Talk:Facundo Argüello (tennis)

1174:

from you. If the only thing was how it's worded we'd be done in a second. In English language professional tennis it is spelled Arguello. The press does the same. Goodness he even registered with the ITF, spelling it without diacritics. "Known professionally as" was one of many tried wordings. Originally the style was (English: Facundo Arguello)... simple and quick. I had administrator input that liked that version. As I recall in the many conversations "spelled in English, Facundo Arguello" was also liked by some. I was open to suggestion as to the best wording but was always greeted by a certain group with no compromise at all. none. zero. That's not what consensus is... it's not a majority or super majority, it a compromise to try and make all parties satisfied. And if it was one source spelling his name this way, we could say it's trivial, but the average English reader checking up on this guy will only see it spelled "Facundo Arguello" no matter where he looks. It is a significant alternate version of his name. Though wiki says it should be in the first sentence I wasn't married to that either and suggested other placements in the paragraph. Response was the same within that same small group. zip. You have to remember where I started. The players were listed at their common name in English. So the wiki article would have been titled "Facundo Arguello". Many had no Argentine-type spelling at all. After talking with an administrator I made sure that those articles were of the form - Facundo Arguello (Spanish: Facundo Argüello). I thought is was censorship not to include his home country spelling even though no English sources used that spelling. All my created articles used this form. Some reverted me but most did not. Then things got strange when articles moved from common name to birth country specific name. I was sure not happy about that (and still not happy) but that's the way it goes sometimes at wikipedia. But then suddenly all references to a player's common spelling started to be erased as if it never existed. When you have the governing bodies of a players profession spelling his name a certain way it's not trivial. With these players Wimbledon, US Open, French Open and Australian Open also use his common name. Davis Cup and major English new outlets ditto. This is significant. Encyclopedia Britannica uses the common spelling first with Ilie Nastase but notes it is also spelled Ilie Năstase. This is where I and others are coming from on this. Usually "my way or the highway" is all we get from several editors, but you are actually engaging a conversion with questions. That's always a good thing.

1578:

etc,) he wanted to use only one source (the ITF tennis registration) and I guess never use diacritics. That essay was also not in his user space but instead plopped into the Tennis project space. So an rfc was implemented on that particular essay with the title "Can a wikiproject require no-diacritics names, based on an organisation's rule or commonness in English press?". That particular essay was resoundingly defeated, we cannot ban diacritics. It was then edited by many editors and also put back in his personal user space. It really has no bearing on this argument at all. In fact this argument's rfc is almost the flipside... "Should we unilaterally ban the use of well sourced alternative English spellings at Knowledge (XXG)?" Some editors seem to want that, even going so far as to fight against a player's own personal webpages that use the English alphabet alternate spelling of their own name. That's not what wikipedia is about. When you have a tennis player's name spelled in American style English by one or two newspapers that's one thing... when it's found at Wimbledon, the Australian Open, LA Times, the ITF, the ATP, Davis Cup, plus is a spelling they register with at the governing body of tennis, it takes on a lot more meaning. If other people in other professions, such as music, also have their governing bodies, Hollywood Bowls, Musicians Quarterly, Sydney Opera House, London Philharmonic, etc... if they use an alternative spelling then surely that should at least be mentioned here at wikipedia. I really don't think that's an issue like it is in tennis though. We aren't talking about article titles or even the first name in the lead sentence... just a mention of the alternate spelling.

2781:. When we see something in the press that says so and so won the "channel-slam" we aren't going to use that term here at wikipedia if there's only one press release that prints it. However if the ITF or ATP or Wimbledon also uses the term, then it's proper to include it in a tennis article. Or if multiple sports outlets also use the term it become legit. It may not headline the article but we also wouldn't ignore the existence or censor it out. Now, if IPIN is the only source using Hong Kong as a separate country when determining inclusion in a particular article then no, we wouldn't use it. It's only one source of many. However, if every English source says a fribit flower only grows in Gibraltar, then to not mention that fact would be bad, and to ban it's use completely would be horrific. Remember something else... some of these player's own websites and signatures are spelled using the English alphabet. We have some editors posting here that that should also be banned from wikipedia, and that those players, regardless of how they spell their own names in English must be bound by their mother tongue. That just isn't right in my book and if we have major organizations, venues, tennis registrations, newspapers and tv all spelling something a particular way then it deserves at lease a cursory mention here at wikipedia. 1244:

certainly have it as should Nastase (as it does in Britannica). As far as being flexible, you can't compare where we started at with article being titled in the English alphabet to where we are now. I have seen "zero" flexibility in some in each step of the process while I have been willing to change... but only to a certain point. The complete and total censorship of a well sourced name by respected organizations, and often used by the player's themselves, is a final step I can't take and still be fair to our readers. And the "no such thing" as spellings in different locals I know to be false by personal experience with my own family. The "chicken mother" and "crap" comments I leave for others to worry about. As I said, I have no problems with discussing the situation and listening to other points of view where some other compromise I hadn't considered might come about. I thought this is what we were discussing.

2613:, and that majority-usage English spellings must be stripped out of existing articles. If RfCs about stub articles have agreed otherwise, they have still not changed established policies or guidelines. But there are not unlimited numbers of unpaid volunteers to police Knowledge (XXG) against English-stripping vandals. If few people volunteer for Admin. duties, and Editor numbers continue to drop, then you know who will have earned the credit for this. If English Knowledge (XXG) ceases to be a respected authority for the way that names are written in English by professional editors—and ceases to be a reliable, neutral, properly-sourced and trustworthy reference—then users will eventually figure this out and move on. The 1459:". This would be massively disruptive to up to 10% of en.wp's 4 million articles, wheras reopening and enforcing the RfC would only upset 1 editor, an editor who has a personal family reason for his conviction - "I know to be false by personal experience with my own family." which is fine if one wants to feel they have an "English name" and a "Polish name" when visiting relatives. But that comes with a change of passport. François Hollande is still French, he has not dropped his ç when taking an English passport. Knowledge (XXG) doesn't exist to issue "English names" to the world's notable BLPs. Fyunck will never agree to this, which is why the RfC needs to be reopened and turn off this dripping tap. 1622:, regardless of whether sportswriters bother to do so, and regardless of whether sports governing bodies can get their heads out of the butts far enough to implement modern player registration and stats tracking systems that are capable of properly recording the names of people who aren't from Wessex or Idaho. Knowledge (XXG) is not in the business of rewriting people's real, provable, legal names just because some third parties in the sports world feel free to do so out of laziness or incompetence. Reliable sources on which player won by what point score are not automatically reliable sources on linguistics and human nomenclature. Learn this. Know it. 2350:

English knows the English version of his name". But you, Ohconfucius, have proven that this view is wrong: people like you who are not native speakers of English come to English Knowledge (XXG) to find correct and trustworthy information about how the names of even famous and well-known people like Walesa are spelled in English by professional editors, by reputable sources like the Nobel prize committee, and by people like Mitt Romney. When Knowledge (XXG) does not contain this information, they are forced to guess—and they guess wrong (Walensa?). So it is clearly unacceptable to strip out the majority English spelling, as with the

1188:(Back after a business trip.) If the difference is negligable (which it is), and even the least gifted reader of the article wouldn't need the "explanation" (he/she wouldn't), then it should be removed, regardless of wording, and regardless of how many sources spell it without the diacritic, because it's not mentionworthy, the triviality of it is an insult to readers. If it is so important as you claim, then why is it only implemented in a few tennis articles on barely notable players – articles which you seem to guard as a chicken mother – and not in for instance the article on 2720:

as opposed to Dokovic. The ITF(ILTF) also has bylaws that require it to use English. A single printing of someone's name can be sloppy or lazy, but not 100s or thousands of times like some players. That tennis names rfc pertained to a particular personal essay about banning the use all available sources at wikipedia, and that's not what wikipedia is about. There have been plenty of other full-range rfc's on diacritics that have been pretty evenly split, plus a recent rfc on this very subject that was no consensus. So I have no idea where you're coming from.

1290:" type ledes. But Fyunck already to Prokonsul Piotrus and elsewhere twice explained his conviction that when he visits Poland his British surname reverts to his father's name with a diacritic - Prokonsul Piotrus told him otherwise but that's by the by - so the argument "just as Fyunck isn't suddenly spelled "Fyünck" if you go to Germany or Austria – or Argentine" is going up against a brick wall. 6 months later it should be evident that no one by any amount of Talk discussion or edit reverting can convince User Fyunck to stop adding these 1803:. So, local consensus (e.g., what the folks here say) seems to be guiding until a consensus can be reached that covers a wider range of articles. There's no doubt I'm somewhat frustrated by this issue at this point, and I would recommend finding a different admin to close any questions of local consensus (whether it be on this article, or over the tennis project) going forward. I will extend move protection, however, as I believe that TENNISNAMES does cover that. -- 817:- and I am for following the English sources as we are supposed to be doing here at wikipedia. We have the ITF and ATP sources on this article. The only diacritic source given is from a non-English source. Wiki tells us to "Follow the general usage in reliable sources that are written in the English language." We usually have full names in the article body but the title should be kept at the sourced English alphabetic spelling. In addition to the ITF and ATP we have 422: 127: 401: 106: 1100:'s website. As you see, many players, including Argüello, have their names spelled with diacritics. Are you questioning that the website is about professional tennis? Or do you mean they don't view Argüello as a pro? Or that he's a pro only when playing abroad? Or possibly only in the English-speaking world? No, your generalization is obviously wrong. And if you insist on English-language websites spelling with diacritics, check 246: 973:

kept things running smoothly...so be it. We still have an open RfC on this issue, plus multiple ANI's. I was willing to let things stay status quo for wiki's sake, but I'm gonna guess you'll call in your usual couple of bully-boys here. We'll see. As always we can try different wording but that hasn't satisfied you in the past. I'm always open for discussion for the proper placement and wording, but not censoring.

2214:

sources (like the NY Times, and the Polish American Culture Center—even Mitt Romney spells his name without diacritics, what could be more conclusive than that ;-) even if Knowledge (XXG) doesn't do it that way. But surely this does not apply to the other people mentioned above: the majority usage in English should be clearly spelled out—especially when the person is not so well known that most people know it.

432: 2633:

accordance to their own language's rules. What they do to standard English alphabet names is often funny, but hey it's their wiki so they can do what they please and add what they want. It's your "my way or the highway" no compromise attitude and attempt at censoring wikipedia that has brought me here. And now what I thought started as an exchange of ideas to come to a compromise has turned into a dustbowl.

544: 520: 2294:

articles on them are rarely visited, while the opposite goes for the latter players. This is why Fyunck – and possibly one or two other editors – can play these silly games as a petty revenge for being on the losing side of the discussion on diacritic-titled articles (which ended up with a result that didn't please them), while going virtually unnoticed by the wider community of wikipedia editors.

75: 606: 2755:

editors alike) then treat this rendering as an 'authoritative English spelling'. This in fact allows the ITF (and the like) to continue the practices either because somebody doesn't want to accept letters with diacritics or their computer systems are not geared up to cope with them. It would have been free choice if it weren't the only gig in town, but it is, and they have to take

137: 1030:

particular spelling for the professional player Facundo Arguello. Just because you don't like it, isn't good enough and your extra days comment was useless. As I said, the wording can be tweaked as we've done in other articles. We also have the official tournament he entered to gain his tennis notability... the Copa Claro Open. Their pdf of entries also spells it

658: 618: 2163:, and that nobody can show otherwise. You don't have to agree with something that is grossly misleading, gross misrepresentation that compromises Knowledge (XXG)'s integrity, neutrality, and trustworthiness. If you agree to this BS then surely the same will happen to all the articles with the widely-accepted English version of the name only in the lede. 833:. There are lots of these type English sources for this English wikipedia as opposed to the foreign language that most English readers can't fathom. This submitter is doing a lot of these move requests as of late to try and remove anglicized names from wikipedia article titles and even from use as an alternate spelling in the main article body. 1203:". Yet, you are accusing me – and anyone who dares to remove the crap – of an attitude of "my way or the highway". I'm not sure that you have realized the irony in that. This issue is pretty digital: it's either there (in some form), or it isn't, so there's no point in accusing either side of being rigid. It can't be there ... sort of. 2736:"Gibraltar", "French Guiana" &c as separate countries - shall we go round "correcting" each article that mentions them to reflect the quirks of IPIN input-validation? Or shall we accept that the arbitrary constraints of the IPIN database do not constitute the most reliable source on English orthography or international politics? 554: 2754:

make it so). Under such system, players don't have the choice of how to correctly spell their name but instead they have to opt for the 'least bad' solution using letters without any adornment ;-). And when these players go on the circuit, these errors get replicated and the press (and some wikipedia

2719:

Very important sources spell his name without diacritics when you are talking the ITF, ATP, ESPN, etc... Tennis players use a registration system with the ITF also, where they are asked how they would like their names spelled using the English alphabet. The number 1 player in the world chose Djokovic

2398:

PS 'Lech Walesa' and 'Lech Walensa' are two spellings that are often found in English-language media (neither of which are 'right'), to the extent that the uninitiated would wonder how his name was actually spelt; or even more confusion in working out how it's pronounced. There are 9 redirects to his

2011:

Ohconfucius is correct... whether LB is right or wrong means little in the conversation as the title or diacritics is not what was being discussed. The best way to handle multiple sourced spellings is what is at hand and Ohconfucius came up with his best compromise to try to satisfy both sides of the

1834:

If you page through the first 18 pages of Google results, there is only one Indian newspaper with a couple of pages that have the name with diacritics in a title (and seemingly identical pages that have the name without diacritics if you click on "Profile")—but no content whatsoever about the player,

3093:

As to essays, you are welcome to do whatever you want in your sandpit and then point to it, but there's still the question of why someone who doesn't contribute to relevant articles and has no apparent experience or expertise in any related area be writing "essays" for editors who actually do create

2865:

It seems that there are still a significant number of editors on en.wp who still stick out for the "English doesn't have diacritics" approach. However, I surveyed the sister language-wikis for 'Lech Wałęsa' and was pleased to note that the vast majority of those employing Roman script spelt his name

2830:

Quote: Fyunck's additions will only serve the purpose of saying "Hey, did you notice that his name was spelled Facundo Arguello in some sources?". Reply: Didn't you read the above? There surely isn't a single reliable source that spells his name with diacritics in English. English Knowledge (XXG) is

1968:

A simple Google search shows that the plain English spelling without diacritics is used virtually universally in English (except for a single Indian newspaper that seems to have copied Knowledge (XXG)'s article title)—and you are proposing to completely completely eliminate it (the widely-recognized

1577:

Yes, you are correct Ohconfucius. That rfc was brought about by an editor writing a personal essay to try and change Tennis Project guidelines. Instead of using sourcing from all types of English sources (newspapers, Wimbledon, tv, Britannica, the governing bodies of tennis, ITF tennis registration,

1070:

The question is whether there is any support for the particular claim in the article; that Argüello is "known professionally as Facundo Arguello" – as opposed to his real name, one has to assume. There is no such support. None of the sources indicate anything of the sort. Neither source has two name

1029:

I disagree. Two are the professional organizations that oversee tennis and they use a particular spelling. They are the governing bodies of tennis and it's who he registered with and the spelling he and they decided on when registering. The other 3 sources are respected in tennis and they also use a

1010:

I'm sorry, Fyunck, but none of the 5 sources you just added mention anything about what Argüello is being professionally known as. In fact, they are almost totally devoid of a narrative, and contains only short facts such as birth place, accumulated prize money, rankings, and so on. Thus, they do no

3152:

I'd been writing quite a few tennis biographies this year but lost the motivation as the articles are soon made into a joke by Fyunck or whoever it is that is inserting this "professionally known as" embarrassment onto pages. Why does there have to be a "compromise"? You compromise when there is no

2839:

about how the Nobel Committee, the Olympic Committee, the major international sports federations, and all the professional editors in all the major English press organizations actually render such names in English. The name with diacritics clearly is solely a foreign-language rendition, and belongs

2672:

was not specifically about stub articles. If we know how it's spelled, then there's no reason to spell it in another way than that, and introduce an "English-language spelling", when the difference is negligable. Fyunck's additions will only serve the purpose of saying "Hey, did you notice that his

2293:

are internationally well-known (to say the least) former tennis players. They too have a diacritic in their name. Yet, as far as I know, Fyunck has not attempted to add that nonsense to those articles. So what's the difference? The former players are barely known to the general public, and thus the

2232:

As already mentioned, I don't actually oppose including rendering of names that have diacritics natively in script without diacritics where it's necessary. It's good that you don't see the necessity of including the "Lech Walesa" rendering, and I certainly don't think 'Facundo Argüello' needs to be

1173:

When pretty much every English source spells something one way it is not unimportant and un-notable...and would be censorship not to include it. This is not his shoe size. I know very well that tweaking the wording can bring differences to the meaning, but I've tried them all with no positive input

991:

I note that you're not adressing the issue at hand. Do you have any sources that support your claim that he's "known professionally as Facundo Aguello"? And calling that phrase "content" – albeit unsourced – is stretching it a bit. You are aware that unsourced content can be removed immediately? It

2735:

Looks like circular reasoning to me; the IPIN registration form gives the erroneous impression that diacritics aren't part of the English language, so player names are registered without diacritics, so names without diacritics are English! Just for comparison, the IPIN database treats "Hong Kong",

2677:

in some sources?". It's pointless and in-the-face of people, and for no good reason. Also, there's nothing that supports the claim that he plays under another name that his own. Why would he do that? Tennis players don't use stage names. would it enable him to travel incognito under his real name?

2486:

Let me reiterate: I agree that "Walensa" is wrong; I also feel that English rendering without the diacritics would not be entirely inappropriate at that article, but to insist that we do that for 'Facundo Argüello' over a pathetic little umlaut is undoubtedly 'over the top'. So where do we go from

2372:

Me, not a native English-speaker? Have I ever written anything with blatant errors likely to make you think that is the case? Or are you sure than no native would ever be so supportive as I am of retaining diacritics and elevating their importance to their proper place in today's world? There's no

1517:

Perhaps your reading of the RfC is different to mine. My take is that it deals with what constitutes the title, where the discussion was firmly in favour of keeping diacritics. The above discussion is about mentioning how it's rendered in the lead section. The two are not mutually exclusive, IMHO.

1206:

Also, there is no such thing as "Argentine-type spelling" or "home country spelling" of personal names. How do you think his name is spelled in Germany or Austria? The spelling of his name doesn't change just because he crosses the borders into an English-speaking country. The spelling remains the

1121:

Your alternative suggestions have an entirely different meaning than the current unsupported claim. “Known professionally as” does not have the same meaning as “spelled in professional tennis” or “per the governing bodies … etc”. It's not the question of a rephrase or a different wording, it's not

3133:

The opening sentence of an article should not be a list of trivial name variations. The common name of the subject should be on top of the infobox, even if the article title is something else: "It should be named the common name of the article's subject...this does not need to match the article's

3061:

to get wider input on transparent, reproducible NPOV criteria and methods to determine majority usage in English, to try to stop the bitter and never-ending crusades to eliminate the use of English in English Knowledge (XXG). I agree that xenophobia may mean that the projects of certain countries

2349:

Quote Ohconfucius: "It's good that you don't see the necessity of including the "Lech Walesa" rendering". Reply: I would have thought that it might be acceptable to omit the most widely-used English spelling only in the case of somebody as famous as Walesa, because "surely every native speaker of

1920:

and virtually universal commonsense rules for spelling names in English doesn't make it OK to do so. Frivolously moving articles to titles with diacritics creates a lot of needless and pointless work; intimidating editors and administrators who refuse to go along with these games just poisons the

1560:

only contains 3 such players - which are still at "English names" so the 100x Facundo Argüello (tennis) ledes affected do not include these 3 anyway. The 100x ledes affected are all of the 'François Hollande', or 'Charlotte Brontë' do not come in the 3x "because their appearances are sufficiently

1477:

desirable, there are few such "universal ways" within the project. In practice, we are only talking about those marginal cases where someone might feel the need to 'explain away' diacritics that may exist in Slavonic names. In my view, it's unlikely for anyone to go to great lengths to so qualify

972:

And I thought an administrator had kept the truce till you came in again with your content removal. I had not added any more to other articles because of several administrators wishes to keep things calm, as long as no one did the reverse. Not what I wanted, to have censoring like that, but if it

2632:

These statements by HandsomeFella are getting stranger and stranger when it comes to the truth. And your last query was simply a loaded question. In any language the international governing bodies of tennis still spell it Arguello. Individual wikis spell names different all the time and often in

2213:

you will find that reliable sources, like the Nobel prize organization near the top of the search results, spell his name in English without diacritics, and don't use the "Lech Walensa" that you suggest. He is well enough known that most people know how his name is spelled in English in reliable

1798:

I would note that in a previous (apparently failed) attempt to deal with edit warring around this wording over dozens of articles, that I had ruled that TENNISNAME does not actually address the "professionally known as" issue precisely (although it would be nice if it had). An attempt to find a

1321:

Hello IIO, and thanks for the link to the RfC. I suspect that you have tried to bring my attention to it previously, but I haven't had the time to read it before. Very interesting. It was also somewhat humorous that it ended up exactly the opposite to the outcome hoped for by MakeSense64. By all

1034:. No matter which way you slice it, pro tennis spells his name Facundo Arguello. We can use "spelled in professional tennis, Facundo Arguello", or "per the governing bodies of tennis, and sports authorities, Facundo Arguello", etc... Certainly we should be flexible, just no censorship of facts. 2594:

You have arrived a little late to this discussion, so you might not know that there is an overwhelming consensus to keep articles with diacritics at their diacritical name for encyclopedic reasons, aside form the fact that this actually isn't what we're discussing here (see the heading of this

2140:

To be fair though, I haven't seen any margin of compromise from those on the other side in regards to your suggestion either. LB is just more vocal about it. LB is absolutely correct with his "usually" comment... I'm just willing to compromise down to your suggestion because that's what we are

2818:

Quote: Following the world, which is in turn following a gatekeeper who is illiterate... Reply: It is idiotic to claim that the Nobel prize committee is illiterate, that the people who run the Olympics are illiterate, that all the professional editors in all the major press organizations are

2187:

You seem to take strongest issue with the "sometimes" in my proposal; I don't know if "often" would be acceptable to you. But my view is that using 'Lech Walensa' as a person's name when it should be 'Lech Wałęsa' is what is truly "grossly misleading, gross misrepresentation that compromises

1243:

Well we have a difference of opinion on triviality. If it was so trivial than some others wouldn't insist on changing a name to the diacritic version. As far as what pages it's been added to, I've been following the agreement not to add more as long as none are removed. Borg's article should

2508:

I note that Fyunck isn't offering any counter-argument to my last post, the reason of course being that he can't come up with any. Instead he can only repeat his "my way or the highway" accusation. The rediculous expression is either in there, in some form, or it isn't, so the accusation is

1780:

little monuments to xenonymophobia then that's still annoying but evidently not as annoying. Seems that about 50x of the 100x articles you have given "professionally known as" ledes to are your own creations. You should remove your ledes from those created by other WP:TENNIS editors.

1071:

fields, one "professional name" and one "real name". There is only one name field. Yes, in that field, they are spelling his name without the diacritic. But so what? Do you mean that this implicitly supports the claim? I can't imagine implicit support is good enough as to count as

1775:

but what the heck, Fyunck is that you should at the least remove your ledes from e.g. tennis editor Jevansen's articles since although he hasn't reverted them (with 1 exception I think), but he has described it in edit summary as "removing the crap". If you want to make articles

2318:? This proves that it's rubbish. It's very hard to assume good faith on Fyunck's side for adding that crap to any low-profile tennis player article he can get his hands on, but not to other tennis player articles – where it would be removed promptly. (Thanks, Google Translate.) 2354:. What is the best way to handle the idiotic situation where the majority English spelling has been stripped from the article? In the case of the Lech Walesa article, something like "spelled Lech Walesa in major English sources" in the lede would surely be appropriate. 2334:

And here I thought you were wanting to discuss this nicely and intelligently. I guess we can throw that out with the bathwater after seeing this rubbish post. Ohconfucius was constructive and tried, while this post is just "my way or the highway" bad faith once again.

2617:

only coexisted for under sixty years. Will English Knowledge (XXG) last as long as that if people continue to fight to destroy its credibility and real-world usefulness? What's next—replacing English article titles with Latin, "because English is derived from Latin"?

2258:

be the English Knowledge (XXG) article title. That is like using a Chinese, Japanese or Korean name in an article title and then stripping out the common English version of the name from the article because "everybody knows it, and there are redirects from it".

1056:

I'm not questioning the authority of the organizations that run those websites, so you don't need to bother going down that line. But the fact that they are professional organizations or governing bodies does not mean that they support any claim by some sort of

3094:

and contribute to articles to follow. I find your behaviour considerably more problematic than Fyunck - who actually does create and contribute. Half of these "professionally known as" ledes are his own article creations. But you don't contribute at all.

1478:

tens of thousands of names with familiar diacritics such as 'François Hollande', or 'Charlotte Brontë'. But if they feel the urge to do that, I don't see that as a huge problem, unless anyone is determined to oppose such construction "at all costs". --

2464:. Surely an ability to research what reputable major sources use in English is a desirable minimum acceptable competence level for contributing to English Knowledge (XXG)? Surely it is unacceptable not to make this preferred English spelling clear in 1871:, but it completely ignores the fact that Spanish and French diacritics are already widely employed for proper names throughout English language sources on all soubjects (independently of whether tennis ones do or not), and the sound arguments stated 1302:

cover Fyunck's "professionally known as" ledes or not? The amount of bytes involved on this talk page would already have been enough to reopen the RfC and notify participants. I do appreciate your argument, but it would be better cut-and-pasted into

2233:

so stripped either – as most readers you have in mind would probably ignore the umlaut anyway. Perhaps we can agree that only those names that include the most abundant unfamiliar diacritics – and not just the most famous – need this treatment... --

1341:. Time for someone else to step up, which I know you have before. Cheers. It's a slam dunk anyway, the original RfC was a snow result in favour of quality sources, and keeping it simple, "do we want these 100x ledes or not?" should be enough. 1916:. You are giving the fait accompli argument: that commonsense rules for spelling names in English—and Knowledge (XXG) guidelines—have already been widely ignored in Knowledge (XXG), "which makes it OK to do so". But that people have ignored 953:

Facundo Aguello", although there is no proof whatsoever that Argüello competes under another name than his own. If he did, he would most certainly try to find a name that differed more from his own than one that is just missing a diacritic.

2550:(at a title with diacritics) because you like it that way (or because "not to use diacritics is unethical", or some such rubbish) regardless of Knowledge (XXG) guidelines or the English-language usage of real-world professional editors. 3192: 2776:

It's not a question of why the governing bodies of tennis, news agencies, tennis venues, sports sites, etc. use a particular spelling. It's a question of following all the sources. It's overwhelming in the English sources to use the

2901:

PS: Using the search methods described above, it looks as if Björn Borg and Anders Järryd strongly prefer their names to be written with diacritics (Borg apparently uses his name as a brand for selling men's underwear), but

2800:

correct way to spell the person's name, whatever any "authority" has to say. But' I'm still open to having a rendering without diacritics somewhere in the article - perhaps the infobox might be the place: under 'alias'...

1552:"because their appearances are sufficiently different as to potentially cause confusion" - and this exception was recognised in the RfC, and should continue to be recognised as an exception if the RfC is reopened too. The 1122:

the same meaning at all. What is you really want with your addition? Does it only boil down to your hot desire to mention that some websites lose the diacritic? Why is that so all important to you? As you said yourself,

3095: 2795:

Following the world, which is in turn following a gatekeeper who is illiterate is not the way to go because it sacrifices encyclopaedic accuracy. If an individual's name is habitually written in Romanic script, there's

1192:? Many people won't notice the absence of the diacritic, and the rest don't care, so basically, the only function of the remark is "Hey, did you notice that it was spelled without the diacritic in some sources?". 1424:

That is certainly not my choice at all (especially the "sometimes" as opposed to "usually" or "often")... but if that's what it takes to make this issue go away I'd live with that and move on as a compromise.

2297:

Now, if we look at what Fyunck has kept adding and re-adding, time after time, on low-profile tennis player article after low-profile tennis player article, "known professionally as X X", it is a claim that,

2046:

that is the problem. It doesn't represent what he is called in reputable English sources. Surely it's important to make clear what is the most widely-accepted way of writing a name in English, as discussed

2569: 1336:

Hey HF. If you don't mind I won't be the one to reopen the RfC, I evidently have a couple of hardcore opponents of foreigners having foreign names fuming and steaming after a series of RMs culminating in

1101: 885: 2055:

should really represent the most recognizable and widely-accepted way that a name is written in reputable English sources, so usually the seldom-used foreign-language version would appear in the lede.

788:. I'm not interested in personal attacks against other editors (and I'm slightly surprised to see a prolific editor arriving at yet another move discussion involving diacritics and then accusing the 3264: 636: 2381:

team. As to Mitt Romney, I don't see how this Mid-Westerner qualifies as any sort of authority on Lech Wałęsa – he's just another American who won't know a diacritic if it hit him in the face. --

1147:, let go of that rediculous argument of "censorship". You can't go on and add every tiny little piece of unimportant and unnotable information, and then, if people remove it, cry "CENSORSHIP". 668: 328: 1079:

the diacritic applied would support that he is "professionally known as Facundo Argüello", wouldn't they? Both statements obviously can't be true. So, likewise obviously, neither of them are.

3259: 2595:

section). And contrary to what you seem to believe, a proposal to add the rubbish that Fyunck keeps adding (as some sort of consolation prize) was resoundingly defeated by the community.

3018:

LittleBenW, the amount of noise and disruption and personal attacks you have spread on MOS, WMF, Talk pages etc. against en.wp consensus for foreigner's names being spelled according to

2069:

György Balázs is yet another example of this "just add diacritics, but don't bother to confirm the correct name on foreign-language Knowledge (XXG)" sloppiness. A simple Google search

1322:

means, go ahead and reopen the RfC (or start a new one), you're better than me at that, but in my view there's no doubt the existing one actually supports the removal of this rubbish.

1943:

diacritics creates a lot of needless and pointless work; intimidating editors and administrators who refuse to go along with these games just poisons the Knowledge (XXG) environment.

1561:

different as to potentially cause confusion" - there is no "François/Francois" "Brontë/Bronte" confusion issue as with Dj/Đ. Hence this is simply confirming the original RfC result.

54: 1391:

It seems that "known professionally as..." construction is causing some huge issues. I have known that this type of wording has been employed by those against adopting diacritics

3062:

will argue that articles about their country will not recognize Knowledge (XXG) guidelines as to reliable sources in English, but that's something that can be discussed later.

324: 1541:

Hi OhConfucious. Correct, as you say (1) no, the RfC didn't anticipate that the disruption would move from titles to ledes, hence the need to reopen the RfC, (2) no, with the

2976:, and a few dozen more. Isn't it remarkable that some people could strip every single instance of the majority English spelling of his name out of English Knowledge (XXG)? A 2827:

in reputable English sources, not the usage of paper encyclopedias that can't afford to substantially revise and update style guides/content created ten or twenty years ago.

2678:

The reason ITF spells it without the diacritic is either sloppiness or laziness, and that doesn't give him another name that he would be "professionally known" by (giggle).

631: 530: 2081:

if the person is notable. If not, then the shortened English version of the name may be a nickname. If you do some research as to how the name is written in English media:

2048: 347: 2085:

I think you will see only two articles in the first 18 pages of search results that use diacritics, and both of these articles are obvious ripoffs from Knowledge (XXG).

1839:. Surely this is pretty conclusive evidence that virtually nobody uses the name with diacritics in English? Yet we have people who would go so far as to say that it is 3058: 59: 1816: 2995:;-). Isn't it "unethical" to "dumb down" a Polish name with diacritics, so that as many people as possible worldwide can read, write, remember, and revere it? 1282:

Hi HandsomeFella, what you say above is logical, sensible and conforms with en.wp's 4.0 million articles, minus the 100x tennis BLPs which have double-barreled "

3269: 2570:

http://www.google.com/search?q="Facundo Argüello" soccer -futbolista -tennis -tenis -ATP -Wimbledon -court -site:es.* -site:*.ar -site:wikipedia.org -wikipedia

1847:

not to use the name with diacritics, and "commonsense" to completely eliminate the universally-used plain-English version of the name. The counter-argument is

502: 2042:

is a very big compromise) written that way in reputable English sources. Your "usually known as" or "professionally known as" are quite appropriate. It's the

3219: 830: 42:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or 2460:—like the Nobel committee, for example—use. Surely they confirm the preferred English spelling with the recipient of the prize. Google will tell you that 1939:

We're in fact digressing, because this ought to take place centrally. The opposite to what you said also applies: - frivolously moving articles to titles

1499:

was a snow result for not treating tennis players differently from other human beings. Even the majority of tennis editors are opposed to Fyunck's ledes.

3244: 492: 2141:

supposed to do in trying to find a consensus all can live with. It's not supposed to be either or, we are trying to satisfy all parties as best we can.

2082: 1522:

to mention that the name may be rendered as "Novak Djokovic", because their appearances are sufficiently different as to potentially cause confusion. --

572: 195: 34: 2907: 366: 1731:. This nonsense is bordering on Anglo-American anti-ethnic discrimination and needs to stop. I call on the more reasonable people participating in 466: 3274: 3249: 3229: 185: 1374: 891:

is the only proper spelling for this name in English (per authoritative sources). The current title deviates from established practice and fails

576: 360: 265: 1093: 3254: 3239: 3022:, is completely out of proportion to your contribution (as far as I can see zero contribution) to any affected BLP or geo articles. Please see 2210: 1553: 3135: 3090:

Again, to demonstrate that there's no xenophobia involved in the discussion then you should go for British and American names with diacritics.

1195:

You know, Fyunck, it's a little bit funny, how you pretend to be ever so flexible over the wording, but essentially, what you really say is "

859:

which contains 5x French BLPs that are egregious even in their own category. If 2 RMs is "a lot", I tempted to ask what is a few? As regards

1443:

was a snow result for not treating tennis BLPs differently from other BLPs. To be consistent we'd have to (a) apply to non-tennis players, "

208: 3234: 2651:" was stripped out of the Walesa article on June 29—guess who?—but this Argüello article has just been changed to read "also rendered as". 1557: 733:– (1) primary notability in home country: per article La Voz, Argentina "Facundo Argüello, esperanza del tenis nacional" 27 Nov 2010, (2) 305: 3027: 2887:

What is (or is not) English is not defined by what the Polish "sister Knowledge (XXG)" does. They would not be critics of diacritics ;-)

298: 161: 571:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge (XXG)'s articles about people. All interested editors are invited to 3224: 1819:. What this search does is (1) search for articles containing the name with diacritics, (2) include articles with the word "tennis" but 343: 309: 2669: 2614: 1849: 1828: 1500: 1496: 1440: 1304: 1299: 1295: 580: 1815:

It is quite easy to do a fair and objective search to find the most common form of this name in English-language media using Google:

567: 525: 460: 445: 406: 1757: 1674: 1395:

that such use is incorrect. I would suggest alternative wording: "spelling sometimes rendered as" that would seem to be a lot more

1879:

the subject's correctly-spelt name, so that the existing spelling ought to be retained for the sake of encyclopaedic accuracy. --

855:, but also an adhominem. "This submitter" (myself) have precisely 2x RMs submitted, this one (which is evidently egregious) and 317: 150: 111: 86: 2984:—who is in Warsaw, Poland—and contained the Polish spelling with diacritics only in the lede. I like the second motto on the 272: 2918:: "Encyclopedia Britannica uses the common spelling first with Ilie Nastase but notes it is also spelled Ilie Năstase". 1842: 2953: 2750:

The system described above effectively makes the ITF the guardian of players names in English (which of course does not

2565: 2510: 1708: 738: 730: 707: 456: 3153:

consensus either way. "Professionally known as" is in articles where there was clear support for a move to diacritics (

1835:

and two or three French-language articles on about the 18th page of search results that show the name with diacritics.

934:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

895:("Facundo Arguello" is not an anglicized spelling like Florence; it is a common misspelling like "Soren Kierkegaard"), 699:

Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

664: 2835:

about how his name would be rendered in Chinese, Japanese, Korean, or in his home country. English Knowledge (XXG) is

2254:

The form of the name that is seldom used or never used by reputable English publishers and the English media should

1817:

http://www.google.com/search?q="Facundo Argüello" tennis -tenis -site:es.* -site:*.ar -site:wikipedia.org -wikipedia

2937: 2277:

While Argüello is far from the top, he is an international professional tennis player, isn't he? The same goes for

822: 2945: 1097: 1072: 863:

please read on beyond the sentence you have quoted and look at the examples it gives for Irish and Norse, cheers.

43: 726: 2941: 1641: 1031: 907:(sources whose house styles lead to constant spelling errors are not reliable on the relevant spelling issues). 3154: 2609:

There are no naming policies or guidelines that say that majority-usage English spellings must not be used in

2374: 1123: 734: 92: 2961: 1771:

We could just leave this as a monument to stupidity. What I would say here, which goes completely counter to

3200: 3123: 3043: 2786: 2725: 2683: 2638: 2600: 2527: 2340: 2325: 2146: 2017: 1786: 1583: 1566: 1508: 1464: 1430: 1346: 1327: 1312: 1249: 1214: 1179: 1152: 1039: 1016: 997: 978: 962: 868: 838: 754: 2977: 2973: 860: 852: 74: 2568:

requires a much longer search string in order to eliminate the flood of results from his tennis namesake:

2083:

http://www.google.com/search?q="György Balázs" tennis -site:hu.* -site:*.hu -site:wikipedia.org -wikipedia

1291: 1105: 888: 2074: 1747: 1664: 1542: 160:

on Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join

3107: 2841: 2824: 2043: 1917: 1736: 742: 2302:, wouldn't it? That is, in es.wiki, the article on Argüello would say "conocido profesionalmente como 1800: 3067: 3000: 2923: 2892: 2849: 2656: 2623: 2581: 2555: 2473: 2359: 2264: 2219: 2168: 2090: 2070: 2060: 1974: 1926: 1858: 1807: 1444: 1338: 53:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to 2957: 2519: 1728: 1704: 1653: 1638: 1392: 1207:

same, just as Fyunck isn't suddenly spelled "Fyünck" if you go to Germany or Austria – or Argentine.

1196: 1127: 657: 258: 3057:, so any reference to Charlotte Brontë is totally inappropriate. I am putting together an essay at 2741: 1827:(http://es. etc., like Spanish Knowledge (XXG)) from the results, (4) eliminate web sites with the 1452: 1382: 805: 3030:

and express your views on foreigners' names there. Otherwise the discussion should be centred on "

2119: 1868: 1732: 1724: 1688: 1649: 1519: 1503:. Tennis players are the one group that shouldn't have these ledes even if Charlotte Brontë does. 1495:

Hi Ohconfucius, in other cases maybe, maybe not, I don't know. But in this specific case as above

3196: 3172: 3162: 3143: 3119: 3079: 3039: 3026:, and if you have further comments about Polish names, as before you are welcome to take them to 2915: 2782: 2721: 2679: 2634: 2596: 2523: 2428: 2336: 2321: 2211:

http://www.google.com/search?q="Lech Wałęsa" -site:*.pl -site:pl.* -site:wikipedia.org -wikipedia

2142: 2013: 1782: 1579: 1562: 1504: 1460: 1426: 1342: 1323: 1308: 1245: 1210: 1175: 1148: 1035: 1012: 993: 974: 958: 946: 864: 856: 834: 776: 750: 716: 449:, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to 57:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see 3115: 3103: 3023: 1772: 1720: 1700: 1630: 50: 2992: 2965: 2933: 2351: 2278: 818: 372: 17: 2969: 2949: 1719:, is concrete proof that this is not a Knowledge (XXG) issue, it's a boorish non-issue being 1634: 1626: 1396: 336: 3204: 3188: 3176: 3166: 3147: 3127: 3111: 3099: 3071: 3047: 3004: 2927: 2896: 2878: 2869: 2853: 2813: 2804: 2790: 2778: 2771: 2762: 2756: 2745: 2729: 2687: 2660: 2642: 2627: 2604: 2585: 2559: 2540:

that use this name with diacritics. All the sources use the name without diacritics. Surely

2531: 2499: 2490: 2477: 2447: 2438: 2393: 2384: 2363: 2344: 2329: 2286: 2268: 2245: 2236: 2223: 2200: 2191: 2172: 2150: 2134: 2125: 2094: 2064: 2021: 2002: 1993: 1978: 1959: 1950: 1930: 1891: 1882: 1862: 1809: 1790: 1762: 1742: 1684: 1679: 1659: 1587: 1570: 1534: 1525: 1512: 1490: 1481: 1468: 1434: 1415: 1406: 1386: 1350: 1331: 1316: 1253: 1218: 1183: 1156: 1043: 1020: 1001: 982: 966: 916: 912: 872: 842: 809: 780: 758: 720: 559: 437: 3054: 2820: 2610: 1735:

to speak up and assure the rest of Knowledge (XXG) that they don't support this xenophobic

1645: 1644:, please. The entire world do not use basic English's default 26 bare-letter alphabet, and 1607: 957:

I have cn-ed it, and I suggest we eventually (pending this discussion) remove the rubbish.

896: 3180: 3063: 2996: 2932:

PPS: Surely it's not all that difficult to research how the name of somebody as famous as

2919: 2888: 2845: 2652: 2619: 2577: 2551: 2469: 2355: 2260: 2215: 2164: 2086: 2056: 1970: 1922: 1904:

The results show quite clearly that, for this name, diacritics are not used in English in

1854: 1804: 3019: 2903: 2290: 2052: 1696: 1692: 925: 892: 746: 690: 1618:, which they almost never are. The proper usage in modern English formal writing is to 1451:" and not to appear racist we'd also have to apply it to British and American accents, " 126: 105: 2737: 2432: 1378: 801: 245: 2991:

PPPS: Another famous Polish person whose name is widely spelled without diacritics is

1400: 904: 421: 400: 3213: 3184: 3158: 3139: 2373:

point any longer talking to someone who's xenophobic and obviously just as sloppy at

2282: 1831:, and (5) eliminate all of Knowledge (XXG).org and sites that cite "Knowledge (XXG)". 1189: 772: 768: 712: 623: 290: 278: 142: 826: 2412: 286: 282: 2416: 2122:. But anyways, looks like there isn't any margin for compromise from LittleBen. -- 3193:

Knowledge (XXG):Requests for Comment/Duplicate name in basic ASCII character set

2985: 2981: 2424: 2408: 908: 2461: 1294:(sic) ledes to BLPs. For better or worse the only route available is to reopen 605: 543: 519: 949:

has been constantly re-adding the nonsensical clause "known professionally as

613: 549: 427: 132: 2306:", and in sv.wiki, the article on Windahl would say "känd professionellt som 2420: 1824: 451: 154:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to 2034:

rendered in English as" is ridiculous. A little research shows that it is

3096:

Knowledge (XXG):Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass

3053:

This discussion is not about WikiProject Poland, this discussion is about

1715:

of other articles at names with diacritics, from Turks to Irish to Thai,

3038:" to demonstrate that there's no xenophobia involved in the discussion. 2435:, so woe betide anyone who fails to find him here on Knowledge (XXG). -- 371:

Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every

136: 3191:

as you commented above, FYI this matter is under further discussion at

2456:

The preferred spelling in English is the spelling that the majority of

2404: 1837:

I can't see the name with diacritics in the body of the articles either

1729:

more interested in "sport argument" than in working on the encyclopedia

1298:, notify all the original participants and specify, does the result of 2118:– the name of the article isn't under discussion. And as UncleG says, 1439:

Hi OhConfucius, thanks for your sensible input, but the result of the

2400: 156: 2936:

is really written in English by publishing professionals? Examples

2574:

no reliable English sources whatsoever for the name with diacritics

579:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the 2281:(albeit retired now), right? In contrast to Argüello and Windahl, 2075:

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:hu.wikipedia.org György Balázs

741:. (3) per examples in Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Biographies 2980:

problem? This Walesa article was originally created in 2001 by

2188:

Knowledge (XXG)'s integrity, neutrality, and trustworthiness" --

1549: 2071:

http://www.google.com/search?q=site:wikipedia.org György Balázs

1683:

PS: The next time someone tries to force this article to be at

652: 465:

and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our

68: 49:

from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially

26: 1075:. But if you really mean that, then English-language sources 1092:"Pro tennis spells his name Facundo Arguello". Indeed? Look 604: 1545: 2114:

Try 'Balázs György'. That's the native form in Hungarian.

2536:

The discussion above makes it quite clear that there are

1969:

and preferred plain English spelling) from the article?

1947:

discussion is about how we should formulate the lead. --

1518:

And it is not wholly unreasonable to expect the lead of

689:

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a

2819:

illiterate, and that you know better. Particularly for

1987: 1872: 1646:

this is just a fact you're going to have to get used to

234: 229: 224: 219: 1377:

in the article? It's a misspelling, not a stage name.

1011:

support the claim. But I'll give you a few days more.

924:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

899:(we must write encyclopedically and "get the article 3265:

Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles

2866:

without bastardising or murdering the diacritics. --

455:. If you would like to participate, you can improve 1614:(e.g. mainstream sportswriting, in this case) for 293:– to be used as examples for ideal page structures 3118:to your sandpit and please beat the horse there. 2844:suggests the use of "better known in English as" 1687:, without the diaeresis, they should be taken to 3260:Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles 2823:, English Knowledge (XXG) is about recognizing 1654:stop wasting all our readers' and editors' time 1825:Spanish-language web sites prefixed with "es" 1699:editing that serves no purpose other than to 941:Re: nonsense "known professionally as" clause 851:Comment - the above contains a misreading of 771:, diacritic warrior, move it where he likes? 8: 1875:that nothing proves that 'Facundo Argüello' 2300:if it's true, would be true in any language 1990:is what I suggested, and I stand by it. -- 1631:stop making everyone else's more difficult 514: 395: 253:Here are some tasks awaiting attention: 203: 100: 72: 2647:It's interesting that "commonly rendered 2572:. But&nbsp:the results are the same: 2159:reliable sources spell the name that way 1717:without anyone losing their head over it 3028:Knowledge (XXG) talk:WikiProject Poland 2988:user page, and may adopt it myself ;-). 1286:known in diacritic-disabled sources as 792:party of being a diacritic warrior). I 516: 397: 102: 2310:", or something similar, wouldn't it? 1867:Fine application of the fudged (IMHO) 1610:. This is a classic case of mistaking 1554:Category:Serbian female tennis players 589:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Biography 477:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Argentina 7: 3270:Sports and games work group articles 1558:Category:Serbian male tennis players 704:The result of the move request was: 565:This article is within the scope of 365:Tag more articles with our standard 148:This article is within the scope of 3220:Biography articles of living people 2513:. His attitude can be summed up as 667:on 26 February 2012. The result of 91:It is of interest to the following 2912:written in English with diacritics 2615:Seven Wonders of the Ancient World 2566:the soccer player by the same name 1616:English-language style authorities 170:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Tennis 25: 3245:Low-importance Argentine articles 1801:failed recently to find consensus 2544:are the one who are saying that 1823:the word "tenis", (3) eliminate 1799:global consensus on the wording 1473:Whilst project-wide consistency 656: 616: 552: 542: 518: 430: 420: 399: 244: 135: 125: 104: 73: 32:This article must adhere to the 2538:no reputable sources in English 1126:does not apply here – nor does 796:interested in accurate titles. 663:This article was nominated for 632:the sports and games work group 497:This article has been rated as 190:This article has been rated as 3275:WikiProject Biography articles 3250:WikiProject Argentina articles 3230:Low-importance tennis articles 1606:This is adequately covered at 1455:known in the BBC's webpage as 800:is the more accurate surname. 767:. Should we vote, or just let 592:Template:WikiProject Biography 480:Template:WikiProject Argentina 308:and expand it, or peruse the 18:Talk:Facundo Arguello (tennis) 1: 3255:Stub-Class biography articles 3240:Stub-Class Argentine articles 3167:06:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC) 3148:06:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3128:06:25, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3072:05:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3048:03:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC) 3005:17:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 2950:earlier-version autobiography 2928:17:56, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2897:05:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2879:05:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2854:03:29, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2814:02:05, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2791:01:34, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2772:01:23, 17 November 2012 (UTC) 2746:23:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2730:21:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2688:20:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2661:18:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2643:18:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2628:17:42, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2605:15:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2586:11:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC) 2560:14:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2532:10:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2511:equally applicable to himself 2500:03:29, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2478:03:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2448:02:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2394:01:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2364:01:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC) 2345:22:52, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2330:22:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2269:14:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2246:07:50, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2224:03:00, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2209:If you do a little research: 2201:01:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC) 2173:22:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2151:18:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2135:14:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2095:12:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2065:11:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2022:10:50, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 2003:08:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 1979:07:34, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 1960:07:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 1931:07:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 1921:Knowledge (XXG) environment. 1908:reputable sources—especially 1892:06:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC) 1863:18:31, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1810:17:38, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1791:02:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1763:01:44, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1680:11:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1588:20:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1571:01:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC) 1535:11:27, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1513:10:37, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1491:08:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1469:07:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1435:05:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1416:02:03, 12 November 2012 (UTC) 1387:19:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1351:18:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1332:15:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1317:03:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC) 1254:08:46, 11 November 2012 (UTC) 1184:19:10, 6 November 2012‎ (UTC) 629:This article is supported by 164:and see a list of open tasks. 35:biographies of living persons 3134:Knowledge (XXG) title," per 2314:Now, has anyone seen that – 1219:22:27, 9 November 2012 (UTC) 1157:15:16, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1098:Argentine Tennis Association 1044:00:39, 6 November 2012 (UTC) 1021:21:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 1002:12:09, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 983:10:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 967:09:29, 5 November 2012 (UTC) 577:contribute to the discussion 3235:WikiProject Tennis articles 1705:anti-diacritics campaigning 1307:where the subject started. 1199:it must stay in the article 173:Template:WikiProject Tennis 47:must be removed immediately 3291: 3225:Stub-Class tennis articles 3098:or at the very least take 2012:issue. Thanks by the way. 1918:Knowledge (XXG) guidelines 1612:topically-specific sources 810:12:40, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 781:10:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC) 759:15:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC) 503:project's importance scale 196:project's importance scale 2155:It's surely obvious that 1778:you yourself have created 1709:Facundo Argüello (soccer) 1620:use the proper diacritics 917:11:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 873:09:25, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 843:09:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC) 739:Facundo Argüello (soccer) 731:Facundo Argüello (tennis) 727:Facundo Arguello (tennis) 721:11:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC) 708:Facundo Argüello (tennis) 612: 537: 496: 457:Facundo Argüello (tennis) 415: 202: 189: 120: 99: 3205:02:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC) 3034:professionally known as 931:Please do not modify it. 696:Please do not modify it. 443:This article is part of 745:César Chávez and Title 375:ATP and WTA tournament. 2825:today's majority usage 1701:make a pet-peeve point 1627:Get on with your lives 1447:known in USA Today as 609: 81:This article is rated 2954:he's in Playboy even! 2120:Google isn't research 1829:Argentine suffix "ar" 1373:Why do we still have 608: 568:WikiProject Biography 446:WikiProject Argentina 264:Take an item off the 85:on Knowledge (XXG)'s 2516:"it must stay there" 1727:individuals who are 1650:go do something else 1543:Gaj's Latin alphabet 1339:Talk:Dominik Halmosi 992:is not "censoring". 673:nomination withdrawn 2938:here—autobiography! 2547:"it must stay here" 2520:because he likes it 1711:exists, along with 749:Søren Kierkegaard. 3173:User:HandsomeFella 3155:Talk:Gérard Solvès 3108:Chloë Grace Moretz 2840:only in the lede. 2462:"Walensa" is wrong 1501:WP:TENNISNAMES RfC 1497:WP:TENNISNAMES RfC 1441:WP:TENNISNAMES RfC 1305:WP:TENNISNAMES RfC 1300:WP:TENNISNAMES RfC 1296:WP:TENNISNAMES RfC 857:Talk:Stephane Huet 610: 595:biography articles 483:Argentine articles 151:WikiProject Tennis 87:content assessment 3083: 2958:another by Walesa 2877: 2812: 2770: 2673:name was spelled 2498: 2468:Knowledge (XXG)? 2458:reputable sources 2446: 2392: 2244: 2199: 2133: 2001: 1958: 1890: 1760: 1707:. The fact that 1677: 1533: 1489: 1449:Francois Hollande 1445:François Hollande 1414: 679: 678: 651: 650: 647: 646: 643: 642: 513: 512: 509: 508: 394: 393: 390: 389: 386: 385: 382: 381: 67: 66: 16:(Redirected from 3282: 3189:User:Ohconfucius 3177:User:SMcCandlish 3077: 3036:Charlotte Bronte 3032:Charlotte Brontë 2876: 2873: 2867: 2811: 2808: 2802: 2779:English alphabet 2769: 2766: 2760: 2675:Facundo Arguello 2497: 2494: 2488: 2445: 2442: 2436: 2391: 2388: 2382: 2304:Facundo Arguello 2243: 2240: 2234: 2198: 2195: 2189: 2132: 2129: 2123: 2116:Plus rien à dire 2077:should give the 2000: 1997: 1991: 1957: 1954: 1948: 1889: 1886: 1880: 1761: 1756: 1755: 1753: 1685:Facundo Arguello 1678: 1673: 1672: 1670: 1532: 1529: 1523: 1488: 1485: 1479: 1457:Charlotte Bronte 1453:Charlotte Brontë 1413: 1410: 1404: 933: 698: 660: 653: 626: 621: 620: 619: 597: 596: 593: 590: 587: 573:join the project 562: 560:Biography portal 557: 556: 555: 546: 539: 538: 533: 531:Sports and Games 522: 515: 485: 484: 481: 478: 475: 440: 438:Argentina portal 435: 434: 433: 424: 417: 416: 411: 403: 396: 367:project template 310:List of articles 248: 241: 240: 204: 178: 177: 174: 171: 168: 145: 140: 139: 129: 122: 121: 116: 108: 101: 84: 78: 77: 69: 55:this noticeboard 27: 21: 3290: 3289: 3285: 3284: 3283: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3210: 3209: 3181:User:Joe Decker 3116:Renée Zellweger 3104:Beyoncé Knowles 3087:But LittleBenW, 2871: 2868: 2806: 2803: 2764: 2761: 2757:Hobson's choice 2492: 2489: 2440: 2437: 2386: 2383: 2238: 2235: 2193: 2190: 2127: 2124: 1995: 1992: 1952: 1949: 1884: 1881: 1751: 1746: 1740: 1668: 1663: 1657: 1556:contains none, 1527: 1524: 1483: 1480: 1408: 1405: 943: 938: 929: 823:Tennis Magazine 694: 684: 622: 617: 615: 594: 591: 588: 585: 584: 558: 553: 551: 528: 482: 479: 476: 473: 472: 436: 431: 429: 409: 378: 363:of the project. 266:Cleanup listing 239: 176:tennis articles 175: 172: 169: 166: 165: 141: 134: 114: 82: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3288: 3286: 3278: 3277: 3272: 3267: 3262: 3257: 3252: 3247: 3242: 3237: 3232: 3227: 3222: 3212: 3211: 3208: 3207: 3131: 3130: 3091: 3088: 3075: 3074: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 2989: 2962:by his brother 2930: 2899: 2882: 2881: 2863:an observation 2857: 2856: 2828: 2816: 2774: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2704: 2703: 2702: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2645: 2630: 2589: 2588: 2562: 2503: 2502: 2481: 2480: 2451: 2450: 2396: 2367: 2366: 2352:Walesa article 2319: 2308:Jorgen Windahl 2295: 2279:Jörgen Windahl 2272: 2271: 2249: 2248: 2227: 2226: 2204: 2203: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2108: 2107: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2067: 2025: 2024: 2006: 2005: 1982: 1981: 1963: 1962: 1934: 1933: 1914:article titles 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1832: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1793: 1766: 1765: 1723:by one or two 1718: 1714: 1691:for blatantly 1682: 1639:anti-diacritic 1625: 1621: 1617: 1613: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1419: 1418: 1389: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1208: 1204: 1193: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1132: 1131: 1124:WP:IDONTLIKEIT 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1024: 1023: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 986: 985: 942: 939: 937: 936: 926:requested move 920: 919: 878: 877: 876: 875: 846: 845: 827:Tennis Live UK 812: 783: 735:WP:CONSISTENCY 724: 702: 701: 691:requested move 685: 683: 682:Requested move 680: 677: 676: 669:the discussion 661: 649: 648: 645: 644: 641: 640: 637:Low-importance 628: 627: 611: 601: 600: 598: 564: 563: 547: 535: 534: 523: 511: 510: 507: 506: 499:Low-importance 495: 489: 488: 486: 442: 441: 425: 413: 412: 410:Low‑importance 404: 392: 391: 388: 387: 384: 383: 380: 379: 377: 376: 370: 364: 359:*Sign up as a 351: 332: 323:Add photos to 313: 294: 268: 252: 250: 249: 238: 237: 232: 227: 222: 216: 213: 212: 200: 199: 192:Low-importance 188: 182: 181: 179: 162:the discussion 147: 146: 130: 118: 117: 115:Low‑importance 109: 97: 96: 90: 79: 65: 64: 60:this help page 44:poorly sourced 30: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3287: 3276: 3273: 3271: 3268: 3266: 3263: 3261: 3258: 3256: 3253: 3251: 3248: 3246: 3243: 3241: 3238: 3236: 3233: 3231: 3228: 3226: 3223: 3221: 3218: 3217: 3215: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3197:In ictu oculi 3194: 3190: 3186: 3185:User:Jevansen 3182: 3178: 3174: 3171: 3170: 3169: 3168: 3164: 3160: 3156: 3150: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3120:In ictu oculi 3117: 3113: 3112:Chloë Sevigny 3109: 3105: 3101: 3100:Chloë Sevigny 3097: 3092: 3089: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3081: 3080:edit conflict 3073: 3069: 3065: 3060: 3056: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3040:In ictu oculi 3037: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3021: 3006: 3002: 2998: 2994: 2990: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2929: 2925: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2911: 2905: 2900: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2880: 2875: 2874: 2864: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2838: 2834: 2829: 2826: 2822: 2817: 2815: 2810: 2809: 2799: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2783:Fyunck(click) 2780: 2775: 2773: 2768: 2767: 2758: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2743: 2739: 2734: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2722:Fyunck(click) 2689: 2685: 2681: 2680:HandsomeFella 2676: 2671: 2668: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2644: 2640: 2636: 2635:Fyunck(click) 2631: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2607: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2597:HandsomeFella 2593: 2592: 2591: 2590: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524:HandsomeFella 2521: 2518: 2517: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2505: 2504: 2501: 2496: 2495: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2482: 2479: 2475: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2449: 2444: 2443: 2434: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2397: 2395: 2390: 2389: 2380: 2376: 2375:fact-checking 2371: 2370: 2369: 2368: 2365: 2361: 2357: 2353: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2342: 2338: 2337:Fyunck(click) 2333: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2322:HandsomeFella 2320: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2296: 2292: 2288: 2287:Anders Järryd 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2273: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2257: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2247: 2242: 2241: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2202: 2197: 2196: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2174: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2143:Fyunck(click) 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2131: 2130: 2121: 2117: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2066: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2045: 2044:article title 2041: 2037: 2033: 2029: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2014:Fyunck(click) 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2004: 1999: 1998: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1980: 1976: 1972: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1964: 1961: 1956: 1955: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1932: 1928: 1924: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1903: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1893: 1888: 1887: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1851: 1846: 1845: 1844: 1838: 1833: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1818: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1808: 1806: 1802: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1783:In ictu oculi 1779: 1774: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1764: 1759: 1749: 1745: 1744: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1716: 1712: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1681: 1676: 1666: 1662: 1661: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1640: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1580:Fyunck(click) 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1563:In ictu oculi 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1531: 1530: 1521: 1520:Novak Đoković 1516: 1515: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1505:In ictu oculi 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1486: 1476: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1461:In ictu oculi 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1432: 1428: 1427:Fyunck(click) 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1417: 1412: 1411: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1390: 1388: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1375:this nonsense 1372: 1371: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1343:In ictu oculi 1340: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1324:HandsomeFella 1320: 1319: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1309:In ictu oculi 1306: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1246:Fyunck(click) 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211:HandsomeFella 1209: 1205: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1176:Fyunck(click) 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1149:HandsomeFella 1146: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1129: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1078: 1074: 1069: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1036:Fyunck(click) 1033: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013:HandsomeFella 1009: 1008: 1003: 999: 995: 994:HandsomeFella 990: 989: 988: 987: 984: 980: 976: 975:Fyunck(click) 971: 970: 969: 968: 964: 960: 959:HandsomeFella 955: 952: 948: 940: 935: 932: 927: 922: 921: 918: 914: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 890: 887: 883: 880: 879: 874: 870: 866: 865:In ictu oculi 862: 861:WP:DIACRITICS 858: 854: 853:WP:DIACRITICS 850: 849: 848: 847: 844: 840: 836: 835:Fyunck(click) 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 813: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 784: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 763: 762: 761: 760: 756: 752: 751:In ictu oculi 748: 744: 740: 736: 732: 728: 723: 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 700: 697: 692: 687: 686: 681: 674: 670: 666: 662: 659: 655: 654: 638: 635:(assessed as 634: 633: 625: 624:Sports portal 614: 607: 603: 602: 599: 582: 581:documentation 578: 574: 570: 569: 561: 550: 548: 545: 541: 540: 536: 532: 527: 524: 521: 517: 504: 500: 494: 491: 490: 487: 470: 469: 464: 463: 458: 454: 453: 448: 447: 439: 428: 426: 423: 419: 418: 414: 408: 405: 402: 398: 374: 368: 362: 358: 356: 352: 349: 345: 341: 339: 338: 333: 330: 329:Tennis people 326: 322: 320: 319: 314: 311: 307: 306:Start article 303: 301: 300: 295: 292: 291:Justine Henin 288: 284: 280: 279:Roger Federer 277: 275: 274: 269: 267: 263: 261: 260: 255: 254: 251: 247: 243: 242: 236: 233: 231: 228: 226: 223: 221: 218: 217: 215: 214: 210: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 187: 184: 183: 180: 163: 159: 158: 153: 152: 144: 143:Tennis portal 138: 133: 131: 128: 124: 123: 119: 113: 110: 107: 103: 98: 94: 88: 80: 76: 71: 70: 62: 61: 56: 52: 48: 45: 41: 37: 36: 31: 29: 28: 19: 3151: 3132: 3076: 3035: 3031: 3017: 2909: 2904:Ilie Năstase 2872:Ohconfucius 2870: 2862: 2836: 2832: 2807:Ohconfucius 2805: 2797: 2765:Ohconfucius 2763: 2751: 2718: 2674: 2648: 2573: 2564:To research 2546: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2515: 2514: 2493:Ohconfucius 2491: 2465: 2457: 2441:Ohconfucius 2439: 2413:Lech Walensa 2387:Ohconfucius 2385: 2378: 2315: 2312:Wouldn't it? 2311: 2307: 2303: 2299: 2291:Ilie Năstase 2255: 2239:Ohconfucius 2237: 2194:Ohconfucius 2192: 2179: 2160: 2156: 2128:Ohconfucius 2126: 2115: 2113: 2079:correct name 2078: 2039: 2035: 2031: 1996:Ohconfucius 1994: 1953:Ohconfucius 1951: 1944: 1940: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1885:Ohconfucius 1883: 1876: 1848: 1841: 1840: 1836: 1820: 1797: 1777: 1741: 1658: 1528:Ohconfucius 1526: 1484:Ohconfucius 1482: 1474: 1456: 1448: 1409:Ohconfucius 1407: 1292:WP:STAGENAME 1287: 1283: 1198: 1197: 1144: 1143:And please, 1076: 956: 950: 944: 930: 923: 900: 881: 831:Getty Images 814: 797: 793: 789: 785: 764: 725: 705: 703: 695: 688: 672: 630: 566: 498: 467: 461: 450: 444: 354: 353: 335: 334: 316: 315: 297: 296: 287:Rafael Nadal 283:Leander Paes 271: 270: 257: 256: 191: 155: 149: 93:WikiProjects 58: 46: 39: 33: 3136:MOS:INFOBOX 2986:User:WojPob 2982:User:WojPob 2970:yet another 2934:Lech Wałęsa 2433:Lech walęsa 2429:Lech Wa³êsa 2425:Lech walesa 2409:Lech Walesa 1869:Google test 1743:SMcCandlish 1737:WP:BOLLOCKS 1693:tendentious 1660:SMcCandlish 1642:campaigning 1096:. It's the 743:WP:OPENPARA 3214:Categories 2978:competence 2908:virtually 2283:Björn Borg 2161:in English 1805:j⚛e decker 1697:disruptive 1635:jingoistic 1401:verifiable 1190:Björn Borg 1128:WP:ILIKEIT 1073:verifiable 468:to do list 346:up to our 83:Stub-class 3064:LittleBen 2997:LittleBen 2993:John Paul 2920:LittleBen 2889:LittleBen 2846:LittleBen 2837:primarily 2833:primarily 2738:bobrayner 2653:LittleBen 2620:LittleBen 2578:LittleBen 2576:. Zilch. 2552:LittleBen 2470:LittleBen 2421:Lech Wasa 2379:Newsnight 2356:LittleBen 2261:LittleBen 2216:LittleBen 2165:LittleBen 2087:LittleBen 2057:LittleBen 2032:Sometimes 1971:LittleBen 1923:LittleBen 1855:LittleBen 1843:unethical 1733:WP:TENNIS 1725:WP:TENNIS 1713:thousands 1703:of their 1689:WP:ARBCOM 1379:bobrayner 1288:Zoe Baird 1284:Zoë Baird 802:bobrayner 706:moved to 586:Biography 526:Biography 474:Argentina 452:Argentina 407:Argentina 348:standards 51:libellous 3159:Jevansen 3140:Kauffner 3024:WP:TROLL 2974:Newsweek 2914:. Quote 2798:only one 2752:actually 2487:here? -- 1773:WP:OWNER 1758:Contrib. 1675:Contrib. 1624:Feel it. 1393:to imply 1057:default. 1032:Arguello 889:spelling 798:Argüello 773:Kauffner 769:UtherSRG 713:Favonian 665:deletion 373:Open Era 342:Bring a 331:articles 273:Copyedit 2670:The RfC 2466:English 2405:Walensa 2377:as the 2040:usually 1941:without 1721:trolled 1397:neutral 903:") and 886:correct 882:Support 765:Comment 501:on the 462:sign up 304:Grab a 259:Cleanup 225:history 207:Tennis 194:on the 3055:WP:BLP 2966:by him 2916:Fyunck 2842:WP:BLP 2649:Walesa 2417:Wałęsa 2401:Walesa 2399:name: 2051:. The 2038:(even 2036:always 1608:WP:SSF 1475:may be 1145:please 951:Sergio 947:Fyunck 909:Prolog 897:WP:BLP 884:. The 829:, and 815:Oppose 361:member 325:Tennis 299:Expand 167:Tennis 157:tennis 112:Tennis 89:scale. 3020:WP:RS 2910:never 2256:never 2053:title 1877:isn't 1873:above 1748:Talk⇒ 1665:Talk⇒ 1648:, or 1633:with 945:User 901:right 893:WP:UE 790:other 747:WP:UE 737:with 459:, or 355:Other 337:Stubs 318:Photo 235:purge 230:watch 209:To-do 3201:talk 3163:talk 3144:talk 3124:talk 3068:talk 3044:talk 3001:talk 2946:here 2942:here 2924:talk 2893:talk 2850:talk 2831:not 2787:talk 2759:. -- 2742:talk 2726:talk 2684:talk 2657:talk 2639:talk 2624:talk 2601:talk 2582:talk 2556:talk 2528:talk 2474:talk 2360:talk 2341:talk 2326:talk 2316:ever 2289:and 2265:talk 2220:talk 2169:talk 2147:talk 2091:talk 2061:talk 2049:here 2018:talk 1988:This 1975:talk 1945:This 1927:talk 1859:talk 1850:here 1787:talk 1739:. — 1656:. — 1652:and 1629:and 1584:talk 1567:talk 1509:talk 1465:talk 1431:talk 1403:. -- 1399:and 1383:talk 1347:talk 1328:talk 1313:talk 1250:talk 1215:talk 1180:talk 1153:talk 1106:this 1104:and 1102:this 1094:here 1077:with 1040:talk 1017:talk 998:talk 979:talk 963:talk 913:talk 905:WP:V 869:talk 839:talk 819:ESPN 806:talk 786:Move 777:talk 755:talk 717:talk 671:was 575:and 344:Stub 220:edit 3157:). 3059:BLP 2906:is 2821:BLP 2611:BLP 2542:you 2073:or 1912:in 1910:not 1906:any 1821:not 1750:ɖ∘¿ 1667:ɖ∘¿ 928:. 493:Low 327:or 186:Low 40:BLP 3216:: 3203:) 3195:. 3187:, 3183:, 3179:, 3175:, 3165:) 3146:) 3138:. 3126:) 3114:, 3110:, 3106:, 3102:, 3070:) 3046:) 3003:) 2972:, 2968:, 2964:, 2960:, 2956:, 2952:, 2948:, 2944:, 2940:, 2926:) 2895:) 2852:) 2801:-- 2789:) 2744:) 2728:) 2686:) 2659:) 2641:) 2626:) 2603:) 2584:) 2558:) 2530:) 2522:. 2476:) 2431:, 2427:, 2423:, 2419:, 2415:, 2411:, 2407:, 2403:, 2362:) 2343:) 2328:) 2285:, 2267:) 2222:) 2171:) 2157:no 2149:) 2093:) 2063:) 2020:) 1977:) 1929:) 1861:) 1853:. 1789:) 1695:, 1637:, 1586:) 1569:) 1546:Dj 1511:) 1467:) 1433:) 1385:) 1349:) 1330:) 1315:) 1252:) 1217:) 1182:) 1155:) 1042:) 1019:) 1000:) 981:) 965:) 915:) 871:) 841:) 825:, 821:, 808:) 794:am 779:) 757:) 729:→ 719:) 711:. 693:. 639:). 529:: 289:, 285:, 281:, 3199:( 3161:( 3142:( 3122:( 3082:) 3078:( 3066:( 3042:( 2999:( 2922:( 2891:( 2848:( 2785:( 2740:( 2724:( 2682:( 2655:( 2637:( 2622:( 2599:( 2580:( 2554:( 2526:( 2472:( 2358:( 2339:( 2324:( 2263:( 2218:( 2167:( 2145:( 2089:( 2059:( 2030:" 2016:( 1973:( 1925:( 1857:( 1785:( 1754:þ 1752:¤ 1671:þ 1669:¤ 1582:( 1565:( 1550:Đ 1548:/ 1507:( 1463:( 1429:( 1381:( 1345:( 1326:( 1311:( 1248:( 1213:( 1178:( 1151:( 1130:. 1108:. 1038:( 1015:( 996:( 977:( 961:( 911:( 867:( 837:( 804:( 775:( 753:( 715:( 675:. 583:. 505:. 471:. 369:. 357:: 350:. 340:: 321:: 312:. 302:: 276:: 262:: 211:: 198:. 95:: 63:. 38:( 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index