176:. There is a lot of work done in that article so I hope you will agree on editing it instead of completely ignoring it. Please note that license to use the image in the article is granted by MindGems and confirmed by Knowledge editor. The article is updated with extra references that are newer than the review in PCWorld. Please note that the things for speed and missing stuff from that outdated article are already fixed or implemented in the version 2.9.0.0 of the tool while the article relates to version 1.2.0.0. The revised article that I have uploaded is written in an objective way without leaning towards promotion of any kind. Even though the quotation that you have added from PCWorl about the tool being "cumbersome" is not longer valid I have merged it in the article. If you think something should be revised please feel free to do it.
140:
406:
relevant and if I wanted to hide something I would not use my name as a user name. You could find some more links to fill with SPAM here ;) I am ending this conversation - people like you should not be allowed to edit
Knowledge...if you wanted to contribute something you could edit the page instead of wasting your time with such nonsense arguments, but of course your "contribution is to DELETE and then add spam links.
80:
53:
22:
433:
Allan, I can see that you're upset. Please don't be. I don't think I saved anything other than what I feel is promotional text from being inserted in the article. While assuming that you were trying to hide would imply that I thought you were dumb enough to use your own name (I don't think you're
405:
Impressive...you saved the world by deleting a well designed page and replacing it with almost empty page with outdated references and incorrect information! Congratulations! It was clearly explained to you that there is nothing promotional in the page and whether I am related with MindGems is not
385:
That's what I have so far. I can keep going if needed anyone is still unconvinced. You're obviously linked to the company and from what I've seen of your edit history, your only goal here is to promote FolderSize on
Knowledge. So, I'm sorry if I removing something that something that I feel is
467:
Please don't take the DRV as carte blanch to use this article as a vehicle for advertising. I made it clear in the close that a balanced article was required and even edited the article to start this process off. You then went ahead and reverted me to made the article more advertorial. Well, bad
220:
Since Allan isn't responding, I'll copy/paste my response: "As I mentioned on your talk page immediately after I reverted your addition, you clearly have a conflict of interest here. I reverted your edit instead of marking the page indicating that an editor working on the page has a conflict of
320:
Not only did I nominate it for deletion before, I have read the deletion review. I mean and meant no disrespect to you when I felt and feel that I am doing what's best for
Knowledge by following its policies and guidelines. I'll stop beating around the bush about your COI, though. Here's the
263:
No, I won't restore it until we get some things straightened out. First, I disagree. I'll regurgitate the example I already gave regarding an entire section about editions of the software - it's not needed. It seems that just about everything you've done here so far is to promote a product.
477:
Sorry guys I tried to provide a better unbiased article. I have not restored the original the way it was and I also merged the new stuff from you. It seems to me that you have a bit too negative attitude here while I was trying to help. If you think that I can contribute let me know
468:
luck. We don't do advertorial and if you insist on forcing it in there will be two outcomes - firstly you will get blocked and secondly someone will nominate this barely notable article for deletion and given the problems keeping this clear I'd not be surprised of it gets deleted.
292:. A user like you deleted this on the first place and was asked to apologize for his words and actions. I have no time to waste with another user like that - you. If you do not like a section then edit/review it, but do not spit on the work of others by completely deleting it!
441:
You may end this conversation if you want, obviously, but that doesn't help you or
Knowledge. I'd be happy to edit the page with you but like I told you before, I wanted to get this COI issue out of the way first. I don't feel that my argument is nonsense
437:
I'm confused about your comment about "finding links to fill with SPAM here". There are whole teams of people and bots that search for spam links. In fact, they're the same ones that warned you on your talk page several times a few years
221:
interest. Also, several additions aren't needed and are down right advertorial, such as the section on free editions. Totally unneeded. If you wish to discuss this issue, please do so on the talk page of the article."
545:
445:
I suggest taking a little time to let this go then coming back. I'd be happy to help you but I'm not going to lay down while anyone adds what I feel is an advertising to
Knowledge.
249:
that there is nothing wrong with this article and it is not promotional nor it contains any from of spam. Please read the deletion log carefully and undo my changes. Thank you!
555:
289:
242:
509:
338:
540:
130:
120:
550:
334:
535:
96:
349:
560:
422:
308:
149:
63:
565:
245:
that this page should be restored and it shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. There was also clear explanation by
87:
58:
361:
517:
353:
33:
368:
434:
dumb), I can't help but notice that you repeatedly ignored my request that you declare your conflict of interest.
498:
The following
Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
513:
502:
21:
39:
456:
410:
397:
296:
279:
246:
232:
213:
193:
189:
483:
418:
304:
254:
181:
95:
on
Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
357:
172:
Hello, I merged your changes to the updated version of the article that I had in my sandbox:
447:
388:
270:
223:
204:
479:
414:
300:
250:
177:
529:
494:
A Commons file used on this page or its
Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
265:
139:
469:
365:
Removed link to
ProgrammersHeaven comment as the website is apparently blacklisted.
202:
Strange explanation? Maybe you can share with us what you find strange about it.
379:
79:
52:
173:
330:
198:
Please restore this article and apply modifications if needed. Thank you.
92:
521:
487:
472:
458:
426:
399:
312:
281:
258:
234:
215:
185:
15:
138:
325:
Press releases for FolderSize or MindGems by "Allan Cass"
288:
It sounds like you have not read the deletion review
194:
User_talk:OlYeller21#Why_did_you_undo_the_changes.3F
91:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
546:Stub-Class software articles of Low-importance
508:Participate in the deletion discussion at the
344:Advertorial forum comments made by "Allancass"
268:or should I point it out to everyone for you?
290:Knowledge:Deletion_review/Log/2013_January_28
243:Knowledge:Deletion_review/Log/2013_January_28
8:
241:There was a consensus in the deletion log:
47:
19:
321:information I found in a quick search.
49:
556:Unknown-importance Computing articles
380:Technorati Blog claimed by Allan Cass
7:
264:Second, can you please declare your
85:This article is within the scope of
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
541:Low-importance software articles
78:
51:
20:
188:My last revision was undone by
125:This article has been rated as
386:advertorial and you disagree.
192:with the strange explanation:
105:Knowledge:WikiProject Software
1:
551:Stub-Class Computing articles
488:21:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
147:This article is supported by
108:Template:WikiProject Software
99:and see a list of open tasks.
536:Stub-Class software articles
473:03:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
459:23:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
427:23:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
400:23:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
313:23:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
282:22:54, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
259:22:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
235:22:32, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
216:22:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
186:21:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
582:
522:15:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
131:project's importance scale
146:
124:
73:
46:
168:Updated FolderSize Page
561:All Computing articles
143:
28:This article is rated
566:All Software articles
150:WikiProject Computing
142:
266:conflict of interest
190:User_talk:OlYeller21
88:WikiProject Software
514:Community Tech bot
144:
34:content assessment
430:
413:comment added by
316:
299:comment added by
165:
164:
161:
160:
157:
156:
111:software articles
573:
453:
452:
429:
407:
394:
393:
315:
293:
276:
275:
229:
228:
210:
209:
113:
112:
109:
106:
103:
82:
75:
74:
69:
66:
55:
48:
31:
25:
24:
16:
581:
580:
576:
575:
574:
572:
571:
570:
526:
525:
510:nomination page
503:Folder Size.png
496:
450:
448:
408:
391:
389:
294:
273:
271:
226:
224:
207:
205:
170:
110:
107:
104:
101:
100:
67:
61:
32:on Knowledge's
29:
12:
11:
5:
579:
577:
569:
568:
563:
558:
553:
548:
543:
538:
528:
527:
506:
505:
495:
492:
491:
490:
475:
464:
463:
462:
461:
443:
439:
435:
383:
382:
371:
370:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
341:
340:
336:
332:
318:
317:
286:
285:
284:
239:
238:
237:
169:
166:
163:
162:
159:
158:
155:
154:
145:
135:
134:
127:Low-importance
123:
117:
116:
114:
97:the discussion
83:
71:
70:
68:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
578:
567:
564:
562:
559:
557:
554:
552:
549:
547:
544:
542:
539:
537:
534:
533:
531:
524:
523:
519:
515:
511:
504:
501:
500:
499:
493:
489:
485:
481:
476:
474:
471:
466:
465:
460:
457:
455:
454:
444:
440:
436:
432:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
396:
395:
381:
378:
377:
376:
375:
369:
367:
364:
362:
360:
358:
356:
354:
352:
350:
348:
347:
346:
345:
339:
337:
335:
333:
331:
329:
328:
327:
326:
322:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
291:
287:
283:
280:
278:
277:
267:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
231:
230:
219:
218:
217:
214:
212:
211:
201:
200:
199:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
167:
152:
151:
141:
137:
136:
132:
128:
122:
119:
118:
115:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
77:
76:
72:
65:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
27:
23:
18:
17:
507:
497:
446:
409:— Preceding
387:
384:
373:
372:
343:
342:
324:
323:
319:
295:— Preceding
269:
222:
203:
197:
171:
148:
126:
86:
40:WikiProjects
530:Categories
247:S Marshall
174:FolderSize
30:Stub-class
480:Allancass
415:Allancass
301:Allancass
251:Allancass
178:Allancass
64:Computing
451:Yeller21
423:contribs
411:unsigned
392:Yeller21
309:contribs
297:unsigned
274:Yeller21
227:Yeller21
208:Yeller21
102:Software
93:software
59:Software
470:Spartaz
442:either.
129:on the
36:scale.
374:Other
518:talk
484:talk
438:ago.
419:talk
305:talk
255:talk
182:talk
512:. —
121:Low
532::
520:)
486:)
449:Ol
425:)
421:•
390:Ol
311:)
307:•
272:Ol
257:)
225:Ol
206:Ol
184:)
62::
516:(
482:(
417:(
303:(
253:(
180:(
153:.
133:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
