84:
22:
74:
53:
225:
I'm very suspicious of this entire entry: the Codex
Seraphinianus and Voynich Manuscript each may or may not be fake, but there's currently no way of knowing. Moreover, the phrase "false writing system" seems to exist only in this Knowledge (XXG) page and other pages derived from it. As such, I can't
210:
There are 'writing systems and codes/ciphers which are established and generally accepted' of varying ages (modern ones would include road signs, scientific-mathematical systems, written Morse code and possibly even
Klingon). there are 'background texts/necessary documents within stories (treasure
241:
The author of the Codex
Seraphinianus said it was just an artistic work and the language contained in it is not real. The Voynich Manuscript still remains a complete mystery, though. As to the article's concern: yes, it is poorly written and unsourced. But the concept it is trying to explain
300:
The article doesn't refer to anything, gives unsourced comments and opinions, and doesn't obviously add anything useful to the topics of cryptographic writing and/or asemic writing. Hence I still think deleting it would be a genuinely better outcome than merging.
211:
maps being a prime example) and artistic and other constructs, and 'things which are meant to deceive for malicious purposes.' Presumably the intent of the article is to cover the latter uses and to create a listing.
148:
334:
329:
138:
114:
110:
97:
58:
196:
278:
I also endorse this merger. This article is only a poorly written stub-class that carries no relevance on its own. Merging it with
186:
alphabets are "artificially constructed". One does not, after all, find them growing from trees, or lying around on beaches.
33:
102:
39:
246:
is an example). I would both rewrite the article and search for sources, but deleting? I wouldn't do that. -
289:
21:
192:
200:
306:
231:
216:
302:
227:
284:
167:
269:
251:
242:
certainly exists: writing systems with no meaning are used in comics and many artistic works (
171:
212:
83:
279:
261:
243:
106:
105:
interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to
89:
323:
226:
help but feeling that this page is itself some kind of fake. Proposed for deletion.
265:
247:
189:
The definition of "false writing system" given in this article makes no sense.
310:
295:
273:
255:
235:
220:
204:
109:
on
Knowledge (XXG). If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
79:
166:
As far as I know, it's not definitively known that the writing in the
73:
52:
264:. This article discuss about the same thing the longer one does. -
15:
285:
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge (XXG)'s
8:
282:may provide more context for this article.
123:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Writing systems
190:
47:
260:I suggest this article to be merged into
95:This redirect falls within the scope of
49:
335:Low-importance Writing system articles
330:Redirect-Class Writing system articles
19:
7:
126:Template:WikiProject Writing systems
38:It is of interest to the following
14:
143:This redirect has been rated as
82:
72:
51:
20:
1:
182:To the best of my knowledge,
170:is a false writing system. --
98:WikiProject Writing systems
351:
205:23:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
149:project's importance scale
311:22:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
296:01:44, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
142:
67:
46:
274:21:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
256:19:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
236:19:16, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
221:10:38, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
174:07:56 Oct 5, 2002 (UTC)
113:and/or leave a query at
129:Writing system articles
115:the project’s talk page
168:Voynich Manuscript
34:content assessment
207:
195:comment added by
163:
162:
159:
158:
155:
154:
342:
294:
287:
131:
130:
127:
124:
121:
111:the project page
92:
87:
86:
76:
69:
68:
63:
55:
48:
25:
24:
16:
350:
349:
345:
344:
343:
341:
340:
339:
320:
319:
283:
180:
128:
125:
122:
120:Writing systems
119:
118:
107:writing systems
88:
81:
61:
59:Writing systems
12:
11:
5:
348:
346:
338:
337:
332:
322:
321:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
280:Asemic writing
276:
262:asemic writing
244:asemic writing
179:
176:
165:
161:
160:
157:
156:
153:
152:
145:Low-importance
141:
135:
134:
132:
94:
93:
90:Writing portal
77:
65:
64:
62:Low‑importance
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
347:
336:
333:
331:
328:
327:
325:
312:
308:
304:
299:
298:
297:
293:
292:
288:
286:Tseung Kwan O
281:
277:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
240:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
223:
222:
218:
214:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
187:
185:
178:"Artificial"?
177:
175:
173:
169:
150:
146:
140:
137:
136:
133:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
91:
85:
80:
78:
75:
71:
70:
66:
60:
57:
54:
50:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
23:
18:
17:
290:
224:
209:
197:74.95.43.249
191:— Preceding
188:
183:
181:
164:
144:
96:
40:WikiProjects
29:
303:Nickpelling
228:Nickpelling
213:Jackiespeel
103:WikiProject
324:Categories
291:Let's talk
193:unsigned
30:redirect
266:Alumnum
248:Alumnum
147:on the
36:scale.
172:Brion
28:This
307:talk
270:talk
252:talk
232:talk
217:talk
201:talk
101:, a
184:all
139:Low
326::
309:)
272:)
254:)
234:)
219:)
203:)
305:(
268:(
250:(
230:(
215:(
199:(
151:.
117:.
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
