646:, his "Xing Ye" nickname appears only in the infobox on his article. There is nothing in the links you provided so far which shows that being called "Ye" is a supreme honour for a celebrity in a Chinese-speaking entertainment industry. In other words, your assertion on the significance of being called "Ye" is groundless. Is it even comparable to an accomplished British entertainer receiving a knighthood? As I've mentioned above, I suggest moving the nickname to the infobox under the "Other names" field. It's clearly trivial and we shouldn't have an entire section in the article devoted to this.
330:
446:
428:
1722:
2796:
world terms. A reasonable reading of the situation may be that she had all her wealth confiscated and was banned from performing for several years in lieu of prison for a profoundly serious case of tax evasion. At present, this article reads as if the subject continues to be a highly active public personality, while the opposite is true. At the very least, the article needs substantial re-writing to reflect the correct tenses and to reflect the absolute silence and inactivity of the subject in recent years.
118:
736:爷 is a northern Chinese expression, just like 仔 is a southern Chinese expression. I wouldn't say it indicates a higher degree of respect, especially in this context since Fan is female, but it definitely shows affection and love, unlike Zhang Ziyi's seemingly neutral nickname of "International Zhang", which carries a sarcastic negative connotation. Fan originally didn't like the nickname, finding it odd, although she is now using it in her Weibo account to communicate with her fans.
320:
293:
593:, so I'm including them here. I feel that information on her nickname is trivial and shouldn't appear in the main text of the article, but what we currently have here is such information taking up an entire section. I'm not in favour of keeping it, but neither do I advocate erasing it completely. What I suggest is, we move the nickname to the infobox under the "Other names" field, with the supporting references, of course.
21:
517:
265:
496:
1279:
179:
151:
1291:
1273:
396:
109:
241:
1285:
1705:
1133:
1411:
give some problematic parts of the article here"However, as the company had yet to establish any branches in mainland China, many mainland
Chinese television advertising firms had to make calls" and a more generla problem I've had reading the article. I've re-written that part of my feeback, and am sorry if iI made some error.
189:
2795:
in 2018 surely requires much of the earlier part of this article to be re-written? Something extraordinary seems to have happened. The subject of this article seems to have gone from the most famous actress in China to literally completely inactive. The scale of the reported fine is extraordinary in
1410:
I'm sorry if I didn't follow the correct procedure I never intended to instantly fail the article more point out some anreas of improvment, This is my first attempt at reviewing as the instruction suggested that I should review an article after a nomination in order to clear up a back-log. I'll just
704:
fluent in
Chinese. You may have followed my suggestion to move the nickname to the infobox, but I'm still quite interested to know how the term "爷" is used in the Chinese-speaking entertainment circles. If anyone has come across any articles containing such information, please post a link here or on
1904:
Those reprimands and fines for publishing fake news and failing to fact check as recently as 2018 do not support the argument for reliability. “Improve censorship” does not mean improve reliability, in the context of China it means the opposite. At best you’re suggesting that Sina is only good some
1741:
Consensus only applies to one wikipedia at a time. None of those establish reliability, they just establish that it exists. This academic coverage suggests their coverage is not reliable at all “Independent commercial news portals or news sites such as Sina or
Tencent do not have the autonomy to
1387:
Are you sure you have the requisite experience to review a nomination and the requisite fluency in
English to judge the article's prose? It seems a bit strange that you're failing this based on its prose while your review contains numerous grammatical and spelling errors. That makes me wonder if
626:, mention nothing about "generous", "compassionate" or "strong-minded", nor anything about its use in Chinese-speaking entertainment circles. On closer inspection, I realise that the references on "Ye Men" (爷们) and "Chun Ye Men" (纯爷们) you provided are irrelevant because the focus is on "Ye".
670:
I'm afraid I don't, and I need a proper article on the uses of "爷" to enlighten me. To me, "爷" is not much different from other terms such as "仔", "哥" and "姐" used by the media and fans to refer to some celebrities, although it does indicate a higher degree of respect towards the person.
122:
1837:
It still appears that Esarey and Qiang supports the contention they were meant to support and their inference is not flawed at all, unless you have a reliable source with explicitly says Sina is reliable this discussion is over unless you want to take it to RsN.
1443:
I've been re-reading the requirments for a good article nomination and on reflection find the "problems" more just my own personal preference, I was unaware of options other than failing so if you can point me to a list of other options I would like to ammend my
1429:". I don't really see what's wrong with the sentence you're quoting. Could you explain? What's the "more general problem" you're referring to? Unless you're specific about these issues, it's going to be impossible for the nominator to address them.--
1947:
Thats good, I’m citing them as evidence of unreliability (specifically the
Southern Courier, that Nasdaq thing is an investment opinion piece not a news article). We seem to have a source that is unreliable as a matter of law and a matter of fact.
1654:
2851:
One of the most famous
Chinese actresses (at least prior to the tax evasion hiatus) and her alma mater has been wrong for 17 year on Knowledge... She was never in Shanghai Theatre Academy (上戏), but went to 上海谢晋-恒通明星学校.
862:
2925:
255:
2975:
1794:
From Esarey and Qiang "Laws require Web sites to reproduce content from official news organizations.” Its also not your place to describe articles in reputable peer reviewed journals as “highly suspect.”
1685:
It only has to be contested by one editor to require full verification, I’m that one editor. I see nothing about editorial independence or any indication of a reputation for reliability or fact checking.
1574:
Sina.com is used extensively as a source on this page however I can find nothing that says they’re generally reliable. Does anyone have any indication of their reliability? If not we have to remove them.
1331:
Very broad, covering almost all notable actions undertaken by the subject. Some details can use trimming as a lot of minute details is presented in an over-long way. The article could be made more concise
410:
2724:"We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a
1388:
you're fluent enough in
English to make that assessment. You don't give any examples of problematic language so your review isn't going to be of any help to the nominator. Have you had a look at the
2767:
Glad you accept the point about reliable sources on BLPs. I see no contradiction between my posts here and my post at RSN, you’re going to need to be specific about what you feel is contradictory.
2980:
2521:
sources not attributed to a 3rd party, and the lack of clarity on the degree of RS when Sina
Entertainment is being attributed, you will need to go back and manually review each of the sources,
2920:
2965:
2940:
1353:
The article's language could take another look again to try and comply with style guides but otherwise is worthy canidate for nomination that i'm sure will pass with just a little more work
405:
303:
1396:? I ask because it's not customary to immediately fail a nomination without giving the nominator a chance to address the issues you're raising unless the article has fundamental problems.--
2970:
2605:
Also just FYI this is the english language wikipedia, your suggestion that we are not allowed to use translation machines when evaluation non-english sources is preposterous and per
863:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140606224900/http://www.wnem.com/story/25658467/barbie-welcomes-internationally-renowned-actress-fan-bing-bing-to-shine-in-her-global-hall-of-fame-debut
2829:
I removed the comment from the lede suggesting Fan has not been active since the tax evasion incident in 2018, since she has subsequently starred in the
Hollywood movie "The 355".
2246:
1658:
2295:
you no longer consider Sina to be a reliable source in its own right. Per the consensus I will be removing Sina content that is not sourced from a WP:RS while leaving what is
2231:
A question on an article talk page is inherently about the context of that article which in this case is a BLP. Please tone it down a bit, your PA is unwelcome and offensive.
2905:
866:
88:
2245:^^Anybody else reading the entirety of the thread above (zero mentions of BLP or Fan herself until a dozen remarks in) will come to the conclusion that the above remark is "
2623:
You had a full 5 minutes to do that, and it is evident that you don't blink at persistent blanket reverts. As consensus has never been achieved on state sources other than
2388:. I trust you intend to remove these inadvertent additions? Also I see no indication of independence for Sina Entertainment and no such thing was mentioned at the WP:RS/N.
902:
2930:
2704:
1974:
2730:
unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.
1554:, so in the future please don't nominate articles unless you intend to actually follow up on the nomination. There are numerous unsourced statements in the article.--
2658:
exclusively besides for about self etc. If their is no consensus on their reliability they cant be used on BLP pages, thank you for admitting the lack of consensus.
892:
3010:
2960:
2935:
2751:
There you go again with the baiting, but I suppose that is secondhand nature. The contradiction is in reference to your post at the WP:RS/N thread, and that alone.
1389:
1171:
567:
557:
376:
818:
1064:
1060:
1046:
944:
940:
926:
2120:
Again, the caveats that IJOC (Esarey and Qiang) noted are more than sufficient refutations of your assertions. If others widely accepted them, there is no way
1425:
I appreciate your willingness to help out with the backlog. I assumed that you were failing the nomination because you wrote that "This article has failed its
1138:
3015:
2995:
2880:
1337:
Problematic, The language could less peacock and some of the information in the philanthropy section could be toned-down. Either way it's not a major problem
1161:
93:
2990:
2895:
250:
161:
76:) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
1032:
1637:
1542:
I'm going to close this nomination. This was a drive-by nomination by someone who didn't actually contribute to it and the nominator hasn't responded.
2910:
2890:
1458:
I would encourage you to list those problems. If the article uses peacock term or if there are inappropriate quotations, that needs to be addressed.--
533:
3005:
2955:
2950:
2900:
207:
68:
32:
1742:
produce original news content, and instead can only reprint news articles from state-run news outlets (Esarey and Qiang, 2011; Stockmann, 2011).”
2187:
If it makes you feel better open RfCs about Sina, First Monday, and Xinhua. Also keep in mind that this is a BLP and 2010 Shanghai fire is not.
2945:
2672:
CIR does not apply to languages BTW... Besides one, the english language. No other language is required to make any edit on english wikipedia.
2292:
386:
2875:
1712:
852:
2830:
867:
http://www.wnem.com/story/25658467/barbie-welcomes-internationally-renowned-actress-fan-bing-bing-to-shine-in-her-global-hall-of-fame-debut
524:
501:
211:
882:
2211:
Another red herring designed to derail this farcical "discussion". No mention has been made of RS in a specific BLP context, indeed your
903:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121103090909/http://www.karenruimy.com:80/blog/2012/07/04/fan-bingbing-in-stephane-rolland-couture-aw-2012/
3000:
2985:
2915:
2005:”, state media reported, in a rare public glimpse into controls over the press.” which as you can imagine is elaborated on in the text.
2001:’” and the subtitle is "China’s government has threatened to shut down Sina, one of the country’s most popular news websites unless it “
1361:
1325:
Accurate if a bit flowery, very well cited with numerous RS present for almost every claim. In text quotations are used
Inappropitatley.
1022:
2433:
Accurate if a bit flowery, very well cited with numerous RS present for almost every claim. In text quotations are used Inappropitatley
2455:
If you don’t think that the Sina News RfC includes Sina Entertainment would you be willing to start a new one for Sina Entertainment?
1872:
1426:
1357:
1305:
1143:
215:
52:
1887:
and Sina Weibo. The existence of a statute does not imply its universal (or even near-universal) enforcement, let alone compliance.
1393:
1042:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
922:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
912:
836:
206:, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Knowledge's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
2309:
Ok, I’ve gone through the nine Sina cites here and none is sourced a reputable news organization, do we have consensus to remove?
893:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120917001857/http://www.madametussauds.com:80/Shanghai/en/OurFigures/AsianFilmStars/FanBingBing.aspx
784:
462:
352:
2567:
citations. As to the other sources, your assertions are not supported anywhere, so if you persist, I will have no choice but to
819:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120615175551/http://www.tomandlorenzo.com:80/2012/06/werq-fan-bingbing-in-salvatore-ferragamo.html
2885:
1309:
1166:
872:
274:
202:
165:
156:
38:
2630:
The "This is English-language Knowledge" is a beyond-the-pale flippant remark in an incongruous context. The point is, if one
1880:
906:
2549:
is on you to prove the acceptability of the source. Since this is a BLP it stays off the page until you achieve consensus.
2360:
I do not see any such posts by him at WP:RS/N pertaining to Sina Entertainment itself. And you will have to do better than
2047:
Thats not the point, you said it was "some planet-axis-altering spin” when it was literally the title. Please retract your
1636:) and Sina (the parent company of the Sina news group) doing a deal... Here is english language coverage of the same thing
1210:
1319:
Generally quite good, some areas such as those mentioned below could use some stylistic improvement but no major problems
842:
622:
next time for the benefit of non-Chinese readers who are reading this. The dictionary definitions for "Ye" (爷), as given
1107:
987:
131:
1033:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130721031532/http://health.southcn.com/news/INews/content/2011-11/16/content_33286825.htm
896:
2145:
453:
433:
343:
298:
822:
351:
related articles on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
808:
2634:
to decipher the attributed source, perhaps one should not be predisposed to make any assessments of them at all.
1762:) do establish reliability, or else conspiracy theory sites such as Global Research would have much freer reign.
2027:
indeed make no such elaborations, it is a compilation of CAC threats; the only specific measure mentioned being
1923:, merely as evidence to bolster the fact they do not 100% "reproduce content from official news organizations".
1063:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
943:
to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
2834:
2772:
2757:
2742:
2713:
2677:
2663:
2640:
2614:
2596:
2581:
2554:
2531:
2508:
2494:
2460:
2393:
2370:
2351:
2333:
2314:
2300:
2282:
2259:
2236:
2221:
2192:
2178:
2154:
2094:
2075:
2056:
2037:
2010:
1987:
1953:
1937:
1910:
1893:
1876:
1843:
1827:
1800:
1784:
1749:
1731:
1691:
1675:
1644:
1618:
1580:
1036:
2517:
HEJ, I did not feel like responding to this thread, given priorities in real life, but given the presence of
2274:
1098:
1014:
978:
776:
715:
681:
656:
619:
603:
77:
1700:
The Chinese Knowledge community implicitly disagrees with you, so please desist with that line of thought.
2212:
2170:
1185:
1010:
445:
427:
2732:
Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing.” (highlights mine)
853:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130615063021/http://www.trends.com.cn:80/luxury/vision/2013-05/457009.shtml
2816:
2801:
2428:
2269:"on this page” is in the first sentence, your link of wikilawyering (actually that whole sentence) is a
1559:
1532:
1484:
1463:
1434:
1401:
1238:
1189:
1082:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
1070:
962:
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
950:
137:
43:
1013:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
883:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120531055010/http://chinatibetnews.com/news/2012-05/04/content_960322.htm
775:. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
1023:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120613014426/http://stylishthought.com/fashion/style-icon-fan-bingbing/
87:. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
737:
108:
2768:
2738:
2673:
2659:
2610:
2592:
2550:
2504:
2490:
2456:
2389:
2347:
2310:
2296:
2278:
2232:
2188:
2174:
2090:
2085:
Ok, lets jump straight back to the point then: we have a WP:RS that says that Sina doesn’t satisfy
2052:
2006:
1949:
1906:
1839:
1796:
1745:
1687:
1640:
1576:
886:
741:
1775:
1743:
856:
532:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
461:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2857:
2121:
913:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140514061346/http://www.afinance.cn/lc/czrs/mxlc/201212/519073.html
830:
796:
707:
673:
648:
595:
91:.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see
2469:
My comments in the RfC applies equally to Sina Entertainment. Some of the examples I gave (like
2346:
tracked down those all down, there was nothing unique under the Sina Entertainment sub-heading.
1237:
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article
1067:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
947:
before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
837:
http://kpopstyle.info/2012/10/07/fan-bing-bing-angelababy-attends-the-voice-of-china-finale.html
2627:(a low bar given its tabloid / op-ed repository), you are operating on contentious ground here.
2470:
1718:
1083:
963:
785:
https://web.archive.org/web/20110310214541/http://ent.cn.yahoo.com:80/ypen/20110303/238932.html
1978:
1498:
1449:
1416:
1369:
1260:
1250:
1204:
319:
292:
48:
1026:
2812:
2797:
2606:
2546:
2438:
2086:
1555:
1545:
1528:
1522:
1480:
1459:
1430:
1397:
873:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120912235502/http://roll.sohu.com:80/20110705/n312499265.shtml
194:
2728:. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is
1763:
1090:
970:
907:
http://www.karenruimy.com/blog/2012/07/04/fan-bingbing-in-stephane-rolland-couture-aw-2012/
2572:
1246:
627:
84:
916:
2202:
1049:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
929:, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by
529:
1089:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
969:
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
843:
https://web.archive.org/web/20130409234606/http://chinamuse.moet.com.cn:80/Index/index
2869:
2853:
2651:
2631:
2447:
links where the source is Sina Entertainment (and not an external source) itself, or
2385:
2364:, where removing 1) necessary formatting 2) a replacement for Baidu Baike, occurred.
2166:
2125:
1551:
1981:
to suggest Sina would "improve censorship". That is some planet-axis-altering spin.
1871:
You have appeared to ignore the caveat I quoted, in addition to the widely reported
897:
http://www.madametussauds.com/Shanghai/en/OurFigures/AsianFilmStars/FanBingBing.aspx
788:
642:
s in Chinese history were generous, compassionate and strong-minded? Speaking about
264:
2655:
2542:
2475:
2422:
2381:
2343:
2270:
2250:
2048:
1494:
1474:
1445:
1412:
1382:
1365:
1290:
1272:
1256:
1242:
1228:
1200:
1006:
802:
768:
643:
623:
335:
2575:
disruption campaign against mainland Chinese sources that are not to your liking.
1278:
823:
http://www.tomandlorenzo.com/2012/06/werq-fan-bingbing-in-salvatore-ferragamo.html
2473:) were from Sina Entertainment, which also aggregates from other news sources. —
1591:
876:
589:
There wasn't sufficient space for me to write my comments in the edit summary in
1056:
936:
516:
495:
2703:
Again, nothing supports that assertion. And it would be helpful if you did not
809:
http://www.webcitation.org/6QAjK85ux?url=http://www.hkfaa.com/winnerlist29.html
178:
150:
1717:, and theses from students at multiple reputable Western universities such as
1055:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
935:. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
325:
184:
1493:
sorry no, I don't think I have the time to learn how to do so at this moment.
1596:
1037:
http://health.southcn.com/news/INews/content/2011-11/16/content_33286825.htm
2591:
Thanks for doing Global Times, now do the rest besides Sina Entertainment.
1192:. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
846:
395:
2327:
by OP on Sina Entertainment, which is a different discussion altogether.
2139:
1527:
You nominated this article. Are you interested in continuing with this?--
812:
2518:
1284:
240:
2541:
You returned *every* source not just Sina Entertainment... We cant use
1308:. This is how the article, as of August 29, 2018, compares against the
1905:
of the time, when they’re breaking the law (which we cant tell btw).
1241:
in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for
2861:
2838:
2820:
2805:
2776:
2762:
2746:
2718:
2681:
2667:
2645:
2618:
2600:
2586:
2558:
2536:
2512:
2498:
2484:
2464:
2397:
2375:
2355:
2338:
2318:
2304:
2286:
2264:
2240:
2226:
2196:
2182:
2159:
2098:
2080:
2060:
2042:
2014:
1992:
1957:
1942:
1914:
1898:
1847:
1832:
1804:
1789:
1753:
1736:
1695:
1680:
1648:
1623:
1584:
1563:
1536:
1502:
1488:
1467:
1453:
1438:
1420:
1405:
1373:
1264:
1214:
1112:
992:
745:
722:
688:
663:
610:
214:. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
2209:
Also keep in mind that this is a BLP and 2010 Shanghai fire is not
1633:
458:
348:
2169:, also its not my assertion... Its an assertion made by a WP:RS (
2029:
several people posting content deemed untrue jailed in a campaign
1360:. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it
1253:
with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
2173:
is highly respected) and you have not adequately challenged it.
1997:
The headline of the piece is "China orders media giant Sina to ‘
887:
http://www.chinatibetnews.com/news/2012-05/04/content_960322.htm
857:
http://www.trends.com.cn/luxury/vision/2013-05/457009.shtml#n=1
1629:
102:
83:
from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
60:
15:
2215:
refers to the reliability of Sina in general, not just BLPs.
628:
Blogs and self-published media are not acceptable as sources
394:
263:
239:
41:
at the time (September 16, 2018). There are suggestions on
1929:, you ought to avoid strawmen as blatant as the ones above
1027:
http://stylishthought.com/fashion/style-icon-fan-bingbing/
1017:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
779:
for additional information. I made the following changes:
2926:
Mid-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
2380:
Your edit has restored a number of sources which are not
2811:
Tidied up as per comments at the edits on article page.
2654:, its limited to sources which there is a consensus are
2031:(referring to social media users and not news outlets).
1479:
Are you still planning on continuing with this review?--
2976:
High-importance Chinese-language entertainment articles
2444:
2361:
2324:
2205:
of quotes that are not to your liking isn't productive.
2133:
2066:
1926:
772:
590:
2019:
Yawn....the fallacy of article headlines versus text.
1343:
Yes, Few edit wars or even active editing of the page.
917:
http://www.afinance.cn/lc/czrs/mxlc/201212/519073.html
2293:
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#RfC:Sina.com
1612:
should follow general policy on social media usage.
1356:
When these issues are addressed, the article can be
528:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
457:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
347:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
2981:
WikiProject Chinese-language entertainment articles
2443:, who responded to the review. And, which is it, a
1249:. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to
1059:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
939:using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
2921:B-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
2275:Knowledge:Wikilawyering#Use and misuse of the term
2247:It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is
1925:As an aside, if you have any interest in avoiding
47:for improving the article. If you can improve it,
2966:B-Class China-related articles of High-importance
2941:Unknown-importance biography (musicians) articles
789:http://ent.cn.yahoo.com/ypen/20110303/238932.html
2419:If you will make that stance, you ought to ping
1809:Also from the same paragraph, a sentence later,
803:http://bjyouth.ynet.com/article.jsp?oid=18771860
2971:B-Class Chinese-language entertainment articles
2089:. Do you have any WP:RS which says otherwise?
1045:This message was posted before February 2018.
925:This message was posted before February 2018.
877:http://roll.sohu.com/20110705/n312499265.shtml
8:
1977:on the same episode; nor did they engage in
406:the Chinese-language entertainment taskforce
2384:and as such are inappropriate for use on a
1811:...although compliance is far from complete
2906:Knowledge level-5 vital articles in People
1121:
767:I have just modified 11 external links on
490:
422:
287:
145:
2931:Actors and filmmakers work group articles
1821:as suspect, so desist with the strawmen.
1817:as flawed is different from treating the
1236:
1005:I have just modified 2 external links on
2503:CA, do we have consensus to remove now?
2165:You are welcome to open a discussion at
1969:) made no comment on the reliability of
1669:reliability is not seriously contested.
1659:only instance of a RS/N discussion there
1223:
847:http://chinamuse.moet.com.cn/Index/index
2471:this attributes to International Online
1704:has appeared in the citation list of a
1152:
1124:
492:
424:
289:
147:
106:
3011:Low-importance Women in music articles
2961:High-importance China-related articles
2936:B-Class biography (musicians) articles
2448:
2432:
2208:
2028:
1920:
1810:
813:http://www.hkfaa.com/winnerlist29.html
2791:The lack of references since the tax
2489:Thanks for clearing that up MarkH21.
1379:I hope you don't mind if I chime in.
20:
7:
2136:at the time of GA review. Notifying
2067:further discussion-derailing tactics
1921:support the argument for reliability
1657:pages on Chinese Knowledge, and the
542:Knowledge:WikiProject Women in Music
522:This article is within the scope of
451:This article is within the scope of
341:This article is within the scope of
200:This article is within the scope of
3016:WikiProject Women in Music articles
2996:All WikiProject Women-related pages
2881:Biography articles of living people
2609:its your job to do that, not mine.
1919:I was not citing the reprimands to
1364:. Thank you for your work so far.—
545:Template:WikiProject Women in Music
136:It is of interest to the following
2991:B-Class WikiProject Women articles
2896:Knowledge vital articles in People
2571:for your well-documented, lengthy
1550:there's a considerable backlog at
14:
1927:uninvolved criticism such as this
1009:. Please take a moment to review
771:. Please take a moment to review
251:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
2911:B-Class vital articles in People
2891:Knowledge level-5 vital articles
2134:latter two-thirds of the reflist
1604:) is to be considered reliable.
1300:Failed "good article" nomination
1289:
1283:
1277:
1271:
515:
494:
444:
426:
328:
318:
291:
187:
177:
149:
116:
107:
66:This article must adhere to the
19:
3006:B-Class Women in music articles
2545:etc on a BLP, period. Also the
2124:or similar articles would pass
1766:make no such conclusions as to
1758:Yes, those sources (especially
562:This article has been rated as
381:This article has been rated as
224:Knowledge:WikiProject Biography
2956:B-Class China-related articles
2951:WikiProject Biography articles
2901:B-Class level-5 vital articles
2847:Wrong Information for 17 years
2431:for GA under "Verifiable?" as
2128:, given the heavy reliance on
2065:Absolutely not going to allow
1813:. And describing a particular
1776:Wang and Mark's own inferences
1564:01:51, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
620:write your comments in English
227:Template:WikiProject Biography
1:
2946:Musicians work group articles
2862:15:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
2707:from just a few weeks prior.
2449:no indication of independence
2445:post to not one, but multiple
2277:and I ask you to retract it.
1665:revolving around self-media,
1537:20:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
1503:03:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
1489:17:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
993:15:59, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
536:and see a list of open tasks.
465:and see a list of open tasks.
403:This article is supported by
355:and see a list of open tasks.
272:This article is supported by
248:This article is supported by
69:biographies of living persons
2876:Former good article nominees
2839:16:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
2821:14:13, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
2806:10:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
2525:using a Translator machine.
1304:This article has failed its
1113:16:16, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
212:contribute to the discussion
33:Media and drama good article
1468:09:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1454:09:26, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1439:09:09, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1421:08:53, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1406:08:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1374:08:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1265:08:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
1215:08:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
705:my talk page. Thank you.
471:Knowledge:WikiProject Women
361:Knowledge:WikiProject China
81:must be removed immediately
3032:
3001:WikiProject Women articles
2986:WikiProject China articles
2916:B-Class biography articles
2726:reliable, published source
2051:, I didn’t spin anything.
1774:specifically, thus making
1653:Given its usage in nearly
1335:4. Neutral point of view?:
1076:(last update: 5 June 2024)
1002:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
956:(last update: 5 June 2024)
764:Hello fellow Wikipedians,
723:15:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
689:16:32, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
664:15:51, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
568:project's importance scale
525:WikiProject Women in Music
477:WikiProject Women articles
474:Template:WikiProject Women
387:project's importance scale
364:Template:WikiProject China
37:, but it did not meet the
2777:17:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2763:17:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2747:17:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2719:17:16, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2682:17:11, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2668:17:10, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2646:17:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2619:17:02, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2601:17:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2587:16:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2559:16:52, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2537:16:40, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2513:18:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
2499:18:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
1310:six good article criteria
1270:
1245:-status according to the
1226:
746:19:52, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
611:03:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
561:
510:
439:
402:
380:
313:
271:
247:
172:
144:
2632:lacks the language skill
2485:19:49, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
2465:19:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
2398:19:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
2376:19:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
2356:18:54, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
2339:18:37, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
2319:16:50, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
2305:16:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
2287:05:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2265:03:28, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2241:03:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2227:03:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2197:02:52, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2183:02:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2160:02:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2146:the reviewer at the time
2099:02:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2081:02:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2061:02:03, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2043:01:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
2015:01:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1993:01:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1973:itself, and neither did
1958:01:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1943:01:35, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1915:01:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1899:01:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1848:01:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1833:01:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1805:01:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1790:00:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1754:00:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1737:00:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1723:University of Queensland
1696:00:33, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1681:00:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1649:00:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
1624:23:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
1585:23:25, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
1427:Good article nomination
1306:Good article nomination
998:External links modified
760:External links modified
548:Women in music articles
2886:B-Class vital articles
2171:First Monday (journal)
1329:3. Broad in coverage?:
399:
367:China-related articles
268:
244:
2429:reviewed this article
2132:sited sources in the
1632:(as in Microsoft not
1628:That source is about
1190:Talk:Fan Bingbing/GA1
630:. The sentence about
585:The nickname "Fan YE"
398:
275:WikiProject Musicians
267:
243:
203:WikiProject Biography
162:Actors and Filmmakers
123:level-5 vital article
39:good article criteria
2737:What contradiction?
1592:partnership with MSN
1057:regular verification
937:regular verification
2705:contradict yourself
2563:I just removed the
2203:persistent ignoring
2003:improves censorship
1047:After February 2018
927:After February 2018
29:was nominated as a
2519:Sina Entertainment
2251:wikilawyering-like
2122:2010 Shanghai fire
1999:improve censorship
1819:article as a whole
1602:Sina Entertainment
1394:guide to reviewing
1101:InternetArchiveBot
1052:InternetArchiveBot
981:InternetArchiveBot
932:InternetArchiveBot
400:
269:
245:
230:biography articles
132:content assessment
2787:Period since 2018
2760:
2716:
2643:
2584:
2534:
2480:
2373:
2336:
2262:
2224:
2157:
2078:
2040:
1990:
1940:
1930:
1896:
1830:
1787:
1734:
1678:
1621:
1317:1. Well written?:
1297:
1296:
1180:
1179:
1077:
957:
700:I never said I'm
582:
581:
578:
577:
574:
573:
489:
488:
485:
484:
454:WikiProject Women
421:
420:
417:
416:
344:WikiProject China
286:
285:
282:
281:
101:
100:
59:
58:
51:; it may then be
3023:
2756:
2754:
2712:
2710:
2639:
2637:
2580:
2578:
2569:report you again
2530:
2528:
2483:
2478:
2442:
2426:
2369:
2367:
2332:
2330:
2258:
2256:
2220:
2218:
2213:opening question
2153:
2151:
2143:
2074:
2072:
2036:
2034:
2021:Southern Courier
1986:
1984:
1963:Southern Courier
1936:
1934:
1924:
1892:
1890:
1881:Southern Courier
1826:
1824:
1783:
1781:
1778:highly suspect.
1764:Esarey and Qiang
1730:
1728:
1714:Science Magazine
1711:book as well as
1674:
1672:
1617:
1615:
1549:
1526:
1478:
1386:
1293:
1287:
1281:
1275:
1224:
1134:Copyvio detector
1122:
1111:
1102:
1075:
1074:
1053:
991:
982:
955:
954:
933:
834:
800:
721:
718:
712:
687:
684:
678:
662:
659:
653:
609:
606:
600:
591:this edit I made
550:
549:
546:
543:
540:
519:
512:
511:
506:
498:
491:
479:
478:
475:
472:
469:
448:
441:
440:
430:
423:
369:
368:
365:
362:
359:
338:
333:
332:
331:
322:
315:
314:
309:
306:
295:
288:
232:
231:
228:
225:
222:
208:join the project
197:
195:Biography portal
192:
191:
190:
181:
174:
173:
168:
153:
146:
129:
120:
119:
112:
111:
103:
89:this noticeboard
61:
23:
22:
16:
3031:
3030:
3026:
3025:
3024:
3022:
3021:
3020:
2866:
2865:
2849:
2789:
2752:
2708:
2635:
2576:
2526:
2481:
2474:
2436:
2420:
2365:
2328:
2254:
2216:
2149:
2137:
2070:
2032:
1982:
1932:
1888:
1822:
1779:
1726:
1670:
1613:
1572:
1543:
1520:
1472:
1390:GA instructions
1380:
1323:2. Verifiable?:
1302:
1232:
1222:
1184:This review is
1176:
1148:
1120:
1105:
1100:
1068:
1061:have permission
1051:
1015:this simple FaQ
1000:
985:
980:
948:
941:have permission
931:
828:
794:
777:this simple FaQ
762:
720:
716:
708:
706:
686:
682:
674:
672:
661:
657:
649:
647:
608:
604:
596:
594:
587:
547:
544:
541:
538:
537:
504:
476:
473:
470:
467:
466:
411:High-importance
383:High-importance
366:
363:
360:
357:
356:
334:
329:
327:
308:High‑importance
307:
301:
229:
226:
223:
220:
219:
193:
188:
186:
159:
130:on Knowledge's
127:
117:
44:the review page
12:
11:
5:
3029:
3027:
3019:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2868:
2867:
2848:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2831:148.197.44.214
2824:
2823:
2788:
2785:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2780:
2779:
2769:Horse Eye Jack
2758:leave language
2739:Horse Eye Jack
2734:
2733:
2714:leave language
2701:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2690:
2689:
2688:
2687:
2686:
2685:
2684:
2674:Horse Eye Jack
2670:
2660:Horse Eye Jack
2641:leave language
2628:
2611:Horse Eye Jack
2603:
2593:Horse Eye Jack
2582:leave language
2551:Horse Eye Jack
2532:leave language
2505:Horse Eye Jack
2501:
2491:Horse Eye Jack
2477:
2457:Horse Eye Jack
2417:
2416:
2415:
2414:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2406:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2390:Horse Eye Jack
2371:leave language
2348:Horse Eye Jack
2334:leave language
2311:Horse Eye Jack
2307:
2297:Horse Eye Jack
2289:
2279:Horse Eye Jack
2260:leave language
2233:Horse Eye Jack
2222:leave language
2206:
2189:Horse Eye Jack
2185:
2175:Horse Eye Jack
2155:leave language
2118:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2091:Horse Eye Jack
2076:leave language
2053:Horse Eye Jack
2038:leave language
2007:Horse Eye Jack
1988:leave language
1950:Horse Eye Jack
1938:leave language
1907:Horse Eye Jack
1894:leave language
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1840:Horse Eye Jack
1828:leave language
1797:Horse Eye Jack
1785:leave language
1746:Horse Eye Jack
1732:leave language
1688:Horse Eye Jack
1676:leave language
1641:Horse Eye Jack
1619:leave language
1590:They formed a
1577:Horse Eye Jack
1571:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1351:
1350:
1344:
1338:
1332:
1326:
1320:
1301:
1298:
1295:
1294:
1268:
1267:
1255:
1254:
1234:
1233:
1227:
1221:
1218:
1195:
1194:
1178:
1177:
1175:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1147:
1146:
1144:External links
1141:
1136:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1119:
1116:
1095:
1094:
1087:
1040:
1039:
1031:Added archive
1029:
1021:Added archive
999:
996:
975:
974:
967:
920:
919:
911:Added archive
909:
901:Added archive
899:
891:Added archive
889:
881:Added archive
879:
871:Added archive
869:
861:Added archive
859:
851:Added archive
849:
841:Added archive
839:
825:
817:Added archive
815:
807:Added archive
805:
791:
783:Added archive
761:
758:
757:
756:
755:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
714:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
680:
655:
602:
586:
583:
580:
579:
576:
575:
572:
571:
564:Low-importance
560:
554:
553:
551:
539:Women in Music
534:the discussion
530:Women in music
520:
508:
507:
505:Low‑importance
502:Women in Music
499:
487:
486:
483:
482:
480:
463:the discussion
449:
437:
436:
431:
419:
418:
415:
414:
401:
391:
390:
379:
373:
372:
370:
353:the discussion
340:
339:
323:
311:
310:
296:
284:
283:
280:
279:
270:
260:
259:
256:Mid-importance
246:
236:
235:
233:
199:
198:
182:
170:
169:
154:
142:
141:
135:
113:
99:
98:
94:this help page
78:poorly sourced
64:
57:
56:
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3028:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2873:
2871:
2864:
2863:
2859:
2855:
2846:
2840:
2836:
2832:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2825:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2803:
2799:
2794:
2786:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2765:
2764:
2759:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2736:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2715:
2706:
2683:
2679:
2675:
2671:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2657:
2653:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2642:
2633:
2629:
2626:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2602:
2598:
2594:
2590:
2589:
2588:
2583:
2574:
2570:
2566:
2562:
2561:
2560:
2556:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2533:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2515:
2514:
2510:
2506:
2502:
2500:
2496:
2492:
2488:
2487:
2486:
2482:
2472:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2450:
2446:
2440:
2434:
2430:
2424:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2378:
2377:
2372:
2363:
2359:
2358:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2342:
2341:
2340:
2335:
2326:
2325:the admission
2322:
2321:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2291:I’m glad per
2290:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2261:
2252:
2248:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2223:
2214:
2210:
2207:
2204:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2156:
2147:
2141:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2077:
2068:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2039:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1989:
1980:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1946:
1945:
1944:
1939:
1928:
1922:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1895:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1874:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1829:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1786:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1733:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1710:
1708:
1703:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1689:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1677:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1620:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1593:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1582:
1578:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1547:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1524:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1384:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1354:
1348:
1345:
1342:
1339:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1311:
1307:
1299:
1292:
1286:
1280:
1274:
1269:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1219:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1193:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1181:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1159:
1157:
1156:
1151:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1132:
1131:
1129:
1128:
1123:
1117:
1115:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1103:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1072:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1003:
997:
995:
994:
989:
984:
983:
972:
968:
965:
961:
960:
959:
952:
946:
942:
938:
934:
928:
923:
918:
914:
910:
908:
904:
900:
898:
894:
890:
888:
884:
880:
878:
874:
870:
868:
864:
860:
858:
854:
850:
848:
844:
840:
838:
832:
826:
824:
820:
816:
814:
810:
806:
804:
798:
792:
790:
786:
782:
781:
780:
778:
774:
770:
765:
759:
747:
743:
739:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
719:
713:
711:
703:
690:
685:
679:
677:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
660:
654:
652:
645:
641:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
607:
601:
599:
592:
584:
569:
565:
559:
556:
555:
552:
535:
531:
527:
526:
521:
518:
514:
513:
509:
503:
500:
497:
493:
481:
464:
460:
456:
455:
450:
447:
443:
442:
438:
435:
432:
429:
425:
412:
409:(assessed as
408:
407:
397:
393:
392:
388:
384:
378:
375:
374:
371:
354:
350:
346:
345:
337:
326:
324:
321:
317:
316:
312:
305:
304:Entertainment
300:
297:
294:
290:
277:
276:
266:
262:
261:
257:
254:(assessed as
253:
252:
242:
238:
237:
234:
217:
216:documentation
213:
209:
205:
204:
196:
185:
183:
180:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
158:
155:
152:
148:
143:
139:
133:
125:
124:
114:
110:
105:
104:
96:
95:
90:
86:
82:
79:
75:
71:
70:
65:
63:
62:
54:
50:
46:
45:
40:
36:
35:
34:
28:
25:
18:
17:
2850:
2792:
2790:
2729:
2725:
2702:
2625:Global Times
2624:
2568:
2565:Global Times
2564:
2543:Global Times
2522:
2418:
2129:
2119:
2024:
2020:
2002:
1998:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1884:
1875:reprimands (
1870:
1818:
1814:
1771:
1767:
1759:
1713:
1706:
1701:
1666:
1662:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1595:
1573:
1519:
1355:
1352:
1346:
1340:
1334:
1328:
1322:
1316:
1303:
1239:Fan Bingbing
1207:
1197:
1196:
1183:
1172:Instructions
1099:
1096:
1071:source check
1050:
1044:
1041:
1007:Fan Bingbing
1004:
1001:
979:
976:
951:source check
930:
924:
921:
769:Fan Bingbing
766:
763:
709:
701:
699:
675:
650:
644:Stephen Chow
639:
636:non sequitur
635:
631:
597:
588:
563:
523:
452:
404:
382:
342:
336:China portal
273:
249:
201:
138:WikiProjects
121:
92:
80:
73:
67:
42:
31:
30:
27:Fan Bingbing
26:
2813:Emmentalist
2798:Emmentalist
2439:Carabinieri
2435:, and also
1600:(including
1556:Carabinieri
1546:Heliosxeros
1529:Carabinieri
1523:Heliosxeros
1481:Carabinieri
1460:Carabinieri
1431:Carabinieri
1398:Carabinieri
1358:renominated
1347:6. Images?:
1341:5. Stable?:
1186:transcluded
638:. How many
53:renominated
2870:Categories
2253:nonsense.
1979:WP:CRYSTAL
1965:(actually
1883:) of both
1709:-published
1606:Sina Weibo
1362:reassessed
1349:Used well.
1251:contact me
1139:Authorship
1125:GA toolbox
1108:Report bug
988:Report bug
717:contact me
683:contact me
658:contact me
605:contact me
2753:Caradhras
2709:Caradhras
2636:Caradhras
2607:WP:BURDEN
2577:Caradhras
2547:WP:BURDEN
2527:Caradhras
2366:Caradhras
2329:Caradhras
2255:Caradhras
2217:Caradhras
2150:Caradhras
2087:WP:VERIFY
2071:Caradhras
2033:Caradhras
1983:Caradhras
1971:Sina News
1933:Caradhras
1889:Caradhras
1885:Sina News
1823:Caradhras
1815:inference
1780:Caradhras
1768:Sina News
1727:Caradhras
1702:Sina News
1671:Caradhras
1667:Sina News
1630:MSN China
1614:Caradhras
1610:Sina Blog
1597:Sina News
1444:judgment.
1220:GA Notice
1198:Reviewer:
1162:Templates
1153:Reviewing
1118:GA Review
1091:this tool
1084:this tool
971:this tool
964:this tool
831:dead link
797:dead link
738:Timmyshin
221:Biography
166:Musicians
157:Biography
126:is rated
85:libellous
49:please do
2854:NoCringe
2793:incident
2573:WP:POINT
2249:"-level
1570:Sina.com
1392:and the
1247:criteria
1211:contribs
1167:Criteria
1097:Cheers.—
977:Cheers.—
640:Wansuiye
632:Wansuiye
2755:Aiguo (
2711:Aiguo (
2638:Aiguo (
2579:Aiguo (
2529:Aiguo (
2523:without
2423:Zubin12
2368:Aiguo (
2344:MarkH21
2331:Aiguo (
2257:Aiguo (
2219:Aiguo (
2152:Aiguo (
2073:Aiguo (
2035:Aiguo (
1985:Aiguo (
1975:Reuters
1935:Aiguo (
1891:Aiguo (
1825:Aiguo (
1782:Aiguo (
1772:QQ News
1729:Aiguo (
1719:Uppsala
1673:Aiguo (
1616:Aiguo (
1495:Zubin12
1475:Zubin12
1446:Zubin12
1413:Zubin12
1383:Zubin12
1366:Zubin12
1257:Zubin12
1201:Zubin12
1011:my edit
835:tag to
801:tag to
773:my edit
618:Please
566:on the
385:on the
128:B-class
2652:WP:BLP
2650:Its a
2386:WP:BLP
2167:WP:RSN
2130:Xinhua
2126:WP:GAN
1877:Nasdaq
1552:WP:GAN
1231:Notice
827:Added
793:Added
134:scale.
2656:WP:RS
2476:MarkH
2382:WP:RS
2323:Note
2271:WP:PA
2201:Your
2049:WP:PA
1760:Wiley
1707:Wiley
1655:9,800
1634:MSNBC
1594:, so
1188:from
468:Women
459:women
434:Women
358:China
349:China
299:China
115:This
2858:talk
2835:talk
2817:talk
2802:talk
2773:talk
2743:talk
2678:talk
2664:talk
2615:talk
2597:talk
2555:talk
2509:talk
2495:talk
2461:talk
2427:who
2394:talk
2362:this
2352:talk
2315:talk
2301:talk
2283:talk
2273:per
2237:talk
2193:talk
2179:talk
2095:talk
2057:talk
2011:talk
1954:talk
1911:talk
1844:talk
1801:talk
1750:talk
1692:talk
1663:Sina
1645:talk
1608:and
1581:talk
1560:talk
1533:talk
1499:talk
1485:talk
1464:talk
1450:talk
1435:talk
1417:talk
1402:talk
1370:talk
1261:talk
1205:talk
742:talk
702:very
624:here
377:High
210:and
2140:AGK
2025:AFP
1967:AFP
1873:CAC
1770:or
1661:on
1065:RfC
1035:to
1025:to
945:RfC
915:to
905:to
895:to
885:to
875:to
865:to
855:to
845:to
821:to
811:to
787:to
710:LDS
676:LDS
651:LDS
634:is
598:LDS
558:Low
74:BLP
2872::
2860:)
2837:)
2819:)
2804:)
2775:)
2761:)
2745:)
2717:)
2680:)
2666:)
2644:)
2617:)
2599:)
2585:)
2557:)
2535:)
2511:)
2497:)
2479:21
2463:)
2451:?
2396:)
2374:)
2354:)
2337:)
2317:)
2303:)
2285:)
2263:)
2239:)
2225:)
2195:)
2181:)
2158:)
2148:.
2144:,
2097:)
2079:)
2069:.
2059:)
2041:)
2023:/
2013:)
1991:)
1956:)
1941:)
1931:.
1913:)
1897:)
1879:,
1846:)
1831:)
1803:)
1788:)
1752:)
1735:)
1725:.
1721:,
1694:)
1679:)
1647:)
1639:.
1622:)
1583:)
1562:)
1535:)
1501:)
1487:)
1466:)
1452:)
1437:)
1419:)
1404:)
1372:)
1312::
1288:·
1282:·
1276:·
1263:)
1243:GA
1229:GA
1213:)
1078:.
1073:}}
1069:{{
958:.
953:}}
949:{{
833:}}
829:{{
799:}}
795:{{
744:)
413:).
302::
258:).
164:/
160::
2856:(
2833:(
2815:(
2800:(
2771:(
2741:(
2676:(
2662:(
2613:(
2595:(
2553:(
2507:(
2493:(
2459:(
2441::
2437:@
2425::
2421:@
2392:(
2350:(
2313:(
2299:(
2281:(
2235:(
2191:(
2177:(
2142::
2138:@
2093:(
2055:(
2009:(
1952:(
1909:(
1842:(
1799:(
1748:(
1690:(
1643:(
1579:(
1558:(
1548::
1544:@
1531:(
1525::
1521:@
1497:(
1483:(
1477::
1473:@
1462:(
1448:(
1433:(
1415:(
1400:(
1385::
1381:@
1368:(
1259:(
1208:·
1203:(
1110:)
1106:(
1093:.
1086:.
990:)
986:(
973:.
966:.
740:(
570:.
389:.
278:.
218:.
140::
97:.
72:(
55:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
