
558:The International Cat Association
373:The International Cat Association
700:The discussion above is closed.
562:Fédération Internationale Féline
421:The discussion above is closed.
377:Fédération Internationale Féline
160:
72:
51:
20:
601:List of experimental cat breeds
537:List of experimental cat breeds
135:This article has been rated as
251:â Unnecessary disambiguation.
224:closed by non-admin page mover
190:Requested move 28 January 2024
1:
617:
395:
322:
267:03:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
252:
237:21:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
723:Mid-importance Cats articles
666:05:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
649:03:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
633:02:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
411:02:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
389:12:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
358:Neutral per discussion below
338:02:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
317:21:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
303:06:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
284:12:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
394:Comments in section below.
744:
695:16:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
472:13:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
141:project's importance scale
115:Knowledge:WikiProject Cats
728:WikiProject Cats articles
718:Start-Class Cats articles
554:Cat Fanciers' Association
369:Cat Fanciers' Association
134:
118:Template:WikiProject Cats
67:
46:
702:Please do not modify it.
550:Canadian Cat Association
441:Please do not modify it.
423:Please do not modify it.
365:Canadian Cat Association
204:Please do not modify it.
105:standards, or visit the
616:. Remains to be seen.
610:
511:). Speaking of which,
28:This article is rated
452:Consensus for merging
605:WP is not a database
362:nom< andK/s: -->
498:For Foldex, there
95:assess and improve
34:content assessment
531:sections both at
286:
227:
218:Procedural close.
187:
186:
155:
154:
151:
150:
147:
146:
109:for more details.
735:
683:
673:- Does not meet
631:
615:
490:
460:
443:
430:Merge discussion
409:
336:
268:
266:
250:
229:Vanderwaalforces
221:
206:
181:Procedural close
175:. The result of
164:
163:
157:
123:
122:
119:
116:
113:
107:wikiproject page
82:WikiProject Cats
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
743:
742:
738:
737:
736:
734:
733:
732:
708:
707:
706:
705:
679:
484:
479:
456:
439:
432:
427:
426:
246:
202:
192:
161:
120:
117:
114:
111:
110:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
741:
739:
731:
730:
725:
720:
710:
709:
699:
698:
697:
668:
651:
571:
529:WP:CONTENTFORK
509:WP:CITOGENESIS
501:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
434:
433:
431:
428:
420:
418:
416:
415:
414:
413:
363:cuteness. The
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
291:
240:
214:
213:
199:requested move
193:
191:
188:
185:
184:
177:the discussion
165:
153:
152:
149:
148:
145:
144:
137:Mid-importance
133:
127:
126:
124:
93:, and help us
77:
65:
64:
62:Midâimportance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
740:
729:
726:
724:
721:
719:
716:
715:
713:
703:
696:
692:
688:
684:
682:
676:
672:
669:
667:
663:
659:
658:SilverTiger12
656:merge, then.
655:
652:
650:
646:
642:
637:
636:
635:
634:
629:
626:
623:
622:
614:
613:
606:
602:
597:
595:
591:
587:
583:
580:
577:
574:
569:
566:
565:
563:
559:
555:
551:
545:
540:
538:
534:
530:
526:
525:Scottish Fold
522:
517:
514:
510:
506:
499:
496:
495:
488:
482:
473:
469:
465:
461:
459:
453:
450:
449:
448:
445:
442:
436:
435:
429:
424:
419:
412:
407:
404:
401:
400:
393:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
359:
356:
355:
351:
347:
346:
339:
334:
331:
328:
327:
320:
319:
318:
314:
310:
309:SilverTiger12
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
287:
285:
281:
277:
274:
273:
264:
261:
258:
257:
249:
244:
239:
238:
234:
230:
225:
219:
212:
210:
205:
200:
195:
194:
189:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
159:
158:
142:
138:
132:
129:
128:
125:
121:Cats articles
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
701:
681:Choucas Bleu
680:
670:
653:
641:Traumnovelle
620:
598:
567:
542:Also above,
541:
533:Munchkin cat
518:
512:
497:
491:says above:
487:Traumnovelle
483:
480:
458:Choucas Bleu
457:
451:
446:
440:
437:
422:
417:
398:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:
325:
295:Traumnovelle
271:
270:
255:
241:
217:
215:
203:
196:
180:
136:
97:articles to
80:
40:WikiProjects
621:SMcCandlish
612:Ojos Azules
513:Messy Beast
505:WP:CIRCULAR
399:SMcCandlish
326:SMcCandlish
276:â robertsky
256:SMcCandlish
209:move review
91:the article
30:Start-class
712:Categories
544:Randy Kryn
381:Randy Kryn
272:Relisting.
243:Foldex cat
360:and per
671:Support
654:Support
535:and at
350:Support
139:on the
675:WP:GNG
560:, and
546:says:
375:, and
248:Foldex
173:Foldex
36:scale.
500:might
169:moved
662:talk
645:talk
594:NZCF
588:and
586:GCCF
548:The
385:talk
354:Keep
352:and
313:talk
299:talk
280:talk
233:talk
179:was
112:Cats
101:and
99:good
59:Cats
630:đŒ
590:WCF
408:đŒ
379:".
335:đŒ
265:đŒ
171:to
131:Mid
103:1.0
87:Cat
714::
693:)
677:.
664:)
647:)
618:â
564:".
556:,
507:,
470:)
396:â
387:)
371:,
323:â
315:)
301:)
282:)
269:â
253:â
245:â
235:)
201:.
691:C
689:·
687:T
685:(
660:(
643:(
628:Âą
625:â
503:(
489::
485:@
468:C
466:·
464:T
462:(
406:Âą
403:â
383:(
333:Âą
330:â
311:(
297:(
278:(
263:Âą
260:â
231:(
226:)
222:(
183:.
143:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
